Gamma problems

Hi there . . . . .
When I export stuff from AE in most formats (H.264, MPEG4 etc) the render is pale, washed out and much lighter than my AE project.
I know there is a gamma issue with H.264 and quicktime, but MPEG4 (in a Quicktime wrapper) now also seems to suffer the same problem, whereas it didn't pre-Snow Leopard ?
Anyone got any clues as to the root of the mismatch between AE and Quicktime player ?
P.S. If I render out as ProRes the problem disappears ?
Cheers
Lee.

Thanks for putting in hours of time, this whole area is a pain. I need to point out that while I understand the technical issues, the guy who knows the practical issues is out due to a family emergency so I will be a poor balm.
Where to start?
After Effects uses RGB internally to represent color. Using the export menu has Quicktime drive the whole export process, which includes having quicktime call back into AE to render an RGB frame for quicktime to go compress. When using the render queue, AE is master, it renders a frame and then pushes it to quicktime. When we do the pushing, we get the opportunity to set some setting that sometimes help with gamma and color shifts. I'll call out what we do in the render queue path that we can't do in the Export menu path due to the underlying architecture.
The problem with gamma and color shift almost exclusively occurs with Codecs that run in YCrCb. This includes all ProRes (I'm lumping in ProRes 4444 even though it can do RGBA) and even PhotoJPEG if you aren't at highest quality (I think above 75%). These codecs are often defined to be in either the Rec601 or Rec709 color space (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rec._709). My guess is PhotoJPEG is sRGB, but that is a wild guess. Quicktime makes certain assumptions about the RGB color buffers it gets. These assumptions are different in Snow Leopard, Leopard, and Windows.
Since the codec is expecting color to be represented a certain way, the assumptions and associated color conversions when going from RGB to YCrCb is where things go awry.
By default Quicktime assumes RGB buffers are in a monitor color space. I believe this means sRGB (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRGB) with a 1.8 gamma on Leopard (technically not sRGB, but what can you do), sRGB with 2.2 on Leopard, and sRGB with 2.2 on Windows. Since Rec709 and sRGB have the same color primaries, any incorrect assumptions here only appear as brightness/gamma changes.
The idealized black box export path for the Export Menu is:
AE->RGB (untagged)---Color Conversion in Quicktime--->YCrCb--->compressor.
In CS4 (maybe CS3?) we added the ability to tag the RGB buffer with the gamma. AE also will request RGB frames from Quicktime with the GAMA tag applied when importing. This is controlled with the "Legacy Quicktime Gamma" preference. I believe the export half of this will only affect the Render Queue and not the Export menu.
The intent behind using the gama tag was to make the RGB to YCrCb conversion more predictable. Alas, the tag ends up in the resultant movie and can influence other consumers of the file (like FCP). Further confounding things. This is why we added the Legacy Quicktime Gamma checkbox, we could not make every single test workflow work. The Legacy workflow does not add the tag.
Lastly, not only does each product on the market talk to Quicktime differently (i.e. some use RGB, some use YCrCb buffers directly, some obey the gama tag for color conversions, some don't), but some codecs themselves implement color conversions. Also, some 3rd party codecs install their own color conversion routines that compete with the Apple defined ones and will cause different RGB to YCrCb conversions even when NOT using their codec. Also, Quicktime makes different guesses based on which OS you are running.
Since a couple of ProRes codecs were shipped after CS4, they don't work correctly out of the box. They need some custom settings (http://blogs.adobe.com/toddkopriva/2009/12/prores-4444-colors-and-gamma-s.html).
Also, pixel dimension will also affect the color conversions as some codec use non-HD stuff as Rec601, not Rec709 which leads to another source of shifts.
In the end the RGB to YCrCb color conversions are influenced by:
1) Your export path (Export Menu, vs Render Queue)
2) The operating system you are running
3) Which codecs are installed on the system (even if you aren't using them)
4) The setting of the Legacy Quicktime Gamma Setting
5) The particular destination application.
6) The pixel dimension of the footage.
I also feel the need to point out that while ProRes may be in Rec709 (which nominally has a gamma of 2.2), Final Cut Pro will correctly convert YCrCb Rec709 to Monitor RGB (Gamma of 1.8 on Pre Snow Leopard) for display. By default After Effects does no display color correction. When importing a file that starts in YCrCb Rec709 we convert it to RGB Rec709 (Gamma 2.2) if AE does the decoding. This means something like a DV file will look different in AE and FCP on a mac with 1.8 display gamma. If you use an external preview device, I do not believe you will see any difference, but things will look different on the mac monitor.
I'm hungry enough now that I'm just going to make more errors than I already have.
I hope this helps someone.
--chris

