FSCM- Dispute cases were not closed automatically for credit disputed amounts

Dear All,
We are creating the dispute cases for overpayment or un-applied cash payments (that is credit document) through FDM_AUTO_CREATE. But those credit dispute cases were not closed automatically after I cleared the documents through F-26 or F-32.
We are running FDM_PROCESS_BUFFER program through batch job for every hour. And we made correct configuration for automatic dispute case close in SPRO. Also the debit disputes were closed automatically.
Especially we are facing this issue for credit special g/l transaction (partial/residual/charge of difference clearing) documents.
Note : I can see two changes automatically in credit dispute cases these are, 1) Disputed amount get zero 2) Disputed objects (that is credit document) is automatically removed (Attributes => Linked Objects => Disputed Objects) in the credit dispute cases
Can you please help me how to resolve this issue.
Thank you in advance.
Thanks & Regards,
KVP

Dear Experts,
Can I have solution for this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
KVP

Similar Messages

Customer Disputes not closing automatically

Hi,
I am currently checking an issue why my customer disputed items are not closing automatically after the invoices have been paid.
- The regular financial disputes close automatically
- The casy type and the correct status profile
- the status profile is set to close directly from new status to to be collected / then closed
- The status profile has changed after initial set up
- I ran the process bufffer program and no result, the disputes are still open.
- We have activate the customer disputed objects properly as far as i can see.
Thanks for the assist
regards',
Richard

I concur with the mesgs above that for customer disputed cases, it gives additional time for AR analysts to investigate the claims. And if it actually turns out to be a dispute, then eventually it will result in creation of AR residual and in turn a Dispute case.
In scenario mentioned of multiple disputes for the same invoice, you need not have multiple dispute cases open, unless its a specific business requirement. You anyways have the disputed amount and current disputed amount filled correctly and make appropriate use of reason code and root cause code to depict this scenario in just one dispute case itself.
However if you still want to create more than one dispute case for the same AR item, in that case, please either use the splitting functionality to accurately depict the disputes in AR as well as FSCM.

Dispute case does not get updated with subsequent partial payment

Hi Experts
I am now still testing the Dispute management .. but it's my first time to see that some times created dispute case does not get updated with the payment posted against the invoice which the dispute case has been raised .. when i trying to add open item to the current dispute case i face this Error..
Process step 004: Change not possible, process step 003 missing
Message no. UDM_MSG037
Diagnosis
The dispute case is to be changed by process step 004 from accounting. However, there is at least one process (for example, clearing transaction from payment or credit memo) that was performed before the current step and that has not yet updated the dispute case. The changes to the dispute case must be carried out in the correct order.
System Response
The dispute case could not be changed.
Procedure
In an asynchronous change to dispute cases using IDoc, make sure that all IDocs of the previous process have been posted. Then you can carry out the required action (for example, post the current IDoc from process step 004 or include further items). The immediate previous process step is 003.
Your kind feed back is highly appreciated..
Regards
Mahmoud EL Nady

Hi
Thanks for straight forward solutions its now working properly after run the program.. thanks too much..
also do i need to run this program periodically or once i notice that one dispute case it not getting updated?
Regards
Mahmoud El Nady

My iPhones email app is not checking automatically for emails, only when I open it.. How to fix?

My iPhones email app is not checking automatically for emails, only when I open it.. How to fix?

Settings > Mail, Contacts, Calendars > Fetch New Data > On
then scroll down to bottom of that page to check whether you want to fetch email:
every 15 minutes
every 30 minutes
hourly
manually

Getting error like "The following tags were not closed ..."

