F110S (payment run + DME creation) running for infinite time

Hi ABAP gurus,
I originally posted this question in ERP finicials but didn't get any response. If somebody has faced any similar issue please share the solution
A batch job schduled for "daily payment run + creation of DME files" using F110S (SAP ECC 6.0) . The batch is running in production for more infinite time.
The job runs in following 2 steps
1. SAPF110S which processes the payment clears FBL5N.
2. SAPFPAYM_SCHEDULE.
The second step seems a non-ending process.
The job variant has only 15 customers, only one invoice is to be processed against one account.
However in quality system the same job with more than 10,000 customer account range with more than 10 invoices runs just in few minutes.
Any idea or suggestion why it's taking so long in production? Any missing configuration in production server?
==================
It's not performance issue. When we run F110S or F110 in production with individual login id, program runs the way it should and finishes in reasonable time (for example the scenario I described in question finsihes in few seconds).
The problem occurs only when production batch job runs with job scheduler; program seems looping somewhere for infinite time - to be particular it keeps reading the table TPRI_DEF which has just few records (must be reading this table inside a loop).
Thanks,
Satyaki.

Hello,
Since the issue seems still open, (status Not Answered), and since I encountered the same problem, here is the solution. Apparently, a printer must be defined either in OBPM4 (payment variant) or in user personal data (Menu System / User profil / Own data)
In Box 'Spool Control' / Filed 'OutputDevice', enter your default printer.
Once SAP report can determine Printer, program will stop to run endless.
Best regards
LB

Similar Messages

For the maintaining session for infinite time

hi
i want to know that how can we make a session valid for infinite time.i mean to say if we have to make session invalid explicitly otherwise it would be alive for infinite time
thanks

unless you're using static IP's, then your lease is going to expire at some point in time and you'll eventually loose the connection.
You can store "session" information and reinitialize and connect to a damon that is running on a server.

F110 Issue:there is diff between of 1000usd in F110 payment list & dme file

H i experts
F110 Issue: there is difference between of 1000 usd in F110 payment list and Dme file.
please let me know reason
regards
sachin

Check the amount field in the DME as to which value it is picking. I think it is mapped incorrectly.
Ravi.

Adadmin Compile APPS schema never complete & it running for infinite time

Hi,
When I am trying to compile apps schema from adadmin --> compile apps schema, It never complete & it is not compiling invalid objects, I tried to manually run the adutlrcmp.sql through SQL, also the same problem the scripts is stuck (hang) in the UTL_RECOMP.RECOMP_PARALLEL proceure.
Please note the following:
1- That I am able to compile invalid objects manually through Toad Or through alter package.
2- The compile apps schema was running successfully & very fast in the past.
What should I do? how can I resolve this issue ?
Your quick feed back is very much appreciated.
Marwan

Hi Hussein,
The following is the adadmin log for the compile apps schema:
AD code level : [B.1]
Connecting to SYSTEM......Connected successfully.
Connecting to APPS......Connected successfully.
sqlplus -s APPS/***** @/u03/applprod/prod/apps/apps_st/appl/ad/12.0.0/sql/adutlrcmp.sql APPLSYS ***** APPS ***
** ***** 0 0 NONE FALSE
Arguments are:
AOL_schema = APPLSYS, AOL_password = *****,
Schema_to_compile = APPS, Schema_to_compile_pw = *****,
SYSTEM_password = *****, Total_workers = 0, Logical_worker_num = 0
Object_type_to_not_compile = NONE
Use_stored_dependencies = FALSE
Connected.
Running utl_recomp.recomp_parallel(0), if it exists
no rows selected
Elapsed: 00:00:00.17
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.00
STATUS_MESSAGE
Running UTL_RECOMP.RECOMP_PARALLEL...
declare
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01013: user requested cancel of current operation
An error occurred while running a SQL*Plus script.
As you can see the :
STATUS_MESSAGE
Running UTL_RECOMP.RECOMP_PARALLEL...
Is stucking & you wait for a long long time & it never ends So I canceled it manually.
And when checking the database locks the following appears:
OWNER OBJECT_NAME
APPLSYS FND_CONCURRENT_QUEUES
APPLSYS FND_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS
Regards,
Marwan

MacBook Pro duty cycle - can it be run at full CPU for extended time?

