FWSM Default port channel?

I'm doing some L2 cleanups across mutliple 6509E environments and I've found something consistent that I can't find in documentation.
On all my pairs of 6509s where I have FWSMs bundled (6509-A has FWSM-1 is Slot 1 and 6509-B has FWSM-2 in Slot 1) I also have a port channel 305. Obviously when I do a "show run" or "show int desc" I don't see anything in slot one. It's a service module. But the port channel is referencing ports 1/1-6. And it's all in service/up. I was about to delete this as I thought it was some leftover config (TEST 6509s) until I went and saw the same things on our PROD 6509s. Can anyone explain this or provide some documentation on it? Is it cosmetic? Necessary? Can I delete it as part of my audit cleanup? Don't want to mess with it even in TEST without some information. Nothing on google that's clear and I can't find anything on CCO.
6509-1#sho etherch 305 summ
Flags:  D - down        P - bundled in port-channel
        I - stand-alone s - suspended
        H - Hot-standby (LACP only)
        R - Layer3      S - Layer2
        U - in use      N - not in use, no aggregation
        f - failed to allocate aggregator
        M - not in use, no aggregation due to minimum links not met
        m - not in use, port not aggregated due to minimum links not met
        u - unsuitable for bundling
        d - default port
        w - waiting to be aggregated
Number of channel-groups in use: 11
Number of aggregators:           11
Group  Port-channel  Protocol    Ports
------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
305    Po305(SU)        -        Gi1/1(P)       Gi1/2(P)       Gi1/3(P)      
                                 Gi1/4(P)       Gi1/5(P)       Gi1/6(P)      
Last applied Hash Distribution Algorithm:   -
6509-1#sho etherch 305 det 
Group state = L2
Ports: 6   Maxports = 8
Port-channels: 1 Max Port-channels = 1
Protocol:    -
Minimum Links: 0
                Ports in the group:
Port: Gi1/1
Port state    = Up Mstr In-Bndl
Channel group = 305         Mode = On      Gcchange = -
Port-channel  = Po305       GC   =   -         Pseudo port-channel = Po305
Port index    = 0           Load = 0x41        Protocol =    -
Age of the port in the current state: 46d:06h:53m:39s
Port: Gi1/2
Port state    = Up Mstr In-Bndl
Channel group = 305         Mode = On      Gcchange = -
Port-channel  = Po305       GC   =   -         Pseudo port-channel = Po305
Port index    = 1           Load = 0x02        Protocol =    -
Age of the port in the current state: 46d:06h:53m:39s
Port: Gi1/3
Port state    = Up Mstr In-Bndl
Channel group = 305         Mode = On      Gcchange = -
Port-channel  = Po305       GC   =   -         Pseudo port-channel = Po305
Port index    = 2           Load = 0x04        Protocol =    -
Age of the port in the current state: 46d:06h:53m:41s
Port: Gi1/4
Port state    = Up Mstr In-Bndl
Channel group = 305         Mode = On      Gcchange = -
Port-channel  = Po305       GC   =   -         Pseudo port-channel = Po305
Port index    = 3           Load = 0x88        Protocol =    -
Age of the port in the current state: 46d:06h:53m:41s
Port: Gi1/5
Port state    = Up Mstr In-Bndl
Channel group = 305         Mode = On      Gcchange = -
Port-channel  = Po305       GC   =   -         Pseudo port-channel = Po305
Port index    = 4           Load = 0x10        Protocol =    -
Age of the port in the current state: 46d:06h:53m:41s
Port: Gi1/6
Port state    = Up Mstr In-Bndl
Channel group = 305         Mode = On      Gcchange = -
Port-channel  = Po305       GC   =   -         Pseudo port-channel = Po305
Port index    = 5           Load = 0x20        Protocol =    -
Age of the port in the current state: 46d:06h:53m:41s
                Port-channels in the group:
Port-channel: Po305
Age of the Port-channel   = 46d:06h:55m:56s
Logical slot/port   = 14/11          Number of ports = 6
GC                  = 0x00000000      HotStandBy port = null
Port state          = Port-channel Ag-Inuse
Protocol            =    -
Fast-switchover     = disabled
Load share deferral = disabled  
Ports in the Port-channel:
Index   Load   Port     EC state        No of bits
------+------+------+------------------+-----------
  0     41     Gi1/1    On    2
  1     02     Gi1/2    On    1
  2     04     Gi1/3    On    1
  3     88     Gi1/4    On    2
  4     10     Gi1/5    On    1
  5     20     Gi1/6    On    1
Time since last port bundled:    46d:06h:53m:41s    Gi1/6
Last applied Hash Distribution Algorithm:   -
NOC-SW-ITEST-AGG1#

