File size differences between JE 3.3.87 and

Our application when using JE 4.1.17 builds a database that is 3.5 times larger than when using JE 3.3.87.
Is this expected? Is there anything we can do with 4.1.17 to build smaller file size DB?
Chuck Koscher

I also ran DbPrintLog on the partial 4.1.17 built Db (gona take more time to run on the ver 3 DB). What does this all mean?
[qs@cr3 bin]$ more DbPrintLog.out
<DbPrintLog>
Log statistics:
type total provisional total min max avg entries
count count bytes bytes bytes bytes as % of log
LN 1,641,390 0 635,530,086 37 38,103 387 35.8
MapLN 39,660 0 129,537,451 50 5,377 3,266 7.3
NameLN 5 0 426 35 111 85 0
DupCountLN 31,568 84 891,783 22 32 28 0.1
FileSummaryLN 2,978,385 0 203,225,292 28 38,130 68 11.5
IN 176,586 16,952 281,957,554 44 9,735 1,596 15.9
BIN 216,441 64,082 356,220,165 44 10,188 1,645 20.1
DIN 40,046 2,111 22,350,697 85 5,425 558 1.3
DBIN 42,555 2,907 143,815,258 71 10,146 3,379 8.1
Root 168 0 452,371 123 3,719 2,692 0
CkptStart 68 0 2,101 29 31 30 0
CkptEnd 66 0 4,179 57 64 63 0
BINDelta 175 0 17,715 35 1,507 101 0
DupBINDelta 22 0 3,996 51 1,361 181 0
Trace 450 0 69,440 46 305 154 0
FileHeader 178 0 6,764 38 38 38 0
key/data 578,081,436 (32.6)
Total bytes in portion of log read: 1,774,085,278
Total number of entries: 5,167,763
Per checkpoint interval info:
lnTxn ln mapLNTxn mapLN end-end end-start start-end maxLNReplay ckpt
End
0 6 0 3 10,016,254 10,002,932 13,322 6 0x2/0x3f7
e
0 21,291 0 209 20,537,114 20,353,908 183,206 21,294 0x10/0x87
198
0 10,557 0 141 10,187,476 10,044,801 142,675 10,723 0x14/0xb4
dec
0 41,526 0 900 46,753,313 46,610,643 142,670 41,612 0x203/0x7
25a0d
0 35,418 0 711 41,367,099 41,354,438 12,661 35,538 0x314/0x8
73648
0 7,992 0 187 9,537,017 9,521,859 15,158 7,992 0x349/0x8
025c1
0 10,424 0 185 10,332,196 10,238,081 94,115 10,426 0x34f/0x8
53765
0 10,467 0 216 10,123,100 10,110,090 13,010 10,562 0x353/0x8
71841
0 8,814 0 190 10,170,639 10,012,047 158,592 8,816 0x355/0x8
9b2d0
0 20,157 0 585 24,985,565 24,896,315 89,250 20,233 0x3d2/0x3
d2f2d
0 8,614 0 197 10,266,414 10,227,891 38,523 8,681 0x3da/0x4
13fdb
0 29,407 0 709 34,661,770 34,645,633 16,137 29,408 0x45a/0x8
861e5
0 8,512 0 203 10,694,331 10,622,804 71,527 8,513 0x46a/0x9
2fa20
0 17,131 0 349 20,149,317 20,118,102 31,215 17,153 0x470/0x9
54165
0 50,120 0 1,106 56,983,602 56,958,921 24,681 50,120 0x533/0x6
73a97
0 16,608 0 418 20,484,484 20,467,444 17,040 16,619 0x53f/0x6
e9f1b
0 16,920 0 395 20,846,145 20,819,500 26,645 16,920 0x557/0x7
b885c
0 9,033 0 219 10,860,030 10,834,496 25,534 9,037 0x56f/0x8
8a7da
0 68,165 0 1,762 90,245,785 90,214,129 31,656 68,168 0x68e/0x8
c67f3
0 9,140 0 200 9,904,174 9,827,759 76,415 69,294 0x800/0x8
af1a1
0 9,032 0 215 10,299,639 10,201,642 97,997 9,095 0x80a/0x8
f8418
0 66,535 0 1,462 75,431,349 75,410,311 21,038 66,600 0x880/0x4
9cdcd
0 8,504 0 222 10,680,253 10,659,337 20,916 8,507 0x896/0x5
42f0a
0 17,543 0 632 20,080,030 20,050,546 29,484 17,546 0x89a/0x5
