Fixed lots of Effect Bugs

Hey,
I have done a lot in my sandbox to fix Effect bugs, and add things that weren't in general working properly.  These include:
1) Added/removed Effects.
- Now all components, spark and halo, can have added/removed effects.
2) Popup Effects.
- Added/removed effects did not work correctly with popups, even in the old implementation.  Now, even with PopUpAnchor, you can run added/removed effects on the popup.  Move effects work correctly too, taking into consideration the popup position before animating.
3) EffectManager was modified for handling these changes, as was PopUpAnchor, PopUpManager, SystemManager, and ChildManager.  Nothing that would break anything, as I have run the tests and everything works fine.
Please pull my sandbox changes when you get a chance.  Thanks!

Thanks a lot Matt.
My goal in creating my own sandbox was to fix all the little things I find as I go, optimize things here and there, and refactor the code if I need to (without modifying the API) to make it easier to do things.
These Effect fixes just made it so you could do what you expect, b/c it was doing strange things before .
It would be very helpful if there was a workflow for merging these sandboxes changes into the main branch so I could use the Framework "swz", unless there is a way, or you're planning on creating a way, to create my own.
Thanks,
Lance

Similar Messages

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 10131: Fixes to several effects bugs and one styles-related bug.

    Revision: 10131
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-09-10 14:25:42 -0700 (Thu, 10 Sep 2009)
    Log Message:
    Fixes to several effects bugs and one styles-related bug.
    QE notes: Fixes to all filed auto-center feature bugs.
    Doc notes: None
    Bugs: sdk-22994, sdk-22992, sdk-22990, sdk-21850, sdk-22973
    Reviewer: Jason (+Glenn for RadioButton/CheckBox changes, 21850)
    Tests run: checkintests, Mustella (transform effects, Slider, DataGrid - all passed last week, prior to skin/test changes)
    Is noteworthy for integration: No
    Ticket Links:
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/sdk-22994
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/sdk-22992
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/sdk-22990
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/sdk-21850
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/sdk-22973
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/controls/CheckBox.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/controls/RadioButton.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/core/UIComponent.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/effects/effectClasses/SoundEffectInst ance.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/AnimateTransform.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/Move.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/Move3D.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/Rotate.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/Rotate3D.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/Scale.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/Scale3D.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/supportClasses/AnimateTransfor mInstance.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/supportClasses/GraphicEleme nt.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/tools/dependencychecker/frameworkSwcExceptionsList.txt

  • Fixed lot size key has no effect on planned orders generated for VC PIRu2019s

    Hello gurus,
    does anyone have an idea why the fixed lot size key is not having an effect on the planned orders that are generated for the Planned Independent Requirements (PIR) for MTO configurable materials. My client is using planning strategy 56.
    I have copied & customized the Fixed lot size key FX to suit the MTO production (u201CLot size as in short-term periodu201D activated) that works nicely even with configurable materials when a planned order is generated for a sales order. But the planned orders in the preplanning segment, i.e. that were generated for PIR's, are still created equally to the PIR quantity.
    Is this behavior an error or an SAP feature? Though, I have reviewed the OSS Note 437098 that might be related to this. Can anyone tell me if it is related to this issue?
    Regards,
    Mikko

    Got the answer fro SAP:
    Please consider the following note, which provides the explanation about this behavior of the lot-size, when VSE requirements are used:
    125498 - MRP/Docu: Planning segment and lot-for-lot order quantity
    The following section of the note describes your scenario in detail:
    "The planned independent requirements for a material are in a separate
    planning segment (planning strategy planning without final assembly,
    requirements type VSE, VSEV).
    You enter a rounding value or a rounding profile or an lot size that is
    not exact in the material master.
    Material Requirements Planning:
    In Material Requirements Planning, planned orders are generated for the
    planned independent requirements. The lot size settings (such as fixed
    lot size or minimum lot size) are also not taken into account."

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 11447: Fix to 3 unrelated bugs.