The connection between the FWSM and the switch is a 6-GB 802.1Q trunking EtherChannel. This EtherChannel is automatically created when you install the FWSM.
http://cisconetwork.org.ua/1587051893/ch04lev1sec1.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/fwsm/fwsm23/configuration/guide/switch.pdf
Thanks
Ajay

Similar Messages

  • Right way of configuring higher MTU over a Port Channel

    Hi guys,
    I have a running critical Port-Channel between two locations.
    Here's the config
    SW1:
    interface Port-channel2
     switchport
     switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
     switchport mode trunk
    end
    interface GigabitEthernet1/45
     switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
     switchport mode trunk
     channel-protocol lacp
     channel-group 2 mode active
    end
    interface GigabitEthernet1/46
     switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
     switchport mode trunk
     channel-protocol lacp
     channel-group 2 mode active
    end
    SW2
    interface GigabitEthernet1/1
     switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
     switchport mode trunk
     channel-protocol lacp
     channel-group 2 mode passive
    end
    interface GigabitEthernet1/2
     switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
     switchport mode trunk
     channel-protocol lacp
     channel-group 2 mode passive
    end
    interface Port-channel2
     switchport
     switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
     switchport mode trunk
    end
    Now I need to increase the MTU from default value to 9198. What the right way to do it and avoid any connectivity loss, PortChannel restart.
    Does it matter what switch I start first?
    Thanks!
    L.E. both SW are WS-C4948

    Hi,
    Because you are using layer 2 interfaces - there is no fragmentation support at layer 2, and interfaces receiving frames which have an unsupported size will be dropped.
    I think the best way for you to proceed is to lab this up; and verify what happens - it may be that you need to make changes on switches at either end of the channel within a very short time frame to prevent too large an outage.
     When you are ready to maike your change - think the best way to do this is to use the interface range command, and apply the 'mtu' command to all the interfaces in this range. I don't think it matters which switch you apply this change to first, and I don't believe if you are hinting at the 802.3ad (controlled by system-priority) decision maker, that it makes any difference.
    HTH
    Mike

