GAU2 Condition caluculation

Hi Experts
In Purchasing Pricing procedure, I am using the condition type GAU2 (Actual price) for procurement of price sensitive precious metals.
Could any one advise how this price is being calculated after the goods receipt is being posted.
I am using PB00 (std price)
Condition: GAU1 (Statitical -as expected price) - info record
Condition: GAU2 (pricing condition) - MEK1,
Thanks in advance
MM
Edited by: SAP-MM1 on Sep 12, 2011 2:36 PM

hi
plz check ur pricing procedure
against the condition ru given the requiremnet 031
plz check it if it is there remove and try
regards
kunal

Similar Messages

Implement pricing conditions GAU1 and GAU2

Dear All,
I want to implement pricing procedure for precious metals.
Anyone who has implemeneted the procedure at their end please guide me towards the same .
In PO I am getting following error in condition type GAU1 Inactive status as "X" and message as " Inactive via formulae of incorrect "
Please help
Thanks
Garima

Actually i haven't worked on metal prices...but once i had faced same type of error in my freight condition types...SAP responded with some solutions which i am posting...please see whether these are useful or not:
(1) Condition row is inactive
The condition type (group condition or item condition) is listed with or without a pricing result in the condition row on the condition screen for the subitem. However, the condition value is ignored. On the condition details screen (double-click on the condition row), an indicator is set for 'Inactive'.
(1.1) Inactive indicator 'A condition exclusion item'
You have selected an exclusion procedure at subitem level for your freight cost price determination schema. The condition type with inactive status 'A' was excluded using this procedure in favor of another condition type (set as inactive).
Check: In favor of which condition type or condition exclusion group was the condition type in question excluded?
=> Use Customizing transaction T_32 to determine the condition exclusion group to which the relevant condition type was assigned and use Customizing transaction TOK8 to determine the exclusion procedure assigned to the price determination schema.
(1.2) 'K - Inactive due to calculation basis/shipping material type'
An automatically determined or manually created condition type is set as inactive (inactive indicator 'K'), even though a valid condition record was found according to the analysis.
Check 1: Do all handling units in the subitems belong to a 'material group for packaging materials' that is assigned to this particular packaging material type in Customizing? The calculation base of the condition type refers to handling units (calculation bases C, E or F) and, in Customizing (transaction T_06), a packaging material type (synonym: shipping material type field T685A-VHART) was specified for the condition type?
=> Material numbers are assigned to 'material groups for packaging materials' in the material master (transaction MM02). 'Material groups for packaging materials' are assigned to packaging material types in Customizing: Transaction VHZU or IMG -> Logistics General -> Handling Unit Management -> Basics -> Define Allowed Packaging Materials
Check 2: Was a valid condition record for this condition type found in all subitems for the calculation base used?
=> Extend the condition pricing data (transaction TK11) so that valid condition records can be found for all subitems. If necessary, use a price 0.
Check 3: Was the condition type only created manually for individual subitems?
=> Usually, manual conditions must be created for the calculation base in all subitems, with the value 0 if necessary. If changes were also permitted at header level for an item condition (in Customizing transaction T_06), you can automatically create identical entries in all subitems of the calculation base by creating the condition at header level. You can then adjust these templates (with the value 0 if required) at subitem level.
Notes: For background information and options for 'Inactive K', see also note 318775. For the system response in the case of manual changes to freight conditions, see consulting note 773038.
(1.3) Inactive 'L - Condition exclusion header or inactive at header level'
The condition type could not be evaluated as a group condition or was excluded as part of a header exclusion because of another condition type.
Check 1: Could the condition group be evaluated at all?
=> On the condition screen of the header conditions (enter '=kkon' in the command field), check whether different subgroups have been created for the condition type. If this is the case, several condition rows will be displayed for the same condition type. Also check the Check the scale input values in the individual condition display (double-click on the condition row).
Since neither the price determination analysis nor the condition record display is available at header level, you must check the price table for the condition type using a subitem: Is there also a valid scale level for each scale input value? The lowest scale level is often missing in from-scales and the highest conceivable scale level is often missing in to-scales. For example, a to-scale of 'to 30 TO' cannot evaluate any shipments with 31 tons. You therefore need to extend this scale to 'to 99999 TO'.
Check 2: Did you select an exclusion procedure for your freight cost price determination schema at header level?
=> Use Customizing transaction TOK8 to check whether the indicator 'A - header exclusion' was entered in the relevant column for the exclusion procedure that is assigned to the price determination schema. If this is the case, the group condition inactive status 'L' may have been excluded in favor of another group condition type using this exclusion (set as inactive).
Use Customizing transaction T_32 to determine the condition exclusion group to which the condition type in question was assigned and use Customizing transaction TOK8 to determine the condition type or condition exclusion group in favor of which the group condition type in question could have been excluded.
Check 3: Are you using your own scale or condition formula for a multi-dimensional group condition?
=> You may try to analyze the import parameter KOMK or KOMP for a group condition in this formula. However, these parameters are not filled in group processing: '...The components komk and komp are initial during processing of group conditions...' ('i - Formulas' button on the 'Scales for Conditions' detailed screen in Customizing transaction T_06).
The inactive indicator KINAK is set by default to 'T' for group processing (inactive at header level) and is converted to the more general 'L' by the subsequent price determination.
(1.4) 'X - Inactive via formulae or incorrect'
If an error occurs during processing of multi-dimensional conditions (for example, during conversion to scale units or in a customer-specific formulas for scale bases), the condition is usually set to inactive status 'X'.
Check: Are all formulas used in connection with this condition (condition base formula, scale base formula, condition value formula) error-free?
(1.5) 'Y - Inactive because of subsequent price'
According to the price determination logic in SD, there can only ever be one valid price in a pricing procedure. All other conditions are surcharges or discounts in some shape or form. Accordingly, the last, valid pricing condition (valid condition record and not equal to zero) always applies. All pricing conditions in the schema with a lower level number are set to inactive status 'Y inactive because of subsequent price'.
Check: If the required pricing condition was unintentionally set to inactive status 'Y' by a subsequent pricing condition, you must decide (using an exclusion procedure, if required) which of the pricing conditions is varied. All pricing conditions with inactive indicator 'Y' are included in the exclusion procedure.
Regards,
Indranil

