Fielding issues HD on SD

Hi all
Does anyone know how I can edit HD onto a SD timeline without having serious interlacing/field domiance problems on my SD time?
My HD source is XDCAM as well as PRORES and looks shocking when played backed on a SD timeline when viewed on my HD monitor.
Problem here is most of the footage is SD and need to output to SD file, I have also tried playing with the field dominance settings on all clips/timelines to no success.
Thanks in advance
Peace

How to set up Compressor to output a center cut DV file from 1920x1080 HD...
Bring a file into Compressor. Type DV in the search box. The one we want is highlighted below:
Drag it to the Untitled window where your file is showing as a thumbnail. Click the setting next to the thumbnail to make the Inspector active and make sure they read as follows or adjust if needed:
Go to Target in the Menu bar then Destination to set where the output files are saved.
You can go to the File menu and save these settings as a Droplet.
Drag a bunch of files to a Droplet to apply the same settings in one go.

Similar Messages

  • Workaround for compressor HDV to DVD field issue?

    I need a work around for the field issue apparent when down-converting HDV to DVD.
    The Bonsai method <http://www3.telus.net/bonsai/Welcome.html> will not work, as there is too much motion and a side effect of the "fastest" conversion is that it gives a 3-d ghosting effect on fast motion in the frame.
    I can not convert to 720P60 or 480P, as FCP converts it to 30P and then doubles the frames, and the motion is jittery.
    I could dump it to camera and then down-convert in camera, but I have heard this is not a great method either.
    I have seen in another forum to save the HDV timeline in FCP as a HDV quicktime movie, and then import that into DVD studio pro and have it down-convert, but DVD studio pro says this is an "incompatible file".
    How do I get 1080i HDV footage onto a DVD so that it looks acceptable?

    I had a similar problem with HDV (1080i shot on Cannon HV-20) footage, looks great in post and terrible when converted (herringbone lines and too many artifacts.) I’ve successfully used the Bonsai method on another piece I did but the footage was shot on a HVX-200 at 720 24p and there were no “action” shots. I wasn’t as successful using the method using 1080i footage and it definitely didn’t help with the fast motion shots. I did a search in this forum on HD to SD and there are a lot of helpful hints and methods. I experimented with a lot of the suggestions but in the end I was able to produce very nice and acceptable results by doing the following:
    1] I didn’t create an SD sequence; I exported the footage as a Quicktime movie (self contained) straight from my HDV sequence.
    2] I dropped the Quicktime file into Compressor and selected 90-minute DVD Anamorphic Best 2-pass VBR. Running Compressor from Final Cut ties up your system as well as there seems to be a delay between the handoff from Final Cut to Compressor (running the latest 5.x version and 2.3.) Creating a Quicktime file frees your system and it’s debatable if you actually compress faster or take a hit on quality. I’ve tested both from Final Cut and using a Quicktime file and didn't see any real difference in quality.
    3] Change the field dominance from Top to Progressive in the tab where you see 2-Pass VBR Best and also in the encoding tab (not in front of my system so I can’t recall the name or order of the icons). In the encoding tab you will notice it says “same as source.” The pull down will show you Top, Bottom, Progressive, Automatic…I tried them all and in various combinations and anything other than progressive in both tabs produced undesirable results.
    4] The options for Fast, Good, Better and Best in the other encoding pull down sections are a matter of preference and patience. Selecting Best in all categories takes a really long time to compress (36 hours for a 9-minute piece using a Mac Pro 3.0GHz dual-core Intel with 4GB ram.) I ran tests using different combinations and found that selecting the default settings is decent and stepping each category up to the next level helped but not enough to warrant the long compression cycle to stick with Better across the board. When you do your testing, it’s best to use as little footage as possible or you will find yourself waiting too long to see the actual results. I used a 1-second (29 frames) shot of a girl twirling around, hair flying everywhere, and girls next to her using hula-hoop’s.
    5] Use the sliding bar in the viewer to see the impact of your choices before submitting the job. To the right you will see the “original” footage and to the left you can see the results of your selection. You can move the bar across the footage to see (approximately) the end results.
    6] One thing I did notice is that no matter what settings I use, the output is slightly darker (reds were deeper, skin tones were warmer and not as smooth), but hey, you are going from HDV to SD so it’s not going to be perfect.
    Hope that helps and good luck.
    Kenny

