Financial Statement Item - 0GLACCEXT hierarchy in Query

Hi,
I have loaded the Financial Statement Item hierarchy(0GLACCEXT_T011_HIER ) in to BI from R/3. I have made it as an infoprovider & included it in the multiprovider along with the GL Line items cube (other I/Os are also there). Next what all do I need to do for that to appear in the reports? That hierarchy selection in the query I have done but unable to expand the hierarchy!
Thanks,
Shreesh.

Hello Padel,
Be sure you take care of I_PACKAGESIZE parameter.
If volume of data is less than I_PACKAGESIZE, it's OK. If volume of data is greater than I_PACKAGESIZE, You won't see any data. In this case, your function module has to produce data packets of size I_PACKAGESIZE.
Hope it helps.

Similar Messages

Hierarchy INT does not exist for Financial Statement item 0glaccext

Hi,
I am facing a problem while executing the Standard Business content "Cash Flow statement" query. I am getting the message "Hierarchy INT does not exist for Financial Statement item 0glaccext".
I am not able to find this Hierarchy in the "avaialble Hierarchies from OLTP". I think this is a standard SAP Hierarchy.
Any thoughts on how to resolve this issue

John,
You can define FSVs for a specific chart of accounts, for a group chart of accounts, or without any specific assignment.
In your case, double-check whether you are running the report for the same CoA assignment that you have defined your FSV for in the first place.
As somebody's mentioned earlier, these reports are made using Report Painter (GRR1 / 2 / 3, etc.). Seems FSV = INT has been fixed in these reports for your system. You'll have to edit these reports (using GRR2) and the correct FSV.
Regards
Gulshan

Hierarchy INT for 0GLACCEXT (Financial statement item)

Dear Friends,
I have a situation where i am modifying a standard BC query 0FIGL_VC1_Q0002 and i have to find equivalent nodes (equivalent to the standard SAP INT hierarchy) in my custom hierarchy for 0GLACCEXT (financial statement item). BW has a standard hierarchy INT for 0GLACCEXT (with nodes as numbers for example 3070000, 2030000 etc). With the custom hierarchy in my case how do i find the equivalent hierarchy nodes for this hierarchy while working with this query?
Any help would be highly appreciated.
Thanks
Raj

First of all, U cannot get balance sheet and income statement reports on DSO level... or even at cube level (0FIGL_C10)
Balance sheet and income statement logic is manipulated in function Module (RS_BCT_FIGL_DATA_GET_VC10) that pulls data from 0FIGL_C10 to 0FIGL_V10... Thats the reason why SAP provided all Balance sheet and income statement reports on 0FIGL_V10.. And u can see 0GLACCEXCT in 0FIGL_V10, but not in 0FIGL_C10, which provides income statements at aggregation (totals) level, but not at granular level..
Looks like u r trying for something (keeping 0GLACCEXT in 0FIGL_O10) which is not possible... If u want much detailed level of reports, u can create jump targets (RRI) from 0FIGL_V10 reports to 0FIGL_O10 reports (if u create any)

0GLACCEXT Financial Statement Item infoobject

Hi,
I would like to use General Ledger DSO (0FIGL_O02) for balance sheet and income statement reports by including the financial statement item info object 0GLACCEXT. By including this info object I can use its hierarchical structure to make balance sheet and income statement reports. I can use other SAP delivered virtual providers to run the balance sheet and income statement reports but they don't provide much of drill down capabilities.
So, My question is: how can I map this (0GLACCEXT) info object into this DSO? I mean what is the corresponding field in R/3 or ECC? If I can map and populate this field into this DSO I can the use the hierarchical structure of 0GLACCEXT info object in the reports. Thanks.
Regards,
Rao.