Similar Messages

  • PREMIERE PRO CS5.5 Gamma problem while exporting project to mjpeg A or B

    Dear Sir,
    I'm in a big ****. I've directed and edited 1h documentary for Finnish television, also, the technical specs requested by the TV Channel is all production Broadcast masters must be encoded with Apple ProRES codec or MJPEG A or B.
    As i'm working on PC (win7), the ProRES codec doesn't exist on PC system, so i've done the export to MJPEG. The problem is i have a different gamma level when i watch the final export with Quicktime or VLC. Of course i can adjust the level in those players, but it doesnt effect the file. When i import the Qt file into a Premiere sequence, the gamma level is still **** and different from my original level i have from my timeline and preview window. If i export the project to H264 1920x1080p25, then the gamma is perfect with Qt, VLC and WinMedia player. But the TV station don't wanna work with H264. Deadline is on next monday, and i can't send a Qt MJPEG file with wrong gamma !!!Any chance to find a solution to fix it ??? After reading different forum, i can see this problem exist since many years and never been solved.
    What can i do ??
    Denis.

    Things is my prpject includ few effect plugins i bought, so what ever i could find a mac, not your i could export xml project to finalcut with plugins it dont have
    Denis
    Sent from my iPad.
    Le 31 mai 2013 à 15:20, Fuzzy Barsik <[email protected]> a écrit :
    Re: PREMIERE PRO CS5.5 Gamma problem while exporting project to mjpeg A or B
    created by Fuzzy Barsik in Premiere Pro - View the full discussion
    If it were me, I wouldn't encode to MJPEG.
    So as to encode to ProRes on Windows you can utilise any solution based on ffmpeg/ffmbc or better yet find a Mac with Final Cut or Compressor installed for delivering critical work.
    Please note that the Adobe Forums do not accept email attachments. If you want to embed a screen image in your message please visit the thread in the forum to embed the image at http://forums.adobe.com/message/5368019#5368019
    Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page: http://forums.adobe.com/message/5368019#5368019
    To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at http://forums.adobe.com/message/5368019#5368019. In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
    Start a new discussion in Premiere Pro by email or at Adobe Community
    For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to http://forums.adobe.com/message/2936746#2936746.

  • H264 Gamma Problems, now F4V's are dead

    Hi, Now Adobe have killed off F4V's - the only reliable way of making movies with decent colour that I found.
    Does anyone know of another codec that will produce great colour in Windows?
    Or does anyone know how to correct the old Windows Gamma problem in h264?
    Thanks!

    Hi,  I really thought it was pretty well known? Hmm. Well, so far as I know, it's a Windows/Apple thing. If you use AFX to make h264 movies on a mac it works great, but on Windows it results in a grey washed out qt. If you then played that movie on a mac it would appear fine. Very annoying, it's been like that for years, apparently it's all down to Apple not giving a stuff. Unless it's been fixed in the last 6 months. So f4v's were my best option for showing clients stuff. But if you know anything I don't (very likely) I'm all ears...
    Thanks
    Oliver

  • AE CC and the Rest of Adobe Apps - ProRes Quicktime Render Gamma Problem Back AGAIN

    Hi ---
    With this version I am back to square one with AE NOT being able to render out correct gamma exporting to PR4444 -
    Scenario (And this matter NOT whether I use Color Management or Not)
    1) I open a Clip in AE or PPRO (In this case a TIFF Sequence RAW'ed from Lightroom)
    2) I switch back and forth between Lightroom and AE and the images are identical in color and gamma
    3) I export to PR4444 and open in Quicktime Player or FCPx and the Gamma is off.
    4) If I re-import the exported file into AE - AE reads the file with a diff. gamma and the result appears to be identical with source
    But it is no good that the result only looks the way it was intended in AE ! --- The poeople on the web are not viewing the movie in AE but with other players.
    If i open that same tiff sequence in the quicktime player pro and export to PR4444 the results are 100% identical.
    I find it highly frustrating that a company so higly regarded with so amazing software is NOT able to render out an image correctly...
    This problem has been around since forever and I find it higly disturbing that this issue has not yet been addressed.
    As of now I have no choice that to ditch AE and PPRO.... I WANT the images I work with to look the way they do in the app while color grading... What point is there in CG'ing images to perfection
    if adobe cant even render out the results....
    As I stated it does NOT matter whether I am color managing or not... Results are lighter in gamma when viewed in anything else than AE or PPRO !!!!!!
    The amount to correct back is approx. a gamma of 0.9
    BTW --- When in 32 bit how come I cannot set a gamma of 0.905 why is the gamma limited to two digits after the comma... 32 bit has MUCH more to offer !!!!

