FTP performance over NFS 3

Hi Guys,
I have a NFS mount from one solaris OS to another solaris OS, When i do FTP to the NFS mounted server i get disconnected during "cd" to one particular directory. There are 500000+ files in that directory of total size 50GB.
My NFS stat is as below. I will like to know if there is any way to cache the file count information on nfs client side or any way to improve the performance to resolve FTP issue.
---cut---
Flags: vers=3,proto=tcp,sec=sys,hard,intr,link,symlink,acl,rsize=1048576,wsize=32768,retrans=5,timeo=600
Attr cache: acregmin=3,acregmax=60,acdirmin=30,acdirmax=60
---cut---
Thanks
Rahul

Hi;
Please check below links which could heplful for your issue:
Using NFS with ASM…
http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2010/05/04/using-nfs-with-asm/
Oracle NetApp white paper..
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/asm/pdf/netapp_asm3329.pdf
http://kevinclosson.wordpress.com/kevin-closson-index/cfs-nfs-asm-topics/
Regard
Helios

Similar Messages

Sharing DVD over NFS - performance question

Hi,
I'm trying to share the DVD over NFS.
I have updated /etc/rmmount.conf with the following line:
share cdrom* -o ro,anon=0Everything works well, except the reading speed, which is quite slow.
Copying a ~200MB file from DVD over NFS takes ~12 minutes.
Copying the same file from DVD to the local filesystem takes ~2 minutes,
and copying this file from the hard drive over NFS takes ~20 seconds.
This makes me believe that the issue is in the interworking of the NFS and DVD-ROM, for (hypothetical) example,
the disk can not spin up to the max speed due to the random access.
Has anyone tried sharing the DVDs with good performance? Should I read up and tweak some NFS parameters or abandon the idea of achieving good performance?
I'm using Solaris 10 Update 7.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions.

Thanks for the suggestion.
I'm not sure if it's applicable for my issue. From what I've read, it may help if the same data is read over and over,
but not with the reading speed of just inserted DVD disks which are not yet cached (which is the usage pattern I'm trying to optimize for).

Ierrs on 3C905B over NFS on solaris 8 x86

I have 2 identical Dell PC's, one with Solaris 8 HW 07/01 and one with Solaris 2.6
On the Solaris 8 box, when copying files to local disk over NFS, I get lots of ierrs
on the elxl0 devices and the copy is very slow (NFS server is a netapp with gigabit). FTP
shows no increase in ierrs. The 2.6 box is fine doing the same operation
so I suspect Solaris 8. I've tried my install disks on a Dell pc with a 3C905C card
and thats OK. Here is netstat -ain
Name Mtu Net/Dest Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Collis Queue
lo0 8232 127.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 103 0 103 0 0 0
lo0 8232 127.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 0 N/A 101 N/A N/A 0
elxl0 1500 172.17.8.0 172.17.8.121 22768 4457 1995 0 0 0
elxl0 1500 172.17.8.0 172.17.8.121 20542 N/A 1992 N/A N/A 0
bash-2.03# netstat -k elxl0
elxl0:
opackets 2557 ipackets 30038 oerrors 0 ierrors 6016 collisions 0
obytes 456750 rbytes 38685177 multixmt 0 multircv 79 brdcstxmt 10 brdcstrcv 3108
unknowns 1908 blocked 0 ex_collisions 0 defer_xmts 77 align_errors 0
fcs_errors 0 oflo 6012 uflo 0 runt_errors 0 missed 0 tx_late_collisions 0
carrier_errors 1 noxmtbuf 0 norcvbuf 0 xmt_badinterp 0 rcv_badinterp 0
intr 24005 xmtretry 0 opackets64 2557 ipackets64 30038 obytes64 456750
rbytes64 38685177 ifspeed 100000000 duplex half media PHY/MII promisc off first_collisions 0
multi_collisions 0 sqe_errors 0 macxmt_errors 0 toolong_errors 0
Help!

Hi Ithieme,
Try with other media. This issue may be your media problem.
Revert back.
Thanks & Regards,
Senthilkumar
SUN - DTS

ASM over NFS or not?

