For Users of WRT350N - My experience

For all you WRT350N Users out there, I thought I'd post my experience and tips gained over the past 7-8 months using the WRT350N since my WRT54G died.
I purchased the WRT350N obviously as a replacement for the WRT54G with extremely high expectations. Though I did not have any -N equipment as yet, I was planning on it. I did like the fact that it had the USB port. It was also a Linksys product so I expected the same good, reliable experience with it as I had in the past. I was upgrading some of my home office equipment and wanted to embrace wireless for all my peripherals (ie. get rid of the wires).
In the beginning, it was hell.
I suffered from all kinds of bizarre and cryptic events. The WRT350N was at 1.03.2. I had all manners of dropped internet connections, extremely poor wireless performance (WEP and B/G Mode). You've read the threads, I've experienced them all. I almost threw the unit out in total frustration. I upgraded to 1.03.7 about a month after purchase following the procedure outlined by other contributors on this forum...(You must follow the instructions to the letter).
Since then, the unit has worked as advertised in wired modes: internet connection has been solid and stable with no re-boots. The wireless piece has been a bugger running WEP and in B or G... still had 54MB/s when close to the WRT350N but this dropped considerably when the wireless device was moved to other parts of the house.
Well, I fixed the problem... and wireless piece is now running at 270MB/s (-N Mode) flawlessly throughout my house. See below.
So, what have I learned and is it of any use to anyone else?
First off, everyone's configurations, equipment, environment, needs and expectations are different, so take the following with a grain of salt. This is my experience.
My Network and stuff:
Cable Broadband - Cable modem
DellXPS-3.4Ghz (Desktop), 1 TeraByte drives configured for RAID 0, 1 GB Network card, lot's of USB devices hanging off it - everything running on MS XP - System is wired to the WRT350N.
Dell8100-1.5Ghz (Desktop), 500GB Drives, 1GB Network card and a bunch of peripherals - everything running on MS XP - System is wired to the WRT350N.
1 Terabyte USB External Drive used primarily for backups. Originally purchased to hang off the USB port of the WRT350N as a quasi-network drive... It can be configured and it does work. However, I had trouble with Norton Ghost 12 doing backups to the drive via the 350N USB port. I removed it from the 350N USB port and re-attached it to a spare DELL XPS USB port - no problems since. I also have a number of printers, three of which are directly connected to the Desktops.
I purchased a HP Photosmart C8180 All-in-one (good unit BTW) as a network (wired or wireless) color printer and for photo printing etc. It worked intermittently with the 350N when configured for wireless using WEP and in B/G mode. The printer, unfortunately does not support wireless in -N mode using WPA2 Personal-AES. So it is now wired with network connection at 1 GB.
Dell Latitude D600 Laptop... Frustrating!!! With the on-board Intel Wireless B/G, I never really got consistent, solid network or Internet connections via the 350N. It worked poorly with the 350N - wireless. It worked fine wired to the 350N.
Solution: I disabled the on-board Intel Wireless and purchased a Linksys WPC300N - It is a -N device. I really crossed my fingers with this purchase. Well, the card works. I get solid, repeatable wireless connection to the Network/Internet anywhere in the house at 270MB/s. I have had absolutely no interference from any of my neighbor's B and G routers. I have yet to experience any degradation in speed or signal. Use: WPA2 Personal-AES for security. Faster than all the other settings I've tried.
So the 350N works in my case, as advertised. My first -N appliance - the WPC300N card for the Dell laptop also works as advertised. I haven't hooked up XBox or fully utilized/explored all the other features nor have I set up the router for VPN (one step at a time).
So here's what I have in the configuration:
Under SETUP/Basic Setup: Internet Connection Type: Automatic configuration - DHCP
DHCP Server: Enabled - Use DHCP Reservation and assign your devices (MAC Addresses) to IPs
Under SETUP/MAC Address Clone: Enable. My DELL XPS MAC is cloned here (Must do)
Under SETUP/Advanced Routing:NAT Enabled
Under Wireless/Basic Wireless Settings:
Network Mode: Mixed (b/g/n)
Network Name (SSID): Put your SSID here (anything other that linksys!) Radio Band: Wide - 40MHz Channel
Wide Channel: 3
Standard Channel: 1 - 2.412GHz
SSID Broadcast: Enabled
I've experimented with the Auto settings here... it works but I got better results in my case with the above.
Under Wireless/Wireless Security: Security Mode: WPA2 Personal
Encryption: AES
Passphrase: I put a name in here
Key Renewal: The default I believe is 3600 (works). I put in 7200 (works)
Under Wireless/Wireless MAC Filter: (Kind of up to you. For added security, I enabled it and put in my Laptop and other wireless devices MAC addresses here.
Wireless MAC Filter: Enabled
Access Restriction : Permit PCs listed below to access the wireless network.
MAC Address Filter List : Fill out your applicable MAC addresses here. Under Wireless/Advanced Wireless Settings: AP Isolation: Disabled
Frame Burst: Enabled
Authentication Type: (Default: Auto)
Basic Rate: (Default: Default)
Transmission Rate: (Default: Auto)
N Transmission Rate: (Default: Auto)
CTS Protection Mode: (Default: Auto)
Beacon Interval: 50
DTIM Interval: 1
Fragmentation Threshold: 2307
RTS Threshold: 2306
Under Security/Firewall:
Firewall-SPI Firewall Protection: Enabled Everything else - default
Under Storage: I had this configured to handle my USB Terabyte drive but since decoupled it for other reasons. It works and has worked as a Network drive in my case.
Under Access Restrictions: I left everything default here.
Under Applications and Gaming: I have done nothing here. Can't advise on port forwarding or the like.
Under Administration: Everything here is vanilla except under Management I have enabled Upnp.
Hope this helps someone.
Cheers!

