Firewall Load Balance using bridged mode ACE

Dear Folks,
I 'd like to load balance 2 ASA using 3 ACE [ Inside,outside,dmz network zone]
I 've seen sample configuration, all of them are running the ACE in the route mode, and asa are running in route mode
Would it be possible to run the ACE in the bridge Mode, because the ip subneted problem, We don't have enough to split,,
by the way if possible,All server that install behind ACE, what is default gateway should Server Point to [ in our case we have 2 independent firewall ] should I create the VIP for both firewall ? or should I just simply set the server's gateway to BVI interface, ?
Please Help Thanks

Thank you very much Gilles,
You 're the man. ;-)
Another question in my case I try to load balance 3 interface firewall [inside,outside,dmz] in order to make the packet return the same firewall it has passed earlier,
What kind of hashing technique do I need to use and Do i need to use mac sticky command ???
I tried to find some configuration sample from cisco website , but i only found with only 2 interface with ACE running source hash and destination hash in each ends,
Thank you very much

Similar Messages

  • Cisco ACE - Firewall load balancing

    I am using two sets of ACE load balancers for load balancing traffic across two firewalls (firewall load balancing).
    The solution works fine. I have a virtual address of 0.0.0.0 in either direction to match traffci going from the internal users to the internet and vice versa.
    The problem is that when I try to manage the load-balanced firewalls (either using SSH (or) HTTPS) from outside, then that connection also gets load balanced and when I try to connect to FW1 then sometimes this connection ends up on FW2 and vice versa and the connection gets dropped. I have a workaround in place where i am using a virtual address per firewall to connect to the real IP address of the firewall.
    Is there any other way of managing firewalls (which are defined as real-servers) in a FWLB setup.
    Attached is the configuration of the external ACE which has the two firewalls defined as the real-servers.
    access-list ALL line 8 extended permit ip any any
    probe icmp ICMP-Probe
      interval 15
      passdetect interval 60
    rserver host FW1-ASA
      ip address 10.11.71.10
      inservice
    rserver host FW2
      ip address 10.11.71.11
      inservice
    serverfarm host Firewalls
      transparent
      predictor leastconns
      rserver FW1-ASA
        inservice
      rserver FW2
        inservice
    serverfarm host Firewalls-NO-LB
      rserver FW1-ASA
        inservice
    serverfarm host Firewalls-NO-LB1
      rserver FW2
        inservice
    sticky ip-netmask 255.255.255.255 address source new-sticky
      timeout activeconns
      serverfarm Firewalls
    This is my workaround for connection to the IP address of the firewalls (for management)
    class-map match-any FW-Real
      2 match virtual-address 10.11.71.254 any
    class-map match-any FW-Real2
      2 match virtual-address 10.11.71.253 any
    class-map type management match-any Remote-Access
      201 match protocol telnet any
      202 match protocol http any
      203 match protocol https any
      204 match protocol ssh any
      205 match protocol snmp any
      206 match protocol icmp any
    class-map match-any fwlb
      2 match virtual-address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 any
    policy-map type management first-match Remote-Management-Policy
      class Remote-Access
        permit
    policy-map type loadbalance first-match FWLB-No-LB
      class class-default
        serverfarm Firewalls-NO-LB
    policy-map type loadbalance first-match FWLB-No-LB1
      class class-default
        serverfarm Firewalls-NO-LB1
    policy-map type loadbalance first-match FWLB-l7slb
      class class-default
        serverfarm Firewalls
    policy-map multi-match Firewall-No-LB
      class FW-Real
        loadbalance vip inservice
        loadbalance policy FWLB-No-LB
    policy-map multi-match Firewall-No-LB1
      class FW-Real2
        loadbalance vip inservice
        loadbalance policy FWLB-No-LB1
    policy-map multi-match int70
      class fwlb
        loadbalance vip inservice
        loadbalance policy FWLB-l7slb
    interface vlan 70
      description "Client side"
      ip address 10.11.70.2 255.255.255.0
      no icmp-guard
      access-group input ALL
      access-group output ALL
      service-policy input Remote-Management-Policy
      service-policy input Firewall-No-LB --> connect to the real IP address of the firewall for management
      service-policy input Firewall-No-LB1  --> connect to the real IP address of the firewall for management
      service-policy input int70
      no shutdown
    interface vlan 71
      description "Firewall side"
      ip address 10.11.71.2 255.255.255.0
      mac-sticky enable
      no icmp-guard
      access-group input ALL
      access-group output ALL
      service-policy input Remote-Management-Policy
      no shutdown