Hello,
simple question: ASM over NFS (in particular NFSv3 on NetApp FS250) is faster than normal datafile on NFS or not?
Which is your experience?
Thanks
Stefano

Hi Stefano,
I have not seen such a configuration in production till now, but NetApp has a document about the different configurations and their performance:
http://www.netapp.com/library/tr/3423.pdf
Hope this helps you.
Best regards,
Matthias

Incorrect file sizes shown in Finder over NFS and permissions issues

Hi there
This is a problem that existed for me in Leopard and has not been resolved in Snow Leopard.
I have an XSan with a Leopard server sharing over NFS and AFP. When I connect from a Leopard or Snow Leopard client over NFS the file sizes in Finder are incorrectly displayed. My Tiger clients work perfectly.
Also, although it says I have read write access to the files over NFS I cannot save over an existing file when I make changes to it, I instead have to create a new version of it and remove the old one.
Check the link to show a grab of one of the folders in question, the upper window is what the NFS shows me, the lower AFP. If you Get Info on the files over either connection the byte count is identical.
http://www.the-9000.com/images/finder_anomaly.tiff
Any info would be greatly appreciated.

This is a problem that existed for me in Leopard and has not been resolved in Snow Leopard.
Have you filed a bug report with Apple?
http://developer.apple.com/bugreporter/
If not, there's less of a chance they'll know about it and help fix it for you.
Do things look OK from the command line in Terminal?
It would probably be useful to use a tool like Wireshark to check out what each protocol is sending over the wire. That could at least narrow it down to being a client or server issue.
Thanks
--macko

FTP vs. NFS- basic configuration and doubts - bt. unix and windows systems

Hi all,
I need to configure a connection between PI (unix box) and a windows server using File Adapter (both sender and receiver).
My doubts are:
- Which is preferable type of conection: NFS or FTP?
- Which are the advantages and disadvanteges of both?
- Most important: Which are the prerrequisites for both ways? Such as installing server ftp, or mounting folders, OS configuration, security config. Etc. etc.
I will apprettiate if you could also post a direct link to documentation.
Thanks in advance.
Exe.
Edited by: EZEG80 on Nov 9, 2010 1:18 AM

Hi,
NFS: when the file folder is available on the XI Server
FTP: when it is at remote
If the Sharing folder is in the same XI system then NFS..If the sharing folder is in different system it is FTP.
we will use NFS when we required to poll the files from local machines.and we will use FTP when we required to poll the data from the FTP server which are in the remote side or outside of the firewall
FTP (file transfer protocol) here you are getting data from ftp server or you are writing to FTP server.
NFS is used when your XI can access the file location directly using the NFS protocol.
When the File System can be access using FTP protocol, then you need to use FTP and provide the FTP server details and user crendentials to pull data from the File Server.
NFS is used when you want XI to use the NFS protocol to access thye location of the file.
FTP is File Transfer Protocol and is used when your Sender SYstem is using an FTP system to send / receiver files.
we are using NFS when we required to poll the files from local machines..
We are using FTP when we required to poll the data from the FTP server which are in the remote side or outside of the firewall..
For more info....go thru these threads...
FTP and NFS?????
differnce between nfs and ftp
FTP Vs NFS
Regds,
Pinangshuk.

NFS performance over ASM?

In Netapp storage 11gr2 rac on linux using ASM on NFS versus 11gr2 rac on linux using nfs with out ASM. Please advise, which one is better interms of performance for DW. DB going to be around 20TB. Appreciate your reply..

Hi;
Please check below links which could heplful for your issue:
Using NFS with ASM…
http://www.oracle-base.com/blog/2010/05/04/using-nfs-with-asm/
Oracle NetApp white paper..
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/asm/pdf/netapp_asm3329.pdf
http://kevinclosson.wordpress.com/kevin-closson-index/cfs-nfs-asm-topics/
Regard
Helios

IDOC to FTPs performance issue

Hello everyone,
I have a scenario BS_A:idoc > xi > BS_B: file via ftps (ftp over ssl/tcp).
For each idoc two different files (content conversion) are created in the same directory.
I therefore have one receiver determination and one interface intermination with 2 inbound interfaces + interface mappings + 2 file receiver adpapters.
I have a performance problem when more than one idocs are created at the same time. First message goes through very fast. The ones after that take there time.
It takes 10 to 30 minutes (and some times more) for 2 idocs to deliver successfully 4 files at the other side.
Note 1: I do not exprience this when i work with normal FTP.
Note 2: I have unchecked the "Maintain at order time" check box in the interface determination. If checked then the QoS is set to EOIO.
Thanks in advance for any input or suggestions.
Dimitris Hagigeorgiou

Hi ,
see the below links
FTP Problem
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/e3/94007075cae04f930cc4c034e411e1/frameset.htm
FTP Error
File Adapter FTP Timeout
FTP error Socket connection timed out:
Check if FTP is reachable? (like CMD > FTP > open?)
Secure FTP using FTPS (SSL/TLS) - need help!
Customize "Connection Timed Out" - Error Page
Regards
Chilla