My WRT350N has given me very little trouble, however the storage link does not work that great. I definitly like the WRT350 router over my old WRT300. Thanks for the tips and info. I just wished that LInksys came out with firmware updates for there products more often that fixed bugs.

Similar Messages

  • A "FIX" for Users of PC Suite 6.83 and Removing th...

    To conduct the fix immediately, just skip down to about the 3rd paragraph below called "The FIX" for me! This other stuff is some backgroung I wanted to give.
    Bottomline...6.83 has a serious problem when you istall it, and I spoke with a Nokia technical rep 2 days ago and he confirmed it. Unfortunately, Nokia doesn't have a clue to what is the root cause problem. The Nokia rep recommended that I "NOT" use version 6.83. Since they are having so many issues with it, I don't understand why they don't just remove it from their website? No matter what you try you will not get it to work properly!
    Now when you try to uninstall 6.83, you also get into trouble. You can unistall the PC Suite 6.83 core application , but the cable driver portion remains. Now when you try to remove the cable driver, under ADD / REMOVE Programs, you get the following error" The feature you are trying to use is on a network resource that is unavailable". Again, the Nokia rep was clueless as to why I was receiving the error message and had no additional help for me in removing the cable driver. It just seemed no matter what I tried I could not remove the cable driver nor could I reinstall PC Suite either version 6.83 or 6.82. Finally, last night I stumbled upon a note from another digruntled nokia 6.83 user that led me to search the following Microsoft info regarding a little program called "Windows Installer Cleanup Utility".
    My setup:
    Phone - Nokia 9300
    Cable - Nokia DKU-2
    PC Suite - 6.83
    PC OS - Win XP SP2
    "THE FIX" for me:
    1. Go to (ADD / Remove Programs) and uninstall PC Suite 6.83. This only removes the core program and "not" the cable driver
    2. Now go to the following MS website and download and Run the "Windows Installer Cleanup Utility".
    (http://download.microsoft.com/download/e/9/d/e9d80355-7ab4-45b8-80e8-983a48d5e1bd/msicuu2.exe)
    Once you download this small MS utility, go down to my item #3 below for further immediate instructions!
    Article ID : 290301
    Last Review : November 13, 2006
    Revision : 5.1
    This article was previously published under Q290301
    Warning The Windows Installer CleanUp Utility is provided "as is" to help resolve installation problems for programs that use Microsoft Windows Installer. If you use this utility, you may have to reinstall other programs. Caution is advised.
    On This Page
    SUMMARY
    Microsoft has updated the Windows Installer CleanUp Utility. With the Windows Installer CleanUp Utility, you can remove a program's Windows Installer configuration information. You may want to remove the Windows Installer configuration information for your program if you experience installation (Setup) problems. For example, you may have to remove a program's Windows Installer configuration information if you have installation problems when you try to add (or remove) a component of your program that was not included when you first installed your program.
    The Windows Installer CleanUp Utility does not perform the following functions: • Remove Windows Installer
    • Remove files of any programs that are installed by Windows Installer, such as Microsoft Office 2003
    The Windows Installer CleanUp Utility does perform the following functions: • Provides a dialog box in which you can select one or more programs that were installed by Windows Installer
    To do this, select the programs that you want in the Installed Products list in the Windows Installer CleanUp dialog box. After you make this selection, the utility removes only the Windows Installer configuration information that is related to those programs.
