Flash Performance Test

I am very particular with my flash applications efficiency and write code as efficient as possible (my obsessive compulsiveness tells me to). But i do not know how exactly i can test the efficiency in a numerical way such as the speed test application in http://www.greensock.com/tweening-speed-test/ How can i get the FPS rate at any time of my SWF like in that link?

Oh i think i figured out the algorithm:
onEnterFrame = function()
   var nFrameRate:Number;
   var nTimeDiff:Number = nTime - nPrevTime;
   nPrevTime = nTime;
   nTime = getTimer()/1000;
   nFrameRate = Math.round(1/nTimeDiff);
But it flickers too much so i'll try to find a way to place a tolerance value so it becomes more legible value.

Similar Messages

Flash Performance testing

Hi All
I am Newly using Flash player into my web application, I want
to check Flash performance in the web application
Can you help me by listing some GUI tools that supports Flash
Performance testing?
Thanks In advance
Rajesh

I agree with having the developer test on the lowest config
PC we have, which they currently perform. But, we have a seperate
group that performs Performance testing on all web applications and
they are looking for a tool. They currently use a combination of
Rational and Mercury products.

Performance testing using Adobe flash 9.0

Does anyone know a way to Performance test an application
that uses adobe flash player using an Automated tool such as Silk
Performer? I need to simulate 1000 virtual users streaming video
content. Silk Performer currently does not support Adobe flash. It
has support only for Real and Windows media player. Is there a way
of getting around this. Does anyone know how Adobe tests its flash
player ?

Please try the following. If you have questions or get stuck,
send me a 'private message' with your full name and contact info.
The number one reason that the ActiveX installer fails to
install on IE are due to incorrect permissions in the system
registry. We have solved hundreds of these Windows system
permissions with Microsoft’s SubInACL tool.
Note: This is strictly for Windows IE, these issues do not
occur on other browsers such as Firefox.
www.firefox.com
To fix these Windows system registry permission conflicts you
can use Microsoft’s SubInACL tool.
Warning: The following solution involves the Windows System
Registry. Editing or manipulating the registry incorrectly can
result in serious system damage which may require re-installation
of the operating system. If you are not comfortable editing the
registry, then take your system to a professional. If you choose to
proceed, then it is essential that you create a complete system
backup and a Windows System Restore Point before proceeding.
Please download Microsoft’s tool to your desktop.
http://www.supportflash.com/reset_min.zip
1. Login as the User that has the incorrect permissions in
the system registry
2. unzip the “reset_minimal.cmd” and the
“subinacl.exe” to the desktop
*** Make sure both files are on the desktop
3. Close out all applications
4. Run the “reset.cmd” file
5. It will open a DOS like terminal and start running through
registry keys
6. When it is finished it will say “press any key to
continue”
7. At this point you can download the latest Flash Player
from here:
www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer
Important Note: These online forums are for user-to-user
discussions of Adobe products, and are not an official customer
support channel for Adobe. If you require direct assistance, or
prefer to contact Adobe support staff directly, please contact
Adobe support.
http://www.adobe.com/support/contact/

Flash Performance

In all the test I've done, with Flash 9 and 10, it just seems that Flash videos just can't keep up as they can in Windows. Do you think it's a driver or flash problem? It's extremely discouraging, and making me think to give up Linux for Windows because of many example of poor drivers and support for Linux from big business

sam wrote:
Flash performance is dependent on the flash player and the video driver your computer uses. Flash player is generally slower in linux than in windows. This is probably due to adobe's priorities. Heck, for a long time linux only had flash 7 while windows had flash 9 and many sites used flash 8. It was a grim time in linux history... Having said that, the performance difference between windows and Linux versions should still allow for relatively smooth video animations, if it wasn't for the drivers.
I'm not sure if this is because flash now tries to use your video card to speed up rendering or it is because of bad video card drivers, but the drivers have an IMMENSE impact on video. I have an ati card, and ati has been undergoing a change of philosophy toward linux and this is impacting their drivers. This usually bring about good change, like AIGLX; however, it introduces many bugs that affect video performance. The current ati driver is 8.6, however I'm still using 8.4 because 8.5 and 8.6 make youtube videos UNWATCHABLE on my dual core. The 8.4 driver is slightly sluggish, but at least I can watch flash videos.
The performance of flash videos is indicative of the general performance of flash on the platform. If you dual boot and want to see this difference, you can try a simple video like youtube.com. Most likely this will work equally well in both OSs, where you will 'likely' find a difference is HD videos on dailymotion (unless you have a powerful video card).
The good news about all of this is that the future of flash looks very promising. Adobe finally treats linux with the same respect as windows, and is apparent by the simultaneous release of flash 10. Ati is breaking milestones with their video drivers, and the open source ati driver will eventually surpass the stability and performance of propriety drivers.
keep believing it then