    Thanks Todd,
    I have tried those tips before. Unfortunately, I haven't had great success with them in this case.
    When I reserve the 16GB of RAM for other apps and RAM preview a comp containing multiple Prores 4444 footage layers, it plays back and retains the cache as expected. However, the 2nd RAM preview of another comp in the same project containing multiple Prores 4444 footage layers stays stuck in "Initializing Background Processes." A check with Activity Monitor usually shows aeselflink processes that are hung up.
    This has been my experience until I came upon the work-around of precomping Prores files.
    To demonstrate, here's a screen shot of the stuck process with the memory settings I used -
    I rebooted the system and tried 2 more times with the same result.
    If I simply precomp the Prores 4444 footage layers as demonstrated in the video, I get smooth RAM preview caching and performance. This works even if I allocated less RAM to other applications in the Memory and Multiprocessing preferences (hence the 6GB setting from earlier). With the work-around, AE runs smooth with no hiccups and RAM previews behave as expected.

  • QT Gamma problem....

    I seem to recall some sort of fix for the QT Gamma bug. Adding a file, or opening a file, or some weird deal. Can anyone clarify a fix for this annoying problem? Or send me in the right direction?
    I thought this was resolved, but I have just lowered the saturation and color corrected a clip in Final Cut and after exporting a reference movie, the resulting file looks nothing like it did in FC... it's too light and too desaturated. At this point I cannot continue until I figure out a solution.
    Thanks

    I seem to recall some sort of fix for the QT Gamma bug.
    Are you referring to the switch to a 2.2 default under Snow Leopard? Your profile indicates you are still using Leopard, but just in case here is article on the switch from default 1.8 to 2.2: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3712

  • Dark image or loss of gamma problem

    Hello All,
     I have a MSI Gforce FX 5200 Personal cinema with a very strage problem. When the card is installed the image is very dark, this orccurs on boot up with my Vivid Bios from Aopen. I have tried changing the gamma within the program but it still to dark to see, ( i even have problems seeing the bios). I have not overclocked the unit as I have no cooling setup yet so I don't think this is a problem there. I have noticed that on the back of the board in the top left hand corner (connector strip/panel to the right , GPu on the other side) the is a small chip that is very hot. i did not notice this problem straight away as I had just connected my new monitor and though it may be that, i have since tried five different monitors and no change.
    can any one help or have you seen this problem. I am assuming it may be a problem at the DAC side. To add to my problem i had this board imported from the EU by a friend and I no longer have a reciept so I cannot return it to the supplier even if I knew who they were. Does anybody know is MSI would replace this unit directly?
    Many Thank all
    Colin

    I think MSI will change it but try to phone MSI  first.

  • Gamma Problem

    I have a number of raw images from a Canon 20D. I'm running on the built in display on a MBP, which has been calibrated to a gamma of 2.2 (using the eyeball method--I don't have a hardware calibration device.) I'm running Aperture 1.5.
    When I export versions that look fine on this display, to JPGs with sRGB, they still look very dark and contrasty on a windows box. That is, exactly what I would have expected if my mac was calibrated to 1.8.
    The exports look great on the mac using preview, safari, and firefox.
    Any thoughts on what I am doing wrong? Is the gamma setting unreliable in when you manually calibrate? (I expect everything else to be off, but the gamma seemed pretty cut and dried during the calibration process.)

    Any thoughts on what I am doing wrong? Is the gamma
    setting unreliable in when you manually calibrate? (I
    expect everything else to be off, but the gamma
    seemed pretty cut and dried during the calibration
    process.)
    Have you viewed the image on one Windows computer or more? If only one then the problem could be the other computer.
    The only way to know for sure is get a hardware calibration device and run it on your MBP. The other thing you can do is check the image/s on another mac or to hook up an external monitor to your MBP and calibrate that. As good as a MBP screen is it's still a laptop and not as good as a regular display.

  • H.264 Gamma Problems with Firefox & Opera?