    • Removes the files and registry settings that make up the Windows Installer configuration information for programs that you select
    If you use this utility to remove the Windows Installer configuration information for your program and you plan to reinstall the program, you should reinstall the program in the same folder where you originally installed it. This prevents duplication of files on your hard disk or disks.
    Back to the top
    MORE INFORMATION
    This version of the Windows Installer CleanUp Utility works correctly in all 32-bit versions of Microsoft Windows. The 32-bit versions of Microsoft Windows are as follows: • Microsoft Windows Vista
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2003
    • Microsoft Windows XP
    • Microsoft Windows Millennium Edition
    • Microsoft Windows 2000
    • Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 with Service Pack 3 or later
    • Microsoft Windows 98
    • Microsoft Windows 95
    This version of the Windows Installer CleanUp Utility works correctly in all 64-bit versions of Microsoft Windows. The 64-bit versions of Microsoft Windows are as follows:• Microsoft Windows Server 2003
    • Microsoft Windows XP
    • Microsoft Windows Vista
    The following file is available for download from the Microsoft Download Center:
    Download the Windows Installer Cleanup Utility package now. (http://download.microsoft.com/download/e/9/d/e9d80355-7ab4-45b8-80e8-983a48d5e1bd/msicuu2.exe)
    Back to the top
    3. Now go to START/PROGRAMS/Windows Installer Cleanup Utility. When you run this utility, a window will open up that lists all the of the programs that you have installed. It looks a little bit like the add/remove program window. Now Select the "Nokia Connectivity Cable Driver" and the "PC Connectivity Solution programs, then run the utility. It only takes about 15-30 seconds to run.
    4. Now go back to the Add /Remove Programs in Control Panel and try and remove "Nokia Connectivity Cable Driver" and the "PC Connectivity Solution programs now. They should now uninstall!
    5. Next I restarted my computer.
    6. DO NOT install 6.83!!!!
    7. Now go to Nokia website and download PC Suite version 6.82_rel_22:
    http://nds1.nokia.com/files/support/global/phones/software/Nokia_PC_Suite_682_rel_22_0_eng_us_web.ms...
    7. You should now be back in business with a working version of PC Suite.
    It is obvious that there is a serious issue with the cable driver portion of 6.83 that corrupts MS Windows Installer program during the install process. Even though you initially can install 6.83, the cable driver is messed up. Also, you can't then uninstall the cable driver unless you run the Windows Installer Cleanup Utility.
    After a month of fighting this issue, the Windows Installer Cleanup utility was the key to clearing the conflict of the cable driver. Unfortunately, 6.83 has a serious issue with the cable driver.
    Good luck everyone...Sorry for being long winded!

    Hi diving_catch
    Just wanted to say a big thank you as a large number of forum members are having grief over this one!
    Might I add that I was happily using 6.82 rel_22.0 until NSU decided that it was time to update........you guessed PCSuite no longer worked. On Xp I uninstalled PC Suite + Nokia Connectivity Driver, installed and ran Nokia PC Suite Cleaner - option clean-up computer, rebooted and at least for now 6.83 v14.1 seems to function with N95. As no updates are available yet I haven't installed Nokia Software Updater!
    Many thanks also for the link to PC Suite 6.82 rel_22.0 as I shall probably need this soon.
    Interesting for Nokia comment as it's successor is currently out beta testing!
    Happy to have helped forum in a small way with a Support Ratio = 37.0

  • Deployment issue - Login failed for user 'NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE'

