Flash in Premiere Elements Image Quality issue

Hello,
I've decided now that I am going to create animated films in Flash and then edit them in Premiere Elements. the problem is, is that when I export it from Flash to Premiere Elements the Image quality is detiereoreted (i.e fuzzy, blurry, out of focus, general ugly to look at). I first realised that I couldnt use an swf file in Premiere and isntead I should use an AVI. So I did. Problem is I'm still having the same problem. the Image quality is still terrible and doesn't equal up to the origonal image quality. And then tried Uncompressing it and all that did is make the video clip jump over about 80 frames and still the image quality is terrible. Is their one little thing that I'm doing wrong or Am I altogether not getting this right.
Programs I'm using:
Macromedia Flash MX 2004
Adobe Premiere Elements 3.0
Adobe Premiere Elements 7.0 (currently not working)

The MS DV CODEC should be installed on your system already. Whether Flash can Export to it could still be an issue. I'll have to check my version of Flash (think that it's Studio 8, but I've had it around from version 2) to see what all of the options are.
I've been handed many Flash animations that were Exported as .MOV with the Animation CODEC, and these have edited fine.
Other than the huge file sizes, AVI [Uncompressed] should work fine too. You might have resource issues, but that would depend on your system, more than on your NLE. I've used these with no issues many times.
Another likely candidate would be the free Lagarith Lossless CODEC. I use it for intermediate transfer and it edits fine in PrPro. I would assume that it would be the same in PrE, but cannot verify this.
On Monday, I'll be on my workstation with Flash and will tell you the exact version, plus the Export options available.
Good luck,
Hunt

Similar Messages

  • Image quality issues in PS - word to PDF

    Hi,
    I am having major image quality issues when trying to make my word document a clean, clear PDF. Images become distorted. Borders for tables and text that are equal px size look like they are different sizes throughout the document.
    I have searched the internet, read help, and tried many different things:
    Word 2007 - Changed image %, image size, export options, adjusted px for borders, used different styles
    Acrobat 9 Pro - Changed import settings, import options, print options, tried press quality, high quality, etc.
    Photoshop CS4 - Changed ppx, file format, compression options
    What can I do to get a clean, clear PDF file with the images and borders preserved?
    Thank you.

    In converting a MS Office file to PDF, Photoshop cannot help in any way and will likely cause more harm as it may rasterize vector data. Expect your ideal answer in the Acrobat forum.

  • Image Quality issue with script

    So I recently wrote a simple script to output an image at a bunch of different resolutions. However, I am running into an image quality issue that I don't run into when I do the same thing manually.
    Here is an example image showcasing the image: http://terminalvelocity.ca/temp/notworking.jpg
    As you can see along the top of the model's forhead there is destinct color fragmentation. Which seems very strange.
    Here is the script, it is pretty simple, it asks for a few simple config options. (the above image was created using default settings). It then figures out the correct ratios and loops through doing each resize, saving the image, then reverting the history so each iteration uses the original image data and not the resized version:
    doc = app.activeDocument;
    openFilePath = Folder.selectDialog ("Where do you want the images to be saved?");
    maxSize = Number(prompt("What would you like to be the maximum length of the long edge? (Image is never upsized) (pixels)", 2800)); 
    minSize = Number(prompt("What would you like to be the minimum length of the long edge? (pixels)", 100));
    gap = Number(prompt("How much smaller should each image be? (pixels)", 100)); 
    quality = Number(prompt("What quality would you like the JPG exported as (0-12)", 10)); 
    var size;
    var primary;
    var secondary;
    if(doc.width > doc.height){
              primary = doc.width;
              secondary = doc.height;
    }else{
              primary = doc.height;
              secondary = doc.width;
    var ratio = secondary/primary;
    var size = [];
    for(var i = maxSize;i>minSize;i-=gap){
              var  p = i
              var s = i * ratio;
              size.push([p,s]);
    var w;
    var h;
    var n;
    for(var i in size){
              if(doc.width > doc.height){
                        w = n = size[i][0];
                        h = size[i][1];
              }else{
                        w = size[i][1];
                        n= h = size[i][0];
              if(doc.width >= w && doc.height >= h){
                        doc.resizeImage(w,h,null,ResampleMethod.BICUBICSHARPER);
                        jpgFile = new File(openFilePath+"/"+n+".jpeg" )
                        jpgSaveOptions = new JPEGSaveOptions()
                        jpgSaveOptions.embedColorProfile = false
                        jpgSaveOptions.formatOptions =
                        FormatOptions.STANDARDBASELINE
                        jpgSaveOptions.matte = MatteType.NONE
                        jpgSaveOptions.quality = quality
                        app.activeDocument.saveAs(jpgFile, jpgSaveOptions, true,Extension.LOWERCASE);             
                        doc.activeHistoryState = doc.historyStates[doc.historyStates.length-2];
    In comparison, here is an example of an image of the exact same resolution that does not exhibit this issue at all:
    The steps taken to save this image were as follows: http://photography.terminalvelocity.ca/content/images/2012/avery_konrad_6/horizontal/1500. jpg
    Image > Resize > Bicubic Sharper (1500px);
    Save For Web
         Jpeg
         Quality 75
         Optimzed: true
         Progressive: false
         Blur: 0
         Convert to sRGB: true   
    Anyway, as you can see, The manually exported image does not have any of the quality issues that are present within the scripted image. I am pretty new to photoshop scriping so am assuming it has something to do with me missing some sort of option in the save settings. Any help would be swell.
    Also note, this doesn't occur on all images, I usually don't see an issue when using the script, however, something about the tones of this particular photo make it really obvious.
    I am using the latest version of Photoshop CS6 (creative cloud) on Max OSX
    thanks so much!

