For all entries against Ranges

Hi,
I have a question regarding a Select query where I have to select some data and then store it in table and refer it for the 2nd Select.
eg: Select from table 1
      into itab1.
    select from table 2
   into itab2
   for all entries in itab1.
My question is should I use a Range for the 1st select instead of an itab.The itab1 will be containing max 50 records.
The problem with for all entries is that I cannot use 'UP TO ROWS' as it only deletes extra entries at application level and not database level. I will be selecting 1000 rows even if I want only 100 rows.
Please let me know ur views

From a performance perspective ranges perform better than FOR ALL ENTRIES however the number of records you can use in your range is limited. You will get a run time dump if your range size increases beyond the allowable. If you are very confident that you have not more than 50 entries in your range, I would recommend that you use the range instead of FOR ALL ENTRIES.
An even better option would be to use a join of two tables. If you can provide specifics I could help you further.

Similar Messages

For all Enteries in & Ranges Performance Problem

Is there any soln of For all enteries in & Ranges as
If i use for all enteries in my report, it becomes slow .
and if i use Ranges , if no. of record exceeds system will throw dump.
Since long i couldnt find any good soln for this problem , can anyone guide me
how to solve this problem.
Thanks

Hi All
I am pasting down query for more expert optimzation comments of the current probs
SELECT zsd_weigh_bridg1~weight_no zsd_weigh_bridg1~challn_no
           likp~vbeln AS likp_vbeln likp~lfdat
           lips~vgbel
           vbfa~vbeln AS vbfa_vbeln vbfa~vbtyp_n
           mkpf~budat
*         vtfa~vbeln AS vtfa_vbeln
           ekko~knumv AS ekko_knumv
           ekpo~inco1 ekpo~werks
           APPENDING CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE lit_in
      FROM zsd_weigh_bridg1
           INNER JOIN likp ON likp~traid = zsd_weigh_bridg1~weight_no
           INNER JOIN lips ON lips~vbeln = likp~vbeln
           INNER JOIN vbfa ON vbfa~vbelv = likp~vbeln
           LEFT OUTER JOIN mkpf ON mkpf~mblnr = vbfa~vbeln
           LEFT OUTER JOIN vtfa ON vtfa~vbelv = vbfa~vbeln
           INNER JOIN ekko ON ekko~ebeln = lips~vgbel
           INNER JOIN ekpo ON ekpo~ebeln = ekko~ebeln
*           FOR ALL ENTRIES IN git_bridge
      WHERE zsd_weigh_bridg1~weight_no in r_weight." git_bridge-weight_no ." r_weight.
ENDIF.
lit_in_tmp[] = lit_in[].
DELETE lit_in_tmp WHERE vbtyp_n NE '8'.
IF lit_in_tmp[] IS NOT INITIAL.
    SELECT mandt knumv kposn vbeln netwr netpr INTO TABLE lit_vfsi
      FROM vfsi FOR ALL ENTRIES IN lit_in
     WHERE vbeln EQ lit_in-likp_vbeln.
    SELECT mandt tknum vbelv posnv vbtyp_v vbeln posnn vbtyp_n
           INTO TABLE lit_vtfa
      FROM vtfa FOR ALL ENTRIES IN lit_in
     WHERE vbelv EQ lit_in-vbfa_vbeln.
    IF lit_vtfa[] IS NOT INITIAL.
      SELECT mandt fknum fkpos knumv
        FROM vfkp INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE lit_vfkp
             FOR ALL ENTRIES IN lit_vtfa
       WHERE fknum EQ lit_vtfa-vbeln.
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.

Facin problems in the 'Select... for all entries'

