F110 - Posting orders: 8 generated, 7 completed

Hi,
One of our payment in a payment run was not completed.
In payment log, payment document was generated and there were no errors. But in FB03 or table BKPF, there is no such document number. In other words, a document number was skipped.
I checked SM13 and there is an error for module name REGUS_DELETE.
Function Module: REGUS_DELETE
Status: Update was terminated
Report: LF005U10
Row: 16
Error details: 00 671: ABAP/4 processor: DBIF_RSQL_SQL_ERROR.
I cannot see anything wrong with that particular payment.
Anybody has any tips? Is there a need to repeat update?
Thanks.

Hi,
This error is relaated to abbap.There is some error occur due to SQL:- DBIF_RSQL_SQL_ERROR. Kindly contatct to your ABAP consultant.
Nikhil

Similar Messages

F110 - Posting orders: 2 generated, 0 completed???

Hello,
Carried out Automatic Payment Run through F110
Posting orders: 2 generated, 0 completed
In Payment Run Log, Accounting Docs. are shown however, infact Accounting Docs. are not generated by clearing open items within vendor account. Open Items within vendor account are Overdue Down Payment Requests
What could be the reason for such behaviour?
Will really appreciate your inputs on this
Thanks & Regards,
Ameya...

Hi
After you get the mesage
Carried out Automatic Payment Run through F110
Posting orders: 2 generated, 0 completed
You need to refersh data by pressing Status or Pressing Enter.
Regards
Venkat

F110 Posting Order Not Generated

Hi
I am using F110 - Automatic Payment Program. Payment run has been carried out but not able to generate posting orders.
Kindly help in resolving the issue.
Regards
Sonica

Hi,
I am not able to edit the payment proposal & below is the error message that pops up :
Company codes 1001/1001 do not appear in proposal 05.03.2008 ABCDE; correct
    Message no. FZ003
Diagnosis
    No data exists for the specified paying company code 1001 and the
    specified sending company code 1001 in payment proposal 05.03.2008
    ABCDE.
System Response
    The payment proposal cannot be edited.
Procedure
    Check the flow trace and payment proposal list in order to determine why
    the specified company codes are not contained in the proposal.
kindly assist.
Regards
Sonica

F110 Issue: Posting orders: 8 generated, 7 completed

Hi,
I am facing issue with F110,
Posting orders: 8 generated, 7 completed.
The Payment Run Log shows a problem with the Form Type.
I have checked SM13 as well and the log shows:
Function Module        POST_DOCUMENT
Status                 Update was terminated
Report                 LF005F01
Row                    1.990
Error details   Class:     F1         Number:    805
Clearing: Line item 005 in document 6650 1600001334 2012 already cleared.
Finally, can any one help me out that Is there a problem with the Form as per the Payment Run Log or is it because of SM13 log showing Line item cleared???
Please assist.... Any input will be really appreciated.

Hi Team,
I am getting the following Error:
In form ZF_110_HOME_TRF9 / window MAIN, the element 510-C (Text-C) is missing
In form ZF_110_HOME_TRF9 / window MAIN, the element 515 (Heading) is missing
In form ZF_110_HOME_TRF9 / window MAIN, the element 520 (Carry forward above) is missing
In form ZF_110_HOME_TRF9 / window MAIN, the element 526 (Py.adv.note) is missing
In form ZF_110_HOME_TRF9 / window MAIN, the element 530 (Total) is missing
In form ZF_110_HOME_TRF9 / window MAIN, the element 615 (Heading) is missing
In form ZF_110_HOME_TRF9 / window MAIN, the element 620 (Carry forward above) is missing
In form ZF_110_HOME_TRF9 / window MAIN, the element 625 (Line items) is missing
In form ZF_110_HOME_TRF9 / window MAIN, the element 630 (Total) is missing
Output of the relevant forms is defective
Is there any SAP Note for this????
Please Assist....

Post order processing for sales document is not yet complete

hi,
sap gurus,
i am facing the error while saving the sales order and this ticket is unique and it is saying that
"post order processing for sales document is not yet complete".
please help me in this regard.
and it is blocking the order for further processing.
regards,
balajit

I dont think this is a standard error message. Some exit is applied for sale order to meet some requirements. You need to check with your ABAPer.
In fact, you can conclude yourself based on the error message number. If it starts with Z, then the above holds good.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Can not see the ICON of Complete Order (Business Completion) in the IW32.