    I am attempting to deploy a site from my development PC to my server. I have no issues running the site on the server using VS2010 Express Web in debug. All page queries are working within the debugger. The connection strings are identical between the PC
    and Server, except the host name.
    connectionString
    ="Data
    Source=SOCIALSERVER;Initial Catalog=Intake_be;Integrated Security=True"
    However, when using the site normally via IIS, the pages containing data access are failing with a permissions problem. The non-data access pages render normally.
    Login failed for user 'NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE'
    Looking at the SQL2005 instance via SQL Management Studio, I see security folder with Logins under the Server. NTA\NS is listed as a user login. But, I also see similar folders under each
    of 3 databases. NTA\NS is not listed as a login specific to my target dB.
    My site is for internal (intranet) use only. There is no internet access into my IIS. This is my first deployment into production. I think I only need Windows Authentication but I lack the experience to make a good decision. My goal is to allow domain users
    to access pages that produce read only data. But, I also need controlled access to pages that can modify data. I used the native winform template for ASP.NET 4, which includes some roles based security.
    How do I grant permissions for internal users on the pages that access SQL data? How does that security model work with the native roles based security? i.e.
    add
    name="AspNetSqlMembershipProvider"type="System.Web.Security.SqlMembershipProvider"connectionStringName="ApplicationServices"...
    etc.
    Thanks for your time and patience on this Deployment 101 type issue.
    Kurt

    hi,
    You receive either of these error messages specifically when you use integrated security.
    To resolve you can use one of below.
    Method 1: Programmatically change the security context of the ASP.NET worker process to a user who has the correct SQL Server permissions.
    Method 2: Change the default configuration of ASP.NET so that the ASP.NET worker process starts and runs under the context of a user who has the correct permissions in SQL Server.
    Method 3: Grant the correct permissions in SQL Server so that the ASPNET account (or NetworkService account, for an application that runs on IIS 6.0) has the appropriate access to the required resources.(Go to the Computer Management >> Local User and
    Groups >> Groups >> Right Click and go to properties on IIS_IUSRS >> Add appropriate user.
    Thanx, Mark as answered if you are ok ..

  • Need help for user exit mereq001

    Hi,
    I need help for user exit mereq001. I think I messed up with include table CI_EBANDB and CI_EBANMEM. And When I tried to check the syntax . It gives me error like : <b>Class IF_PURCHASE_REQUISITION. Inconsistency in the dictionary for the structure mereq_item_s_cust_data.</b> Anyone had experience for this exit? I just need to extract costcenter information of the each item from the requisition and block the requisiton if the costcenter are differents from each other before the requisition is saved. Any one has idea about it?
    Thanks.

    biao,
    Have you checked this struture consistency from SE11. Also check the activation log.
    If there are any errors and you are not able to rectify the same use RSDDCHECK program, give your table name and run the report.
    This will list down the error structures releated this table and also prompts for you to activate it.
    Regds
    Manohar

  • ADF security - prompt for user id and password again on page forward

    Hi,
    I am working with ADF using JDeveloper 10.1.3 with Business Components and ADF Faces.
    I have a Search page and a List page.
    Both pages are based on the same view within the same application module.
    The Search page is using the default Find and Execute Operations.
    The Execute button has an action that navigate to the List screen.
    faces-config.xml
    <navigation-rule>
    <from-view-id>/jspx/search.jspx</from-view-id>
    <navigation-case>
    <from-outcome>search</from-outcome>
    <to-view-id>/jspx/list.jspx</to-view-id>
    <redirect/>
    </navigation-case>
    </navigation-rule>
    <navigation-rule>
    <from-view-id>/jspx/list.jspx</from-view-id>
    <navigation-case>
    <from-outcome>find</from-outcome>
    <to-view-id>/jspx/search.jspx</to-view-id>
    <redirect/>
    </navigation-case>
    </navigation-rule>
    Security (Roles and Users) is based on the jazn-data.xml and web.xml
    URL Patterns for the pages have assigned to the role.
    Login Configuration is HTTP Digest Authentication
    <web-resource-collection>
    <web-resource-name>APP_SUPPORT</web-resource-name>
    <url-pattern>faces/jspx/search.jspx</url-pattern>
    <url-pattern>faces/jspx/list.jspx</url-pattern>
    </web-resource-collection>
    <auth-constraint>
    <role-name>APP_SUPPORT</role-name>
    </auth-constraint>
    <login-config>
    <auth-method>DIGEST</auth-method>
    </login-config>
    Everything is fine when running the application from JDeveloper,
    but when the application is deployed to the server (OC4J),
    After logging into the system, the Search page prompt for user id and password again
    on click of the Execute button.
    Have anyone experience this problem before?
    Thanks for any help.
    Jim

