FIFO Valuation with Material Ledger !

Hi, 
How do we accomplish FIFO Valuation using Material Ledger ?
We have activated the Material Ledger, with Single - Level Determination; Standard Price S.  On execution of Single-Level Price Determination, we get the Periodic Unit Price -- which is the Weighted Average Price for the Receipts for the period involved.
I came across SAP Forums, which claim that Material Ledger is the FIFO Valuation on real-time basis. However, this doesn't seem to be true. The Goods Issued are assigned the Periodic Unit Price (calculated above -- i.e the Weighted Average Price ).
In addition, we have Configured the FIFO Balance Sheet Valuation Procedure, through the MM menu. The FIFO Value for the Material is giving weird results. Adding the total Inventory for all the Receipts till date and over-riding the period selection for Single Receipts.  For monthly receipts, the system just gives the Weighted Average Price again.
The Business is expecting the FIFO valution for the Inventory Balance on Monthly Basis. ( We are using Material Ledger, so that we can roll-up this FIFO Valuation  of the Raw Material ito Gross up into the Finished Product
-- Thanks

Hi Kenny ,
BASIC STEPS THAT CAN BE FOLLOWED FOR  ENDING INVENTORY VALUATION :
Ending Inventory is valued  as per FIFO calculated through following steps:
     Run the price calculation (Txn: KSII) u2013 check that all      auxiliary Cost centers are zero
     Run Txn:MRF3 (summarization of documents for the      FIFO calculation.)
     Run MRF1 (calculation of FIFO)
     Check if the FIFO calc. is correct via MR35
After ML run the ending inventory value should be equal to the value in MR35 and so balance amount not yet loaded to ending inventory through FIFO valuation is posted to consumption
Exception: If total receipts for a period is less than ending inventory quantity .In this case the EI is valued at weighted average
Please check wether the steps have been properly followed and the execption doesnot exists..
Also, hope your Price Determination is "3" and price control is "S" in Material Master..
Regards
Sarada

Similar Messages

  • Valuation area not yet productive with material ledger

    While doing goods receipt at MB1C,i got the below error:
    The description of the error is given below
    Valuation area XXX2 not yet productive with material ledger
    Message no. C+020
    Diagnosis
    The material ledger has been activated for the valuation area but material data has not yet been converted in this valuation area.
    Procedure for System Administration
    If you want to work with the material ledger, choose Accounting -> Controlling -> Actual Costing/Material Ledger -> Utilities -> Production Startup.
    There you can convert the data for the material ledger by following the instructions in the online documentation.
    Note
    Setting the material ledger to productive cannot be undone.
    See also:
    Actual Costing/Material Ledger in the SAP Library.
    The implementation guide for Actual Costing/Material Ledger.
    Can you kindly suggest me how to fix this error.
    Regards
    Sabera

    Hi Sabera,
    The Valuation Area is not activated for your material ledger. Go to SAP Access>>Accounting>>Controlling>>product cost controlling>>Actual Costing>>environment>>Production Start up>>Set Valuation area as productive.
    If you already activated Valution area in to Productive Statge.
    Then go to T.Code OMX1 and for your valuation area XXX2 tick the ML activation box.
    the error wont come
    regards
    srikanth

  • Error Message :Valuation area 1000 not yet productive with material ledger

    Dear Floks,
    I need some clarification to get rid of this error message and move further.
    While saving the PGI I am facing the follwoing error message: "Valuation area 1000 not yet productive with material ledger----
    The material ledger has been activated for the valuation area but
    material data has not yet been converted in theis valuation area."
    Plese respond with the solutions ASAP.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    ANGKS

    Hello Padmaja,
    You will to check the following before activation the Val.area
    1) OMX1: Check if ML is active against the plant IF NOT
    2) Use tcode CKMSTART - Enter Val area - EXECUTE.
    Regards,
    Manoj Reddy

  • Valuation area HDQF not yet productive with material ledger

    Dear all,
    When i PGI, there is an error: Valuation area HDQF not yet productive with material ledger.
    Pls help me to resolved.
    Thanks & Regards,

    Hi Quang,
    Please run CKMSTART tcode and give that plant no(HDQF). Execute the process and then click on Confirm button in the dialog box.
    Hope this helps.
    Rgds,
    Antima

  • Revaluating COPA COGS with Material Ledger values (KE27-B0 curr type)

    While attempting to use transaction KE27 to revaluate COPA with material ledger's cost component structure, we are getting an error for the B0 (Operating Concern Currency) records.  The error (KE 435) states that "Costing Key ML1 does not exist".  I have defined this costing key and it appears to be working for the Company Code (curr type 10) currency records.  Does anyone have any idea why I am unable to restate the Operating Concern Currency records?