    I've encoded some video (from a ProRes 4x4 source in compressor) using the x.264 codec.
    When I view the x.264 file in Quicktime X, Quicktime 7, or VLC it looks fine.
    When I view the x.264 file online using Safari and Google Chrome (also Firefox and IE on a PC) it looks fine.
    BUT... when I view the file using Firefox or Opera for Mac, the file looks much darker.
    Is there a reason the file looks darker in Firefox on the Mac then elsewhere? (Something that quicktime within that browser is reading wrong) And is there a fix?
    (FYI - I'm running Snow Leopard 10.6.4)
    Thanks

    Harm Millaard wrote:
    Calibrating your displays with an Elite Spyder3 or similar is very worthwhile,
    Of course. And mine is calibrated.
    I was just trying to take an extreme example to illustrate the fact that even though Jim Simon is only describing a reality, it does not mean that a good and consistent result (not necessary ideal) cannot be achieved otherwise, with less equipment. 
    Harm Millaard wrote:
    but can't match an external monitor.
    That part I don't understand though.
    Is it not in contradiction with the first part of your sentence ? Why ?
    Harm Millaard wrote:
    Everything played with QuiRcktime on a PC shows a gamma shift. They have earned this name.  VLC does not and shows the same picture as PR.
    How does one grade his colors on FCPX then if it displays exactly what QTX displays (which is brighter and less saturated than VLC) ?
    Yeah I know, we're going in circles here ... but I would really love to find some kind of solution to this.

  • First time dealing with Greenshift/Gamma problem in Quicktime/Safari

    I've been editing video on a Mac and in Final Cut Pro since version 2  (I am transitioning to Adobe Premiere Pro so don't judge )and this is the first time I've had a huge problem with a shift in color from what I see on the canvas to what is exported - and the first time I've noticed that that problem/shift only happens when the footage is viewed in an Apple program (Quicktime or Safari when uploaded to Vimeo). Opening the footage in VLC or viewing the upload on Firefox? Looks gorgeous. But on Safari or Quicktime? Colors are muted and have a greenish cast.
    In doing some research, especially on various Adobe forums, I've learned that this is a scarily widespread problem (and learned the term 'QuiRktime') so I'm suprised I haven't had this problem before - it may be due to the lovely taupe/grey outfits, skin tones, etc that I got to shoot.
    The footage is for website/computer usage so looking at it on my monitor should be a good indicator. And I've had others look at the Vimeo upload and some have commented on the green cast (so are probably Mac people too...).
    So I'm not sure what to do - how best to give it to the client.
    Workflow: footage is ProRes HQ, shot in 1080, shrunk to 720 to make 'artificial second cam close-up' (don't ask...). Edited in Final Cut Pro, but I've been going back and forth with it in Adobe Premiere Pro to try and tweak the picture color and contrast, as I've been liking the filters in Premiere better than FCP lately, but had some pre-built items I needed to use in FCP as I haven't gotten around to re-building replacements in After Effects.
    I've exported it as ProRes and used Adobe Media Encoder to compress (been using both the Vimeo 720 preset - and tried upping the bitrate, setting quality to max rendering - and the Broadcast 720 preset).
    Only time I've gotten it to look good when opening on Quicktime is when I export it as Animation versus ProRes, but the resulting file is 12X (and thus 12GB) so too large to upload or burn on disc (and compressing it for web usage from that file gives identical results to simply compressing the ProRes file in the first place or exporting directly from Premiere Pro to h.264)
    So my question is...what is the best way to export this footage to get the right color cast in Quicktime based computers and non-Quicktime using computers.
    I've uploaded a screenshot of the footage opened in Safari and Quicktime (left side) and Firefox and VLC (right side) to Flikr
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/44843717@N04/8300689101/
    Thanks for any help  you can give

    The footage is for website/computer usage so looking at it on my monitor should be a good indicator.
    It actually doesn't matter where the footage will end up.  The idea is to see the image accurately while grading, and for that you will need a calibrated, external TV.  You just can't use a normal computer monitor or software media players for this.

  • FCP Display Gamma Problem (Everything Dark)

    I recently let system update do it's thing and went from 10.6.4 to 10.6.6 including updating pro-apps (FCS 3).
    Suddenly FCP, DVDSP, & Motion show all of my video files extremely dark (STP & Color are show them fine).
    It's as if the gamma those programs are using to display the image has changed. (Quicktime & other non-Apple apps show it fine).
    I've messed with FCS Maintenance Pack, and also used FCS Remover to remove and re-install, but that hasn't fixed the issue.
    I'm sure there is a setting, or corrupted file somewhere that's causing video to be displayed wrong, but I'm not sure where to look, what to change at this point.
    Any help, thoughts, ideas? Thanks in advance.