I am facing problem with this piece of code, please share ur thoughts on it. I have specified the inputs.
I am extracting the open items from the BSIS table for specified 3 account number.
Inputs to the prg:
field     No. of values
r_bukrs       1
r_hkont      2
r_blart     6
r_budat date range of 1 yr
r_bldat nil
v_tosdef contain 1 account number
" In each FI document posted, one line will have the 'v_tosdef' account number and one account from the 'r_hkont' values."
So will this query efficient.
SELECT bukrs
         hkont
         gjahr
         belnr
         budat
         bldat
         xblnr
         blart
         shkzg
         dmbtr
    FROM bsis
    INTO TABLE i_bsis
   WHERE bukrs IN r_bukrs                    " Company code
     AND hkont = v_tosdef                  " Account number
     AND budat IN r_budat                    " Posting date
     AND bldat IN r_bldat                    " Document date
     AND blart IN r_blart.                   " Document type
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    MESSAGE i003.
    STOP.
ENDIF.
*@ Collecting the BELNR & GJAHR From the extracted records
li_bsis[] = i_bsis[].
SORT li_bsis BY bukrs gjahr belnr.
DELETE ADJACENT
DUPLICATES FROM li_bsis
        COMPARING bukrs gjahr belnr.
IF NOT li_bsis[] IS INITIAL.
    SELECT bukrs
           hkont
           gjahr
           belnr
           budat
           bldat
           xblnr
           blart
           shkzg
           dmbtr
      FROM bsis
APPENDING TABLE i_bsis
       FOR ALL ENTRIES IN li_bsis
     WHERE bukrs = li_bsis-bukrs               " Company code
       AND hkont IN r_hkont                    " Account number
       AND gjahr = li_bsis-gjahr              " Fiscal year
       AND belnr = li_bsis-belnr.             " Document num
BSIS table size around 86GB
primary index size aroung 33GB
and the index quality is 54%
the CBO shows less cost, but the actual runs takes too much disk read's / bgets..
Message was edited by:
        Sandy

Hi Sandy,
You indicated the size of the tables and index, what is the total number of records in your BSIS?
In your range tables, make sure they are postive formed.
Ex. r_bukrs : I EQ '1001', and not I NE '1000'.
You should consider coding your statements to check for input for bldat, code it with r_bldat and then another set without. It should be better performance to not have empty where conditions. So two routines, Selects with bldat and without.
Don't know if you have a Basis person to help analyze the performance, but you should look at the indexes in BSIS. You may have several indexes that contain some of your input fields but they may be spread across several indexes or there may be none. But say you have 5 indexes and it happens that just one of your parameters are in each of those indexes. Well, it can only use one index so while you think you are providing alot of parameters to help performance only one field is being used to access the index. What you need to do then is to find an index that has the most fields in your where clause and see if you can add to that, so long it's not an SAP index. If it's a z index consider adding additional fields to it, or consider creating a new index.
You can at least analyze the first Select in your DEV client. Run a trace, ST05 and then execute your code. It will show you which index it has used if any.
Also, look at the query values it is passing to the database. You said you get 6 M records on the first Select. This just seem like a lot of records, which is for just one account number (v_tosdef) along with the other parameters. I'm wondering if there's a problem with your input data. With 6M in your first table, your FOR ALL ENTRIES statement will be executed 1.2 million times. Tyically the database interface breaks down your Select-For All entries statement into 5 records per query. Again, run ST05 and you will see this.
In SE16, on your BSIS table, what is your count of records if you enter only the account number?
As a test, you might want to try entering all your parameters in SE16, run ST05 to trace the SQL to see what it is doing. You may have to kill your SE16 session or it may time out on you. You can stop your ST05 trace before your SE16 finishes and it will still show how SAP is going after the data and what index it used.
Let me know if this helped any.
Regards,
Filler

FOR ALL ENTRIES IN with two tables

Hi Guy's,
I have two int. tables, gt_likp, gt_lips.
I need to use "FOR ALL ENTRIES IN" with this two tables.
SELECT matnr
         vkorg
         vtweg
         ypcogsl
    FROM mvke
    INTO TABLE gt_mvke
<b>    "FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_likp gt_lips"</b>
    WHERE matnr = gwa_liefpos_tab-matnr
    AND vkorg = gt_likp-vkorg
    AND vtweg = gt_lips-vtweg.
How to do this?
Please Help.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi,
Fill gt_likp-vkorg values in a range(r_vkorg). Use gt_lips in FOR ALL ENTRIES.
Basically you can use only 1 internal table with FOR ALL ENTRIES statement.
SELECT matnr
vkorg
vtweg
ypcogsl
FROM mvke
INTO TABLE gt_mvke
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_lips
WHERE matnr = gwa_liefpos_tab-matnr
AND       vkorg in r_vkorg
AND       vtweg = gt_lips-vtweg.
- SRao