    Hi Thomas,
    The system posts the difference between the original values of the line
    item and the new values in a new, separate line item, but in the same
    value fields. To avoid the error message KE435 you have to define for
    the costing key a value field for actual costs for your operating
    concern in customizing :
    Profitability Analysis  -> Master Data  -> Valuation  ->
    Set Up Valuation Using Material Cost Estimate  ->
    Define Access to Actual Costing/Material Ledger ->
    Costing Key for actual Cost Estimate  ->
    Val.Fld Allocatn for Periodic Moving Average Price (total cost)
    That is necessary even though you defined already value fields in
    Cost component structure (cost component split) in customizing :
    Profitability Analysis  -> Master Data  -> Valuation   ->
    Assign Value Fields (transaction KE4R)
    The program expects both entries, one for cost component total cost
    and several for cost component split. If there is a cost component
    split defined for material the valuation will distribute the share of
    costs to the value fields according the definition.
    Only for material without a cost component split the program will
    assign the costs to the value field for total costs.
    Regards,
    Abhisek

  • Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product

    Hi Experts,
    Message no. KE350, Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product "2286940000". Please suggest me to resolve this issue.
    Points will be provided for good solution.
    Regards,
    Jay

    Hi Jaya
    This means that your customization is wrong then...
    In KE4J or KEPC you have assigned costing keys to your material types or some other combination... You should have done this config in a way that costing key is not called  for in the case of non valuated materials...
    In Ke40 you have defined costing key where in you have specified "Issue error msg if no cost estimate found".. This costing key is assigned in KE4J or KEPC in a way that it is getting called even in case of non valuated materials...
    Do you have a separate mat type for non valuated material? If yes, remove this mat type from KE4J/KEPC..
    If you dont have separate mat type i.e. in the same mat type if you have both valuated and non valuated, then you have a problem.. You would get stuck in that case
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product "117122"

    Hi people,
    We have the error:
    =====================
    Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product "117122"
    Diagnosis
    In Profitability Analysis (CO-PA), the system tried to valuate a line item using the current standard cost estimate.
    In order to determine the current plan period, the system needs to read the valuation segment of the material master.
    The system has found that the current plan period is not filled forproduct "117122" in plant "UBE1".
    We have the follow configuration in trans.: KE40:
    . Determine material cost estimate
       . Transf. Standard Cost Estimate
    . Costing Variant
    . Control Data for Standard Cost Estimate
       . Period Indicator = "Current Standard Cost Estimate acc. to entry in mat master
    . Addiitonal data CO-PC
        . Transfer cost estimate in controlling area currency  "activated"
    We think the reason about our error is because the field above is activated and some configuration more is necessary for this case. For examplo: Trans.: OKYW and this one was not configurated yet.
    Do you know what happend?
    If we need to configure some transation, or sonly process the cost estimate?
    Thanks,
    Rosana.

    Hello Guido
    Thank you very much for your return.
    It is happenning in a Client that some people are doing the configuration.
    Before we didin't have in KE40, the fiel "Transfer cost estimate in controlling area currency" activated.
    And now, the people activate that in this new Client and I don't know the impact about that.
    I think we have to make the configuration in OKYW.
    The other transation you told me, we don't have any information.
    Could you tell me some other idea what happend?
    Message error is just "Message no. KE350"
    Abou claculate the cost:
    It was calculated by trans.: CK11N for future planning and the real wasn't not possible to release because this material already have moviments.
    Could you tell us is there is some thing more to do?
    Thanks,
    Rosana.

  • Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product " 200038 "

    Hi,
    I am getting an error:
    Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product " 200038 "  (Message KE350).
    Kindly assist on the same?

