Flexconnect AP(Local Switching) Wireless clients are not able communicate eachother

Hi,
  Scenario :  We are deployed the WLC in Corparate Office and Access Points are placed in Branch Office with FlexConnect Local Switching mode.
In this case, I am not able to Ping the Wireless clients eachother . Peer to Peer Block Option also Disabled.
Some time Wireless clients Ping eachother & some times not. Both Wireless clients  are associated with Same AP & Same WLAN SSID.
Please help me urgent ..
Devices :
1)WLC 2500 series , Software 7.2
2)Cisco 1400 series APs
3)CISCO ACS server for AAA authentication
Regards,
Shanmugam Nachimuthu

Hi Shanmugam,
Please apply following steps to configure P2P setting for WLAN:
Step 1 Choose WLANs to open the WLANs page.
Step 2 Click the ID number of the WLAN for which you want to configure peer-to-peer blocking.
Step 3 Choose the Advanced tab to open the WLANs > Edit (Advanced) page.
Step 4 Choose one of the following options from the P2P Blocking drop-down list:
• Disabled — Disables peer-to-peer blocking and bridges traffic locally within the controller whenever possible. This is the default value.
NOTE: Traffic is never bridged across VLANs in the controller.
• Drop—Causes the controller to discard the packets.
• Forward - Upstream — causes the packets to be forwarded on the upstream VLAN. The device above the controller decides what action to take regarding the packets.
NOTE: To enable peer-to-peer blocking on a WLAN configured for FlexConnect local switching, select Drop from the P2P Blocking drop-down list and select the FlexConnect Local Switching check box.
Step 5 Click Apply to commit your changes.
Step 6 Click Save Configuration to save your changes.
Thanks,
Prashant Gondaliya

Similar Messages

  • I paid early termination fee two months ago to Verizon and am now out of the country. Am trying to unlock the phone but the local guys say they are not able to. I see from the blog here that iPhone 5 comes unlocked. Is it true?? Do I still have to unlock.

    I paid early termination fee two months ago to Verizon and am now out of the country. Am trying to unlock the phone but the local guys say they are not able to. I see from the blog here that iPhone 5 comes unlocked. Is it true?? Do I still have to unlock. How do I go about it?

    Thank you for reaching out to us, Texasman. Sad to see that
    you have left the VZW family, but it is definitely awesome to be able to
    travel! Regarding your iPhone 5, the phone is unlocked for international usage.
    Just need an active local SIM card that is compatible with your iPhone. Your local provider
    may need to configure some settings under Cellular, but it should pick up signal. Just in
    case, make sure that Settings>Cellular>Roaming>Voice & Data are
    active.
    NicandroN_VZW
    Follow us on twitter @VZWSupport

  • ADRMS::- Clients are not able to open document which permission were restricted by using ADRMS!

    Infrastructure:- (i) One Sql Server 2005 running on Windows server 2003 SP2 for RMS Database Storage.
                             (ii) ADDC & ADCS (no web enrollment) running on Windows server 2003 SP2. (FFL & DFL set to 2003)
                             (iii) ADRMS Running on Windows Server 2008.
                             (iv) Clients are using either Windows 7  with Office2010 pro or Windows 8 with Office 2013.
    Question: Users are able to connect ADRMS Server and restrict permission to their documents without any issue. BUT CANNOT open the restricted document even by the owner/administrator. Whenever they try to open restricted docs a message appears " Cannot
    configure your computer for Information Right Management at this time. Contact your administrator if this problem continues. "
    I checked > 'rms.company.com' is added to local intranet site using IE.
    So far I think clients computers are not able to retrieve the rms url.
    Kindly, suggest how should I approach to the solution.
    NB:- I am  new to ADRMS.

    Hi Ashim Kumar Nath,
    Have you registered SCP when installing ADRMS? If you can't remember, you can check this running ADSI Edit, connect to the configuration container in verify if those nodes exist CN=Configuration [server name], CN=Services, CN=RightsManagementServices,
    CN=SCP. Right click on SCP and verify that serviceBindingInformation contains your https://rms.company.com/_wmcs/certification server name.
    Did my post help you or make you laugh? Don't forget to click the Helpful vote :) If I answered your question please mark my post as an Answer.

  • Some clients are not receiving my mail attachments.

