[Forum FAQ] Reduce the size of System Volume Information folder

Symptom
There is a folder called System Volume Information in the root of each drive. (Figure 1)
Sometimes, you may find the size of System Volume Information folder is too large. However,
it is not recommended to delete the files in it casually since
the System Volume information folder is
created by the Operating System and used by Windows for storing critical information related to the system configuration.
Figure 1.
Note:
The System Volume Information folder
is a hidden system folder on each drive by default, you can show the hidden files and folders before accessing it.
Cause                                                  
In general, the System Volume Information folder contains
System Restore points, Distributed Link Tracking Service databases, Content Indexing Service databases, WinFS databases and information used by the Volume
Snapshot Service.
If you enable shadow copies on a volume, more and more VSS snapshots will be created in the "System Volume Information" folder. Then the size of this folder will become
too large.
Solution                                                                                           
You can follow the steps below to free up the space of System Volume Information folder safely:        
1. Delete the GUIDs files in System Volume Information folder using DiskShadow.exe.
1) Open a command prompt with administrator privilege, then type “DiskShadow.exe” at the command prompt.
2) Type “Delete shadows OLDEST <BackupStorageLocation>”
at the command prompt.
3) Type “Exit” to exit DiskShadow.exe.
Note: Theoldestshadow
copy in the folder will be deleted each time
you run the commands. Before you run those commands, please
make sure the oldest shadow copy is not useful to you. 
2. Changing the amount of disk space available to VSS
1) Right-click on the drive you want to configure, and click “Properties”.
2) Click “Shadow Copies” and then click “Settings”. (Figure 2)
Figure 2.
3) Choose “Use limit" and type the maximum size you want to set for the shadow copies, then click “Ok”.
(Figure 3)
Figure 3.
Note: The extra shadow copies would be deleted in System Volume Information folder once you
configure the Maximum size to a lower value than before.It
will delete the older shadow copies firstly. Before you configure this setting, please make sure that you have enough space
to create shadow copies.
More Information
What's the deal with the System Volume Information folder?
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2003/11/20/55764.aspx
Backup Version and Space Management in Windows Server Backup
http://blogs.technet.com/b/filecab/archive/2009/06/22/backup-version-and-space-management-in-windows-server-backup.aspx
Please click to vote if the post helps you. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Hi,
You could choose the shadow copies tap then choose Settings and then “use Limit" put in 1024MB, OK and OK, the drive would have plenty of free space.
For more detailed information, please refer to the thread below:
Windows 2008 R2 System Volume Information too large
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/647d350f-f3a0-487d-b885-f2eaa3f029f0/windows-2008-r2-system-volume-information-too-large
Best Regards,
Mandy 
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Similar Messages

  • 'System Volume Information' folder...where does it go

    big trouble...itunes program folder was moved accidentally from c:/programfiles to an external hard drive where just the itunes library only should have been moved

    The System Volume Information folder is a hard-coded Windows system folder and cannot be permanently deleted.
    Carey Frisch

  • System volume information folder problem, it keeps reappearing

    I have already turned off the system restore for all drives and then i deleted "System volume information" folders by changing ownership but they reappeared so i deleted them again and again but they keep coming back
    Please help me . How can i permanently delete these folders?

    The System Volume Information folder is a hard-coded Windows system folder and cannot be permanently deleted.
    Carey Frisch

  • How to reduce the size of System tables(RS*) in SAP BW?

    Hi All,
    We need to reduce the size of a system tables(RS*) in SAP BW system without impacting anything to system.
    Could you please let us know is there any Global program/Function module to do the same.
    If not if you know any individual program or other way to reduce the system table size it will be very much useful.
    Sample System tables(RS*) are given below.
    RSHIENODETMP
    RSBERRORLOG
    RSHIENODETMP~0
    RSBMNODES
    RSBKDATA
    RSBMNODES~001
    RSRWBSTORE
    RSBMLOGPAR
    RSBERRORLOG~0

    Sudhakar,
    There are tables you can archive / clean up and then there are tables you cannot do anything about. For example - if your system has a million queries - the RSRREPDIR , RZCOMPDIR tables will be large.
    The tables that typically get archived are :
    1. BALDAT / BALHDR - application log tables
    2. Monitor tables - search for Request archiving which will tell you how to archive the same
    The other tables -
    First you would have to understand why they are large in the first place ... if you have too many hierarchies - then some tables can be huge - delete some of the hierarchies you do not need and the table sizes should come down.
    RSRWBSTORE - this is the internal store for workbooks - this will have the last executed version of the workbook stored in the table. This information is called when the workbook is executed without refreshing the variables - which is why you get the workbook output first and then get prompted to refresh the variables.

