Image Quality issue with script

So I recently wrote a simple script to output an image at a bunch of different resolutions. However, I am running into an image quality issue that I don't run into when I do the same thing manually.
Here is an example image showcasing the image: http://terminalvelocity.ca/temp/notworking.jpg
As you can see along the top of the model's forhead there is destinct color fragmentation. Which seems very strange.
Here is the script, it is pretty simple, it asks for a few simple config options. (the above image was created using default settings). It then figures out the correct ratios and loops through doing each resize, saving the image, then reverting the history so each iteration uses the original image data and not the resized version:
doc = app.activeDocument;
openFilePath = Folder.selectDialog ("Where do you want the images to be saved?");
maxSize = Number(prompt("What would you like to be the maximum length of the long edge? (Image is never upsized) (pixels)", 2800)); 
minSize = Number(prompt("What would you like to be the minimum length of the long edge? (pixels)", 100));
gap = Number(prompt("How much smaller should each image be? (pixels)", 100)); 
quality = Number(prompt("What quality would you like the JPG exported as (0-12)", 10)); 
var size;
var primary;
var secondary;
if(doc.width > doc.height){
          primary = doc.width;
          secondary = doc.height;
}else{
          primary = doc.height;
          secondary = doc.width;
var ratio = secondary/primary;
var size = [];
for(var i = maxSize;i>minSize;i-=gap){
          var  p = i
          var s = i * ratio;
          size.push([p,s]);
var w;
var h;
var n;
for(var i in size){
          if(doc.width > doc.height){
                    w = n = size[i][0];
                    h = size[i][1];
          }else{
                    w = size[i][1];
                    n= h = size[i][0];
          if(doc.width >= w && doc.height >= h){
                    doc.resizeImage(w,h,null,ResampleMethod.BICUBICSHARPER);
                    jpgFile = new File(openFilePath+"/"+n+".jpeg" )
                    jpgSaveOptions = new JPEGSaveOptions()
                    jpgSaveOptions.embedColorProfile = false
                    jpgSaveOptions.formatOptions =
                    FormatOptions.STANDARDBASELINE
                    jpgSaveOptions.matte = MatteType.NONE
                    jpgSaveOptions.quality = quality
                    app.activeDocument.saveAs(jpgFile, jpgSaveOptions, true,Extension.LOWERCASE);             
                    doc.activeHistoryState = doc.historyStates[doc.historyStates.length-2];
In comparison, here is an example of an image of the exact same resolution that does not exhibit this issue at all:
The steps taken to save this image were as follows: http://photography.terminalvelocity.ca/content/images/2012/avery_konrad_6/horizontal/1500. jpg
Image > Resize > Bicubic Sharper (1500px);
Save For Web
     Jpeg
     Quality 75
     Optimzed: true
     Progressive: false
     Blur: 0
     Convert to sRGB: true   
Anyway, as you can see, The manually exported image does not have any of the quality issues that are present within the scripted image. I am pretty new to photoshop scriping so am assuming it has something to do with me missing some sort of option in the save settings. Any help would be swell.
Also note, this doesn't occur on all images, I usually don't see an issue when using the script, however, something about the tones of this particular photo make it really obvious.
I am using the latest version of Photoshop CS6 (creative cloud) on Max OSX
thanks so much!

