FMDERIVE FM assignments during migo goods issue posting
Hello experts,
We are using funds management (ECC 5.0) . During goods issue to reservation the fund, fund centre, commitment item which are entered in the reservation document are displayed during the fmderive trace. Even while performing check (under MIGO) the display and commitment item derivation is correct. But when posting , the first screen of trace shows all fields correctly.
On clicking X, all the data fund, fund centre commitment are initialised to BLANK. And system gives error "No fund cente derived , entered FI313" even though the migo screen shows all the data intact. Somehow MIGo when posting initilaises all the fields
Please help
HKrishnan
Indian Rayon
Hi all,
thanks for the helpful suggestions. I have found that while doing the actual posting for
goods issue , fmderive was trying to derive commitment item, and since nor rule was applicable it was giving the error. it was due to an erroneous rule wherein the inventory posting flag waas missing in the relevant GL, and corresponding credit/debit entry was also missing.
Now corrected. I have still not understood, why the derivation blanks out all the fields which have been already entered by user in the original document.
In other words of the field commitment item is already fileld it should skip the entire FMDERIVE process.
Anyway thanks all
Similar Messages
-
Return under Warranty (Tracking Line only) Should we use MIGO - Goods Issue
Return under Warranty (Tracking Line only) Should we use MIGO - Goods Issue when sending out Materials for repair or exchange under Warranty (Free)?
Please post it in SD/MM forum.
-
Hi Experts,
while i am doing MIGO(Goods Issue to Production Order, I am getting the below ABAP Error:
Please give solution, It is urgent requirement.
THE ERROR IS:
Short text
Illegal interruption of the event LOAD-OF-PROGRAM.
What happened?
Error in the ABAP Application Program
The current ABAP program "/MRSS/SAPLRAP_INT_OB" had to be terminated because it
has come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
Error analysis
During the flow of the event LOAD-OF-PROGRAM (event for the
initialization of an ABAP program), a condition occurred under which
the event was to be left early. This is not permitted as it would
result in an inconsistent status in the ABAP program.
Trigger Location of Runtime Error
Program /MRSS/SAPLRAP_INT_OB
Include /MRSS/LRAP_INT_OBF00
Row 34
Module type (FORM)
Module Name GLOBAL_INIT
Source Code Extract
Line SourceCde
4
5 *&---------------------------------------------------------------------*
6 *& Form global_init
7 *&---------------------------------------------------------------------*
8 * text
9 *----------------------------------------------------------------------*
10 FORM global_init.
11
12 * local data
13 DATA lv_badi_impl_exists TYPE flag.
14
15
16 * get ref to BAdIs
17 CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance "#EC CI_BADI_GETINST
18 CHANGING
19 instance = gv_ref_badi_inter_company.
20 * CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance
21 * CHANGING
22 * instance = gv_ref_badi_rap_back.
23 * CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance
24 * CHANGING
25 * instance = gv_ref_badi_ps_int.
26 CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance "#EC CI_BADI_GETINSTHi Rob thanks for your response. I thought about doing an OSS note however; I would think I would need to get the problem in config corrected first as it contradicts each other. The problem I am talking about is how they are to return material to vendor....I have never even seen this as a process in my 10 years....
Process.....when the PO is a return to vendor PO they go to migo and choose the goods receipt and mvmt type 101 and the system will default the 161 in the item level....the two are inconsistent. If I try to change the top level to a 161 mvmt (as this is what I am used to seeing) it gives the error that the PO is not a stock transport order... Would you agree that I should correct that problem first before creating an OSS note? -
MIGO- Goods Issue- Order, the value is not written into Table COSP
Hi,
We make a substitution of wbs element of line item( BSEG-PROJK ). The wbs filed will be filled automatically when the user input a cost center or a order number.
But we found some inconsistency in standard report S_ALR_87013558 OR CJI3.
The following is what we have done:
In Tcode F-02, we enter a order(e.g. A), then the WBS Element is filled automatically. when we post the document, and go to Standard report: S_ALR_87013558,
we can see the amount in the report.
In MIGO, we make a goods issue by order(e.g. A. Movement type is 261) , when we post, Material Document and Accounting document and Controlling document , but in report S_ALR_87013558 or CJI3. the amount is wrong, we can not see the amount we have done in MIGO.
The movement type 201 is also wrong, the value is also not written into tabl cosp.
But GI for project-movement type 221, the value is written into table cosp.