  • How to reduce the size of my Time Machine folder.

    My Time maching folder is extremely large with backups that go all the way back to june 2011. I obviously don't need anything from way back then. Is there any way I can limit how far back Time Machine will go too? And is there any way I can reduce the size of the folder currently?

    My Time maching folder is extremely large with backups that go all the way back to june 2011. I obviously don't need anything from way back then.
    Just to add to what has already been said, let me say that this is not at all obvious. It may seem to you now like you don't need anything from way back then, but suppose that you discover tomorrow that a very important file that you haven't thought about in some time is missing, and suppose that it turns out that it was accidentally deleted in August 2011. Those kinds of situations are what backup systems like Time Machine are designed to help protect against.
    There is no such thing as unnecessary backups, and in fact, you probably need more, not less. You should have a minimum of two separate backups, and any data that you would consider irreplaceable should be not only backed up twice but also backed up in an archive that gets put away in a closet or in a safe somewhere every so often and not touched again, to protect against corruption or accidental deletion that affects the backups as well. Multiple points of redundancy are required for true long-term data integrity!

  • How to reduce the size of SYSTEM tablespace?

    * Solaris
    * Oracle 9.2.0.4.0
    * Locally managed database (since SYSTEM is locally managed TS)
    I have a Oracle 9i database with is around 7 months old. Over the 7 months it had around 400 schema’s at most and SYSTEM tablespace was increased to 850MB. Now it only has around 120 schema’s and size of the SYSTEM tablespace still 850MB and it’s 99% used.
    How can I get more free space on system tablespace?
    * I have made sure that non-sys(tem) user don’t have objects on SYSTEM tablespace.
    * I understand that dropping schema does not give you all the space back, since objects are store as row in System tables etc.
    Increasing disk is not an option for me. Any tips to free space on system welcome.
    Thanks,
    Nazrul Islam

    Thanks Joel Pérez for trying to help.
    SQL> select segment_name, owner from
    dba_segments
    where owner not in
    ('SYS','SYSTEM','OUTLN','MDSYS','ORDSYS','WMSYS')
    and
    TABLESPACE_NAME='SYSTEM';
    SEGMENT_NAME                   OWNER
    TOAD_PLAN_SQL                  TOAD
    TOAD_PLAN_TABLE                TOAD
    PLSQL_PROFILER_RUNS            TOAD
    PLSQL_PROFILER_UNITS           TOAD
    PLSQL_PROFILER_DATA            TOAD
    TPSQL_IDX                      TOAD
    TPTBL_IDX                      TOAD
    SYS_C006895561                 TOAD
    SYS_C006895563                 TOAD
    SYS_C006895566                 TOAD
    10 rows selected.
    SQL> select owner from dba_segments where
    tablespace_name='SYSTEM'
    group by owner;
    OWNER
    OUTLN
    SYS
    SYSTEM
    TOAD
    WMSYSHere is my query (to show TOAD is taking very little
    space):r.- That is true, the space used by TOAD is little
    >
    SQL> select owner, SUM(bytes)/1048576 AS "TOTAL
    (MB)"
    from dba_segments
    where tablespace_name = 'SYSTEM'
    group by owner order by "TOTAL (MB)" desc;
    OWNER                 TOTAL (MB)
    SYS                     820.4375
    SYSTEM                      20.5
    WMSYS                     3.6875
    TOAD                       .6875
    OUTLN                       .375Looks like, I have to grow system. Or since I have a
    fixed number of schema now, I think I will have to
    recreate a DB to reduce SYSTEM size.
    Joel one other info that might explain why
    this happening. Part of our build process is to drop
    4 schemas and roles and recreate them.
    e.g.
    drop user nislam cascade;
    create user nislam ....And we do many builds a day. Maybe Oracle uses more
    space in doing that since new userid, better might be
    drop objects from the schema. WHAT do you
    say?
    r.- In theorical lines. Both must give the same results but... I would recommend you to carry out some intensive test about it in a test enviroment testing both methods to monitor the behavior of the growth of the tablespace system. As you said, perhaps dropping the user objects will get better results.
    >
    Regards,
    Nazrul IslamJoel Pérez
    http://otn.oracle.com/experts

  • Windows Server 2012 - Hyper-V - Cluster Sharded Storage - VHDX unexpectedly gets copied to System Volume Information by "System", Virtual Machines stops respondig

