FEH for File Interfaces?

Hello Experts,
Can we use Forward Error Handling (FEH) for implementing error handling in File Interfaces ?
Like for simple Application Server file interfaces, if something goes wrong during the process of writing/reading a file on App Server, can we use FEH for showing the log?
I know it is a concept used for PI...so we want to know if it can be used for file interfaces as well? Just want to keep similar approach for error handling and logging (for both PI and File Interfaces).
Thanks.

Edit 1 May 2015: Added inbound
Just a slight correction.
FEH is used in the ABAP backend systems and are only for asynchronous inbound proxy interfaces. It is not available for sync proxies, IDocs, BAPIs. Neither is it available for any error handling on the PI system itself.
PI/XI: Forward Error Handling (FEH) for asynchronous proxy calls with the use of Error and Conflict Handler (ECH)
Message was edited by: Eng Swee Yeoh

Similar Messages

  • Inbound for File Interface.

    Hi,
    I need  a sample code for inbound interface via file interface.Can any send the code.
    Thanks
    Raj

    Can you please try with these functionmodules???
    1)ITS_DIRECTORY_LIST_FILES
    2)CL_GUI_FRONTEND_SERVICES=>DIRECTORY_LIST_FILES

  • Forward Error Handling - File interfaces?

    Hello Experts,
    Can we use Forward Error Handling (FEH) for implementing error handling in File Interfaces ?
    Like for simple Application Server file interfaces, if something goes wrong during the process of writing/reading a file on App Server, can we use FEH for showing the log?
    I know it is a concept used for PI...so we want to know if it can be used for file interfaces as well? Just want to keep similar approach for error handling and logging (for both PI and File Interfaces).
    Thanks.

    Edit 1 May 2015: Added inbound
    Just a slight correction.
    FEH is used in the ABAP backend systems and are only for asynchronous inbound proxy interfaces. It is not available for sync proxies, IDocs, BAPIs. Neither is it available for any error handling on the PI system itself.
    PI/XI: Forward Error Handling (FEH) for asynchronous proxy calls with the use of Error and Conflict Handler (ECH)
    Message was edited by: Eng Swee Yeoh

  • File interfaces

    hi friend's,
    i want to code for file interfacing in different system to sap like
    mainfram, java  \[removed by moderator\]
    THAKNS  AND REGRADS
    Edited by: Jan Stallkamp on Sep 3, 2008 3:52 PM

    Hi Vikash,
    Check this link:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_di46c2/helpdata/EN/dc/6b7f6343d711d1893e0000e8323c4f/content.htm
    Hope this helps you.
    Regards,
    Chandra Sekhar

  • Hi all, i'm new and facing a problem while creating a new file for Xcode. I can't select the box "with XIB for user interface" if the subclass is "UIViewController".this problem happen after i upgrade Xcode to 4.6 version.Appreciate for any help rendered.

    Hi all, i'm new to Mac book & Xcode. I'm learning and facing problems while creating a new file for Xcode. Before i upgrade the software, i have no issue to create simple steps in apps. After upgrade Xcode to 4.6 version, i'm facing lot's of issue eg.
    1) "the identity "iphone developer" doesn't match any valid certificate/ private key pair",
    2) can't select the box "with XIB for user interface" if the subclass is "UIViewController"..
    Appreciate for any help rendered.

    Mikko777 wrote:So what is the best?
    I wouldn't judge. I've been to Arch for a week, you know? But as said, it's VERY close to it.
    What I dislike after a week is makepkg not handling dependencies automatically (which would be overhead, so probably not appropriate).
    Mikko777 wrote:Also theres KDEmod for modular kde, dunno if its for 64 bits tho.
    Don't actually need that as said ... I see no real benefit of having that other than not beeing a KDE user or having Gentoos useflags.
    Mikko777 wrote:PS:You produce a lot of text and welcome smile
    Yeah. Wonder why I'm still employed? So do I ...