  • Interfaces in port-channel keep err-disabling because of keepalives

    Below is the current portchannel that I am having problems with.  The interfaces on Switch A keep going into an error disabled state because they receive their own loopback.  Cisco says to disable keepalives and that it will fix the problem, but I do not like the idea of disabling keepalives.  Has anyone found a solution other than disabling keepalives?  Notice that ios's are different, but am not convinced that this is the issue.  Also one is PoE and the other isn't.  Lastly, i found this article "Keepalives are sent on all interfaces by default in Cisco IOS Software Release 12.1EA-based software. In Cisco IOS Software Release 12.2SE-based software and later, keepalives are not sent by default on fiber and uplink interfaces".  I would think trunked interfaces in a port-channel would be uplink interfaces and if this is true, it should be sending out keepalives anyway since i am running the 12.2SE based ios.  Thanks for whatever input you may have.
    Switch A
    C3750E Boot Loader (C3750X-HBOOT-M) Version 12.2(53r)SE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    System image file is "flash:/c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE3/c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE3.bin"
    cisco WS-C3750X-48P
    Port-channels in the group:
    Port-channel: Po52
    Age of the Port-channel   = 219d:04h:32m:49s
    Logical slot/port   = 10/39          Number of ports = 4
    GC                  = 0x00000000      HotStandBy port = null
    Port state          = Port-channel Ag-Inuse
    Protocol            =    -
    Port security       = Disabled
    Ports in the Port-channel:
    Index   Load   Port     EC state        No of bits
    ------+------+------+------------------+-----------
      0     00     Gi1/0/35 On                 0
      0     00     Gi1/0/36 On                 0
      0     00     Gi2/0/45 On                 0
      0     00     Gi2/0/46 On                 0
    %ETHCNTR-3-LOOP_BACK_DETECTED: Loop-back detected on GigabitEthernet1/0/35.
    %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: loopback error detected on Gi1/0/35, putting Gi1/0/35 in err-disable state
    %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/35, changed state to down
    %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Port-channel39, changed state to down
    %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Port-channel39, changed state to down
    Switch B
    C3750E Boot Loader (C3750X-HBOOT-M) Version 12.2(53r)SE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    System image file is "flash:/c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-58.SE2/c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-58.SE2.bin"
    cisco WS-C3750X-48
    Port-channels in the group:
    Port-channel: Po52
    Age of the Port-channel   = 443d:18h:43m:06s
    Logical slot/port   = 10/39          Number of ports = 4
    GC                  = 0x00000000      HotStandBy port = null
    Port state          = Port-channel Ag-Inuse
    Protocol            =    -
    Port security       = Disabled
    Ports in the Port-channel:
    Index   Load   Port     EC state        No of bits
    ------+------+------+------------------+-----------
      0     00     Gi1/0/35 On                 0
      0     00     Gi1/0/36 On                 0
      0     00     Gi1/0/45 On                 0
      0     00     Gi1/0/46 On                 0

    PER CISCO
    Symptom:
    An interface on a Catalyst switch is errordisabled after detecting a loopback.
    Mar 7 03:20:40: %ETHCNTR-3-LOOP_BACK_DETECTED: Loop-back detected on
    GigabitEthernet0/2. The port is forced to linkdown.
    Mar 7 03:20:42: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface GigabitEthernet0/2, changed state
    to administratively down
    Mar 7 03:20:43: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
    GigabitEthernet0/2, changed state to down
    Conditions:
    This might be seen on a Catalyst 2940, 2950, 2950-LRE, 2955, 2970, 3550, 3560
    or 3750 switch running 12.1EA or 12.2SE based code.
    Workaround:
    Disable keepalives by using the no keepalive interface command. This
    will prevent the port from being errdisabled, but it does not resolve the root
    cause of the problem. Please see section below for more information.
    Additional Information:
    The problem occurs because the keepalive packet is looped back to the port that
    sent the keepalive. There is a loop in the network. Although disabling the
    keepalive will prevent the interface from being errdisabled, it will not remove
    the loop.
    The problem is aggravated if there are a large number of Topology Change
    Notifications on the network. When a switch receives a BPDU with the Topology
    Change bit set, the switch will fast age the MAC Address table. When this
    happens, the number of flooded packets increases because the MAC Address table
    is empty.

  • Port channel WLC 5508 and 3750

    Hi All,
    I want to configure Port channel for WLC 5508 and cisco 3750 Stack Switch. What changes I need to make on WLC and where?
    Thanks
    Jagdev

    Thanks Chris,
    LAG is enable on WLC, and Port channel is configured on 3750, Please see the configration and Port channel status below:-
    (Cisco Controller) >show lag summary
    LAG Enabled
    interface Port-channel14
    description Port Channel to WLC001
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport mode trunk
    end
    sh etherchannel 14 summary
    Flags:  D - down        P - bundled in port-channel
            I - stand-alone s - suspended
            H - Hot-standby (LACP only)
            R - Layer3      S - Layer2
            U - in use      f - failed to allocate aggregator
            M - not in use, minimum links not met
            u - unsuitable for bundling
            w - waiting to be aggregated
            d - default port
    Number of channel-groups in use: 14
    Number of aggregators:           14
    Group  Port-channel  Protocol    Ports
    ------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
    14     Po14(SD)        LACP      Gi1/0/22(I) Gi2/0/22(I)
    sh run int g1/0/22
    Building configuration...
    Current configuration : 209 bytes
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/22
    description Trunk to WLC001 DistPort1
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk native vlan 254
    switchport mode trunk
    channel-group 14 mode active
    end
    sh run int g2/0/22
    Building configuration...
    Current configuration : 209 bytes
    interface GigabitEthernet2/0/22
    description Trunk to WLC001 DistPort2
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk native vlan 254
    switchport mode trunk
    channel-group 14 mode active
    end