I'm on windows find the bicubicsharper does not work well it the image being resized has been highly sharpened all ready. Because of my Photoshop preferences I had to make minor modification to your script. I'm also a bit colorblind so i don't see many color issues so I include a screen capture if what windows does with your image and script.
var orig_ruler_units = app.preferences.rulerUnits;
app.preferences.rulerUnits = Units.PIXELS;          // Set the ruler units to PIXELS
doc = app.activeDocument;
openFilePath = Folder.selectDialog ("Where do you want the images to be saved?");
maxSize = Number(prompt("What would you like to be the maximum length of the long edge? (Image is never upsized) (pixels)", 2800));
minSize = Number(prompt("What would you like to be the minimum length of the long edge? (pixels)", 100));
gap = Number(prompt("How much smaller should each image be? (pixels)", 100));
quality = Number(prompt("What quality would you like the JPG exported as (0-12)", 10));
var size;
var primary;
var secondary;
if(doc.width > doc.height){
          primary = doc.width;
          secondary = doc.height;
}else{
          primary = doc.height;
          secondary = doc.width;
var ratio = secondary/primary;
var size = [];
for(var i = maxSize;i>minSize;i-=gap){
          var  p = i
          var s = i * ratio;
          size.push([p,s]);
var w;
var h;
var n;
for(var i in size){
          if(doc.width > doc.height){
                    w = n = size[i][0];
                    h = size[i][1];
          }else{
                    w = size[i][1];
                    n= h = size[i][0];
          if(doc.width.value >= w && doc.height.value >= h){
                    doc.resizeImage(w,h,null,ResampleMethod.BICUBICSHARPER);
                    jpgFile = new File(openFilePath+"/"+n+".jpeg" )
                    jpgSaveOptions = new JPEGSaveOptions()
                    jpgSaveOptions.embedColorProfile = false
                    jpgSaveOptions.formatOptions =
                    FormatOptions.STANDARDBASELINE
                    jpgSaveOptions.matte = MatteType.NONE
                    jpgSaveOptions.quality = quality
                    app.activeDocument.saveAs(jpgFile, jpgSaveOptions, true,Extension.LOWERCASE);            
                    doc.activeHistoryState = doc.historyStates[doc.historyStates.length-2];
app.preferences.rulerUnits = orig_ruler_units;          // Reset units to original settings

Similar Messages

  • Bizarre Lightroom image quality issue

    I have a weird image quality issue with Lightroom, when opening RAW files (haven't tried it with any other file format, admittedly).
    Here's an example of how the image appears in Lightroom.  As an experiment, I exported the image as a TIFF and opened it in Gimp to see if it was just down to a display issue, but the exported TIFF showed the same quality issues as Lightroom. Aside from exporting as a TIFF (and then saving as a Jpeg), this image is SOOC:
    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/swisstony10/4912360565/" title="IMG_4134 by swisstony10, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4093/4912360565_5891c0160f.jpg" width="333" height="500" alt="IMG_4134" /></a>
    If I open the same image in Canon's own DPP software, this image quality issue does not occur, so I know that it's not an issue with the memory card, the camera, or my laptop's monitor.  The SOOC image from DPP (exported as a Jpeg) looks like this:
    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/swisstony10/4912362053/" title="IMG_4134b by swisstony10, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4116/4912362053_1ca92078c9.jpg" width="333" height="500" alt="IMG_4134b" /></a>
    Has anybody else experienced this, and if so, is there a fix?  (there had better be - I'm not going to be overly chuffed if my expensive Adobe software is being outperformed by the free stuff..  )
    Russ.

    This is proving to be an extremely helpful forum!
    Thanks for the advice on embedding my calibrated colour space - I don't very often send files anywhere other than my own home network (where all the monitors are calibrated), and when I do upload any to Flickr, it's never caused a problem in the past (and if I get anything printed by a lab, I use their ICC profile).  I'll definitely keep that all in mind though..
    Here's the original RAW file of the image I used as the example  https://www.yousendit.com/download/aHlUa3ZONmNFd2Z2Wmc9PQ   - I hope that helps someone to shed some light on what's going wrong.  From what you've said though, it does look as if this is just an extreme example of something that Lightroom isn't very good at doing.
    As I said in my original post, it'll be a bit disappointing if that's the case though, because a fair amount of the pictures I take tend to be of bands playing in what are, let's face it, diabolical conditions for photography.  (At the festival I was attending at the weekend for example, all of the photographers - even the seasoned pros - were moaning about how awful the lighting was in the Big Top, and how much it sucked to try and get a decent picture there, as opposed to the main stage where everybody wasn't completely backlit by either red or purple lights.  I appreciate that Lightroom is a much more powerful tool than Canon's DPP - the noise reduction controls on their own completely rock - but I must admit I'm a bit surprised that it can't handle highlights terribly well...