    Not familiar with FCE. Did you try the other advice offered in this thread and go to the Apple Menu > System Preferences and click on the Displays Icon.
    When that opens click on the Color Tab.
    Verify that your setting is correct for your display.
    Also, what are the properties of your source video?
    MtD
    Message was edited by: Meg The Dog to fix typo

  • Brightness/Gamma problem

    I've noticed that a movie in Quicktime 7 pro looks brighter than the same movie viewed inside Final Cut Pro and After Effects. Anyone know what this is?
    G5 dual 2g   Mac OS X (10.4.6)  

    The MPEG-4 exports should automatically adjust to the gamma settings of the viewing machine. This prevents a file created on a Mac from appearing too dark on a PC. Older codecs don't support auto gamma correction.
    You may get a better answer in the Final Cut Discussion pages. I don't own FCP.

  • Quicktime Gamma problem when applying fliters

    Any help would be greatly appreciated:
    When I add a video filter to a quicktime movie in final cut, the image will get significantly darker.
    Thanks in advance!

    Hmmmmm.... Graeme says that PhotoJPEG at 75% or less is a YUV format (I'm not so sure) but try switching to YUV and see what happens. Wait - before that is it a color shift you notice when playing or when at rest?
    In otherwords, I often notice a different coloration in pause that shifts when playing.
    Patrick

  • QT bightness/gamma problem

    I've noticed that a DV file in Quicktime 7 pro player looks brighter than the same movie viewed inside Final Cut Pro and After Effects. Anyone know what this is?

    Hmm... I know that Quicktime handles DV footage slightly different than Final Cut Pro. For starters, it may by default deinterlace your DV clip.. which is why it may look "dirtier" than in FCP. Or it may just be playing it not at full quality. This may or may not be the reason for the brightness level.
    You can try going into the "Show Movie Properties" which is located under the "Window" Menu Then select the Video Track and go to "Visual Settings" there oyu can uncheck/check the deinterlace option and also make sure quicktime is playing at "high quality"
    There are other settings you can tweak there as well that may help you get a similar playback as FCP.
    Regardless, you should use Final Cut Pro (with a broadcast monitor preferably) as a guide to understand the actual quality of your video. (as opposed to using quicktime player).

  • Adobe Gamma problem - turned off video card

    A friend (HA!) was color balancing the monitor and accidentally hit the button to turn off the video card - Now the screen is blank. Anyone know how to turn it back on when you can't see the screen? Runnng Windows XP home edition

    I've never seen any evidence that Photoshop will remote OpenGL operations across an RDP link.
    What functionality does a program like the RealTek OpenGL Extensions Viewer report is available to the remote session?  The Microsoft software OpenGL (1.1) maybe?
    -Noel

  • Momentary gamma shifts in PS-CS6 composed image h.264 video

    Before I finalize a bug report, wonder what others are seeing?
    Having discovered the problem in a more complex scenario, I've narrowed down to a simple set of jpg images placed sequentially in a video group, and exported as an h.264 video from Photoshop PS6. All is on Windows 7 Professional SP1, all software involved completely up-to-date.
    I first noticed the gamma shift using the 'High Quality' preset. It occurs with variations on Vimeo 29.97 and Youtube 29.97 presets. The gamma problem does not occur on HD 720p or 1080p 29.97 presets.
    When I view the resulting video through Quicktime, I see a gamma shift for a moment on the first image, making it look washed out. After another moment, the gamma goes back to normal. On other players such as Windows Media or VLC, no such shift is visible.
    Interestingly, the shift comes at 1 second when exporting to the Vimeo 29.97 preset, or 'High Quality', while at 3 seconds on Youtube 29.97. Similarly, the shift back occurs at 2 seconds, or 6 seconds for Youtube.
    What the gamma shift looks like sounds like the now age-old Apple Quicktime fault on h.264. -- except it occurs only for one or a few seconds, then reverts to proper gamma, instead of continuing..
    With the simple setup of single image (jpg) sequence, it occurs only on the first image. With a more complex scenario, some actual videos included, I've seen it occur on every jpg -- or on some -- in a sequence.
    This is very repeatable here - 100%. Anyone else who's noticed it? I'm on the CS6 trial, and still thinking whether to purchase, or go on the Creative Cloud.
    Regards,
    Clive

    We're seeing a worse issue when exporting in H.264 and playing in QuickTime 10.0 (Mac OS 10.6).  We are using a custom size video to fit a spot on our website (398x498).  When exported and played in QuickTime 10.0 the white inverts throughout the video (back and forth).  The same issue is not seen when viewed in VLC or QuickTime 10.1.
    This is how the video should look:
    And this is how they are appearing:
    But like I said, the issue is very specific to QuickTime 10.0 on Mac 10.6.  VLC, Flash, Chrome, FireFox all play it correctly.

Maybe you are looking for