Condition type tables

Hi,
I need to know where are the caluculated values for freight FRC1 is getting stored in the purchase order conditions.

Hi,
Check this
This code i find one of the sites
select * from ekko.
       select * from konv where knumv = ekko-knumv
           "Get all the condition records for the purchase order
       endselect.
endselect.
* Get the info record conditions record
* First declare the record structure for the key
data: begin of int_konp,
             txt1(5),
             lifnr(5),
             matnr(18),
             txt2(4),
             txt3(1),
        end of int_konp.
clear: konh, konp, int_konp.
* data for the record key konh-vakey
int_konp-txt1    = '00000'.
int_konp-lifnr    = ekko-lifnr+5(5).
int_konp-matnr = ekpo-matnr(18).
int_konp-txt2    = 'ALL'.
int_konp-werks = ekpo-werks.
int_konp-txt3    = '0'.
select * from konh where      kschl = 'PB00'            "Conditions (Header)
                                     and datab => p_datum.       "valid from date
      if konh-vakey = int_konp.                                  "Conditions (Item)
             select single * from konp where knumh = konh-knumh.
             continue.
      endif.
endselect.
aRs

Item level Condition types appearnance by default in PO

Dear all,
I have created the pricing procedure. But, While creating a PO, I want the condition types to appear by default so that I can just enter the discount and freight %. in the input field. I do not want to enter the condition types for item manually.
Please reply.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Prash

Hi
Write a New Pricing Procedure with create all necessary condition types step by step i.e . from how the calculation should be done .
Sample format:
U App Proc. Step Cntr CTyp From To Man. Reqt SubTo Stat AltCTy AltCBV ActKy Accrls Print Mdt Description
A M   RM0000    1    1 PB00                   9                                     X         Gross Price
A M   RM0000    1    2 PBXX                 6 9                                     X         Gross Price
A M   RM0000    2      VA00                                                         X         Variants/Quantity
A M   RM0000    3      VA01                                                         X         Variants %
A M   RM0000    4      GAU1         X                        31                     X         Orignl Price of Gold
A M   RM0000    5      GAU2                31                32     32              X         Actual Price of Gold
A M   RM0000   10    1 RB00         X                                               X         Discount (Value)
A M   RM0000   10    2 RC00         X                                               X         Discount/Quantity
A M   RM0000   10    3 RA00         X                                                         Discount % on Net
A M   RM0000   10    4 RA01    1                                                    X         Discount % on Gross
A M   RM0000   10    5 HB00         X                                               X         Header Surch.(Value)
A M   RM0000   10    6 ZB00         X                                               X         Surcharge (Value)
A M   RM0000   10    7 ZC00         X                                               X         Surcharge/Quantity
A M   RM0000   10    8 ZA00         X                                               X         Surcharge % on Net
A M   RM0000   10    9 ZA01    1    X                                               X         Surcharge % on Gross
A M   RM0000   10   10 HB01         X                                               X         Header Disc.(Value)
A M   RM0000   10   11 RL01    1                                                    X         Vendor Discount %
Thanks & Regards,
Mani