N82 Flash Performance

So how does the phone's flash perform its operation comparing to other hi end nokia camphones and other tops like k850i etc? Is it that outstanding or so so..?Message Edited by korngear on 30-Nov-200709:26 PM

Ahem..
Well. Say you sittin in a literally non lit, pitch black room that's 13-15 feet in length. Take a picture with this 82 and it's like someone switched on a neon light in the room. I never knew I'd smile at a picture like this. Sure pic quality CAN be better, but the flasher kills off some of the quality disappointment. I wore glasses in college and only wear'em when I watch TV, till today. Without wearin' 'em now and lookin at pix compared betwwen this handset and the k850i.. I'd say what I see. About 6-70% brighter pix from the 82. Pic quality.. I don't know.. Hmmm.. And shanapps.. The red I don't light blinds the freak outta anybody just as much or more. ok ok.. its flash.. It's just perfect for the mobile phone age we're in, but for right now. Honestly, I'm satisfied. Alot!
Peace..
tim aka sal aka moee here.
Does Nokia have product Beta-Testing nowadays?

UI performance testing of pivot table

Hi,
I was wondering if anyone could direct me to a tool that I can use to do performance testing on a pivot table. I am populating a pivot table(declaratively) with a data source of over 100,000 cells and I need to record the browser rendering time of the pivot table using 50 or so parallel threads(requests). I tried running performance tests using JMeter, but that didn't help.
This is what I tried so far with JMeter:
I deployed the application in the integratedweblogicserver and specify the Url to hit in JMeter ( http://127.0.0.1:7101/PivotTableSample-ViewController-context-root/faces/Sample) and added a response assertion for the response code 200. Although I am able to hit the url successfully, the response I get is a javascript with a message that says "This is the loopback script to process the url before the real page loads. It introduces a separate round trip". When I checked in firebug, it looks like request redirect of some sort happens from this javascript to another Url (with some randomly generated parameters) which then returns the html response of the pivot table. I am unable to hit that Url directly as I get a message saying "session expired". It looks like a redirect happens from the first request and then session is created for that request and a redirect occurs.
I am able to check the browser rendering time of the pivot table in firebug (.net tab), but that is only for a single request. I'd appreciate it if anyone could guide me on this.
Thanks
Naveen

I found the link below that explains configuration of JMeter for performance testing of ADF applications(Although I couldn't find a solution to figure out the browser rendering time for parallel threads).
http://one-size-doesnt-fit-all.blogspot.com/2010/04/configuring-apache-jmeter-specifically.html
Edited by: Naveen Ramanathan on Oct 3, 2010 10:24 AM

Performance testing of servlets / beans / jsp ?

Hi. I'd like to performance test my applications, anyone have a clue on what software to use?
I use Fort� for Java CE 3 as the IDE and TomCat 3.23 as the servlet / jsp container.
Hopefully there are some opensource tools to use for this?
Regards,
Chris

You can precompile JSP's, this removes the small hickup when they are requested the first time (making the server translate and compile them). Check the documentation of your specific web/application server on how to do this.
Otherwise:
- buy better hardware
- use a better application server
- make sure your network is properly configured (so packets don't get routed around the network four times before they reach their destination for example)
- make sure your program logic doesn't create bottlenecks such as
unnecessary HTTP requests, redundant loops, etc.
- optimize your database access, use connection pooling
- optimize your database queries. Create indexes, make sure the SQL queries themselves aren't doing unnecessary trips around the database, etc.

Can Web Performance Test work on AJAX or Javascript Project which will show only one URL for all the pages?