    I'm on windows find the bicubicsharper does not work well it the image being resized has been highly sharpened all ready. Because of my Photoshop preferences I had to make minor modification to your script. I'm also a bit colorblind so i don't see many color issues so I include a screen capture if what windows does with your image and script.
    var orig_ruler_units = app.preferences.rulerUnits;
    app.preferences.rulerUnits = Units.PIXELS;          // Set the ruler units to PIXELS
    doc = app.activeDocument;
    openFilePath = Folder.selectDialog ("Where do you want the images to be saved?");
    maxSize = Number(prompt("What would you like to be the maximum length of the long edge? (Image is never upsized) (pixels)", 2800));
    minSize = Number(prompt("What would you like to be the minimum length of the long edge? (pixels)", 100));
    gap = Number(prompt("How much smaller should each image be? (pixels)", 100));
    quality = Number(prompt("What quality would you like the JPG exported as (0-12)", 10));
    var size;
    var primary;
    var secondary;
    if(doc.width > doc.height){
              primary = doc.width;
              secondary = doc.height;
    }else{
              primary = doc.height;
              secondary = doc.width;
    var ratio = secondary/primary;
    var size = [];
    for(var i = maxSize;i>minSize;i-=gap){
              var  p = i
              var s = i * ratio;
              size.push([p,s]);
    var w;
    var h;
    var n;
    for(var i in size){
              if(doc.width > doc.height){
                        w = n = size[i][0];
                        h = size[i][1];
              }else{
                        w = size[i][1];
                        n= h = size[i][0];
              if(doc.width.value >= w && doc.height.value >= h){
                        doc.resizeImage(w,h,null,ResampleMethod.BICUBICSHARPER);
                        jpgFile = new File(openFilePath+"/"+n+".jpeg" )
                        jpgSaveOptions = new JPEGSaveOptions()
                        jpgSaveOptions.embedColorProfile = false
                        jpgSaveOptions.formatOptions =
                        FormatOptions.STANDARDBASELINE
                        jpgSaveOptions.matte = MatteType.NONE
                        jpgSaveOptions.quality = quality
                        app.activeDocument.saveAs(jpgFile, jpgSaveOptions, true,Extension.LOWERCASE);            
                        doc.activeHistoryState = doc.historyStates[doc.historyStates.length-2];
    app.preferences.rulerUnits = orig_ruler_units;          // Reset units to original settings

  • Bizarre Lightroom image quality issue

    I have a weird image quality issue with Lightroom, when opening RAW files (haven't tried it with any other file format, admittedly).
    Here's an example of how the image appears in Lightroom.  As an experiment, I exported the image as a TIFF and opened it in Gimp to see if it was just down to a display issue, but the exported TIFF showed the same quality issues as Lightroom. Aside from exporting as a TIFF (and then saving as a Jpeg), this image is SOOC:
    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/swisstony10/4912360565/" title="IMG_4134 by swisstony10, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4093/4912360565_5891c0160f.jpg" width="333" height="500" alt="IMG_4134" /></a>
    If I open the same image in Canon's own DPP software, this image quality issue does not occur, so I know that it's not an issue with the memory card, the camera, or my laptop's monitor.  The SOOC image from DPP (exported as a Jpeg) looks like this:
    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/swisstony10/4912362053/" title="IMG_4134b by swisstony10, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4116/4912362053_1ca92078c9.jpg" width="333" height="500" alt="IMG_4134b" /></a>
    Has anybody else experienced this, and if so, is there a fix?  (there had better be - I'm not going to be overly chuffed if my expensive Adobe software is being outperformed by the free stuff..  )
    Russ.