    We have a problem with one of our deployments of Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V with a 2 node cluster connected to a iSCSI SAN.
    Our setup:
    Hosts - Both run Windows Server 2012 Standard and are clustered.
    HP ProLiant G7, 24 GB RAM. This is the primary host and normaly all VMs run on this host.
    HP ProLiant G5, 20 GB RAM. This is the secondary host that and is intended to be used in case of failure of the primary host.
    We have no antivirus on the hosts and the scheduled ShadowCopy (previous version of files) is switched off.
    iSCSI SAN:
    QNAP NAS TS-869 Pro, 8 INTEL SSDSA2CW160G3 160 GB i a RAID 5 with a Host Spare. 2 Teamed NIC.
    Switch:
    DLINK DGS-1210-16 - Both the network cards of the Hosts that are dedicated to the Storage and the Storage itself are connected to the same switch and nothing else is connected to this switch.
    Virtual Machines:
    3 Windows Server 2012 Standard - 1 DC, 1 FileServer, 1 Application Server.
    1 Windows Server 2008 Standard Exchange Server.
    All VMs are using dynamic disks (as recommended by Microsoft).
    Updates
    We have applied the most resent updates to the Hosts, VMs and iSCSI SAN about 3 weeks ago with no change in our problem and we continually update the setup.
    Normal operation:
    Normally this setup works just fine and we see no real difference in speed in startup, file copy and processing speed in LoB applications of this setup compared to a single host with two 10000 RPM Disks. Normal network speed is 10-200 Mbit, but occasionally
    we see speeds up to 400 Mbit/s of combined read/write for instance during file repair.
    Our Problem:
    Our problem is that for some reason a random VHDX gets copied to System Volume Information by "System" of the Clusterd Shared Storage (i.e. C:\ClusterStorage\Volume1\System Volume Information).
    All VMs stops responding or responds very slowly during this copy process and you can for instance not send CTRL-ALT-DEL to a VM in the Hyper-V console, or for instance start task manager when already logged in.
    This happens at random and not every day and different VHDX files from different VMs gets copied each time. Some time it happens during daytime wich causes a lot of problems, especially when a 200 GB file gets copied (which take a lot of time).
    What it is not:
    We thought that this was connected to the backup, but the backup had finished 3 hours before the last time this happended and the backup never uses any of the files in System Volume Information so it is not the backup.
    An observation:
    When this happend today I switched on ShadowCopy (previous files) and set it to only to use 320 MB of storage and then the Copy Process stopped and the virtual Machines started responding again. This could be unrelated since there is no way to see
    how much of the VHDX that is left to be copied, so it might have been finished at the same time as I enabled  ShadowCopy (previos files).
    Our question:
    Why is a VHDX copied to System Volume Information when scheduled ShadowCopy (previous version of files) is switched off? As far as I know, nothing should be copied to this folder when this functionis switched off?
    List of VSS Writers:
    vssadmin 1.1 - Volume Shadow Copy Service administrative command-line tool
    (C) Copyright 2001-2012 Microsoft Corp.
    Writer name: 'Task Scheduler Writer'
       Writer Id: {d61d61c8-d73a-4eee-8cdd-f6f9786b7124}
       Writer Instance Id: {1bddd48e-5052-49db-9b07-b96f96727e6b}
       State: [1] Stable
       Last error: No error
    Writer name: 'VSS Metadata Store Writer'
       Writer Id: {75dfb225-e2e4-4d39-9ac9-ffaff65ddf06}
       Writer Instance Id: {088e7a7d-09a8-4cc6-a609-ad90e75ddc93}
       State: [1] Stable
       Last error: No error
    Writer name: 'Performance Counters Writer'
       Writer Id: {0bada1de-01a9-4625-8278-69e735f39dd2}
       Writer Instance Id: {f0086dda-9efc-47c5-8eb6-a944c3d09381}
       State: [1] Stable
       Last error: No error
    Writer name: 'System Writer'
       Writer Id: {e8132975-6f93-4464-a53e-1050253ae220}
       Writer Instance Id: {7848396d-00b1-47cd-8ba9-769b7ce402d2}
       State: [1] Stable
       Last error: No error
    Writer name: 'Microsoft Hyper-V VSS Writer'
       Writer Id: {66841cd4-6ded-4f4b-8f17-fd23f8ddc3de}
       Writer Instance Id: {8b6c534a-18dd-4fff-b14e-1d4aebd1db74}
       State: [5] Waiting for completion
       Last error: No error
    Writer name: 'Cluster Shared Volume VSS Writer'
       Writer Id: {1072ae1c-e5a7-4ea1-9e4a-6f7964656570}
       Writer Instance Id: {d46c6a69-8b4a-4307-afcf-ca3611c7f680}
       State: [1] Stable
       Last error: No error
    Writer name: 'ASR Writer'
       Writer Id: {be000cbe-11fe-4426-9c58-531aa6355fc4}
       Writer Instance Id: {fc530484-71db-48c3-af5f-ef398070373e}
       State: [1] Stable
       Last error: No error
    Writer name: 'WMI Writer'
       Writer Id: {a6ad56c2-b509-4e6c-bb19-49d8f43532f0}
       Writer Instance Id: {3792e26e-c0d0-4901-b799-2e8d9ffe2085}
       State: [1] Stable
       Last error: No error
    Writer name: 'Registry Writer'
       Writer Id: {afbab4a2-367d-4d15-a586-71dbb18f8485}
       Writer Instance Id: {6ea65f92-e3fd-4a23-9e5f-b23de43bc756}
       State: [1] Stable
       Last error: No error
    Writer name: 'BITS Writer'
       Writer Id: {4969d978-be47-48b0-b100-f328f07ac1e0}
       Writer Instance Id: {71dc7876-2089-472c-8fed-4b8862037528}
       State: [1] Stable
       Last error: No error
    Writer name: 'Shadow Copy Optimization Writer'
       Writer Id: {4dc3bdd4-ab48-4d07-adb0-3bee2926fd7f}
       Writer Instance Id: {cb0c7fd8-1f5c-41bb-b2cc-82fabbdc466e}
       State: [1] Stable
       Last error: No error
    Writer name: 'Cluster Database'
       Writer Id: {41e12264-35d8-479b-8e5c-9b23d1dad37e}
       Writer Instance Id: {23320f7e-f165-409d-8456-5d7d8fbaefed}
       State: [1] Stable
       Last error: No error
    Writer name: 'COM+ REGDB Writer'
       Writer Id: {542da469-d3e1-473c-9f4f-7847f01fc64f}
       Writer Instance Id: {f23d0208-e569-48b0-ad30-1addb1a044af}
       State: [1] Stable
       Last error: No error
    Please note:
    Please only answer our question and do not offer any general optimization tips that do not directly adress the issue! We want the problem to go away, not to finish a bit faster!