    Hello,
    as i know, there is no others ways.
    You can only reduce your configuration by puting all your class undert the same policy-map:
    policy-map multi-match int70
      class FW-Real
        loadbalance vip inservice
        loadbalance policy FWLB-No-LB
      class FW-Real2
        loadbalance vip inservice
        loadbalance policy FWLB-No-LB1
      class fwlb
        loadbalance vip inservice
        loadbalance policy FWLB-l7slb
    interface vlan 70
      description "Client side"
      ip address 10.11.70.2 255.255.255.0
      no icmp-guard
      access-group input ALL
      access-group output ALL
      service-policy input Remote-Management-Policy
      service-policy input int70
      no shutdown

  • How can ftp service on non-standard port be load balanced using Cisco ACE.

    How can ftp service on non-standard port be load balanced using Cisco ACE.For example ftp service required on tcp 2000 port

    Hi Samarjit,
    you can do this by specifying the port number in the class map that you create . Please find the below mentioend config guide where you can specify the tcp/udp port , range or ports or even the wild card to match the port.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/services_modules/ace/v3.00_A1/configuration/administration/guide/mapolcy.html#wp1318826
    Regards
    Abijith

  • Load balancing using   Hardware/Webcache??

    Hi ,
    I am using iAS 10.1.2.02.Please share some best practices of Failover and Load balancing using hardware or Oracle web cache?
    Also what is most recommended by Oracle.
    Regards,
    Noman

    Hi ,
    I am using iAS 10.1.2.02.Please share some best practices of Failover and Load balancing using hardware or Oracle web cache?
    Also what is most recommended by Oracle.
    Regards,
    Noman

  • FTP Load-Balancing in DSR mode

    Hello Experts .. 
    Need some clarity on FTP LB under DSR mode ....  I have my DSR working fine for normal http traffic , but facing issues with FTP on the same , please find the configs attached below 
    Topology 
    Client ( 10.20.10.101)   -----> CAT6k  ( 10.20.10.110 & 10.10.15.2)  --> ACE --- > Server 
    VLAN 149                                  VLAN 149 & VLAN 150
    access-list access line 8 extended permit icmp any any
    access-list access line 16 extended permit tcp any any
    access-list acl line 8 extended permit ip any any
    rserver host real2
      ip address 10.10.15.101
      inservice
    serverfarm host ftp
      transparent
      rserver real2
        inservice
    class-map match-all ftp-vip
      2 match virtual-address 192.168.5.5 tcp eq ftp
    class-map match-any ftp_1
      2 match access-list access
    policy-map type management first-match mgmt
      class class-default
        permit
    policy-map type loadbalance first-match ftp
      class class-default
        serverfarm ftp
    policy-map multi-match LBPOL
      class vip
        loadbalance vip inservice
        loadbalance policy lbpol
        loadbalance vip icmp-reply active
      class ftp-vip
        loadbalance vip inservice
        loadbalance policy ftp
        inspect ftp
      class ftp_1
        nat dynamic 5 vlan 150
    interface vlan 61
      ip address 61.202.200.200 255.0.0.0
      access-group input acl
      service-policy input mgmt
      no shutdown
    interface vlan 150
      description server-side
      ip address 10.10.15.1 255.255.255.0
      no normalization
      access-group input acl
      nat-pool 5 10.10.15.209 10.10.15.209 netmask 255.255.255.255 pat
      service-policy input LBPOL
      service-policy input mgmt
      no shutdown
    ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.15.2
    Client
    ======
    root@TLS_SRV ~]# ifconfig eth1.149
    eth1.149  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1C:23:E2:50:C4
              inet addr:10.20.10.101  Bcast:10.20.10.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
              inet6 addr: fe80::21c:23ff:fee2:50c4/64 Scope:Link
              UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
              RX packets:203 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
              TX packets:68 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
              collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
              RX bytes:10444 (10.1 KiB)  TX bytes:8408 (8.2 KiB)
    route
     192.168.5.0     10.20.10.110    255.255.255.0   UG    0      0        0 eth1.149
    CAT6k
    =======
    interface Vlan149
     ip address 10.20.10.110 255.255.255.0
    end
    interface Vlan150
     ip address 10.10.15.2 255.255.255.0
    end
    ip route 192.168.5.5 255.255.255.255 10.10.15.1    
    Server
    =======
    eth1.150  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1C:23:E2:50:C4
              inet addr:10.10.15.101  Bcast:10.10.15.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
              inet6 addr: fe80::21c:23ff:fee2:50c4/64 Scope:Link
              UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
              RX packets:9194 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
              TX packets:408 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
              collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
              RX bytes:503104 (491.3 KiB)  TX bytes:71884 (70.1 KiB)
    eth1.150:1 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1C:23:E2:50:C4
              inet addr:192.168.5.5  Bcast:192.168.5.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
              UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
    route
    10.20.0.0       10.10.15.2      255.255.0.0     UG    0      0        0 eth1.150
    When i do FTP from client 10.20.10.101 , my connection is getting refused.... But when i connect to my server directly bypassing ACE i am getting authenticated .. 
    As per the DSR , i made  Rserver & ACE as L2 Adjacent  , so when ACE receives the packet it will change the dest ip instead it will use VIP ip as destination , but the MAC will be rewritten to Rserver MAC address... As i said before all works fine for http DSR ... 
    I know NAT doesn't work in ACE when its configured under DSR , but for FTP i made NAT config , but even if i remove the same its not working , Is my config for FTP is correct ? 
    Could some please look into this and reply ? 
    Thanks
    Charles