    This is proving to be an extremely helpful forum!
    Thanks for the advice on embedding my calibrated colour space - I don't very often send files anywhere other than my own home network (where all the monitors are calibrated), and when I do upload any to Flickr, it's never caused a problem in the past (and if I get anything printed by a lab, I use their ICC profile).  I'll definitely keep that all in mind though..
    Here's the original RAW file of the image I used as the example  https://www.yousendit.com/download/aHlUa3ZONmNFd2Z2Wmc9PQ   - I hope that helps someone to shed some light on what's going wrong.  From what you've said though, it does look as if this is just an extreme example of something that Lightroom isn't very good at doing.
    As I said in my original post, it'll be a bit disappointing if that's the case though, because a fair amount of the pictures I take tend to be of bands playing in what are, let's face it, diabolical conditions for photography.  (At the festival I was attending at the weekend for example, all of the photographers - even the seasoned pros - were moaning about how awful the lighting was in the Big Top, and how much it sucked to try and get a decent picture there, as opposed to the main stage where everybody wasn't completely backlit by either red or purple lights.  I appreciate that Lightroom is a much more powerful tool than Canon's DPP - the noise reduction controls on their own completely rock - but I must admit I'm a bit surprised that it can't handle highlights terribly well...

  • Adobe premiere elements 10  Quality and audio issues

    Im using adobe premiere elements 10 and im trying to edit my videos that i got form the elgato ive allays had no problems until two days ago when i import a video to work on it the quality goes to **** and the audio gets messed up  and i when i check the video on elgato its perfect  so something is going wrong and i need your help to fix it.

    op c
    On what computer operating system is your Premiere Elements 10 running? And, what video card/graphics card does this computer use? NVIDIA GeForce?
    If so, stop and let us know.
    From what I have read, if you are using Elgato Video Capture, you are probably working on a Mac computer capturing H.264 or MPEG-4 640 x 480 with AAC audio. Is that correct? If so, what is the file extension of the capture that you put on the Premiere Elements 10 Mac Timeline?
    Have you changed any of the default settings for Elgato Video Capture under its preferences?
    How does this recent bad video's properties compare with others from the good video with which you had no problems?
    What is the project preset that you are setting in either case?
    Can you still bring the "good" Elgato captures into a Premiere Elements 10 Mac project and  they are still "good" while the recent ones on that
    same Timeline look not so good?
    ATR

  • Can premiere elements make quality DVDs from photos?

    Can you make excellent quality DVD's from photos using Premiere Elements 10 using a Mac?"

    You should not have any issues.
    If you are using only Still Images, here are the tips:
    Set up your Project as either NTSC, or PAL DVD, in either Widescreen 16:9, or Standard 4:3. For most current still cameras, the Widescreen 16:9 would be the more likely candidate, but also consider the TV's, that your viewers will likely have. If there are a ton of older, 4:3 CRT TV's in that mix, then consider them.
    Scale all of your Still Images to about the Frame Size of your Project, so ~ 720 x 480 for NTSC. See this ARTICLE.
    Import those into the Project.
    Drag those to the Timeline, and edit, as required.
    Add any Scene Selection Markers.
    When edited, go to Create Menus, and choose either a Wide, or Standard (depends on which you chose) Menu Set, then adjust, as is required.
    When authored, Burn to Disc.
    Remember, your Still Images are probably much higher resolution, than DVD, so do not expect HD quality material. However, if you/your viewers have an up-rezzing DVD, or BD player, properly hooked up, the resultant DVD will look spectacular.
    Good luck,
    Hunt

