Function result caching

Hi All,
Using Oracle 10g Database, I would like to cache the return value of a pl/sql function. Also, whenever the underlying value changes, the cache entry has to be invalidated. Do we have any supported functionality by Oracle.
Regards

Hi,
Would it work for you to make the function DETERMINISTIC?
Table dropped.
SQL> set serveroutput on
SQL> create table t (x number)
Table created.
SQL> insert into t (x) values (1)
1 row created.
SQL> create or replace package stats
as
  cnt number;
end;
Package created.
SQL> create or replace function f
return number deterministic
is
  the_x number;
begin
  stats.cnt := stats.cnt + 1;
  select x into the_x from t;
  return the_x;
end;
Function created.
SQL> exec stats.cnt := 0
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select count(f), max(f) from all_objects
  COUNT(F)     MAX(F)
     42705          1
1 row selected.
SQL> exec dbms_output.put_line(stats.cnt)
2
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> update t set x = 2
1 row updated.
SQL> commit
Commit complete.
SQL> exec stats.cnt := 0
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select count(f), max(f) from all_objects
  COUNT(F)     MAX(F)
     42705          2
1 row selected.
SQL> exec dbms_output.put_line(stats.cnt)
2
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.Regards
Peter

Similar Messages

  • Function result Cache in oracle 11G

    Hi,
    i am reading the following article and trying to reproduce same set of statements to learn about function result cache.
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/oramag/oracle/07-sep/o57asktom.html
    Details about my output:
    SQL> create or replace
    function not_cached
    ( p_owner in varchar2 )
    return number
    as
    l_cnt number;
    begin
    select count(*)
    into l_cnt
    from t
    where owner = p_owner;
    sys.dbms_lock.sleep(1);
    return l_cnt;
    end;
    Function created.
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.13
    SQL> create or replace
    function cached
    ( p_owner in varchar2 )
    return number
    result_cache
    relies_on(T)
    as
    l_cnt number;
    begin
    select count(*)
    into l_cnt
    from t
    where owner = p_owner;
    dbms_lock.sleep(1);
    return l_cnt;
    end;
    Function created.
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.08
    SQL> exec dbms_output.put_line( not_cached( 'SCOTT' ) );
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    Elapsed: 00:00:01.06
    SQL> exec dbms_output.put_line( not_cached( 'SCOTT' ) );
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    Elapsed: 00:00:01.01
    SQL> SQL> exec dbms_output.put_line( not_cached( 'SCOTT' ) );
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    Elapsed: 00:00:01.02
    SQL> SQL> set serveroutput on
    SQL> exec dbms_output.put_line( not_cached( 'SCOTT' ) );
    0
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    Elapsed: 00:00:01.02
    SQL> SQL> exec dbms_output.put_line( cached( 'SCOTT' ) );
    0
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    Elapsed: 00:00:01.02
    SQL> SQL> exec dbms_output.put_line( cached( 'SCOTT' ) );
    0
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    Elapsed: 00:00:01.02
    SQL> SQL> exec dbms_output.put_line( cached( 'SCOTT' ) );
    0
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL> exec dbms_output.put_line( cached( 'SCOTT' ) );
    0
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    Elapsed: 00:00:01.01
    I am supposed to get the results quickly for "cached" call. However, i still dont see any change in the response time. May i know what i am missing here?
    Thank you
    Giridhar

    Try to play with
    RESULT_CACHE_MAX_SIZE
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28320/initparams206.htm#REFRN10272
    RESULT_CACHE_MAX_RESULT
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28320/initparams205.htm#REFRN10298

  • DB buffer cache vs. SQL query & PL/SQL function result cache

    Hi all,
    Started preparing for OCA cert. just myself using McGraw Hill's exam guide. Have a question about memory structures.
    Actually, DB buffer cache is used to copy e.g. SELECT queries result data blocks, that can be reused by another session (server process).
    There is also additional otion - SQL query & PL/SQL function result cache (from 11g), where also stored the results of such queries.
    Do they do the same thing or nevertheless there is some difference, different purpose?
    thanks in advance...

    There is also additional otion - SQL query & PL/SQL function result cache (from 11g), where also stored the results of such queries.Result cache located in shared pool.So it is one component of shared pool.When server process execute query(and if you configured result cache) then result will store in shared pool.Then next execution time run time mechanism will detect and consider using result cache without executing this query(if data was not changed this is happen detection time)
    Do they do the same thing or nevertheless there is some difference, different purpose?.Buffer cache and result cache are different things and purpose also,but result cache introduced to improve response time of query in 11g(but such mechanism also implemented in 10g subquery execution,in complex query).In buffer cache holds data blocks but not such results.
    Edited by: Chinar on Nov 4, 2011 4:40 AM
    (Removing lots of "But" word from sentences :-) )

  • PL/SQL Function Result Cache?