  • WLC LAG Mode and Port Channel

    So I was reading the controller best practices and got this:
    When you use LAG, the controller relies on the switch for the load balancing decisions on traffic that come from the network. It expects that traffic that belongs to an AP always enters on the same port. Use only ip-src or ip-src ip-dst load balancing options in the switch EtherChannel configuration. Some switch models might use unsupported load balancing mechanisms by default, so it is important to verify.
    This is how to verify the EtherChannel load balancing mechanism:
    switch#show etherchannel load-balance
    EtherChannel Load-Balancing Configuration:
    src-dst-ip
    EtherChannel Load-Balancing Addresses Used Per-Protocol:
    Non-IP: Source XOR Destination MAC address
    IPv4: Source XOR Destination IP address
    IPv6: Source XOR Destination IP address
    This is how to change the switch configuration (IOS):
    switch(config)#port-channel load-balance src-dst-ip
    Now Cisco switches by default will do src-mac.  If I make this change obviously this would be a global change.  I don't believe it should cause any performance issues but wanted to get some expert opinions on this.  Switches my controller will be connected to will also have two routers connected as well via Port Channel.
    I'm trying to understand the reasoning behind this.

    I've never seen that command cause any issues in any deployment I've worked on.
    HTH,
    Steve

  • Create port channel between UCS-FI and MDS 9124 (F Mode)

    Dear Team,
    We were trying to create  port channel between UCS FI and MDS 9124
    But the port channel not getting active in F mode on MDS 9124
    FI is in FC End Host Mode
    We have enabled FC uplink trunking on FI
    We have enabled NPIV on MDS
    We have enabled trunk on MDS
    FI and MDS in default VSAN
    To check we changed the FI mode to FC Switching mode and port channels became active but in E mode
    when we enabled FC uplink trunking on FI and FC Switching mode port channels became active in TE mode
    but in both the above cases showflogi database shows WWPN of SAN alone not showing any from FI.
    How to achive this?
    Have read that no need to change the swicthing mode to FC Switching mode and keep as FC Endhost mode
    SO how to achieve Port channel with F mode in MDS and FI ( Mode showing as NProxy)
    Does it has to do anything with MDS NX-OS version? (https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2179129)
    If yes how to upgrade as license for ports came along with Device and we do not have any PAC/PAK or license file as it came
    with license
    Also we have seen 2 files availabe for download (m9100-s2ek9-kickstart-mz.5.2.8b.bin and m9100-s2ek9-mz.5.2.8b.bin) which to use
    Thanks and Regards
    Jose

    Hi Jo Bo,
    what version of software if your MDS running?
    On your UCS do connect nxos and show inteface brieft and look at the mac address.
    it is possible that you might be hitting the bug below. if this is the case you might need to upgrade the firmware on your MDS.
    Add MAC OUI "002a6a", "8c604f", "00defb" for 5k/UCS-FI
    http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCty04686
    Symptom:
    Nexus switch unable to connect any other Nexus or other Cisco Switch in NPV mode with a F port-channel.   Issue might be seen in earlier 5.1 releases like
    5.1.3.N1.1a
    but not the latest
    5.1.3.N2.1c
    release. Issue is also seen in
    5.2(1)N1(1)
    and
    6.0(2)N1(1)
    and later releases.
    Conditions:
    Nexus configured for SAN PortChannels or NPIV trunking mode Nexus connected to UCS via regular F port channel where UCS in NPV mode  NPV edge switch: Port WWN OUI from UCS FI  or other Cisco manufactured switch:  xx:xx:00:2a:6a:xx:xx:xx   OR  xx:xx:8c:60:4f:xx:xx:xx
    Workaround:
    Turn-off trunking mode on Nexus 5k TF-port Issue does not happen with standard  F-PORT Remove SAN Portchannel config
    Further Problem Description:
    To verify the issue please collect  show flogi internal event-history errors  Each time the port is attempted OLS, NOS, LRR counters will increment. This can be determined via the following output,  show port internal info all show port internal event-history errors