FTP Mirrors and nfs module

My activity in the last few days concerning my Arch activity has given rise to some questions I hope you guys/gals don't mind to post them in one just one thread. Hopefully this is too the right place to ask them.
1) While performing some searches throughout the forums trying to find information in order to fix a nowadays struggle with Firefox I have seen quite a number of recommendations that addressed the OP to avoid ftp mirrors (fixing apparently library issues, changing mirrors). In my case since my early Debian days have always seen the ftp mirror, the pair to the http one that is, as a fallback mirror when the latter failed at some point, and viceversa. Therefore I usually have always commented out both the http and the ftp one. Did I do wrong all this time, even now in Arch?
If someone could enlighten me with regard to this 'avoid ftp mirros' recommendation I would appreciate it.
2) After one of the latest updates when processing the User modules I get the following message "Inserted module 'nfs' ". Since there was no notification during the update/upgrade process, even checked the pacman.log, am I supposed to add it manually in rc.conf as a user module or is it perfectly fine to leave it as it is?
Thanks in advance.

@Trilby
I think you got me all wrong there. My country is usually featured with two mirrors, one being http and the other a ftp one. It is those two that comment out. The rest of the mirrors obviously stay commented
@Terminator
The thing I wonder about is why it inserts itself in the User specified modules when I am not using nfs. Just because nfs-utils is installed even if it is not set up as far as I have checked? If I needed it, or any other user I would expect the user to add it him/herself instead of this automatized way I guess.
@tomk
Thanks for the link. But, honestly speaking, after reading the information you provided I still don't see a concrete reason of why to avoid ftp mirrors. I must confess that I am trying to figure out if the use of a ftp mirror together with the http one might have lead to the problems I am experiencing these days.
The notification appears just like #5 says.
@falconindy
The only reason for this module to be inserted automatically is to have the nfs-utils installed even if nfs is not set up at this time?

Looking for help to improve Airport performance over LAN (WAN is fine)

Ok, I've read through several threads on this forum that address problems people are having with slow performance with Airport. I've also checked out all of the Apple KBs that address Airport, recommended settings. Unfortunately my issue isn't addressed by anything I've read to date.
The bottom line is that both download and upload performance between any of my devices and the internet is fine, no problems. I am paying for 30MBps download from Verizon FIOS, I routinely get 20, and I'm guessing that the delta is Verizon's problem, not my network's. However, streaming from my media server to another device on the wireless LAN is a different story entirely. I get somewhere between 1 and 2 MBps, tops, and this poses big problems for streaming music and movies.
My network is comprised of 3 Airport Expresses. One of them is a MC414LL/A model. This one is connected to my Verizon FIOS Actiontec MI424WR router (which I have set to bridge-mode according to the instructions provided at http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17679150-Howto-make-ActionTec-MI424WR-a-network -bridge) via CAT5 ethernet. This Airport Express is set to "create a network" network mode, "802.11 only (5GHz) - 802.11b/g/n" radio mode (although I have also tried "802.11 only (5GHz) - 802.11/n only (2.4 GHz)" radio mode, and this didn't solve the problem). Finally, I have chosen 2.4 and 5GHz channels that have little interference (2 and 161 respectively). My other two Airport Expresses are MB321LL/A models and are set to "Extend a wireless network" network mode, with the 5GHz network chosen as the network that they extend. (I have tried switching over to having them extend the 2.4GHz network, and performance gets worse, not better.)
I am using a late 2009 Mac Mini as a media server. It is connected to the 5GHz network (though I've tried the 2.4GHz network), and it runs XBMC and JRiver media servers (not simultaneously, either one or the other.) I have a PS3 and a Sony Blu Ray player, each plugged into one of the MB321LL/A Airport Expresses via CAT5 ethernet, and I stream media to each of these devices via one or the other media server (both devices are DNLA-enabled). My Mac Mini has a 3TB external hard drive connected via FireWire 800, which is where all of my media resides. In addition to streaming media over the network, I have a TV plugged directly into the Mac Mini. When I play media to this TV, performance is outstanding, so I'm confident my poor performance to the PS3 and Sony BDP is a network issue, not an issue with the external drive.
Although my building has several other wireless networks, only one of them is 5 GHz, and it isn't using channel 161. The 2.4 GHz band is crowded with several networks, although channel 2 is usually in the clear. I have tried switching let Airport choose a channel automatically, and I haven't noticed a difference. It has occurred to me that the problem could be with how I bridged the Verizon Actiontec router and not with any of the Airports, but I don't get any errors (e.g. double NAT errors, which some people who have bridged improperly get), and I am pleased with my download and upload speeds to the internet. The issue is only on my LAN. Finally, yes, all of my firmware is up to date, version 7.6.3 on all three Airport Expresses.
Can anyone offer me suggestions for how I can get better performance streaming media from my server to the two playback devices? Since all 3 Airport Expresses support 5GHz, I'd have thought I'd be able to take advantage of 802.11n speeds when streaming between them. (MB321LL/A supports "Draft N", but does this matter?) With the settings that I'm currently using, I can't stream faster than 2MBps (and that's on a good day), which is below what I ought to be able to get rom 802.11g. This is especially problematic when I try to stream hi res (96 MHz / 24 bit or higher) music files, whether uncompressed or compressed. I hear awful pulsing sounds through my speakers. If I pause the track and let my streaming device buffer, I might get 10 or 15 seconds of clean playback, but then it starts the pulsing again as soon as the buffered music is finished playing. On occasion when I stream music from my iPhone via Airplay to one of the Airport Expresses, I get clean playback most of the time, but on occasion the music cuts out. (It's my understanding the Airplay requires ~800 Kbps, which seems consistent with my LAN speed usually being between 1 and 2 Mbps but sometimes dropping).
I have iStubler and I've used the Apple network diagnostics -- these are the tools that led me to choose channels 2 and 161 for 2.4 and 5GHz respectively. I'm sure I could be using these tools to learn more about my network's performance, but I'm sure what to look for.
Thanks for your suggestions.