    Revision: 11447
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-11-04 16:12:40 -0800 (Wed, 04 Nov 2009)
    Log Message:
    Fix to 3 unrelated bugs.
    - Auto-fading logic was clobbering the state-specified value of alpha in some situations (and the logic was way complex and fragile, so a refactoring was needed).
    - Animation now handles sorting of Resize animations to be processed first in each frame, to improve some of the Resize/transform-effect interaction.
    - Post-layout translation animations were being automatically created in some situations, ignoring any startDelays set on the real translation animations. The fix was to pick up the real translation animation info to pre-populate the post-layout animations.
    QE notes: None
    Doc notes:  None
    Bugs:  sdk-23399, sdk-22563, sdk-24010, sdk-23252
    Reviewer: Kevin
    Tests run: checkintests, Mustella spark/effects
    Is noteworthy for integration: Yes - some fixes requested by Tools
    Ticket Links:
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/sdk-23399
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/sdk-22563
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/sdk-24010
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/sdk-23252
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/animation/Animation.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/supportClasses/AnimateTransfor mInstance.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/supportClasses/FadeInstance.as

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 13133: Fix to transform effects to ignore projection on 2D effects.

    Revision: 13133
    Revision: 13133
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-12-21 16:02:54 -0800 (Mon, 21 Dec 2009)
    Log Message:
    Fix to transform effects to ignore projection on 2D effects. The prior implementation meant that even 2D effects, like Move, would cause us to set the projection information on a target object's container, even though we were not changing 3D values.
    The fix is to set the default values of the projection properties to false in AnimateTransformInstance. That way, any 3D effect (AnimateTransform3D or its subclasses) would cuase the properties to be set according to the 3D defaults (or values that the developer set them to), whereas any 2D effect would leave the values false, which would result in our ignoring the projection matrix for that effect.
    QE notes: Breaks several AnimateTransform tests in Mustella, but new behavior is correct and tests should be updated (they have been excluded for now)
    Doc notes: None
    Bugs: SDK-24396
    Reviewer: Ely
    Tests run: Checkintests, Mustella sparrk transform effects (AnimateTransform, Move, AnimateTransform3D, etc.)
    Is noteworthy for integration: no
    Ticket Links:
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-24396
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/supportClasses/AnimateTransfor mInstance.as

    I had downloaded it for test, and requested for evaluation license...
    But I haven't got license, and also I am not able to find Flash Builder Plugins from HFCD site....
    I think those plugins are removed from site....
    Please help me, if anyone have those plugins...

  • Report for Reorder point, safety stock, current stock and fixed lot size

    Hi,
    Purchasing Dept. is looking for a report which can give list of materials falling below the reorder point, so that they can go ahead and create procurement proposals for those materials.
    They also want to see the Reorder Point, Safety Stock, current stock and fixed lot size in the same report.
    Let me know if there ia any standard report availbale which displays the same or any approach to get the same.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards,
    Shankar Goud.

    Hi,
    There is no standard report because this is meant to be managed by the MRP run.
    The MRP lists show all materials that have a problem (such as stock below reorderpoint) but MRP generates requirements for these anyway and so all you need to do is to look for the MRP generated requirements (requisitions?) and you have your list?
    Are you using MRP?
    If so then please use the standard functions in MRP to get this.
    If not, then WHY NOT?
    Steve B

  • Different fix lot size depending on the production version

    Hi all,
    I have the next scenario:
    2 production versions. 2 different fix lot size por each. So:
    Prod Version 1 - Fix lot size 200
    Prod Version 2 - Fix lot size 300
    I created the Quota Arrangement just to make SAP to take my favourite version. And trought the quota, I can define the lot size for each version. BUT.
    If I change the version in the order or in the planned order, the quantity don't change.
    So: How can I manage 2 different fix lot size for 2 different product versions? If I change the version once the order is created, how can I do the system change de quantity to the right one?
    Thanks in advante
    << Please do not offer points >>
    Edited by: Rob Burbank on Oct 1, 2010 2:53 PM

    I have n't  tried this scenario,
    This is my Idea
    Create a two production version
    for ex: lot size 100 to 1000, set the rounding profile qty as 1000
    for lot size 1001 to 99999, set the lot rounding profile value to 5000
    BY this way u can get the two lot based on the rounding profie
    Expert; please correct if i am wrong
    Edited by: Sundaresan . E. V on Oct 1, 2010 4:12 PM