Hi there,
I'm working on testing a AJAX and JavaScript Project which has several pages but all in the same URL. I need to test some attribute on the page or parameter past by AJAX or Javascript. Can Web Performance Test work to get what I want?
Thanks,

Hello,
Thank you for your post.
Web performance test is used to test if a server responses correctly and the response is consistent with what we expected. And we test the response speed, the stability and scalability.
The Web Performance Test Recorder records both AJAX requests and requests that were submitted from JavaScript, but
web test does not execute JavaScript. I am afraid that you can’t use web test to test parameter past by AJAX or JavaScript.
Please see:
Web Performance Test Engine Overview
About JavaScript and ActiveX Controls in Web Performance Tests
From the first link, “Client-side scripting that sets parameter values or results in additional HTTP requests, such as AJAX, does affect the load on the server and might require you to manually modify the Web Performance Test to simulate the scripting.”
If you want to execute the function typically performed by script in web test, you need to accomplish it in coded web performance test or a web performance test plugin. Please see:
How to: Create a Coded Web Performance Test
How to: Create a Web Performance Test Plug-In
I am not sure what the ‘some attribute on the page’ is. If you mean that you want to test those controls on the page, you can do coded UI test, which can test that the user interface for an application functions correctly. The coded UI test performs actions
on the user interface controls for an application and verifies that the correct controls are displayed with the correct values. You can refer to this article for detailed information about code UI test:
Verifying Code by Using Coded User Interface Tests
Best regards,
Amanda Zhu [MSFT]
MSDN Community Support | Feedback to us
Develop and promote your apps in Windows Store
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.

Performance Testing - Upgrade from 4.6B to ECC6.0

Hi,
We are doing an upgrade from SAP 4.6B to ECC6.0. I would like to know what would be the best approach for doing a performance test in an upgrade project. More specifically,
1. What are the main components that need to be tested for performance?
2. What are the important transaction codes/external applications (if any) that can be used to do performance testing in both 4.6B and ECC6.0? (ST05 or ST30 or something else?)
3. Any best practice recommended by SAP for doing performance tests?
Thanks in Advance,
Reena

> We are doing an upgrade from SAP 4.6B to ECC6.0. I would like to know what would be the best approach for doing a performance test in an upgrade project. More specifically,
>
> 1. What are the main components that need to be tested for performance?
Those components you use.
> 2. What are the important transaction codes/external applications (if any) that can be used to do performance testing in both 4.6B and ECC6.0? (ST05 or ST30 or something else?)
What is "important" for you?
Markus