Ok, cool. I'm really glad that the issue has been isolated. Thanks a ton for your insight!
Hopefully I can find a spot where the signal strength of the hub is noticably better but that isn't too inconvenient for an ethernet run. My Sony BDP, which is the device connected to the problem basestation, has wifi capability, so I could always ditch the ethernet cable if the best spot for the basestation doesn't permit a cable run. But I'm aware that ethernet usually offers faster transfer speeds than wifi. Moreover, I'm not sure that the Sony BDP supports 5GHz. It might be a 2.4GHz-only device, in which case I'll have new interference issues to contend with, since like I said in my original post, there are several other 2.4GHz networks in my building.
Anyhow, now that I understand the problem, I can figure out a solution. Thanks again.

How can I improve performance over a Branch Office IPsec vpn tunnel between and SA540 and an SA520

Hello,
I just deployed one Cisco SA540 and three SA520s.
The SA540 is at the Main Site.
The three SA520s are the the spoke sites.
Main Site:
Downstream Speed: 32 Mbps
Upstream Speed: 9.4 Mbps
Spoke Site#1:
Downstream Speed: 3.6 Mbps
Upstream Speed: 7.2 Mbps (yes, the US is faster than the DS at the time the speed test was taken).
The SA tunnels are "Established"
I see packets being tranmsitted and received.
Pinging across the tunnel has an average speed of 32 ms (which is good).
DNS resolves names to ip addresses flawlessly and quickly across the Inter-network.
But it takes from 10 to 15 minutes to log on to the domain from the Spoke Site#1 to the Main Site across the vpn tunnel.
It takes about 15 minutes to print across the vpn tunnel.
The remedy this, we have implemented Terminal Services across the Internet.
Printing takes about 1 minute over the Terminal Service Connection, while it takes about 15 minutes over the VPN.
Logging on to the network takes about 10 minutes over the vpn tunnel.
Using an LOB application takes about 2 minutes per transaction across the vpn tunnel; it takes seconds using Terminal Services.
I have used ASAs before in other implementation without any issues at all.
I am wondering if I replaced the SAs with ASAs, that they may fix my problem.
I wanted to go Small Business Pro, to take advantage of the promotions and because I am a Select Certified Partner, but from my experience, these SA vpn tunnels are unuseable.
I opened a case with Small Business Support on Friday evening, but they couldnt even figure out how to rename an IKE Policy Name (I figured out that you had to delete the IKE Policy; you cannot rename them once they are created).
Maybe the night weekend shift has a skeleton crew, and the best engineers are available at that time or something....i dont know.
I just know that my experience with the Cisco TAC has been great for the last 10 years.
My short experience with the Cisco Small Business Support Center has not been as great at all.
Bottom Line:
I am going to open another case with the Day Shift tomorrow and see if they can find a way to speed things up.
Now this is not just happening between the Main Site and Spoke Site #1 above. It is also happeninng between the Main Site and Spoke #2 (I think Spoke#2 has a Download Speed of about 3Mbps and and Upload Speed of about 0.5 Mbps.
Please help.
I would hate to dismiss SA5xx series without making sure it is not just a simple configuration setting.