Hi,
I am getting an error like "The following tags were not closed <Main Report Name>. Error processing resource 'http://abc.cdf.bnm/OA_CGI/FNDWRR.e..."
Issue is , TAG is breaking with main report name.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Edited by: user12086550 on May 10, 2010 5:33 AM

I'm having the same problem, but how did you resolved it??
my sub query is running good in toad. this is my xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dataTemplate name="Asset_Loc_Change" description="Change_in_Asset_Location_and_Account" version="1.0">
     <properties>
          <property name="xml_tag_class" value="upper"/>
          <property name="include_parameters" value="true"/>
     </properties>
     <parameters>
          <parameter name="P_START_DATE" dataType="varchar2"></parameter>
          <parameter name="P_END_DATE" dataType="varchar2"></parameter>
          <parameter name="P_BOOK_NAME" dataType="varchar2"></parameter>
     </parameters>
     <lexicals>
     </lexicals>
     <dataQuery>
          <sqlStatement name="LOC_DETAIL">
               <![CDATA[
select
ASSET_NUMBER,DESCRIPTION,ASSET_CATEGORY,trunc(MAX(DATE_CHANGED)) DATE_CHANGED,
MAX(OLD_ACCOUNT) OLD_ACCOUNT,Max(NEW_ACCOUNT) NEW_ACCOUNT,Max(OLD_LOCATION) OLD_LOCATION,Max(NEW_LOCATION) NEW_LOCATION
from(
select distinct
fad.asset_number,
fad.ATTRIBUTE_CATEGORY_CODE ASSET_CATEGORY,
fad.description DESCRIPTION,
max(fdh.DATE_EFFECTIVE) DATE_CHANGED,
NVL2(to_char(fdh.TRANSACTION_HEADER_ID_OUT), NULL, gcc.segment1||'.'||gcc.segment2||'.'||gcc.segment3||'.'||gcc.segment4||'.'||gcc.segment5||'.'||gcc.segment6||'.'||gcc.segment7||'.'||gcc.segment8) OLD_ACCOUNT,
NVL2(to_char(fdh.TRANSACTION_HEADER_ID_OUT), gcc.segment1||'.'||gcc.segment2||'.'||gcc.segment3||'.'||gcc.segment4||'.'||gcc.segment5||'.'||gcc.segment6||'.'||gcc.segment7||'.'||gcc.segment8, NULL) NEW_ACCOUNT,
NVL2(to_char(fdh.TRANSACTION_HEADER_ID_OUT), NULL, fal.segment4||'-'||fal.segment3||'-'||fal.segment2||','||fal.segment1) OLD_LOCATION,
NVL2(to_char(fdh.TRANSACTION_HEADER_ID_OUT), fal.segment4||'-'||fal.segment3||'-'||fal.segment2||','||fal.segment1, NULL) NEW_LOCATION
from
fa_distribution_history fdh,
fa_locations fal,
FA_CATEGORIES CAT,
fa_additions fad,
gl_code_combinations gcc,
fa_books fb
where
1=1
and fdh.DATE_EFFECTIVE between to_char(trunc(:P_START_DATE)) and to_char(trunc(:P_END_DATE))
and fal.location_id = fdh.location_id
and fad.asset_id = fdh.asset_id
and fdh.code_combination_id = gcc.code_combination_id
and fb.book_type_code = fdh.book_type_code
and fb.book_type_code = to_char(:P_BOOK_NAME)
and fb.asset_id = fdh.asset_id
Group by
fad.asset_number,
fad.ATTRIBUTE_CATEGORY_CODE,
fad.description
,NVL2(to_char(fdh.TRANSACTION_HEADER_ID_OUT), NULL, gcc.segment1||'.'||gcc.segment2||'.'||gcc.segment3||'.'||gcc.segment4||'.'||gcc.segment5||'.'||gcc.segment6||'.'||gcc.segment7||'.'||gcc.segment8),
NVL2(to_char(fdh.TRANSACTION_HEADER_ID_OUT), gcc.segment1||'.'||gcc.segment2||'.'||gcc.segment3||'.'||gcc.segment4||'.'||gcc.segment5||'.'||gcc.segment6||'.'||gcc.segment7||'.'||gcc.segment8, NULL),
NVL2(to_char(fdh.TRANSACTION_HEADER_ID_OUT), NULL, fal.segment4||'-'||fal.segment3||'-'||fal.segment2||','||fal.segment1),
NVL2(to_char(fdh.TRANSACTION_HEADER_ID_OUT), fal.segment4||'-'||fal.segment3||'-'||fal.segment2||','||fal.segment1, NULL)
GROUP BY
ASSET_NUMBER,ASSET_CATEGORY,DESCRIPTION;
]]>
          </sqlStatement>
     </dataQuery>
     <dataStructure>
          <group name="G_ASSET_LOC" source="LOC_DETAIL">
               <element name="ASSET_NUMBER" value="ASSET_NUMBER"/>
               <element name="DESCRIPTION" value="DESCRIPTION"/>
               <element name="ASSET_CATEGORY" value="ASSET_CATEGORY"/>
               <element name="DATE_CHANGED" value="DATE_CHANGED"/>
               <element name="OLD_ACCOUNT" value="OLD_ACCOUNT"/>
               <element name="NEW_ACCOUNT" value="NEW_ACCOUNT"/>
               <element name="OLD_LOCATION" value="OLD_LOCATION"/>
               <element name="NEW_LOCATION" value="NEW_LOCATION"/>
          </group>
     </dataStructure>
</dataTemplate>