Hello,
I'm wondering if anyone knows Apple's stance on the duty-cycle of the MacBook Pro models. I'm should be receiving a MBP Core2Duo 2.16 GHz in a couple days.
The reason I ask is that I currently have a PowerBook 1.33 GHz, and do a good deal of rendering of 3D computer graphics. On my PowerBook, when it is running under full load, the fan will come on for a while.. then turn off... then on for a while etc. It doesn't seem to have problems keeping the temp down unless the ambient temp of the room is high (say, above 80 F, 26C, which then is my fault and I need AC... lol, not computer design).
I have had a few MacBook Pro units from work, and they work quite differently. The fan always runs... usually around 1k RPM, and then spools up to compensate for load. I have had two left fans go bad in 1.83 GHz Duo Core units (fairly early in production), and recently got a 2.33 GHz at work. I put it under full load tonight for a while, and the fans spun up to about 4k RPM (they seem to idle at 2k RPM). This kept the temp of the CPU to around 79 C... which is a bit higher than I like... but probably safe (and our room temp is fairly cool this time of year... about 70 F, 21 C).
I'm wondering if it is safe to run a MBP like this for extended periods of time. I'm talking days here, 24x7... not just an hour or two. I have done this MANY times on my PowerBook G4 1.33... and it is probably like 3 years old or so now. Having those fans go out has just made me a bit gun shy I guess. Should I expect to be able to do this kind of thing with a 'Pro' laptop... or am I just running them too hard? Or, were there just a bad run of fans in the earlier MBPs?... it was always the left fan.
-Steve

Actually, I don't think 4,000 RPM is all that great,
and the fans shouldn't have any trouble maintaining
this speed indefinitely. 10k or more would be a
different story.
Of course, this is true only if the fans are designed
(and built) properly. I can't speak to that.
Yea, that's what I'm afraid of (fans not designed for that). It might be because I've actually witnessed a couple go bad... but I just don't think most of these tiny PC type fans can take it. Graphic card fans are notorious for going bad too. I'm less concerned with keeping the CPU temp down than I am with the high RPM on the fans actually.
Regardless, you should be able to run your MBP "full
bore" for as long as you like, and you needn't worry
about it failing.
I think you're correct... other than the fans. I'm guessing they will fail. If they did, the computer would probably just shut down. It probably wouldn't hurt anything, just need the fan replaced. But, I'd rather avoid that if I can. I suppose I could replace it myself to keep from having to send it away for a week or two.
There is one thing, however, that
most people do not consider, and which will help more
than anything else (maybe even room temp): Keep the
air around your MBP moving!
Bingo! Great lead. I guess I knew this but didn't think of how big of difference it really would make. So, I did some experimenting.
I brought up my trusty iStat Nano Dashboard widget so I could see the fan speed. Then I took a folder and fanned the computer for a couple minutes. Just this amount of air movement dropped the RPM from around 4600 (for some odd reason, my 2.16 runs at higher RPM than my 2.33, and keeps the CPU a couple degrees cooler) down to 2800. WOW!
Then my arm got tired, and I went to get a rather powerful fan I could fit on my desk (one of Honeywell vortex type fans), and then it dropped to 2200 RPM. This fan is WAY to noisy, but my folder experiment demonstrated I don't need all that much air movement... just like you said.
I think I'm going to go tomorrow and get either a couple of small fans, or maybe even some low noise computer fans and experiment with some ways of mounting them. I should be able to keep it down in the mid-2500 RPM range and still be quiet if I get the right setup.
Also, I think you can safely disregard what your
"overclocking" friends have to say. True, 100 C is
quite hot, and would certainly be too hot for earlier
processors. The Core Duo, however, is an entirely
different beast, and Intel has designed it to run
that hot. I think your friends are probably
(inappropriately) applying specs for earlier
processors to the Core Duo.
I checked the Intel specs on the Core2Duo, and it has an operating max of 100 C. It some kind of actual hardware failure type shutdown at 120 C. So, I guess 80 C is hot, but 20 C under the max operating temp. I'm sure Apple designed it to keep that temp safe, so I guess they just vary the fans to keep it under 80 C the way it looks.
Thanks much... that tip will solve my issue!
-Steve

Address field configuration for one-time customer FB70

Hi,
I understand there is more address field entered (street2, street3, street4) during the sales order creation VA01 for one-time customer. However, i hardly find the configuration to open more address field for one-time customer if user raise FI-invoice via FB70. Do you have any idea?
Thanks.

Thanks Mauri.
I understand that address field of FB70 are linked to BSEC table whereas address field of sales order creation (va01) for one-time customer, the latter linked to ADDR1_data and having the Street2, 3, 4 provided in the pop-up screen.
I am wondering is there anyway to have more address field for the FB70 since my client will have longer 'street' name so that the dunning will take place properly for one-time customer.
Thank you so much

Vendor's same open item selected for payment twice through APP run F110

Hi,
In F110 run, specified vendor number and payment method(Bank Transfer), executed payment run.
After, say 5 minutes interval again executed F110 for all vendors and except for the above mentioned payment method.
In the first case, payment document generated, posted and cleared the Vendor open items. Here, the Payment method is B.
In the second time also, the same open items are selected in the payment run and the payment method D(Cheque payment).
Payment document generated and is not posted but cheque is generated for the same amount.
How could it happened?

