Field-level Edit Access

Hello everyone,
I have 4 questions, all pertaining to what you can do with a field in APEX:
First, how to enable field-level Edit access in APEX? I understand I can apply authorization scheme on each page. So when a user has only View access, he/she can't edit the page. This is nice but what if out of a page, I want only one field being editable by an Administrator and not by the other groups, how do I do this?
Second, if I want an Administrator to be able to add a row to a pop-up LOV and he's a mere administrative user of the system and not the APEX administator, how best it is to do this?
Third, when a user logs in, how to ensure his login name and perhaps today's date already appear in a field?
Finally, when a field is filled in, how to disable that field from future modification by shading it for example?
Thanks for enlightening me on this.
Best regards,
Daniel

Sagar has the point. You should check the OES and OAM certification for all versions you want to use. AFAIK OAM 11g and OES 10.3.4 run on WLS 10.3.3 only.
See the certifications for details: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/ias/downloads/fusion-certification-100350.html
--olaf

Similar Messages

Make Item level field Non-Editable in VA01

Dear Experts,
        I have a requirment to make ITEM Category field in item level of VA01
        make Non-editable based on the value of Sale order Type in the main screen
i am using Program MV45AFZZ to make necessary changes i am able change any thing on the header level but i am not geting the control of item level Please suggest me how to change or make fields non-editable in Item level.

Hi,
Try writing code in FORM userexit_field_modification.
*** Lock field pricing date in SO if delivery occured
IF   screen-name = 'VBAP-PSTYV' AND
       sy-tcode NE 'VA01' AND l VBAK-AUART EQ 'your document type'.
      screen-input = 0.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM.                    "USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION
KR Jaideep,

User Exit to make Payment Term field non editable in item level .

Hi all,
User wants to make the Payment Term field in sales order as non editable and Payment terms is copied from Customer Master to Sales order.
I use user exit MV45AFZZ (USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION) to make Payment Term field non editable in header level.
I am not able to do it in item level. Pl help to to make Payment Term field non editable in item level.
Thanks,
sunil

Hi,
You can try implicit enhancement in the include MV45AF0T_TCTRL_U_ERF_AUFTRAG_I
use below code.
DATA: WA_COLS LIKE LINE OF TCTRL_U_ERF_AUFTRAG-COLS.
   LOOP AT   TCTRL_U_ERF_AUFTRAG-COLS INTO WA_COLS.
   IF WA_COLS-SCREEN-NAME = 'VBAP-ZTERM'. " Check the field name
   WA_COLS-SCREEN-INPUT = 0.
   WA_COLS-SCREEN-OUTPUT = 1.
MODIFY TCTRL_U_ERF_AUFTRAG-COLS FROM WA_COLS.
   ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
It better to control it via a custom authorization object.
put a authorization create a custom authorization object so that you can restrict it for a certain users.
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'ZTERM'
         ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '02'.
IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
   LOOP AT   TCTRL_U_ERF_AUFTRAG-COLS INTO WA_COLS.
ENDLOOP.
ENDIF.
Regards
Aromal

Field level Access - OAM

Hi all,
I would like to know whether it is possible to provide field level access to an application using Oracle Access Manager.
Please let me know..!!
Thanks

Sagar has the point. You should check the OES and OAM certification for all versions you want to use. AFAIK OAM 11g and OES 10.3.4 run on WLS 10.3.3 only.
See the certifications for details: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/ias/downloads/fusion-certification-100350.html
--olaf

Incorrect functionality in edit access level

We are assigning the Instructor credential with the Edit Access Level permissions. However when an Instructor authenticates, they do not have the EDIT ACCESS permission in their course.
In the iTunes U admin guide, it state:
Users with Edit access to a Course page can also use the Access pop-up menu in the Access area within a Course page to define group-level access for the page. The user can assign group-level access for other users of the Course page, but cannot change his or her own access. iTunes U displays the current user’s credential and Edit access as read-only in the Access pop-up menu
within the Course page.
Any ideas?

I haven't looked at the admin documentation but having Edit permissions on the album doesn't let you have the Edit Access option. What we do for instructors is create the course album for them and set Group Access Labels, as described, up for them for each other credential that has access (student credentials only in our case but I suppose you could do it for instructors, TAs, etc.). Folks with Edit level access to the album (Instructors in this case) can then Edit Page, edit the tabs and use the GALs to change permissions for other users to the tabs in the album.