FSCM-DM: Status of Dispute Case does not change

Hi,
I'm facing a problem where i have a few dispute cases created in my worklist and, some of the invoices that are associated with the dispute case, are already paid.
The dispute case already disapear from "Dispute Case" tab but, when i check it again in the "Contact details" tab i notice that the status is still "In Process".
I customized my system like this:
On status Management,
SPRO=>Financial Supply Chain Management=>Dispute Management=>Dispute Case Processing=>Status Management=>Create Status Profile
Status   Status Discription SystemStatus System status discription
20            In Proces                                 002     In Process
30           Confirmed                                008     Confirmed
40           Closed                                     007     Closed
50           Canceled                                 009     Voided/Deleted/Canceled
And, in Process Integration
SPRO=>Financial Supply Chain Management=>Dispute Management=>Dispute Case Processing=>Process Integration=>Define Automatic Status Changes
Automatic reopen => 20
Automatic Written of =>40
Automatic closed => 40
Also, if i run the automatic written of program, no dispute case is considered.
Test:
I have a test where i created an dispute case and aftwards i paid the invoice.
Result:
The system generated an express mail requesting me to make a subsequent posting so i checked the SBWP transaction and i notice that there was an error and the system indicates to run the program FDM_PROCESS_BUFFER.
So, i run program FDM_PROCESS_BUFFER but i received the message that "Dispute Case 000000000222: Automatic close status 40 is not valid"
Thanks in advance for your inputs,
Edited by: Morbius on Oct 14, 2010 9:11 PM
Edited by: Morbius on Oct 14, 2010 9:56 PM
Edited by: Morbius on Oct 14, 2010 10:41 PM

Solved after updating the status data in customizing (the high and low values).

PR not closing automatically

Suppose I have a PR which have 10 qty, whole qty is converted to PO using ME57.
Still PR is not getting closed automatically.
Means closed indicator in PR is not getting updated.
System is not allowing to create new PO against this PR because we have an error message for this.
How the closed indicator will be updated automatically?
Please advise.
Thanks,

the closed indicator is only set if you flag the field in ME59N for this purpose, or if you do it manually while coverting the PR to a PO.
In any other case the field in the requisition remains unset, as SAP looks directly into field of open PR quantity.
However, SAP has a report to set the closed indicator
for this see OSS Note 206870 - Set Ordered purchase requisitions to completed

Purchase Requsition is not closing automatically During ME59 PO creation

Hi,
We are using PO creation through ME59,
In ME59 we have set the indicator 1 Set reqs. to "closed"
In PR we have 1 qty and in PO was created for 1 qty. But the PR was not closed.
When we check the F1 help for the filed it say it will work with respect to the rounding value. as for my concer the PR qty 1 was fulfilled by po with 1 qty creation. I dont know why the PR was not set to Closed automatically.
If we try 2 Set reqs. to "closed" It is working
Can any once explaing why it is not wroking for indicator 1
Regards
Palani

Is your order unit and requisition unit same ?