567a8
0 25,548 0 617 32,433,830 32,368,958 64,872 25,564 0x8d6/0x7
a8ace
0 9,710 0 238 10,564,761 10,547,253 17,508 9,728 0x8ee/0x8
328e7
0 21,166 0 884 26,557,127 26,363,082 194,045 21,167 0x93f/0x4
ea02e
0 133,812 0 2,755 133,366,171 133,318,671 47,500 133,887 0xb95/0x8
1fd49
0 39,793 0 844 41,359,213 41,308,651 50,562 134,394 0xbbf/0x9
6bab6
0 56,793 0 1,231 52,693,165 52,642,716 50,449 56,796 0xc0a/0x2
73c63
0 26,444 0 418 23,694,267 23,628,234 66,033 26,503 0xc1a/0x5
f9b1e
0 23,730 0 459 22,482,062 22,376,959 105,103 23,790 0xc52/0x8
57aac
0 10,907 0 264 10,299,749 10,258,468 41,281 10,980 0xc5c/0x8
a0d91
0 102,960 0 2,034 86,930,064 86,899,807 30,257 102,963 0xddc/0x5
b35a1
0 24,590 0 483 21,204,153 21,176,604 27,549 24,594 0xdf6/0x6
d955a
0 11,364 0 281 11,142,812 11,074,749 68,063 11,366 0xe06/0x7
f0576
0 12,678 0 230 10,256,884 10,224,320 32,564 12,697 0xe0c/0x8
2f0ea
0 23,613 0 434 20,392,697 20,349,744 42,953 23,728 0xe16/0x8
8eee3
0 10,843 0 182 10,415,971 10,370,611 45,360 10,964 0xe20/0x8
f47c6
0 8,959 0 274 10,281,193 10,168,378 112,815 8,959 0xe24/0x9
3922f
0 10,454 0 235 10,273,473 10,202,560 70,913 10,563 0xe2c/0x9
7be70
0 39,113 0 945 36,005,999 35,971,748 34,251 39,193 0xe56/0x5
accdf
0 33,194 0 840 32,108,563 31,996,817 111,746 33,195 0xe8a/0x7
af972
0 31,440 0 556 28,736,169 28,605,453 130,716 31,530 0xedb/0x6
7b09b
0 9,723 0 265 10,446,985 10,392,967 54,018 9,840 0xee9/0x6
e82a4
0 8,672 0 280 10,230,643 10,179,976 50,667 8,788 0xeef/0x7
20797
0 10,486 0 279 11,046,145 10,958,538 87,607 10,491 0xf09/0x8
1fe18
0 19,908 0 417 20,242,451 20,187,638 54,813 19,948 0xf11/0x8
5b12b
0 10,081 0 302 10,045,293 10,023,247 22,046 10,081 0xf13/0x8
66218
0 9,882 0 235 10,053,363 10,004,937 48,426 9,882 0xf15/0x8
7328b
0 150,847 0 3,196 158,056,449 157,994,966 61,483 150,927 0xf90/0x6
98a8c
0 17,077 0 535 20,280,697 20,210,452 70,245 17,080 0xf98/0x6
dd305
0 24,492 0 778 30,374,091 30,330,071 44,020 24,540 0xfa2/0x7
38850
0 16,047 0 484 20,187,429 20,127,635 59,794 16,216 0xfa8/0x7
66475
0 17,957 0 587 20,203,041 20,178,620 24,421 18,022 0xfae/0x7
97d96
0 18,655 0 545 20,290,674 20,201,008 89,666 18,655 0xfb4/0x7
ded08
0 20,961 0 680 30,230,987 30,091,976 139,011 20,964 0xfb8/0x8
17353
0 8,873 0 258 10,075,979 10,001,445 74,534 8,983 0xfba/0x8
29c1e
0 13,760 0 566 20,103,639 20,001,262 102,377 13,760 0xfbc/0x8
430f5
0 22,711 0 1,061 30,151,192 30,123,976 27,216 22,775 0xfc0/0x8
67f8d
0 18,003 0 569 20,054,235 20,000,730 53,505 18,005 0xfc2/0x8
75368
0 17,262 0 555 20,054,765 20,012,053 42,712 17,268 0xfc4/0x8
82955
0 12,110 0 631 20,074,663 20,004,423 70,240 12,156 0xfc6/0x8
94cfc
0 19,100 0 511 20,029,210 20,000,131 29,079 19,180 0xfc8/0x8
9bf16
0 14,124 0 732 20,052,653 20,011,165 41,488 14,127 0xfca/0x8
a8cc3
0 17,306 0 447 20,048,350 20,005,522 42,828 17,309 0xfcc/0x8
b49a1
0 4,326 0 127 5,187,590 5,187,590 0 4,326 0xfcd/0x4
1db27
</DbPrintLog>
[qs@cr3 bin]$