Develop alv using for all entries

Develop an Sales Document ALV Report .
     Select the mentioned field from two tables using FOR ALL ENTRIES , display the output in ALV Format.
Table Name 1     KNA1     General Data in Customer Master
Fields     KUNNR
     LAND1
     ERDAT
     NAME1
     ORT01
     PSTLZ
Table Name 2     VBAK     Sales Document: Header Data
Fields     VBELN
     AUDAT
     VBTYP
     TRVOG
     AUART
ALV O / P Format Fields     KUNNR     from KNA1 Table
     LAND1     from KNA1 Table
     ERDAT     from KNA1 Table
     NAME1     from KNA1 Table
     ORT01     from KNA1 Table
     PSTLZ     from KNA1 Table
     VBELN     from VBAK Table
     AUDAT     from VBAK Table
     VBTYP     from VBAK Table
     TRVOG     from VBAK Table
     AUART     from VBAK Table
Moderator Message: This is not a training forum. Please refrain from using it as one.
Edited by: kishan P on Jun 6, 2011 2:23 PM

FOA is for passing one internal table to select statement..
Press F1 on it, it will give you the details.
if you really want to pass more than one tables, you can use range tables.. just similar to what we do in case of select-options..
as in
select x y z from dbtab
                     where x in s_x
                              y in s_y.
hope you understand..

Populating Empty Fields for Existing Internal Table Using For All Entries

I have an internal table called itab_extract that populates without any issues in SELECT A and SELECT B below. Trying to avoid looping, I am using select DB table 'for all entries' in itab_extract. I want the empty fields in itab_extract to populate from the values in the database. However, about 200,000 entries are being appended to the table, and, the values that existed for the already populated fields in itab_extract are gone, and the new fields are populated.
I've played with the syntax and cannot seem to get it to work. My next option is a time consuming loop.
How should the for all entries syntax look to accomplish filling the empty fields in the itab?   Thank-You
*read ekko
    select ebeln lifnr aedat bsart from ekko                                                     *SELECT A*
           into CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE me->itab_extract
           where aedat in r_aedat.
    select ebeln lifnr aedat BSART from ekko                                                  *SELECT B*
           appending CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE me->itab_extract
           where aedat in S_DATE2 AND
                 BSART IN S_BSART.
      select ebelp werks matnr                                                                           *SELECT C*
        into CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE itab_extract
        from ekpo
        FOR ALL ENTRIES IN itab_extract
        where ebeln = itab_extract-ebeln.

Hi Tom,
           This SQL statement will be time consuming, Do not use a loop.
There are two options.
1. Select EKKO and EKPO details based on standard SAP view. (You can type EKKO in se11 view to find the correct view).
    also use one range table populate r_aedat and s_date2 in the same. So you where condition will have r_newrange and
    s_bsart. Also do not use into corresponding fields, it is not a good idea. It will increase your performance. Maintain the proper
    sequence (Based on database structure of EKKO and EKPO)
2. If you are keen to use for all entries, then first select ekko then after your sy-subrc check get the data from EKPO.
Should be like this.
select ebeln bsart aedat lifnr from ekko into table gt_ekko where aedat in r_newrange and bsart in s_bsart.
if sy-subrc eq 0.
sort gt_ekko by ebeln ascending.
select ebeln ebelp werks matnr into table gt_ekpo for all entries in gt_ekko where ebeln eq gt_ekko-ebeln.
endif.
Hope it helps,
Best Regards,
Tapodipta Khan.

Usage of FOR ALL ENTRIES in SELECT query

Hi All,
While writing SELECT query using FOR ALL ENTRIES, in the WHERE condition can we use IN operator on a range table?
Will this work out.
Thanks,
Anil Kumar

HI,
Yes you can use the in operator.
SELECT *
FROM MARC
INTO TAB:E i_mARC
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN I_MARA
WHERE MATNR EQ I_MARA_MATNR
AND WERKS IN S_WERKS.