Output message not coming automatically for PO

hi
i cerated new output message sending PO to vendor by e-mail. I maintained condition records in MN04. Condition table, access sequence all are maintained. I included new output type into the control data of the existing schema RMBEF1 and the schema is assigned to PO also. Also maintain entry in following string SPRO- Material Management-Purchasing-Messages-Output control-Message Types-Define Message type for PO---Fine-Tuned Control: Purchase Order
Still the output message is not coming automatically while creating PO every time i add output type namually. please guide
regards

Hope you have maintained condition for combination. preferrably -
1) Purch Doc type > PORG > Vendor
2) Please make sure that, you have maintained the fileds which are relavant for output.(if you are making any changes in existing PO and you need output)
Hope this will help you

Output type not trigerring Automatically for inbound delivery

Hi all
We have created a custom output type for Delivery idoc processing ZPOD copy of OPOD and maintained all the settings also condition record for the same has been maintained.
But when we are creating inbound delivery the output type ZPOD is not coming automatically.
In the Delivery document and in the Output screen i have checked Determine analysis for output(VL32N -> Enter IBD No -> Select menu option Extras -> Delivery output -> Header
Go to menu option GoTo -> Determin.Analysis.)
It is showing me ->Message 502-Output ignored (requirement 017 not fulfilled)
Can u please throw some light so that in output message determination the Output type should come automatically for Proof of delivery
Thanks and regards
shailesh

Um... I think the message is pretty clear on this - the reason is "requirement 017 not fulfilled".
Requirements for output control may be found in VOFM transaction, under Requirements -> Output control. 017 is the standard one, the description says 'POD on goods issue'. According to the comments, the output is not issued if "POD status is initial" or "No output, if no goods receipt".
Either correct the document or remove this requirement in output configuration, if it's not applicable.

Collections Worklist: Total dispute amt is not a sumation of the disputes

Hi All,
I have a weird problem in my collections worklist at the moment where, when the list is generated, on the outer screen before your drill into the Business Partner, the value for "Disputed Amount" does not match the sum of the open disputes for that BP.
I have tried de-activating all of the BAdI implementations we had in place for various minor changes but it has had no affect. When I debug in the BAdI "UDM_WL_ITEM_CREATE_C" - "Enhancement of worklist items on creation" the BP is coming in with a reduced list of dispute cases or in some cases none at all.
From about 3 months ago it seems that our disputes are not being picked up to be added to the overall amount.
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Brenton.

You realise this is not Apple?
It is a community forum, of Apple users like yourself.
It does sound like you are dealing with someone else anyway, such as your phone company. Dispute the charge with your Credit company, which shouldn't be a problem since it is fairly obviously a double charge.
And yes stand up for what is right, whoever it is is just a typical bureaucracy and straightening them out takes persistence.
Peter

Accounting doucment not get created for Credit Memo

Hi
When creating a cancellation doucment(vf11) for credit memo accounting document not get created.While I go for analysis then it is determining the G/L account.But not getting created the accounting doucment.
When i select "Release to accounting" then it is giving a message like this:
"Automatic clearing of billing document 951
and canc. doc. 90000572 not poss." as informatiion first
and then later it is throwing an error message that "maintain correct number range"
While for the same material or earlier cancellation happened and accounting doucment get created.
Please help me out;How would i get this solved?
Thanks in advance

Hi,
You may also check for Number Range - Maintainance & Assignment.
T. Code: SNRO
Table/ View: RV_BELEG
Here, Mantain Number Range.
To Assign,
T. Code: SM30
T.Code: Bill_Num (or select if different in your case)
Assign No. range to your combination of Sales OrgDist.ChannelBill Type i.e. for Cancelled Billing Doc. Type
To Maintain Number Range for Accounting Documents,
T. Code: FBN1
Best Regards,
Amit

FB02 - Field KIDNO not on screen for credit doc (customer) / debit (vendor)