Restrict read/edit access for a Manager, when Manager Visibility is enabled

Customer wants to restrict read/edit access for a Manager on his/her subordinates' owned record, if manager Visibility is enabled at the company level.
For example: If SM1 is a manager of SR1 and SM1 owner profile says that he has Edit Access on his owned records then, he will get Edit Access
on the records owned by his sales rep.
Current requirement here is Manager should not be able to edit the records of his sales rep but should able to only View. And manager also
need the Edit/Read access on the records which they owned.
Is there a possible workaround ?

I have devised this to our customer:
First, create a custom text field named "Reports To" on the object, say, Accounts.
Second, user JoinFieldValue to set a default value for the "Reports To" field: equal to the "Reports To" User field value for the current owner.
Third, add a new value named "Manager Read-Only" to 'Account Type' picklist. make sure that this picklist value is active.
Fourthly, add a new page layout marking all Account Fields as 'read-only' and name it "Account Read-Only layout".
Fifthly, create a new Account Dynamic Layout and set "Account Read-Only layout"
for Field Type = "Manager Read-Only".
Sixthly, create a new workflow rule condition for Account object ( before modified record saved ). Use the workflow rule condition similar to UserValue('<Alias>') = [<ReportsTo>] and set the workflow action to update 'Account Type' picklist value to
"Manager Read-Only".
This is just an example. Customer needs to improvise on this.
Any more suggestions please ?

Making the Business Area field as editable

Hi
We have business area field as compulsory field for document splitting. The same is picking up on the Business Area assignment in SD. However, the field for the same is seen as greyed out field in Sales Order at line item level. we would like to make the same field as editable. How can the same be done?
Regards
Rahul Sharma

Hi
The fields in a sales order can be made optional / mandatory by following this menu path - IMG - S&D-> Basic > Functions-> Log of incomplete Procedures => select the fields > from the tables and the system will check for them (OVA2/VUA2)
To make a filed entry enabled or grey (non-entry allowed):
User exits in the program MV45AFZZ-USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION
This user exit can be used to modify the attributes of the screen fields. To do this, the screen fields are allocated to so-called modification groups 1 - 4 and can be edited together during a modification in ABAP.
If a field has no field name, it cannot be allocated to a group. The usage of the field groups (modification group 1-4) is as follows:
Modification group 1: Automatic modification with transaction MFAW
Modification group 2: It contains LOO for step loop fields
Modification group 3: For modifications which depend on check tables or on other fixed information
Modification group 4: is not used
The FORM routine is called up for every field of a screen. If you require changes to be made, you must make them in this user exit. This FORM routine is called up by the module FELDAUSWAHL.
Actually suppressing fielding sales orders userwise is quite easy. We are doing it in our company. For this we use userexit FORM USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION in MV45AFZZ.
Below is the sample code
IF SCREEN-NAME = VBKD-ABSSC.
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT ZMV45AFZZ ID SCRFNAME FIELD SCREEN-NAME.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
SCREEN-INPUT = 1.
else.
SCREEN-INPUT = 0.
ENDIF.
endif.
You place the authority check object in authorization profile in the role of the users, who should have access to the field (in this case it is VBKD-ABSSC), and there assign the corresponding fields that are to be accessed via this userexit.

Field level trigger on qualifier field

Hello,
Here is my scenario.
I have a qualified field : ACTIVE FLAG in address qualified table.
What i want to do is if the value of this field changes to N (possible values of this field : Blank,Y and N),i want my workflow to trigger.
I know its possible with field trigger option where you create one time stamp field and will give the field you want to comare
but in case of qualified tables you can not select qualifier as a selected field for timestamp field.you can only select non qualifiers.
is there any other way this can be achieved?
thanks
Bindi

SharePoint doesn't provide field level permissions. Fellow MVP Dan Holme has a good article that recommends some approaches on this here:
http://sharepointpromag.com/blog/3-approaches-restricting-access-sharepoint-columns-and-metadata
Another approach you could take is to make the form an InfoPath form from in an InfoPath LIBRARY instead. This way you can control the form fields and prevent users from directly editing fields. It also plays really well with workflow.
I trust that answers your question...
Thanks
C
|
RSS |
http://crayveon.com/blog |
SharePoint Scripts | Twitter |
Google+ | LinkedIn |
Facebook | Quix Utilities for SharePoint
thanks for your reply , seems that creating two lists will work for me better. but can you provide some useful links that talks about how to create two lists and link them , and specify different permissions for each list using web-parts...