  • HOW TO DEFINE THE LOT SIZE THAT CONSIDERS MAX STOCK AND IN FIXED LOT

    Hi Gurus,
    I have a requirement where the client wants to procure the material in fixed lots of 125. they are using manual reorder point VB with reorder point of 100. The maximum allowed stock is 400.
    When the MRP runs they want to generate a  PR that is close to 400 and also a multiple of 125. I tried to use FX and it is only generating procurement proposal for 125. When I use HB it is considering the max stock but not generating the proposal in multiples of 125. Can anyone help me out with this.
    Regards

    Hi,
    I think your problem could be solved by using rounding profile but not using
    fixed lotsize.
    In rounding profile you have to give threshold value and rounding value
    For the threshold value 1-------  Rounding value 125
                threshold value 126------Rounding value 250
                threshold value 251-------Rounding value 375
                threshold value 376 -
    Rounding value  400
    Regards,
    nandha

  • Fixed Lot Size

    Dear Gurus,
    I am simulating the functionality of Fixed Lot Size so I enter Lot Size = FX and indicated Fixed order Quantity = 40,000 in Material Master. We are using Ind./Coll = 1 and I want to generate fixed quantity of planned order equal to 40,000. But when I run MD42, the system still generated planned order equal to the shortage/required quantity. Our requirement is to generate fixed quantity of 40,000 per planned order regardless of demand requirement.  
    Please help. Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    SD

    Hi,
    Please find my reply below,
    Use MRP Type VB:Manual reorder point planning:Here you need to define reorder point in material master in MRP view.When the stock level reaches the re order point then system will create a procurement proposals.
    Regards,
    Kumar.S

  • Please Fix your "Legacy Desktop" BUG!

    Windows 8 Best Desktop eXPerience Series
    My Videos have Timeline can jump to issues
    I don't Join any advertising plan, Click for free.
    Example:
    http://youtu.be/PHzMhjpLPwE
    http://youtu.be/ivX-ccNW7cs
    Timeline: 3:22, 3:30 (0:00 Microsoft Module only)
    http://youtu.be/bqa6JFZYMpY
    Timeline: 00:38
    folder/Window/App show to background, Move/Copy window show to background, "Saves as..." window show to background, Third Party App Custom Popup UI show to background for some reason
    hard-sell metro UI???
    <=easy to reproduce 
    Why Microsoft don't Fix your Legacy Desktop bug? 1.x years ago (Win8 to 8.1 update 1)
    affect OS: Windows 8 Release Preview to Windows 8.1 update 1 (Road to Windows 8.2?)
    Use Windows 8/8.1 now, You Can Get It. ~the bug desktop story~ 

    Upload Srceenshot from Microsoft
    Community forum.

  • Fixed Lot Size and Assemby Scrap

    Hi Gurus,
    I've an issue using a Material with Fixed Lot Size (MRP View) and Assembly Scrap.
    The system doesn't increase the base quantiy (creating a Process Order) with the Assembly Scrap defined in the Material Master, if you change manually the quantity in the COR2 quantiy will be recalculated correctly.
    Anybody can help me?
    Thanks
    Marco

    >
    Marco Spinell wrote:
    > Hi Gurus,
    > I've an issue using a Material with Fixed Lot Size (MRP View) and Assembly Scrap.
    >
    > The system doesn't increase the base quantiy (creating a Process Order) with the Assembly Scrap defined in the Material Master, if you change manually the quantity in the COR2 quantiy will be recalculated correctly.
    > Anybody can help me?
    >
    > Thanks
    > Marco
    dear marco,
    One changes in my earlier post
    IF fixed lot size is 1000, and  assemby scrap as 10 %
    if the pir is for 900
    after running MRP system will create a plan order for 1000
    In MD04 , you can see the receipt reqmt as 900 and scrap as 100
    i.e System will allocate the scrap with in the fixed lot size
    Once the plan  order is converted in to process order you can see
    the total qty as 1000 and scrap 100
    for other lot size system will add the PIR reqmt +assembly scrap %,
    Yes you can change the qty in COr2, system will update as per the scrap qty , i.e system will allocate the qty for scrap
    for ex , if you are changing the  total qty as 10000, system will propose 1000 as scrap,
    when you save the order and see the mD04
    you can see the receipt/ reqmt qty as 9000 and scrap as 1000
    i.e system will allocate the 1000 qty from total qty
    Hope you are clear how the fixed lot size is working for assembly scrap