    Hallo Lawrence!
    Thankyou for youre reply, some comments to help you and others who read this thread:
    First of all, we use Windows Server 2012 and the VHDX as I wrote in the headline and in the text in my post. We have not had this problem in similar setups with Windows Server 2008 R2, so the problem seem to be introduced in Windows Server 2012.
    These posts that you refer to seem to be outdated and/or do not apply to our configuration:
    The post about Dynamic Disks:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee941151(v=WS.10).aspx is only a recommendation for Windows Server 2008 R2 and the VHD format. Dynamic VHDX is indeed recommended by Microsoft when using Windows Server 2012 (please look in the optimization guide
    for Windows Server 2012).
    Infact, if we use fixed VHDX then we would have a bigger problem since fixed VHDX are generaly larger then Dynamic Disks, i.e. more data would be copied and that would take longer time = the VMs would be unresponsive for a longer time.
    The post "What's the deal with the System Volume Information folder"
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2003/11/20/55764.aspx is for Windows XP / Windows Server 2003 and some things has changed since then. for instance In Windows Server 2012, Shadow Copies cannot be controlled by going to Control panel -> System.
    Instead you right-click on a Drive (i.e. a Volume, for instance the C drive/Volume) in Computer and then click "Configure Shadow Copies".
    Windows Server 2008 R2 Backup problem
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/windowsbackup/thread/0fc53adb-477d-425b-8c99-ad006e132336 - This post is about the Antivirus software trying to scan files used during backup that exists in the System Volume Information folder and we do not
    have any antivirus software installed on our hosts as I stated in my post.
    Comment that might help us:
    So according to “System Volume Information” definition, the operation you mentioned is Volume Shadow Copy. Check event viewer to find Volume Shadow Copy related event logs and post them.
    Why?
    Furhter investigation suggests that a volume shadow copy is somehow created even though the Schedule for Shadows Copies is turned off for all drives. This happens at random and we have not found any pattern. Yesterday this operation took almost all available
    disk space (over 200 GB), but all the disk space was released when I turned on scheduled Shadow Copies for the CSV.
    I therefore draw these conclusions:
    The CSV Volume has about 600 GB of disk space and since Volume Shadows Copy used 200 GB, or about 33% of the disk space, and the default limit is 10% then I conclude that for some reason the unscheduled Volume Shadow Copy did not have any limit (or ignored
    the limit).
    When I turned on the Schedule I also change the limit to the minimum amount which is 320 MB and this is probably what released the disk space. That is, the unscheduled Volume Shadow Copy operation was aborted and it adhered to the limit and deleted the
    Volume Shadow Copy it had taken.
    I have also set the limit for Volume Shadow Copies for all other volumes to 320 MB by using the "Configure Shadow Copies" Window that you open by right clicking on a drive (volume) in Computer and then selecting "Configure Shadow Copies...".
    It is important to note that setting a limit for Shadow Copy Storage, and disabaling the Schedule are two different things! It is possible to have unlimited storage for Shadow Copies when the Schedule is disabled, however I do not know if this was the case
    Before I enabled Shadow Copies on the CSV since I did not look for this.
    I now have defined a limit for Shadow Copy Storage to 320 MB on all drives and then no VHDX should be copied to System Volume Information since they are all larger than 320 MB.
    Does this sound about right or am I drawing the wrong conclusions?
    Limits for Shadow Copies:
    Below we list the limits for our two hosts:
    "Primary Host":
    C:\>vssadmin list shadowstorage
    vssadmin 1.1 - Volume Shadow Copy Service administrative command-line tool
    (C) Copyright 2001-2012 Microsoft Corp.
    Shadow Copy Storage association