Hi Anthony,
I agree!. My partner wants to just replace the SA5xxs with ASAs, as we have never had problems with ASA vpn performance.
But I want to know WHY this is happening too.
I will definitely run a sniffer trace to see what is happening.
Here are some other things I have learned from the Cisco Small Business Support Center (except for Item 1 which I learned from you!)
1. Upgrade the SA540 at the Main Site to 2.1.45.
2a. For cable connections, use the standard MTU of 1500 bytes.
2.b For DSL, use the following command to determine the largets MTU that will be sent without packet fragmentation:
ping -f -l packetsize
Perform the items below to see if this increases performance:
I was told by the Cisco Small Business Support Center that setting up a Manual Policy is not recommended; I am not sure why they stated this.
3a. Lower the IKE encryption algorithm from "AES-128" to DES.
3b. Lower the IKE authentication algorithm to MD5
3c. Also do the above for the VPN Policy
Any input is welcome!

MPD over NFS which is not on LAN but over Internet

Hello,
I tried MPD on a raspberry pi and a NFSv4 mount over vpn over internet.
Suffice to say, I was surprised when I saw mpd actually attempting to *read* one and every file in the huge 500GB repository. What the hell. Why does it need to "read" in the whole file??
Is there an alternative to mpd with similar capabilities, that doesnt suck? Or should I run mpd on the main server - but how do I then get the sound/mp3s to the raspberry pi?

HiImTye wrote:
you could do library updates from the NFS server and save the library info to the NFS share, then point your MPD server you use to listen on to those library files. then you don't have to struggle with network speeds on updates.
but this does make me curious why it is reading the entire songs. it could just be that you have a lot of songs so that it seems like it is? idk
I scp'ed over the database file from main server which had indexed/updated the db with about 80k songs.
Then mounted the nfs share to the rasperry pi to the same absolute paths as on the main server (why not).
This works fine, I see only the songs that I play are transferred quite fast, playing is almost instantenous, and they seem to be cached somewhere. Seeking within files is also fast, especially once already played.
Now as you say, the database file needs to be kept in sync between the NFS server and raspberry, one way would be to put it as well in some nfs share, or sshfs or whatever, or even cronjob it with rsync, since I wont be doing database updates/adding albums that often on the main server.
Would be good if something like this was documented somewhere. Like the wiki. And an option in mpd to ignore update commands to its database - thats now dangerous - it does read all the files, and even if it only tries to read headers - for some shares such as 1 or 2TB of songs, thats too much. Now the mpd on rasperry is more of a proxy.
So yes, this does work now, the slight downside is that the android client mpdroid is not that good - it doesnt respect volume keys when not in view'and such, but one can live with that.

Performance over DG from mysql to oracle very slow for inserts

configured het services over gateway from oracle 11.2.0.4 to mysql 5.6
Have a table I want to pull over into oracle. 1000 rows.
On mysql : create view vw_mysql_t1 as select columns from my_mysql_table.
On Oracle: create view vw_ora as select columns from vw_mysql_t1@mysql_link
On oracle: select * from vw_ora data returns data in 3-4 seconds.
however, try an insert to get the data over
     insert into a_table_on_oracle
         (select * from vw_ora)
takes 11-12 minutes.
create table as or insert into same performance. Tried just inserting 1 row and same performance 11-12 minutes. any ideas?