    Some clients are not receiving my mail attachments. Other recipients of the same email DO receive these attachments. It doesn't matter whether it is a jpg, pdf, doc, or other. Sending from gmail or entourage works, only sending from apple mail is a problem.  This has been an ongoing problem for me in Lion and Snow Leopard. I'm new to this forum, so not sure I'm posting in the right area, but I've searched for an answer and can't find anything. Do I need a plug-in or something?  I like my apple mail and don't want to switch, but this is a real problem for me.  Help, please!

    We have the same problem in Snow Leopard, so the problem isn't new. I've been researching this for a while now. Based on what I've read in a whole load of discussions it seems it's an issue in the way Outlook reads the e-mails send by Apple Mail. I've no idea of the technicalities of this but one obvious difference is that Mail's default formatting is Rich Text and Outlook's is HTML, but what do I know.
    We've done variuos test with our PC based clients but with no success: Send as Icon; Window's friendly attachement; Mail Attachement Iconiser, etc. Nothing gets rid of the problem entirely. We're a Mac based Public Relations agency and we send image to the media all of the time...and we have no guarantees that they are getting through.
    It's frustrating that Mail doesn't have an option, as it does for plain text, to send in an outlook friendly way. To me it's a huge problem and if Apple isn't going to sort it, given that Outlook is the choice of Enterprise and 95% of our clients, then we're going to have to spend thousands and switch to Outlook. Apple have gone to great pains to promote cross-compatibility with PC's and perhaps this is one little example of where they could try harder.
    Mail has not had much obvious love and attention for a while and if there's an Apple employee looking in on this thread, perhaps it's time to love it up, give it a few more bells and whistles (without over-complicating of course) and make it sing with Outlook.
    My last attenpt is to try Thunderbird as a default mail client; I'm told it doesn't suffer from the same PC compatibility issues.

  • Extending wireless network - allow wireless clients or not?

    Hi,
    sorry if this is a stupid question but I cannot find the answer on the internet.
    I have a setup with 3 level house, 3 airport extremes, the one in the middle connected via ethernet to router and acting as DHCP server.
    The other two are setup to 'extend network'
    Question I have is should I check "allow wireless clients" or not because when I do it seems to make the main AP extreme a client of the other two as well. This seems strange to me. any help would be appreciated.

    do you work in entertainment industry at all? I know a bob timmons...
    That would not be me.
    any ideas why my extension airport extremes see the main DHCP extreme as clients?
    This is normal. The "main" base station is a client of the "extending" Airport....and the "extending" AirPort is a client of the "main" base station.  You would not have any extension if they were not clients of each other. In simple terms, they are communicating with each other at all times.
    also any idea of the actual range of the AP extremes?
    They usually check out at about 45-50 meters or 150 feet or so....but range measurements are made in "free air" in a large space....like an airplane hangar......with no obstructions in the signal path. Most homes are laid out a bit differently.
    I've seen installations where the signal would barely go through one wall to a computer that was no more than 10 feet away from the router.  The wall was metal lathe and plaster, so in effect the very weak signal was being asked to power though metal. Not much signal was getting through.
    In very general terms, a typical wall of sheetrock or wallboard and 2 x 4s will absorb on average 15-20% of the wireless signal. A ceilng will absorb much more because it is much thicker.  In most homes, after 3 or 4 walls, or a ceiling and a wall, there won't be much signal left.
    Now, if you  have adobe walls or cement walls or ceilings, everything changes dramatically. You get the idea.
    My home is about 2400 sq ft, single level, of typical construction.  I use 3 AirPort Extremes....all connected by Ethernet....not wireless....to get full speed, fast coverage virtually everywhere.  I use an AirPort Express to "extend"....using wireless only....if I want to take my laptop out on the patio.
    Older iPhones can connect at maximum 54 Mbps if they are literally right on top of the router. Typically,they might be at 25-35 Mbps or so with a good signal in the next room.  The 180 and 270 numbers signify that these connections are 5 GHz...probably a newer Mac laptop or iMac.
    If you have a Mac laptop and don't mind a $3 investment to get a good utility, WiFi Explorer can reveal some very useful things about your network.  Post back if you are interested and we will take this up on Thursday.