First of all, U cannot get balance sheet and income statement reports on DSO level... or even at cube level (0FIGL_C10)
Balance sheet and income statement logic is manipulated in function Module (RS_BCT_FIGL_DATA_GET_VC10) that pulls data from 0FIGL_C10 to 0FIGL_V10... Thats the reason why SAP provided all Balance sheet and income statement reports on 0FIGL_V10.. And u can see 0GLACCEXCT in 0FIGL_V10, but not in 0FIGL_C10, which provides income statements at aggregation (totals) level, but not at granular level..
Looks like u r trying for something (keeping 0GLACCEXT in 0FIGL_O10) which is not possible... If u want much detailed level of reports, u can create jump targets (RRI) from 0FIGL_V10 reports to 0FIGL_O10 reports (if u create any)

Financial Statement Item Issue

Dear Experts,
I have one Hierarchy of Financial Statement Item where i am trying to pull the hierrachy for the Item 1000, and it is correctly pulled. Now I used that same hierarchy in the query & when i execute the same, the data seems to be in correct. As one of its node is coming under the Not Assigned Node which is a wrong node.
I have searched for SDN Forums also for this but not get the related issue n solution.
What to do please advice.
Thanks
Neha

Hii
Thanks for the reply.
The hierarchy is not Time Dependent. Also the version dependent is not checked in the Hierarchy Tab.
What should be the properties set for this?
How does the version or time dependency effects the hierarchy in Analyser??
Thanks
Neha

Issue with Intervals in Financial Statement Item - Balance Dependency

Dear Experts,
We're experimenting a problem with the Balance Dependency in a hierarchy in the Financial Statement Item object (0GLACCEXT).
We want that the program uses the following conditions:
Assets -> Suppress Balance if Positive (Balance Dependency = 1)
Liabilities -> Suppress Balance if Negative (Balance Dependency = 2)
When we use accounts individually there is no problem.
The problem occurs when we use intervals, the program doesn't make any distinction between Positive or Negative Balance, so all the items appear.
We're counting on your help to solve this problem.
Best Regards,
Rui Romba

Hello,
I have seen this problem in the past and it happened because the IDOC transfer method was used instead of PSA transfer method.
According to the attached note 663945 for loading 0GLACCEXT_T011_HIER hierarchies the transfer method PSA
should be used. Please change the transfer rules settings accordingly if this applies to your scenario. Note 663945 also explains how to set correct field mappings.
Kind Regards,
Des

Relationship between FINANCIAL STATEMENT ITEM and GL ACCOUNT NUMBER

hii experts...
can anyone tell me the relationship between FINANCIAL STATEMENT ITEM (FIELD NAME: ERGSL) and GL ACCOUNT number corresponding to that FSV..
and if these fields are present in any table... den please do tell...
thanks in advance.

Thanks Raymond for giving me suggestion...
bt wat actually is my problem na...
i m creating a balance sheet in BAPI and in this I need FSV and GL account number...
i got everyting bt i cant find the realtionship between these two fields...
hope u understand my problem..

Maintaining financial statement items

What is the TCode for Maintaining financial statement items ?
Markus

Hi,
Why the financial statement (OB58) BAPT included the old and new alternative account, don't displayed the splited value?
exemple :
2009 622800 60,00u20AC account
2010 622230 40,00u20AC account
all standard reports based on financial statement BAPT, display the total value (100,00u20AC) on the last alternative account (622230 ) and not the splited value.
Thank you for your feed back.
Rgds
Francoise

Unwanted financial statement items coming in FSV

Hello Group,
I have created one FSV thru OB58 for only assets and liabilities accounts.
When I ran this FSV thru report S_ALR_87012284-Financial Statements, I found that some profit and loss accounts are also displayed in report.
Also I got problem after I ran FAGL_FC_TRANS - Closing -> Valuate -> Currency Translation of Balances as system has translated P&L accounts also which I do not want.
I have further investigated and created one TEST FSV without assigning any financial statement items. When I ran it in the report, this has also displayed same P&L accounts.
Can any body give some suggestions?
Thanks in advance,
Kedar.