  • Image quality issues in PS - word to PDF

    Hi,
    I am having major image quality issues when trying to make my word document a clean, clear PDF. Images become distorted. Borders for tables and text that are equal px size look like they are different sizes throughout the document.
    I have searched the internet, read help, and tried many different things:
    Word 2007 - Changed image %, image size, export options, adjusted px for borders, used different styles
    Acrobat 9 Pro - Changed import settings, import options, print options, tried press quality, high quality, etc.
    Photoshop CS4 - Changed ppx, file format, compression options
    What can I do to get a clean, clear PDF file with the images and borders preserved?
    Thank you.

    In converting a MS Office file to PDF, Photoshop cannot help in any way and will likely cause more harm as it may rasterize vector data. Expect your ideal answer in the Acrobat forum.

  • Photo Quality Issues with Pixma MG6220

    I am frustrated.  The first photo printed from this printer was of poor quality.  It was very 'grainy' and 'noisey'.  I printed from the printer itself (put camera card into printer).  I then printed from Picasa, same problem, very poor quality.  It was then a couple of months before I attempted printing again.  I printed from PS Elements 11.  The quality was much improved but not what I expected from this printer.  I finally called tech support, after tweaking every setting I could find.  They essentially blamed my computer, wanted to reinstall the drivers and I need to buy new ink cartridges.  It's NOT my computer.  I'm curious as to why they think it's the drivers.  It very well could be bad cartridges.  The printer was purchased in December (six months ago).  I'm wondering why the photo software would make a difference.  I'm irritated that the people I spoke with seemed completely incurious as to what, exactlly, was wrong with the photos.  It would appear that no on else has had this issue.  The reviews for this printer were very good.  I can't imagine reviewing these images and stating that they are "excellent" as I have read from many reviews.  I'll be more than happy to attach scanned images for review (scanner works fine).  Thank you. 

    Hi,
    Check this for scanned images and originals for reference:
    http://flickr.com/gp/skital/Y9615F
    (you can download full-res versions there as well - it's a bit hidden if you don't know flickr)
    This was using Canon Glossy II photo paper and NOT Canon Ink. I was trying different replacement inks over the time and I had similar results.
    I'm a little bit hesitant with spending more money on this printer, esp. that I had never have this kind of quality issues with my previous Canon printer (MP600) when using non canon inks - I had color issues but never grainess.
    Well, I may try original inks again, but it breaks a deal for this printer.

  • Quality issues with IDVD solved

    Hi All
    RE. Best looking IDVD playback.
    May this help all those stuggling with quality issues with perfect looking Qtime files encoded by IDVD coming out looking crap.
    Simply this: instead of exporting your media from your FCP timeline in H.264 - instead select Motion JPEG A. This is found under your setting options in your Qtime movie/settings export window.
    Your files will export much, much faster than Apple's default setting of H.264, you will also get very smooth playback wihtout any jaggies or nasty artifacts. Files are a larger but, hey, it just looks great.
    Let me know if this works for you - it took me ages to figure this out!
    Best regards
    PostGuy40
    Imac 2.16Ghz intel dual core   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   17"

    Good info. I'll keep this in mind next time.