  • Creation of Server Proxy for  Message interface with External Defination

    Dear All,
    I am getting a problem while generating a server proxy for the inbound interface . The request message used in the inbound interface is a external definition which is uploaded using a XSD file. The XSD file was supplied by a third party which is having very high complex strucuture and used lot of abstract data types in the design. When i tried to generate the proxy in the R/3 system (Transaction SPROXY) for the inbound interface i am getting following error.
    Interface uses external and internal message definitions
    Message no. SPRX122 *
    Diagnosis
    In a message interface you can use messages from different sources:
    Message types and fault message types edited in the Enterprise Services Repository
    Messages imported into the Enterprise Services Repository (external definitions, RFC, IDoc)
    In the current message interface, message types from different sources have been used. Since messages from these different sources must be handled differently during proxy generation, such a mixture of messages within a message interface is not possible.
    System Response
    The interface cannot be generated.
    Procedure
    Change the interface definition accordingly in the Enterprise Services Repository.
    Please guide me, how to generate the proxy for the interface with external defination message. I could nt geneate manullay, because it is having very high complexity and its a big structure.
    Is there is any way to generate the proxy for interface with external definition
    Regards
    Vijayanand

    Hi,
    i.       Import your message schemas from external definitions, or RFCs or IDocs from SAP systems. These definitions already contain data types.
    ii.       Create a message interface and reference the messages of the external definition, or the RFC or IDoc message.
    Check this, it may help you
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/3f/01623c4f69b712e10000000a114084/content.htm
    REgards
    Seshagiri

  • URGENT! File Upload Utility or a Custom UI for File Upload is needed!

    Hi all,
    I'm trying to find or develop a file upload utility or custom user interface rather than editing and adding file type item to a page. There is a free portlet for file upload in Knowledge Exchange resources, but it is for 3.0.9 release. I'm using portal 9.0.2.
    I could not any sample about the new release. Also API such as wwsbr_api that is used to add item to content areas is out dated.
    I create a page with a region for "items". When "edit" page and try to add an "file" type item the generated url is sth like this;
    "http://host:7779/pls/portal/PORTAL.wwv_additem.selectitemtype****"
    After selecting item type as a simple file autogenerated url is sth. like ;
    "http://host:7779/pls/portal/PORTAL.wwv_add_wizard.edititem"
    I made search about these API but could not find anything (in PDK PL/SQL API help, too).
    I need this very urgent for a proof of consept study for a customer.
    Thanks in advance,
    Kind Regards,
    Yeliz Ucer
    Oracle Sales Consultant

    Answered your post on the General forum.
    Regards,
    Jerry
    PortalPM

  • How to create the Export Data and Import Data using flat file interface

    Hi,
    Request to let me know based on the requirement below on how to export and import data using flat file interface.....
    Please provide the steps involved for the same.......
    BW/BI - Recovery Process for SNP data. 
    For each SNP InfoProvider,
    create:
    1) Export Data:
    1.a)  Create an export data source, InfoPackage, comm structure, etc. necessary to create an ASCII fixed length flat file on the XI
    ctnhsappdata\iface\SCPI063\Out folder for each SNP InfoProvider. 
    1.b)  All fields in each InfoProvider should be exported and included in the flat file. 
    1.c)  A process chain should be created for each InfoProvider with a start event. 
    1.d)  If the file exists on the target drive it should be overwritten. 
    1.e)  The exported data file name should include the InfoProvider technical name.
    1.f)  Include APO Planning Version, Date of Planning Run, APO Location, Calendar Year/Month, Material and BW Plant as selection criteria.
    2) Import Data:
    2.a) Create a flat file source system InfoPackage, comm structure, etc. necessary to import ASCII fixed length flat files from the XI
    ctnhsappdata\iface\SCPI063\Out folder for each SNP InfoProvider.
    2.b)  All fields for each InfoProvider should be mapped and imported from the flat file.
    2.c)  A process chain should be created for each InfoProvider with a start event. 
    2.d)  The file should be archived in the
    ctnhsappdata\iface\SCPI063\Archive directory.  Each file name should have the date appended in YYYYMMDD format.  Each file should be deleted from the \Out directory after it is archived. 
    Thanks in advance.
    Tyson

    Here's some info on working with plists:
    http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/PropertyLists/Introduc tion/chapter1_section1.html
    They can be edited with any text editor. Xcode provides a graphical editor for them - make sure to use the .plist extension so Xcode will recognize it.