Hi
Standard SAP Setup will consider the following.
Since at any point of time the financial statement should tally. So, all assigned GL accounts will be appearing under respective nodes and un assigned GL accounts will appear under a separate node making the trial balance as Zero. This is standard and this is how it has to be.
If the unassigned GL accounts balances are Zero and you dont require to show in the output you can further filter it out in the input screen of F.01
EnjoySAP
Natesh

Link between Financial Statement Item and Break-Down-Category

Dear all,
we try to create an own data entry functionality in SAPNetweaver for our BCS Data.
Therefore we need to implement a coding vor a validation (IP-coding). Do you know in which table we get the link between the financial statement item and the break-down category?
The customizing phath is
TA UCWB > Master Data > Items > Item (select item) > Field Breakdown Category (field name: ITGRP).
We need the tecnical link (table/structure) so that we can create a validation based on the financial statement and the breakdown category).
Thanks!
XmchX

The tables themselves are generated objects that are structured based on how you've defined your master data (custom attributes, etc).
You can probably find them through table UGMD2011 and entering the fieldname of your FS Item (I think the delivered item is /1FB/CS_ITEM).
The following snippet is from a function module I wrote to check movement type restrictions (min/max selection set) might be useful. I've previously created a custom task for posting custom documents (that could not be defined with standard reclassifications or IU eliminations).
I've never worked with the portal, but presumably you can create an RFC interface and replicate the selections which normally come from the cons monitor (Cons Area, GC, FYV, Period, Year, Cons Chart, + and additional fields fixed in the cons area) on a portal page and inherit them that way. I actually thought about creating an Excel workbook that would send postings directly into BCS...just never got the time, and it was never a "requirement" as the volume of manually entries has been pretty low (or, at least always planned to be low)
CONSTANTS:
c_area            TYPE uc_area      VALUE 'US',              " Consolidation Area
c_chart           type uc_value     value 'US',              " Chart of Accounts
c_item_fieldname TYPE uc_fieldname VALUE '/1FB/CS_ITEM',    " FS Item Fieldname
c_chart_fieldname TYPE uc_fieldname VALUE '/1FB/CS_CHART',   " Chart of Accounts Fieldname
c_mt_fieldname    TYPE uc_fieldname VALUE '/1FB/MOVE_TYPE'. " Movement Type Fieldname
TYPES:
" Item attributes required from BCS databasis
BEGIN OF s_item,
    /1fb/cs_chart TYPE /bi0/oics_chart,
    /1fb/cs_item TYPE /bi0/oics_item,
    txtmi TYPE uc_txtmi,
    itgrp TYPE uc_itgrp,
    itgrp_max_set TYPE uc_itgrp_max_set,
END OF s_item,
t_item TYPE HASHED TABLE OF s_item WITH UNIQUE KEY /1fb/cs_chart /bic/bcs_litem,
" Breakdown Category attributes required from BCS databasis
BEGIN OF s_itgrp,
    itgrp TYPE uc_itgrp,
    selid_max TYPE uc_selid,
    txtmi TYPE uc_txtmi,
END OF s_itgrp,
t_itgrp TYPE HASHED TABLE OF s_itgrp WITH UNIQUE KEY itgrp,
" Movement Type and Description
BEGIN OF s_mt_txt,
    move_type TYPE /bi0/oimove_type,
    txtsh TYPE uc_txtsh,
END OF s_mt_txt,
t_mt_txt TYPE HASHED TABLE OF s_mt_txt WITH UNIQUE KEY move_type.
DATA:
" BCS Interfaces
do_factory        TYPE REF TO if_ug_md_factory,
do_char           TYPE REF TO if_ug_md_char,
do_value          TYPE REF TO if_ug_md_char_value,
do_area           TYPE REF TO if_uc_area,
do_model          TYPE REF TO if_uc_model,
do_context        TYPE REF TO if_uc_context,
do_char_itgrp     TYPE REF TO if_ug_md_char,
lt_field_val      TYPE ugmd_ts_field_val,
ls_field_val      TYPE ugmd_s_field_val,