  • TS2681 quality issues with I pad 3, now on my 4th in 3 weeks

    Quality issues with the new Ipad 3 , now on my 4th  in 3 weeks ,  each time marks  / scraches in the metal case are evident,  not what i expect from apple , unable to e mail direct,  

    One of two things is happening.
    1) You have had an unusual run of bad luck. So, return it and try again.
    2) With all respect, you may be so picky, you'll never be satisfied.
    Matt

  • Recurring quality issues with HP Elitebook 6930p

    Good afternoon to all forumers,
    I am trying to find out if anyone besides me have the same recurring quality issues with HP Elitebook 6930p? Although these issues have all been resolved by HP. I find it very inconvenient since this is a business notebook and these issues have cause me a lot of down time and grievances. A list of my Elite book issues.
    Warped LCD panel causing the latch not to work. (1 time)
    Dead pixels on new LCD panel replacement (1 time).
    Deteriorated touch pad rubber left button, which I don't use. (1 time)
    Keyboard not working. (2 times)
    Screw holding the top sdie switch panel came off on one corner. Reason being, the screw holder cracked (1 time).
    Reading lack cover on the LCD panel cracked on its own. I rarely use this. (1 time).
    Notebook overheating. The cooling element not working properly. (1 time).
    Defective power adapter, loose contact at adapter  (1 time). Replaced within warranty period.
    I do not know whether to term this as` unlucky' or to say that today's HP business notebook has not got the `Quality' a business notebook should have. I have used other business notebook from HP, namely 2 models from the nx series but they are not as bad as the Elitebook except for the same high operating temperature issue.
     Is there any course of action that I can take up with HP Malaysia? Any advice is greatly appreciated.
    Thank you.
    -Keith CK Loo

    Hi, Keith:
    I have a 6930p and was leery about getting one, after reading this link below from the business support forum, but I only paid $499 for it brand new. I couldn't pass up a deal like that.
    http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/Notebook-HP-ProBook-Compaq-Slate/6930p-Quality-Issues/m-p/1066713#M1505...
    I heard that many of the issues you and the others that posted were improved/fixed by HP later on in production. My notebook was built in December of 2010, so it was pretty much the last of the line.
    I have not experienced any problems with mine thus far, after 8 months of light use.  I have tested every component at least once. I know the latch issue was fixed on later models.
    Paul

  • Image quality issues - Sony Handycam (MPEG) to iMovie / iDVD

    I have read through dozens of posts but the recommendations vary widely and am hoping I can get some guidance specific to my situation. The image quality I am getting from home movies I edit in iMovie11 and burn to DVD in iDVD are far inferior to the original material.
    I have a Sony DCR-TRV17. This camera is a little over 10 years old. It is a miniDV with 500 lines resolution, 680K gross pixels and uses MPEG. While not HD, the image quality is exceptional. The DVDs I used to create using my Sony Viao likewise looked fantastic. But the results I get from iMovie and iDVD are on par with VHS -- very poor, especially in low-light.
    I hope the issue is just the settings when I import, edit (iMovie) and share to iDVD. I generally use the default settings, and often alternate settings don't seem to be selectable. It also sounds from other posts like iMovie sacrifices quality for reduced file size and increased simplicity? I would appreciate help with the following:
    1) Please list the settings I should be adjusting from default when I  a) import, b) edit in iMovie11 and c) share to iDVD and burn -- and the recommended settings for each
    2) Is there a process I should be trying? Should I be creating test DVDs using different settings at each stage and then reviewing various setting combinations to find the best one?
    3) I will most probably buy an HD camcorder very soon, and plan to burn to Blue Rays. I have no problem with going ahead and buying Final Cut and an external drive to burn Blue Rays. Should I just go ahead and do it and get away from iMovie / iDVD entirely. Will Final Cut solve this issue for my old miniDVs without a whole lot of hair pulling? Or will I still have to tinker with a bunch of settings or convoluted processes to get it "right." I never had to tinker with settings on my Viao. Really expected Mac software to be more user friendly…
    Thanks very much for any help or advice!

