False/misleading package status

Situation
Our package status often gives us misleading information. I am wondering whether other people experience the same and/or have found solutions (see Data for more details)
Data
- On BPC 5.1 SP5
- Erroneous Status
1) When Progress shows "Completed", it actually fails at "Convert data" step - "Failed in 1 sec"
2) Our data package downloads flat file from BW's FTP server and import to BPC. Sometimes we have new members and the log will show those "rejects". What's weird is that such rejects log don't show consistently. For example, the log file would show "rejects" today, but even if I don't do anything (i.e. adding those rejects as new members to my dimension), the next day the log would "The values in the source data are same as the database". The same flat file is being fed to BPC, and what was rejected still are included in the flat files because we are running on total snapshot rather than "delta".
Question
Has anyone experienced these issues?
Thank you!
Brian

Brian,
Here is my answer.
1. When convert fails in a second, it means data file doesn't exist or something wrong.
2. The values in the source data are same as the database.
    when you import with clear option, data manager compare it with current data in the fact tables before import,
    If it is exactly same, it shows that error message and will not import.
    Why does we need to import exact same data? That's why DM shows that message.
I hope it will help you.
James Lim

Similar Messages

Data Manager Package status Abort

Hi Expert,
I have an excel DM with three parameter, while running DM it get Abort, there is no Log details, inside the log the package status is success, but the same script i run it through UJKT, its running perfectly and its getting correct values.
Please help me the exact problem is with my template, or BADI,
Regards
Vimal Raj

Hi Bhagyesh Ravange,
I did my scope and its working fine, but i try to run it for a all 30 unit through DM again its getting abort, is there any alternative solution is there, please help me to resolve it.
*XDIM_MEMBERSET TEST_TIME AS %TIM% = %TEST_TIME_SET%
*XDIM_MEMBERSET TEST_CATEGORY AS %CAT% = %TEST_CATEGORY_SET%
*XDIM_MEMBERSET TEST_VERSION AS %VER% = %TEST_VERSION_SET%
*XDIM_MEMBERSET TEST_UNIT AS %UT% = %TEST_UNIT_SET% //New Scope
*START_BADI MAN_CALC01
WRITE = ON
TEST_TIME = %TIM%
TEST_CATEGORY = %CAT%
TEST_VERSION = %VER%
TEST_UNIT = %UT%
*END_BADI

{"success":false,"msg":"package file parameter missing"} while trying to upload a package via python

Hello,
I try to write a command line script for administrating CQ5 via command line not using curl or wget. When I try to upload a package I get the following error message: {"success":false,"msg":"package file parameter missing"} So what parameter (sure "file") is missing or how do I have to "put it in"?
To be more precise:
When using curl, everything works fine, so I looked at the header and body curl sends and rebuilt both via python - without success. And curl does not send a "file" parameter by the way, or I didn't see it.
Best regards,
Rene

For RMA Line. I am assuming you have already created a 'RETURN' type transaction Type, and tied that to the AR transaction type. if yes, then just follow the COPY UTILITY to copy the original line into a RMA line using the Copy Utility as below. Let me know if that was helpful.
debug_message('Start Copying order..');
l_copy_rec.api_version_number := 1;
l_copy_rec.init_msg_list := 'T';
l_copy_rec.COMMIT := 'T';
l_copy_rec.Copy_Order := 'T';
l_copy_rec.hdr_count := 1;
l_copy_rec.append_to_header_id:= NULL;
l_copy_rec.hdr_info := 'T';
l_copy_rec.hdr_type := l_refund_order_type_id;
l_copy_rec.hdr_descflex := 'T'; -- changed to 'T'; Dipanjan; 03/06/2012
l_copy_rec.hdr_credit_card_details := 'F';
l_copy_rec.hdr_scredits := 'T';
l_copy_rec.hdr_attchmnts := 'T';
l_copy_rec.hdr_holds := 'F';
l_copy_rec.manual_order_number:= NULL;
l_copy_rec.all_lines := 'F';
l_copy_rec.line_count := l_line_ids.count;
l_copy_rec.line_type :=&l_refund_line_type_id; -- replace with the 'Return' type transaction type Id
l_copy_rec.incl_cancelled := 'T';
l_copy_rec.line_price_mode := 1;
--l_copy_rec.line_price_date := NULL;
-- l_copy_rec.line_discount_id := NULL;
l_copy_rec.line_descflex := 'T';
l_copy_rec.line_scredits := 'F';
l_copy_rec.line_attchmnts := 'T';
l_copy_rec.line_payments := 'T';
l_copy_rec.return_reason_code := 'WRONG ITEM';
l_copy_rec.default_null_values:= 'F';
l_copy_rec.copy_complete_config := 'T';
l_header_id(1).id1 := &l_orig_header_id;--- replace with original header Id
Oe_order_copy_util.copy_order( p_copy_rec => l_copy_rec
,p_hdr_id_tbl => l_header_id
,p_line_id_tbl => l_line_ids
,x_header_id => l_query_header_id
,x_return_status => l_return_status
,x_msg_count => l_msg_count
,x_msg_data => l_msg_data);
debug_message('End Copying order..');