Similar Messages

File size difference between DNG Converter and Lightroom Beta 4

Hi,
I want to go the all-DNG route and am trying several things ATM. I want my files to be as small as possible, thus I disable previews and RAW embedding and enable compression in DNG Converter. In Lightroom, there are no options at all. What I do get, are pretty amazing file size differences:
Original .NEF as it came from my D70s: ~5MB
.DNG created by DNG Converter: ~1MB
.DNG created by Lightroom: ~4MB
The very small file size in DNG Converter is the one that bother's me most. I get these small files from time to time. I checked both the DNG and the NEF in Photoshop, and they seem to be identical. So my question is: What triggers these small file sizes? Do I loose anything? Or is the Lightroom DNG converter not as advanced as the stand alone version?
Maybe this helps: I get the ridicolous small files for very dull subjects that tell the computer scientist in me that it should be easily compressable by common compression algorithms.
Thanks for any pointers,
Markus

Thanks for the hint! It did make me revisit those files and now I see the reason for the small file sizes: The Apple Finder does note update the file size view once a file was added to a folder. Here's what I did:
Opened a folder full of .NEFs in detail view in Finder.
Converted them using DNG Converter
Looked at the sizes of the files as they were shown in the Finder window allready open.
Unfortunately, those file sizes are not correct. If I open a new Finder window of the same folder, file sizes are correctly reported as between 3.5 and 5 MB.

File size difference between version 3 and 4

I'd like to know how to publish a file at the smallest possible size with Captivate 4.
I have 1 file that is 9176KB published with Captivate 3. The same file published with Captivate 4 becomes 10300KB. I didn't add any functionality just publish it once saved in 4.
What is the same content ~1MB bigger with the new version? How do I make it smaller?
Thanks,

Thanks for the hint! It did make me revisit those files and now I see the reason for the small file sizes: The Apple Finder does note update the file size view once a file was added to a folder. Here's what I did:
Opened a folder full of .NEFs in detail view in Finder.
Converted them using DNG Converter
Looked at the sizes of the files as they were shown in the Finder window allready open.
Unfortunately, those file sizes are not correct. If I open a new Finder window of the same folder, file sizes are correctly reported as between 3.5 and 5 MB.

File size differences between cp3 and cp4

Hello
I created a cp file in captivate4 & import audio file (mp3) & published it.
swf file size was 305kb.
but when I created this file in cptivate3 & published it swf file size was 260kb.
why swf file size in cptivate3 less than cptivate4?
in two sample setting is default.
Thanks for any help.

Hello
I created a cp file in captivate4 & import audio file (mp3) & published it.
swf file size was 305kb.
but when I created this file in cptivate3 & published it swf file size was 260kb.
why swf file size in cptivate3 less than cptivate4?
in two sample setting is default.
Thanks for any help.