Hi All,
          I want to Complete the Maintenance Order (Business Completion) but I can not see Icon - Complete Order. to complete the Maintenance Order. I understand Order --- Function -
Completion path can be used for competeion but it is disabled.
          For Superuser's LOGIN they have the ICON for complete Orders and they can see any error message for completiing Orders. Since I cant perform complete Order I can not see any error message.
         Is there any user settings for ICON's display.
Regards,
Narendra

It is assigned in role
To display - run PFCG and select the role click display and select authorisation tab click details icon and click organisation level to view the Buisness transaction
To maintain - Run PFCG and select role : SAP_Workorder_Closer ,Click the pencil and click on the authorisation tab and change authorisation value and eithier you can manually maintain I_BETRVORG with BABS value. or Choose Plant maintenance business transaction from the structure and add BABS and generate the profile. then execute the transaction.
Co-ordinate with Basis or Security team
Thanks
S.N

Work order less completion

Hi ,
By mistake we have performed WIP Assembly Return through Work order less completion, due to this On hand got reduced.
Could you please advice how to reverse this transaction.
Regards
Ravi

Hi Ravi,
Yes, system will not allow to transact the same schedule number again. New schedule number will be generated automatically when you perform the WIP Assy Completion transaction using Work Order-Less Completions window and all the accounting entries will be balanced in the system.
Regards
Shabbir

Adjust posting order of new/modified entities in ADF BC

Hi,
I have any ADF application which has two tables:
BUDGET
BUDGET_ID: NUMBER(12) -- Which is a sequence from DB sequence BUDGET_SEQ
BUDGET_DETAIL
BUDGET_ID: NUMBER(12) -- Foreign key to BUDGET(BUDGET_ID)
LINE: NUMBER(7) -- A sequential number based on the master with one based, for ex: BUDGET_ID/LINE may be 1234/1, 1234/2, 1234/3 ..., and 1235/1, 1235/2, 1235/3...
CONSTRAINT BUDGET_DETAIL_UK UNIQUE (BUDGET_ID, LINE)
In JDev 11.1.1.2.0, the Model project has 2 entity objects, 2 view objects, 1 association and 1 viewlink, they are BudgetEO, BudgetVO, BudgetDetailEO, BudgetVO, Budget_BudgetDetail_Assoc and Budget_BudgetDetail_ViewLink (based on the association) to access the BUDGET and BUDGET_DETAIL table.
When we mark budget, we will create a row in BudgetVO and then create some rows in BudgetDetailVO. In the BudgetDetailVO, we always reorganize the "Line" attribute to be sequential after create new row and delete row. The code like the following:
private void reorganizeLineNo() {
RowSetIterator iter = this.createRowSetIterator(null);
try {
int idx = 1;
while (iter.hasNext()) {
Row row = iter.next();
row.setAttribute("Line", new Number(idx++));
} finally {
iter.closeRowSetIterator();
My problem is if we add/remove BudgetDetail(s) in the following sequence, it will violate DB constraint BUDGET_DETAIL_UK:
1. Create bRow1 in BudgetVO
2. Create bdRow1 in BudgetDetailVO under bRow1, here bdRow1.Line=1
3. Commit. Everything works fine
4. Set bRow1 as current row
5. Add a new bdRow2 in BudgetDetailVO under bRow1, here bdRow2.Line=2
6. Remove bdRow1, here will call reorganizeLineNo(), so bdRow2.Line=1 now.
7. Commit, exception occurs for violating DB constraint BUDGET_DETAIL_UK.
The SQL running in DB is in order of (presodo):
1. INSERT INTO BUDGET (BUDGET_ID) VALUES (BUDGET_SEQ.nextval);
2. INSERT INTO BUDGET_DETAIL (BUDGET_ID, LINE) VALUES (:TheBudgetId, 1);
3. Commit
4. INSERT INTO BUDGET_DETAIL(BUDGET_ID,LINE) VALUES (:TheBudgetId, 1); -- Violate BUDGET_DETAIL_UK
5. DELETE FROM BUDGET_DETAIL WHERE BUDGET_ID=:TheBudgetId AND LINE=1
6. Commit.
How to adjust to posting order in ADF BC to post the DELETE in step 5 before the INSERT step 4?
Many thanks!
Regards,
Thomas.