  • WAAS Port Channel Configuration

    In the recent weeks we got some reports that CIFS writing performance to NETAPP OnTap 7.3 filer was degraded for WAAS accelerated connections.  NETAPP OnTAP 7.2  and native Microsoft filers were running fine. In our Testlab we could correlate this issue with the port channel setup on  our WAAS devices. With round robin (standard setting) the CIFS writing perforamce was poor. By switching  the port channel loadbalancing to src-dst-ip-port the performance was excellent.
    Is there any known best practices recommendation for port channel configuration on WAAS  devices?
    Many thanks in advance, Peter.

    The best practice depends on your network. Most deployments are fine with the default round robin configuration for port channel on the WAE. But I have encountered some installations where the configuration had to be changed in order to avoid out of order packets causing slow performance (like, if there is a firewall between the WAE and the server).
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

  • FC Port Channel between UCS and MDS.

    Hi All,
    I am new to Cisco Fabric Concepts. In my enviornment i have a F port channel(8 Port Group) created on MDS 9513 switch and this Fport 
    channel is connected to Cisco UCS 6296 FI. The Cisco UCS Blade servers are connected to the Fabric Interconnect .
    On MDS NPIV is enabled.
    Can anyone explain the below questions.
    1. Why do we create an F port Channel Group and connect it to the UCS FI? Is this something similar to Brocade Edge to AG Switch Connectivity.
    2. How to configure F port Channel Group in MDS . Can anyone explain with an example.
    3. Do we need to make any Configuration on UCS FI ports for server connectivity and Channel port Connectivity if yes what are the steps required to 
    do the same.Does the WWPN shows up in the FLOGI Database if the connectivity and configuration looks good in UCS FI and MDS.
    4. What happens when a VSAN on MDS switch is added to the Port Channel.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Santosh surya

    Look at my remarks in
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12468266/fc-port-channels-between-mds-and-ucs-fi-best-practice
    1. Why do we create an F port Channel Group and connect it to the UCS FI? Is this something similar to Brocade Edge to AG Switch Connectivity.
    F port channel is proprietary; therefore any such F port channel between UCS FI and Brocade doesn't work.
    2. How to configure F port Channel Group in MDS . Can anyone explain with an example.
    see eg.
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/sites/default/files/legacy/9/9/2/53299-UCS_1-4-1_F-port_channel-trunk-v1.pdf
    3. Do we need to make any Configuration on UCS FI ports for server connectivity and Channel port Connectivity if yes what are the steps required to 
    see eg.
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/sites/default/files/legacy/9/9/2/53299-UCS_1-4-1_F-port_channel-trunk-v1.pdf
    Does the WWPN shows up in the FLOGI Database if the connectivity and configuration looks good in UCS FI and MDS.
    flogi database is on the MDS, not FI; there are however UCS CLI commands, like "show npv ...."
    4. What happens when a VSAN on MDS switch is added to the Port Channel.
    If its not created on UCS, it will just not become the status "up"

  • 6880X VSS Port-Channel

    Hi
    I was trying to configure two 6800x switches as a VSS pair, Ive done this on 4500x switches before and worked a treat. when setting up a L2 port-channel, for some reason it puts the ports into routed mode and does not allow me to build a L2 port-channel.
    So I add the following config for the port-channel
    Interface port-channel 10
    Description VSL_Link
    switchport
    switch virtual link 2
    no shut
    Interface range Tengig 1/1 – 1/2
    Description VSL_Link
    switchport mode trunk
    channel-group 10 mode on
    Now as soon as I type the channel-group 10 mode on, it gives an error
    "Command rejected  (Port-channel10): Either port is L2 and port-channel is L3, or vice-versa"
    I managed to create a L2 port-channel on a 4500x, will the 6800x only allow me to create a l3 port channel. 

