Filter sort criteria

Hallo,
in den Spalten des Bibliotheksfilter werden die Filterergebnisse aufsteigend sortiert nach dem Wert auf der rechten Seite
z.B. Dateityp
Dateityp
JPEG
12000
PNG
400
RAW
500
TIFF
600
stattdessen möchte ich gerne eine sortierte, aufsteigende Darstellung wie folgt haben:
Dateityp
PNG
400
RAW
500
TIFF
600
JPEG
12000
Bei der sortiert wird nach der Anzahl der Werte.
Ist das irgendwie möglich gegebenenfalls auch durch ein Plugin.
Wäre für jeden Hinweis/Tipp dankbar.
Anmerkung: Obiges Beispiel macht sicherlich keinen Sinn aber ich habe einen Anwendungsfall mit einem selbst geschriebenen Plugin das MD5 Hash-Codes erzeugt und da macht es durchaus Sinn in Verbindung mit der Suche nach Duplikaten!
Gruß
Christoph

Sorry,
I just realised this is a english forum!
So again:
I like to sort the filter row against the value and not the criteria.
Please see above table e.g.
Is this possible within a plugin?
regards
Christoph

Similar Messages

ADF FACES: how to preserve the sort criteria for an af:table

How can I preserve the sort criteria on an af:table across page invocations? I've searched all through the forum and I don't see anything on this topic.
I simply want the sort criteria (from when the user clicks on a column header) to be remembered across multiple uses of the page. I know that the control handles this itself for multiple invocations of the same page (like when you page through the table). But I need to preserve the sort order so I can install it again when someone leaves the page and then returns to it.
I've tried various attempts using a SortListener to record the sort criteria, but I can't figure out how to reinstall the criteria without generating exceptions from the table control.
Any pointers on how to do this would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
Larry.

Ok, I've solved the problems with the odd behavior by always creating a new model when the table data changes and copying the sort criteria into the new model, like this:
        // Construct our own CollectionModel from this result set
        if(_model == null) {
            // Construct the initial data model and set the starting sort criteria
            ListDataModel m = new ListDataModel(results);
            _model = new SortableModel(m);
            // Set the sort criteria to last name
            ArrayList criteria = new ArrayList();
            criteria.add(new SortCriterion("lastName", true));
            _model.setSortCriteria(criteria);
        } else {
            // Construct a new model so the table "sees" the change
            ListDataModel m = new ListDataModel(results);
            SortableModel sm = new SortableModel(m);
            sm.setSortCriteria(_model.getSortCriteria());
            _model = sm;
        }But, I end up with one final thing that doesn't work. In the "then" clause above, I try to set the initial sort criteria for the table - it has no effect. When the table is rendered, it is not sorted in any way.
How can I specify an initial sort order for the table? Why is it ignoring the sort criteria on the model?
Thanks.

Complete Sorting Criteria Hierarchy for songs/episodes/groups with Classic

Ok, I have an idea that I think would help a lot of people. Let us begin a thread that tries to explain, in detail, the sorting filters, in order of priority, that the iPod Classic uses to sort its lists of albums, songs, tv episodes, etc., once you have a list in front of you on the screen. This goes for Cover Flow mode, regular listing, etc.
Here is what I propose. For example, let's start with songs. In iTunes, when you choose to edit the info on a particular song, you can choose which fields to populate. You may or may not enter the year, the track number, the composer, etc. On your iPod, then, if you click on an Album, the songs you see within that album will be listed by +track number, as they were assigned in iTunes+. Track number takes highest precedence in the hierarchy when it comes to sorting songs within an album.
- But, if you go Main Menu->Music->Albums, how are all the albums sorted? Alphabetically by album title? Alphabetically by artist? Is there a way to sort them by year? Would you like the freedom to choose, if Apple provided it?
- How are the compilations sorted into the mix?
- How does applying an "album artist" affect the sorting, as opposed to just applying an "artist?"
- How do songs that are "grouped" together with the same "Grouping" field affect sort lists on the iPod?
- In Cover Flow mode, now with firmware upgrade 1.0.2, what is the sort criteria for albums in Cover Flow? Alphabetically by album title? Alphabetically by artist of the first track on the compilation? Alphabetically by "album artist?" What if no "album artist" has been attributed to a "compilation?"
- What about TV Episodes? Within a particular season, what is the primary determining factor for sorting episodes? Is it alphabetically by title? By release date? Or by episode #? Or by something else?
To some, this may seem tedious or trivial. But there seem to be so many issues flying around right now, and many of them center squarely upon the inability to sync and sort properly. Many people are digitizing a cd library for the first time with the release of the 160 GB iPod Classic, and when you're trying to organize HUNDREDS of songs, albums, compilations, and tv episodes, understanding exactly how the iPod sorts all your precious data is crucial. Knowledge is power, and we want to know.
ANY help you can contribute to any aspect of iPod sorting, no matter how obvious or how technical, would be appreciated by all.