    Hi all,
    As we know, there's a new feature in 11g, called 'result cache', this 'result cache' can be shared throughout the whole instance, but if I got it right, only sql query result and function return value are cached, right? how about the store procedure, I mean, procedure also has its 'return value'--the output parameter, could it benefit from this new feature?
    Another question is, if my PL/SQL Function just retrieves the table and returns the result without any complicated calculation, is it necessary to enable the 'result cache' mechanism on this Function? because we already have 'db buffer cache' if the only thing we do is to query tables.
    Many thanks.

    Hi Morven,
    As of now, PL/SQL Result cache feature is only enabled for stored functions and not for procedures. This is due to the objectives they achieve. Functions are usually computative and procedures are for logic implementation.
    And for enabling result caching feature for a function, you are the better judge as u can test the performance in both the case. But, i would support enabling the cache because oracle 11g provides Cache as a different SGA component. db_buffer_cache will also be used for buffering other data blocks and not the result sets.
    Hope my explanation is fine.

  • 11g Express Edition Wishlist - include PL/SQL Function Result Cache

    After this thread - Oracle Database 11g XE
    and referencing the Express Edition Licensing Information guide - http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B25329_01/doc/license.102/b25456/toc.htm
    if this one is also on your wish list, just send a reply and support this thread.
    Best regards.

    Tonguc,
    Look where it's listed in the Licencing Information manual:
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/license.111/b28287/editions.htm#BABDJGGI
    It was one of my favorite features in the beta. I was disappointed when it was released as EE-only.
    Doug

  • Client Result Cache Question

    Hi,
    i am not sure, whether the new feature "Client Result Cache" for OCI - Connections is an enterprise only feature or not.
    The Licensing Information at http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/license.112/e10594/editions.htm#CJACGHEB shows this three features are enterprise only:
    Client Side Query Cache
    Query Results Cache
    PL/SQL Function Result Cache
    Which of these are pointing to Client Result Cache? Is it the Query Results Cache? Or something else?
    As an Hint, i am unable to activate the feature on standard edition databases, but i am not sure, if this is the reason or if i am just making some mistakes in configuration/testing.
    Thanks in advance
    Joerg

    we stopped all tests, because it seems to be a enterprise edition only feature.

  • Result cache doubt

    what is the difference if i write relies_on clause or if i dont write it, technically please explain what exactly is the difference ??
    create or replace function tax (i in varchar2)
    return number
    result_cache
    is
    begin
    return i*0.08 ;
    end;
    create or replace function tax (i in varchar2)
    return number
    result_cache relies_on (emp)
    is
    begin
    return i*0.08 ;
    end;

    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/appdev.111/b28370/function.htm#i34368
    RELIES_ON
    Specifies the data sources on which the results of a function depend. For more information, see Using the PL/SQL Function Result Cache. http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/appdev.111/b28370/subprograms.htm#BABFHACJ
    To enable result-caching for a function, use the RESULT_CACHE clause. When a result-cached function is invoked, the system checks the cache. If the cache contains the result from a previous call to the function with the same parameter values, the system returns the cached result to the invoker and does not reexecute the function body. If the cache does not contain the result, the system executes the function body and adds the result (for these parameter values) to the cache before returning control to the invoker.Not sure why are you talking about invalidated data, result_cache just invoked result from a previous call to the function if it exists, if not it executes the function body.
    The clause relies_on just specifies the data sources on which the results of a function depend.
    am i missing something??

  • Does Result Cache Really Work..

    Does Result Cache Really Work..
    We have upgraded to 11.2.0.2 Theere were some corruption issue we were facing cause of using result cache..
    Still the same error after upgrade...
    Is any one here familiar with using result cache..One good thing about result cahce i found it does improve performance.
    But the problem is the datbaase crashes..after it reaches some memory limit..Does any one have good expereince using it..?