Group by with for all entries

Hi,
   SELECT max( VBELN ) VGBEL VGPOS POSNR FKIMG VRKME NTGEW MATNR ARKTX WERKS MVGR3
       FROM VBRP
       INTO TABLE T_INVIT
       FOR ALL ENTRIES IN T_INVHD
       WHERE VBELN = T_INVHD-VBELN
       AND    SPART = T_INVHD-SPART
       AND    werks IN swerks
       AND    mvgr3 IN smvgr3
       group by VBELN VGBEL VGPOS POSNR FKIMG VRKME NTGEW MATNR ARKTX WERKS MVGR3.
i want to (max) invoice no against a delivery i.e vgbel but in this query i am getting error that with for all entries only count * is allowed.
regards
Fozia

Hi Do this way..
IF NOT T_INVHD[] is initial.
LOOP AT T_INVHD
SELECT max( VBELN ) VGBEL VGPOS POSNR FKIMG VRKME NTGEW MATNR ARKTX WERKS MVGR3
FROM VBRP
INTO T_INVIT
WHERE VBELN = T_INVHD-VBELN
AND SPART = T_INVHD-SPART
AND werks IN swerks
AND mvgr3 IN smvgr3
group by VGBEL VGPOS POSNR FKIMG VRKME NTGEW MATNR ARKTX WERKS MVGR3.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
APPEND T_INVIT.
CLEAR T_INVIT
ENDIF.
endselect.
endloop.
endif.
EVEN NO EFFECT ON PERFORMANCE
RGDS
RAJESH

Problem with FOR ALL ENTRIES statement

Hi all
please find the problem in the select statement.
SELECT vbbe~vbeln
         vbap~vstel
         marc~dispo
         vbbe~matnr
         vbbe~kunnr
         vbbe~werks
         vbbe~mbdat
         vbbe~omeng
INTO TABLE l_t_dvbeln
FROM vbbe
INNER JOIN vbak
ON
vbbe~vbeln = vbak~vbeln
inner join vbap
on
vbbe~vbeln = vbap~vbeln and
vbbe~matnr = vbap~matnr
inner join marc
on
vbbe~matnr = marc~matnr and
vbbe~werks = marc~werks
FOR ALL entries IN g_t_stock
WHERE vbbe~matnr = g_t_stock-matnr
AND   vbbe~werks = g_t_stock-werks
AND   vbak~vkorg = g_t_stock-vkorg
AND   vbak~vtweg = g_t_stock-vtweg
AND   vbbe~kunnr = g_t_stock-kunnr
AND   vbbe~mbdat IN r_mbdat.
g_t_stock is having only one record i.e.,
g_t_stock-vstel = 'DF01'.
g_t_stock-dispo = 'DEI'.
g_t_stock-matnr = '00100833'.
g_t_stock-maktx = 'SAC (300X400)'.
g_t_stock-kunnr = '0000600431'.
g_t_stock-werks = 'PF71'.
g_t_stock-labst = '7727'.
g_t_stock-vkorg = 'SF71'.
g_t_stock-vtweg = 'IC'.
and r_mbdat has the date range as
r_mbdat-sign = I
r_mbdat-option = BT
r_mbdat-low = 15.05.2008
r_mbdat-high = 08.06.2008
In vbak vbap & marc tables i have only one record as per the above selection criteria.
in VBBE table i have 7 records which satisfies the above criteria. But the select staement retrieves only 5 records.
if we remove for all entries and hardcode the values in the select statement then it retrieves all 7 records.
can anybody help me.
what is the reason it is showing only 5 records.

Hi all
actually it has to retrieve the following records
VBELN      MATNR    KUNNR WERKS MBDAT    LABST
30001417     00100833     600431 PF71   15.05.2008   20.000
30001417     00100833     600431 PF71   15.05.2008   20.000
30001417     00100833     600431 PF71   22.05.2008   5.000
30001417     00100833     600431 PF71   22.05.2008   7.000
30001417     00100833     600431 PF71   27.05.2008 10.000
30001417     00100833     600431 PF71   27.05.2008 10.000
30001417     00100833     600431 PF71   29.05.2008 10.000
But it is retrieving only 5 records as below
VBELN      MATNR    KUNNR WERKS MBDAT    LABST
30001417     00100833     600431 PF71   15.05.2008   20.000
30001417     00100833     600431 PF71   22.05.2008   5.000
30001417     00100833     600431 PF71   22.05.2008   7.000
30001417     00100833     600431 PF71   27.05.2008 10.000
30001417     00100833     600431 PF71   29.05.2008 10.000
Please give the reason

Problem with FOR ALL ENTRIES IN

This is my simple source code.
TABLES: stpo.
DATA: t_stpo      LIKE stpo OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
t_stpo_itm      LIKE stpo OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
t_stpo-stlnr = '00000058'.
t_stpo-stlkn = '00000003'.
append t_stpo.
t_stpo-stlnr = '00000058'.
t_stpo-stlkn = '00000007'.
append t_stpo.
SELECT * FROM stpo INTO TABLE t_stpo_itm
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_stpo
WHERE stlnr = t_stpo-stlnr        " BOM No.
AND stlkn <> t_stpo-stlkn.       " BOM item node number
The output from this source including BOM item node number 00000003, 00000007 but at SQL stlkn <> t_stpo-stlkn doesn't effected.
Could Anyone please tell me why?
Are there something wrong?
Thank you in advance.