Can you tell me this is wrong or right? if right, why? if wrong, how can i correct it, i need some customizing or others? or my substitution affect the result?
Best Regards
qingdaSorry, not reply these days.
And very thanks for all your replies.
I am a abaper, not familiar with the business.
The business consultant want to control budget, control cost.
At first, he let me do a substibution in FI line item of besg-projk(WBS Element), when we he test the substitution in TCode F-02, the WBS field is filled automatically as per G/L account and Cost Center or as per G/L Account and Order, and then in Standard Report 'S_ALR_87013558', we can see the changes of the cost.
But when biz consultant do a MIGO->Goods Issue by order, we can not see the changes of the cost,but the value of WBS in FI Accounting Document is substituted correctly.
And if we enter the WBS manually when we do a MIGO->Goods Issue by order, we can see the changes of the report 'S_ALR_87013558'.
In the original post, i was wrong, when we do a goods issue with movement type 201, the result is the same as 261, also we cant see the changes. but if we enter the wbs manually(movement type 201),the changes is write to COSP table.
The solution about the original requirement is right or wrong?
Thank You All.
Best Regards
qingda -
Problem with MIGO goods issue to a Service Order
Hello All
I have checked through out the forum as well as google and can not find the answer to my issue. Please read the below details and advise....
In MIGO; when trying to perform a goods issue to a service order (created in IW31) I get an error message the document does not contain any selectable items. I can not get passed this. When I use the transaction MB11, it works just fine. I went to the allowed transactions in OMJJ to ensure MIGO was listed as an allowed transaction... and MIGO is listed so I know that is not my issue. It is not related to the service order not being released as it is and plus if it was not released it would not work in MB11. I need this to work for the transaction MIGO....Please someone guide me in the proper direction of what is missing.Hi Kimberly,
When you post the goods issue as an unplanned goods movement against the order, the reservation is not even read, so it is never updated.
The data that you enter manually in this unplanned goods issue does not even need to match with the data in the reservation: the material, the plant... evrything can be different. The order is just a CO Account Assignment in this case and the reservation is not processed in any moment. This way, it is not possible to close the reservation when posting this kind of unplanned goods issue, as the reservation is not even considered (and, therefore, never updated).
It is only when you post the planned goods issue referencing the order directly when you really post your goods issue with reference to the reservation behind the order. Only in this case is when the data in the posting is checked against the reservation (the material, the plant, etc cannot be changed because they are taken directly from the reservation). Also, it is only in this case when the quantity in the posting is checked against the quantity in the reservation. If we issue the total reserved quantity, the reservation is closed automatically.
In the first case for the unplanned goods issue there is never an automatic update of the reservation because the posting does not even consider the reservation. It is only when you post the goods movement with reference to the order (in MB1A using "To Order..." and in MIGO "Goods Issue + Order") when the reservation is taken into account in the goods movement and, therefore, updated.
You can also refer to the SAP Library:
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/a5/6337db43a211d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm]
It says:
"This withdrawal is unplanned because there is no reservation to be referenced."
An unplanned goods issue with the movement 261 and the order (working as CO account assignment object) is more or less the same as a 201 for a cost center. The cost center and the order are just CO Objects in this scenario.
I hope this helps you further!
Best regards,
Esther. -
Change Moving Average Price when Post Goods issue posted from VL02N
Hi all,
Please help me to find USER EXIT / BADI or Enhancement to change Price - MSEG-DMBTR
when Post Goods Issue posted from transaction VL02N.
Thanks in advance,
Mila.Hi,
Check these Enhancemnts...
Exit Name Description
V02V0001 Sales area determination for stock transport order
V02V0002 User exit for storage location determination
V02V0003 User exit for gate + matl staging area determination (headr)
V02V0004 User Exit for Staging Area Determination (Item)
V50PSTAT Delivery: Item Status Calculation
V50Q0001 Delivery Monitor: User Exits for Filling Display Fields
V50R0001 Collective processing for delivery creation
V50R0002 Collective processing for delivery creation
V50R0004 Calculation of Stock for POs for Shipping Due Date List
V50S0001 User Exits for Delivery Processing
V53C0001 Rough workload calculation in time per item
V53C0002 W&S: RWE enhancement - shipping material type/time slot
V53W0001 User exits for creating picking waves
VMDE0001 Shipping Interface: Error Handling - Inbound IDoc
VMDE0002 Shipping Interface: Message PICKSD (Picking, Outbound)
VMDE0003 Shipping Interface: Message SDPICK (Picking, Inbound)
VMDE0004 Shipping Interface: Message SDPACK (Packing, Inbound)
Badi Name Description
DELIVERY_ADDR_SAP Determine Time-Dependent Delivery Address in Delivery
DELIVERY_PUBLISH Returns BAdI Implementation: Automatic GR Posting T 2
DELIVERY_PUBLISH Updating of Delivery in Purchase Order
DELIVERY_PUBLISH AIP: Delivery Confirmation for Sales Order
Regards
Raghu -
hi all
how to get the Goods Issue Posting Time for the purchase order.
