SaveForWeb file size difference of scripted versus manually created

I've got a VB script that uses Save For Web to make thumbnail images from a folder of larger images.  Most perplexing is the file size difference of these thumbnails using the script versus making them one by one manually.
The thumbnails are 180x120 pixels.  Using Save for Web from the file menu to manually create jpegs (50 quality, optimized, no profile, no progressive) the typical resultant file sizes are 9 to 14 KB.  Using the script, the file sizes end up from 20KB to 30KB!  Additionally, if the original file has any metadata (caption, contact info, copyright, etc) the manual process strips all the metadata out except the copyright notice, which is fine.  Using the script however, all metadata remains intact!!
Can anyone explain why this is occurring?  I'd sure like the smallest file size possible.  Am I missing a parameter in the ExportSaveForWeb options?
Here's this save section of the code:
     Dim sfwOptions As New ExportOptionsSaveForWeb
     sfwOptions.Format = psJPEGSave
     sfwOptions.Quality = 50
     sfwOptions.Optimized = True
     sfwOptions.IncludeProfile = False
     SaveFile = OutputFolder & ImageNumber & ".jpg"
     docRef.Export SaveFile, PsExportType.psSaveForWeb, sfwOptions
Thanks in advance for any insights and guidance.
(BTW, I get a similar file size disparity with javascript too although they end up a tad smaller than the VB script, go figure...)
Tom
PS - The VB Scripting Guide has the wrong name for the Export Document method.  It is not "ExportDocument" but rather, simply "Export".  Hopefully this tip will save someone hours and hours of frustration and confusion ;-)

Eureka, I found the issue!  Now pass the ********...
In the options in the Save for Web window (the two small gray arrows next to the Preset drop down list), on one of the panels there is a checkbox to Preserve Metadata.  This was unchecked.  Apparently, it was not seen as unchecked when running the script yet behaved accordingly when I did a manual save.  Checking this box and clicking apply, run a manual save, then unchecking the box and clicking apply appeared to "reset" it to not save metadata (other than copyright info) either when saving manually or then using the script.
Case closed.

Similar Messages

  • File size difference between DNG Converter and Lightroom Beta 4

    Hi,
    I want to go the all-DNG route and am trying several things ATM. I want my files to be as small as possible, thus I disable previews and RAW embedding and enable compression in DNG Converter. In Lightroom, there are no options at all. What I do get, are pretty amazing file size differences:
    Original .NEF as it came from my D70s: ~5MB
    .DNG created by DNG Converter: ~1MB
    .DNG created by Lightroom: ~4MB
    The very small file size in DNG Converter is the one that bother's me most. I get these small files from time to time. I checked both the DNG and the NEF in Photoshop, and they seem to be identical. So my question is: What triggers these small file sizes? Do I loose anything? Or is the Lightroom DNG converter not as advanced as the stand alone version?
    Maybe this helps: I get the ridicolous small files for very dull subjects that tell the computer scientist in me that it should be easily compressable by common compression algorithms.
    Thanks for any pointers,
    Markus

    Thanks for the hint! It did make me revisit those files and now I see the reason for the small file sizes: The Apple Finder does note update the file size view once a file was added to a folder. Here's what I did:
    Opened a folder full of .NEFs in detail view in Finder.
    Converted them using DNG Converter
    Looked at the sizes of the files as they were shown in the Finder window allready open.
    Unfortunately, those file sizes are not correct. If I open a new Finder window of the same folder, file sizes are correctly reported as between 3.5 and 5 MB.

  • File size differences between cp3 and cp4

    Hello
    I created a cp file in captivate4 & import audio file (mp3) & published it.
    swf file size was 305kb.
    but when I created this file in cptivate3 & published it swf file size was 260kb.
    why swf file size in cptivate3 less than cptivate4?
    in two sample setting is default.
    Thanks for any help.

    Hello
    I created a cp file in captivate4 & import audio file (mp3) & published it.
    swf file size was 305kb.
    but when I created this file in cptivate3 & published it swf file size was 260kb.
    why swf file size in cptivate3 less than cptivate4?
    in two sample setting is default.
    Thanks for any help.

  • File size differences

    Two questions ...
    1. I'm getting the following warning ...
    I think that a TIFF file bigger than 2 gb does not create any quality issue in LR - PS workflow ... correct?
    It is just related with some third party programs, as the warning box says.
    2. This file .. an uncompressed TIFF file ... it is 1 gb inside the PS and it is 2.21 gb in the system folder.
    Where is this difference coming from?
    Thanks ...