File size differences between Acrobat 5.0 and Acrobat 8.0

We have a system where we incorporate .pdf files into word documents. When we use v8.0 the .pdf files suddenly become very much larger (e.g. the word document containing the v5.0 PDFs, around 29 of them, is 1,224kb but is 2,376kb when we use v8.0 PDFs). The .PDF's are created by printing to PDF995 and then using Acrobat to open them, select a section of the page, and copy/paste them into the Word document.
Has anyone come across this before and, if so, how do we tune v8.0?

Thank you for the quick response. We are able to get some results through the Optimizer however they are not the same. Also we would like to keep from adding an extra step into the process. Especially a step that adds a lot of time to the process as the Optimizer does. In versions 7 and 8 we did not have run the Optimizer (we also did not have to do this in version 5 back in the day). Why would 9 have to add this step? I am really looking for a way to keep the same workflow steps. -Dan

Font size difference between Dreamweaver, view in Safari and on friend's PC

In Dreamweaver CS3, I have a table with two cells containing type. In order to get the type to not appear too large, I need to size the type down to 6pt size on screen in Dreamweaver, then it appears like about 10pt normal size text in my Safari browser on a Mac and then it appears too small, but readable and larger than what I am seeing in Dreamweaver on a friend's PC through AOL. This mystifies me as it is only happening on this one page. When I leave the paragraph text at normal size in this table cell it becomes way too large when viewed in the Safari browser, so what I am doing is sizing it down to 40% (miniscule) in dreamweaver so it will come up in the browser as normal paragraph text size.
Never had this happen before. Any Ideas?
TIA,
Ken

I would strip this site back to basics by removing all font sizes in your CSS.
Then avoid %.
Re-build font sizes just using px.
Don't mix units (ems, % etc) until you have a consistent baseline and reason for doing so..
Pt is solid and reliable on paper. Px is solid and reliable on screen.

Slight file size discrepencies between identical photos?

While looking at the metadata of photos I am working with, I have noticed that identical photos in every single aspect of pertinent metadata (lense, focal, other various exif data) happens to have a slight file size discrepency. For instance, a dscf2001 has a file size of 752kbs and the duplicate dscf2001 has the file size of 732kbs. These photos have not been altered in any manner.
This situation happens with a large portion of my duplicate photos. One photo's file size is slightly bigger or smaller than the other photo that is the identical version in every single aspect minus the slight file size difference. Is this a math situation? If I open with another program will these photos appear as the same file size?
Thanks

They have been copied between drives with different filesystems (iphoto and aperture and old macbook to new macbook). Maybe this is the issue?
How did you transit your images from iPhoto? Did you export them from iPhoto or import the iPhoto library? Have the images you are comparing been imported from iPhoto at the same time, from the same iPhoto versions?
If you compare the original master image files of the images in question in the Finder, do the originals have the same size?

SaveForWeb file size difference of scripted versus manually created

I've got a VB script that uses Save For Web to make thumbnail images from a folder of larger images. Most perplexing is the file size difference of these thumbnails using the script versus making them one by one manually.
The thumbnails are 180x120 pixels. Using Save for Web from the file menu to manually create jpegs (50 quality, optimized, no profile, no progressive) the typical resultant file sizes are 9 to 14 KB. Using the script, the file sizes end up from 20KB to 30KB! Additionally, if the original file has any metadata (caption, contact info, copyright, etc) the manual process strips all the metadata out except the copyright notice, which is fine. Using the script however, all metadata remains intact!!
Can anyone explain why this is occurring? I'd sure like the smallest file size possible. Am I missing a parameter in the ExportSaveForWeb options?
Here's this save section of the code:
     Dim sfwOptions As New ExportOptionsSaveForWeb
     sfwOptions.Format = psJPEGSave
     sfwOptions.Quality = 50
     sfwOptions.Optimized = True
     sfwOptions.IncludeProfile = False
     SaveFile = OutputFolder & ImageNumber & ".jpg"
     docRef.Export SaveFile, PsExportType.psSaveForWeb, sfwOptions
Thanks in advance for any insights and guidance.
(BTW, I get a similar file size disparity with javascript too although they end up a tad smaller than the VB script, go figure...)
Tom
PS - The VB Scripting Guide has the wrong name for the Export Document method. It is not "ExportDocument" but rather, simply "Export". Hopefully this tip will save someone hours and hours of frustration and confusion ;-)