    Hi 
    I tried this config on the 4500x and it worked, now I have also added the switchport mode trunk command to both the port-channel and interface and still getting the same error. 
    When I do sh int status, the ports are showing as routed
    I cleared the config and first set both interface as trunks, then when I do the channel-group 10 mode on command, it accepts the command an automatically creates the port-channel, but the interfaces show as routed.
    This is my first time using a 6880x, when i logged into it, the default hostname is set to Router. I was expecting it to be named Switch, not that the hostname affects the config but makes me wonder, is the config different for the 6880x as opposed to other L3 switches

  • ASR 1006 shaping\policing on port-channel interfaces

    Hello
    I encountered a problem - ASR 1006 ignores shaping\policing configuration on a port-channel interfaces.
    If I configure:
    policy-map Shaping
     class class-default
      shape average 100000
    interface TenGigabitEthernet0/0/0
     no ip address
     channel-group 1 mode active
    interface Port-channel1.10
     encapsulation dot1Q 10
     ip address 1.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
     service-policy output Shaping
    With such configuration shaping doesn't work. But it works on ordinary tenGigabit interfaces...
    I've tried several ios xe versions.. no changes
    Are there any ristrictions with shaping on Port-channel interfaces?

    Hi,
    Traditional QoS will not work for etherchannels. Please read to find suitable config for your case.
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/qos_mqc/configuration/xe-3s/qos-mqc-xe-3s-book/qos-eth-int.html#GUID-6137A7B8-B2D1-4024-8AC9-E7EBEDD868C6

  • Policy maps on port-channel sub-interfaces

    We're trying to implement an enterprise QoS policy and I'm wondering how we can apply our QoS policy maps to several different sub-interfaces on a port-channel. In our case, we have both LAN and WAN connections that connect as VLANs on a switch and terminate as sub-interfaces on a port-channel that combines two Gigabit Ethernet interfaces on our router. The LAN connection will need to have a ingress service-policy to classify traffic as it comes from a customer LAN, and the WAN connections will have to have an egress service-policy to place the traffic classes into LLQ and CBWFQ queues as it leaves the router. Could I put both the ingress and egress service-policies on the physical router interface, or should I put them on the port-channel interface? Or should I apply them to the individual sub-interfaces? For example, I could put the ingress classification service-policy on the LAN sub-interface connection.
    Any thoughts or insight would be helpful. Thanks.

    I can't put it as input because :
    gw-a(config-subif)#service-policy input policy_upload                     
    Traffic Shaping feature not supported in input policy.
    Here's a show during a bandwidth test. You can see the offered rate is properly measured and is _way_ above the target shape rate.
    gw-a#show policy-map interface Port-channel 1.2
    Port-channel1.2
      Service-policy output: policy_upload
        Class-map: class-default (match-any)
          624006 packets, 842239036 bytes
          5 minute offered rate 12774000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
          Match: any
          Queueing
          queue limit 64 packets
          (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
          (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
          shape (average) cir 100000, bc 400, be 400
          target shape rate 100000

  • "The `Inline' mode also supports `Port-Channel'" ?

    Referring to this document:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns517/ns224/ns377/deployment_guide_c07-490578.html
    it states:
    "The `Inline' mode also supports `Port-Channel', which enables load-balancing and `high-availability' should one of the physical link fails"
    is this true? I have a WAVE-474 which comes with 1 onboard port and 2 inline ports. Can you configure those 2 inline ports in a port channel and then use it with WCCP? I don't believe you can. Not sure what the document is referring too.
    I also have WAVE-574's and that one can do port-channel using two onboard GIG interfaces + WCCP.

    Hi Roman,
    Your judgement was right. You can not configure inline interface in a port channel configuraiton.
    Here is the output from wae-612 running 4.1.5c . You will see that there is no option for port channel / channel-group with inline interface.
    WAE612-3(config)#int inlineGroup ?
      <1-4>/  Slot number
    WAE612-3(config)#int inlineGroup 1/0
    WAE612-3(config-if)#?
      autosense      Interface autosense
      bandwidth      Interface bandwidth
      encapsulation  Set encapsulation type for an interface
      exit           Exit from this submode
      failover       Modify failover parameters
      full-duplex    Interface fullduplex
      half-duplex    Interface halfduplex
      inline         VLAN's to intercept
      ip             Interface Internet Protocol Config commands
      no             Negate a command or set its defaults
      shutdown       Put the inline interface in passthrough mode
    WAE612-3(config-if)#exit
    WAE612-3(config)#int g 1/0
    WAE612-3(config-if)#?
      autosense      Interface autosense
      bandwidth      Interface bandwidth
      cdp            Cisco Discovery Protocol Interface Config commands
      channel-group  Configure EtherChannel group
      description    Interface specific description
      exit           Exit from this submode
      full-duplex    Interface fullduplex
      half-duplex    Interface halfduplex
      ip             Interface Internet Protocol Config commands
      mtu            Set the interface Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU)
      no             Negate a command or set its defaults
      shutdown       Shutdown the specific interface
      standby        Standby interface config commands
    WAE612-3(config-if)#
    Hope this helps.
    Regards.

