Failover Cluster networking issue

Normally when configuring a SQL cluster you put the communication to the shared storage (usually a SAN) on a separate network, and so your config looks something like this (long live ms paint!):
So in this example the 192.168.100.0/28 subnet is used for cluster inter-communication (heartbeat) and for access to the shared storage. Access to the shared storage is kept completely isolated from the corporate network and everyone's happy.
On the corporate network side the cluster registers itself onto DNS on the 10.0.0.0/24 subnet and clients can resolver the cluster name and connect to it.
My configuration is slightly different though and I am having some problems with the networking side.
In my configuration my shared storage is a file server cluster with two nodes. So the "clients" of the file server cluster are the SQL servers themselves. As such, the network configuration should, as I see it, be something like this:
In this setup the SQL servers would still connect to the shared storage on a separate subnet, as per best practices, therefore keeping the cluster traffic separate from the corporate subnet.
However, for this to work the file server cluster IP address needs to be on the 192.168.100.0/28 subnet, and still be able to register on the DNS server on 10.0.0.0/24 subnet. Now this already involves setting up a lot more things than you would normally
on the cluster NICs, it is no longer just an IP address and a subnet mask, now you need a DNS server and a gateway, as well as ensuring that the DNS server is contactable from clients on the 192.168.100.0/28 subnet, meaning complete isolation is gone.
I can't find any best practices on how to get this done, and I don't think that the solution is to put this on a the cluster communication on the corporate network, nor to create a DNS server on the 192.168.100.0/28 subnet, so does someone have any ideas
how to get this done or how to improve the design of the setup?

Hi cogumel0,
In your case personal advice is you can add the additional NICs on SOFS computers and SQL cluster then make all this NIC at a same separate subnet such as 192.168.101.0/24,
disable the default settings with new added NICs: DNS register AND NetBios over TCPIP, then create a static DNS A record point to the new added NICs IP address.
Since the SQL on SMB storage only support the UNC path, we need create a another CAP On SOFS cluster (192.168.101.0/24 subnet CAP), after that we can create a static DNS A record
for this CAP and configure the SQL cluster access this CAP only.
The related information:
Install SQL Server with SMB Fileshare as a Storage Option
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh759341.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
Using Multiple Client Access Points (CAP) in a Windows Server 2008 (R2) Failover Cluster
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askcore/archive/2010/08/24/using-multiple-client-access-points-cap-in-a-windows-server-2008-r2-failover-cluster.aspx
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Similar Messages

  • Routing and Remote access can cause cluster network issues?

    After enabling routing and remote access on the servers, we found lots of cluster issues on our server like<o:p></o:p>
    Cluster Service stopped
    Communication was lost and reestablished between cluster nodes
    Unable to access witness resource
    Cluster resource failed
    can RRAS enabling causes cluster network issues?
    Rahul

    Hi TwoR,
    Please offer more information about your current cluster and RRAS configuration, such as are you installed the RRAS role on any cluster node? Are your cluster in Hyper-V environment?
    Or if you want to create the RRAS cluster you can refer the following KB:
    Deploy Remote Access in a Cluster
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj134175.aspx
    How to configure Network Load Balancing (NLB) based cluster of VPN Servers
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/rrasblog/archive/2009/07/02/configuring-network-load-balancing-nlb-cluster-of-vpn-servers.aspx
    I’m glad to be of help to you!
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Failover Cluster Network Name Failed and Can't be Repaired