    On Import you could try unchecking Optimize video and choose Full Size. Your disk space however will get eaten up incredibly quickly choosing these settings as each hour of video = 40GBytes of disk space. So be forewarned about how big those files will expand as they come off the MiniDV tapes.
    Another thing you will immediately see a difference in is how you move files from iMovie to iDVD. Share to iDVD while named in an intuitive way, is NOT the best way to get good quality DVDs out of iMovie. Instead you want to Share to Media Browser. Choose the Large Size setting. Then quit iMovie. Open iDVD, click the Media button, the Movies button. Find your project listed under the iMovie star icon and drag it into the iDVD project. Burn the Disc and see if you get a higher quality disk by Sharing to Media Browser instead of Share to iDVD.
    If you choose a Blu-Ray burner, also get a copy of Roxio Toast. The encoding to Blu-ray that Toast provides will be top notch and prevent you from making mistakes as the recordable Blu-ray disks are more expensive than DVDs. So every mistake will be expensive.

  • Quality issues with VGA port on Type 2504 docking station

    Hi,
    I see quality issues on the VGA output of the Type 2504 docking station with a T61. The monitor image is blurred, not much, but enough to be irritating. When I compare the DVI output with the VGA output on two equal NEC MultiSync LCD 2170NX monitors it is a clear difference. If I connect the LCD monitor to the VGA output of the T61 itself, the picture is clean. I have tried both monitors with different cables in different configurations and also adjusted monitors manually, and my conclusion is that it must be the VGA output of the 2504 that generates the un-sharpness. I have got several 2504 docking stations from the IT department to test and all attempts show the same unsharp picture on the LCD connected to the VGA port of any 2504. Recently a colleague got a new laptop and docking station. He also used DVI and VGA on the old setup and had no visible difference between the two monitors. His new setup is a different T but his new dock is also a 2504. Now he has clear difference between his monitors. He also tried several 2540 docks and cables but the difference is still present.
    The unsharpness is not immediately present when just looking at a dual head setup. But after a while it becomes tiresome to look at text, specially black on white, on the monitor connected to the VGA port. There is a slight shadow on the right side of all letters. When looking at non-aliased fonts, they look as if aliased on the VGA connected monitor. Already aliased fonts tend to "smear" and I have the unpleasant feeling that my eyes are not focusing correctly.
    My question is: Is there a different VGA DAC on the docking station, or are the analog signals just wired through from the laptop VGA DAC? Older IBM docks do not have this problem, we have a lot of them at work in dual head configuration with DVI + VGA to compare, and we only see this problem with the 2504.

    VGA is an analogue signal... so it can be affected by the quality of DAC chip used by the GPU associated electronics, the quality of connectors on the vga out and dock (that is why good analgoue audio equipment use gold plated stuffs) and the quality of copper wire and shiedling used in the cable (i.e. Low Oxygen Content Copper wire).
    The above is general description for all people to use <---- so please don't feel offended if i repeat something that is already said. 
    There is NO conversion electronics on the dock per se, they are just passthrough, so no conversion.
    I guess the problem lies with improper shielding somewhere. I have the same problem with my T61/60 and dock and my T40,41,42,43 on five different docks. 
    So i have ended up using lenovo usb2dvi converter on T61 and have two dvi output and bypassed the vga altogether. 
    Regards,
    Jin Li
    May this year, be the year of 'DO'!
    I am a volunteer, and not a paid staff of Lenovo or Microsoft

  • DVD Playback - Image Quality Issues...

    I'm curious to know if others are experience sub-par image quality when playing standard DVDs in the iMac with a 24" screen. The picture of the DVDs is sub-par compared to playback of the same DVD on a regular TV monitor. Also, playback is jumpy and or pixelated (looks like digitizing errors) despite the DVD being new and which plays back normally on a typical DVD player and TV monitor.
    Is anyone having similar issues? My computer is new, so this seems odd...

    Hi AM249
    Welcome to Apple Discussions
    SuperDrives are way more senitive that tray load players, is the DVD scrached or dirty?
    Dennis

  • SWF Export Image Quality Issue

    I'm having an issue with a flip eFlyer myself and a colleague are working on in InDesign CS4 and need some input. We've created a eFlyer with page curl transitions and exported the swf file. When viewing the swf however, the page images vary in quality depending on whether the page curl is moused over or not. For example, the swf file resolution appears somewhat low without a mouseover, however when I mouseover the page curl in the corners, the resolution of the file noticeably improves (ie the image becomes clearer and more legible to read). Can't figure out why this is the case. Any thoughts?