  • HDV to DVD field issue

    I need a work around for the field issue apparent when down-converting HDV to DVD.
    The Bonsai method will not work, as there is too much motion and a side effect of the "fastest" conversion is that it gives a 3-d ghosting effect on fast motion in the frame.
    I can not convert to 720P60 or 480P, as FCP converts it to 30P and then doubles the frames, and the motion is jittery.
    I could dump it to camera and then down-convert in camera, but I have heard this is not a great method either.
    I have seen in another forum to save the HDV timeline in FCP as a HDV quicktime movie, and then import that into DVD studio pro and have it down-convert, but DVD studio pro says this is an "incompatible file".
    How do I get 1080i HDV footage onto a DVD so that it looks acceptable?

    Just to make sure I undestand you (I am having the same problem...my video looks jagged and not very sharp).
    You're saying to creat a new sequence that is the 720 x 480 10 Bit Uncompressed?
    And then in Settings under field dominance set that to NONE and motion filtering quality to Best. When I put my sequence into this uncompressed timeline, do I need to render it or can I just go straight to compressor? Does it matter?
    Are there any settings within Compressor to change, such as Deinterlacing, field dominance (progressive, lower/even, upper/odd), blur, anti-aliasing?
    I am using HDV 1080i60 Codec to shoot in and edit.
    Thanks so much. I will try your suggestion. Have you used this procedure much?

  • PSD comp field issue with only some elements

    I have a comp created from a layered psd file, I have animated it and most elements are fine, except this one, have a look at the frame I exported. A field issue but why only with one of the elements? When it is un-rendered it draws fine, rendered though and I get this, this layer continues on for longer than the two minute limit as well, so I had to duplicate/copy the layer, the copied version is fine...
    Also it is intermittent.
    http://www.digital-image.com.au/videos/fcp/

    hi preethi ,
    just check this code .
    data : quant like ekpo-menge,       " ur data type
              v_quant(13) type c.                     " --->proposed
              quant = 0.                                 " made initial.
              v_quant = quant.
    write:/ quant.                         
    if quant is initial.
    write:/ 'hi'.                            "gets triggered cause some value is there
    endif.
    if v_quant is initial.
    write:/ 'hi'.                           "even though value is there dosent get triggered
    endif.
                           "cause its character.
    if u can make the screen field as character then u can have solution in my opinion .
    just check if this alternate can help ur code ..
    regards,
    vijay.

  • Sharepoint Foundation 2013 User field issue

    Guys, I have an issue with Sharepoint Foundation 2013 site that we have created some custom workflows for. We have a couple required fields that we type in a users name and it automatically pulls up a user based on Active directory. once we choose that name
    and then save the form. the field immediately becomes blank when i open the workflow item back up. I'm kind of at a loss. I've already totally hosed the server once and was forced to restore.  This seams to have started when we installed share point server
    patch KB2881077 but i cannot uninstall or roll back the patch as there is no option to.
    Thoughts?

    If you're using SharePoint 2013 April 2013 CU or higher, this is a known issue where the People data is missing in Edit view. There is a separate issue that is resolved in the September 2014 CU:
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2995905
    Consider the following scenario:
    You create a SharePoint 2013 list that contains a Person or Group (people picker) column.
    You create or edit an item, and then you select a person whose name contains a comma in the Person or Group field.
    In this scenario, the value of the Person or Group field is lost when you save the item. 
    Trevor Seward
    Follow or contact me at...
    &nbsp&nbsp
    This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

  • OIM 9.1.0.2 - Note field issues

    Hi Gurus,
    IHAC who has got a strange behavior in OIM for a custom connector ( there are a lot of resource using it).
    After request is concluded, if customer goes to User Detail --> Resource Profile and select the resource that was requested, he find out all the generated task (system validation, create user, etc) with the information (************) in Note field. That was not configured to be so. And as that field is used to received Target's response notes, when the target sends an error message with some information (we can see the notes in the logs), that information is not able to be inserted in Note field in the OIM. This behavior has only happened to some resources.
    Has anyone a tip?
    What could I check?
    TiA,