Sharepoint 2010 permission The following factors also affect the level of access for

hello,
In my development server ,suddently from no where all users ,even full control group users
cannot able to add or edit any list or any content.
The following factors also affect the level of access for user1(domain\user1)
Deny
Manage Permissions
Create and change permission levels on the Web site and assign permissions to users and groups.
Deny
Create Subsites
Create subsites such as team sites, Meeting Workspace sites, and Document Workspace sites.
Deny
Manage Web Site
Grants the ability to perform all administration tasks for the Web site as well as manage content.
Deny
Add and Customize Pages
Add, change, or delete HTML pages or Web Part Pages, and edit the Web site using a Microsoft SharePoint Foundation-compatible editor.
Deny
Manage Lists
Create and delete lists, add or remove columns in a list, and add or remove public views of a list.
Deny
Apply Themes and Borders
Apply a theme or borders to the entire Web site.
Deny
Apply Style Sheets
Apply a style sheet (.CSS file) to the Web site.
Deny
Override Check Out
Discard or check in a document which is checked out to another user.
Deny
Manage Personal Views
Create, change, and delete personal views of lists.
Deny
Add/Remove Personal Web Parts
Add or remove personal Web Parts on a Web Part Page.
Deny
Update Personal Web Parts
Update Web Parts to display personalized information.
Deny
Add Items
Add items to lists and add documents to document libraries.
Deny
Edit Items
Edit items in lists, edit documents in document libraries, and customize Web Part Pages in document libraries.
Deny
Delete Items
Delete items from a list and documents from a document library.
Deny
Create Groups
Create a group of users that can be used anywhere within the site collection.
Deny
Use Self-Service Site Creation
Create a Web site using Self-Service Site Creation.
Deny
Approve Items
Approve a minor version of a list item or document.
Deny
Delete Versions
Delete past versions of a list item or document.
Deny
Create Alerts
Create alerts.
Deny
Manage Alerts
Manage alerts for all users of the Web site.
Deny
Edit Personal User Information
Allows a user to change his or her own user information, such as adding a picture.
For all the users this happened ,How i need to fix this issue
please help.
thanks

Take a look at the user policy settings for the web application. I suspect someone has added a User Policy that covers the user which denies all these permissions. The User Policy at the web app level is the only place where you can deny permissions.
But that setting applies to every site collection in the web application and takes precedence over every other setting.
Paul Stork SharePoint Server MVP
Principal Architect: Blue Chip Consulting Group
Blog: http://dontpapanic.com/blog
Twitter: Follow @pstork
Please remember to mark your question as "answered" if this solves your problem.

In PO -Me21N Material PO text field non editable

Dear All ,
We have specific requirment in PO (ME21N). In Item level ther is free text field "Item Texts". In Item texts we have 4 text fields
(1) Item Text
(2) Info Record PO text
(3) Material Po text
(4) Deivery Text
As per our configuration in "Material PO text" Material long description picking from Material master .We want to make this text field Non Editable.
In SAP there is facility to configure non editable Texts , But it will non editable all text fields.
How we can non editable only Material Po text .
Thanks in Advance.
Regards
Abhishek Tiwari

Dear Chetan,
I think you have not understood my complete question. First thing i dont want to non editable Short text field.
In my problem i In Item level ther is free text field "Item Texts". In Item texts we have 4 text fields
(1) Item Text
(2) Info Record PO text
(3) Material Po text
(4) Deivery Text
In above text fields ,I want to non editable only "Material PO Text" only....
Regards
Abhishek Tiwari

Data conversion is necessary at field level

Hi everybody.
Im a BW consultant in a BCS project, and I had to make a change in a objetct that is used in BCS as a custom attribute.
What I made, is to remove the ALPHA routine in the object.
Later, the BCS consultant generetad the data basis again, and now when enter the UCWB a warning is showed, the message below:
But I dont know how to do the procedure showed in the message, does anyone face with the same problem? Any suggestion?
Best Regards,
Thiago
Field /BIC/ZC_EMPBPM: Data conversion is necessary
Message no. UGMD418
Diagnosis
Following a change to the definition of field /BIC/ZC_EMPBPM it is necessary to convert the old data for this field before the new attributes can be activated. This arises, for example, when the following attributes have been changed:
Conversion exit
Version or time dependency of hierarchies
System Response
You cannot start the application. A data conversion is necessary first.
Procedure
Execute the necessary data conversion at the field level. To do this, press the respective button with the symbol in the hierarchical detail display at the level of field /BIC/ZC_EMPBPM. If necessary, the system will prompt you for more information in a separate dialog box.
Regards!
Edited by: Thiago França Carvalho Silveira on Jun 10, 2010 11:13 PM

Hi,
I quess the following should help.
Execute UCWB01 t-code, goto your data basis, in the tabstrip for assigning roles drag and drop any characteristic, then save. The system will find the change and check and regenerate data structures (that's what you need).
Then either in UCWB or UCWB02 t-code got your ConsArea and regenerate it.