cant seem to get the trace file to generate. any ideas, I have the config as below, the gateway is working, I can select data no problem from table@dcv   , just performance is terrible
logfile not in $ORACLE_HOME/hs/log
or
/tmp
this is my tns
dcv =
(DESCRIPTION =
    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = tcp)(HOST = <IP of server>)(PORT = 1521))
    (CONNECT_DATA =
      (SID = dcv)
    (HS = OK)
this is my init file
# HS init parameters
HS_FDS_CONNECT_INFO=dcv
HS_FDS_TRACE_LEVEL=255
HS_FDS_SHAREABLE_NAME = /usr/lib64/libmyodbc5a.so
HS_RPC_FETCH_SIZE=50000
HS_ROWID_CACHE_SIZE=10000
#HS_LONG_PIECE_TRANSFER_SIZE=1024
HS_LONG_PIECE_TRANSFER_SIZE=65536
HS_LANGUAGE=AMERICAN_AMERICA.WE8ISO8859P15    ## The Oracle RDBMS is using a Unicode characterset [ID 756186.1]
HS_FDS_FETCH_ROWS=1                           ## This is select int datatype
HS_FDS_SQLLEN_INTERPRETATION=32               ## This is to select NULL values via DB Link [ID 554409.1]
# ODBC specific environment variables
set ODBCINI=/etc/odbc.ini
more /etc/odbc.ini
[dcv]
Driver       = /usr/lib64/libmyodbc5a.so
SERVER       = <IP of mysql server>
PORT         = 3306
USER         = un
Password     = pw
Database     = dcv
OPTION       = 3
CHARSET      = latin1
[ODBC]
TRACE        = ON     # also tried 0 and 1 and DEBUG and USER
TraceFile    = /tmp/odbc.trace
10:11:19 SQL> select count(*) from "vw_t1"@dcv;
COUNT(*)
     24794
Elapsed: 00:00:00.23
10:11:45 SQL>
10:11:57 SQL>
10:11:57 SQL>
10:11:57 SQL>
10:11:57 SQL>
10:11:58 SQL> create table backup_data.delete_me as
10:11:59   2 select   * from
10:11:59   3        "vw_t1"@dcv;
Table created.
Elapsed: 00:09:47.07
10:21:49 SQL>
Theres around 130 columns, varchars, numerics and floats. Is there a conversion going on that would take that long?

Write permission over nfs for transmission files

Hi all,
I have a strange problem and I hope you could help me.
Context :
I have a server with :
transmission-daemon to remotely download torrent
pyload to remotely download ddl
nfs server to provide write access over lan for linux clients
samba server to provide write access over lan for windows clients
And of course, a client wich connect to nfs share to manage files .
Problem :
nfs clients have write permission over files created by pyload and basic users of servers but not on transmission files.
otherwise, samba or local basic user have write access on all files (even transmission)
Configuration :
On the server, I have a storage mounted in /mnt/data binded to /srv/nfs4/.
Transmission save files with mask 022 in directory :
/mnt/data/downloads/
Pyload with mask 022 in :
/mnt/data/downloads/ddl/
Nfs give access to /srv/nfs4 with wirte permission :
/srv/nfs4/ 192.168.100.0/24(rw,no_subtree_check)
Infos :
With I know and I tested, I can tell you :
I have 770 (and not 700) permissions on /mnt/data for local users on servers
Permission files should not be the cause. nfs and smbd are owned by root so logically, both of them can write.
Smb clients can write with every permissions (777,770,700) on files
Nfs clients seems have permission of "other". No write with 700 and 770. But write access with 777
pyload files are owned by pyload:pyload
transmission files are owned by transmission:transmission
basic users files are owned by [the_user]:users
So the problem exists only for transmission (not pyload) owned files from nfs client (not samba) and files are the same permissions .. I don't understand.
I will try with more verbose nfs server but I take every idea
Thanks you.
Last edited by xp-1000 (2015-05-01 12:46:00)

The problem could be related to Mavericks permission problems. You can try the Bridge fix:
Open Finder > (go) Computer > Macintosh HD (for me) > Users > Click once on the Home icon (main admin) > Get Info >
click on lock and authorise bottom right > click on cog wheel drop down > click on 'Apply to enclosed items' > OK

No FTP access over WAN with Airport Extreme 802.11n v7.3.2

hi there,
I've read through a few different posts on this topic (both here and in other forums) but I can't seem to find the answers I need.
I have an AEBS n with version 7.3.2 of Airport Utility. attached to the AEBS is a hard drive. I want to enable file sharing (mostly FTP, but AFP would be fine too) to access the drive through the WAN port.
here's what I've done:
- connected a USB drive. This is available through my LAN and is accessible using my OSX account login & password)
- enabled filesharing and "share disks over ethernet WAN port"
- enabled NAT and default host on the AEBS
- configured port mappings for FTP and ARD (I couldn't enable any other file sharing because of a port conflict. Is this because the hard drive connected to the AEBS is already set to use these?)
I created an account with DynDNS to resolve my ip to a domain name.
when I ping either my domain or the IP, I get the same results. it sees my isp but the destination host is unreachable.
port scanning my domain from 20 through 548 shows that 139, 445, and 548 are open. but no 20.
what am I doing wrong here?
thanks in advance

bump

FTP performance over NFS 3

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for