  • Premiere Elements 13 - some issues

    So I've been playing around a little with the new Premiere Elements 13 trial. I didn't use the last version for any lengthy period, but I like to try out every new version of Elements to see if I like it. I jotted down a few notes as I was messing around:
    - Can't use ALT + Mouse Wheel to zoom in/out of timeline (I find this extremely useful in Premiere Pro and other editors)
    - Can't use C or S to split a clip. Have to use CTRL+K (!), or click a scissor icon on the playhead.
    - The font browser does not list each font in it's own font style. You have to click each individual font to see what it looks like.
    - Can't type the name of a font, you have to manually scroll to find it.
    - I couldn't get the Animations for titles to work. I could select the thumbnail for the animation, but the Apply button is always greyed out, no matter what I do.
    - Very limited options for text, no kerning or leading, no custom stroke, shadow, etc.
    - Seems a bit buggy. I couldn't get the Vignetting effect to work. I fiddled with all the settings on both a video clip and a still image, and it just didn't do anything.
    - There were some weird instances where icons went kinda screwy. Like once or twice when I was editing text, it would highlight both Left and Center text alignment icons indicating that I had both of those features turned on at once (!?). Other times the window redraw seemed a little sluggish and glitchy.
    - Whenever I try to add an effect from the Hollywood Looks menu, it brings up a warning that all my previous effects on that clip will be deleted. However it will let me add those same effects *after* applying Hollywood Looks.
    - When you click a menu item (File, Edit, Clip, etc), you cannot move the mouse left or right to automatically open the next menu item. You have to individually click File, Edit, Clip, etc, to open those menus.
    - Everything about the interface is geared towards tablet use, so you end up using the mouse a lot more on a PC to click this button and that button.

    - Can't use C or S to split a clip. Have to use CTRL+K (!), or click a scissor icon on the playhead.
    You can do what ATR suggests. Change the keyboard shortcuts wherever required.
    - The font browser does not list each font in it's own font style. You have to click each individual font to see what it looks like.
    Could you let me know what fonts do not appear the same on the monitor as in the thumbnails?
    - Seems a bit buggy. I couldn't get the Vignetting effect to work. I fiddled with all the settings on both a video clip and a still image, and it just didn't do anything.
    How were you trying to apply the effect and what do you see when you do so? Did you play around with all the sliders and still see no difference on the monitor? Is there a difference you see when you click on the monitor after applying the effect/changing the parameters through the slider?
    - Whenever I try to add an effect from the Hollywood Looks menu, it brings up a warning that all my previous effects on that clip will be deleted. However it will let me add those same effects *after* applying Hollywood Looks.
    This is because of how the Hollywood Looks are designed to be used. Since these are effect presets (multiple effects in combination) that result in a specific "look"; they are best applied in isolation. If any previous effect is applied and we still allow a Hollywood effect to be applied, we will not be able to see what the effect does clearly. For e.g. if you already have a Gaussian Blur effect applied to your clip, and then we allow you to apply the "Red Noir" Hollywood effect, the fact that the "Reds" in the scenes will be highlighted and the others converted to B/W will not be clearly seen since the content is already blurred out. So any previously applied effects was designed to be removed. This holds good even if you apply a Hollywood look "on top of" another one. The previous one will be replaced. Having said that, you can customize the look further by either tweaking an already applied filter or by adding a newer effect on top. That is the reason you can apply an effect on top of the Hollywood Effects and not vice versa.
    - When you click a menu item (File, Edit, Clip, etc), you cannot move the mouse left or right to automatically open the next menu item. You have to individually click File, Edit, Clip, etc, to open those menus.
    We have made a note of this behavior and agree that this is not ideal.
    Regards,
    Premiere Elements Team

  • Image quality issues - Sony Handycam (MPEG) to iMovie / iDVD

    I have read through dozens of posts but the recommendations vary widely and am hoping I can get some guidance specific to my situation. The image quality I am getting from home movies I edit in iMovie11 and burn to DVD in iDVD are far inferior to the original material.
    I have a Sony DCR-TRV17. This camera is a little over 10 years old. It is a miniDV with 500 lines resolution, 680K gross pixels and uses MPEG. While not HD, the image quality is exceptional. The DVDs I used to create using my Sony Viao likewise looked fantastic. But the results I get from iMovie and iDVD are on par with VHS -- very poor, especially in low-light.
    I hope the issue is just the settings when I import, edit (iMovie) and share to iDVD. I generally use the default settings, and often alternate settings don't seem to be selectable. It also sounds from other posts like iMovie sacrifices quality for reduced file size and increased simplicity? I would appreciate help with the following:
    1) Please list the settings I should be adjusting from default when I  a) import, b) edit in iMovie11 and c) share to iDVD and burn -- and the recommended settings for each
    2) Is there a process I should be trying? Should I be creating test DVDs using different settings at each stage and then reviewing various setting combinations to find the best one?
    3) I will most probably buy an HD camcorder very soon, and plan to burn to Blue Rays. I have no problem with going ahead and buying Final Cut and an external drive to burn Blue Rays. Should I just go ahead and do it and get away from iMovie / iDVD entirely. Will Final Cut solve this issue for my old miniDVs without a whole lot of hair pulling? Or will I still have to tinker with a bunch of settings or convoluted processes to get it "right." I never had to tinker with settings on my Viao. Really expected Mac software to be more user friendly…
    Thanks very much for any help or advice!