Hi,
You can also Use ranges for Stlnr and Stlkn fields, instead of int table.
TABLES: stpo.
DATA: begin of t_stpo OCCURS 0.
              stlnr like stpo-stlnr,
              stlkn like stpo-stlkn,
              end of t_stpo.
data t_stpo_itm LIKE stpo OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
t_stpo-stlnr = '00000058'.
t_stpo-stlkn = '00000003'.
append t_stpo.
clear t_stpo.
t_stpo-stlnr = '00000058'.
t_stpo-stlkn = '00000007'.
append t_stpo.
clear t_stpo.
if not t_stpo[] is initial.
SELECT * FROM stpo INTO TABLE t_stpo_itm
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_stpo
WHERE stlnr = t_stpo-stlnr " BOM No.
AND stlkn <> t_stpo-stlkn. " BOM item node number
endif.
or you can simply write a select for STPO like this:
SELECT * FROM stpo INTO TABLE t_stpo_itm
WHERE stlnr = '00000058' " BOM No.
AND ( stlkn <> '00000007' or stlkn <> '00000003' ). " BOM item node number
regards,
Anji

What is the use of for all entries in select statement

what is the use of for all entries in select statement

hi,
FOR ALL ENTRIES is an effective way of doing away with using JOIN on two tables.
You can check the below code -
SELECT BUKRS BELNR GJAHR AUGDT
FROM BSEG
INTO TABLE I_BSEG
WHERE BUKRS = ....
SELECT BUKRS BELNR BLART BLDAT
FROM BKPF
INTO TABLE I_BKPF
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN I_BSEG
WHERE BUKRS = I_BSEG-BUKRS
AND BELNR = I_BSEG-BELNR
AND BLDAT IN SO_BLDAT.
*******************************8
look another example
what is the use of FOR ALL ENTRIES
1. INNER JOIN
DBTAB1 <----
> DBTAB2
It is used to JOIN two DATABASE tables
having some COMMON fields.
2. Whereas
For All Entries,
DBTAB1 <----
> ITAB1
is not at all related to two DATABASE tables.
It is related to INTERNAL table.
3. If we want to fetch data
from some DBTABLE1
but we want to fetch
for only some records
which are contained in some internal table,
then we use for alll entries.
1. simple example of for all entries.
2. NOTE THAT
In for all entries,
it is NOT necessary to use TWO DBTABLES.
(as against JOIN)
3. use this program (just copy paste)
it will fetch data
from T001
FOR ONLY TWO COMPANIES (as mentioned in itab)
4
REPORT abc.
DATA : BEGIN OF itab OCCURS 0,
bukrs LIKE t001-bukrs,
END OF itab.
DATA : t001 LIKE TABLE OF t001 WITH HEADER LINE.
itab-bukrs = '1000'.
APPEND itab.
itab-bukrs = '1100'.
APPEND itab.
SELECT * FROM t001
INTO TABLE t001
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN itab
WHERE bukrs = itab-bukrs.
LOOP AT t001.
WRITE :/ t001-bukrs.
ENDLOOP.
Hope this helps!
Regards,
Anver
<i>if hlped pls mark points</i>

Select ....FOR ALL ENTRIES.... performance tuning

I have the following SELECT statement:
SELECT recn, recnroot, ippers
     INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE <ITAB1>
   FROM CCIHT_IP
      FOR ALL ENTRIES IN <ITAB2>
WHERE ippers = <ITAB2>-ippers
      AND valfr LE sy-datum
      AND valto GE sy-datum
      AND iptype = 'INJ'.
Did a trace, and the SQL executed is:
SELECT recn, recroot, ippers
   FROM CCIHT_IP
WHERE mandt= ?
     AND ippers IN (?1, ..., ?10)
     AND valfr <= ?
     AND valto >= ?
     AND iptype = ?
     FOR FETCH ONLY WITH UR
This is very slow.
To speed it up, I programmatically break up the SQL using a range table:
i.e.:   WHERE ...
             AND IPPERS IN <RANGE TABLE>
    With the range table containing 1500 entries which is near the limit for IN statement. This is much faster.
The question is why with the FOR ALL ENTRIES the IN statement contains only 10 values and not the maximum allowed, is this a database config issue ?