    Probably following notes on Oracle Support site can help.
    11g New Feature PL/SQL Function Result Cache [ID 430887.1]
    11g New Feature : SQL Query Result Cache [ID 453567.1]
    PL/SQL Procedures Do Not Switch Result Cache Mode Within The Same Session [ID 556035.1]
    HTH

  • Oracle result cache and functions

    Hi All,
    I am on 11.2 in Linux.
    I want to use Oracle's result cache to cache results of (user defined) functions, which we use in SELECT commands.
    My question is, does result caching work for deterministic and non-deterministic functions ?
    Just curious, how Oracle keeps track of changes being made which affect a function's return value?
    Thoughts please.
    Thanks in advance

    I want to ... cache results of (user defined) functions, which we use in SELECT commands.You have four choices:
    1. Subquery caching - (wrap function call in SELECT) useful for repeated function calls in a single SELECT
    2. Marking function as DETERMINISTIC - inconsistent results across versions, deterministic best reserved for function-based indexes only
    3. Result Cache
    4. Move function logic out of function and inline to the main SQL statement.
    The biggest downside of any function call that is inline to SQL is that it bypasses the read consistency mechanism, actually that's probably the second biggest downside. The biggest downside is normally that their misuse kills performance.
    If your function itself contains SQL then you should seriously reconsider whether you should be using a function.
    does result caching work for deterministic and non-deterministic functions ?Result cache knows nothing about determinism so yes it should be applied regardless.
    Oracle keeps track of changes being made which affect a function's return value?See v$result_cache_dependency.
    The mechanism is very blunt, there is no fine-grained tracking of data changes that may affect your result.
    It's as simple as function F1 relies on table T1. If the data in table T1 changes, invalidate the results in the result cache for F1.

  • Query result cache with functions

    Hi all,
    one of my colleagues has found a little bit weird behavior of a query result cache. He has set result_cache_mode = 'FORCE' (but it can be reproduced with a result_cache hint too) and suddenly functions called from the query get executed twice (for the first time) .
    An easy example:
    alter session set result_cache_mode = 'FORCE';
    create sequence test_seq;
    create or replace function test_f(i number)
    return number
    is                  
    begin
      dbms_output.put_line('TEST_F executed');
      --autonomous transaction or package variable can be used too
      return test_seq.nextval;
    end;
    prompt First call
    select test_f(1) from dual;
    prompt Second call
    select test_f(1) from dual;
    drop sequence test_seq;
    drop function test_f;
    First call
    TEST_F(1)
             2
    TEST_F executed
    TEST_F executed
    Second call
    TEST_F(1)
             1
    As you can see - for the first time the function is executed twice and return the value from the second execution. When I execute the query again it returns the value from the first execution... but it doesn't matter, problem is in the double execution. Our developers used to send emails via select (it's easier for them):
    select send_mail(...) from dual;
    ... and now the customers complains that they get emails twice
    And now the question - is there any way, hot to get rid of this behavior (without changing the parameter back or rewriting code)? I thought that the result cache is automatically disabled for non-deterministic functions...or is this an expected behavior?
    Thanks,
    Ivan

    Interesting.. you are right:
    SELECT /*+ RESULT_CACHE */ 'dog' FROM DUAL;
    And at the second execution:
    | Id  | Operation        | Name                       | Rows  | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |                            |     1 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   1 |  RESULT CACHE    | cc5k01xyqz3ypf9t0j28r5gtd1 |       |            |          |
    |   2 |   FAST DUAL      |                            |     1 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    Hmmm..