    On Import you could try unchecking Optimize video and choose Full Size. Your disk space however will get eaten up incredibly quickly choosing these settings as each hour of video = 40GBytes of disk space. So be forewarned about how big those files will expand as they come off the MiniDV tapes.
    Another thing you will immediately see a difference in is how you move files from iMovie to iDVD. Share to iDVD while named in an intuitive way, is NOT the best way to get good quality DVDs out of iMovie. Instead you want to Share to Media Browser. Choose the Large Size setting. Then quit iMovie. Open iDVD, click the Media button, the Movies button. Find your project listed under the iMovie star icon and drag it into the iDVD project. Burn the Disc and see if you get a higher quality disk by Sharing to Media Browser instead of Share to iDVD.
    If you choose a Blu-Ray burner, also get a copy of Roxio Toast. The encoding to Blu-ray that Toast provides will be top notch and prevent you from making mistakes as the recordable Blu-ray disks are more expensive than DVDs. So every mistake will be expensive.

  • DVD Playback - Image Quality Issues...

    I'm curious to know if others are experience sub-par image quality when playing standard DVDs in the iMac with a 24" screen. The picture of the DVDs is sub-par compared to playback of the same DVD on a regular TV monitor. Also, playback is jumpy and or pixelated (looks like digitizing errors) despite the DVD being new and which plays back normally on a typical DVD player and TV monitor.
    Is anyone having similar issues? My computer is new, so this seems odd...

    Hi AM249
    Welcome to Apple Discussions
    SuperDrives are way more senitive that tray load players, is the DVD scrached or dirty?
    Dennis

  • Image quality issue in ACR

    Hi, Can anyone help me?
    I have been using ACR for a while now as a professional photographer, however I have recently started using Alamy picture library. They rejected all my submissions on quality grounds, as they 'lacked definition'. In consulation with another photographer, we have tracked the problem to ACR; the images appear perfect on his mac, and they also appear perfect on mine when I use the Nikon Software. The same quality issue appears in lightroom as well, therefore it is Adobe related. The Sharpening settings are as per ACR default.
    I am using CS3 and ACR 4.6; Some have suggested upgrading to CS5, however surely I shouldnt need to do this, as the Nikon D3 was brought out before I started using CS3, so it should work?
    Please please any help would be appreciated as this problem is driving me insane; I currently have to open all of my RAW files in the Nikon software and save as TIFF to then open in CS3, rather than using the more simple and logical workflow.
    Thanks,
    Rob

    Click the little fly-out menu icon at the upper-right and choose Save New Camera Raw Defaults.
    But be careful, any setting you have changed from default will be saved, so you could inadvertently save a particular color balance setting (instead of As Shot) for example, and that wouldn't be good.
    mijbil250456 wrote:
    I am using CS3 and ACR 4.6; Some have suggested upgrading to CS5, however surely I shouldnt need to do this, as the Nikon D3 was brought out before I started using CS3, so it should work?
    One thing I'd like to add that goes to this comment that you made in the original post:  There's not just one result that can be made from a raw file.  The quality of conversion results is continunuing to improve as Adobe refines their algorithms and more powerful computers are being built to run them. 
    The quality of conversions of the very same raw files from Photoshop CS5, using the PV2010 conversion process can indeed be superior to that from Photoshop CS3.
    In turn, the quality of conversions from Photoshop CS6 can be better than that of conversions from Photoshop CS5.
    We are seeing real improvements to this technology before our very eyes.
    -Noel

  • What are these green flashes in Premiere Elements 7?