    So, what is the job of this info panel?
    Does it show memory usage for this image?
    I don't think so ...
    Reference says that ...
    "Displays information on the amount of data in the image. The number on the left represents the printing size of the image—approximately the size of the saved, flattened file in Adobe Photoshop format. The number on the right indicates the file’s approximate size including layers and channels."
    My file as a PSD file is 1.48 gb in the system folder ... there is also a big difference.
    Can anyone clarify this info item?
    Thanks ...

  • OSX or Time Capsule? file size differences

    So i have my music library on my 500GB time capsule.
    i also have it backed up to two different 1TB harddrives (they all report the same amount of files and size)
    each 1TB states there are 159.23GB space used by the Music folder with 184 Folders
    the 500GB time capsule states: 93.68GB of space used with the same amount of folders.
    I did an individual file size check of every folder on each drive using the optcmdI and they all reported the same size.
    is there anyway to figure out why this stating differing file sizes?
    Time Capsule
    1TB drive

    I agree that it doesn't make sense, especially that extreme of a difference.
    I might be that not all of the data was transferred to the drive with the smaller sized music collection. And just because there are the same amount of folders on each drive does not mean there are the same amount of actual music files in each of those folders.
    When copying data, any folders are copied first, then the files within those folders are copied. If your transfer failed for any reason (with or without your knowledge) it was most likely after the folders had been copied but before all the files within those folders had been copied.
    I hope that makes sense.
    - Mike

  • Huge binary file size difference LV 6.1 to LV 8.2

    I have an application that was first developed under LabVIEW 4.2 and has been periodically upgraded as necessary.  It is normally run as a built application so LabVIEW version changes only come in when something in the application has to be changed.  That occasion occurred and we changed from LabVIEW 6.1 to LabVIEW 8.2 for the build environment.  No changes were made to any of the file handling vis (other than what LabVIEW did in the conversion, which I didn't check at all).
    The problem is that this application writes a large structure (4320 elements in each of 13 single-precision variables) into a binary file once a day.  When I started the new version of the application the size of the files went from 242956 bytes to 775334 bytes.
    The vi to read these files still works for the old files as well as the new files and a set of C routines that I use to read the files seems to also work correctly with the new files - at least the data looks like it is supposed to when it is plotted.
    The change in file size is a concern since this application is supposed to keep writing these files every day for many years into the future.
    Is there any known way to return to the original behavior with the smaller files?

    Hi Bryan,
    you say: "all changes are made with rotates and insert elements to prefent the arrays from growing"!
    You should use "replace array elements" to prevent array growth!!! Please check this with your application!
    Best regards,
    GerdW
    CLAD, using 2009SP1 + LV2011SP1 + LV2014SP1 on WinXP+Win7+cRIO
    Kudos are welcome

  • Export file size differences

    I'm am trying to export my iPhoto library to a new machine, I don't want to simply copy the iPhoto library folder as a lot of junk has built up over the years and I want to do a fresh import.
    What I am doing is dragging my events out of iPhoto and into folders in Finder, however I've noticed that sometimes the file size of what is copied out of iPhoto differs from the size is gives within iPhoto
    Any ideas why this would be? It shouldn't be doing any kind of compression on dragging out of iPhoto shout it? I assumed it would just copy the photo (original or modified) but this doesn't seem to be the case.
    Any ideas?
    Cheers

    This User Tip
    https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-4921
    has details of the options in the Export dialogue.
    Remember that if you go this route then you break the non-destructive editing feature or lose all the work you have previously done in iPhoto.
    To move an iPhoto Library to a new machine:
    Link the two Macs together: there are several ways to do this: Wireless Network,Firewire Target Disk Mode, Ethernet, or even just copy the Library to an external HD and then on to the new machine...
    But however you do choose to link the two machines...
    Simply copy the iPhoto Library from the Pictures Folder on the old Machine to the Pictures Folder on the new Machine.
    Then launch iPhoto. That's it.
    This moves photos, events, albums, books, keywords, slideshows and everything else.