This work flows screens for this kind of constrain violation. On solution would be to commit the operation after inserting line 2, and then deleting line 1.
I think this is a poor design, because you will run in trouble if more the one user is working in your system.You have to edit a bunch of rows only you deleted one. It's never a good idea to have an editable pk or even a part of it.
I would try to decouple the line number from the primary key all together. You could easily generate the line number when you show the lines (i.e. using an index of the iterator). This way you can use a sequence number as pk for the line item. The order of the line items is simply the order of the sequence numbers (which will never displayed to the user).
Timo

Work Order Less Completion Form-Help

Hello Guys i have a question on WIP- Work Order Less Completion Form.
In the form when we enter the assemebly item and go to Components-->Lot/Serial, In Lot entry form there is a field called Lot number which has LOV and also allows user to enter his own Value what he needs.
My question is is there any controls in Oracle where we can prevent user from entering his value in the LOt number field,instead he has to select it from LOV only.
Please help me on this.
Thanks

Hi,
Please see if these documents help.
Note: 112055.1 - Lot/Serial Control Setups
Note: 338189.1 - When Receiving an RMA, Lot Number LOV Shows All Lots
Regards,
Hussein

How to count number of sales orders generated in a month in SAP SD

Hi SD Gurus,
I have a very strange query from client. I have to count the number of sales order created in a month for a z report. For example 30 in Jan, 25 in Feb etc. Could anyone suggest me How to count number of sales orders generated in a month in SAP SD.
Regards
Vinod Kumar

Hi,
Goto the T.Code "SE16" or "SE16n" or "SE11".
Enter the table name as VBAK
Enter the created on date as the starting date of the period and to date as the end date.
Enter.
Click on "Number of Entries".It will tell you the number of entries created in a particular period.
If you want a report,goto the T.Code "VA05n".
Regards,
Krishna.

VL10E report should show only sales order with complete stock

Hello Friends,
I have to make-to-order scenario. While creating a sales order the system proposes a delivery date based on the inhouse production day maintained in the material master.
In VL10E the system gives list of Sales Order for which delivery is due on that particular date. It does not check whether actually the material is really available on that date for the concerned sales order.
Is there any scope ( any config change or user_exit) which will show only the sales order with complete stock confirmed through production order in the VL10E report.
Regards
Debesh

Hi,
Check userexit LV50R_VIEWG02. If CF_SUBRC = 1 you will not see it in the list. For this purpose in the interfase you have the information in IS_VBEP. Set a break-point and check the conditions.
For more info check the Note 198137 - VL10: Customer-specific enhancements / user exits
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo

I downloaded Firefox 4 Beta and everytime I tried to open up the browser, I get a message stating I need to reboot the computer in order to complete the upgrade; I've rebooted the computer at least 4 times.

I downloaded Firefox 4 Beta and everytime I tried to open up the browser, I get a message stating I need to reboot the computer in order to complete the upgrade; I've rebooted the computer at least 4 times. I even tried to download a previous version of Firefox and I am still getting the same message that I need to reboot the computer in order to complete the previous upgrade.

I have a very similar problem myself. Error 42408. And my phone isnt being recognized. I have restored my phone with no luck. I completely uninstalled itunes and reinstalled and it worked then when I ejected unplugged and plugged it back in it had the same problem over again.. I have no idea what to do?

What is the logic for 2LIS_17_I3HDR to pick a order as completed on time?