Header Discount Condition type Control data

Dear All,
            I Maintained Header and Item discounts and frieght condition type and in header level the system is not calculating header discount or frieght for all items but its taking as item only.
       I think i made some wrong entry in condition type control data so please suggest me what should be maintained.

hi,
Might be you have maintained Caluculation Type as B     Fixed amount
I think you should mainatin it as C Quantity

VAT to be caluculated on Base Amount.

Dear Experts,
We want to caluculated VAT on base amount excluding Excise, as we are posting dealer invoice and posting manual excise through MRP indicator. Please suggest how to do that with doing any changes in tax procedure.
Regards
JKT

Hi ,
The best solution is to calculate the VAT from the base amount for dealer Invoice. You add one more % condition types called ZNET in MM Pricing procedure and bring the value of base amount to this conditon type by maintaining condition records 100 %. Now , Put this value in temporary memory by creating routine with the help of abapers.
Then , come to the Taxing Pricing procedure and add the line before VAT Condition type like VAT Base Amount and take the value from the memory by putting another routine and assign it in Alternative condition types. So , here you will have Base amount and now try to calculate your VAT amount from this value. you can use the same Taxing Procedure for both scenerios.( I.e Dealer Invoice or normal Purchase).
If you have any doubts , let me know for further clarification.
With Regards
S.Siva

Condition for Gold (or diesel)

I have maintained the alternate unit of measure in the material master as 1Litre = 1GAU.
I created a PO with the condition GAU2.
But its showing inactive status as 'Inactive via formulae of incorrect' When looking at the details of the condition (value X = inactive via formulae of incorrect).
Can anyone please tell why is it showing inactive? and how do i rectify it so that the condition is updated correctly when i update its price in MEK2
Edited by: gitika kale on Dec 8, 2010 12:40 PM

Hi,
Please refr the below link it may help you...........
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/Pricing-TechnicalInformationandAproachforPricingProblems

Caluculation Type

Hello,
Want to know the caluculation type like Percentage and fixed which we see in condition tables are maintained .Like what is the table and field for that.
Nettem

Hi Srikanth<
Following are aslo useful:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/dd/5616a5545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/content.htm
Alternation Calculation Type?
Hope this helps.
Please assign points as way to say thanks

New fright condition

Hi
My client requested to create new condition type for fright
which should be caliculated with percentage of (Basic + ED)
how to create the conditon type
perentage of (Basic + Excise duty)

Hi
You can create any condition type, for example copy the existing condition and save it. And assign the same in caluclation schema.
And in the Calucation schema,define the caluculation of the freight is based on (Basic+ ED)
Regards,
raman

Metal Prices Condition Table#85

Hi
M/06 Display Condition table (pricing purchasing)
Currently selection field is : Company Code
I want to maintain Material specific condition for GAU1 & GAU2.
Does it possible and make sense ?
regards
RG

Hi,
You will have to create a new condition table between the range 501 to 599 in the Tcode - M/03. In this double click on the field "Material" from the field catalog displayed on the right hand side.This field will get selected and displayed to your left hand side.Then Click on "Generate" option on the top.Once the table has been created , go to Tcode M/07 for creating Access sequence. Include the Condition table created above.Assign this Access sequence to the condition type for which you want the values to be determined based upon material code. Maintain the condition records in Tcode - MEK1.