  • Exported Wraptor dcp File-Size difference and quality loss

    Hi,
    I am currently working on exporting a short trailer (45 sec) to wraptor-dcp with AME straight from an After Effects project.
    In the export-preferences the estimated files size is about 8000MB (check out the screenshot).
    But the finalized dcp only has a size of 180MB. That irritated me so I downloaded a demo of easyDCP to check the material. The dcp is working fine but the quality is a mess even in comparison to a small mp4 (take a look at the second comparison screenshot: dcp left and mp4 (H264) on the right). Gradients are destroyed and chunky.
    Also with the color transformation off, the colors feel dull and only fit if I choose 'X'Y'Z » R'G'B (P3). Should it be that way? How can I enhance the quality of the dcp?
    All the best,
    Jay
    1 Export Settings (I just choose the wraptor setting in AME '2K Digital Cinema Flat' and did not change any settings)
    2. Comparison dcp / mp4 (H264)

    Will there be a new update coming soon?
    Problem: Wraptor DCP will play on GDC-TMS 8.0 at one theater and will not play at another theater running GDC-TMS 9.0
    Identified: Xsize/Ysize problems when reading on GDC-TMS 9.0. XOsize is wacked!
    Although GDC-TMS is part of the problem...please help fix the Wraptor DCP part of the problem!
    -Eric
    Geek-4-Hire
    @DailyGeekTip

  • File size differences in Premiere

    Hello,
    I've been using FCP for years, and with the Apple situation there, I recently switched to Premiere, and I have to say, I'm very happy I did.  So far, I really like it.
    My issue is with file sizes of final outputs.
    In FCP, my file sizes were (for a 30 second TV spot) genereally at least in the several hundred MB.  Now, when I compress them using the Adobe Media Encoder, (doing my absolute best to keep the same settings) and every file size is 35MB...
    It sounds silly to complain, and the files LOOK good, the TV stations have accepted them without a problem, I'm just concerned I'm doing something wrong and missing something. 
    I do Export/Media from Premiere.  I convert to Quicktime/H.264.
    I match the source settings, and click every box that says to Maximize Render Quality, etc...
    Nothing seems to change the end file size, always about 35MB.
    When I did it in FCP, I just did the Quicktime Export, then ran it through MPG Stremclip to make it a H264.
    These files were always at least 235MB.
    Thank you for your help!
    Johnny X

    ...the TV stations have accepted them without a problem, I'm just concerned I'm doing something wrong and missing something.
    So, I tried with no limits and the file size was huge.
    Any recommendation for where that should be set?
    Normally, broadcasters will specify a target bitrate
    for submitted files in their spec sheet.
    Like this:
    SD/HD Master File Specifications - Extreme Reach
    http://www.extremereach.com/pdf/SD-HD-Master-File-Specs.pdf
    And this:
    DG - File-Based content submission
    https://spotcentral.dgit.com/docs/HDMSD_OneSheet.pdf
    I would check there.

  • Same data essentially - significant file size differences

    I have 13 separate .aif files. I've decided I should have Normalized them. As they will be played as a CD I thought to create a huge new file copy/pasting the contents of each separate into the new. No problem. So why does is the size of the new file double the total of the individual files? No conversion or any other thing done to the files - just copy/paste.
    I hate mysteries.
    Thanks,
    tim

    ...the TV stations have accepted them without a problem, I'm just concerned I'm doing something wrong and missing something.
    So, I tried with no limits and the file size was huge.
    Any recommendation for where that should be set?
    Normally, broadcasters will specify a target bitrate
    for submitted files in their spec sheet.
    Like this:
    SD/HD Master File Specifications - Extreme Reach
    http://www.extremereach.com/pdf/SD-HD-Master-File-Specs.pdf
    And this:
    DG - File-Based content submission
    https://spotcentral.dgit.com/docs/HDMSD_OneSheet.pdf
    I would check there.

  • File size differences between JE 3.3.87 and

    Our application when using JE 4.1.17 builds a database that is 3.5 times larger than when using JE 3.3.87.
    Is this expected? Is there anything we can do with 4.1.17 to build smaller file size DB?
    Chuck Koscher