    I have an issue that seem to be a different problem than any others have encountered.
    I've scoured everything I can find and nothing has fixed my problem.
    The problem starts with the common problem of the cluster network name failing on my 2 node server 2012 file server cluster.  The computer object was still in AD and appeared to be fine so it was not the common problem of the object
    getting deleted somehow.  At the time, there was no other object with that name in the recycling bin, so I don't think it was mistakenly deleted and quickly recreated to cover any tracks, so to speak.
    Following one guide, I tried to find the registry key that corresponded with the GUID of the object, but neither node in the cluster had it in its registry (which may be part of the problem).
    Since it was in the failed state, I tried to do the repair on the object to no avail.
    We run a "locked down" DC environment so all computer objects have to be pre-provisioned.  They were all pre-provisioned successfully and successfully assigned during cluster creation.  The cluster was running with no issues for a month
    or so before this problem came up.
    When I do a repair on the object while taking diagnostic logs the following 4609 error appears:
    The action 'Repair' did not complete. - System.ApplicationException: An error occurred resetting the password for 'Cluster Name'. ---> System.ComponentModel.Win32Exception: Unknown error (0x80005000)
    There appears to be a corresponding 4771 error with a failure code 0x18 that comes from the security log of the DC that states there was a Kerberos pre-authentication failure for the cluster network name object (Domain\Clustername$)
    I believe this is what is causing the repair failure.  All the information I found related to security error 4771 was either a bad credentials given for a user account or the fix was to reconnect the computer to the domain.  I can't seem to find
    a way to do this with the cluster network name.  If there's a way please let me know.
    I've tried a number of things, like resetting the object, disabling it, deleting and creating a new object with the same name, deleting that new object and recovering the original, etc...
    Can anyone shed some light on what is going on and hopefully how to fix it other than rebuilding the cluster?  I'm quite close to just tearing it down and building it back up but am hesitant because this cluster in currently in production...
    Any help would be appreciated

    Hi,
    I don’t find out the similar issue with yours, base on my experience, the 4096 error
     often caused by the CSV disk issue, and the 0x80005000 error some time caused by the repetitive computer object in OU. Please check the above related part or run the validate test then post the error information.
    Although I do have a CSV, there doesn't seem to be any problems with it and it was running just fine for a month or so before the problem started.  I double checked and there is no duplicate computer objects, maybe I don't understand what you mean by
    repetitive, could you explain further?
    The cluster validates successfully with a few warnings:
    Validating cluster resource Name: DT-FileCluster.
    This resource is marked with a state of 'Failed' instead of
    'Online'. This failed state indicates that the resource had a problem either
    coming online or had a failure while it was online. The event logs and cluster
    logs may have information that is helpful in identifying the cause of the
    failure.
    - This is because the cluster name is in the failed state
    Validating the service principal names for Name:
    DT-FileCluster.
    The network name Name: DT-FileCluster does not have a valid
    value for the read-only property 'ObjectGUID'. To validate the service principal
    name the read-only private property 'ObjectGuid' must have a valid value. To
    correct this issue make sure that the network name has been brought online at
    least once. If this does not correct this issue you will need to delete the
    network name and re-create it.
    - This is definitely related to the problem and the GUID probably got removed when we attempted a fix by resetting the object and trying the repair from the failover cluster manager.
    The user running validate, does not have permissions to create
    computer objects in the 'ad.unlv.edu' domain.
    - This is correct, we run a restricted domain.  I have a delegated OU that I can pre-provision accounts in.  The account was pro-provisioned successfully and was at one point setup and working just fine.
    There are no other errors nor warnings.

  • Server 2008 R2 Failover cluster network configuration

    Hi
    We have a customer with a Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V failover cluster. They have 2 cluster networks, "Cluster Network 1" and "Cluster Network 2".
    "Cluster Network 1": NIC team on 172.16.1.0/24 for private cluster network communication
    "Cluster Network 2": NIC team on 192.168.1.0/24 for production network communication
    I can see that "Cluster Network 1" is configured to "Allow cluster network communication on this network" and "Allow clients to connect through this network".
    If "Cluster Network 1" is ONLY for communication between the to cluster nodes then I assume the selection in "Allow clients to connect through this network" should be removed?
    /Lasse