       For volume: (\\?\Volume{e3ad7feb-178b-11e2-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\)\\?\Volume{e3ad7feb-178b-11e2-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\
       Shadow Copy Storage volume: (\\?\Volume{e3ad7feb-178b-11e2-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\)\\?\Volume{e3ad7feb-178b-11e2-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\
       Used Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
       Allocated Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
       Maximum Shadow Copy Storage space: 320 MB (91%)
    Shadow Copy Storage association
       For volume: (E:)\\?\Volume{dc0a177b-ab03-44c2-8ff6-499b29c3d5cc}\
       Shadow Copy Storage volume: (E:)\\?\Volume{dc0a177b-ab03-44c2-8ff6-499b29c3d5cc}\
       Used Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
       Allocated Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
       Maximum Shadow Copy Storage space: 320 MB (0%)
    Shadow Copy Storage association
       For volume: (G:)\\?\Volume{f58dc334-17be-11e2-93ee-9c8e991b7c20}\
       Shadow Copy Storage volume: (G:)\\?\Volume{f58dc334-17be-11e2-93ee-9c8e991b7c20}\
       Used Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
       Allocated Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
       Maximum Shadow Copy Storage space: 320 MB (3%)
    Shadow Copy Storage association
       For volume: (C:)\\?\Volume{e3ad7fec-178b-11e2-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\
       Shadow Copy Storage volume: (C:)\\?\Volume{e3ad7fec-178b-11e2-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\
       Used Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
       Allocated Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
       Maximum Shadow Copy Storage space: 320 MB (0%)
    C:\>cd \ClusterStorage\Volume1
    Secondary host:
    C:\>vssadmin list shadowstorage
    vssadmin 1.1 - Volume Shadow Copy Service administrative command-line tool
    (C) Copyright 2001-2012 Microsoft Corp.
    Shadow Copy Storage association
       For volume: (\\?\Volume{b2951138-f01e-11e1-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\)\\?\Volume{b2951138-f01e-11e1-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\
       Shadow Copy Storage volume: (\\?\Volume{b2951138-f01e-11e1-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\)\\?\Volume{b2951138-f01e-11e1-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\
       Used Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
       Allocated Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
       Maximum Shadow Copy Storage space: 35,0 MB (10%)
    Shadow Copy Storage association
       For volume: (D:)\\?\Volume{5228437e-9a01-4690-bc40-1df85a0e6736}\
       Shadow Copy Storage volume: (D:)\\?\Volume{5228437e-9a01-4690-bc40-1df85a0e6736}\
       Used Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
       Allocated Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
       Maximum Shadow Copy Storage space: 27,3 GB (10%)
    Shadow Copy Storage association
       For volume: (C:)\\?\Volume{b2951139-f01e-11e1-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\
       Shadow Copy Storage volume: (C:)\\?\Volume{b2951139-f01e-11e1-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\
       Used Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
       Allocated Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
       Maximum Shadow Copy Storage space: 6,80 GB (10%)
    C:\>
    There is something strange about the limits on the Secondary host!
    I have not in any way changed the settings on the Secondary host and as you can see, the Secondary host has a maximum limit of only 35 MB storage on the CSV, but it also shows that this is 10% of the Volume. This is clearly not the case since 10% if 600
    GB = 60 GB!
    The question is, why does it by default set a too small limit (i.e. < 320 MB) on the CSV and is this the cause of the problem? I.e. is the limit ignored since it is smaller than the smallest amount you can provide using the GUI?
    Is the default 35 MB maximum Shadow Copy limit a bug, or is there any logical reason for setting a limit that according to the GUI is too small?