    I also ran DbPrintLog on the partial 4.1.17 built Db (gona take more time to run on the ver 3 DB). What does this all mean?
    [qs@cr3 bin]$ more DbPrintLog.out
    <DbPrintLog>
    Log statistics:
    type total provisional total min max avg entries
    count count bytes bytes bytes bytes as % of log
    LN 1,641,390 0 635,530,086 37 38,103 387 35.8
    MapLN 39,660 0 129,537,451 50 5,377 3,266 7.3
    NameLN 5 0 426 35 111 85 0
    DupCountLN 31,568 84 891,783 22 32 28 0.1
    FileSummaryLN 2,978,385 0 203,225,292 28 38,130 68 11.5
    IN 176,586 16,952 281,957,554 44 9,735 1,596 15.9
    BIN 216,441 64,082 356,220,165 44 10,188 1,645 20.1
    DIN 40,046 2,111 22,350,697 85 5,425 558 1.3
    DBIN 42,555 2,907 143,815,258 71 10,146 3,379 8.1
    Root 168 0 452,371 123 3,719 2,692 0
    CkptStart 68 0 2,101 29 31 30 0
    CkptEnd 66 0 4,179 57 64 63 0
    BINDelta 175 0 17,715 35 1,507 101 0
    DupBINDelta 22 0 3,996 51 1,361 181 0
    Trace 450 0 69,440 46 305 154 0
    FileHeader 178 0 6,764 38 38 38 0
    key/data 578,081,436 (32.6)
    Total bytes in portion of log read: 1,774,085,278
    Total number of entries: 5,167,763
    Per checkpoint interval info:
    lnTxn ln mapLNTxn mapLN end-end end-start start-end maxLNReplay ckpt
    End
    0 6 0 3 10,016,254 10,002,932 13,322 6 0x2/0x3f7
    e
    0 21,291 0 209 20,537,114 20,353,908 183,206 21,294 0x10/0x87
    198
    0 10,557 0 141 10,187,476 10,044,801 142,675 10,723 0x14/0xb4
    dec
    0 41,526 0 900 46,753,313 46,610,643 142,670 41,612 0x203/0x7
    25a0d
    0 35,418 0 711 41,367,099 41,354,438 12,661 35,538 0x314/0x8
    73648
    0 7,992 0 187 9,537,017 9,521,859 15,158 7,992 0x349/0x8
    025c1
    0 10,424 0 185 10,332,196 10,238,081 94,115 10,426 0x34f/0x8
    53765
    0 10,467 0 216 10,123,100 10,110,090 13,010 10,562 0x353/0x8
    71841
    0 8,814 0 190 10,170,639 10,012,047 158,592 8,816 0x355/0x8
    9b2d0
    0 20,157 0 585 24,985,565 24,896,315 89,250 20,233 0x3d2/0x3
    d2f2d
    0 8,614 0 197 10,266,414 10,227,891 38,523 8,681 0x3da/0x4
    13fdb
    0 29,407 0 709 34,661,770 34,645,633 16,137 29,408 0x45a/0x8
    861e5
    0 8,512 0 203 10,694,331 10,622,804 71,527 8,513 0x46a/0x9
    2fa20
    0 17,131 0 349 20,149,317 20,118,102 31,215 17,153 0x470/0x9
    54165
    0 50,120 0 1,106 56,983,602 56,958,921 24,681 50,120 0x533/0x6
    73a97
    0 16,608 0 418 20,484,484 20,467,444 17,040 16,619 0x53f/0x6
    e9f1b
    0 16,920 0 395 20,846,145 20,819,500 26,645 16,920 0x557/0x7
    b885c
    0 9,033 0 219 10,860,030 10,834,496 25,534 9,037 0x56f/0x8
    8a7da
    0 68,165 0 1,762 90,245,785 90,214,129 31,656 68,168 0x68e/0x8
    c67f3
    0 9,140 0 200 9,904,174 9,827,759 76,415 69,294 0x800/0x8
    af1a1
    0 9,032 0 215 10,299,639 10,201,642 97,997 9,095 0x80a/0x8
    f8418
    0 66,535 0 1,462 75,431,349 75,410,311 21,038 66,600 0x880/0x4
    9cdcd
    0 8,504 0 222 10,680,253 10,659,337 20,916 8,507 0x896/0x5
    42f0a
    0 17,543 0 632 20,080,030 20,050,546 29,484 17,546 0x89a/0x5
    567a8
    0 25,548 0 617 32,433,830 32,368,958 64,872 25,564 0x8d6/0x7
    a8ace
    0 9,710 0 238 10,564,761 10,547,253 17,508 9,728 0x8ee/0x8