Log file sync top event during performance test -av 36ms

Hi,
During the performance test for our product before deployment into product i see "log file sync" on top with Avg wait (ms) being 36 which i feel is too high.
                                                           Avg
                                                          wait   % DB
Event                                 Waits     Time(s)   (ms)   time Wait Class
log file sync                       208,327       7,406     36   46.6 Commit
direct path write                   646,833       3,604      6   22.7 User I/O
DB CPU                                            1,599          10.1
direct path read temp             1,321,596         619      0    3.9 User I/O
log buffer space                      4,161         558    134    3.5 ConfiguratAlthough testers are not complaining about the performance of the appplication , we ,DBAs, are expected to be proactive about the any bad signals from DB.
I am not able to figure out why "log file sync" is having such slow response.
Below is the snapshot from the load profile.
              Snap Id      Snap Time      Sessions Curs/Sess
Begin Snap:    108127 16-May-13 20:15:22       105       6.5
End Snap:    108140 16-May-13 23:30:29       156       8.9
   Elapsed:              195.11 (mins)
   DB Time:              265.09 (mins)
Cache Sizes                       Begin        End
~~~~~~~~~~~                  ---------- ----------
               Buffer Cache:     1,168M     1,136M Std Block Size:         8K
           Shared Pool Size:     1,120M     1,168M      Log Buffer:    16,640K
Load Profile              Per Second    Per Transaction   Per Exec   Per Call
~~~~~~~~~~~~         ---------------    --------------- ---------- ----------
      DB Time(s):                1.4                0.1       0.02       0.01
       DB CPU(s):                0.1                0.0       0.00       0.00
       Redo size:          607,512.1           33,092.1
   Logical reads:            3,900.4              212.5
   Block changes:            1,381.4               75.3
Physical reads:              134.5                7.3
Physical writes:              134.0                7.3
      User calls:              145.5                7.9
          Parses:               24.6                1.3
     Hard parses:                7.9                0.4
W/A MB processed:          915,418.7           49,864.2
          Logons:                0.1                0.0
        Executes:               85.2                4.6
       Rollbacks:                0.0                0.0
    Transactions:               18.4Some of the top background wait events:
^LBackground Wait Events       DB/Inst: Snaps: 108127-108140
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
                                                             Avg
                                        %Time Total Wait    wait    Waits   % bg
Event                             Waits -outs   Time (s)    (ms)     /txn   time
log file parallel write         208,563     0      2,528      12      1.0   66.4
db file parallel write            4,264     0        785     184      0.0   20.6
Backup: sbtbackup                     1     0        516 516177      0.0   13.6
control file parallel writ        4,436     0         97      22      0.0    2.6
log file sequential read          6,922     0         95      14      0.0    2.5
Log archive I/O                   6,820     0         48       7      0.0    1.3
os thread startup                   432     0         26      60      0.0     .7
Backup: sbtclose2                     1     0         10   10094      0.0     .3
db file sequential read           2,585     0          8       3      0.0     .2
db file single write                560     0          3       6      0.0     .1
log file sync                        28     0          1      53      0.0     .0
control file sequential re       36,326     0          1       0      0.2     .0
log file switch completion            4     0          1     207      0.0     .0
buffer busy waits                     5     0          1     116      0.0     .0
LGWR wait for redo copy             924     0          1       1      0.0     .0
log file single write                56     0          1       9      0.0     .0
Backup: sbtinfo2                      1     0          1     500      0.0     .0During a previous perf test , things didnt look this bad for "log file sync. Few sections from the comparision report(awrddprt.sql)
{code}
Workload Comparison
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1st Per Sec 2nd Per Sec %Diff 1st Per Txn 2nd Per Txn %Diff
DB time: 0.78 1.36 74.36 0.02 0.07 250.00
CPU time: 0.18 0.14 -22.22 0.00 0.01 100.00
Redo size: 573,678.11 607,512.05 5.90 15,101.84 33,092.08 119.13
Logical reads: 4,374.04 3,900.38 -10.83 115.14 212.46 84.52
Block changes: 1,593.38 1,381.41 -13.30 41.95 75.25 79.38
Physical reads: 76.44 134.54 76.01 2.01 7.33 264.68
Physical writes: 110.43 134.00 21.34 2.91 7.30 150.86
User calls: 197.62 145.46 -26.39 5.20 7.92 52.31
Parses: 7.28 24.55 237.23 0.19 1.34 605.26
Hard parses: 0.00 7.88 100.00 0.00 0.43 100.00
Sorts: 3.88 4.90 26.29 0.10 0.27 170.00
Logons: 0.09 0.08 -11.11 0.00 0.00 0.00
Executes: 126.69 85.19 -32.76 3.34 4.64 38.92
Transactions: 37.99 18.36 -51.67
First Second Diff
1st 2nd
Event Wait Class Waits Time(s) Avg Time(ms) %DB time Event Wait Class Waits Time(s) Avg Time
(ms) %DB time
SQL*Net more data from client Network 2,133,486 1,270.7 0.6 61.24 log file sync Commit 208,355 7,407.6
35.6 46.57
CPU time N/A 487.1 N/A 23.48 direct path write User I/O 646,849 3,604.7
5.6 22.66
log file sync Commit 99,459 129.5 1.3 6.24 log file parallel write System I/O 208,564 2,528.4
12.1 15.90
log file parallel write System I/O 100,732 126.6 1.3 6.10 CPU time N/A 1,599.3
N/A 10.06
SQL*Net more data to client Network 451,810 103.1 0.2 4.97 db file parallel write System I/O 4,264 784.7 1
84.0 4.93
-direct path write User I/O 121,044 52.5 0.4 2.53 -SQL*Net more data from client Network 7,407,435 279.7
0.0 1.76
-db file parallel write System I/O 986 22.8 23.1 1.10 -SQL*Net more data to client Network 2,714,916 64.6
0.0 0.41
{code}
*To sum it sup:
1. Why is the IO response getting such an hit during the new perf test? Please suggest*
2. Does the number of DB writer impact "log file sync" wait event? We have only one DB writer as the number of cpu on the host is only 4
{code}
select *from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
CORE 11.1.0.7.0 Production
TNS for HPUX: Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
{code}
Please let me know if you would like to see any other stats.
Edited by: Kunwar on May 18, 2013 2:20 PM

