Finder date and Iphoto date are very different in some photos

Question

I run Iphoto 9.6 on OSX Yosemite 10.10.1 with an Imac 27" of mid 2010.
Some photos have wrong date in Iphoto while the right creation date of these photos are in the finder (exif dates are always correct).
Because, i have more than four thousand pictures with wrong dates, is there a way to fix that issue easily (by a script or a utility ?). I discover when there is a difference between those two dates, it's always a difference of + 6066 days and 11 hours ??? Like that, some photos appears to be done in 2045 ???
Some body came help me ?
Many thanks in avance,

Answer 1

Poelger,
thanks for your interest, please let me explain it better.
I have 2 data blocks. The 1st one is a single record, non-database block, where I input some parameters, and one of these parameters is a date field. This date field will be passed via PL/SQL inside the form to compose the search criteria.
:BLK_PARAMETER.date_field receives 02/02/2009 as typed by the user, being configured as a field which receives data in date format (dd/mm/yyyy). This date is used inside a form procedure called PRC_SEARCH_CRITERIA, which mounts a variable called p_where. Please consider the code below belongs to PRC_SEARCH_CRITERIA.
p_where := 'trunc (date_field) = ''' || :BLK_PARAMETER.date_field || '''';
set_block_property ('BLOCK_BEING_QUERIED', default_where, p_where);
I ran it on Oracle Debugger and I saw p_where being mounted as:
trunc (date_field) = '02-FEB-09'
And, when my form executes an execute_query instruction, it raises FRM-40505 error. I copied this p_where value and tried to run it in Oracle SQL Developer, where the error was the same. When I edited it on SQL Developer, changing this date to '02-FEV-09' (since "february" in english is "fevereiro" in portuguese), my query ran finely. So it seems to me that Oracle Forms and database aren't configured to use the same date format, maybe they're using different language date formats.
I need to understand this behavior and act so this should not happen again; now I solved this problem in other ways, but 1st of all I would like to understand it better, so I won't repeat it. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Best regards,
Franklin