    I guess what´s happening "under the hood" is that flash player creates a bitmap copy of the page when ever user moused over, page curl effect is done with that bitmap, not with the actual page....
    I think you have couple of ways to improve your document´s quality
    1) prepare your images in photoshop, resize them to resolution 100ppi or even 120ppi, when you export your SWF, use Losless(do nothing) compression..
    2) Or use high resolution images and export your SWF with larger size, for instance heigth of 1000px. Go to Adobe Marketplace:
    http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/marketplace/index.cfm?event=marketplace.offering&offeringid=1 7503&marketplaceid=1
    Downoad and install eDokcer, open eDocManager AIR-software and browse your SWF to it and hit Publish Locally button, eDocManager creates you a SWF with user interface and shrinks your large SWF to smaller, then resolution gets better.
    You may use eDocManager for 3 days without license key... but that should be enough for making your flyer...
    I´m not sure if either of those tricks really solves your problem, but I think that way you get better quality anyway...

  • Image Gallery issues with Lightbox2 - please help!

    Hello there,
    I am using Lightbox2 image gallery.  The loading.gif and close.gif aren't showing up and I think there's an issue with the path in the lightbox.js file.  The loading and close gifs are located in the Images gallery so I changed the path in the lightbox.js file accordingly - I've gone through this many many times but they are still not showing up.
    Can anyone please help me?
    My website is: www.labellepetraie.com
    Here's where I downloaded the script from: http://www.huddletogether.com/projects/lightbox2/#how
    I have tried all the path combinations mentioned in their forum but to no avail.  What am I doing wrong?
    Thank you for any help you can offer to me.
    Regards!

    Interesting.  I've just looked at your scripts, and it would appear that you have blended two versions of lightbox2 on your page,.  Is that possible?  The lightbox.js file has no function called initLightbox() in it, whereas older versions do.  So, try changing this:
    window.onload = function(){ // use this instead of <body onload …>
         MM_preloadImages('../3websites/home4.jpg','../3web sites/amenities1.jpg','../3websites/inquiry1.jpg','../3websites/rates1.jpg','../ 3websites/photos1.jpg');
            initLightbox();
    to this:
    window.onload = function(){ // use this instead of <body onload …>
         MM_preloadImages('../3websites/home4.jpg','../3web sites/amenities1.jpg','../3websites/inquiry1.jpg','../3websites/rates1.jpg','../ 3websites/photos1.jpg');
            //initLightbox();
    to see if that works.  I think so.  Turns out the initLightbox() function call that we activated by fixing the code before is no longer needed by the lightbox2 script as of v2.04!  I see that it still tells you to put that function call in the body tag, but i think that is wrong (which is very weird to say, can I really be right???).  If you look at the example page online you'll see that he uses this body tag:
    <body>
    and there are no onload's anywhere. 
    Let me know.
    E. Michael Brandt
    www.divahtml.com
    www.divahtml.com/products/scripts_dreamweaver_extensions.php
    Standards-compliant scripts and Dreamweaver Extensions
    www.valleywebdesigns.com/vwd_Vdw.asp
    JustSo PictureWindow
    JustSo PhotoAlbum, et alia

  • Image quality issue in ACR

    Hi, Can anyone help me?
    I have been using ACR for a while now as a professional photographer, however I have recently started using Alamy picture library. They rejected all my submissions on quality grounds, as they 'lacked definition'. In consulation with another photographer, we have tracked the problem to ACR; the images appear perfect on his mac, and they also appear perfect on mine when I use the Nikon Software. The same quality issue appears in lightroom as well, therefore it is Adobe related. The Sharpening settings are as per ACR default.
    I am using CS3 and ACR 4.6; Some have suggested upgrading to CS5, however surely I shouldnt need to do this, as the Nikon D3 was brought out before I started using CS3, so it should work?
    Please please any help would be appreciated as this problem is driving me insane; I currently have to open all of my RAW files in the Nikon software and save as TIFF to then open in CS3, rather than using the more simple and logical workflow.
    Thanks,
    Rob