    It will cause a lost network connection for any client that is accessing through that network.  Those clients would need to reconnect.
    Did you configure both IPs on the cluster resource name that clients are accessing?  If you only configured the one you want, there should be no issue.  If you configured both, then it is possible some clients might be connected via the private
    network.
    Another thing you should, and if you have already done this you will most likely not have issues at all, is that you should disable DNS registration on any network you do not want client access coming through.  If the clients can only find the resource
    through the DNS name registered, that is the way they will be coming in.  In my clusters, which often have 7 or more NICs, there is only one with a published DNS record.
    . : | : . : | : . tim

  • Hyper-V Failover Cluster Networking Configuration After Install

    Hello All,
                Is it possible to install hyper-v and failover or in other words create a hyper-v failover cluster and then configure the networking part of the solution later?  As I am coming into
    terms with the networking part of it, wanted to do it later after the install.  Is it possible?
    And from later configuration, I am trying to say, creation of NIC Team, Virtual NICs, VLAN tagging, etc.

    Hi,
    Failover cluster deployment requires network connectivity between cluster nodes. You can't create a cluster without properly configured TCP\IP on cluster nodes.
    http://OpsMgr.ru/

  • Event Trace Session missing for Failover Cluster

    I have a failover cluster setup and is managed via a Windows Domain controller for the failover cluster network.  I am troubleshooting a potential issue with the failover cluster and the recommendation is to go into event viewer, app & service
    logs, Microsoft, windows and look for failover cluster diagnostics and operations logs and these do not exist. 
    It appears they are created by having an event trace session associated with windows failover clustering but apparently it was't created when the cluster was created for some reason.  I am wondering how to create the proper event trace session
    in order to get these additional failover cluster logs created? 

    Hello,
    the following forum mat be the better one for your needs:
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/home?forum=winserverClustering
    Best regards
    Meinolf Weber
    MVP, MCP, MCTS
    Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
    My Blog: http://blogs.msmvps.com/MWeber
    Disclaimer: This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.
    Twitter:  

  • Can I change which nic is used for a cluster network when more than one nic on the node is on same subnet?

    This cluster has been up and working for maybe a year and a half the way it is.  There are two nodes, running Server 2012.  In addition to a couple network interfaces devoted to VM traffic each node has:
    Management Interface: 192.168.1.0/24
    iSCSI Interface: 192.168.1.0/24
    Internal Cluster Interface: 192.168.99.0/24
    The iSCSI interfaces have to be on same subnet as management interfaces due to limitations in the shared storage.  Basically if I segregate it I wouldn't be able access the shared storage itself for any kind of management or maintenance tasks. 
    I have restricted the iSCSI traffic to only use the one interface on each cluster node but I noticed that one of the cluster networks is connecting the management interface on one cluster node member with the iSCSI interface on the other cluster node member. 
    I would like for the cluster network to be using the management interface on both cluster node members so as not to interfere with iSCSI traffic.  Can I change this?
    Binding order of interfaces is the same on both boxes but maybe I did that after I created the cluster, not sure. 

    Hi MnM Show,
    Tim is correct, if you are using ISCSI Storage and using the network to get to it, it is recommended that the iSCSI Storage fabric have a dedicated and isolated network. This
    network should be disabled for Cluster communications so that the network is dedicated to only storage related traffic.
    This prevents intra-cluster communication as well as CSV traffic from flowing over same network. During the creation of the Cluster, ISCSI traffic will be detected and the network
    will be disabled from Cluster use. This network should set to lowest in the binding order.
    The related article:
    Configuring Windows Failover Cluster Networks
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/askcore/archive/2014/02/20/configuring-windows-failover-cluster-networks.aspx
    I’m glad to be of help to you!
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • Very Strange Network Issue With Two Guests on 2012 R2 Hyper-V Failover Cluster