Hi,
In F110 run, specified vendor number and payment method(Bank Transfer), executed payment run.
After, say 5 minutes interval again executed F110 for all vendors and except for the above mentioned payment method.
In the first case, payment document generated, posted and cleared the Vendor open items. Here, the Payment method is B.
In the second time also, the same open items are selected in the payment run and the payment method D(Cheque payment).
Payment document generated and is not posted but cheque is generated for the same amount.
How could it happened?

F110 payment run completed but not generated all check for the payments

Do any one have an idea or the potential answer on my query
I've run F110 and generated one Payment all 45 open items for one vendor
Now after the print done only the first 20 items got into the check register, and left over the remaining 25 items
So my question is why system not generated the check for the remaining 25 items and what is the remedy

No all settings are available, but still the same situation the all checks are not generated for all items of the vendor open items clearing in the one payment documents
single vendor
single payment for all 25 open items
After print activity compelted
checks created for items 5
leftover items 20 not created check
can anyone tell why system is behaving like this

Email notification for payments made through F110 payment run

Hi Gurus,
I have configured all the settings for the email notification through F110 payment run. I got the email also by using the email field in the address tab.
My question is the same field is using the sales team to send their customer statements and invoices. So i selected the Contact person tab and maintained the email address.
But i could not send because the contact person tab is also pointing to the same field for email ( SMTP_ADDR)
Basically i want to send email for my payment run, without interuptting the email id which is maintained for customer statements.
Can you please suggest the alternative field to send email apart from address tab ( email field )
Regards
Krish

Hi Krish,
Please go through posted discussion tread for your needful:
Re: F110 - Automatic email to vendor when payment run is carried out
Regards,
Santoshy

Duplicate payments in Payment list of F110 payment run

Hello all,
We had run APP trhu F110 payment run was as expected with amount 100000 EUR but when we checked payment list (EDIT- Payment - Payment list) there are duplicate entries and total is showing as 200000 EUR.
Following are onservations
1) In SAP posting made correctly to all vendors with a total of 100000 EUR. So no double payments posted in vendor account
2) Payment list is showing amounts with a doument numbers. Duplicate payments also having document numbers but which are not exists in SAP
3) Documents posted with doc type ZP in sap is not in serial i.e 1,2,3,4 Its posted like 1,3,5,7... the document no 2,4 can be seen in the payment list
4) Also I checked log for the payment run and I found one warning message as "Check whether a duplicate payment medium has been created"
5) Also status of payment run is "Posting orders: 1,174 generated, 605 completed"
6) I also checked setting in FBZP which is also correct
We need to correct the DME file with correect postings
If anyone has faced issue then please share your inputs
Thanks & regards

Dear Rajan,
the payment document validation works as follows:
If you select this parameter, a form is only printed if the related
payment document has already been posted.
Note that it is not advisable to schedule the payment program and the
data medium programs to run at the same time, if you want the system to
be able to carry out validation of the payment documents - because the
system does not start posting the documents at the same time as the
program runs, and in order to ensure that the payment program generally
finishes its run before all the payment documents have been posted, the
payment medium program (started after the payment program) would display
in the error list any documents that have not (yet) been found.
As a result double payments are not possible as no payment media is
created if the payment document is not posted. The items are still
open and are selected in the next payment run again.
If the payment document validation is not used, the payment media is
created but the open item is not cleared as the payment document is
not posted. In this case you have to clear the open items manually
(if a repeat update is not possible) to avoid double payments.
dear Prashant,
It is normal that if the automatic payment does not pay all the items, You can find them hanging into sm13.
However, in general, when this happens you could try to use the edit >
payments > after termination > draw up again option, if it is
available. If there is an entry in SM13, as in Your case, you should process it.
But sometimes the System does not allow to do it.
Anyway the only problem I can see is the one reported by the note 545340:
When the payment program is terminated, it may be the case that not all
payment documents exist on the updated database while the entries
already exist in the tables REGUH and REGUP. However, this basic
procedure has the advantage that the payment media can already be
created for the purpose of fast forwarding to the bank when for example
the payment documents update is delayed.
For this problem please refer to the Note 545340 point [4]
that answers to it.
Furthermore please be aware that:
as I told You in the beginning, If the payment program does not pay
all the invoices contained into the payment proposal, It will depend on
the fact that during the payment proposal run time and the payment
proposal time, something changed respect one of the selected invoices.
This means that one document number was NOT posted even if It is
contained in the tables REGUH and REGUP.
Please be informed payment data tables REGU* are used by only payment
program and no need to take any corrective action and should not be a
problem with auditors.
So You can pay the invoices manually or by the next automatic payment
run without any problem.
I hope now the System behaviour is more clear.
Mauri