    if you need to route / provide load balancing between 2 hosts, then you will need to have Route SAF . you can use web server 7 reverse proxy cli or gui to get this. however, you might want to start from a fresh configuration to avoid reverse-map / map that you have experimented with does not overlap with the 'Route' functionality that you seem to need here
    here are some reference content
    http://blogs.sun.com/amit/entry/setting_up_a_reverse_proxy
    http://blogs.sun.com/meena/entry/configuring_reverse_proxy_in_sun
    http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/features/articles/web_server_zones.jsp

  • IDSM-2 load balancing on inline mode is it possible ..?

    Hi there .. I am currenty working on a project and need to find out as to whether etherchanelling load balancing can be configured between several IDSM-2 running on inline mode. The IPS 5.1 admin guide states that it is possible for IOS based switches having the IDSM-2 configured on promiscuous mode, however I have heard that it might also be possible to configure etherchannelling load balance when the IDSM-2 are on inline mode. Any help .. commments will be appreciated .. any links to refer to will be even better
    Thanks !!!

    To configure EtherChannel load balancing on IDSM-2, you must install Cisco IOS 12.2(18)SXE and have Supervisor Engine 720. Cisco IOS only supports promiscuous IDSM-2 EtherChanneling using VACL capture (not SPAN or monitor). Refer the URL
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps4077/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008055df92.html#wp1044800

  • Load balancing UDP application in ACE

    Hi all,
    What's the proper way to load balance a UDP application (NTP protocol) using ACE? We used to do it in our CSS using a content to load-balance and a source group to source-NAT the UDP replies from the servers to the VIP. I guess this should be implemented using NAT in the ACE, but I can't find any example.
    According to the manual, src-natting to VIPs is supported only in A1(8) and it is supposed to be used "when there is a limited number of real-world IP addresses on the client-side network".
    This is not our case, we just need to ensure that the client receives the UDP replies as coming from the VIP, not from real IP address of the server. This is not a problem in TCP-based applications, because the NAT from the rserver IP to the VIP is automatic. What is the proper way to obtain this behaviour for UDP applications? Thanks a lot!
    Regards,
    Pedro

    Pedro,
    reverse nating is not required in ACE world.
    This is done automatically.
    So, the server response will be automatically nated to the vip address when going back to the client.
    If you have an appliance and are just deploying now, I would recommend version A3(2.1).
    If you have a module go for A2(1.3).
    Gilles