Ok, I have an idea that I think would help a lot of people. Let us begin a thread that tries to explain, in detail, the sorting filters, in order of priority, that the iPod Classic uses to sort its lists of albums, songs, tv episodes, etc., once you have a list in front of you on the screen. This goes for Cover Flow mode, regular listing, etc.
Here is what I propose. For example, let's start with songs. In iTunes, when you choose to edit the info on a particular song, you can choose which fields to populate. You may or may not enter the year, the track number, the composer, etc. On your iPod, then, if you click on an Album, the songs you see within that album will be listed by +track number, as they were assigned in iTunes+. Track number takes highest precedence in the hierarchy when it comes to sorting songs within an album.
- But, if you go Main Menu->Music->Albums, how are all the albums sorted? Alphabetically by album title? Alphabetically by artist? Is there a way to sort them by year? Would you like the freedom to choose, if Apple provided it?
- How are the compilations sorted into the mix?
- How does applying an "album artist" affect the sorting, as opposed to just applying an "artist?"
- How do songs that are "grouped" together with the same "Grouping" field affect sort lists on the iPod?
- In Cover Flow mode, now with firmware upgrade 1.0.2, what is the sort criteria for albums in Cover Flow? Alphabetically by album title? Alphabetically by artist of the first track on the compilation? Alphabetically by "album artist?" What if no "album artist" has been attributed to a "compilation?"
- What about TV Episodes? Within a particular season, what is the primary determining factor for sorting episodes? Is it alphabetically by title? By release date? Or by episode #? Or by something else?
To some, this may seem tedious or trivial. But there seem to be so many issues flying around right now, and many of them center squarely upon the inability to sync and sort properly. Many people are digitizing a cd library for the first time with the release of the 160 GB iPod Classic, and when you're trying to organize HUNDREDS of songs, albums, compilations, and tv episodes, understanding exactly how the iPod sorts all your precious data is crucial. Knowledge is power, and we want to know.
ANY help you can contribute to any aspect of iPod sorting, no matter how obvious or how technical, would be appreciated by all.

A Report who finds WBE in set with a massive sort criteria

Hi,
I'm looking for a Report who finds WBE in sets (Groups) with a massive sort criteria because KJH3 has only a "one by one" sorting criteria.
Thanks
Giovanna

Hi Asam,
If we want to create a parameter depend on another dataset, we can additional create or add the dataset, embedded or shared, that has a query that contains query variables. Then use the option that “Get values from a
query” to get available values. For more details, please see:http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd283107.aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd220464.aspx
As to the Report Builder features, we can refer to the following articles:http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh213578.aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh965699.aspx
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Katherine Xiong
Katherine Xiong
TechNet Community Support

How to Configure Displayed flds,Sort criteria,Grouping crit-Cap Planning

Hi All,
Please let me know
How to Configure Displayed flds,Sort criteria,Grouping crit under Capacity Planning (Profile for List Variant-Sub Profile)
I want to create new Displayed flds,Sort criteria,Grouping crit
Prabakaran K

dear,
use CY40

Photo sorting criteria 9.2.1

I think we have all noticed the change in the photo sorting criteria with the new 9.2.1 version of iTunes.
Before, sorting was alphabetical. Now, it is by "date last changed" of photo.
If you do not have iPhoto, there appears to be no way to change the settings/ criteria for the sequencing of the photos (and hence, slideshow). This is infuriating for clients who are not set up in the "new criteria" format (the photo option on iPod is now practically redundant!).
i.e. it seems that Apple have changed the sort criteria without giving clients any option (other than to buy their software...).
Or am I missing something?

I've had this very same issue and it's making me very upset. I'm looking for an answer to this!