    If this material is mto material go to t.code KE40 and maintain define access to standard cost estimate define cost key with
    "Transfer sales orde cost estimatex".
    If it is mts material define costing key with Transfer std cost estimate  and in costing data
    costing variant : ppc1
    costing verstion: 1
    period  indicator:  Release std cost estimate matching with goods issue or material costing matching posting date.
    This will resolve ur problem.

  • Valuation with Material cost estimate

    Hi,
       I am getting an error: "Valuation with material cost estimate:error with product 003443434(material number)
    Does anyone know which transaction is used to correct this error?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Go to MM02. Select the views of the materials i.e. accounting 1 & 2 , costing 1 & 2 . Look at the valuation class u have maintained for the same material in the view Accounting 1.
    Hope u will get ur problem solved..Assign points, if helpful.
    Satya

  • FIFO valuation at material level

    Hi masters of SAP!
    I have a question about FIFO valuation I know the answer for because I have been reading SAP help on this subject but I am reluctant to beleive that cannot be done any other way.... For FIFO valuation if you read the documentation on it will work the following way:
    Period 1 -> 10 unist at 10 £/unit
    Period 2 -> 10 units at 5 £/unit
    Period 3 -> 5 units at 3 £/unit
    If at the end of period 3 we have 7 units left and we want to calculate FIFO value on this stock SAP will do the following:
    5x3 + 2x5 = £25 (this is correct)
    25/7= £3.571/unit , the system will go and populate all 7 materials with this average price (this is wrong in my opinion, since the system should value differently the 5 units from period 3 and the 2 from period 2)... This is not FIFO, is it?.
    Has anyone known any other way so that the material price in the extra fields of the material master gets updated accordingly to the price they were adwuired at?
    Please, surprise me!!
    Thanks
    Mario

    I never worked on 45b, but with 46c and Ecc6 it is possible to restrict based on materail type by using authorization object M_MATE_MAR

  • 3 valuations in Material ledger

    Hi,
    My client's requirement is as follows:
    1) Legal valuation has to be in Local currency but on Actual Costing
    2) Profit Center Valuation in Local currency but on standard costing - same as Group valuation
    3) Group Valuation in Group currency in standard costing - Group valuation
    Is this possible when, Actual costing Material ledger implemented?
    I imagin, Legal valuation field in Material Master will be updated by periodic unit price when we run CKMLCP.  Then Profit center valuation field in the Material Master will be updated when we run CK40N in standard costing PC valuation costing run.  Then again we will run ck40n in standard costing for Group valuation to update Group valuation in Material Master.
    If my client opts to run ck40n for legal valuation, then he should also be able to mark and release standard cost new price, in Legal valuation field of material master and actual costing will not release standard price for new period.
    The requirement is typically complicated, as my client wants to maintain his Global template, though one country comes under actual costing requirement.
    I would like to dig out answers from real time experience please.
    Cheers,
    Ashok

    I can give you some information but not everything.  I have gone through the deployment of material ledger using 3 valuations, but not the ones you are using.  We used Local, Group and Group at Group.  All 3 are at actual costing.  What this means is that the local currency is the currency in the country where the plant exists.  The group valuation is a straight conversion to US dollars from the local currency based on the currency conversion tables M and P rates.  Note that both of these first two currencies can include intercompany profit if reflected on the transferring sales order between companies.  The Group at Group is the US dollar conversion without the intercompany profit.  We find this works for our business.
    The other thing about material ledger is that you need to have a standard cost estimate so that material ledger can keep track of the cos component structure.  The way it works is as follows:
    Say the standard estimate shows labor=$100, materials=$200 and overhead=$300 for a total cost of $600.  All transactions in the month using this material use the $600 standard.  Now, when material ledger is run at month end, the PUP (periodc unit price) is calculated and let us assume the PUP values are labor=$150, materials=$250, overhead=$350 for a total PUP of $750.  Material ledger already has tables with the details of the standard components against every transaction.  Now it will apply the remaining adjustments totalling $150 to the proper cost components for COPA purposes.  This is pushed to COPA using transaction KE27.  Think of it like this...Actual cost is equal to standard ($600) plus/minus variances ($150). 
    Therefore, you always should have a standard cost estimate when using material ledger.  At least that is my usage and understanding.  I hope I provided useful information for you in some way.
    David