  • Peformance Turning for File Download / Upload with Enabled SharePoint Audit

    Greetings all, may I ask your help for Peformance Issues?
    Background:
    I tried to create a ASP.NET Web Page to download/upload/list SharePoint file and deployed to IIS website in same application server (will NOT use web part as some users are NOT allowed to direct access confidential workspace)
    Besides, for Audit Log record purpose, the page will impersonate (without password) the logged in user:
    SPUserToken userToken = web.AllUsers[user].UserToken;
    SPSite s = new SPSite(siteStr, userToken);
    For File Listing, the web service can provide fast response, and we are using service A/C for connection (as no auting for listing, but require audit for file download upload)
    Several implemeation options tested for File Downloiad / Upload, but issues occured and finding listed below:
    Issues
    1) SharePoint Object Model
    When I open Site (using new SPSite), it's too slow to respond. (under 1s for all operations, but require 10~50s for open SPSIte. e.g.
    using(SPSite s = new SPSite(siteStr) //50s
    How can I download/upload file without open SPSite object (using SharePoint object model, but user token should be kept to allow SHarePoint identifiy user actions. e.g. Updated by Tom, NOT system administrator)?
    2) SharePoint default web service
    For file download, I tried to use SharePoint Web Service for download file, it's quick but how can SharePoint record the audit log to downloaded user, and not service A/C? ( e.g. View by Tom, NOT system administrator)
    With Windows SSO solution, please note system should NOT prompt to ask user password for use impersonation
    3) HTTP Request API (for file download)
    As mentioned in point 2, if the system cannot get password from user, SharePoint also recorded service A/C in audit log... ><
    Thank you for your kine attention.
    .NET Beginner 3.5

    Thank you for prompt response, please find my reply with Underline:
    Hi,
    Maybe I'm not quite clear about the architecture you have now.
    Is your asp.net application deployed in separate IIS site but in the same physical server as SharePoint?
    Yes
    "we are using service A/C for connection", can you please explain the 'A/C'?
    Domain User, Local Admin and also SharePoint Service Admin A/C
    Opening SPSite is relatively slower but shouldn't take 50 sec. However it depends on your server hardware configuration. You should meet the minimum hardware requirements for SharePoint.
    Assigned double resources based on minimum hardware requirements.
    For details, 50s is the load test result. But for other SharePoint operation, it takes around/under 3s reponse time.
    Are you using SharePoint Audit log? Exactly If so then why don't you just put the hyperlink to the documents in your asp.net page. User maybe have to login once in SharePoint site but
    it depends on your security architecture. For example if both of your sites in local intranet and you are using windows integrated authentication, SSO will work automatically  User is NOT allowed
    to access SharePoint site/server (not implemented for sepreate server yet, as performance issues occured for
    separate site in same server)  directly from Internet, the
    middle server with web interface created for user request.
    Whatever I understands gives me the feeling that you download the file using HTTPWebRequest C# class. However regarding security it depends on how authentication is setup in asp.net web site and in sharepoint. If both site uses windows integrated security
    and they are in the same server, you can use the following code snippet:
    using (WebClient webClient = new WebClient())
    webClient.Credentials = System.Net.CredentialCache.DefaultNetworkCredentials;
    webClient.DownloadFile("file ur in sharepoint", "download directory");
    Thanks, will try and reply later
    But still, as I've mentioned, not quite clear about the whole architecture.
    A) Request Handling
    1) User use browser to request file listing and/or download file (hereafter called: File Download Request) from custom ASP.NET page (Let's say In Server 1, IIS 1)
    2) ASP.NET page  or File Handler ashx (Server 1, IIS 1) call custom web service, SharePoint deault/OOTB web service or using SharePoint Object Model to access SharePoint Document Library (in Server 1,
    IIS 2)
    3) Both SharePoint and IIS Web Site
    (Server 1, IIS 1 & IIS2) using the same service A/C
    4) The web service , File Handler return file obeject to IIS1
    5) IIS 1 reply File Download Request to user
    B) Application Architecture (In testing environment)
    1) no load balancing
    2) 1 DB server (Server 2)
    3) 1 Application Server (with IIS 1 - ASP.NET, IIS 2, SharePoint Web Site with default SharePoint Web Service, IIS 3 SharePoint Admin Site & IIS 4 Custom SharePoint Web Service)
    4) Sepreate AD Server (Server 3)
    Thanks,
    Sohel Rana
    http://ranaictiu-technicalblog.blogspot.com
    .NET Beginner 3.5