Prestage package status not updating on the server

I have been successful in extracting other prestage packages on DP but for 2 packages, it extract them fine as per the logs and sends the status to the MP as well but the server doesnt reflect the updated status.
prestagecontent.log shows the following
Management Point: 'http://<MP Name>'
Site Code: '<Sitecode>' PrestageContent
DP server: '<DP server name>'
NAL Path: ["Display=\\<DP server name>\"]MSWNET:["SMS_SITE=<sitecode>"]\\<DP server name>\' PrestageContent
Set authenticator in transport PrestageContent
Sent <packageID> package state message to site
End ====
What could be the reason, i have tried to recopy the packages from the original source and tried extracting 2-3 times
using the extraction switch "/f" as well but didnt reflect the status.
Prestage option is already checked.

Distmgr.log has the below entries although they were not in red
Will reject STA for DP ["Display=\\DP server name\"]MSWNET:["SMS_SITE=SITE CODE"]\\DP server name\ as it does not exist in the PkgServers table SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER
7/4/2014 10:07:50 AM 6180 (0x1824)
Will not process this invalid package status file from remote DP ["Display=\\DP server name\"]MSWNET:["SMS_SITE=SITE CODE"]\\DP server name\, delete C:\Program Files\Microsoft Configuration Manager\inboxes\distmgr.box\INCOMING\EAKYPGEC.STA
SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 7/4/2014 10:07:50 AM 6180 (0x1824)
STATMSG: ID=2354 SEV=E LEV=M SOURCE="SMS Server" COMP="SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER" SYS=Primary server name SITE=SITE CODE PID=7420 TID=6180 GMTDATE=Fri Jul 04 04:37:50.055 2014 ISTR0="C:\Program Files\Microsoft Configuration Manager\inboxes\distmgr.box\INCOMING\EAKYPGEC.STA"
ISTR1="["Display=\\DP server name\"]MSWNET:["SMS_SITE=SITE CODE"]\\DP server name\" ISTR2="SITE CODE001C5" ISTR3="" ISTR4="" ISTR5="" ISTR6="" ISTR7="" ISTR8="" ISTR9="" NUMATTRS=2 AID0=400 AVAL0="SITE CODE001C5" AID1=404 AVAL1="["Display=\\DP server name\"]MSWNET:["SMS_SITE=SITE
CODE"]\\DP server name\" SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 7/4/2014 10:07:50 AM 6180 (0x1824)
Successfully delete package status file C:\Program Files\Microsoft Configuration Manager\inboxes\distmgr.box\INCOMING\EAKYPGEC.STA SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER
7/4/2014 10:07:50 AM 6180 (0x1824)
There are no entries in pkgxfermgr.log

[CS3][JS] Difference between link.needed false and link.status LINK_EMBEDDED

Can anyone describe the difference between link.needed being false and link.status being LINK_EMBEDDED? If link.needed is false, doesn't that imply that the link is embedded? What is the distinction with LINK_EMBEDDED? If there is none, which do you recommend?

You can also have links for text files, if you set your preferences accordingly. They'll be neither needed nor embedded. -- Shane Stanley <[email protected]>

Currency Translation- Package Status error

I am encountering the following error after running the currency translation package.
The following is the error message in the package log
RUN LOGIC : Run program error,Message Number : ''''
Failed
Application:Sales Package Status :ERROR
Can some one please tell me what does this error mean and how it can be resolved

HI,
This error has been discussed in many threads here in this forum.
Refer these and see if u can get a solution:
Re: Currency conversion issue.
Re: Currency Conversion Problem
Regards
Navin

User rights to view package status

A few of our Windows admins have been given the rights to create packages and deployments (mainly for the monthly updates).
However, even though they can create and deploy them, they cannot see the package status. So, if they go to: Software Updates-Deployment Packages then select their package, they can expand their package and see Package status. However, if they
click the Package Status folder, there is nothing underneath it when generally it would show the site, then you can see the dp's and if the package is in Install pending, Installed, etc.
They have the following rights:
Site: Read
Deployment packages class: Administer, Create, Delete, Distribute, Manage folders, Modify, Read
Instance: Delete, Distribute, Modify, Read
What am I missing?