F110 Payment Run

I am having a problem with F110 Payment run. It's showing the error as: 'Item cannot be paid due to inconsistent withholding tax'. I have done the payment run for the same vendor, same company code and it worked well. Later, I deleted one of the WH Tax type in Vendor Master. Has anyone come across this or similar issue?. What can I do to solve this?.

hi,
I am not able to see the Deleted WH Tax info. when I run the RFWT0010. I tried to do the payment run after executing RFWT0010, but am not able to resolve the problem. I have run the S_P00_07000134(the 1099 report) a few days back(before posting the new Invoices). Do you think this has anything to do with the existing problem. And I have checked the config. again for the tax type, Tax codes and their assignments to Co.Cd. which everything seems to be correct. I tried to pay using f-53 which is showing the same error.
As Hein said i tried to look in the Invoice doc. for the WHTax info.(I have the setting to do calculate the WHTax amount @ the Payment level). So, its not possible to delete the Tax code and make the settings in VM.
As per suresh, I have checked the validity of the tax code its(1/1/2000-12/31/9999). And the tax type, tax code are assigned in the VMR.
I am not able to resolve this. Has anyone come across the same/similar issue and resolved it?.

F110 Payment run Problem

Hi All, I have few doubts in running F110 Transaction,
1) Is it Time Dependant? I mean to say I schedule Payment run today for 3 vendors and Next Payment run would be 2 days from now i.e on 01/21.
2)Can I have another Payment run for different Vedors Tomorrow 01/20 and Next Payment run date as 01/21 again? when I try to edit the Proposal it gives ccod xxxx/xxxx do not appear in Proposal xx/xx/xxxx Test-1:Correct
3) If a vendor is having 3 Line items one is Payable immediately, second is 14 day time and last one is payable in 30 days ,when I choose this Vendor in F110 today, will it take all three lne items payable?because I want to pay him all ,I tried this but system is taking only one Line item why?
Thank you ,
Paarthaa,

Hi Mike Thank you for your Time to reply,I tried to take over 40 day time period as next Payment run date for one Particular Vendor with 3 Line Items having for him, out of Three, two are already over due and one is having 30 day Grace Period ,according to you as I gave 40 day time for next Payrun the system should Pick all 3 Line Items but it is not doing, it is Picking only one Line item with Least Amount,this time I dont see the error messgage during the Edit Proposal,
"How can I decide Next Payrun date with out Showing That Error Message during Edit Proposal"? if I am choosing 100 vendors at a time for APPrgram? One thing for sure that error messgae is dependant of Next Payment Run date,
Thank you ,
Paarthaa,

F110 PAYMENT RUN NOT PICKING UP LINE ITEMS

Hi Everyone,
We use the APP functionality to pay customers credit memo. so when running F110, we indicate the credit memo document number in the further selection criteria in F110. It has always been working fine, but some customer that we have paid before, we ran F110 and it cleared some documents but did not clear the others. The line item is sitting in the customers account correctly and the payment terms is the one we have always used (2% 15 days net 30days).
What do you think i can check againg

hi Adeola,
See for running the F110 the payment must be overdue then only can able to run the APP run.
As you have mentioned in ur seetings only that the payment terms is set for 30 days.
As this payments is not yet overdue.
If you Run after 30 days then you can run the Payment run.
Please let me know, is this helpfull to u.....
Regards
Ranjit

System shut down during F110 payment run

During the F110 payment run, the PRD system shut down. There were 259 items in the proposal and according to the status 42 posting orders were generated and completed. What is the process to handle this problem? Can the payment run be re-started?
It appears that clearing documents were created for some open items before the system shut down but no checks are showing in the check register. Has this happened to anyone before and what steps should be taken to resolve this?

Is it a matter of...
1. deleting the output of the payment run,
2. deleting the proposal
3. canceling the the payment check by check using FCH8 if any occurred
4. reseting and reversing the clearing documents created using FBRA before the system shut down
5. start a new payment run

F110 Payment run terminated

Hi,
We have terminated payment run(due to closed period). No documents were cleared or posted. We want to cancel the run so that we can select the items from the vendor with different parameters(posting dates)
System currently does not allow to run the payment program again for the particular vendor as the items are locked in the terminated payment run.
How do we cancel the terminated run and re run the payment program for the vendor again with the new parameters.
Kindly advise
thank you
Umang

Go to F110 and give your payment run id and date.
Then on top select EDIT > Payments > After Termination > "Draw Up Again" or "Release for Payment"
Regards,
Gaurav

F110S (payment run + DME creation) running for infinite time

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for