  • N:1 Multimapping For Files

    Hi All,
    I am doing N:1 multimapping for files.
    I have 2 senders and 1 receiver.
    I created 2 sender interfaces and 1 receiver interface.
    I did message mapping in which I added 2 sender message types in source and added the target message type.
    I did Interface mapping with 2 sender message interface and 1 receiver interface.
    But i faced problem when creating configurations in ID.
    (a) I am not able to understand how many interface determination/Receiver determinations are required.
    (b) Again I am not getting interface mapping in Interface Determination .
    So can anyone help me to solve this?
    Thanks
    Rabi

    Hi,
    You can use any of the collect message pattern provided. In your case any one of the following can be used:
    1. BpmPatternCollectMessage
    2. BpmPatternCollectTime
    ->There are some patterns in SWC : SAP BASIS --> namespace : http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/Patterns In ESR of your SAP PI System.
    -> please go through this blogs it will help you.
    Correlation – Runtime Behavior of BPM.
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/10526. [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
    In Configuration By using of BPM.
    -> two communication channels one for sender and one for receiver
    -> 2 receiver Determinations
              one for Sender to IP.
                One for IP to Receiver.
    -> 2 Interface Dtermination
             one for Sender to Ip
             one for IP two Receiver
    -> 1 Sender agrement.
    -> 1 receiver agrement for (IP to Receiver)
    regards,
    ganesh.

  • Communication between thread in the same process using file interface.

    Hi,
    I am developing  driver and i need to communicate between two thread.
    >can anyone guide me on implementing communication between two thread in the same process using File Interface. First thread will be driver and second will be application.I need to send IOCTL like commands using File interface ie is WriteFile(),ReadFile()
    from Host process to driver through file-interface(which run's in driver context).Host process should not be blocked for the duration of the driver to process the command.
    >File-interface will run in driver context and it will be responsible to receive command from application and pass it to the driver.
    what are the complexity introduced?
    >Can anyone also give me the link/reference to get more information on this topic?
    >How to replace IOCTL command's for instance baud _rate change command with a file interface for example with IRP.

    Here  is the detailed query:
    Hardware Abstraction Layer will interact with Driver(Both will be running in complete different process) .there is a IOCTL for command and  File interface for read and write.
    My requirement is:
    Both should run in the same process so HAL will run as one thread and driver as another thread in the same process .I don't want HAL to wait for completion of request and also i don't want driver to be blocked .
    We are planning to use a File Interface for communication between Hardware abstraction layer and Driver
    HAL will send the command or read/write operation to a file interface and driver will get the command or read/write request from the File interface
    There is a flexibility to change Hardware Abstraction layer and also the Driver
    Is it possible to use IOCTL between two thread under same process? if not what other options do we have.
    Can we use File interface to  send command (like IOCTL) between two thread?

  • Role Assignment Discovery Issue for Files and Folders through Sharepoint REST services

    To preface, I am a decided Sharepoint newbie in every sense. I am trying to use the Sharepoint REST services (Sharepoint 2013) to walk the folder and file structure of my Sharepoint server and, determine as I go, the Role Assignments (and subsequently
    Permissions) on those folders and files. I'm using an Administrator credentials and I'm actually able to successfully do it but I've run into some caveats. All the caveats begin with this; when I'm examining a folder, for example:
    /_api/Web/GetFolderByServerRelativeUrl('/sites/cmisdev/Development')/ListItemAllFields
    I receive either an empty list or an error response doc when following the link supplied for ListItemAllFields.  When following that kind of link for folders, I either get:
    <d:ListItemAllFields
    m:null="true"
    />
    or an error response document that says "The object specified does not belong to a list." When I hit the /ListItemAllFields endpoint for files, I receive a response with a link for Role Assignments which subsequently also works and I get the
    info I need. So, is this a bug? Why does the link returned from Sharepoint work for files and not folders? So, google, google, google, and I discover that there is another possible way to get at the Role Assignments (and that the object does, indeed, belong
    to a list!).
    If I know the Title (or the guid) of the folder in question, I can use the following endpoint:
    /_api/Web/Lists/GetByTitle('Development')
    If I use that endpoint, I get the information I would have expected to get from following /ListItemAllFields and the subsequent Role Assignments links all work and I get what I need. If there's a bug and this is how I have to work around it, that's fine
    but I have yet to discover how to dynamically determine the Title of a given folder nor am I sure if all Titles are supposed to be unique within a given Sharepoint server. I'm assuming that the folder name as represented in the server relative URL and the
    Title may be different and this is where my newbishness may start to shine if I'm misunderstanding what a "List" is supposed to be in Sharepoint. Anyway, I did find that I could use the Properties endpoint to perhaps get the Title, for example:
    /_api/Web/GetFolderByServerRelativeUrl('/sites/cmisdev/Development')/Properties
    gives me:
    <d:vti_x005f_listtitle>Development</d:vti_x005f_listtitle>
    whose value I assume I could then supply to the /GetByTitle endpoint and be golden. However, "vti_x005f_listtitle" just sounds a little too deep to be something I should be relying on but maybe that's kosher. That's part of what I'm trying to
    find out. Also, if there is a way to use the Sharepoint REST API to discover the guid of a given object, then I could look it up in that way.
    So, in summary:
    1. Am I going about getting folder Role Assignment information in the wrong way? Based on the CSOM examples I've seen, I believe I'm doing it correctly and that the answer to #2 below is a resounding "Yes!" :)
    2. Is it a bug if I'm not able to use /ListItemAllFields on folders using the server relative url?
    3. If I'm supposed to use GetByTitle as a workaround, am I discovering that Title correctly through /Properties? Seems quite circuitous and awkward. Are Titles required to be unique throughout a given Sharepoint server?
    4. If I'm supposed to use the guid, how can I use the REST interface to discover an object's guid? Once we get down to the Role Assignments and other links, the guid appears in those links but I don't know how to discover it independently if that's the
    path I should use to get the data I described above.