  • SCCM 2012 R2 Clients are not retrieving policy

    Hi - I know this question has been asked many times before - but I have tried almost everything and a no closer to solving the problem.
    Background: Recently a SCCM 2012 SP1 single stand-alone site was upgraded to SCCM 2012 R2. The site is a single stand-alone primary site with a single DP, single MP, using mixed mode
    (HTTP). The R2 upgrade ran without any problem and all SCCM components are showing as healthy.
    A few test SCCM 2012 SP1 clients were upgraded to the R2 client using client-push.
    However the upgraded clients are not retrieving policy from the Management Point. In the Actions Tab of the SCCM client, only Machine Policy Retrieval and User Policy Retrieval are available. But kicking of those actions does not
    result in any of the advertised applications, Task Sequences becoming available. Infact Custom Client Settings are not being set either (e.g. Organisation Name in software Center).
    I have checked and rechecked the following:
    The upgrade of the client completed successfully (checked ccmsetup.log) and the version number went from 5.00.7804.1000 (SP1) to 5.00.7958.1000 (R2).
    The MP health in the SCCM console is showing healthy.
    The MP access URL's load correctly when run from SCCm client computers
    “http://<ServerName>/sms_mp/.sms_aut?mplist” is ok
    “http://<ServerName>/sms_mp/.sms_aut?mpcert” is ok
    The SCCM clients are assigned to the site correctly – verified via the SCCM client and
    ClientLocation.Log
    ClientIDManager.Log is not showing any errors
    CCMExec.log and ExecMgr.log don't show any advertisements being executed (Execmgr.log is almost empty and only has "Software ditrbution site settings policy does not yet exist on the client). If the client is not yest
    registered this is expected behaviour")
    The SCCM clients are Approved and NOT Blocked in SCCM
    I have attempted to upgrade the SCCM client and also completely removed and reinstalled - and both have the same result (no client policy dpwnloaded)
    I have also deleted the above clients completely from SCCM, Run divoery again and pushed the client to the machines again ...with the same result (SCCM client installs, assigns to correct site and then no policy downloaded)
    SCCM 2012 Boundaries are configured correctly and assigned to Boundary Groups correctly
    The SCCM client’s do not have the firewall enabled
    Changed boundary from AD Site to Subnet to IP Address Range: Same issue exists
    Uninstalled MP role and reinstalled it: same Issue exists
    Tried to connect to SCCm client using 3rd party SCCM Client center tool but cannot connect
    ??? Not sure what else to try ???

    Hi all - sorry for the late response.
    We managed to resolve the issue after logging a job with Microsoft Support.
    The issue was that the SCCM 2012 R2 upgrade corrupted 2 tables in the SCCM Database - leading to corrupt SCCM client policies.
    I am pasting the resolution email from Microsoft below:
    (NOTE: This may not be the exact sypmtoms you are experiencing so do not implement this fix assuming it will fix your problem!)
    ISSUE: 
    - All clients are unable to download policies from the server
    CAUSE:
    - Bad policies in the Database
    RESOLUTION: 
    -Issue with PADbID - Run below query against SCCM DB to verify corrupt entries:
    SELECT * FROM
    ResPolicyMap WHERE machineid = 0 and PADBID IN (SELECT PADBID FROM PolicyAssignment WHERE BodyHash IS NULL)
    Confirmed Bad policies entries in the SCCM database
    Run below query to delete the bad policy after which we resolved the issue:
    Delete FROM ResPolicyMap
    WHERE machineid = 0 and PADBID IN (SELECT PADBID FROM PolicyAssignment WHERE BodyHash IS NULL)"

  • WRT160NL DHCP reserved clients are not showing up in the DHCP Reservation window.... Why?

    I have 5 computers linked to my router. 4 are hardwired and I set it up so that each of the 5 has it's own static address. One of those computers is my DVR security camera system so can monitor my cameras remotely. It was working fine for years and now I can't access the DVR remotely anymore. I notice in the router Setup that the DHCP clients are not showing up as active even though two of the computers are on. I am running XP Pro on these machines and I can PING between them so I know some communication is going on. Also I can access the DVR cameras from my main computer using the internal IP address I assigned to the DVR, but not if I try to use my current WAN IP address.
    Would appreciate any advice on troubleshooting this problem.
    Thanks
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    It may have something to do with the firmware of the router. I suggest you should do that. The firmware that you can download from the Linksys website is version 1.0.0.3 Build 2. (http://support.linksys.com/en-us/support/routers/WRT160NL). After the upgrade, reset the router to factory settings (pressing and holding down the reset button). It is best to re-configure the router from scratch also. Try to power cycle your whole network as well.