Defining sort criteria using vb6 and CR XI

using vb6 and cr XI and I am trying to provide the user with the capability of defining sort options using options defined on a VB6 form. The sample code I've found as described below doesn't seem to allow me to change the sort criteria by field name
'General Declarations
Dim CRXDatabaseField As CRAXDRT.DatabaseFieldDefinition
Private Sub Form_Load()
Set CRXDatabaseField = CRXReport.Database.Tables.Item(1).Fields.Item(8)
CRXReport.RecordSortFields.Item(1).Field = CRXDatabaseField
I would like the user to select an option to sort by say Client and then provide this information to the report like I could with CR 7 as follows
crReport.SortFields(0) = "+{Horse.Location}"
Thanks for any help
Gerry

Hi Gerry,
Have a look to [Sample codes|https://boc.sdn.sap.com/codesamples] and [Dev Library|https://boc.sdn.sap.com/developer/library]
Hope that helps!!
Regards,
Shweta

Tableview Filter/Sort Always open a new window!

Dear experts,
I have came accross a weird problem. When user filter/sort function in a tableview, a new window always display automatically with the result. But the old page does not change accordingly. But when you use filter/sort function in the new window, it's fine.
I think this may because my old window is a ModalDialog window. It was opened using "
javascript:window.showModalDialog". When using filter/sort function, a real window rather than a dialogue appears with the correct result. But this is not what I wanted. I want to display the filter/sort result in the dialogue window, anything could solve this problem?
Thanks in advance,
Sinvaya

The easiest way to open new windows in Finder, Safari and just about any other program in Mac OS X is to use the keyboard shortcut, 'Command' + 'n'

How to reset the sort criteria on a sortable table?

Hi all,
How can I reset the sort criteria on a sortable table?
Regards

Hi,
Did you try with <af:resetActionListener> or refresh table in Bean using button make sure partialSubmit true for Button and use following code
acesContext adfFacesContext = AdfFacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
adfFacesContext.addPartialTargets(UIForTable);Check following
http://jdevadf.oracle.com/adf-richclient-demo/docs/tagdoc/af_resetActionListener.html
http://www.adftips.com/2010/10/adf-ui-resetting-or-clearing-form.html

Filter/sort approach

we develop intranet application, and on the server side we decided to use CMP entity beans as persistence layer. but we have now some problems how to impement sorting/filtering at client side. for expample you can see a list of cars on page in table with some columns user should have possibility to filter data by one ore more columns filter and also order data by one or more columns. and now i have doubt how to provide this functionality in CMP bean i can't write ejbFind method fort all combinations of criteria and ordering user requested how can this problem be solved reasonably?
to perform filterting and sorting on application level?
to use some proprietary solution? (jboss we use provides dynamic
queries)
or is there any other possibilities???
thanx for any help??
PXP Slovakia s.r.o.
Boris Brinza
IT Developer
Kukuricna 1, 831 03 Bratislava, Slovakia

Hi,
You can avoid multiple database calls by storing the results in a Collection and then use Collections.sort everytime the user wants to reorder the data.
As to where you would keep the collection, it would depend on your architecture. If you had a stateful session bean that was handling the user's requests, that would be a good place. Or you could keep it in the servlet session context (not a good idea if you have a huge collection).
Ta ta,
Jagan.

ADF Unable to filter / sort date column in table

Hi,
I am using JDeveloper 11.1.1.7.
I have a read only table inside a panel collection. One of the columns in the table is a date field. I have filterable and sortable properties set to true for all columns. Filter and sort property works for all columns expect the date column. The filter and sort options is not even shown for the date field (shown below).
<af:column headerText="#{bindings.ASRTCreateRequestVO1.hints.CreationDate.label}"
                                         id="c7" sortable="true" width="100"
                                         filterable="true">
                                <af:outputText value="#{row.CreationDate}"
                                               id="ot7">
                                  <af:convertDateTime pattern="#{bindings.ASRTCreateRequestVO1.hints.CreationDate.format}"/>
                                </af:outputText>
                              </af:column>
Please let me know if I am missing anything here.
Thanks,
Ashwin