  • SNP quota arrangement with fixed lot size

    Hi all,
    i have a question regarding quota arrangement for external procurement in snp heuristic. Whe have 2 sources of suppy created by info record. The quota is 25% for the first and 75% for the second one. In product master there is maintained a fixed lot sice of 500.000. Im wondering that the snp heuristic creates 2 requisitions of 500.000 for each sos at the same day. So we get an serios excess. Any ideas?
    Kind regards,
    Christian

    Hi,
    thanks for reply. Ok, normally net requirement calculation works properly. In case of a shortage the heuristic shall apply an receipt with the fixed lot size wich is maintained in material master. However, in out particular case it generates the double receipt quantity which is not needed at the receipt date.
    The heuristic should do the following:
    Day 01 Stock 100   
    Day 02 DepDmd 20 
    Day 03 DepDmd 20 
    Day 04 DepDmd 20
    Day 05 DepDmd 20
    Day 06 DepDmd 20
    Day 07 PurReq 100 !! Source 1!!
    Day 08 DepDmd 20
    Day xx PurReq 100 !! Source 2!!
    and not:
    Day 01 Stock 100   
    Day 02 DepDmd 20 
    Day 03 DepDmd 20 
    Day 04 DepDmd 20
    Day 05 DepDmd 20
    Day 06 DepDmd 20
    Day 07 PurReq 100 !! Source 1!!
    Day 07 PurReq 100 !! Source 2!!
    Day 08 DepDmd 20
    In this example 100 would be the fixed lot size from material master.
    Best regards,
    Christian

  • MRP planning Purchase REQ per fixed lot size

    Folks,
    I have materials which have MRP type PD with fixed lot size of 20 pieces. Safety stock = 200 pieces. MRP run results in 10 preqs of 20 pieces each. I would like to have 1 Preq of 200 pieces. How can this be achieved?
    Regards,
    MdZ

    Hi,
    This is because of Lot size "FX" you maintained as 20.
    For FX lot size system will divide the total qty as per the fixed lot qty & throw that much of PR for that stock.
    So Safety stock = 200, FX =20 so PR will be 200/20 = 10 PRs
    If you want 1 PR for your safety stock, then change the Lot size to "EX" then system will throw 1 PR for 200 qty as per your Safety stock
    rgds
    gsc

  • Is there a fix for scroll effects on mobile devices?

    Is there a fix for scroll effects disabling pinch & zoom on mobile devices?

    Hello,
    I am afraid there is no workaround available for this as of now.
    However, I would welcome any comments from other community members if they have used some workaround or have any suggestions.
    Regards,
    Sachin

  • Fixed lot size and Minimum lot size

    Dear senior,
    My client has the following scenario. His supplier provides the item in a fixed lot size of 100. The minimum lot size to be ordered is 300.
    The supplier is a fixed vendor.
    I tried to maintain this information in the Material Master MRP views. Lot size  - FX, Fixed lot size - 100, Minimum lot size - 300.
    However, everytime, the minimum lot size will get reset.
    Is there any way , I can maintain this scenario via configuration or any other method?
    Thank you.

    Hi,
    Fixed lot size - 100 means for every 100 quantity system will create one purchase document.
    If you selected Lot size - FX - Fixed order quantity , then no need to maintain Minimum lot size & Maximum lot size fields.
    Then you have to maintain Fixed lot size filed only.
    Ex: 
    Lot size = FX
    Fixed lot size = 100
    There is a requirement of 300. Then system will create 3 PO's with quantity of 100 each.
    If Lot size is Ex - Lot-for-lot order quantity, then only need to maintain Minimum lot size & Maximum lot size fields in the MRP 1 view.
    Ex: Lot size = EX
    Minimum lot size = 60
    Maximum lot size = 100
    There is a requirement of 250. Then system will create 3 purchase documents, two documents with the quantity of 100 and third one with the quantity of 60.
    That's why, in your case system is reseting Minimum lot size every time.
    If you want to maintain Minimum lot size, then maintain
    Lot size as EX
    Minimum lot size = 100
    Max lot size = 300
    It will solve your problem.
    Regards
    KRK

Maybe you are looking for