Hello,
I am trying to manually change field BDEG-KIDNO on transaction FB02.
I used custumization to make this field changeble when:
. Line item not cleared
. No invoice-related credit memo
I do not have the "Customer Debit or Vendor Credit" checked since I intended to change both debit and credit documents for customers and vendors.
When I used transaction FB02 to change this field I have no problems with debit documents on customers and credit documents on vendors but I cannot change it since the field BSEG-KIDNO does not appear on screen.
Is there any customization for whether field BSEG-KIDNO appears on screen for credit documents for customers and debit documents for vendors?
Any help will be appreciated.
Thank you
Elisabete

Hello,
The field I want to change is BSEG_KIDNO not BKPF-XBLNR.
This field (payment reference) appears on the line item if customer debit document and vendor credit document but not if customer credit document and vendor debit document.
Thanks,
Elisabete

G/L account not picking automatically for cost centre

Hai
When ever i create a P.O for a cost centre ,when i enter the cost centre, the system is not picking the G/L account automatically. Instead i need to enter the G/L account manually.Why it is behaing like this? what is the solution?
I had checked all the setting as mentioned below
1.OBYC-> Here maintained the G/L account for the comibination of
Valuation mod - Gereral Modi- Valuation class- debit g/l account - credit g/l account
2.OKB9 -> Maintained entries for Co.code- Cost element - Cost center
3.OME9- Account Modification is VBR
4.OBY6- Checked the field status variant, posting period variant

Hi,
Once u have given account assignment category 'K', then system will pick automatically G/L account from the OBYC settings for the combination of Valuation modification code, account modifier (VBR) & Valuation class.
From the OME9 transcation, system will pick transcation key for the respective account assignment category.
For the account assignment category 'K', account modifier is 'VBR'.
Here masterial master record (MMR) is optional. If you are giving MMR in the PO, system will pick valuation class from the MMR.
If MMR is not giving, then system will pick valuation class from the transcation OMQW. Here you need to maintain valuation class aganist material group, which is u r giving in the PO. ( This is optional)
In the OBYC transcation, for the transcation key GBB you need to maintain G/L account for the combination Valuation modification code, account modifier (VBR) & Valuation class.
Also maintain one more entry in the transcation key GBB, maintain G/L account for the combination Valuation modification code, account modifier (VBR) & Valuation class field is blank.
Once you have given account assignment category 'K' in the PO, system will pick G/L for the combination Valuation modification code, account modifier (VBR) & Valuation class. This is happening before giving the cost centre.
If you are not maintaining MMR in the PO and not maintaining valuation class aganist material group in the transcation OMQW, the system will pick G/L account for the combination of Valuation modification code, account modifier (VBR) & Valuation class field is blank.
So in your case, check valuation class aganist material group in the transcation OMQW and maintain G/L in the OBYC for the respective combination. If valuation class is not maintained aganist material group in the transcation OMQW and maintain one more entry in the OBYC with the blank valuation calss field.
Regards
KRK

SPD Workflow will not start automatically for the first entry in a list on any given day (subsequent entries start just fine)

Hi. I have various workflows on various lists that share a common issue. The first entry of the day on that list will not start the workflow automatically. We have SharePoint 2013 Foundation. This same issue occurred when we had SharePoint 2010
as well. Interestingly, I had read about a 'fix' by adding a 5 minute pause at the start of every workflow which worked fine for a while. Now I happened to find that this is no longer working (after I see a bunch of workflows that didn't fire over the past
month - ugh!).
I know I'm not the only one with this issue as I ran across others with the issue when I first researched it and found the 'pause fix' a year or so ago and I also talked with someone else during a SP seminar who used this same fix. NOTE: These
are end users creating the items. It is not logged as a system account.
Any help would be appreciated. I have a SharePoint developer I can hire if this is beyond my ability to fix. I just need some guidance (last time I inquired they weren't aware of this issue).

Can you also advise if these are complicated workflows or high traffic lists?
Steven Andrews
SharePoint Business Analyst: LiveNation Entertainment
Blog: baron72.wordpress.com
Twitter: Follow @backpackerd00d
My Wiki Articles:
CodePlex Corner Series
Please remember to mark your question as "answered" if this solves (or helps) your problem.

FSCM- Dispute cases were not closed automatically for credit disputed amounts

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for