    Hi Gurus,
    Regarding to issue reported above, I have found the bug 7590135 (https://bug.oraclecorp.com/pls/bug/webbug_edit.edit_info_top?rptno=7590135 ).
    For that bug, as informed in the bug below, there was released a fix in the 9.1.0.2 BP 01.
    In that bug there is the following information:
    @ We need to add following property in 9101BP01 release document to fix this
    @ issue.
    @ <store>
    @ <Note>
    @ <SpecialField>true</SpecialField>
    @ </Note>
    @ </store>
    @ true : to show the decrypted value for password field
    @ false : to show blank value for password field
    By the code below is possible to verify the status of the attribute:
    tcProvisioningOperationsIntf taskOperations = (tcProvisioningOperationsIntf) this.getUtilityOperations("Thor.API.Operations.tcProvisioningOperationsIntf");
    Map<String, String> filtro = new HashMap<String, String>();
    //filtro.put("Objects.Name", "Sistema Atlys");
    //filtro.put("Objects.Name", "Sistema PP");
    statusFiltro[0] = "Pending";
    tcResultSet tarefas = taskOperations.findAllOpenProvisioningTasks(filtro, statusFiltro);
    for(int i=0; i<tarefas.getRowCount(); i++)
         tarefas.goToRow(i);
         long tKey = tarefas.getLongValue("Process Instance.Task Details.Key");
         System.out.println("isTaskNoteEncrypted: [" + this.taskOperations.isTaskNoteEncrypted(tKey) + "]");
    RESULTS:
    - "Sistema Atlys" resultado: "isTaskNoteEncrypted: [true]"
    - "Sistema PP" resultado: "isTaskNoteEncrypted: [false]"
    Can I consider that bug the same I have faced?
    And the problem now is, How can I configure the Note to be displaying not encrypted results? Is this a system property (OIM)??
    Regards,
    Edited by: user12295533 on 23/05/2011 13:21

  • Enhancement-ABAP Code-Customized Field issue

    Hi Experts,
    Currently I am working on the BW3.5 version. We are using the standard SRM standard extractor 0BBP_TD_SC_1 and we enhance same extractor(populate the filed through CMOD - ABAP Code) with one customized field also. We are having issue on the customized field data which post from SRM system. I have verified the field value and value is fine in RSA3 in SRM source system. But while posting into the BW(PSA itself), its loading correct & wrong value. When i check the PSA for the particular load, It looks little strange. In the PSA, I can see correct value on my first record of the same SC and then next records has incorrect value of the same SC. Currently I am using the ODS as a data target. So finally i am getting the incorrect value on the customized field.
    Ex Scenario:
    Ex Customized Field: ZORGID
    In SRM source system RSA3 Extractor Checker value:
    Shopping Card No: 100
    Customized Field: ZORGID=1
    Shopping Card No: 200
    Customized Field: ZORGID=2
    In BW posting-PSA:
    Shopping Card No: 100
    Customized Field: ZORGID=2
    Shopping Card No: 200
    Customized Field: ZORGID=2
    At the same time, if i do the selective deletion of the particular Shopping Card or group of SC in BW and do the full repair, then it gets a correct ZORGID=1 for the same Shopping Card.
    I strongly believe, something wrong in the ABAP code. But when we tried to debug the customized filed value in RSA3. The value is fine. so we unable to trace out the issue. Please help me to fix the code. Thanks in advance.
    CMOD ABAP Code:
    *Populate approver ID even though it doesn't require approval this is required to make sure BW reports have restrict access to respective Org Unit approvals only
    IF l_s_bbp_sc-approver_id IS INITIAL AND l_s_bbp_sc-itm_guid IS NOT INITIAL.
    CALL FUNCTION 'Z_BBP_FIRST_APPROVALGET'
    EXPORTING
    iv_header_guid = l_s_bbp_sc-guid
    iv_itm_guid = l_s_bbp_sc-itm_guid
    IMPORTING
    approver_no = l_s_bbp_sc-approver_id
    EXCEPTIONS
    no_data = 1
    OTHERS = 2
    IF sy-subrc 0.
    ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
    To ensure that the Org Unit passed in into the field
    l_s_bbp_sc-zzapprov_orgunit belongs to the Actual Level 1
    Budget Owner and not any other manager such as Added Approver.
    CLEAR : ls_ln_approvers, l_userid, lv_bpartner_guid.
    DATA : lv_f_apprv_part TYPE BU_PARTNER.
    READ TABLE lt_ln_approvers INTO ls_ln_approvers
    WITH KEY INITIAL_INDEX = '0000000001'.
    IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
    MOVE ls_ln_approvers-approval_agent+2(12) TO l_userid.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BP_CENTRALPERSON_GET'
    EXPORTING
    iv_username = l_userid
    IMPORTING
    ev_bu_partner_guid = lv_bpartner_guid
    EXCEPTIONS
    no_central_person = 1
    no_business_partner = 2
    no_id = 3
    OTHERS = 4.
    IF sy-subrc = 0.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BUPA_NUMBERS_GET'
    EXPORTING
    iv_partner_guid = lv_bpartner_guid
    IMPORTING
    ev_partner = lv_f_apprv_part.
    ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
    We get the BP number of the first Budget Owner 1
    Here, we superseed the field l_s_bbp_sc-approver_id
    whereby it may be wrong due to Added Approver.
    IF l_s_bbp_sc-approver_id IS NOT INITIAL.
    IF lv_f_apprv_part IS NOT INITIAL.
    IF l_s_bbp_sc-itm_guid IS NOT INITIAL.
    CALL FUNCTION 'RH_STRUC_GET'
    EXPORTING
    act_otype = 'BP'
    act_objid = lv_f_apprv_part
    act_wegid = 'EBP-UP'
    act_begda = sy-datum
    act_endda = sy-datum
    act_tdepth = 4
    TABLES
    result_tab = lt_result_tab
    EXCEPTIONS
    no_plvar_found = 1
    no_entry_found = 2
    OTHERS = 3
    IF sy-subrc = 0.
    READ TABLE lt_result_tab INTO ls_result_tab WITH KEY
    otype = 'O'.
    IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
    l_s_bbp_sc-zzapprov_orgunit = ls_result_tab-objid.
    ELSE.
    ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
    Thanks,
    RR