Eureka, I found the issue! Now pass the ********...
In the options in the Save for Web window (the two small gray arrows next to the Preset drop down list), on one of the panels there is a checkbox to Preserve Metadata. This was unchecked. Apparently, it was not seen as unchecked when running the script yet behaved accordingly when I did a manual save. Checking this box and clicking apply, run a manual save, then unchecking the box and clicking apply appeared to "reset" it to not save metadata (other than copyright info) either when saving manually or then using the script.
Case closed.

Size difference between 60GB and 80GB?

Is there a size difference between the 60GB and 80GB iPod with videos? I was looking at a Belkin Tunepower power source for my iPod and it said it has sleeves for 30GB and 60GB iPod videos, but I just checked the Apple store and they only sell 30 and 80 gig iPods. Will my 80GB fit the 60GB sleeve?

Your 80 GB ought to fit the 60 GB case, since the exact dimensions of both iPods are identical:
60 GB: 4.1 x 2.4 x 0.55 inches
80 GB: 4.1 x 2.4 x 0.55 inches
Of course, if you are using a 30 GB, that would be different, since the 30 GB is a little thinner than the 60 and 80 GB models of Fifth Generations.
-Kylene

Differences Between The Asus P67 EVO And Pro?

Anyone know of the differences between the Asus P67 EVO and the Pro?
I want to buy an Asus P67 Pro Motherboard today, but there are only 2 left at Fry's and they are both open-box returns and the other Fry's has only 6 left and ALL are open-box returns. So I'm thinking there may be an issue with the Pro's?
Is the EVO just as good?
On the Asus site specs, it seems the only differences are:
(and I'm not sure what any of the following means)
-On the Pro, the PCIe x16-3 slot shares bandwidth with the ESATA12
-On the EVO, the PCIe x16-3 slot shares bandwidth with the ESATA3G and the PESATA3G
-The EVO has dual LAN's
-The EVO has a CMOS Switch
-The Pro has the "System Panel" Q-Connector
Adobe seems to be heading towards allowing 2 video cards.
Would the EVO limit me if this happens?
I notice there's only one EVO on the PPBM5 site in the upper realms (Novak).
There seems to be more Pro's.
I don't plan on doing huge overclocking, maybe minor.
Components to be used:
-i7 2600K
-Corsair Vengeance 16GB
-Corsair AX 850 Watt Gold
-EVGA GTX 460 1GB Superclocked
-OCZ Agility 3 SSD 120GB
-Seagate Barracuda 3GB Storage
-Seagate Barracuda 1GB for Exports, Page File, Previews, Media Cache
-Seagate Barracuda 3GB Storage in Acomdata Samba External Enclosure for Backup
-WD My Book 3GB External for Another Backup
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks Guys.

addiZ wrote:
I'm going to use my MacBook mainly for gaming and editing videos
Don't get the 13". It only has an integrated video card. Both the 15" and 17" models have an integrated as well as a dedicated video card.

What is the difference between the 4th generation ipad and the ipad 3 with retnia display?

What is the difference between the 4th generation iPad and the "New iPad with retina display"? i don't quite understand. are they stilll the same size or would i have to get a different case?

The 3rd and 4th generation iPads are the same size. The 4 has a faster processor, and a little better iSight camera for FaceTime. The 4 also has the lightning connector so your old cable will not work with the iPad 4.
You should always check with the manufacturer of the case to see if it will fit. You can probably do that on the manufacturers website.
This might be of some interest to you.
http://www.zdnet.com/ipad-4-teardown-pretty-much-the-same-as-the-ipad-3-70000068 33/

Difference between ALC Forms ES module and ALC Output ES module

Hi,
I would like to know if anyone has implemented just the Adobe Output ES module in any of the projects.
I am into a project where we are integrating ALC with one of the insurance application for document generation and correspondence generation.
Confused whether to go with Forms ES module, Output ES module or both?
Can someone please throw light on these modules? I know there is info on the website but would like to know the advantages and disadvnantages of using either one of the module or both?
If just Output module is used how will the insurance application interact with ALC?