    Hi all.  We're having a odd issue with two guests on our 2012 R2 failover cluster.  
    In a nutshell, if we shutdown a particular server (I'll call it Server A) another totally different server (Server B) on the same node loses it's network connectivity to the domain. If we start server A back up, network connectivity returns on server B.
    At first I thought server A might be running a service that was somehow linked to server B, so I decided to disable server A's NIC.  Interestingly, that had no affect on server B's connectivity.  
    The next step I tried was pausing server A and again, no adverse affect on server B's connectivity.  
    Next step was to live migrate server A to another node.  This action did
    cause server B to lose its network connection. 
    One other clue is that if I ping server B from either of the Hyper-V hosts in the cluster, I never lose network connection to server B.
    So I would suspect this is some network issue on the cluster, but I'm kind of at a loss where to go from here.  
    Has anyone seen this behavior before or does anyone have any troubleshooting suggestions I can try?
    Thanks! 
    George Moore

    Hi Sir,
    I'v never seen this before .
    >>Next step was to live migrate server A to another node.  This action did
    cause server B to lose its network connection. 
    They are connecting to same virtual switch ?
    First please run cluster validation to check if there is any error .
    If it is ok , please try the following items for troubleshooting :
    1. shutdown  serverA   serverB
    2. then add another virtual NIC for serverB
    3. start server B  check if the issue happens to both "old" and "new" virtual NIC .
    In addition , you can live migrate both A and B to another node , then try to live migrate A to the original node .
    If the issue persists , I would suggest you to remove that virtual switch on both nodes then re-create them .
    Best Regards,
    Elton Ji
    If it is not the answer please unmark it to continue
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected] .

  • Cannot migrate VM in VMM but can in Failover Cluster Manager network adapters network optimization warning

    I have a 4 node Server 2012 R2 Hyper-V Cluster and manage it with VMM 2012 R2.  I just upgraded the cluster from 2012 RTM to 2012 R2 last week which meant pulling 2 nodes out of the existing cluster, creating the new R2 cluster, running the copy
    cluster roles wizard since the VHDs are stored on CSVs, and then added the other 2 nodes after installing R2 on them, back into the cluster.  After upgrading the cluster I am unable to migrate some VMs from one node to another.  When trying to do
    a live migration, I get the following notifications under the Rating Explanation tab:
    Warning: There currently are not network adapters with network optimization available on host Node7. 
    Error: Configuration issues related to the virtual machine VM1 prevent deployment and must be resolved before deployment can continue. 
    I get this error for 3 out of the 4 nodes in the cluster.  I do not get this error for Node10 and I can live migrate to that node in VMM.  It has a green check for Network optimization.  The others do not.  These errors only affect
    VMM. In the Failover Cluster Manager, I can live migrate any VM to any node in the cluster without any issues.  In the old 2012 RTM cluster I used to get the warning but I could still migrate the VMs anywhere I wanted to.  I've checked the network
    adapter settings in VMM on VM1 and they are the same as VM2 which can migrate to any host in VMM.  I then checked the network adapter settings of the VMs from the Failover Cluster Manager and VM1 under Hardware Acceleration has "Enable virtual machine
    queue" and Enable IPsec task offloading" checked.  I unchecked those 2 boxes refreshed the VMs, refreshed the cluster, rebooted the VM and refreshed again but I still could not live migrate VM1.  Why is this an issue now but it wasn't before
    running on the new cluster?  How do I resolve the issue?  VMM is useless if I can't migrate all my VMs with it.

    I checked the settings on the physical nics on each node and here is what I found:
    Node7: Virtual machine queue is not listed (Cannot live migrate problem VM's to this node in VMM)
    Node8: Virtual machine queue is not listed (Cannot live migrate problem VM's to this node in VMM)
    Node9: Virtual machine queue is listed and enabled (Cannot live migrate problem VM's to this node in VMM)Node10: Virtual machine queue is listed and enabled (Live Migration works on all VMs in VMM)
    From Hyper-V or the Failover Cluster manager I can see in the network adapter settings of the VMs under Hardware Acceleration that these two settings are checked "Enable virtual machine queue" and Enable IPsec task offloading".  I unchecked those
    2 boxes, refreshed the VMs, refreshed the cluster, rebooted the VM and refreshed again but I still cannot live migrate the problem VMs.
    It seems to me that if I could adjust those VM settings from VMM that it might fix the problem.  Why isn't that an option to do so in VMM? 
    Do I have to rebuild the VMM server with a new DB and then before adding the Hyper-V cluster uncheck those two settings on the VM's from Hyper-V manager?  That would be a lot of unnecessary work but I don't know what else to do at this point.