    Hi Experts,
    Any suggestions. Thanks.
    Thanks,
    RR

  • Dates fields issue in the sales orders through IDOC

    Hi all,
    I'm trying to create a sales order through Inbound IDOC using IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS.
    I have 2 custom fields in the sales order which are date fields.
    I'm populating them from the IDOC segments(using E1EDKT1-tdid, E1EDKT2-tdline) in the user-exit just before the call trasacation statement. These dates are not coming for a few orders... but are getting populated normally for few of them.
    But the tricky part is that... if I process the same IDOC for the second time.. the order created is having the dates.
    My issue is that.. i need all the orders to be populated with the dates which IDOC have.
    Could anyone please help me with this issue.
    All the answers/replies are highly appreciated!!
    Thanks for you help!

    hi,
    the following may be of help
    There are 2 major exceptions to the batch input internal table. All text data from the segments E1EDKT1/2 and E1EDPT1/2 are not part of the batch input session. Text elements from these segments are posted directly to the data base AFTER the sales order has been created (please note: in order that item texts are posted correctly to the sales order the field POSEX from segment E1EDP01 MUST be transmitted). Also, configurable material information from the IDOC is exported to a global memory and therefore will not be part of the batch input session. Configurable material data is performed in Form CHECK_CONFIGURATION and the data is exported to global memory in the following code:
    Exportiert IDOC Daten ins globale Memory     
    export IDOC data to global memory            
      call function 'CUXC_IDOC_TO_MEMORY'          
           tables                                  
                cfg_instref = xe1curef             
                cfg_ref     = xe1cucfg             
                inst        = xe1cuins             
                part_of     = xe1cuprt             
                value       = xe1cuval             
           exceptions                              
                error       = 1                    
                others      = 2.                   
    One extra piece of useful infomartion if you wish to debug the process is to set your breakpoints at the following points
    for Function module IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS
    include LVEDAF0F..
      CALL TRANSACTION 'VA01' USING bdcdata
                                MODE  input_method
                                UPDATE 'S'
                                MESSAGES INTO xbdcmsgcoll.
    Now input_method is A foreground process and N for background processing but try changing it to P (pass through mode)
    If you have breakpoints in va01, e.g. MV45AF0B_BELEG_SICHERN,(the part where the sales document is saved)
    they will be hit, e.g
    perform userexit_save_document_prepare.
    perform userexit_save_document.
    Lastly, don't forget using program SDJEDI , see note 380603 for more information on this
    Hope this is useful
    Paul Quinn

  • How do I create a certificate to remove signature field issues?