Hi,
as Thomas said for this case rsdb/max_in_blocking_factor is the parameter in question.
And yes, Andrew, you are right, FAE parameters should not be changed system wide
since the delivered default values are those values that turned out to be the best values
in systemwide tests.
However you can increase the value on statement level with a hint. So you can have both
the FAE and a non default blocking for a specific statement.
example:
SELECT recn, recnroot, ippers
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE <ITAB1>
FROM CCIHT_IP
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN <ITAB2>
WHERE ippers = <ITAB2>-ippers
AND valfr LE sy-datum
AND valto GE sy-datum
AND iptype = 'INJ'
%_hints db2 '&max_blocking_factor 500&&max_in_blocking_factor 500&u2019.
Use with care.
Kind regards,
Hermann

Regarding 'Select .... for all entries' statement

Hi experts,
Can anyone suggest me that whether we can use two internal tables in 'Select .... for all entries' statement?

Hi,
You can use ranges instead of second for all entries.
Eg:
Say for example i need to write selec statement using fields from two int tables in where conidition namely itab1, itab2.
RANGES: r_vbeln FOR wa_tab1-vbeln.
LOOP AT itab1 INTO wa_tab1.
r_vbeln-sign = 'I'.
r_vbeln-option = 'EQ'.
r_vbeln-low = wa_tab1-vbeln.
APPEND r_vbeln.
ENDLOOP.
SELECT * FROM vbap INTO TABLE itab3
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN itab2
WHERE vbeln IN r_vbeln "range contains all vbeln from the table itab1
AND matwa = itab2-matwa.
Hope this helps you.
Regards,
Manoj Kumar P

Nested statement "for all entries in"

Hi,
is ist possiple to nest "for all entries in" statements ?
At the moment I have the following SELECT-Statement:
select * from /rtc/tm_inusk
          appending table gt_zrtc4inusk
          for all entries in lt_trkorrdesti
            where trkorr = lt_trkorrdesti-trkorr and
                  objname in lv_selk_copy.
Sometimes the statement dumps because the range table "lv_selk_copy" is to big.
In another thread I was told to use "for all entries in" instead of a range when the range is to big.
If do so I have to use two "for all entries in" statements in my select. But I think this is not possible.
So any idea ?
Thanks
Arnfried

Hi,
Using two for all entries in not possible... Its better that you split up your range into smaller chunks..
or..
select * from /rtc/tm_inusk
appending table gt_zrtc4inusk
for all entries in lt_trkorrdesti
where trkorr = lt_trkorrdesti-trkorr .
Once you have selected delete the records where objname Not in lv_selk_copy.

FOR ALL ENTRIES IN Problem

Hello,
probably it is a silly problem, but can anybody tell me why this FOR ALL ENTRIES IN statement does not fill all the columns of my internal table?
At the end of the report only the columns LGOBE contains values.
data itab type zmm_t_alv.
select mardmatnr mardwerks mardlgort mardlabst
maktspras maktmaktx
into corresponding fields of table itab
from mard inner join makt
    on mardmatnr = maktmatnr
where makt~spras = 'D'.
select lgobe
into corresponding fields of table itab
from t001l
for all entries in itab
where t001l~werks = itab-werks.
break-point.
Thanks,
Manuel

Please read the documentation aboutr for all entries
For all entries selects all records from a db table which correspond to the entries in an internal table, the result must be stored in a different table.
Otherwise use a loop at itab.
   select single ...
   modify itab
   endloop
Be careful with empty For all entries tables, it behave like a ranges table, no entry means no restriction and you get all records from the db table. That is a different behavior than the loop above.
Use   field1 field2 ... in corresponding fields of ....
If you specify only one field then you get only one result.
If you want one the field 'lgobe' then use into wa-lgobe and not the much slower into corresponding!
Siegfried

For all entries against Ranges

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for