    328e7
    0 21,166 0 884 26,557,127 26,363,082 194,045 21,167 0x93f/0x4
    ea02e
    0 133,812 0 2,755 133,366,171 133,318,671 47,500 133,887 0xb95/0x8
    1fd49
    0 39,793 0 844 41,359,213 41,308,651 50,562 134,394 0xbbf/0x9
    6bab6
    0 56,793 0 1,231 52,693,165 52,642,716 50,449 56,796 0xc0a/0x2
    73c63
    0 26,444 0 418 23,694,267 23,628,234 66,033 26,503 0xc1a/0x5
    f9b1e
    0 23,730 0 459 22,482,062 22,376,959 105,103 23,790 0xc52/0x8
    57aac
    0 10,907 0 264 10,299,749 10,258,468 41,281 10,980 0xc5c/0x8
    a0d91
    0 102,960 0 2,034 86,930,064 86,899,807 30,257 102,963 0xddc/0x5
    b35a1
    0 24,590 0 483 21,204,153 21,176,604 27,549 24,594 0xdf6/0x6
    d955a
    0 11,364 0 281 11,142,812 11,074,749 68,063 11,366 0xe06/0x7
    f0576
    0 12,678 0 230 10,256,884 10,224,320 32,564 12,697 0xe0c/0x8
    2f0ea
    0 23,613 0 434 20,392,697 20,349,744 42,953 23,728 0xe16/0x8
    8eee3
    0 10,843 0 182 10,415,971 10,370,611 45,360 10,964 0xe20/0x8
    f47c6
    0 8,959 0 274 10,281,193 10,168,378 112,815 8,959 0xe24/0x9
    3922f
    0 10,454 0 235 10,273,473 10,202,560 70,913 10,563 0xe2c/0x9
    7be70
    0 39,113 0 945 36,005,999 35,971,748 34,251 39,193 0xe56/0x5
    accdf
    0 33,194 0 840 32,108,563 31,996,817 111,746 33,195 0xe8a/0x7
    af972
    0 31,440 0 556 28,736,169 28,605,453 130,716 31,530 0xedb/0x6
    7b09b
    0 9,723 0 265 10,446,985 10,392,967 54,018 9,840 0xee9/0x6
    e82a4
    0 8,672 0 280 10,230,643 10,179,976 50,667 8,788 0xeef/0x7
    20797
    0 10,486 0 279 11,046,145 10,958,538 87,607 10,491 0xf09/0x8
    1fe18
    0 19,908 0 417 20,242,451 20,187,638 54,813 19,948 0xf11/0x8
    5b12b
    0 10,081 0 302 10,045,293 10,023,247 22,046 10,081 0xf13/0x8
    66218
    0 9,882 0 235 10,053,363 10,004,937 48,426 9,882 0xf15/0x8
    7328b
    0 150,847 0 3,196 158,056,449 157,994,966 61,483 150,927 0xf90/0x6
    98a8c
    0 17,077 0 535 20,280,697 20,210,452 70,245 17,080 0xf98/0x6
    dd305
    0 24,492 0 778 30,374,091 30,330,071 44,020 24,540 0xfa2/0x7
    38850
    0 16,047 0 484 20,187,429 20,127,635 59,794 16,216 0xfa8/0x7
    66475
    0 17,957 0 587 20,203,041 20,178,620 24,421 18,022 0xfae/0x7
    97d96
    0 18,655 0 545 20,290,674 20,201,008 89,666 18,655 0xfb4/0x7
    ded08
    0 20,961 0 680 30,230,987 30,091,976 139,011 20,964 0xfb8/0x8
    17353
    0 8,873 0 258 10,075,979 10,001,445 74,534 8,983 0xfba/0x8
    29c1e
    0 13,760 0 566 20,103,639 20,001,262 102,377 13,760 0xfbc/0x8
    430f5
    0 22,711 0 1,061 30,151,192 30,123,976 27,216 22,775 0xfc0/0x8
    67f8d
    0 18,003 0 569 20,054,235 20,000,730 53,505 18,005 0xfc2/0x8
    75368
    0 17,262 0 555 20,054,765 20,012,053 42,712 17,268 0xfc4/0x8
    82955
    0 12,110 0 631 20,074,663 20,004,423 70,240 12,156 0xfc6/0x8
    94cfc
    0 19,100 0 511 20,029,210 20,000,131 29,079 19,180 0xfc8/0x8
    9bf16
    0 14,124 0 732 20,052,653 20,011,165 41,488 14,127 0xfca/0x8
    a8cc3
    0 17,306 0 447 20,048,350 20,005,522 42,828 17,309 0xfcc/0x8
    b49a1
    0 4,326 0 127 5,187,590 5,187,590 0 4,326 0xfcd/0x4
    1db27
    </DbPrintLog>
    [qs@cr3 bin]$