    Hi,
    does the same thing happen if you change your protected resource from:
    <web-resource-collection>
    <web-resource-name>APP_SUPPORT</web-resource-name>
    <url-pattern>faces/jspx/search.jspx</url-pattern>
    <url-pattern>faces/jspx/list.jspx</url-pattern>
    </web-resource-collection>to:
    <web-resource-collection>
    <web-resource-name>APP_SUPPORT</web-resource-name>
    <url-pattern>/faces/jspx/*</url-pattern>
    </web-resource-collection>Brenden

  • BizTalk Powershell Provider Mount remote BizTalk drive: Login failed for user 'NT AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS LOGON'

    I've been dabbling in the Powershell BizTalk Provider Extensions for some automation of deployment and such. So far it's pretty cool on a local machine, but the real benefits to me would be to do it remotely. Does anyone have any experience in the with the
    following issue?
    My BizTalk Server and SQL Servers are on separate machines which I think is the issue, but I don't know how to resolve. I've tried to provided credentials to the New-PSDrive command, but get the following errors:
    The provider does not support the use of credentials. Perform the operation again without specifying credentials.
    I'm trying to manage a remote BizTalk instance. The machine running the script has biztalk fully configured and can connect
    to the Target Server just fine. The issue comes when I try to mount the "BizTalk:" drive
    Enter-pssession -computername myServer -configurationname microsoft.powershell32
    $InitializeDefaultBTSDrive = $false;
    Remove-PSSnapin -Name BizTalkfactory.PowerShell.Extensions;
    Add-PSSnapin -Name BizTalkfactory.PowerShell.Extensions;
    New-PSDrive -Name BizTalk -PSProvider BizTalk -Root "BizTalk:\" -Instance mySqlServer -Database BizTalkMgmtDb -Scope Global
    When it get to the New-PSDrive I get the following error:
    New-PSDrive : Login failed for user 'NT AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS LOGON'.
    + CategoryInfo : InvalidArgument: (BizTalk:PSDriveInfo) [New-PSDrive], BtsException
    + FullyQualifiedErrorId : 0,Microsoft.PowerShell.Commands.NewPSDriveCommand
    Has anyone experienced this and solved? The same error occurs when use Invoke-Command as well.

    It seems that the PowerShell provider is not Microsoft Support, it is community supported through the CodePlex site -
    http://psbiztalk.codeplex.com
    Right, I posted there as well, but there is not much movement on the site. I was hoping to find if this larger community may have had some experience with the provider.

  • EAP TLS for machine and EAP PEAP for user

    Hi forum
    I am doing a design to use ISE to enforece dot1x for corporate machinese on both wired and wireless.
    Due to the particular environment, we will need to use EAP-TLS for machines auth and on top of that use EAP-PEAP for user auth with windows credential and posture for full access.
    Just wondering if anyone has done this before:
    1. Will this work?
    2. Any gottas?
    3. what is the user experience like?
    All machines are win7 based.
    Thanks

    You can not use the native supplicant for this. Cisco Anyconnect NAM will allow you to use this method. It is very simple to configure and deploy.
    Tarik Admani
    *Please rate helpful posts*

  • NoMachine(freenx) Authentication failed for user (MYUSERNAME)

    Hi all,
    I have quite a few experience with freenx on other linux distributions, but this is my first time setting up freenx on archlinux. After following the instructions in the wiki, authentication keeps failing no matter what I do.
    Stuff I've done from the wiki:
    1. install freenx
    2. add RSAAuthentication yes AllowUsers someuser nx to sshd_config
    3. add md5sum to node.conf
    4. pacman -S xdialog xterm
    5. run "/usr/bin/nxsetup --install --setup-nomachine-key"
    6. modify /etc/nxserver/node.conf so that "USER_X_STARTUP_SCRIPT=.xinitrc"
    7. pick the right configurations when connecting to my server
    I have "exec startxfce4" in .xinitrc.
    It always goes up to "Waiting for authentication" and then "Authentication failed for user (MYUSERNAME)" pops up. I think it should not be a XFCE issue since authentication itself didn't even pass. I assume if it is a X window problem, what I would get is something like a blank screen.
    I'm using public key, so I didn't really copy anything from the server to my client.
    I couldn't think of a second reason why this wouldn't work. Is there any thing obvious that I missed? (If so, please move this thread to the newbie corner. lol)
    Any thoughts would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Aweather