It is virtual impossible to get CM07 security fine tuned enough to allow for this type of thing but it is fairly easy to do in CM12. So upgrade to CM12 or push back on the reporting option.
IMO there is nothing wrong with admin review things view the report, plus viewing the reports will have LESS impact on the server that viewing them via the console so.
Garth Jones | My blogs: Enhansoft and
Old Blog site | Twitter:
@GarthMJ

SQL table for Package Status history

Anyone know which SQL table stores the history for non-scheduled packages? I know tblScheduleHistory stores scheduled jobs but can't locate the history seen using "Package Status". This is for 5.0 SP2

Please try tblDTSlog table

Package Status

I am getting "ORA-04068 Existing state of Packages has been discarded" when trying to run a package from a form. Is it because of having Schema name and Package name as same?.

Hi Claus,
First of all - it's possible to make DM package status as Failed from inside custom logic badi: Package status for an "IF_UJ_CUSTOM_LOGIC" badi
Analyze the badi code!
The chain is fine, the script is also fine, the only question with badi parameters:
CATEGORY_KD = (%CATEGORY_KD_SET%)
What for you use brackets () ?
Vadim

Prestage Package status not reflecting on the console

Hello,
I have extracted some prestage packages successfully on the new DP but for some reasons, it doesn’t reflect the status on the primary server. After troubleshooting, I found
this article which describes my issue similarly.
http://eskonr.com/tag/sccm-2012/page/2/
Where it says, “Will reject this STA for DP”, that similarly matches with my concern.
I have followed the article regarding the script for compare the version difference but what I am not sure is, I believe it ultimately says to redistribute the content to
the DP once more ?
Let me know if I am wrong or if there is any other way as this is happening for many prestage packages.
Not sure how it started all of a sudden when it working since a day before.

Hello,
I have created a new prestage package and it extracted successfully as per the below message in Distmgr.log but for some reasons the status doesnt reflect on the console.
Please help as this is really urgent
Processing status update for package AAA SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER
11/12/2014 9:25:21 AM 11344 (0x2C50)
Successfully updated the package server status for ["Display=\\<DP server>\"]MSWNET:["SMS_SITE=SiteID"]\\<DP server>\ for package AAA, Status 3
SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 11/12/2014 9:25:21 AM
11344 (0x2C50)
STATMSG: ID=2330 SEV=I LEV=M SOURCE="SMS Server" COMP="SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER" SYS=<primaryserver>SITE=<SiteID> PID=19600 TID=11344 GMTDATE=Wed Nov 12 03:55:21.886 2014 ISTR0="AAA" ISTR1="["Display=\\<DP
server>\"]MSWNET:["SMS_SITE=<SiteID>"]\\<DP server>\" ISTR2="" ISTR3="" ISTR4="" ISTR5="" ISTR6="" ISTR7="" ISTR8="" ISTR9="" NUMATTRS=2 AID0=400
AVAL0="AAA" AID1=404 AVAL1="["Display=\\<DP server>\"]MSWNET:["SMS_SITE=<SiteID>"]\\<DP server>\"
SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 11/12/2014 9:25:21 AM
11344 (0x2C50)
Successfully delete package status file C:\Program Files\Microsoft Configuration Manager\inboxes\distmgr.box\INCOMING\BKP96Y8Q.STA
SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 11/12/2014 9:25:21 AM
11344 (0x2C50)

SCCM 2012 SP1 CU4 migrated DP shows package status "unknown"

I have a SCCM 2012 SP1 CU4 environment and have shared SCCM 2007 distribution points.
Today I migrated one of the DP's which seems to work well.
However all my packages shows now the status "unknown" for this migrated DP.
This is a problem which should be fixed in CU4 according to the CU4 description. But it is not :-(
Any idea how to solve this ? R2 install ?