  • Hyper-V Failover Cluster - Inconsistent Network Availability

    We've got a Small cluster with, 7 hosts and a dozen or two VM's.  For some reason i'm getting inconsistent availability with the Cluster networks.  The host seem to function fine on there own but theres all types of issues using Migration which
    i'm assuming is because certain hosts think other hosts are unavailable. For Example:
    Cluster Network 1 - From Host 8
    Cluster Network 1 - From Host 10
    As far as I can tell all of the networks are UP. I can ping all hosts on all interfaces.  What criteria goes into determining host availability?

    Hi,
    Maybe you forgot to configure the Live migration Settings,
    In the Failover cluster manager->right click networks-> select the livemigration network.
    Hope this helps.
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Failover Cluster Validation Report Error with IBM USB Remote NDIS Network device

    We are setting up Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Failover Cluster on IBM X3850 X5 and get errors in the Failover cluster Validation Report due to the IBM USB Remote NDIS Network Device is using APIPA adresses and both servers are using same APIPA-adresse.
    How should I configure the Server and OS for the Failover cluster to be MS approved?
    IBM don't recommend that i disable the Network device, but it is a possible solution!?!

    What I did was use ipconfig /all to see the settings it is using and then when and set the ip setting on the NDIS driver to be that except I increment the last value by 1 for each node so that they do not have the same IP address.   I ran the
    cluster validation again and it came up clean and I have not experienced any issues yet.  It does give warnings about it being an Automatic Private IP Address and should not be used, which is ok because we are not going to use it anyways.
    Rich Baumet

  • In Failover Cluster 2008 mailbox2 server network status Unavailable (down).

    Hi 
    I am new here, & hope i can get some help for the below issue
    let me keep it simple scenario 
    i have 2 mailbox server ( mbx01 & mbx02)
    2 cashub Server ( cshb1-cshb2) all running on hyper-v. last week due to some maintenance in data center i have to bring down all the production environment, once the thing are fixed in DC , i started all the server and found out that my exchange node 2 database
    are failed.
    In exchange 2010 failover cluster node ( node2 ) is down network status unavailable. due to by exchange node2 database are failed.
    also i cannot access the file share witness directory from any of the above server.
    can any body assist me on this please 
    thank you 

    Make sure both the DAG members have access to the witness directory. Check the location and make sure you have access. Open the DAG properties from Node2 and try to update the witness server and witness directory. Check the firewall/antivirus of the witness
    server. Try disabling antivirus and firewall. If witness server is not online your databases will go offline. Pleae check
    this
    Get-DatabaseAvailabilityGroup -Identity DAG -Status | fl name,servers,witnessserver,witnessdirectory,alternatewitnessserver,alternatewitnessdirectory,operationalservers,primaryactivemanager,witnessshareinuse
    Thanks, MAS
    Please mark as helpful if you find my comment helpful or as an answer if it does answer your question. That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you.

  • Network DR test causes Exchange DAG network to fail (Failover Cluster Manager reports comms errors)