  • Clients are not getting software updates

    Hi All,
    We have setup SCCM2012 with wsus, i installed the clients on some pcs and i can see the sccm software agent on pcs but clients are not getting updated. on SCCM2012 server console i downloaded then selecting deploy option and it is
    showing download-YES and deploy-Yes but clients are not getting. 
    can anyone please tell me what could be the reason.
    do i need to check at clients side that the sccm2012 site is working in browser? i checked it is not working becuase proxy is enabled. need to define in exception.
    Thanks.
    Agha 

    Hi Kent,
    I checked in registry on clients, it is showing correct name. please find the below WUAHandler.log error:
    <![LOG[CWuaHandler::SetCategoriesForLeafStateReportingExclusion called with E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B]LOG]!><time="09:28:31.299-180" date="02-02-2013" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="6976" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2452">
    <![LOG[Its a WSUS Update Source type ({D5ED6611-7DFF-4013-B8BB-F9FF4DE0EF1D}), adding it.]LOG]!><time="10:02:58.396-180" date="02-02-2013" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="8020" file="sourcemanager.cpp:1222">
    <![LOG[Enabling WUA Managed server policy to use server:
    http://sccmsrv and Policy ENABLED]LOG]!><time="10:02:59.145-180" date="02-02-2013" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="3" thread="8020" file="sourcemanager.cpp:1000">
    <![LOG[Failed to Add Update Source for WUAgent of type (2) and id ({D5ED6611-7DFF-4013-B8BB-F9FF4DE0EF1D}). Error = 0x87d00692.]LOG]!><time="10:02:59.145-180" date="02-02-2013" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="3" thread="8020" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2322">
    <![LOG[Its a WSUS Update Source type ({D5ED6611-7DFF-4013-B8BB-F9FF4DE0EF1D}), adding it.]LOG]!><time="05:53:02.950-180" date="02-03-2013" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="1424" file="sourcemanager.cpp:1222">
    <![LOG[Enabling WUA Managed server policy to use server:
    http://sccmsrv and Policy ENABLED]LOG]!><time="05:53:05.462-180" date="02-03-2013" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="3" thread="1424" file="sourcemanager.cpp:1000">
    <![LOG[Failed to Add Update Source for WUAgent of type (2) and id ({D5ED6611-7DFF-4013-B8BB-F9FF4DE0EF1D}). Error = 0x87d00692.]LOG]!><time="05:53:05.462-180" date="02-03-2013" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="3" thread="1424" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2322">
    <![LOG[Its a WSUS Update Source type ({D5ED6611-7DFF-4013-B8BB-F9FF4DE0EF1D}), adding it.]LOG]!><time="11:07:01.094-180" date="02-03-2013" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="4692" file="sourcemanager.cpp:1222">
    <![LOG[Enabling WUA Managed server policy to use server:
    http://sccmsrv and Policy ENABLED]LOG]!><time="11:07:03.606-180" date="02-03-2013" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="3" thread="4692" file="sourcemanager.cpp:1000">
    <![LOG[Failed to Add Update Source for WUAgent of type (2) and id ({D5ED6611-7DFF-4013-B8BB-F9FF4DE0EF1D}). Error = 0x87d00692.]LOG]!><time="11:07:03.606-180" date="02-03-2013" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="3" thread="4692" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2322">
    <![LOG[Its a WSUS Update Source type ({D5ED6611-7DFF-4013-B8BB-F9FF4DE0EF1D}), adding it.]LOG]!><time="11:08:00.110-180" date="02-03-2013" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="4692" file="sourcemanager.cpp:1222">
    <![LOG[Enabling WUA Managed server policy to use server:
    http://sccmsrv and Policy ENABLED]LOG]!><time="11:08:01.374-180" date="02-03-2013" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="3" thread="4692" file="sourcemanager.cpp:1000">
    <![LOG[Failed to Add Update Source for WUAgent of type (2) and id ({D5ED6611-7DFF-4013-B8BB-F9FF4DE0EF1D}). Error = 0x87d00692.]LOG]!><time="11:08:01.374-180" date="02-03-2013" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="3" thread="4692" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2322">

  • Users are not able to use Outlook 2010 to view free/busy information and cannot set Out Of Office automatic reply