    Hi,
    I did update the password in the properties file but still I get the error
    BUILD FAILED
    C:\product\10.1.3.1\OracleAS_1\bpel\samples\utils\CreditRatingService\build.xml:
    79: Authentication failed for user "oc4jadmin" on host
    I am able to deploy from JDEV. and could configure as per documentation
    Thanks in advance,
    Anand
    I had to update the <OH>/bpel/utilities/ant-orabpel.properties file for the password and now I can deploy successfully...information was there in the readme file...
    Anand
    Message was edited by:
    AnandP

  • RE: (forte-users) Does anyone have experience using OracleLarge Objects

    hi ,
    A few months ago, I tried a oracle stored procedure with a BLOB parameter,
    but Forte(3.l2) could not recognize the blob variable. I used oracle 8.0
    hth
    suma
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Amin, Kamran [mailto:kamran.aminlendware.com]
    Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 2:40 PM
    To: 'Forte User Group'
    Cc: Magaliff, Bill
    Subject: (forte-users) Does anyone have experience using Oracle Large
    Objects (LOB's)?
    Does anyone have experience using Oracle Large Objects (LOB's) -
    specifically the CLOB datatype? Forte supports Oracle LONG's but given that
    Oracle is going to phase out that datatype and they're trying to push users
    towards CLOB's instead of LONG's, I want to find out if Forte can handle it
    and, if so, what we should know about mapping Forte datatypes to the Oracle
    CLOB. [Their compatibility matrix for v3.5 indicates suppport under Oracle
    8.1.x, and CLOB's were introduced back in 8.0.x - but the word from Forte is
    that they currently don't support it.]
    thanks in advance.
    ka
    For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
    the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
    email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

    Hi,
    Did you get any solution to this. If yes, please share.
    Thanks,
    Tints

  • No valid requester found for user 0013 . BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER    Posted: Jan

    Hi,
    We have a PDP scenario where a channel R/3 has the RFCUSER maintained and the link is established with the ECC6.0.
    When we try to send the PR to SRM the message shows the the PR is transferred but gives an error in the SLG1 as
    "No valid requester found for user 0013
    Message no. BBP_BD002"
    The SMQ1 status is ANORETRY
    TYPE : A
    ID : BBP_EXTREQ
    NUMBER : 013
    MESSAGE : Ext. requirement cannot be created, see application log.
    If you have any solution please tell me,.
    i am waiting for reply,
    Thanks in advance.

    Santosh,
    In my recent experience this SLG1 error is usually due to the RFC user being either missing, locked or not having their password set.
    Get your Basis person to check the RFC link relevant to the transfer process in TCode SM59.
    Hope this helps
    Allen Brooks
    SRM BPO
    Sunderland City Council

  • HU02 - restrict delete option for user

    Hello
    Does anyone know, from an authorization perspective, if I can restrict a user who has HU02 tcode, and btw only HU02 tcode exists in the role, from deleting a handling unit.
    I've unchecked both the options Create & Delete in the role yet the user is able to delete units.
    I ran a trace to see if there are any objects but all I saw in the trace was bunch of other tcodes that were run in the back ground.
    thanks
    Raj

    In some cases, where it is considered not critical I guess, the application will not make all the checks you want. It might assume that the user has already passed other checks, which will then determine what can be sent to HU02.
    In these cases, I think it is fair to assume that another transaction calling this one should take care of more granular authority - even if not perfect. But that activity checks are missing, seems a bit extreme.
    Ideally, it is always better and easier to implement authorization security if the user has the same experience, regardless of how they get there (whether the tcode is present or not makes little difference in these cases - it is just an upfront check).
    Either reconsider your choice of transaction (look for a different one) or open a message with SAP to tighten the checks in the core transaction.
    If the user can start reports directly, they will anyway hose your tcode security (due to the above assumptions of authority checks being located in the correct places).
    Cheers,
    Julius
    Edited by: Julius Bussche on Nov 17, 2008 11:18 PM

  • Do open fonts work in Word for users without the font on their machine?