Hi, Experts:
I am working on PM using 2LIS_17_I3HDR to load data. In 2LIS_17_I3HDR, there is a field called "orders completed on-time". I am wondering what is the logic for 2LIS_17_I3HDR to identify if an order was completed on time. I would assume it compares some kind of completion/finish date with a planed/schduled comletion/finish date. Would someone please tell me what fields in what table or in transaction IW39 DOES does 2LIS_17_I3HDR use for this?
Many thanks!
Jenny

Hi, Ram:
Thank you for the reply!
The key figure is ZHLAFIH_TGERL (Number of On-time Closed Orders). I saw some SAP programs refering to its component type "DZHLAFIH_TE" too.
Thanks,
Jenny
Edited by: Jenny Chen on Dec 2, 2009 7:53 PM
Edited by: Jenny Chen on Dec 2, 2009 7:55 PM

Controlling Post Order of Multiple View Objects

Hi ,
Here is the scenario:
I have a use case of "Creating an Abstract"
Steps:
step1 ) (Page 1) Author presents the details of the abstract (Details goes to 2 tables ABSTRACT & ABSTRACT_CONTENT tables). For the 2 tables i have 2 entities. I use a view here called CreateAbstractView from both the tables( here i control the post order of the entities ....code from jdeveloper 11g guide)
Step 2)(Page 2) Author presents details of Additional Authors. I use the view (*AdditionalAuthorDetailsView*) (Details goes to 2 tables AUTHOR & ABSTRACT). Here in the abstract table i have a parent key(parent abstract id) So all the additional authors has a record in Abstract table with parent_abstract_id from step1. ABSTRACT table also has a foreign key (author_id) .Here also i control the post order of the 2 entity object using the code from jdeveloper 11g guide.
I also have a link from CreateAbstractView to AdditionalAuthorDetailsView (abstract_id in Abstract table from CreateAbstractView to parent_abstract_id in Abstract table from AdditionalAuthorDetailsView )
If i have a commit on both the pages , i don't see a problem.
But i want to have a commit process at the end so that the user can review the information. So when i try to add a commit process at the end , i get a exception (Parent Key not found exception) which i came to understand that commit from AdditionalAuthorDetailsView is happening first which is trying to insert a record into ABSTRACT table and cannot find the parent_abstract_id.
How do i control the post order for multiple view objects in such scenarios?

Hi!
Please take a look at the dev guide. It comes down to controlling the posting order on entity level.
http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/html/B25947_01/bcadveo007.htm#CEGJAFCF
Sascha

ADF BC - unable to control posting order

Hello,
we have big troubles with controlling entity posting order when deleting entities.
For simplicity consider this example:
- you have Dept (master) and Emp (detail) entities
- then:
a) change some attribute in current Dept row
b) remove all Emps in current Dept
c) remove current Dept
- then postChanges
You will get JBO-26048 (oracle.jbo.DMLConstraintException - ORA-02292: integrity constraint violated - child record found)
I would expect (as my operations are in correct order) that it will be posted to database without problem. It isn't.
Explanation:
First change of Dept entity (point a) will put this entity to the first place in transaction list of object waiting to be posted to database. It is ready for update now. Point b) will put all removed Emp entities in posting list from 2nd ... N-th position.
Then point c) - Dept remove - instead of putting the Dept to (N+1)th posting place will change Dept state from modified to deleted because it is already in the list on the first place. Now Dept is 1st and in deleted state.
It means first post operation will be Dept (master) deletion => constraint violation.
Our real situation is much more complicated. We cannot just omit Dept update.
We tried to post the Dept update first and then post removings afterwards but posting order is not cleared after postChanges. The only solution we found (very bad solution) is to clearEntityCache between postings - this also clears transaction posting list (it means: update Dept, postChanges, clearEntityCache, remove Emps, remove Dept, postChanges)
Is there another solution how to solve this problem.
Is it possible to postChanges after Dept update and to have transaction posting list empty and ready for another independent operations.
Thank you.
Rado

Hi Sascha,
yes I have.
The problem is that entity accessors wil not return data when entity is in deleted state.
In my example dept.getEmps() returns RowIterator with row count = 0 when it is used in postChanges method.
I tried to workaround this with own ArrayList in master collecting deleted details. As a master (Dept) mustn't know its detail is going to be deleted, it is job for Emp to aks its master to store it into its temporary array of deleted Emps. Then in Dept postChanges I can iterate through the array not through accessor row iterator.
The weakness of this solution is that remove operations and post operation mustn't be in one request. So it is not guaranteed the temporary array will survive. Therefore it must support passivating and activating. And I think it is very complicated for so "simple" problem.
For now steps:
1. update dept
2. postchanges
3. clearentitycache
4. delete emps
5. delete dept
6 postchanges
work for me.
Rado

F110 - Posting orders: 8 generated, 7 completed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for