    Hi All,
    Please help me.
    I have an issue where users are not able to use Outlook 2010 to view free/busy information and cannot set Out Of Office automatic reply. But they are can set Out Of Office automatic reply from OWA. My exchange server is Ms Exchange 2010.
    The test E-mail AutoConfiguration failed with this error:
    Autodiscover to https://mydomain.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml starting
    GetLastError=12175; httpStatus=0.
    Autodiscover to https://mydomain.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml Failed (0x800C8203)
    Autodiscover to https://autodiscover.mydomain.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml starting
    GetLastError=12007; httpStatus=0.
    Autodiscover to https://autodiscover.mydomain.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml Failed (0x800C8203)
    Local autodiscover for mydomain.com starting
    Local autodiscover for mydomain.com Failed (0x8004010F)
    Redirect check to http://autodiscover.mydomain.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml starting
    Srv Record lookup for http://autodiscover.mydomain.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml Failed (0x80072EE7)
    Srv Record lookup for mydomain.com starting
    Srv Record lookup for mydomain.com Failed (0x8004010F)
    Any idea?
    Thanks,
    Pieter

    OK.
    Please follow this step.
    1. As you said you are in coexistence step , so for now all endpoint already point to Exchange 2010 right?
    2. Check legacy owa redirect that you already configure
    3. In Exchange 2010 , Make sure that you already configure "Autodiscoverinternaluri" by this command set-clientaccessserver -identity "servername" -autodiscoverinternaluri
    https://autodiscover.domain.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml. and don't forget to create autodiscover record in DNS
    4. in Exchange 2010 , Make sure that you already configure "EWS" path by this command set-webservicesvertualdirectory -identity "XXX\Default web site name" -internalurl
    https://yourinternalurl/EWS/Exchange.asmx -externalurl https://yourexternalurl/EWS/Exchange.asmx
    5. don't forget to replicate freebusy from Exchange 2003 to Excahnge 2010 via public folder.
    You error look like client cannot get autodiscover process please check it again.

  • Why users are not able to see certain printers even though they are in the Airgroup server table

    Q: Why users are not able to see only certain printers even though they are in the Airgroup server table ?
    A: In certain scenarios  we may notice  printers come up under the server /cache entries on the controller.
    However when an airgroup user does search for printer, they may not see all the printers, certain printers may be not visible .
    This is because the service IDs sent by the user in the MDNS query are not broadcast by these printers 
    In the below capture the Ipad sends query for service id "_universal_sub_ipp_tcplocal" and "_universal_sub_ipps_tcplocal" and hence the controller will 
    respond with the printers that broadcasts these service ids.
    Non–Visible printer : 
    _printer._tcp.local                                                              PTR                         IN     7200  10.125.30.223  5820.05  Wed Mar 18 13:24:26 2015
    _pdl-datastream._tcp.local                                               PTR                         IN     7200  10.125.30.223  6112.25  Wed Mar 18 13:24:26 2015
    _ipp._tcp.local                                                                     PTR                         IN     7200  10.125.30.223  5888.15  Wed Mar 18 13:24:26 2015
    _http._tcp.local                                                                    PTR                         IN     7200  10.125.30.223  6293.88  Wed Mar 18 13:24:26 2015
    NPIED487E.local                                                                  A                             IN     240   10.125.30.223  194.43   Wed Mar 18 13:24:26 2015
    hp LaserJet 4250 [ED487E]._printer._tcp.local                     SRV/NBSTAT                  IN     240   10.125.30.223  209.87   Wed Mar 18 13:24:26 2015
    hp LaserJet 4250 [ED487E]._printer._tcp.local                     TXT                         IN     240   10.125.30.223  205.14   Wed Mar 18 13:24:26 2015
    hp LaserJet 4250 [ED487E]._printer._tcp.local                     TXT                         IN     240   10.125.30.223  197.18   Wed Mar 18 13:24:26 2015
    hp LaserJet 4250 [ED487E]._printer._tcp.local                     TXT                         IN     240   10.125.30.223  196.42   Wed Mar 18 13:24:26 2015
    hp LaserJet 4250 [ED487E]._printer._tcp.local                     TXT                         IN     240   10.125.30.223  208.15   Wed Mar 18 13:24:26 2015
    hp LaserJet 4250 [ED487E]._pdl-datastream._tcp.local              SRV/NBSTAT                  IN     240   10.125.30.223  207.35   Wed Mar 18 13:24:26 2015
    hp LaserJet 4250 [ED487E]._pdl-datastream._tcp.local              TXT                         IN     240   10.125.30.223  200.64   Wed Mar 18 13:24:26 2015
    hp LaserJet 4250 [ED487E]._ipp._tcp.local                         SRV/NBSTAT                  IN     240   10.125.30.223  209.44   Wed Mar 18 13:24:26 2015
    Visible-printer :
    _printer._tcp.local                                                                         PTR         IN     4500  10.125.26.29   3745.82  Wed Mar 18 13:24:51 2015
    _universal._sub._ipp._tcp.local                                                PTR         IN     4500  10.125.26.29   3694.14  Wed Mar 18 13:24:51 2015
    _ipp._tcp.local                                                                                PTR         IN     4500  10.125.26.29   3628.81  Wed Mar 18 13:24:51 2015
    _pdl-datastream._tcp.local                                                          PTR         IN     4500  10.125.26.29   3616.14  Wed Mar 18 13:24:51 2015
    _http._tcp.local                                                                              PTR         IN     4500  10.125.26.29   3793.56  Wed Mar 18 13:24:51 2015
    XRX9C934E25C52D.local                                                                A           IN     120   10.125.26.29   355.03   Wed Mar 18 13:24:51 2015
    Xerox WorkCentre 3615 (25:C5:2D)._printer._tcp.local         SRV/NBSTAT  IN     120   10.125.26.29   130.45   Wed Mar 18 13:24:51 2015
    Xerox WorkCentre 3615 (25:C5:2D)._printer._tcp.local         TXT         IN     4500  10.125.26.29   3670.33  Wed Mar 18 13:24:51 2015
    Xerox WorkCentre 3615 (25:C5:2D)._ipp._tcp.local             SRV/NBSTAT  IN     120   10.125.26.29   389.55   Wed Mar 18 13:24:51 2015
    Xerox WorkCentre 3615 (25:C5:2D)._ipp._tcp.local             TXT         IN     4500  10.125.26.29   3640.60  Wed Mar 18 13:24:51 2015
    Xerox WorkCentre 3615 (25:C5:2D)._pdl-datastream._tcp.local  SRV/NBSTAT  IN     120   10.125.26.29   210.97   Wed Mar 18 13:24:51 2015
    In order to learn other printers we may need to use specific app provided by printer vendor on the client or configure the printers to send these service IDs.