  • Oracle 11g/R2 Query Result Cache - Incremental Update

    Hi,
    In Oracle 11g/R2, I created replica of HR.Employees table & executed the following statement (+Although using SUM() function is non-logical in this case, but just testifying the result+)
    STEP - 1
    SELECT      /+ RESULT_CACHE */ employee_id, first_name, last_name, SUM(salary)*
    FROM           HR.Employees_copy
    WHERE      department_id = 20
    GROUP BY      employee_id, first_name, last_name;
    EMPLOYEE_ID      FIRST_NAME LAST_NAME     SUM(SALARY)
    202           Pat           Fay          6000
    201           Michael           Hartstein     13000
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 3837552314
    | Id | Operation           | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT      | | 2 | 130 | 4 (25)| 00:00:01 |
    | 1 | RESULT CACHE      | 3acbj133x8qkq8f8m7zm0br3mu | | | | |
    | 2 | HASH GROUP BY      | | 2 | 130 | 4 (25)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL     | EMPLOYEES_COPY | 2 | 130 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------     Statistics
    0 recursive calls
    0 db block gets
    0 consistent gets
    0 physical reads
    0 redo size
    *690* bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
    416 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
    2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
    0 sorts (memory)
    0 sorts (disk)
    2 rows processed
    STEP - 2
    INSERT INTO HR.employees_copy
    VALUES(200, 'Dummy', 'User','[email protected]',NULL, sysdate, 'MANAGER',5000, NULL,NULL,20);
    STEP - 3
    SELECT      /*+ RESULT_CACHE */ employee_id, first_name, last_name, SUM(salary)
    FROM           HR.Employees_copy
    WHERE      department_id = 20
    GROUP BY      employee_id, first_name, last_name;
    EMPLOYEE_ID      FIRST_NAME LAST_NAME SUM(SALARY)
    202      Pat      Fay      6000
    201      Michael      Hartstein      13000
    200      Dummy User      5000
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.03
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 3837552314
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT |          | 3 | 195 | 4 (25)| 00:00:01 |
    | 1 | RESULT CACHE | 3acbj133x8qkq8f8m7zm0br3mu | | | | |
    | 2 | HASH GROUP BY | | 3 | 195 | 4 (25)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMPLOYEES_COPY | 3 | 195 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
         Statistics
    0 recursive calls
    0 db block gets
    4 consistent gets
    0 physical reads
    0 redo size
    *714* bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
    416 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
    2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
    0 sorts (memory)
    0 sorts (disk)
    3 rows processed
    In the execution plan of STEP-3, against ID-1 the operation RESULT CACHE is shown which shows the result has been retrieved directly from Result cache. Does this mean that Oracle Server has Incrementally Retrieved the resultset?
    Because, before the execution of STEP-2, the cache contained only 2 records. Then 1 record was inserted but after STEP-3, a total of 3 records was returned from cache. Does this mean that newly inserted row is retrieved from database and merged to the cached result of STEP-1?
    If Oracle server has incrementally retrieved and merged newly inserted record, what mechanism is being used by the Oracle to do so?
    Regards,
    Wasif
    Edited by: 965300 on Oct 15, 2012 12:25 AM

    965300 wrote:
    Hi,
    In Oracle 11g/R2, I created replica of HR.Employees table & executed the following statement (+Although using SUM() function is non-logical in this case, but just testifying the result+)
    STEP - 1
    SELECT      /+ RESULT_CACHE */ employee_id, first_name, last_name, SUM(salary)*
    FROM           HR.Employees_copy
    WHERE      department_id = 20
    GROUP BY      employee_id, first_name, last_name;
    EMPLOYEE_ID      FIRST_NAME LAST_NAME     SUM(SALARY)
    202           Pat           Fay          6000
    201           Michael           Hartstein     13000
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 3837552314
    | Id | Operation           | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT      | | 2 | 130 | 4 (25)| 00:00:01 |
    | 1 | RESULT CACHE      | 3acbj133x8qkq8f8m7zm0br3mu | | | | |
    | 2 | HASH GROUP BY      | | 2 | 130 | 4 (25)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL     | EMPLOYEES_COPY | 2 | 130 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------     Statistics
    0 recursive calls
    0 db block gets
    0 consistent gets
    0 physical reads
    0 redo size
    *690* bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
    416 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
    2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
    0 sorts (memory)
    0 sorts (disk)
    2 rows processed
    STEP - 2
    INSERT INTO HR.employees_copy
    VALUES(200, 'Dummy', 'User','[email protected]',NULL, sysdate, 'MANAGER',5000, NULL,NULL,20);
    STEP - 3
    SELECT      /*+ RESULT_CACHE */ employee_id, first_name, last_name, SUM(salary)
    FROM           HR.Employees_copy
    WHERE      department_id = 20
    GROUP BY      employee_id, first_name, last_name;
    EMPLOYEE_ID      FIRST_NAME LAST_NAME SUM(SALARY)
    202      Pat      Fay      6000
    201      Michael      Hartstein      13000
    200      Dummy User      5000
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.03
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 3837552314
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT |          | 3 | 195 | 4 (25)| 00:00:01 |
    | 1 | RESULT CACHE | 3acbj133x8qkq8f8m7zm0br3mu | | | | |
    | 2 | HASH GROUP BY | | 3 | 195 | 4 (25)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMPLOYEES_COPY | 3 | 195 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
         Statistics
    0 recursive calls
    0 db block gets
    4 consistent gets
    0 physical reads
    0 redo size
    *714* bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
    416 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
    2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
    0 sorts (memory)
    0 sorts (disk)
    3 rows processed
    In the execution plan of STEP-3, against ID-1 the operation RESULT CACHE is shown which shows the result has been retrieved directly from Result cache. Does this mean that Oracle Server has Incrementally Retrieved the resultset?
    Because, before the execution of STEP-2, the cache contained only 2 records. Then 1 record was inserted but after STEP-3, a total of 3 records was returned from cache. Does this mean that newly inserted row is retrieved from database and merged to the cached result of STEP-1?
    If Oracle server has incrementally retrieved and merged newly inserted record, what mechanism is being used by the Oracle to do so?
    Regards,
    Wasif
    Edited by: 965300 on Oct 15, 2012 12:25 AMNo, the RESULT CACHE operation doesn't necessarily mean that the results are retrieved from there. It could be being
    written to there.
    Look at the number of consistent gets: it's zero in the first step (I assume you had already run this query before) and I would
    conclude that the data is being read from the result cache.
    In the third step there are 4 consistent gets. I would conclude that the data is being written to the result cache, a fourth step repeating
    the SQL should show zero consistent gets and that would be the results being read.