lt_value          TYPE uc0_ts_value,
ls_value          TYPE uc0_s_value,
lt_itgrp          TYPE t_itgrp,
ls_itgrp          TYPE s_itgrp,
" Lookup tables
lt_sel            TYPE ugmd_ts_sel,
ls_sel            TYPE ugmd_s_sel,
lt_fieldname      TYPE ugmd_ts_fieldname,
ls_fieldname      TYPE fieldname,
ls_item           TYPE s_item,
ls_item2          TYPE s_item,
lt_item           TYPE t_item,
lt_mt_txt         TYPE t_mt_txt,
ls_mt_txt         TYPE s_mt_txt,
l_tabname         TYPE tabname,
l_itgrp           TYPE uc_itgrp,
" Output tables
lt_lookup_bdc     TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF zsbcs_movement_type_lookup_bdc,
lt_lookup         TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF zsbcs_movement_type_lookup,
ls_lookup_bdc     TYPE zsbcs_movement_type_lookup_bdc,
ls_lookup         TYPE zsbcs_movement_type_lookup.
" Initialize BCS interfaces
IF do_area IS INITIAL.
    CALL METHOD cl_uc_area=>if_uc_area~get_area_instance
      EXPORTING
        i_area = c_area
      IMPORTING
        eo_area = do_area.
ENDIF.
IF do_model IS INITIAL.
    CALL METHOD do_area->get_model
      IMPORTING
        eo_model = do_model.
ENDIF.
IF do_factory IS NOT BOUND.
    CALL METHOD cl_uc_area=>if_uc_area~get_md_factory
      EXPORTING
        i_area        = c_area
      IMPORTING
        eo_md_factory = do_factory.
ENDIF.
" Create reference to FS Item characteristic
do_char = do_factory->get_char_instance(
      i_fieldname = c_item_fieldname ).
" Define restrictions on FS Item for reading values
" Always filter on chart of accounts
ls_sel-fieldname = c_chart_fieldname.
ls_sel-sign      = uc00_cs_ra-sign_i.
ls_sel-option    = uc00_cs_ra-option_eq.
ls_sel-low       = c_chart.
INSERT ls_sel INTO TABLE lt_sel.
" filter on FS Item if provided as input parameter
IF NOT i_item IS INITIAL.
    ls_sel-fieldname = c_item_fieldname.
    ls_sel-sign      = uc00_cs_ra-sign_i.
    ls_sel-option    = uc00_cs_ra-option_eq.
    ls_sel-low       = i_item.
    INSERT ls_sel INTO TABLE lt_sel.
ENDIF.
" Get FS Item values
CALL METHOD do_char->read_value
    EXPORTING
      it_sel   = lt_sel
    IMPORTING
      et_value = lt_item.
" Exit if invalid item was passed as parameter
if lines( lt_item ) = 0.
    raise no_data.
endif.
" Additional logic for next finding ITGRP details, etc.........
Would recommend debugging these two methods to get an idea of what BCS is doing:
cl_uc_tx_data_change->if_uc_tx_data_change~analyze_and_add_data
cl_uc_tx_data_change->save_data
Anyway, hope that helps. It took me a lot of debugging to figure out exactly which objects were being used by the posting process, getting the refresh right (delete/reverse existing documents based on special version customizing), etc. I wouldn't recommend slamming them into the cube and ODS directly with a RSDRI_CUBE_WRITE_PACKAGE or anything...
- Chris

How to setup FS Items for debit and credit only Financial Statement Items

Hi,
In Financial Statement, there are line items that report for the same accounts that are debit only under Assets and credit only under Liabilities. How should I setup Consolidation Chart of Accounts/FS Items in EC-CS for such items?
Regards,
B Lim

Hi Prem,
We have already assigned all the co-codes to only 1 COA.
However, we did not create any Group COA and has no intention to.
My issue is this:
As you are aware in the Financial Statement, we are able to maintain for GL accounts to be reported under Assets by specifying the DR indicator and for the same accounts to be reported under Liabilities by specifying the CR Indicator.
When I maintain the Consoliated COA in the Consolidation module (tcode CX16), I have problem with these accounts. How do I create the FS Items such that DRs goes to Assets lines and CRs goes to Liabilities?
Regards,
Bernard