    The net 451 issues made it not work after a while but it affected the entire RWW site not just remote access:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2014/01/13/troubleshooting-an-unexpected-error-occurred-message-when-using-remote-web-access-to-connect-to-computers.aspx
    Careful if you try and uninstall it, you'll need to put back net 4.0 and reconfigure some stuff.
    Did it ever work?  
    Make sure the users have installed the certificate they need and turn on compatibility mode in IE (also make sure IE isn't locked down and disabling activeX).:
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd701173%28v=ws.10%29.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
    -- Al

  • Multibyte users are not able to authenticate using Default Authenticator

    Hi,
    We are facing an issue with multi-byte user authentication. All chinese and french users are not able to authenticate.
    When we try to authenticate with réseau/welcome1, where réseau is a user created in embedded LDAP, authentication fails.
    Security log generated is-
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <com.bea.common.security.internal.service.CallbackHandlerWrapper.handle got username from callbacks[0], UserName=rseau>
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <LDAP Atn Login username: rseau>
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <getConnection return conn:LDAPConnection { ldapVersion:2 bindDN:""}>
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <authenticate user:rseau>
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <getDNForUser search("ou=people,ou=myrealm,dc=base_domain", "(&(uid=rseau)(objectclass=person))", base DN & below)>
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <getDNForUser search("ou=people,ou=myrealm,dc=base_domain", "(&(uid=rseau)(objectclass=person))", base DN & below)>
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <returnConnection conn:LDAPConnection { ldapVersion:2 bindDN:""}>
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <[Security:090302]Authentication Failed: User rseau denied>
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <com.bea.common.security.internal.service.LoginModuleWrapper.commit>
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <LDAP Atn Abort>
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <com.bea.common.security.internal.service.LoginModuleWrapper.commit delegated, returning false>
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <weblogic.security.service.internal.WLSJAASLoginServiceImpl$ServiceImpl.authenticate authenticate failed for user rseau>
    We are using WebLogic Server 10.3 Default Authenticator as Authentication Provider.
    I found few change requests related to multi-byte from the link: http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs103/issues/known_resolved.html
    Am I missing some configuration? Has anyone else tried authenticate multibyte username?
    Thanks,
    Anuj

    Can you provide more information on the use case?
    1. Is this using Basic or Form authentication?
    2. If the user logs on from a web-based client, do you get the same failure with Internet Explorer as with other browsers?
    3. On which operating system is the WebLogic AdminServer running?
    With WebLogic Server 10.3, I am able to authenticate with multi-byte (French and Japanese) usernames. (My environment: form auth, Firefox 3.0.5, WLS runs on Linux RHEL 4.0.)