  • System volume information using most disk resources?

    I have a Toshiba satellite p755-S5381 running windows 7 64 bit with a 750 GB HDD. For the last several months it occasionally gets slow even when few programs are running. When I check the resource manager the system process is reading and writing in the System Volume Information folder on both the main "C" drive and an extra partition "E" drive which contains a window 8 install. I have tried defragmenting and disk check but neither had any effect on the level of disk use. What could be causing this? It is really reducing the performance of the computer.

    Satellite P755-S5381
    the system process is reading and writing in the System Volume Information folder on both the main "C" drive and an extra partition "E" drive which contains a window 8 install.
    That's the shadow-copy function which provides both System Restore points and backup versions of individual files. You can turn it off entirely by disabling the Volume Shadow Copy service in Services (services.msc).
    And you can adjust it. Open System Properties (sysdm.cpl). On the System Protection tab, select a partition and click Configure. You'll probably want to turn it off for your E partition and make some adjustments for your C partition.
    -Jerry

  • Missing "System Volume Information" from a Drive

    Hi,
    I am trying to setup FSRM in Windows 2012 and while adding G:\ for file screen, I get the following error. Upon investigating the issue, I found that "System Volume Information" is missing under G:\ and same folder very much exists in C: and other
    drives except G:\. Therefore FSRM doesn't allow me to add G:\ for file screening.
    Event ID 8197
    File Server Resource Manager Service error: Unexpected error.
    Error-specific details:
       Error: RtlCreateSystemVolumeInformationFolder on volume C:?\Volume{bca40430-5752-11e3-93fe-001dd8b71cad} returned 0x5, 0x8000ffff, Catastrophic failure
    Any thoughts and how can I get that folder back so I can configure FSRM?
    thanks in advance.
    Merwin

    Hello,
    System volume information folder is a very important system folder for the file system to work properly, besides the issue you have with FSRM. 
    I would reccomend to backup up the entire drive as a precaution. Try to fix FS errors by executing "chkdsk g: /f" (you may temporarily turn system restore off). 
    In case nothing works, you have always the option to format the Drive and restore the FS structure.
    Lefteris Karafilis 
    MCSE, MCTS, SEC+ 
    LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/lkarafilis 
    Mail: [email protected] 
    Blog: http://www.karafilis.net 

  • Having issues with System Volume Information

    Hi All.
    I hjave a Ps script that I use to wipe off data from SQL servers as aprt of a decom process.
    The script is as follows.
    get-childitem F:\ -include *.ldf,*.mdf,*.ndf,*.bak,*.trc,*.txt,*error*,*sqlagent*,*system_heal*,*xel*,*bak*,*logs*,*.mdmp*,*cer* -exclude *System* -recurse | foreach ($_) {remove-item $_.fullname -Force }
    At the moment, it runs into issues with a folder. I would either like to delete the folder as well or actually exclude it. Also as an improcement to the script, I would want it to display the list of files it has deleted.
    The error that I get is as follows.
    remove-item : Access to the path 'F:\System Volume Information' is denied.
    At line:1 char:155
    + ...  foreach ($_) {remove-item $_.fullname -Force   }
    +                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        + CategoryInfo          : PermissionDenied: (F:\:String) [Remove-Item], UnauthorizedAccessException
        + FullyQualifiedErrorId : RemoveItemUnauthorizedAccessError,Microsoft.PowerShell.Commands.RemoveItemCommand
    Confirm
    The item at F:\ has children and the Recurse parameter was not specified. If you continue, all children
    will be removed with the item. Are you sure you want to continue?
    [Y] Yes  [A] Yes to All  [N] No  [L] No to All  [S] Suspend  [?] Help (default is "Y"):
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi MrFlinstone,
    I’m writing to just check in to see if the suggestions were helpful. If you need further help, please feel free to reply this post directly so we will be notified to follow it up.
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click here.
    Best Regards,
    Anna Wang
    TechNet Community Support

  • How to reduce the size of volume jumps

    I love my itouch gen 5 but the size of the volume jumps annoy me. They are too large.  On say 5 bars, the music is not loud enough, the next bar up, too loud.
    I have found a simple solution (which didn't show up on google).  Just go to settings, music, turn volume limit on, and set the slider to somewhere near the middle (as least this works for earpods).  Now the volume increments are working to a much lower total volume and you get finer increments.
    I thought this may only affect the standard music app but no, it seems system wide, including spotify.  
    Maybe I'm dumb not to figure this out earlier but anyway, thought I would share.