  • Result Cache in oracle 11g release 2.0.2.0

    All,
    Few months back I was trying Result Cache feature of 11g release 2.0.1.0. That time oracle mentioned that they have 3 modes to use this feature by setting result_cache_mode paramter to AUTO, FORCE or MANUAL. With AUTO mode (result_cache_mode=AUTO) you can identify queries that may benefit from result cache. I would like to know whcih views or function I should see where it captures this information.
    In 11.2.0.1.0 documentation it was referencing some views (I totally don't remember those views names) and said those will be available in 11.2.0.2.0.
    Is anyone know about this?
    Thanks in advance.

    user2486753 wrote:
    Though oracle doc doesn't say about AUTO it is still accepts that value and caches the result of the SQL query if you add /*+ result cache */ hint to the SQL.
    I know that they did mentioned in 112010 some where that it will help users to find which SQL's are good candidates for caching by running the application for a while. I just couldn't fine it.If we are adding AUTO and still passing the hint, its the same behavior as like MANUAL. I am not sure that I have seen the value anywhere and neither its there in the docs too.
    HTH
    Aman....

  • Does OCI client result cache and oracle UCP work together?

    I'm using Oracle 11.2.1.0. I've set up FCF and enabled OCI result cache on server side, so on client side, I'm using UCP for failover.
    this is my datasource configuration:
    <Resource name="jdbc/MyPool"
    auth="Container"
    factory="oracle.ucp.jdbc.PoolDataSourceImpl"
    type="oracle.ucp.jdbc.PoolDataSource"
    connectionFactoryClassName="oracle.jdbc.pool.OracleDataSource"
    url="jdbc:oracle:oci:@dbhost:1521/myDb"
    user="db_user"
    password="db_password"
    fastConnectionFailoverEnabled="true"
    onsConfiguration=""
    connectionPoolName="dbPool"
    initialPoolSize="5"
    minPoolSize="5"
    maxPoolSize="25"
    connectionWaitTimeout="10000"
    inactiveConnectionTimeout="120000"
    abandonConnectionTimeout="60"
    validateConnectionOnBorrow="true"
    sqlForValidateConnection="select user from dual"
    maxStatements="30"/>
    I've enabled OCI client result cache.
    I use /*+ result_cache */ in my query to take advantage of the result cache.
    so I execute the following scenario:
    i) select /*+ result_cache */ value from myTable where id=1; (this returns a result.)
    ii) update myTable to set a different value for id=1 record;
    iii) run select query again; (this should return a different result. oci result cache gets updated when table changes.)
    if I take out
    "sqlForValidateConnection" and/or "validateConnectionOnBorrow" (i.e. disable sql validation on borrow), the 2nd query after table update doesn't show the latest result. it's still showing the old query result.
    is this a bug? that UCP validation on borrow has an impact on OCI result cache function? this doesn't happen if using dbcp java connection pooling with OCI result cache.

    it turns out I ran the test against an oracle server that doesnt have FCF configured, nor ONS.
    once i switched to a correct oracle cluster, my test passed.