1. A snapshot interval of 3 hours always generates meaningless results
Below are some details from the 1 hour interval AWR report.
Platform                         CPUs Cores Sockets Memory(GB)
HP-UX IA (64-bit)                   4     4       3      31.95
              Snap Id      Snap Time      Sessions Curs/Sess
Begin Snap:    108129 16-May-13 20:45:32       140       8.0
End Snap:    108133 16-May-13 21:45:53       150       8.8
   Elapsed:               60.35 (mins)
   DB Time:              140.49 (mins)
Cache Sizes                       Begin        End
~~~~~~~~~~~                  ---------- ----------
               Buffer Cache:     1,168M     1,168M Std Block Size:         8K
           Shared Pool Size:     1,120M     1,120M      Log Buffer:    16,640K
Load Profile              Per Second    Per Transaction   Per Exec   Per Call
~~~~~~~~~~~~         ---------------    --------------- ---------- ----------
      DB Time(s):                2.3                0.1       0.03       0.01
       DB CPU(s):                0.1                0.0       0.00       0.00
       Redo size:          719,553.5           34,374.6
   Logical reads:            4,017.4              191.9
   Block changes:            1,521.1               72.7
Physical reads:              136.9                6.5
Physical writes:              158.3                7.6
      User calls:              167.0                8.0
          Parses:               25.8                1.2
     Hard parses:                8.9                0.4
W/A MB processed:          406,220.0           19,406.0
          Logons:                0.1                0.0
        Executes:               88.4                4.2
       Rollbacks:                0.0                0.0
    Transactions:               20.9
Top 5 Timed Foreground Events
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                                                           Avg
                                                          wait   % DB
Event                                 Waits     Time(s)   (ms)   time Wait Class
log file sync                        73,761       6,740     91   80.0 Commit
log buffer space                      3,581         541    151    6.4 Configurat
DB CPU                                              348           4.1
direct path write                   238,962         241      1    2.9 User I/O
direct path read temp               487,874         174      0    2.1 User I/O
Background Wait Events       DB/Inst: Snaps: 108129-108133
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
                                                             Avg
                                        %Time Total Wait    wait    Waits   % bg
Event                             Waits -outs   Time (s)    (ms)     /txn   time
log file parallel write          61,049     0      1,891      31      0.8   87.8
db file parallel write            1,590     0        251     158      0.0   11.6
control file parallel writ        1,372     0         56      41      0.0    2.6
log file sequential read          2,473     0         50      20      0.0    2.3
Log archive I/O                   2,436     0         20       8      0.0     .9
os thread startup                   135     0          8      60      0.0     .4
db file sequential read             668     0          4       6      0.0     .2
db file single write                200     0          2       9      0.0     .1
log file sync                         8     0          1     152      0.0     .1
log file single write                20     0          0      21      0.0     .0
control file sequential re       11,218     0          0       0      0.1     .0
buffer busy waits                     2     0          0     161      0.0     .0
direct path write                     6     0          0      37      0.0     .0
LGWR wait for redo copy             380     0          0       0      0.0     .0
log buffer space                      1     0          0      89      0.0     .0
latch: cache buffers lru c            3     0          0       1      0.0     .0     2 The log file sync is a result of commit --> you are committing too often, maybe even every individual record.
Thanks for explanation. +Actually my question is WHY is it so slow (avg wait of 91ms)+3 Your IO subsystem hosting the online redo log files can be a limiting factor.
We don't know anything about your online redo log configuration
Below is my redo log configuration.
    GROUP# STATUS TYPE    MEMBER                                                       IS_
         1         ONLINE /oradata/fs01/PERFDB1/redo_1a.log                           NO
         1         ONLINE /oradata/fs02/PERFDB1/redo_1b.log                           NO
         2         ONLINE /oradata/fs01/PERFDB1/redo_2a.log                           NO
         2         ONLINE /oradata/fs02/PERFDB1/redo_2b.log                           NO
         3         ONLINE /oradata/fs01/PERFDB1/redo_3a.log                           NO
         3         ONLINE /oradata/fs02/PERFDB1/redo_3b.log                           NO
6 rows selected.
04:13:14 perf_monitor@PERFDB1> col FIRST_CHANGE# for 999999999999999999
04:13:26 perf_monitor@PERFDB1> select *from v$log;
    GROUP#    THREAD# SEQUENCE#      BYTES    MEMBERS ARC STATUS                 FIRST_CHANGE# FIRST_TIME
         1          1      40689 524288000          2 YES INACTIVE              13026185905545 18-MAY-13 01:00
         2          1      40690 524288000          2 YES INACTIVE              13026185931010 18-MAY-13 03:32
         3          1      40691 524288000          2 NO CURRENT               13026185933550 18-MAY-13 04:00Edited by: Kunwar on May 18, 2013 2:46 PM