    I would like to start using digital signatures for some internal documents. We are a small site with about 20 PC users (3 of them Apple).
    We can create PDFs with signature fields but every time we sign the document, when somebody needs to sign again (for approval of the first sign), then a constant message "file has been modified since it was signed" and also "at least one signature has problems......"
    The way I created the forms is by adding form fields and then "Extend features in Adobe Reader" as only the 3 Apple devices have Professional version of Acrobat.
    What is the correct way to do this? I think I need to create a Trusted certificate, of course for the size of our site I don't want to have external solutions, especially because it is for internal purposes only.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks.

    How the signing certificates that you use for all signatures were procured? Were they created by a reputable Certificate Authority (CA) or are they self-signed certificates that you can create in Acrobat and other apps?
    If they are self-signed certificates then you need to explicitly trust each of them on each Acrobat/Reader installation. You can use (Acrobat XI/Reader XI) to do that:
    1. Right-click on the signature, select "Show Signature Properties...->Show Signer's certificate".
    2. In the left pane shows the signer's certificate. Select it.
    3. Select "Trust" tab on top and in this tab "Add to Trusted Certificates". Again for self-signed certificates you need to do that on each Acrobat/Reader installation.
    If you got your signing certificates from a Certificate Authority #2 above shows the certificate chain. Select that top-most certificate in the chain and add trust for it as in #3. Chances are that all your certificates were issued by the same CA. In this case you need to add trust to only this one certificate on each Acrobat/Reader installation.
    You can use Export/Import Security Settings feature in Acrobat to make this process easier. This feature was discussed at length in several discussions on this forum <Re: Small Business Digital Signature Set-up>. Search for "Export/Import Security Settings" for more info.

  • Alternative Account number - using as a custom field/Issues in reports pull

    Hi All,
    Requirement:
    Create a new field in the GL master that will link through to a new 8 to 10 character new Chart of Accounts (COA).
    We are presently using the "Group Account number" field from the GL master for reporting purposes through a Group COA. So this won't be available for our new purpose. Instead of creating a custom field and pulling the data, I'm thinking to use Country Chart of Accounts to fill this gap by using "Alternative Account Number" in GL Control data tab.
    I created a new Country COA and assigned it to Operational COA. Created new GL account (FS00) and also created a new Country Chart of Accounts (FSP0) at Chart of Accounts level and assigned this to the created GL (FS00). In this process I got couple of issues
    1) System didn't allow me to assign Country COA GL if already has the balance, and tried to change this error message in OBA5 without success. How can I add newly crated Alternative a/cs to the existing (balanced) GL A/cs?
    2) This time I created brand new GL a/c and added the alternative a/c and created new Financial Statement Version (FSV) assigned the newly crated a/cs but I couldn't run the reports on this new COA, getting following error message "Company codes and charts of accounts entered are incompatible" when executing F.01/F.08.
    3) May be silly to ask - why we are not maintaining the Alternative a/c at Company Code level (FSS0)? Why we are only maintaining at Chart of Accounts level (FSP0)?
    Would be glad if any one touch this area deep enough to understand easily

    Hi
    The system will update the amount at company code level GL only. You can post the entries at company code gl only, no option to post the transaction figures at chart of accounts level. So the group COA or country level COA will pick up the transactional data from the GL at country level. Remaining level GLs are link with the country level COA.

  • Add instance on Read only field issue

    I have a subform with two fields , one a date field to capture current system date and time and another is a Text field for some comments.
    Then there are two buttons ,one for Adding the instance for these two fields and another is a Save button which makes these two fields
    The requirement is that once both the fields are filled with data and i click on save button, the fields should become read only ,however when i click on the add instance button the instance is added successfully but the save button click is not making the new instance read only.
    The Code for Add Instance Button is :
    "New1.FileNote.instanceManager.addInstance(true);
    xfa.form.recalculate(true);"
    The code for Save button to make the fields read only is :
    New1.FileNote.DateTimeField101.access = "readOnly";
    New1.FileNote.TextField37.access = "readOnly";
    Please guide me as I am totally blank on how to code the same..Have a rough logic of using a for loop with index of the Add Instance but not getting the way out for the code.
    Thanks a lot for any help and guidance.