thanks
balaHi
If i understood correctly, you are looking to track the issues pertaining to PO.
There is no relevancy of issues of PO, if the material procured is stock material. This means, your procurement is intended for stock only. Issues will be made to the departments who approachs with necessary requirement.
If your procurement is for consumption (account assigned PO), your GR document is nothing but the consumption doc. You can find the goods consumption time from the GR document.
warm regards
sairam akundi -
Hi Gurus,
We upgraded to 6.0 from 4.5b.When I am trying with MIGO,Goods issue with Mov type 201,221,261 etc.
System is giving error message as"Update control of movement type is incorrect (entry 201 X X _ B)"
Edited by: hanuma reddy on Mar 13, 2008 11:04 PMHello Hanuma
I would assume that this is caused by the fact that you do not specify the needed basis in the MIGO transaction.
If you look in OMJJ for 201 movement type at folder short texts or update control, then you will see a column called Mvt for movement indicator.
DO you see see Bs and Fs there or it is blank, if it is blank then try using other tcode as mentioned above MB1A or MIGO_GI.
Regards
Yogesh -
RE: Goods issue posting through Migo for Production Order
I have released the production order, when I want to post the goods issue through migo to the concerned order I am getting error saying that material "No components exist but there was stock in the storage location for unresticted use.
I have checked through MMbe transaction.Are there components in the Production Order? If yes, is the reservation created and movement allowed for the reservation?
Lakshman -
Error during goods issue-Posting period not open
Hi ,
I am getting an error during goods issue which says posting period not open.I guess that we have had deliveries that were created and in process while crossing over from one financial period to another quite frequently before, but we were still able to goods issue them in the next period. Can anyone tell me why this error happens and if there is any work around for this?
Thanks,
Hari.Hi,
Goods issue takes place, say on a given date and this should be updated, so that the plant valuation changes are recorded. But the periods need to opened to do this. Normally there are two posting periods available, one is in MM, done by t.code MMPV and the other in FI, t.code is OB52.
So, in MMPV we need have the current month as the posting period. But in your case it was allowing, probably because you have marked the indicator " allow posting in previous period " in MMRV t.code as our friend just conveyed.
Hope it helps. Please reward if useful.
Thanks & Regards
Sadhu Kishore -
Goods Receipt and Goods Issue - Posting Date and Document Date Problem
Hi All,
I was using SDK to build own add on to insert Posting Date and Document Date under Inventory> Inventory Transactions> Goods Receipt and Inventory> Inventory Transactions> Goods Issue, but the UI Screen Posting Date and Document Date shown current date.
My SAP Business One version was 2007A SP00 PL42 and alreadly upgrade to SP05.
End up result still the same.
Is there someone can help me?
Thanks you.
Best Regards,
dannyHi there,
I already solve it by myself.
Actually is i call the initialization twice:
Company.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oInventoryGenEntry)
Thats what make this problem happened.
Sorry.
Best Regards,
danny -
Batch not determined in MIGO-Goods Issue for cost center
Hi,
We are using Batch Determination while posting Goods Issue to cost center. However, when we enter * in the batch field system does not propose the batches.
We have done following settngs
Strategy type ME01 which is SAP standard
Batch search procedure - ME0001
Search procedure ME0001 is assigned to movement type 201 in "Allocate IM Search Procedure/Activate Check"
Sort Rule - 01 using charecterstics (ascending)
Class - BATCH_MASTER created
Characterstics - Size, Shape, Color (No table or field are maintained in Addional Data) assigned to this class.
Material is maintained with classification and batch management active.
Master Data - Search Strategy is maintained using t code MBC1 for stratefy type ME01 (Key combination Movement Type/Plant/Material). Selection criteria - Values maintained for characterstics. Sort Rule - 01
Now when we are issuing goods to cost center and enter * in batch field, system is supposed to suggest the batches (material is in stock and batches are available). However, system does not give pop up.