Need to install Visual C++ 2010 in MDT before performance testing.

Hi all,
I'm in a situation in which I'm deploying a laptop over MDT, and the display driver is captured by MDT fine. However, upon initial boot after installing the OS, I come across this error when running WINSAT.exe; "The program can't start because MSVCR100.dll
is missing from your computer. Try reinstalling the program to fix the problem." This isn't the first report I've seen of ATI drivers triggering this, but I'm stuck with it regardless.
This is attributed to a component of Visual C++ 2010 not being installed. (It's not preinstalled in our capture, and I'm trying to avoid having to do that again.)
Being that we're a 0-touch organization when imaging, I need a way to remedy this. I'm currently trying to run the install, 'vcredist_x86.exe /q:a' from "run a command line" (sourced on the server's C:\ drive) before the performance tests,
but I can't find a proper place to put this command at in the task sequence. Is this even a viable method? Is there a method to skip WINSAT.exe pre-boot? My initial tests with this aren't working.
Any advice or pointers appreciated!

Hi,
Normally I think WinSAT is only relevant when deploying the image to your targeted computers (hardware). So why not integrate Visual C++ components into your reference image?
At the customer I'm currently working for we also put all our Visual C++ installations in the so called Build image.
I have provided a list with the install commands for the various programs.
Visual C++ 2005 SP1 ATL Security Update x64
msiexec /i "vcredist.msi" /qb
Visual C++ 2005 SP1 ATL Security Update x86
msiexec /i "vcredist.msi" /qb
Visual C++ 2005 SP1 MFC Security Update x64
msiexec /i "vcredist.msi" /qb
Visual C++ 2005 SP1 MFC Security Update x86
msiexec /i "vcredist.msi" /qb
Visual C++ 2008 SP1 ATL Security Update x64
install.exe /q
Visual C++ 2008 SP1 ATL Security Update x86
install.exe /q
Visual C++ 2008 SP1 MFC Security Update x64
install.exe /q
Visual C++ 2008 SP1 MFC Security Update x86
install.exe /q
Visual_C_2005_SP1_x64_8_0_56336_EN_M1
msiexec /i "vcredist.msi" /qb
Visual_C_2005_SP1_x64_8_0_59192_EN_M1
msiexec /i "vcredist.msi" /qb
Visual_C_2005_SP1_x86_8_0_50727_42_EN_M1
msiexec /i "vcredist.msi" /qb
Visual_C_2005_SP1_x86_8_0_59193_EN_M1
msiexec /i "vcredist.msi" /qb
Visual_C_2008_SP1_x64_9_0_30729_17_EN_M1
msiexec /i "vc_red.msi" /qb
Visual_C_2008_SP1_x64_9_0_30729_4148_EN_M1
msiexec /i "vc_red.msi" /qb
Visual_C_2008_SP1_x86_9_0_210022_EN_M1
install.exe /q
Visual_C_2008_SP1_x86_9_0_30729_17_EN_M1
msiexec /i "vc_red.msi" /qb
Visual_C_2008_SP1_x86_9_0_30729_4148_EN_M1
msiexec /i "vc_red.msi" /qb
Visual_C_2010_x64_10_0_40219_EN_M1
msiexec.exe /i "vc_red.msi" /qb
Visual_C_2010_x86_10_0_40219_EN_M1
msiexec.exe /i "vc_red.msi" /qb
Trying to install Visual C++ and than run WinSAT post OS installation will not work.
If this post is helpful please click "Mark for answer", thanks! Kind regards

How to setup the environment for doing the Performance Testing?