Jianghuai,
The link you have gotten from Ivan provides great information sources.
Note that those are not four different distributions, meaning linux-based operating systems, all are RHEL -- check out the FAQ, items 1 and 2. I would say main differences between family members are licensing and support offerings or subscriptions. AS, ES for "server" and WS, Desktop for the "desktop".
"ES is licensed for servers with up to 2 CPUs and 16GB of main memory while AS is licensed for servers of any size and any architecture."
Oracle products are generally not supported on the desktop variants.

Difference between SAP-CRM 2007 UI and previous version UI.

hi,
anyone knows the differences difference between SAP-CRM 2007 UI and previous version UI.
anykind of links or files are helpful.
regards.
raman.

Hi,
actually quite a late response and I think all the rather technically focuses comments have already been given, incl. the link to a really good slide deck, that explains all the technical architecture details on what exactly we did.
From an end user perspective some other statements on what we did:
(1) From an information architecture and visualization perspective we acted based on feedback from our customers in the last years, which led to some restructuring of the screen, e.g. moving the navigation bar from the top area of the screen (horizontal) to the left hand side --> sounds simple but users tend to have problem seeing thing at the top of the screen. We also decided to arrange the information for e.g. an account or an opportunity not in a tab oriented format. Again usability tests in CRM had shown that users often find it hard to see and understand that tabs contain additional information. We now show the details in assignment blocks below the header information in a scrollable format. Vertical scrolling is a behavior of a screen that most users know from their internet experience. Those are just two exampels of what we did in this area
(2) We also have put a large focus on well known web behaviors, like drag & drop and personalization in general, knowing that on the one hand side, no matter what standard UI we deliver, users tend to adapt it exactly based on their needs and wishes. So you will find really easy to understand personalization options everywhere in the new CRM Web Client UI. To achieve this we used lots of web 2.0 techologies that enable especially these easy interactive capabilitites.
(3) Finally, and this relates directly to the arguments mentioned in (2) we focused as well on really easy UI configuration. Again, in every customer project user interface changes are made, to adapt the SAP default to the customers needs. here we invested a lot to make the 60-80% most common UI changes done in projects as easy as possible, that even non-technical people can generally do it (like Power users).
Hope this clarifies some arguments what from the users point of view has been done and what the advantages are.
When you follow the same link as mentioned by Nadine above, you can also find a presentation UI Concept, which explains all the details rather from a users perspective.
Best regards and enjoy the new UI ..and every feedback is very much welcome, only with your feedback we can improve the solution even more.
Ingo

How to find out difference between IAS Oracle Home patches and 10.1.2 Oracl

How to find out difference between IAS Oracle Home patches and 10.1.2 Oracle Home patches.
I have read me document but i could not able to understand.
Please help me

user10721329 wrote:
How to find out difference between IAS Oracle Home patches and 10.1.2 Oracle Home patches.
I have read me document but i could not able to understand.
Please help meWhat docoument you are referring to?
If you source the application env file APPS<CONTEXT_NAME>.env file under $APPL_TOP directory then this will set ORACLE_HOME to 10.1.2
If you source the application env file <CONTEXT_NAME>.env file under $INST_TOP/ora/10.1.3 directory then this will set ORACLE_HOME to 10.1.3
Environment Settings
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E18727_01/doc.121/e12841/T120505T120509.htm#F_92659x3Ax20H1x20Head1x3Ax20Environmentx20Settings
Thanks,
Hussein

What's the difference between old SAP appraisal system and the new SAP appraisal system?

Hi Experts,
What's the difference between old SAP appraisal system and the new SAP appraisal system?
Can anyone shed some light please.
Thanks.

emgr_update no longer sets or gets the thesaurus from workbench. In 11 all workbench configurations are saved in IFCR configuration directly.
Hence the thesaurus entry should be added directly in version 11 Workbench as opposed to xml file in older versions.
And if you want to migrate the changes across environments then import_site script in control directory can be used.

File size differences between JE 3.3.87 and

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for