    We have a DAG configured between 2 mailbox servers, one in each of our main data centres. Our comms team recently performed a DR test between our 2 data centres, switiching from the main production link to the backup link. During this outage the Failover
    Cluster Manager reported errors, with each mailbox server reporting the other as uncontactable. The Events that were logged include the following:
    Isatap interface isatap.{02ADE20A-D5D4-437F-AD00-E6601F7E7A9D} is no longer active. (EventID 4201)
    Cluster node 'MAILBOX_SERVER' was removed from the active failover cluster membership. The Cluster service on this node may have stopped. This could also be due to the node having lost communication with other active nodes in the failover cluster. Run the
    Validate a Configuration wizard to check your network configuration. If the condition persists, check for hardware or software errors related to the network adapters on this node. Also check for failures in any other network components to which the node is
    connected such as hubs, switches, or bridges. (EventID 1135)
    File share witness resource 'File Share Witness (\\WITNESS_SERVER\SHARE_NAME)' failed to arbitrate for the file share '\\WITNESS_SERVER\SHARE_NAME'. Please ensure that file share '\\WITNESS_SERVER\SHARE_NAME' exists and is accessible by the cluster. (EventID
    1564)
    Cluster resource 'File Share Witness (\\\WITNESS_SERVER\SHARE_NAME)' in clustered service or application 'Cluster Group' failed. (EventID 1069)
    The Cluster service is shutting down because quorum was lost. This could be due to the loss of network connectivity between some or all nodes in the cluster, or a failover of the witness disk. Run the Validate a Configuration wizard to check your network
    configuration. If the condition persists, check for hardware or software errors related to the network adapter. Also check for failures in any other network components to which the node is connected such as hubs, switches, or bridges. (EventID 1177)
    The Cluster Service service terminated with service-specific error A quorum of cluster nodes was not present to form a cluster. (EventID 7024)
    The Microsoft Exchange Information Store service terminated unexpectedly.  It has done this 1 time(s).  The following corrective action will be taken in 5000 milliseconds: Restart the service. (EventID 7031)
    Looking at the Cluster Events in the Failover Cluster Manager Snap-In i see a heap of Event ID 47 (cannot activate the DAG databases as the server is not up according to Windows Failover Cluster Service) and:
    Node status could not be recorded. This could prevent some network failure logic from functioning correctly. NodeStatus:IsHealthy=True,HasADAccess=True,ClusterErrorOverrideFalse,LastUpdate=5/2/2011 8:25:42 AMUTC Failure:An Active Manager operation failed.
    Error: An error occurred while attempting a cluster operation. Error: Cluster API '"ClusterRegSetValue() failed with 0x6be. Error: The remote procedure call failed"' failed.. (EventID 184)
    Forcefully dismounting all the locally mounted databases on server 'BACKUP_MAILBOX_SERVER. (EventID 307).
    Our Comms team doesn't believe it is a comms issue as they did not log any network communication errors between the servers in the two sites (using icmp). So if it is not a comms issue, how can I configure the Failover Cluster Manager to be resilient to
    this type of network failover event.
    Thanks
    Dan

    Isn't it also true that in a stretched DAG with even numbered nodes, the PAM needs to be in the same site as the active DAG node?  If the connection between both nodes goes down, and the PAM is in the "passive" site, the primary node will
    dismount the databases since it can't check with the PAM to make sure its safe for it to be up.  
    In a even-numbered node stretched DAG, the PAM changes to the DR/passive site everytime a failover occurs, but doesn't automatically switch back when you reactivate the primary node.

  • HyperV Failover Cluster - twice some vms lost network

    So i run a 4 node Hyper V Failover Cluster and twice now.... out of months of operations out of the blue on a node a portion of the VMs just lose network access(this has happened on two different nodes). I can just pause the node and everything migrates
    off, and then its back up and going. Give it some time and i can unpause and move back. I am looking for ideas on what could be causing this.
    There servers are Dell Power Edge 620 with the latest MS patches and Dell drivers and firmware. On my public side i have a 2 nic team using MS software teaming.

    What are the NICs?
    If Broadcom Netextreme disable VMQ as there's a known issue with them resulting in network loss
    They are broadcom :/ 
    Thanks for the tip.
    I will google around but do you have any links for this information?
    *EDIT*
    http://support2.microsoft.com/kb/2986895

  • Cluster Network 2 is missing from Failover cluster Manager

    I have two node Windows 2008 R2 SP1 MS SQL cluster, there was an issue with one node NIC card which was replaced and since then "Cluster Network 2" is not visible in failover cluster manager, also Heartbeat and Public IP nic card of both nodes
    are appearing in "Cluster Network 1" container. even though both network public and hearbeat are on differenet subnet, but still cluster detects it as one subnet. Need to know how to bring back "Cluster Network 2"