Hi,
We are planning to start the performance testing for iProcurement Product, Max number of user we are going to use 1000. For this simulation, what are all basic setups need to do for Application Tier, Database Tier,etc... Can anyone suggest what is procedure to setup environment depending upon the load?

User Guides for thee rv120W are here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/csbr/rv220w/quick_start/guide/rv220w_qsg.pdf
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/csbr/rv120w/administration/guide/rv120w_admin.pdf
and theres some more stuff over on my site:
http://www.linksysinfo.org/index.php?forums/cisco-small-business-routers-and-vpn-solutions.49/

FORMS CRASHES (FRM-92101) ON AS 10.1.2.0.2 DURING LOAD PERFORMANCE TESTING

Hiya
We have been doing Load Performance Testing using testing tool QALoad on our Forms 10g application. After about 56 virtual users(sessions) have logged-in into our application, if a new user tries to log-in into our application, the Forms crashes. As soon as we encounter the FRM-92101 error, no more new forms session are able to start.
The Load Testing software start up each process very quickly, about every 10 seconds.
The very first form that appears is the login form of our application. So before the login screen appears, we get FRM-92101 error message.
However, those users who have already logged-in into our application, they are able to carry on their tasks.
We are using Application Server 10g 10.1.2.0.2. I have checked the status on Application Server through Oracle Enterprise Manager Console. The OC4J Instance is up and running. Also, server's configuration is pretty good. It is running on 2 CPUs (AMD Opteron 3GHz) and has 32GB of memory. The memory used by those 56 sessions is less than 3GB.
The Applicatin Server is running on a Microsoft Windows Server 2003 64bit Enterprise Edition.
Any help will be much appreciated.
Cheers
Mayur

Hi Shekhawat
In Windows Registry go to
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\SubSystems
In the right hand side panel, you will find String Value as Windows. Now double click on it (Windows). In the pop up window you will see a string similar to the following one:
%SystemRoot%\system32\csrss.exe ObjectDirectory=\Windows SharedSection=1024,20480,768 Windows=On SubSystemType=Windows ServerDll=basesrv,1 ServerDll=winsrv:UserServerDllInitialization,3 ServerDll=winsrv:ConServerDllInitialization,2 ProfileControl=Off MaxRequestThreads=16
Now if you read it carefully in the above string, you will find this parameter
SharedSection=1024,20480,768
Here SharedSection specifies the system and desktop heaps using the following format:
SharedSection=xxxx,yyyy,zzzz
The default values are 1024,3072,512
All the values are in Kilobytes (KB)
xxxx = System-wide Heapsize. There is no need to modify this value.
yyyy = IO Desktop Heapsize. This is the heap for memory objects in the IO Desktop.
zzzz = Non-IO Desktop Heapsize. This is the heap for memory objects in the Non-IO Desktop.
On our server the values were as follows :
1024,20480,768
We changed the size of Non-IO desktop heapsize from 768 to 5112. With 5112 KB we managed to test our application for upto 495 virtual users.
Cheers
Mayur

Regarding performance test

Hi
i need to know how the performance testing is done for Hyperion essbase and planning?
I would be great help ............
Thanks
lakshmi

Hi
i need to know how the performance testing is done for Hyperion essbase and planning?
I would be great help ............
Thanks
lakshmi

Using Test Setting file to run web performance tests in different environments

Hello,
I have a set of web performance tests that I want to be able to run in different environments.
Currently I have csv file containing the url of the load balancer of the particular environment I want to run the load test containing the web performance tests in, and to run it in a different environment I just edit this csv file.
Is it possible to use the test settings file to point the web performance tests at a particular environment?
I am using VSTS 2012 Ultimate.
Thanks

Instead of using the testsettings I suggest using the "Parameterize web servers" command (found via context menu on the web test, or via one of the icons). The left hand column then suggests context parameter names for the parameterised web server
URLs. It should be possible to use data source entries instead. You may need to wrap the data source accesses in doubled curly braces if editing via the "Parameterize web servers" window.
Regards
Adrian

Flash Performance Test

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for