  • R1213 Load Balance using F5 load balancers on Sun/Linux

    Hi,
    We got below requirement to perform upgrade and applications Load Balance
    1. Web and Courion services using F5 Load Balancers after R1213 Upgrade.
    Any Idea bout Courion services and how we can perform Load Balance for its services on Apps R1213
    The load balancers would be configured for sticky sessions for consistency.
    2. How we can achive Load Balanced applications to SSL off-loading method.
    3. What is the best methods and any whitepapers to achive the same.
    Please let me know.
    Thanks,
    Bhargava

    Any Idea bout Courion services and how we can perform Load Balance for its services on Apps R1213
    The load balancers would be configured for sticky sessions for consistency.Please elaborate more on this.
    2. How we can achive Load Balanced applications to SSL off-loading method.How To Redirect HTTP Traffic to HTTPS On A BIG-IP F5 Load Balancer [ID 889308.1]
    3. What is the best methods and any whitepapers to achive the same.How To Check Session Persistence On BigIP F5, Cisco Ace, Citrix Netscaler or Radware AppDirector Load Balancer Appliances [ID 601694.1]
    Tips and Queries for Troubleshooting Advanced Topologies [ID 364439.1]
    You can find also more details in Steven Chan's Blog (search for load balancer) -- http://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • CSM - Load balance using Server CPU

    Hi
    I have a customer who requires the load-balancing prediction
    algorithm to be based on the CPU level of the Server. So the server with the least CPU is chosen at the laod-balancing stage.
    Is there a way to do this?
    Thanks James

    Hi James
    With CSM the only option is DFP (Dynamic feed back protocol). If your application vendor provides DFP agents (which is very unlikely) for the application then these agents can be installed on App servers for the desired purpose.
    Config details at
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/services_modules/csm/4.2.x/configuration/guide/rsfarms.html#wp1039774')">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/services_modules/csm/4.2.x/configuration/guide/rsfarms.html#wp1039774
    With ACE you can use SNMP based probes to achieve what you are looking for.
    Syed Iftekhar Ahmed

  • Adding a 2nd WFE to a Production Farm - Load balanced using F5 Virtual IPs

    Hello all,
    In much reading I haven't been able to find a more or less straight answer to this question:  I have a small-ish SharePoint farm; 1 WFE, 1 App and a SQL cluster.  I need to bring a 2nd web front end into the farm.  What I am trying to find
    out is, may I install the SharePoint bits and join the new web front end to the farm - without putting the web apps' IPs into my F5 pools - without adversely impacting the farm?  
    What I'm after is time to test the new web front end by redirecting my browser to it via my hosts file.  Once I'm confident all is well, I would then configure WFE2 to have traffic forwarded to it through the F5.  Is this a reasonable hope?
    Thanks in advance for any advice you might provide

    Yes, that will work.
    Having an extra WFE that isn't included in your load balancer is actually a fairly common practice when you use it as a dedicated crawl target, there' no impact to having it there unused for a while.
    Thanks very much for confirming; I appreciate that! 

  • Load balancing using GLBP

    Dear All,
    I need to built a scenario where i am using two ISP's for redundancy for my internal network and at the same time wants to load balance in such a way that my first packet going outside the network (using NAT) goes from first ISP's public ip address and second packet going outside the network (using NAT) goes from second ISP's public ip address.
    Need your help
    Thank You