    Hi Steve,
    Thanks for your reply..I made it happen using the for loop with Index and resolve node. However there is another issue which occured after that..I have a date/time field in that repeating subform instance.
    The run time property is set to Current Date/Time. Now the issue is whenever i click on save, form.recalculate instance changes the existing time value in the previous subbform instance as well
    Is there a way to retain the existing value in the field of the previous instance ??
    Regards
    Kapil

  • LiveCycle Designer 8.0 - Image Field Issue

    I am using LiveCycle Designer 8. Ive inserted an image field and when I test it, the image doesnt scale proportionally even though the properties are set up correctly (Scale image proportionally). I understand that in order to get this to work, the files needs to be saved as a dynamic PDF, but I don't have an option of saving as a dynamic PDF. The only "Save as" type options I have are Adobe 7 (Static) PDF Form and Adobe 8 (Static) PDF Form. I also don't have an option of saving as a "dynamic" PDF in the Acrobat Save As window.
    Is there a way to work around this or am I doing something wrong. The file was designed in InDesign, exported to a PDF and then brought into LiveCycle to insert text fields and an image field for a user to input their contact info and their logo. The 5 text fields work perfectly and the one image field works EXCEPT for scaling proportionally even though the properties for that field are set correctly.
    I appreciate any assistance. Thanks!

    Did you import the file using "Create an Interactive Form with Fixed Pages" as your selection on the Import dialog? If so, this brings in the original InDesign PDF as "artwork" (a background layer) on which your form fields are placed. This document can't be dynamic. That might be the issue.

  • Text field issue in Sub Form

    Hello Experts,
    I am creating my very first Adobe Form for my client. I have created a subform with "Flowed" content. I have one Text Field in that sub form. When I try to place the second Text Field adjacent to that, it's not letting me do that. It's placing the Text Field under the first one. Can you please let me know how to overcome this issue?
    Thanks a lot for your help. I did search and could not find any solution for this.
    Also, I tried to change the position manually, but the X: and Y: positions are greyed out for me in Layout pallette.
    Edited by: sam jose on Apr 28, 2011 6:04 PM

    Hi sam,
    When you have selected the sunform to be "flowed" , there is an adjacent field where you mention the typr of flow - 'Top to bottom ' or 'Western text' . If you specify as 'western text' then you could get the desired result. you can use rectangles etc for any alignment based on your layout requirement.
    Soha.

  • Profit center field issue

    Dear expert
               while posting tds line item profit center is appearing  inside" MORE".but our endures wants its in main screen  .please help me to solve this issue
    Regards
       Ajeesh.s

    Hi Expert,
    Go to T-Code: FS00, and Select the TDS GL Account and Go to Change option and Select the Create/Bank/Interest Tab,
    Select the Field Status Group(Double Click on it) which transfer to the Field Status Group - Double click on Additional account assignments, there see profit center field might be in suppress mode, Select the Optional radio button with respect to Profit Center Field.(Here it is only in display mode). So to T-Code: OBC4 to do the changes....
    Go to T-Code: OBC4, then select your Field Status Variant and Select your Field Status Group and do the changes now..
    Try to post the document now, which will display in the screen..
    Regards,
    GK
    SAP

  • Sharepoint Site User name,created by and Modified field issue

    I am being admin of sharepoint site . I have added a user to my sharepoint site from people and groups(Site Action-->Site Settings-->Users and Permissions-->People and Groups). So Now "Created by" and "Modified by" field should
    show My login name(display name) in those fields Right ? But In those field it is showing  user name whom I have added to my sharepoint site. I have added user to my site so My display name should be their  in "created by" and "modified
    by" field. Facing this issue on PROD and UAT.

    Hi Rajshekhar,
    Actually, the users have been added to the site groups or granted with permissions in Site Permissions, then the users will be added to the User Information List of the site collection.
    I recommend to check if the users you added have already been listed in the User Information List.
    If yes, then the Created By and Modified By fields have already been filled with other values.
    Created By field will show the user name who is the first one to add the user to the site and the Modified By field will show the last one who edit the My Settings of that user.
    To access the User Information List, you can type the URL like this:
    http://server/_catalogs/users/detail.aspx.
    Best regards,
    Victoria
    TechNet Community Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
    [email protected]

  • Add/Edit Fields Issue

    I am trying to add a field to a document (I do this frequently, so I am familiar with the process), unfortunately I am not able to place the field where I need to in the document.  I am being restricted where I can place a field.  Is there a way to rectify this?  I have tried mutliple documents to test if it was a corrupt document issue - does not appear to be. 

    It may be that you accidentally turned on the snap to grid feature.

Maybe you are looking for