Am I missing something? Where is the batch determination button as system is giving message to use button?
ShekharThank you for the answer.
It gives only one batch and not all the batches. Why it could be?
Shekhar -
PR-PO-MIGO-Goods issue.(how can do particular GI against aprticular PR)
Dear Friends,
can you guide me on folowing issue.
Through PR-PO-GR(MIGO) i am doing Goods receipt.
but when i will do goods issue , i should know this goods issue will be against which PR or against which PO or against which MIGO.
Means i wants to issue the material which is against the PR that materials PR only . Not the material which came from any other PR.
Regards,
MAhesh.Dear,
Considering plant inventory - there is no standard functionality available to issue goods reference to PR,PO or GRN.
Goods issue movement make any relevant text field or any other suitable field as mandatory and inform users to enter either PR, PO, GRN - OR - most importantly, check with development to enter PR number in PO mandatory, this text automatically flow into GRN and to Goods issue.
Regards,
Syed Hussain. -
WM - Confirm Transfer Order - and automated Goods Issue posting
Hi
We operate Warehouse Management, on the Sales Process that has been implemented, we have standard sales order, delivery with a transfer order created in WM, when the TO for the delivery is confirmed in WM (tcode LT12) this usually automatically creates the goods issue in MM.
However sometimes the Goods Issue in MM is not created automatically, I can see no immediate reason why, and if the Delivery is brought up in VL02N, and 'Post Goods Issue' option chosen it goes through fine without any probs.
Any ideas welcome on what I should be checking to track the problem?There is no background job that is producing the Post Goods Issue in this instance after the TO is manually confirmed in LT12. My issue is that usually the PGI happens automatically from the TO being confirmed (not by a background scheduled job), but in some instances it does not.
It is the latter problems I am trying to trace, as when the PGI is not automatic from the TO confirmation, we are able to goto VL02N (Change Delivery) and issue a PGI without an error. The problem is that this is an extra step, I wish to trace why it is not automatic from the TO confirmation like in 98% of cases in our setup.
There is defintely no background job scheduling PGI, I am aware of the RVV50L21 program which can be used to schedule background jobs for PGI, as we use this on another Sales Org (where WM is not used), but it is not scheduled for the Plants/Shipping Points regarding my TO/auto PGI issue. -
Goods Issue posting in multiple company codes
Hello All,
While the sales order is PGI'd , there are multiple accounting documents generated. One for the sales under selling organizations company code X and another one posts a COGS under a different company code Y(Posts as Intercompany Accoounting document as it X has received from Y) which is wrong. We have 2 sales orders of different plants but with same company code , the first plant is working fine and is posting as expected , but the second one is posting multiple accounting documents to 2 company codes . We have checked all the configuration and everything looks good , we have raised a VH OSS to SAP and they are looking into it. Just wanted to get your views on taking this forward. Movement type is 601.
Your inputs are highly appreciated.
ThanksWhile the sales order is PGI'd , there are multiple accounting documents generated
Can you please share the screen shot of document flow from sale order? As you would be aware, in normal circumstances, once a delivery is posted for goods issue, following would be an accounting entry.
COGS Dr
FG Inventory Cr
G. Lakshmipathi
Maybe you are looking for
-
My OS is current and up to date. No problems there.... Intel based iMac, relatively new.... But since i did the upgrade to iTunes 10.5 i cannot sync my iPhone. It's a 3gs. Oddly - my wifes iPhone will load and sync (it is a first gen iPhone, btw). Ne
-
Can I create a Submit Form button that allows a choice of who to submit it to?
I have some paperwork that all new hires need to complete and then send back to their specific HR representative. Is there a way to allow them to choose which email they want to submit their form to? We're dealing with blue collar workers that aren
-
i found a great tutorial on how to create a photo gallery that loads the content from an xml file. right now, the code cycles through the pictures, and when it reaches the end it stops. also, when you first launch the gallery (at the beginning/first
-
ADF: How do I add a node to a selected root in a TreeModel
I've created a TreeModel with something that follows: 1.) Loop through a List and build the Roots: for (TransactRow transactionRootRow : transactionResults) { TransactionNode transactionRootItem = new TransactionNode(transactionRootRow.getTransactKey
-
Iphoto Slideshow Transfer to PC
How do I transfer an Iphoto Slideshow Project, with edited photos in a preferred order, from my Ipad Air to my windows 7 PC?