    Mara,
    you can reduce the size of the portlet customizing the HTML
    code... i had the same problem and i reproduced the search
    portlet with a dynamic page, customizing my HTML and using the
    categ. & perspective IDs of the original portlet. It works but
    is not an elegant way to do this... i'm searching a better way
    to do it. If you'll find, please let me know....
    Fab

  • How to reduce the size of cloned Oracle Applications Instance

    How to reduce the size of cloned Oracle applications instance, so as to save the storage space for the cloned systems.
    How can we remove unimplemented modules in the instance so that we can reclaim the space occupied by them.
    can any please suggest on this..?

    mumbai,
    I would recommend to leave it as it is.
    If you can add some inexpensive HDD to your test system then do so.
    The Apps DB storage decreasing process is quite painful and isn't straightforward.
    You can’t just delete unused schemas & tablesapces (if they are not used than they are not consuming reasonable space anyway). The modules in Apps are using each other procedures and objects. The effect of deleting one module (schema) is highly unpredictable.
    If you will do something like that than you will not be able to patch your cloned system after that.
    Some things can be done however in order to reduce size of a testing Apps system:
    - Decries UNDO & TEMP tablespaces. Normally you do not need that big tbs in test system as you have got in the production.
    - If your REDO LOG files are quite big and you have got a lot of redo groups you can recreated smaller REDO log files.
    - On Apps tier you can delete OUTput and LOG files
    In case you still would like to decrease data volume in your testing system you need to take a look on some tools which provide data subtracting capabilities from Apps DB. This process has to be quite intelligent. The tool have to know the data structures in APPS DB and subtract data in the way to not harm logical relationships between records. After a subtracting process you will need to make multiple FULL exp/imp cycles in order to reduce physical space consumed by the database. Beside the fact that those tools are quite expensive you will need to spend a lot of your time to implement those.
    BTW: That is the size of you production DB? Have you analyzed which module takes most of the space? May be you can identify top 10 objects and try to archive a data from those object preventing the future grow of the production database.
    Just my 0.02£
    Yury
    Check this out:
    A.
    http://www.freelists.org/archives/ora-apps-dba/05-2006/msg00000.html
    B.
    - Users can subscribe to your list by sending email to
    ora-apps-dba-request_at_freelists.org with 'subscribe' in the Subject field
    C.
    http://www.freelists.org/archives/ora-apps-dba/05-2006/threads.html

  • How can I reduce the size of the jvm?

    I would like to decrease the size of a jvm; I've found a program that makes it, but you don't know how does it works (and you have to pay for it), I'm talking about VM Optimizer 2.0, from Invirtus.
    Can anyone tell me how can I reduce the size of the jvm?
    Thanks a lot.

    I assume you mean the size of a JVM instance in memory and not the size of the JRE which is on the disk.
    I don't believe that there is any way at present for your Java code to change the amount of memory available to the JVM. This shouldn't matter too much, though. Firstly, you can control the size of the JVM from the command prompt with the -Xms and -Xmx options. Secondly, any remotely reasonable operating system is going to wait until the JVM has requested memory before allocating all of it. If you start a JVM with a 2Gb heap, it does not occupy 2Gb of physical memory straight away.
    Finally, I did a Google on InVirtus VM Optimizer and must request some information. What does that software have to do with Java? It's designed to reduce the size of a virtual computer as created by a prorgam such as VMWare. It has nothing to do with the Java virtual machine.

  • Deletion of  data to reduce the size of the SAP instance

    Hi ,
    Could you please provide me steps of deletion of PO's Req's, Material Masters and any other data that might be plant specific in SAP for a new instance for a site .We want to keep the config and key master data elements but not all the archiveable data in the system.
    My information is not relating to archive but delete the data to reduce the size of the SAP instance and any financial data.
    Many thanks in advance,
    Krish.