In Customised screen in IW53,fields are editable,how to make it output fild

Hello experts,
I am doing screen exit in IW51, i have 4 fields in this transaction. I can save the data through this transaction to database table, and i can see my data in IW52/IW53.
But the problem is that in transaction IW53 my fields are editable i.e they are input fields not output fields.I tried doing screen modifications by doing screen-input = '0' for that particular screen name but doesn't work.
Any advice please.
Thanks and Regards,
Swapnil

Dear Experts,
I Developed Screen-exit For IW51 t.codeTypically the custom fields are displayed in the notification on a separate tab, or at the bottom of the u201CGeneralu201D or u201CMainu201D tab. These are configuration decisions that could be made in the build phase.
Sets of custom fields need to be added based on the notification type. The following table provides a list and details of the custom fields required. The table to be extended is the VIQMEL table (to be verified by developer).
Also to extend header fields on the notification you need to include them in the include CI_QMEL where OPEX M&I has already fields in.
All fields should go on the notification header. There are no custom fields on the task or activity level.
All fields should be reviewed for consistency with the M&I design, specifically, Thomas Brothers, Atlas Sheet, district code. See Dale Alano.
Please any Body Helped Coding For this, Already i Created Customfields , I design Subscreen also using Enhancement QQMA0001. Using Exit name EXIT_SAPMIWO0_008 USIN SUBSCREEN 0104 PLEASE ANY BODY help me Coding for this IW52
Regards,
Santosh Ballyapelli

Customer Master - Restrict Acess at Field Level

Hi,
I have a requirement where in the customer master I need to restrict access to a field to 2 users. Only these 2 users should be able to edit this specific field. For all other users, this field should be read-only. This is for both VD01 and VD02. How can this be achieved?
Thanks in advance.
GA

Hi,
I think you can achieve this through authorization; means you can give only display access for the users whom you don't want to edit the customer master.
I am not very sure if you can restrict the edit access for other users only for two fields which you are talking about.
Hrishi

Masking at field level

Hello SDNers,
My concern is to allow view to several users by making MASKING AT FIELD LEVEL.
To make it clear:
Take one example of automobile giant in which certain views are needed :
a)Higher Managment View (Total Access to all the fields,say all 10 fields)
b)Sales View (which should be given access to say first 4 fields)
c)Finance VIew (which needs to have acess to some 7 fields)
As in the case mentioned i need Masking at Field level.
Share your views.
Solution will be rewarded.
Rgds,
Krutarth

Hi Krutharth,
Where do you want that view in data manager or you want to view your user specific records (Fileds) on Web UI. If you want to view the records on web UI you can arrange the user specific views in the Config UI by selecting the fields you want your specific user to view.
You can have field level masking i.e., you have to configure such masking on specific user in the config UI.
Data Manager you cannot impose such mask at field level.
Reward points if helpful.
Prasad.......................

Preventing Page Edit access

I'm looking for information that explains how portal access control works in Oracle Application Server 10g (9.0.4).
The situation I have at the moment is that I've created a page with one user QAManager and set its Access with the following settings:
* Display to public users is unchecked
* Enable Item Level security is unchecked
QAManager user has 'Manage' privilege
Authenticated Users group has 'View' privilege
I've clicked the 'clear cache' link at the bottom of the page as well.
No matter who I log on as (QAManager, Portal, Demo) I can still edit the page even though I thought that only QAManager would have edit access. This seems counter intuitive - is there some other cache I should be clearing, or have my users got some 'superuser' setting on them that overrides the page access control? What am I missing here? Any help appreciated.

Ok - with a bit of trial an error I've answered my own question. It appears Users in the Demo Portal Administrator's group have the ability to edit the content created by other users even when they haven't been granted access to edit that content (not sure what this has to do with administering portal but now that I know it I can live with it).

Field-level Edit Access

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for