  • Result Cache value

    my table frequently updating value.I want to retrieve updated value from result cache not from the table .
    I used result cache function for the same.updated value is coming from table and not updated value from result cache.
    Is it possible to retrieve updated value from result cache.or any the memory area.
    I have below query
    SELECT /*+RESULT_CACHE*/SALARY FROM EMPLOYEES WHERE EMPLOYEE_ID = 160
    at the first time above query retrieving value from the disk.
    next time it is retrieving value from result cache. that is correct.
    But whenever salary is updating for the employee_id =160.
    after that that query retrieving value from disk. this is also correct.
    But i want to retrieve value after update the salary for that employee_id=10 from result cache not from disk.I want to any mechanism is available in oracle that can retrieve value from result cache for the same input if record is updated.
    Edited by: ibney on Mar 20, 2013 2:15 AM

    Hi Karthick,
    I know that .i have another question .
    I have below query
    SELECT /*+RESULT_CACHE*/SALARY FROM EMPLOYEES WHERE EMPLOYEE_ID = 160
    at the first time above query retrieving value from the disk.
    next time it is retrieving value from result cache. that is correct.
    But whenever salary is updating for the employee_id =160.
    after that that query retrieving value from disk. this is also correct.
    But i want to retrieve value after update the salary for that employee_id=10 from result cache not from disk.I want to any mechanism is available in oracle that can retrieve value from result cache for the same input if record is updated.
    Edited by: ibney on Mar 20, 2013 2:16 AM
    Edited by: ibney on Mar 20, 2013 2:16 AM

  • Using the client result cache without the query result cache

    I have constructed a client in C# using ODP.NET to connect to an Oracle database and want to perform client result caching for some of my queries.
    This is done using a result_cache hint in the query.
    select /*+ result_cache */ * from table
    As far as I can tell query result caching on the server is done using the same hint, so I was wondering if there was any way to differentiate between the two? I want the query results to be cached on the client, but not on the server.
    The only way I have found to do this is to disable all caching on the server, but I don't want to do this as I want to use the server cache for PL/SQL function results.
    Thanks.

    e3a934c9-c4c2-4c80-b032-d61d415efd4f wrote:
    I have constructed a client in C# using ODP.NET to connect to an Oracle database and want to perform client result caching for some of my queries.
    This is done using a result_cache hint in the query.
    select /*+ result_cache */ * from table 
    As far as I can tell query result caching on the server is done using the same hint, so I was wondering if there was any way to differentiate between the two? I want the query results to be cached on the client, but not on the server.
    The only way I have found to do this is to disable all caching on the server, but I don't want to do this as I want to use the server cache for PL/SQL function results.
    Thanks.
    You haven't provided ANY information about how you configured the result cache. Different parameters are used for configuring the client versus the server result cache so you need to post what, if anything, you configured.
    Post the code you executed when you set the 'client_result_cache_lag' and 'client_result_cache_size' parameters so we can see what values you used. Also post the results of querying those parameters after you set them that show that they really are set.
    You also need to post your app code that shows that you are using the OCI statements are used when you want to use client side result cacheing.
    See the OCI dev guide
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/appdev.111/b28395/oci10new.htm#sthref1491
    Statement Caching in OCI
    Statement caching refers to the feature that provides and manages a cache of statements for each session. In the server, it means that cursors are ready to be used without the need to parse the statement again. Statement caching can be used with connection pooling and with session pooling, and will improve performance and scalability. It can be used without session pooling as well. The OCI calls that implement statement caching are:
      OCIStmtPrepare2()
      OCIStmtRelease()

Maybe you are looking for

  • Pages version 5.0 installed, but when I launch it's 4.0.5.  How do I fix this?

    I installed OS X version 10.9 successfully on my 2009 iMac.  After installation, the latest versions of Keynote, Numbers, and Pages downloaded as an update.  When I launch Pages, it is still the 4.0.5 version.  Both Keynote and Numbers are the new ve

  • My 12 year old Canoscan 8800f has suddenly stopped working.

    My 12 year old Canoscan 8800f has suddenly stopped working. When I press the power button a light comes on inside, but after a bit of whiring it goes out and the scanner switches off. Is there a solution or should I buy a new scanner? Solved! Go to S

  • Need to delete the record based on the checkbox xselected

    I am displaying the data from tables vbrk and vbrp.along   with that  data i am displaying the checkbox also. here my requirement is when ever the user checks the checkboxes and click on delete button  the checkbox selected items should deleted and 

  • Email notification is not send to contact person in SRM 7.0

    Hi Friends,         I am in SRM 7.0 and SP03. I am using program '/SAPSRM/OFFLINEAPPROVALSEND' to send notification to approver.               Email notification is not sending to contact person in SRM 7.0 after all approvers approved the shopping ca

  • Calculating next month for December month

    Hi, I am able to get the value for a measures in which one measure calculates value for month selected through prompt and another measure calculates values based on next month. So I have restriced measure 1 like this in where condition MONTH_V.MONTH_