  • GR/IR account problem with material ledger

    Hi,
    I just found an issue as effect of material ledger implementation.
    after the material ledger is active, when we post a transaction in foreign currency (invoice receipt), the LC 2 amount of GR/IR account is somehow different from the document amount, and the difference is transferred into Material price difference account that we maintain in OBYC - PRD transaction.
    because of this, the LC2 amount of  GR/IR account can't be cleared.
    any suggestion, please?
    thanks,
    Nasikhin

    hi,
    It will affect your valuation for the document, which are still open..
    You shd run this only after closing all documents and completing whole MM cycle..
    Once this is run, you can't go back and make settlements...
    So, beware...
    Regards
    Priyanka.P

  • FIFO valuation with stock transfer

    Hello
    I would like to include stock transfer movements between 2 plants within the same company code in my FIFO valuation. The price to be used in the receiving plant shall be the std price from the delivering plant. Unfortunately I don't have success with the marking of movement types in MRF3... Can any of you help me?
    Best regards
    Søren Kirch
    LOGSTOR
    Edited by: Søren Kirch Jensen on Dec 22, 2008 3:38 PM

    xxx

  • Error: Valuation area PLANT1 not yet productive with material ledger

    Hi Sap Consultants,
    I am getting the above error when I am trying to create materail.
    Thanks,
    Padmaja

    Hello Padmaja,
    You will to check the following before activation the Val.area
    1) OMX1: Check if ML is active against the plant IF NOT
    2) Use tcode CKMSTART - Enter Val area - EXECUTE.
    Regards,
    Manoj Reddy

  • Material Ledger Valuation

    Is it possible to have 2 or more standard prices for a single material e.g. one price for imported material and one for in-house produced material. If it is possible then what will be the effect of this when material ledger is activated?

    Hi,
    Yes we can use more than one standard price for a single material by using split valuation.
    You can use split valuation with Material Ledger:
    Assume that two valuation types are required.
    Valuation Type-1 for imported material
    Valuation Type-2 for in-house produced material
    Material master price control =S for Valuation Type-1,
    Material master price control =S for Valuation Type-2,
    Material master price control =V without valuation type (header level).
    Price determination indicator = 3 for header as well as each valuation type.
    Good receipts and Goods Issue will happen for each valuation type.
    At month end after Actual Costing Run. the material valuation will happen:
    Header level (weighted MAV of both the valuation types)
    For Val type-1(weighted MAV of this valuation type only)
    For Val type-2(weighted MAV of this valuation type only)
    Price variances of valuation type will be carry forward to next level, if this product is consumed at next level.
    You can find the Actual costs at each valuation type level in MM03 or CKM3 or CKM3N.
    Hope the above example provides some inputs to you.
    Please check and confirm.
    Thanks and Regards
    Binoj M D

Maybe you are looking for

  • Can I use Final Cut Studio 2 software on a MacBook Air?

    My old MacBook Pro was stolen a couple of years ago and I replaced it with a MacBook Air OSX 10.9.5. I still have the software from Final Cut Studio 2  which I used on my MacBook Pro. I haven't got around the replacing this and was looking at the Fin

  • Two Apple IDs: Need to get rid of one

    I ended up with two Apple IDs because of a typo I didn't notice for a few weeks. The ID I have been using has an error in it (email address is missing a letter) In my haste to fix things, I ended up creating a 2nd account/ID, and while the "email" is

  • Current source files lost in OS upgrade

    Can this happen? I have recently upgraded to OSX 10.6.8 and  now find that when I open iWeb app it is showing source files from a year ago.  The version is iWeb 3.04.  Cannot remember if that was the version before upgrade. All very confusing. Any he

  • I want to run my office website in firefox but the error is saying active x and java not installed

    i want to run my office website in firefox but the error is saying active x and java jvm not installed in firefox after installing java and jre the website is opening but in the righ side tree is there that it is not opening

  • Black line on the left margin when printing

    The printing functionality for a coloring book app working great in AS2. After porting to AS3 users get a black border on the left side of the page. Have anyone had this problem or know of any solutions? Thanks in advance for your time.