    After replacing NIC, cluster worked fine on other node for couple of days and then cluster services started terminating on both the nodes.
    when checked cluster logs found below error.
    "ERR   [CORE] Node 2: exception caught AlreadyExists(183)' because of 'already exists'(AODBP2DB1 - Local Area Connection)"
    Hence to correct this problem, renamed both nodes NIC cards as Public and Private and cluster was started and tested the failover also. but since then only able to see "Cluster Network 1" and all NIC are listed under this container.
    Though when looked at cluster validation report, it shows Cluster Network 1 and Cluster Network 2 entries in it
    Pasted network section from Cluster Validation report
    Network: Cluster Network 1
    DHCP Enabled: False
    Network Role: Enabled
    Prefix
    Prefix Length
    10.100.18.0
    25
    Item
    Value
    Network Interface
    Node1 - Public
    DHCP Enabled
    False
    IP Address
    10.100.18.11
    Prefix Length
    25
    Item
    Value
    Network Interface
    Node2 - Public
    DHCP Enabled
    False
    IP Address
    10.100.18.16
    Prefix Length
    25
    Network: Cluster Network 2
    DHCP Enabled: False
    Network Role: Internal
    Prefix
    Prefix Length
    10.101.130.0
    25
    Item
    Value
    Network Interface
    Node1 - Private
    DHCP Enabled
    False
    IP Address
    10.101.130.11
    Prefix Length
    25
    Item
    Value
    Network Interface
    Node2 - Private1
    DHCP Enabled
    False
    IP Address
    10.101.130.13
    Prefix Length
    25
    Verifying that each cluster network interface within a cluster network is configured with the same IP subnets.
    Examining network Cluster Network 1.
    Network interface Node1- Public has addresses on all the subnet prefixes of network Cluster Network 1.
    Network interface Node2- Public has addresses on all the subnet prefixes of network Cluster Network 1.
    Examining network Cluster Network 2.
    Network interface Node1- Private has addresses on all the subnet prefixes of network Cluster Network 2.
    Network interface Node2- Private1 has addresses on all the subnet prefixes of network Cluster Network 2.
    Verifying that, for each cluster network, all adapters are consistently configured with either DHCP or static IP addresses.
    Checking DHCP consistency for network: Cluster Network 1. Network DHCP status is disabled.
    DHCP status (disabled) for network interface Node1- Public matches network Cluster Network 1.
    DHCP status (disabled) for network interface Node2- Public matches network Cluster Network 1.
    Checking DHCP consistency for network: Cluster Network 2. Network DHCP status is disabled.
    DHCP status (disabled) for network interface Node1- Private matches network Cluster Network 2.
    DHCP status (disabled) for network interface Node2- Private1 matches network Cluster Network 2.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Cs6 sign in problem

    last night I upgraded to cs6 creative suite and web design from cs.5.5.  install went fine but will not allow sign in to register product. it says, can not connect to Internet or your clock time is wrong.  I spoke with live help last night, they said

  • Adcfgclone.pl on appsTier errors out...

    While running adcfgclone.pl on appsTier we get the following error, at 73% stage ORA-12705 : invalid or unknown nls parameter value specified Regards, Rupdipt

  • Doe a bluetooth wireless keyboard drain the battery?

    Does a bluetooth enabled keyboard drain teh battery of an iPad if left on?

  • SAPINST 'space' error on Solaris 10 Zone

    Hi All, I am attempting to install a 4.7E X 110 system on Oracle 9 and Solaris 10. I am in the CI phase of the installation and am getting an error in phase "Check/Adapt Filesystem". I'm not sure where - it does not say exactly. But the 3 main areas

  • Wait time frequent insert

    Hello This was my exam question and still not sure about the answer You notice there is a very high percentage of wait time for contention event in your Rac database that has frequent insert operations. Which two recommendations may reduce this probl