    Hello
    I tried to lab this up - I managed to use a first hop protocol (hrsp) to a redundant HRSP & NAT configuration - however I have tried GLBP and at present not been successful in getting it to work-
    Here is what I got with HRSP:
          --- R2
    r1 -----        internet host 100.100.100.100
         ---- R3
    R2
    interface FastEthernet0/0
    Description Link to LAN
     ip address 10.1.123.252 255.255.255.0
     ip nat inside
     standby 123 ip 10.1.123.254
     standby 123 priority 115
     standby 123 preempt
     standby 123 name HRSP1
     standby 123 track FastEthernet0/1 50
    interface FastEthernet0/1
    Description Link to ISP1
     ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
     ip nat outside
     standby 234 ip 1.1.1.254
     standby 234 priority 115
     standby 234 preempt
     standby 234 name HRSP2
     standby 234 track FastEthernet0/0 50
    ip route 100.100.100.100 255.255.255.255 FastEthernet0/1 1.1.1.4
    ip nat inside source static 10.1.123.251 1.1.1.1 redundancy HRSP1
    R3
    interface FastEthernet0/0
    Description Link to LAN
     ip address 10.1.123.253 255.255.255.0
     ip nat inside
     standby 123 ip 10.1.123.254
     standby 123 preempt
     standby 123 name HRSP1
     standby 123 track FastEthernet0/0
    interface FastEthernet0/1
    Description Link to ISP2
     ip address 1.1.1.3 255.255.255.0
     ip nat outside
     standby 234 ip 1.1.1.254
     standby 234 preempt
     standby 234 name HRSP2
     standby 234 track FastEthernet0/1 50
    ip route 100.100.100.100 255.255.255.255 FastEthernet0/1 1.1.1.4
    ip nat inside source static 10.1.123.251 1.1.1.1 redundancy HRSP1
    R2#sh ip nat translations
    Pro Inside global      Inside local       Outside local      Outside global
    icmp 1.1.1.1:7         10.1.123.251:7     100.100.100.100:7  100.100.100.100:7
    icmp 1.1.1.1:12        10.1.123.251:12    100.100.100.100:12 100.100.100.100:12
    --- 1.1.1.1            10.1.123.251       ---                ---
    R2#sh standby brief
    Interface   Grp  Pri P State   Active          Standby         Virtual IP
    Fa0/0       123  115 P Active  local           10.1.123.253    10.1.123.254
    Fa0/1       234  115 P Active  local           1.1.1.3         1.1.1.254
    R3#sh stan brief
    Interface   Grp  Pri P State   Active          Standby         Virtual IP
    Fa0/0       123  100 P Standby 10.1.123.252    local           10.1.123.254
    Fa0/1       234  100 P Standby 1.1.1.2         local           1.1.1.254
    R3#sh ip nat translations
    Pro Inside global      Inside local       Outside local      Outside global
    --- 1.1.1.1            10.1.123.251       ---                --
    R2
    int fa0/1
    shut
    R2#sh standby brief
    Interface   Grp  Pri P State   Active          Standby         Virtual IP
    Fa0/0       123  65  P Standby 10.1.123.253    local           10.1.123.254
    Fa0/1       234  115 P Init    unknown         unknown         1.1.1.254
    R2#sh ip nat translations
    Pro Inside global      Inside local       Outside local      Outside global
    --- 1.1.1.1            10.1.123.251       ---                ---
    3#sh stan brief
                         |
    Interface   Grp  Pri P State   Active          Standby         Virtual IP
    Fa0/0       123  100 P Active  local           10.1.123.252    10.1.123.254
    Fa0/1       234  100 P Active  local           unknown         1.1.1.254
    R3#sh ip nat translations
    Pro Inside global      Inside local       Outside local      Outside global
    icmp 1.1.1.1:7         10.1.123.251:7     100.100.100.100:7  100.100.100.100:7
    icmp 1.1.1.1:12        10.1.123.251:12    100.100.100.100:12 100.100.100.100:12
    --- 1.1.1.1            10.1.123.251       ---                ---
    res
    Paul

  • Load balancing using multiple default routes

    Hi Guys,
    I just want to ask does creating multiple default routes on my router provides load-balancing on my WAN side? As far as i know, for example if I have two default routes on my router and let say I have two users connecting to the internet, the first one might go to the first WAN link while the second user might go to the second WAN link.
    Thank you so much
    Rex

    there are the difference between, load balancing and load sharing..which we need to understand.
    load sharing means you have 2 users, user A and User B, user A wants to use ISP1 and user B wants to use ISP2. this is called load sharing. and can be achieved via PBR (Policy based routing).
    we should not try to use load balancing for Internet traffic with 2 different ISPs.