  • File size difference between version 3 and 4

    I'd like to know how to publish a file at the smallest possible size with Captivate 4.
    I have 1 file that is 9176KB published with Captivate 3. The same file published with Captivate 4 becomes 10300KB. I didn't add any functionality just publish it once saved in 4.
    What is the same content ~1MB bigger with the new version? How do I make it smaller?
    Thanks,

    Thanks for the hint! It did make me revisit those files and now I see the reason for the small file sizes: The Apple Finder does note update the file size view once a file was added to a folder. Here's what I did:
    Opened a folder full of .NEFs in detail view in Finder.
    Converted them using DNG Converter
    Looked at the sizes of the files as they were shown in the Finder window allready open.
    Unfortunately, those file sizes are not correct. If I open a new Finder window of the same folder, file sizes are correctly reported as between 3.5 and 5 MB.

  • Need a create db script to manually create a 10g rman catalog db on unix

    Hi, Gurus:
    I would like to manually create a rman catalog database (Oracle 10g) on a HP-UX environment. Could anyone share a sql script to do that?
    It is going to be used to backup about 15 databases directly to tape and the retention policy is going to be 35 days. How big the database should be?
    Thanks in advance.

    I can't find any documentation supporting Oracle support's theory.And who writes the Oracle documentation? People in this forum?
    You got the "Best Practice" advise.
    If you have rman catalog on the same server or on the same database, it is like storing your backup on the same server you took it from.
    So, the idea od RMAN catalog is to have your catalog available for any recovery. If you cannot recover your recovery catalog, then you are better off using the controlfile as the repository.

  • JPG file size differences in ACR and PS

    Camera: Nikon D80
    Photoshop: CS3 Extended v.10.0.1
    ACR: version 4.3.1
    Saving from ACR, Q=9 -> 1,2Mb
    Saving from ACR, Q=10 -> 1,8Mb
    PS, Q=11 (no thumbnail) -> 3,1Mb
    PS, Q=11 (with thumbnail) -> 3,1Mb (no difference)
    PS, Q=12 (no thumbnail) -> 5,8Mb
    PS, Q=12 (with thumbnail -> 5,8Mb (no difference)
    Save for Web, Q=90: 3,7Mb (larger than PS/11)
    Save for Web, Q=100: 5,8Mb (same as PS/12)
    1.) Why ACR saves much smaller files?
    2.) Why there isn't difference when saving with thumbnail or not?
    3.) Why the different methods?
    4.) Is any of them better? If yes: why the other? If not: why does it exist?
    Saving from ACR produces much smaller files than any other known RAW converter. I've tried Bibble, Lightroom, CaptureNX, DxO and all of them created nearly the same size as Photoshop does. So the most important question: why ACR creates so small JPG files?
    Thanks in advance!

    Huhh,
    the question isn't stupid, just seems a little bit strange in my point of view. But you're right, i must confess. So halfway i am the stupid, not the question (and not the software).
    But when i choose 'maximum' in ACR it gives me the 10, and i thought maximum is the maximum. For me it tells about the highest possible quality. There is no value bigger than the maximum.
    I've never realize that in PS the way is exactly the same like in ACR! In PS the maximum is 10 too!! I'm always enter the value by the keyboard and never choose a preset. And in PS there's a slider showing the full scale and the entered value, so on that i can see that there's life after the maximum. in ACR the missing slider suggested me that 10 is the top level. But now i've entered 11 and 12 and gave the same sizes as i gave from PS with 11 and 12.
    So i can conclude that the GUI of ACR isn't perfect (OK, i *must* now it uses the same engine/values like PS), but the method behind the scenes is perfect, like in PS. Sorry for the trouble and thanks for the very fast answer!

  • IPhoto Library Manager--File Size difference of merged library

    I just use iPhoto Library Manager to merge 2 libraries and it worked great. There is a huge difference in the size of the libraries. The original library is 17.48 GB. The merged library which had an additional 4.03 GB of pictures/events added to it is only 11.28 GB. I would have expected 17.48 GB + 4.03 GB to add up to 21.51 GB. Can anyone explain? What has been lost?
    Additional info: I get the same 244 events and 4426 pictures whether I open the iPhoto Library or the "Merged Library" through the finder window.
    I have iPhoto 7.1.3 and iPLM 3.4.2 installed.

    Do you sync your photos with an iPod using iTunes? If so this creates a cache file that can be very large indeed. It would not be carried over in the Merge.
    Regards
    TD

Maybe you are looking for