    Our team creates documents in Word and we would like to use an Open Font (Adobe Jenson Pro)--there is quite a bit of internal file-sharing and I don't want the font to switch to something ugly when it is reviewed in Word (because Word users do not have this font installed by default). I know that there is some cross-compatibility. We would like to apply this font to the template and don't want to introduce a font issue. anyone with experience know how if this works with the Open Font in word documents for users without it installed? 
    thanks!!
    Anne

    annecroft wrote:
    Thanks for your expertise. You are a little snarky, aren't you?
    The coffee hasn't kicked in yet.
    Open TYPE fonts are Adobe fonts
    Nope. OTF's are made by many different companies. Adobe DOES have many of them yes but they don't rule the market on them.

  • Waiting for user logon...

    Hi,
    we're currently experiencing issues with random applications refusing to install with the message 'Waiting for user logon'. I'm seeing this in Software Center so obviously someone is logged on. It doesn't seem to matter if I'm logged in via RDP or directly
    on the pc. I've gone through the basics with the deployment monitoring tool and skimmed through some logs but nothing jumps out.
    I have to admit, I don't know a lot about sccm 2012 as it's no longer my area so my experience and training is mostly limited to sms / sccm 2007. I do know that the current guys running know very little and anything that doesn't work is a "known microsoft
    issue" - only they can never point you to a KB. I now work mostly in remediation of legacy apps to win 7 / x64 but being as it's not installing it's considered broken so naturally it has become my problem.
    Any help with this would be greatly appreciated!

    I attempted a CCMRepair on this client, and it didn't make a difference. I haven't yet uninstalled and reinstalled the client completely yet. 
    The CcmExec log shows (every time user logs in), that there's a login detected, and it shows it on session 2:
    Registering for Logon/Logoff notifications.
    Found user S-1-5-21-4083790691-3944967354-608316658-65900 on session 2
    Added CCM (user, session) is: (S-1-5-21-4083790691-3944967354-608316658-65900,2).
    No cached user during RegisterForLogon.
    New CCM (user, session) is: (S-1-5-21-4083790691-3944967354-608316658-65900,2).
    User 'S-1-5-21-4083790691-3944967354-608316658-65900' is logged on to session 2 during RegisterForLogon.
    Watching the other sccm logs as it attempts to install this application that's currently Waiting for User Logon, it essentially does this several times a second for a while. This is 10 minutes after the login log noted above. It is showing the correct
    user SID, but no session (-1). The logs were merged chronologically, and the log is noted at the end of each line where it came from.
    State message(State ID : 2002) with TopicType 1702 and TopicId MyVendorId/RequiredApplication_4a14ecbe-f411-41a6-b096-d0625d462d25/5 has been recorded for S-1-5-21-4083790691-3944967354-608316658-65900
    StateMessage
    The target instance path is CCM_Application.Id="MyVendorId/Application_4a14ecbe-f411-41a6-b096-d0625d462d25",Revision="5",IsMachineTarget=0
    CCMSDKProviderRaising client SDK event for class CCM_Application, instance CCM_Application.Id="MyVendorId/Application_4a14ecbe-f411-41a6-b096-d0625d462d25",Revision="5",IsMachineTarget=0,
    actionType 23l, value , user S-1-5-21-4083790691-3944967354-608316658-65900, session 4294967295l, level 0l, verbosity 30l
    CIAgentState message with TopicType 1702 and TopicId MyVendorId/Application_4a14ecbe-f411-41a6-b096-d0625d462d25/5 has been updated
    StateMessage
    The action type is 23
    CCMSDKProvider
    The user SID is S-1-5-21-4083790691-3944967354-608316658-65900
    CCMSDKProviderThe logon session ID is -1
    CCMSDKProvider
    The message level is 0
    CCMSDKProvider
    The verbosity is 30
    CCMSDKProvider
    The value is
    CCMSDKProviderJob({E9FD9460-DC59-434D-9661-45C96253174E}): Setting
    priority to 5 : Task(MyVendorId/RequiredApplication_4a14ecbe-f411-41a6-b096-d0625d462d25.5.Enforce)
    CIAgent
    CCIStateStore::SendStateMessages - ModelName: MyVendorId/RequiredApplication_4a14ecbe-f411-41a6-b096-d0625d462d25, Version:5 UserID:S-1-5-21-4083790691-3944967354-608316658-65900, Priority: 5
    CIStateStore
    CIStateStore
    An existing CI state is changed
    CIStateStore
    [MyVendorId/RequiredApplication_4a14ecbe-f411-41a6-b096-d0625d462d25:5] CIEnforceState changed: Enforcing --> WaitingForUserLogon
    CIStateStore
    [MyVendorId/RequiredApplication_4a14ecbe-f411-41a6-b096-d0625d462d25:5] AreDetailsUpdated: No
    CIStateStore
    CIStateStore
    GetAllInstances - 1302 instance(s) of 'CCM_StateMsg' found
    StateMessageProvider
    State message with TopicType 1701 and TopicId MyVendorId/RequiredApplication_4a14ecbe-f411-41a6-b096-d0625d462d25/5 has been updated
    StateMessageGetAllInstances - 1302 instance(s) of 'CCM_StateMsg' found
    StateMessageProvider
    Job({2C94A554-48CE-4CB6-9B70-6AC79B8A6B58}): Already Completed : Task(MyVendorId/RequiredApplication_4a14ecbe-f411-41a6-b096-d0625d462d25.5.Enforce)
    CIAgentCCIStateStore::SendStateMessages - ModelName: MyVendorId/RequiredApplication_4a14ecbe-f411-41a6-b096-d0625d462d25,
    Version:5 UserID:S-1-5-21-4083790691-3944967354-608316658-65900, Priority: 5
    CIStateStore
    CIStateStore
    An existing CI state is changed
    CIStateStore[MyVendorId/RequiredApplication_4a14ecbe-f411-41a6-b096-d0625d462d25:5]
    CIEnforceState changed: WaitingForUserLogon --> Enforcing
    CIStateStore[MyVendorId/RequiredApplication_4a14ecbe-f411-41a6-b096-d0625d462d25:5]
    AreDetailsUpdated: No
    CIStateStore