  • IOS to NXOS VPC PORT CHANNEL

    Hello
    I have a pair of Nexus 5K's in a VPC domain and some 2960's as VPC members, with a port channel to the domain.
    Topology is as follows:
    5K1 and 5K2 in VPC domain
    VPC from 5K1 and 5K2 to 2960
    2960 has gi0/1 and gi0/2 in 1 port channel
    gi0/1 to 5k1, gi0/2 to 5k2
    I know that what I am going to ask may be totally against the purpose of VPC, but, I am looking for a way to favour gi0/1 for traffic, rather than load balancing over gi0/1 and gi0/2. The reaon for this is that I would like to benefit from the lack of loop that VPC provides, but would also like to have a primary and secondary link as the majority of traffic should actually go via 5K1, rather than 5K2.
    Any suggestions welcome.
    Many thanks in advance
    Anthony

    Hi Anthony,
    The Cisco NX-OS software load balances traffic across all operational interfaces in a portchannel by hashing the addresses in the frame to a numerical value that selects one of the links in the channel. Port channels provide load balancing by default. Port-channel load-balancing uses MAC addresses, IP addresses, or Layer 4 port numbers to select the link. Port-channel load balancing uses either source or destination addresses or ports, or both source and destination addresses or ports.
    You can configure the load-balancing mode to apply to all port channels that are configured on the entire device or on specified modules. The per-module configuration takes precedence over the load-balancing configuration for the entire device. You can configure one load-balancing mode for the entire device, a different mode for specified
    modules, and another mode for the other specified modules. You cannot configure the load-balancing method per port channel.
    You can configure the type of load-balancing algorithm used. You can choose the load-balancing algorithm that determines which member port to select for egress traffic by looking at the fields in the frame.
    Note:  The default load-balancing mode for Layer 3 interfaces is the source and destination IP address, and the default load-balancing mode for non-IP interfaces is the source and destination MAC address.
    From the config mode you can try different load-balacing method ,
    port-channel load-balance {dest-ip-port | dest-ip-port-vlan |
    destination-ip-vlan | destination-mac | destination-port | source-dest-ip-port | source-dest-ip-port-vlan | source-dest-ip-vlan | source-dest-mac | source-dest-port | source-ip-port | source-ip-port-vlan | source-ip-vlan | source-mac | source-port} [module-number]
    To Summarize: I cannot say which port would be selected, it purely depends on type of frame you are sending with the combination of the load-balance method.
    After tweaking you can also know from the command which link the traffic is taking,
    NEXUS2-SPAN# show port-channel load-balance forwarding-path interface port-channel 71 src-ip 1.1.1.1 dst-ip 2.2.2.2 vlan 51 module 2
    Module 2: Missing params will be substituted by 0's.
    Load-balance Algorithm: src-dst ip-l4port
    RBH: 0xb0       Outgoing port id: Ethernet8/8
    we can also try tweaking the same load-balancing on the 2960 also. It purely depends on the load-balancing algorithm. Below is for 2960 Load-balancing tweaking,
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst2960/software/release/12.2_53_se/configuration/guide/swethchl.html
    Even after doing this i wouldnt say 100% it would select one link.
    Hope this helps!
    Thanks,
    Richard.
    *Rate if this is useful

  • Fabric Interconnect Uplink port channeling...