  • Sql services are not able to start in server

    We have rebooted inactive the server due to rolling maintenance.
    Sql is not running and sql services are not able to start. Getting the below error message while starting the services.
    please suggest how to fix?

    Could you try:
    To resolve the problem, use these steps:
    Change the startup account of both the MSSQLSERVER and SQLServerAgent to use the Local System account.
    Restart the computer.
    https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/307288
    Or check  NetLogon service is running

  • SSRS 2012 some users are not able to edit reports in the server

    Hello All,
    I am install reporting services SharePoint native mode but some users are not able to edit reports on server error is "Application cannot be started contact your application vendor" but this users edit reports on their client machine
    using report builder 3.0.
    Please help me

    Hi harshad_mule,
    Because Report Builder in the Report Manager is a ClickOnce application, the error message means that one or more of the files listed in the application manifest cannot be found on the server, so the application cannot be started. Based on my research, frequently
    this means that the application is somehow corrupted, or that the ClickOnce store is corrupted.
    To fix this issue, we can try to refer to the following steps:
    If Report Builder is corrupted, we can update the Reporting Services to repair this.
    Check that the Report Builder application is existing
        Open the Report Server folder. By default, the folder is located in: C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL.<X>\Reporting Services\ReportServer\ReportBuilder
        Make sure the file "ReportBuilder.application" is existing in the folder mentioned above.
    If it is existing, please use the following URL to access the Report Builder directly:
    http://<server>/ReportServer/ReportBuilder/ReportBuilder.application
    And this issue can also be caused by browser. Because not all report functionality is supported by all browsers in Reporting Services. So please use IE browser to start Report Builder to try it again.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    Katherine Xiong
    Katherine Xiong
    TechNet Community Support

  • My wife and I share the same email address and Apple ID.  We are not able to send and receive Text Messages to one another.

    My wife and I share the same email address and Apple ID. We are not able to send and receive Text Messages to one another. Is the cause of this because we share the same Apple ID? Will we have to set up 2 separate primary email addresses to be able to  send and receive Tex Messages to one another? Like I said, we share the same email address and woul like to keep it that way to keep up with our email together. Is there a way to by-pass having to set up 2 primary emaill addresses if this is the problem?
    Thanks.

    go to the settings and turn off imessage
    but that don't change the issue that you will never be able to facetime eachtoher
    the appleID is really meant as the handle that identify you it was not meant to be shared
    but can see that people may want to do not buy apps more then once

  • I have a problem with my Iphone 4s since I did my first update at your Itunes, the bluetooth and the WiFi it is not workinhg anymore.  It is sad that companies like apple are not able to support thier sofware and business.  I went to a apple store at Sout

    I have a problem with my Iphone 4s since I did my first update at your Itunes, the bluetooth and the WiFi it is not workinhg anymore.
    It is sad that companies like apple are not able to support thier sofware and business.
    I went to a apple store at South Park, Charlotte NC,
    and found out the worst customer service (in my case)
    They don't have answers and don't understand about  "dont let any customer go away sad or mad"
    I explain to them that I did everything they said to fix the problem, even to dounload the iOS 6.1.3
    that was supposed to fix the problem.
    they said fix the problem in other phones but not in mine.
    So here I am with no wifi and bluetooth, with apple technicians and experts that don't know what to do with the problem that the sofware they developed cause in my iphone 4s.
    and the solution is for me to pay $199.00 US dollars for a problem that I did not cause.
    wich means to buy something else from apple to fix a problem that it is not my fault.
    Great! what a convenient solution.
    I would like to have an answer from you guys and see if someone there have a better answer for me that shows support, values and integrity as a grest company with solutions for your customers.
    Dont think that I want a new phone, I want mine fixed if is possible.
    Thank you very much and God Bless you!

    Apple isnt here. this is a user based forum for technical questions. The solution is to restart, reset, and restore as new which is in the manual after that get it replaced for hard ware failure. if your within your one year warranty its replaced if it is out of the warranty then it is 199$

Maybe you are looking for