    I am getting green flashes on my video in PE7.  These green flashes are not there when I view the video using Windows Media Player.  The green covers the entire picture, and then goes away over the course of less than a second in most cases.  I burned the video to a DVD and played in a DVD player to see if it was only while in PE7, but they were burned to the disc that way as well.  If you need any other information to help, please ask.
    Thank you!

    A lot depends on what kind of camcorder your video came from and how you got it into your computer -- and which settings you selected when you set up your Premiere Elements project.

  • JERKY when viewing inside Premiere Elements 10. Issue has come up a lot before

    JERKY. Have Premiere Elements 10, Editing video from a Canon Still Camera ELPH 500 HS at 1920 x 1080 (absolutely love the video clips this camera produces). I bought a faster PC, i7 CPU 8 gig RAM, memory drive for one of the drives, very fast.
    OK, if I only have one clip and a simple edit such as cut beginning and end, fade in start fade out end, everything is perfect. The minute I start adding a little complexity, text titles, other clips, anything, it slows down and becomes JERKY in adobe and very slow to start/ stop using the mouse or space bar. (It was a lot worse in Premiere Elements 8).

    Per canon manual, clips are MOV (Image: H.264; Audio: Linear PCM (stereo))
    Per properties on PC, here is what it says:
    Camera clips are .MOV
    video 1920 x 1080
    data rate 33478
    23 frames per sec
    Audio 2 sterio,
    14237 kbs
    48kz
    Project Settings:
    DSLR, 1020 x 1080, 24fps
    Note that the window came up asking if I want to put my project settings the same as the video clip,
    and I answered yes, so i think the settings in premiere are good by selecting taking the recommended settings.

  • Adobe Premiere Elements 9 Freezing Issue

    In Adobe Premiere Elements 9, every time I click, the program freezes for at least 30 seconds and sometimes closes.  This happens every time I try to do anything and is very frustrating.
    Personal Computer Specs:
    Quad Core 2.8 GHz CPU
    4 GB RAM
    1 GB GPU
    1TB Hard Drive (Plenty of Room Remains)

    Hi Schaef,
    I'll do my best to try to explain...
    The problem that was causing my issue was that I had chosen the wrong Project Settings.  I tried just playing around with them until the program sped up.
    Here's how to do it:
    When you first open Premiere 9 you will see the regular start-up window.  When you click on 'New Project' you will wait a second then see this:
    When you see this window, select the name and save destination, then click on 'Change Settings...'
    Try playing around with the presets on the left.  If possible, find the option that fits your video footage's particulars.  If that's not available, find one that most closely fits them.
    Once you've found a suitable option, try saving the settings and opening the new project.  If you don't notice any difference, than you should start all over to find a different option.  Repeat this until the program has significantly sped up (as it did for me).
    If none of this helps, I apologize, my knowledge with the program is not very profound.
    Let me know how you make out though!
    Cameron

  • Image Quality Issues from FCE to iDVD

    I've been attempting to take a 16 minute video shot in DV to a DVD and have been disappointed with the results. Using Final Cut Express, I've tried every codec but have found the image quality to be quite a bit less than the original DV footage. Also having a difficult time retaining the original 4:3 aspect ratio of the footage, despite specifying NTSC 4:3. When converting the footage to a Quicktime movie, the quality of the movie appears fine when played back on the Mac, but degraded when the final DVD is burned. Haven't used iDVD much, so the issue may lie there, but it's hard for me to believe that such a relatively small amount of footage would require so much compression that the final DVD image would show this much degradation from the DV footage.
    Is there some magic combination of codec and size that I'm missing when converting to Quicktime?

    Your FCE Easy Set should be DV NTSC.
    Your FCE Sequence Settings should also be DV NTSC.
    Export a QuickTime Movie using Current Settings, Self Contained.
    Bring that file into iDVD where it will be converted internally to MPEG 2.

  • Image quality issue while exporting video to FLV

    Hi, I have a major problem: I am using Adobe Media Encoder to export a movie (FLV format) and the image quality is so bad I can't read the text in my logo. The movie was created with Adobe Premiere Pro CS4. No matter what settings I chose from Media Encoder dropdown menu, I get the same bad quality.
    Can anyone help me?
    Thanks!
    Laurent

    Hi and thanks for the answer. The datarate is 1 500 Kbps, I increased it to 2 500 and I haven't noticed any differences. The source media is MPG from a camcorder. The export settings are 720 X 480 px. What are the sequence settings? I am not familiar with that.
    Thank you,
    Laurent

Maybe you are looking for