Some additional information:
I noticed that the package sources are still available at the "old" ditribution point share abd not on the new sccm 2012 distribution point share. When performing actions described in step 3 below the package becomes available on the distribution point
share......then i guess i can remove the content from the "old" distribution point share ????
I noticed that when a package got the status "unknown" for de migrated DP the following action fix the problem:
--> i remove the DP from the package and immediately add it again, the package status becomes "Successful".....hummm....ok....maybe a script could be created for this
I noticed that when a package got the status "unknown" and the package is also located on the "distribution point share" then following will fix the issue:
--> edit the package and remove the migrated DP and remove the checkbox for string on the distribution point share. Then add the DP again, click Apply and then set the checkbox for storing on the distribution point share and Apply again. Then wait and package
will become available Successful and the package will become available on the distribution point share
But i have 800 packages and 50 to be migrated DP's.....this is not a solution....but what is ????
Any help, ideas, tips, hints, recommendations ?
My overal thoughts are that migrating of a SCCM 2007 DP is not really working at all !!!!!
Or does someone has other experience with e.g. R2 installed ? If so then I will upgrade first...

Package status not appended in the Add Remove Programs in control panel after the installation.

Hi,
I have a strange problem with "Package status not appended in the Add Remove Programs after the installation.".
Like, onec the package is installed via SCCM, it should be listed in the Add Remove programs with the package name, version and the install date.
At times on random machine these details are not appended. Although the application works fine on the machine, but the correct details are not populated in Add/ Remove programs.
There is no issue with the package as it shows correct details on few other machine where it is installed.
This behaviour is random on random machines. Hence, very difficult to track the reason.
System Security analyst at CapG

Hi Jason,
Yes, i have tried Jorgen's suggestion, ans as said earlier. It install the application smoothly on any other machine (any random machine) perfectly with correct details in Add Remove Programs.
As mentioned earlier, the same package, same environment, same set of machines with same OS, it installs correctly on few machines.. and on few its just misses to add correct details in Add Remove progs.
If it was related to package, how does it install corretly on other machines?? How does the same package installs correctly when done manually or by that means by PSEXEC.
To a matter of fact, we are checking our package for the multiple times now, just to make sure it is buldled correctly with correct install scripts. We are trying to search different multiple ways to see what makes the package to skip the
correct entry in the Add Remove.
To add, this is not with one package, it happens with random package with random machine. There is not typical behaviour that could be tracked.
All the installations done via SCCM 07, with admin account.
This looks more tricky and complex then as simple as saying, its the fault of packaging.
I hate to say this but this is NOT a CM07 problem, You will need to work with your packaging team, and use tools like process monitor,psexec and the msi log to determine why it is failing.
Your first step is to find a pc where you can consistent get the setup to fails. once you get that you can use process monitor and the msi log files to determine what is going on.
Garth Jones | My blogs: Enhansoft and
Old Blog site | Twitter:
@GarthMJ

Import package status with successful when all the data have been rejected

Dear all,
We use the import package to import some data files. We check that the status is successful , but all the data are rejected. Is it possible to set the status to error when there are reject records in the data file?
Best Regards,
Jeff

Try to set the MAXREJECTCOUNT parameter in the transformation file to -1. This will create an error or warning if you have rejected records.
Hope this helps.
-Joost

Document Distribution order package status IW?

Hi
I am working on document distribution. the workflow is starting very well but fails to proceed at the status IW. On top of the order staus, there is a message "Not assigned to distr. order package". I am failing to troubleshoot it. Any ideas, transactions and assistance to resolve this will be highly appreciated.
Kind regards

Hi,
Can you make sure that checkbox for 'distribute immediately' indicator is ticked when you start distribution using Txn CVI8? If not, you will have to make appropriate settings in customizing.
Hope this resolves the issue.
Regards,
Pavana

Package status shown invalid

Hi,
I am facing the below error,
ORA-04061: existing state of package body "TBM.PAYBACK" has been invalidated
ORA-06508: PL/SQL could not find program unit being called "TBM.PAYBACK"
Status of the package,
select status,object_name, owner from dba_objects where object_name='PAYBACK' and owner = 'TBM';
status object_name owner
invalid PAYBACK public
valid PAYBACK tbm
valid PAYBACK tbm
For TBM user it shows status "valid" and PUBLIC user "invalid"
So is the package valid or invalid.
Connecting as sys tried to compile the package and the package body.. it gets compiled successfully.
But the above sql query still show the same output.
Please guide.

You're welcome,
Since you got an answer and was satisfied with that, you really should close the thread.
Doing that would even improve your somewhat poor statistics
Handle:      A-K
Status Level:      Newbie
Registered:      Aug 5, 2007
Total Posts:      212
Total Questions:      104 *(97 unresolved)*

False/misleading package status

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for