  • Can we disable the ability for users to sites and subsites in their SharePoint 365 Profile Site?

    We have plans to roll out a hybrid SharePoint with our profiles in the Cloud. Does anyone know if it is possible to disable the ability for users to create sites under their Profile site in the cloud? As it stands out of the box, it looks like every
    user can create as many sites as they want under their Profile. There is a concern that users will "self-service" their own solutions without going through the proper channels of governance. Has anyone had to deal with this or have experience
    on how to restrict this functionality? Thanks in advance! :)

    HI Ken,we can disable this by blocking the self service site creation option.By default its disabled.
     To disable the "Self-Service Site creation" option, just follow the steps given below:
    1.   Go to the Central admin.
    2.   Go to the "Application Management" & Select the specific web application.
    3.   Now, you can see the "Self-Service Site Creation" option in the Ribbon Menu.
    4.   Click on that Menu item and Select the "Off" option in the pop-up window
    http://expertsharepoint.blogspot.de/2014/06/your-personal-site-cannot-be-created.html
    Anil Avula[Partner,MCP,MCSE,MCSA,MCTS,MCITP,MCSM] See Me At: http://expertsharepoint.blogspot.de/

  • OWA still lands at Exchange 2010 for users migrated from Exchange 2010 to 2013

    I never had any issues with OWA redirection for a few users that I migrated from Exchange 2010-2013 initially. For users that I am migrating in the past few days, the OWA 2013 is landing on Exchange 2010 despite the mailbox being successfully migrated to
    Exchange 2013.
    Troubleshooting:
    1. I have restarted the IIS Services
    2. I have restarted MSExchangeOWAAppPool.
    3. I have also checked the homeMDB attribute of the 2013 migrated user with the Exchange 2013 database.
    I would really appreciate if anyone could share their experiences on similar issues.

    I have checked it, the migration status is completed. In regard to the namespaces, both CAS 2010 and 2013 are set to mail.domain.com; CAS 2013 is the internet facing. I have also checked the internal access for OWA, it's the same scenario. Migrating them
    back to 2010 and 2013 won't resolve the issue in my case, because the issue persists for every new user that I am migrating.
    I recently found the following when I login with a user who is not effected and then logout:
    1. Login in back with the affected user without closing the browser or clearing the cache, it lands at CAS 2013 OWA.
    2. However, I get the below listed error message when I logout. 
    Your request couldn't be completed.
    Click here to continue working.
    This may have occurred for security reasons or because your session timed out.

Maybe you are looking for