Financial Statement Item Hierarchy 0GLACCEXT Problem

Hi Guys,
I have loaded the hierarchy from R/3 to BW. Activated and change run done.
These hierarchy nodes are nothing but G/L. When I am running the report, all nodes are not displayed only few are displayed. Those nodes are present in system.
Please help me to resolve this issue.
Regards
DJ
P.S. Point will be rewarded for helpful answers.
Edited by: DJ on Jun 28, 2010 8:21 PM
Edited by: DJ on Jun 28, 2010 8:22 PM

Hi,
As you have explained the issue:
a) in the AWB all nodes are available
b) posting in the nodes have occurred but some are showing zeroes (probably due to some postings that have occurred but are summed to zero)
c) all values for the hierarchy don't show up in the query.
if this is the correct situation then go into the query designer, to the characteristics that you have the hierarchy assigned - then use the properties, ADVANCED, Access type for result values - chose MASTER DATA. then execute your report - you should see that all of the nodes are displayed - now, if you are in the web you may need to go to the characteristic properties within the report and then turn OFF the property on the HIERARCHY tab - show only posted values. this is defaulted to be ON. if you are working within the BEX Analyzer you may have to go into the query and make sure that the same property is set in the PROPERTIES option and on the TAB > GENERAL.
Hope this helps, Pete

Financial Statement Version vs item

HI Pros
what is the diff between
Financial Statement Version 0GL_FSVERSN
versus
Financial Statement item 0GLACCEXT
kris

no responce

0GLACCEXT hierarchy nodes description ( text ) not displaying

Hi Gurus,
I have uploaded 0GLACCEXT hierarchy from ECC system in to BI 7.0. I can only see the hierarchy nodes in the RSH1 and in the reports as well for 0GLACCEXT.But I am not able to see the hierarchy nodes description like under Expenses > salaries , wages , housing etc .....only its GL accounts is displaying like 700100 , 700200
I also uploaded Text datasource ( 0GL_ACCOUNT_TEXT ) for 0GLACCEXT , the text is loading without any problem but the changes are not being reflected in the RSH1 and the reports.
Regards,
-Neha

Hi KP,
Thanks for your reply , the text for 0GL_ACCOUNT is displaying fine , I don't have any issues with 0GL_ACCOUNT , my main concern is I'm using Financial Statement item 0GLACCEXT for Balance Sheet and P&L Statement (for period accounting) by using Virtual Cube 0FIGL_VC1 the Text is not displaying in the reports as well as in RSH1 , where as for 0GL_ACCOUNT the hierarchies and text are working and displaying fine.
I'm closing this thread , the problem has been solved
it was related to mappings in Transfer rules.
Regards,
-Neha
Edited by: Nehabibo on Dec 18, 2010 11:46 AM
Edited by: Nehabibo on Dec 18, 2010 11:47 AM

Financial statement of non R/3 companies

Hello everybody;
We have non R/3 companies and we need to make a consolidated balance for them, so we were forced to create the 0GLACCEXT hierarchy manually instead of using data source 0GLACCEXT_T011_HIER in order to create their financial statements.
Depending on whether the balance of the financial statement items is positive or negative, the item must be placed on the assets or liabilities side of the financial statement.
Our problem is that when we execute the query 0FIGL_VC1_Q0001 no distinction appears between assets or liabilities, and financial statement item appears (accounts number) in both sides.
Can anybody help us?
Thank you.
Mariana Serrano

Hi Mariana,
It means that you built a hierarchy incorrectly.
Do you mean that the same account appears on both sides?
Or there is no distinguish between assets and liabilities at all?
Best regards,
Eugene

Financial Statement Item - 0GLACCEXT hierarchy in Query

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for