    Click the little fly-out menu icon at the upper-right and choose Save New Camera Raw Defaults.
    But be careful, any setting you have changed from default will be saved, so you could inadvertently save a particular color balance setting (instead of As Shot) for example, and that wouldn't be good.
    mijbil250456 wrote:
    I am using CS3 and ACR 4.6; Some have suggested upgrading to CS5, however surely I shouldnt need to do this, as the Nikon D3 was brought out before I started using CS3, so it should work?
    One thing I'd like to add that goes to this comment that you made in the original post:  There's not just one result that can be made from a raw file.  The quality of conversion results is continunuing to improve as Adobe refines their algorithms and more powerful computers are being built to run them. 
    The quality of conversions of the very same raw files from Photoshop CS5, using the PV2010 conversion process can indeed be superior to that from Photoshop CS3.
    In turn, the quality of conversions from Photoshop CS6 can be better than that of conversions from Photoshop CS5.
    We are seeing real improvements to this technology before our very eyes.
    -Noel

  • Image Quality Issues from FCE to iDVD

    I've been attempting to take a 16 minute video shot in DV to a DVD and have been disappointed with the results. Using Final Cut Express, I've tried every codec but have found the image quality to be quite a bit less than the original DV footage. Also having a difficult time retaining the original 4:3 aspect ratio of the footage, despite specifying NTSC 4:3. When converting the footage to a Quicktime movie, the quality of the movie appears fine when played back on the Mac, but degraded when the final DVD is burned. Haven't used iDVD much, so the issue may lie there, but it's hard for me to believe that such a relatively small amount of footage would require so much compression that the final DVD image would show this much degradation from the DV footage.
    Is there some magic combination of codec and size that I'm missing when converting to Quicktime?

    Your FCE Easy Set should be DV NTSC.
    Your FCE Sequence Settings should also be DV NTSC.
    Export a QuickTime Movie using Current Settings, Self Contained.
    Bring that file into iDVD where it will be converted internally to MPEG 2.

  • Flash in Premiere Elements Image Quality issue

    Hello,
    I've decided now that I am going to create animated films in Flash and then edit them in Premiere Elements. the problem is, is that when I export it from Flash to Premiere Elements the Image quality is detiereoreted (i.e fuzzy, blurry, out of focus, general ugly to look at). I first realised that I couldnt use an swf file in Premiere and isntead I should use an AVI. So I did. Problem is I'm still having the same problem. the Image quality is still terrible and doesn't equal up to the origonal image quality. And then tried Uncompressing it and all that did is make the video clip jump over about 80 frames and still the image quality is terrible. Is their one little thing that I'm doing wrong or Am I altogether not getting this right.
    Programs I'm using:
    Macromedia Flash MX 2004
    Adobe Premiere Elements 3.0
    Adobe Premiere Elements 7.0 (currently not working)

    The MS DV CODEC should be installed on your system already. Whether Flash can Export to it could still be an issue. I'll have to check my version of Flash (think that it's Studio 8, but I've had it around from version 2) to see what all of the options are.
    I've been handed many Flash animations that were Exported as .MOV with the Animation CODEC, and these have edited fine.
    Other than the huge file sizes, AVI [Uncompressed] should work fine too. You might have resource issues, but that would depend on your system, more than on your NLE. I've used these with no issues many times.
    Another likely candidate would be the free Lagarith Lossless CODEC. I use it for intermediate transfer and it edits fine in PrPro. I would assume that it would be the same in PrE, but cannot verify this.
    On Monday, I'll be on my workstation with Flash and will tell you the exact version, plus the Export options available.
    Good luck,
    Hunt

Maybe you are looking for