  • Load-balancing using ServerIrons or NetApp Netcaches

              Dear all,
              From a cursory search, this one has been asked loads of times, but I can't find
              an answer....
              We're adding a Weblogic cluster into a resilient environment which has Netcache
              boxes doing reverse proxy and content caching, and Foundry ServerIrons doing the
              load-balancing. We could add in a pair of Apache servers load-balanced by the
              serverIrons and a pair of weblogic boxes in a cluster. However, this is not only
              a bit of overkill, but also adds quite a bit of latency to requests. We also
              already have the Netcache boxes. So, we want to get rid of Apache, and use a
              proposed 3 tier environment:
              Netcache
              |
              | (possibly via a serverIron)
              v
              Weblogic Cluster
              |
              |
              v
              Oracle
              Will this work? Does anyone have any experience extracting the session ID on
              a serverIron (or even on a netcache itself)? Has anyone found a way of doing
              session failover using a serverIron?
              Words of wisdom are needed for a flagging technical consultant...
              Thanks
              Simon Redding
              Technical Specialist
              Environment Agency
              

    Good day Simon,
              We have the same setup and have the same questions. Did you find how to implement this?
              Any help would be great!
              Cheers

  • Load Balancing using Virtual IP on DMZ interface of 5520 ASA

    We want to achieve a load balancing scenario using Virtual IP on DMZ interface on a Cisco ASA 5520.
    The IPs we are going to use on DMZ are 10.15.1.2 and 10.15.1.3
    These IPs are going to be NATted to all inside IPs.
    Lets say our outside IP is X.X.X.X
    This IP points to 10.15.1.2 and 10.15.1.3 with .2 being the primary and .3 being the secondary.
    When I hit the outside IP, it should point me to .2 and that .2 should take me to the inside IPs.
    I need configuration assistance with that.

    Hi Pratik,
    The ASA does not support having 1 global/translated IP address on the outside mapped to multiple local/real IP addresses on the DMZ. If it did, the ASA would have no way of deciding if traffic destined to X.X.X.X is really meant for 10.15.1.2 or 10.15.1.3. For this scenario, you should use a dedicated load balancer or a router that supports policy-based routing.
    -Mike

  • Using "bridge mode" to extend a network question

    I had been using my TC as my only wireless router. I recently obtained FiOS service and they provided me with a router that is working just fine. That router is in the basement. The house is wired for internet so I connected the TC upstairs thinking I could use it to extend the signal.
    I put it in bridge mode but even when I'm in the same room my connecting devices don't show a very strong wireless signal. I'm wondering if I've set it up correctly.
    I noticed when I go into the airport utility that wireless mode is turned off. Is this correct for what I'm trying to do?
    If I turn on the option to "extend a wireless network) I'm not sure if I'm supposed to enter the name of the network currently assigned to my other router. A password is pre-filled in there it looks like but perhaps that from when I used to the TC by itself.
    Under the "internet" tab, I have "connection sharing" set to "off-bridge mode." I think that's correct, yes?
    Thanks.

    Bridge mode is the correct setting for Connection Sharing on your TC, but you need to configure your wireless on the TC to "Create a wireless network" with the exact same name (SSID), security and password that the FIOS router is using. This will, in effect, expand your network. Your laptop will automatically connect to the device with the strongest signal as you move around the house. This is known as a "roaming" network, and it is the basic network design behind most commercial wireless installations.
    The "extend a wireless network" setting is only used if you have another Apple "n" router as your main base station and you want to expand the network using wireless only, not ethernet. The "extend" setting would not be compatible with any of the FIOS routers, so you would not be able to use this setting on your network.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to add new fields in the EBP front end..

    Hi All, Can any one let me know the process of how to add new fileds in the shopping cart creation screens by using the "Tag Browser" option in the Object navigator. Best Regards, Mahesh. J

  • Can't open itunes because pthreadVC2.dll was not found?

    I have enjoyed itunes for a long time on my Sony Vaio, but now everytime I try to open it I get this message: "This application has failed to start because pthreadVC2.dll was not found". I have followed the instructions of previous posts, repeatedly

  • Issue with XML & XSL...

    Hi All, I am trying to display a saved XML file with a pre-defined XSL, which was provided to us by a third party vendor. The XML file is the same format the third party vendor expects it to be: This is the code I am using to display the XML file in

  • Maximum Number of JDBC Datasources

    Does anyone know if there is a limit or if there is a recommended max to the number of JDBC datasources that a standard version of CF8 can handle? We have approx. 500 on our server and occasionally the server restarts due to Out of Memory errors. Thi

  • Can anyone tell me a postal address to allow me to...

    Good evening folks, I've had a pretty horrible time dealing with BT customer services recently. I've needed to contact them because my broadband has for quite a few months now has been dropping constantly, and even when it recovers it's often at a di