Hi Ashwin,
As mentioned by Timo, for me also the filtering is working as usual.
But while browsing through the ADF UI Guide I came across with below note
If you want to use a component other than an inputText component for your filter (for example, an inputDate component), then instead of setting filterVisible to true, you can add the needed component to the filter facet.
To do so:
1. In the Structure window, right-click the column to be filtered and choose Insert inside af:column > JSF Core > Filter facet.
2. From the Component Palette, drag and drop a component into the facet.
3. Set the value of the component to the corresponding attribute within the FilterableQueryDescriptor class created in Step 1(not above step but you can find it in pg:390). Note that the value must take into account the variable used for the row, for example:
#{af:inputDate label="Select Date" id="name" value="row.filterCriteria.date"}.
This is in the section: 12.5.1 How to Add Filtering to a Table(pg:390).
I hope it helps.
Regards,
Peddi.

Sorting criteria not validating in Z Programe development

We are in process of data fatching in a Z development program and faced with following situation;
1. We pass criteria as Fiscal Year 2010 and posting date as 01.04.2010 to 30.04.2010
2. Accourding to above input we fatch data in MSEG table
3. But when passing the MSEG reference field into header table MKPF we find different date (i.e. October 2010) which is different from initial data range (i.e. April 2010)
It seems that we are unable to put date check criteria,
How could we initiate the date check successfully. Kindly suggest.
Regards
Mayoor

Sir ;
we seek your Guidance within Following Criteria :
1.) we r under the process of sorting data having material movement with Financial Impects
2.) how to sort data from the related tables since we have two year's that is Material year and fiscal year.
3.) we desire to sort data specific to particular date range with in one Period
Plz. advice.

Filter vo criteria on page load

i have a requirement where i have to execute a view criteria on a view object when the page is being loaded. page is a master detail page. i have to filter detail view object to display only specific records based on a criteria.
what is the best way to achieve this. i tried using a bean on view BeforePhase which executes a method written on AM, but it is throwing some null pointer exception.

Hi 963798,
in the present taskflow that contains ur page add methodcall as default activity make fixed outcome to ur page, next in method section of method-call (property inspector) bind it to ur managed bean, in managed bean method execute view criteria of your view object, later drag the vo datacontrol on your respective page
in managed bean
urmethod{
oracle.adf.model.BindingContext context = BindingUtils.getBindingContext();
DCBindingContainer bc = (DCBindingContainer)context.getCurrentBindingsEntry();
DCDataControl dc = bc.findDataControl("TestAMDataControl");
ViewObject vo = dc.getApplicationModule().findViewObject("ur VO");
apply ur criteria and execute
example of method-call default activity
http://andrejusb.blogspot.in/2008/10/form-opening-in-find-mode.html
Thanks

Schema filter sorting issue

After connecting to EBS database I filtered "Other users" to see only 2 schemas.
The schemas were sorted alphabetically on both sides, which made it easy to select the ones I needed.
After that I tried to modify the filter and this time Available schemas ar not sorted (at least not by name). Displayed schemas ar still sorted.
There is a workaround, however. Just keep pressing the schema name first letter to cycle through all schemas starting with that letter. Or type in full name to jump to it directly.
Pressing [help] brings up error "Cannot find help content...". Which is understandable. :)
Developer version v1215, Windows 2k.

Another workaround is to use >> to shift all users back to Displayed and then << to shift all back to Available and then they will be alphabetic. That should not be the permanent solution - I did log a bug on this.
-- Sharon

Filter / Sort by Bit Depth? (16 bit vs 8 bit)

I am looking for a way to use the Filter panel to sort/filter results by bit depth (16 bit vs 8 bit images) - is there a way to do this Bridge CS4? I have looked in every part of the sorting mechnisms and can't find a way. Am I missing something?

Unfortunately there is no such way in the filter panel, it might be a good
feature request, maybe you can add that using the link at the main page on
this forum.
In the meantime there are 2 possible workarounds. Regarding the fact that a
16 bit is twice the size of an 8 bit you might want to use the sort by size
criterion in the Path Bar but when having different source files or layered
files that might not always be sufficient.
If you use the find command (cmd+F / or menu Edit-Find) you can select the
find by bit depth option. Also select the option to equal and use either the
number 8 or 16.
I am looking for a way to use the Filter panel to sort/filter results by bit
depth (16 bit vs 8 bit images) - is there a way to do this Bridge CS4? I have
looked in every part of the sorting mechnisms and can't find a way. Am I
missing something?

Filter sort criteria

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for