    Hi,
    We setup port channel of two 10G uplink interfaces on each Fabric Interconnect. Everything is running as expected.
    However we noticed that under 'Port-Channel # (Fabric #)' setting on LAN tap, 'Admin Speed' was set to '10Gbps'.
    Should we leave this configuration as is or match to the maximum bandwidth of port Channel we set up (20Gbps)?
    I only see four options on each port channel configuration, 1 Gbps, 10Gbps, 20Gbps and 40Gbps so I'm not sure if we should change this setting.
    Thank you                   

    Hello,
    You do not need to change the speed ( admin ). 20 Gbps configuration is applicable for certain server models.
    --------  NXOS output -----------------
    FI-A(nxos)# sh run int port-channel 1
    interface port-channel1
      description U: Uplink
      switchport mode trunk
      speed 10000
    FI-A(nxos)# show int port-channel 1
    port-channel1 is up
      Hardware: Port-Channel, address: 547f.ee67.e0fb (bia 547f.ee67.e0fb)
      Description: U: Uplink
      MTU 1500 bytes, BW 20000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
         reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
      Encapsulation ARPA
      Port mode is trunk
      full-duplex, 10 Gb/s
    FI-A(nxos)# sh int bri
    Port-channel VLAN  Type Mode   Status  Reason                    Speed  Protocol
    Interface                                                               
    Po1          1     eth  trunk  up      none                       a-10G(D)  lacp
    There is cosmetic defect where we list the operational speed as 10 Gbps instead of 20Gbps
    FI-A /eth-uplink/fabric # show port-channel detail
    Port Channel:
        Port Channel Id: 1
        Name: FIA
        Admin State: Enabled
        Oper State: Up
       Speed: 10 Gbps
        Oper Speed: 10 Gbps
        State Reason:
        flow control policy: default
    HTH
    Padma

  • 3750X Port-Channel Load-Blanace method

    I have a 3750X and I'm wondering what would be the best Port-Channel Load-Balancing method would be for my network.
    switch(config)#port load ?
      dst-ip       Dst IP Addr
      dst-mac      Dst Mac Addr
      src-dst-ip   Src XOR Dst IP Addr
      src-dst-mac  Src XOR Dst Mac Addr
      src-ip       Src IP Addr
      src-mac      Src Mac Addr
    We have a few Layer 3 VLANs: Default, Servers, Clients, and Guests.
    Some of our servers are LACP bundled.
    So it would be mainly clients on the one layer 3 VLAN accessing the server on the other layer 3 VLAN.
    We also have a few smaller switches that are trunked and LACP bundled back to the core 3750X.
    Can anyone suggest which Load-Balancing method would be best for our situation?
    Thanks!

    The default load balancing method on the 3750 series is based on source-MAC address.  This usually works fine in most cases. If you change it to something different than this, it will affect all your port-channels in that switch.
    HTH

Maybe you are looking for

  • Problem in Tcode VKOA

    Hi guru's, while i am executing T-code VKOA and selecting table 1. i got a Syntaxerror  like. An exception occurred that is explained in detail below. The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_PROGRAM_NOT_FOUND', was not   caught in procedure

  • Z87-G45 and SOME USB 3.0 ports not appearing in tray/prompting to eject

    The 2 lowest USB 3.0 ports on the back panel (Nearest the sound connectors) of my G45 have a weird issue under Win 7 Ultimate. When I plug in a 2.0 drive into those ports, everything is normal i.e. the eject icon and eject warning appear in the tray

  • VAT Tax report S_ALR_87012357

    Hi SAP Guru's I am running Report S_ALR_87012357 for VAT Tax report, but the report is displaying the Tax base amount twice on the report. I have observed that, if there is more then one tax code used in the document level (exp: V0, V1) then its disp

  • Keyword replacement

    I would like some keyword replacement feauture. Where I should be able to specify what to be replaced with what. Lets say I give Bridge a txt file with the format like this player14 Niklas Andersson Then in the keywords and description as well if I e

  • Numbers - Can't paste hyperlink into written-in cell

    Hi, When trying to paste a website link into a cell with writing in, all other text is deleted from the cell, and only the link remains. I am already double-clicking on the cell and making sure my cursor appears, so the paste should not be overriding