    Upon further research, I'll answer my own question for the benefit of some other potential future newbie.  The answer to question number 1 above is "Not exactly.".  The server relative URLs I was using corresponded to lists (which are
    returned as a collection through /_api/web/lists).  I was treating them mentally like regular folders.  That, coupled with the fact that accessing their data as I showed above returns a ListItemAllFields link, made me think that was the way to get
    the Role Assignments just as I would for files and, as it turns out, "real" folders and sub-folders created under these lists.  That was the other problem with thinking of these lists as regular folders.  So, ListItemAllFields works on
    all files and folders in a list.  However, if you want Role Assignments for the lists themselves, you can keep track of the Titles and\or Guids from the /_api/web/lists that you're interested in (in my case, all non-hidden "document library"
    type lists) and then access those Role Assignments as I discussed in questions 3 and 4 above.  For example, from the /_api/web/lists collection from my test server, the "Development" document library Role Assignments are accessable via /_api/Web/Lists(guid'cd242eeb-aafa-4efa-aecc-9bbdf8e3d459')/RoleAssignments
    or /_api/Web/Lists/GetByTitle('Development')/RoleAssignments.

  • Custom panels for File Info.

    Hi, everydoby.
    This is my first post to this group and I wanted to say hello to everybody. Hello !!!
    While doing some reading on Adobe's site I came across an application named Configurator 1.0. This application allows users to develop custom panels for Photoshop and it seems to design custom menus for the interface. I am interested in finding out if it can be used to design custom File Info panels for Photoshop. In case it can't is there another application that can do it and has a GUI that makes it easy to use and simple for someone with little programming experience ?
    Thank you,
    Joe

    Hello, Michael.
    I think you are right.
    I've looked at the Adobe's website for information on how to build these panels and it seems far more complicated then it should be. Unfortunately Adobe doesn't seem to get that most users are NOT programmers. The information is complex and extensive, far more than it should be for someone who just wants to add a little amount of customization to his/her applications.
    My idea was to find a simple GUI application that would allow the average user (myself) to create custom panels for the File Info menu option but one such application doesn't seem to be available. The options are to either immerse myself in the time-consuming, technically-demanding documentation available in the company's website or give up the project entirely.
    Thanks again for your help.
    Joe Caldwell.