    resolved

  • Question on Blu ray image size output and reducing the size

    Hi
    I have been using encore for blu ray projects which is been proving very helpful. However recently i have had a issue with output size on files. Normally Encore gives me it's estimate that it will fill the disc nicely and provides a image/folder which is about 17-20GB (using 25GB disc) but now out of the blue it's files sizes it outputs has been 24.8GB which technically is less than 25GB but as anyone knows who burns to media, the disc doesn't actually have 25GB of space (something like 23,8 or something, i can't remember without checking). Anyway of course this is a issue because my output size is contantly now coming up to be about 600MB - 1GB over the disc actual size, i figured Encore normally compresses files to fit considering i have burned similar amounts/size media before and never had a issue.
    Anyway my issue is the slightly larger file size, i figured the easiest way to reduce the blu ray output size was to of course play with the transcode settings, which usually are set to the default settings for Blu ray (the quality preset is called something like "1280x720p 50 High Quality MPEG-2") so of course i thought to lower the bitrate a little just for a test, so i did just that and cut the default bit rate from 25[Mbs] to 20, i didn't want to lower it too much as it was a test to see what i could save for file size. Anyway so i re-transcoded the file and built another image, sadly the image size oddly enough came out as 26.something GB... so it actually grew in size by reducing the file bitrate which put me at a loss. I was wondering what common ways i could use to lower this file size just by a few hundred MB or up to 1GB in this case without having to remove content from the disc (it would be a waste to not only seperate the content but to use a whole disc for a leftover 600mb-1gb project). I of course want to keep quality as high as possible but i understand when trying to reduce size quality has to normally be hit in these situations so i can deal with a slight loss of quality. I have been browsing the forums here and though some topics seem similar they have the issue of file sizes coming out as 40GB+.
    Now im no genius with Encore, normally as said the file size is always between 17-20GB as i figure encore was using a "fit to disc" type feature but because the output size is technically below 25gb but not actually below enough to burn i was wondering 2 things:
    1) is it possible to make encore it's self shrink these files a little more, lowering the target size down by 1GB would do wonders but only option i have seen is to have a 25GB disc or DL disc with no option to customize the output size (forcefully lowering it by 1GB).
    2) because i imagine the above can't be done i was wondering how to go about reducing the size by around 1GB or so, i don't need like 10GB freeing up so it's only a small amount, as said this is a issue i have had with the last few projects i made and the size varies from needing 600MB - 1GB (it doesn't usually exceed needing 1GB free space... besides when i lowered the bit rate which increased size a lot). In the past i always just cut the bitrate of files down a little (never by lots but enough to free space up) but clearly that failed my test so im at a loss of how to reduce file size without a huge loss in quality.
    For the record i have already produced the file as both a image file and a folder and both have the same issue.
    Extra info on the project:
    It contains 4 Menu's, 13 video files which vary in lengh from short ones at about 5mintues to longer ones which the largest is about 20minutes. I commonly burn this number of video files/space with fine quality and no issue so i would rather not take files from the project.
    quality preset details are defaultly as said above set to "1280x720p 50 High quality MPEG-2" settings, i am not on my computer with encore at the moment so i can't post full specifics right now but if you have encore handy you should be able to check.
    Tried reducing bit rate but that increased overall size, the actual plan was to hopefully lower the bit rate to around 21 [mbs] (from 25) and then do that for multiple (or all) files until it fitted but after it increased the size i lost hope there, it said the estimated file size (on the individual video) would drop by around 300-400mb  but that didn't work.
    I have tried both folder and iso which always come out the same size.
    Basically my main question/problem is any suggestion to drop the file size by up to 1GB without taking items out the project or a real high loss in quality (i don't mind small loss though as i can apply whatever solution to all files which should help).
    Any suggestions what i can try? as you probably gather im not a genius when it comes to this stuff but i tried including what i thought is relevent.

    Hi and thank you for the reply;
    one problem i seem to be having when reducing the bitrate is the file size is oddly increasing from 24.8GB to 26.4GB, i can't really figure this one out as well it's having the oppisite effect. I checked the "streams" folder on output and decided to compare automatic transcoding to manual lowered bitrate and im not too sure where the increased file size is going, i found which video file it was causing the issue, all videos files range or average around 1.6GB each but one file was taking 4.5GB, after lowering that files bitrate it cut it down to 2GB which was of course saving me 2GB from the old file but the overall size had increased which was odd. Seems the other files are all the same so it hasn't tried improving them (so it seems) so i can't make ends of why the size is increasing.
    I will try playing with the source file to see if i can do anything that way, if not i will try transcoding in premiere (i have had troubles with this before so i try to avoid it).
    Oh and yes i was using Automatic.
    Anyway i will see if editing the file outside might help first and see how that works. Thanks again for the reply.

Maybe you are looking for

  • DPS App opening a PDF in a Separate App

    From a DPS generated App, I would like to open a separate PDF file using an App that will give me the tools to work with a PDF file, such as Highlight/Underline and Bookmark. How can I setup the File Link that will allow me to open or download the PD

  • File GPP preference item fails path not found

    Hi, I have a GPP preference item, for a file, to copy it from a file share to C:\ on my servers. The computer 'SetACL.exe' preference item in the 'Base Tools {0CC263CF-2996-40A5-8690-9C8E7A2314C5}' Group Policy Object did not apply because it failed

  • Job scheduling in ALE

    Hai,   My Requirement is like if i create a PO in one server it has to be convert as SO in another server.its working in properly  both the servers.i want to know how to do job scheduling(The interface needs to run once a day at particular time).Give

  • What's the best setting for a best shades quality?

    Hi! I would like to know what are the best codec and the best setting for a video with 1920x1080 of resolution. I've tried them all but nothing because the shades...are not shades. I want a video that is like a uncompressed video but lighter. Same qu

  • Issue with WRT350N

    I setup offline files on my laptop, I edited the files and got an access denied error when trying to synchronize. The only issue with that is, I setup this user to have R/W Access. Any ideas?