  • Issue with the sender file interfaces when using UTF-8 files

    Hello experts,
         We are having number of File to SAP interface scenarios in our business process. In the past, we are having the files coming to us in ASCII text format. Recently, because of the business process change(to handle multiple languages like Chinese), we are getting now the same files in UTF-8 format. So, we have changed the attribute File Type in the sender communication channel from Binary to Text and used encoding format as UTF-8.
    Now, when we see the processed files in PI, we are missing the Header record in the message. For example, we have the PO interface in the following format:
    Identifier     Information
    H     PO header information
    I     PO Item information
    I     PO Item information
    Once the file adapter picks this format kind of file and when we see the XML message in PI, it is just having only two Items information. The header part is not coming to PI at all and the message is trying to get processed inside SAP and therefore interface is failing.
    Additional observations made:
    u2022     We have checked the Document Offset field value too; it is initial for the interface.
    u2022     We added an empty line in the UTF-8 text file, it worked fine. But, this is not an ideal solution for us, because the system which generates these files, canu2019t handle it.
       Does any one has observed this kind of problem before? If so, can you please help me ...
    Thanks,
    Adithya K

    Thanks for all the information. Currently i've tried to use both modules (TextCodepageConversionBean and XMLAnonymizerBean) in my Sender File Adapter, but for now without any result...
    To describe the situation: i am using flatfiles which i am fetched from the file system (NFS) by the Sender File Adapter. To translate the characters to the XML strucutre, the File Content Conversion protocol is been used.
    The content conversion defines the structure base on the first two characters on each row in the flat file. This worked fine till one of our suppliers is delivering BOM characters like "EF BB BF" in the beginning of the file.The content conversion is not able to recognize my header characters in this situation, which will normally start with "01".
    Any suggestions?

  • FTPS or SFTP for file scenario. Suggstions

    Hi,
    I have searched blog in sdn but do not get good blogs/links.
    For File scenario which to use FTPS or SFTP.
    How to do the configuration in XI and Visual admin.
    Full points will be awarded.

    Hi,
    1) SFTP (Secure File Transfer Protocol)
    "SSH File Transfer Protocol" or SFTP is a network protocol that provides file transfer and manipulation functionality over any reliable data stream. It is typically used with the SSH-2 protocol to provide secure file transfer. SFTP encrypts the session, preventing the casual detection of username, password or anything that is being transmitted. One key benefit to SFTP is its ability to handle multiple secure file transfers over a single encrypted pipe. By using a single encrypted pipe, there are fewer holes in the corporate firewall.
    SFTP:
    As per the latest SAP PI/XI support pack, it does not support SFTP via File Adapter.
    So alternative approach to cater this requirement from XI is to make use of Unix Script at OS level to transfer the files from/to third-party systems.
    Inbound Interface - i.e. third-party system ->XI->SAP: 
    File is transferred to a folder in SAP XI landscape from the third-party legacy system using UNIX Script with secured protocol. Once the file is ready in the XI landscape, File Adapter will poll this directory and file is picked up by NFS protocol.
    Outbound Interface – i.e. SAP->XI->third-party system: 
    XI is responsible for writing a file into a folder in the XI landscape. These files are transferred to the third-party system by executing UNIX scripts with secured protocol i.e. via sFTP.
    Pre-Requisites: 
    Public key should be exchanged between external systems and the PI system.
    UNIX shell script has to be developed and scheduled.
    Advantages: 
    Highly Secured.
    Ability to handle multiple secure file transfers over a single encrypted pipe .By using a single encrypted pipe, there are fewer holes in the corporate firewall.
    Disadvantages:
    Two-Step process i.e. XI>Temporary folder>External System and vice-versa
    Files have to be temporarily stored in XI server.
    Multiple failure points i.e. XI and Unix script execution
    Maintenance of an external UNIX script.
    Difficulty in monitoring the execution of the shell script as it cannot be monitored thru XI.
    Need to generate keys and install it in the SFTP site as a pre-requisite i.e. SFTP clients must install keys on the server.
    SFTP uses keys rather than certificates. This means that it can't take advantage of the "chains of trust" paradigm facilitated through Certificate Authorities.
    Files from the XI server should be deleted/archived in a periodic manner to increase the disc space so that it will increase the performance.
    Note: UNIX shell Script can be executed as a background job ‘or' can be triggered from SAP XI through OS command at File adapter level.
    Secure FTP (SSH) with the FTP Adapter
    Secured File Transfer using SAP XI
    Secure FTP in SAP XI
    SFTP (FTP over SSH) in XI
    /people/krishna.moorthyp/blog/2007/07/31/sftp-vs-ftps-in-sap-pi
    encryption adapters or how to secure data
    /people/krishna.moorthyp/blog/2007/07/31/sftp-vs-ftps-in-sap-pi
    Regards,
    Phani
    Reward points if Helpful

Maybe you are looking for