Error in creation of a condition record

Hi to all, I've this error when I try to create a condition record :
Implementation of Method FIELD_CHECK/DEFAULT_VALUE_SUGGESTION for BAdI /SAPCND/ROLLNAME for filter ZIUSERSTATUS is missing
Message no. /SAPCND/MAINTENANCE719
Diagnosis
Implementation of BADI /SAPCND/ROLLNAME or method FIELD_CHECK/DEFAULT_VALUE_SUGGESTION is missing for the filter characteristic ZIUSERSTATUS.
If, however, the implementation is correct (see BADI Interface Documentation) and active, there is an error in the condition maintenance layer.
System Response
An exception or error occurred because condition maintenance cannot check, convert or lock/unlock the fields of a condition record.
Procedure
Contact the department responsible for carrying out the missing implementation in the case of application fields in the customer namespace. SAP is responsible for SAP fields which are set in the field catalog (/SAPCND/CTFC) and delivered, and if the field is supported as a possible field in a condition table. SAP is also responsible for the implementation of usage fields for SAP applications, just as with condition technique fields.
In cases where SAP is responsible, contact your responsible support organization.
Could someone help me please ?

Hi I just put the coding:
e_was_executed = 'X'.
into every method and however it worked.
Best Regards

IF Condition in RTF Help text

Hi,
I have RTF template which contains the field to display the column name. Below are my help text.
COLUMN1 is my XML tag and displaying AQUA color in my excel output.
<?COLUMN1?><xsl:attribute xdofo:ctx="block" name="background-color">Aqua</xsl:attribute>From above scenario, i need to add one more condition if there is no value in my XML tag then don't display the field in my excel output. For example. I have COLUMN1 and COLUMN2 XML Tag. Only COLUMN1 contains the value but COLUMN2 not. In my excel output the COLUMN2 value should not display.
Thanks

Please see if (How to make condition using XML tags to check NULL values in XML Publisher templates? [ID 414022.1]) helps.
Also, see XML Publisher Guide which can be accessed via http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/documentation/applications-167706.html
Thanks,
Hussein

IF and ABS condition statement in BEX query designer

Hi,
I would like to ask the best way for me to produce an acceptable result from Excel IF and ABS Condition statement.
The condition statement that I have on my Excel file is
=IF((A2-B2)>0,ABS(A2-B2),0)
I'm trying multiple times to reproduce this in BEX Query designer, unfortunately I'm getting a bad result or unacceptable formula.
Anyone who could help me with my issue?
Thanks,
Arnold

Hi Arnold,
Thank you,
Nanda

Classic report - Condition evaluated for every row

APEX 4.2.2
I am seeing something strange in a classic report region. A report started to fail at run-time with a strange error about bad syntax. When I run the page in debug mode, I see the following
print column headings
rows loop: 30 row(s)
...Execute Statement: begin wwv_flow.g_boolean := '' is not null;
end;
......Result = false
...Execute Statement: begin wwv_flow.g_boolean := '' is not null;
end;
......Result = false
...Execute Statement: begin wwv_flow.g_boolean := 'string with a embedded ' single quote' is not null;
end;
......Result = true
Looks like the APEX engine is evaluating a boolean expression after rendering and each and every row in the report. And for some strange reason, it is using a piece of data from my query's resultset and failing because of the bad syntax introduced due to the single-quote in the string.
I have never seen this before. Any idea what is going on?
Thanks

Howdy Paul, sorry should have provided all the details. No, this is a standard generic column template. Ah, you are right, drat I should have looked closer. The template has use a condition to show either a highlighted row or normal one. Sorry for the false alarm, I can take it from here. Enjoy your flight :-)

I had 2 Apple IDs but now Apple implemented new conditions and i can't use one of them after 90 days using the prior one..! - "This Device Is Already Associated With an Apple ID"

I have two Apple IDs because i travel frequently between Mexico and the US, and the apple stores offer different products, so i like to download music, movies and TV series from both sites.
Apparently apple changed the conditions, becauise until a few days ago i could log our from one account and log in from my other one. Yesterday i was at Miami International Airport and wanted to download a few chapters from one of my TV series (Walking Dead) to watch on my way to Mexico City, but a pop up window came up saying "this device is already associated with an apple id". Curoiously, the ID to which i was connected to was precisely the one under which i had bought weeks ago the chapters i was wanting to download from the cloud. So it says i have to wait 90 days to change apple id.... weard! probably i accepted these terms when dowloading a new IOS version, so legally I'm dead in complaining, but why is it that if i am paying for all that i buy as a model citizen i am now blocked from jumping from one apple id to another one???? I can certainly buy another ipad and have one with one id and another one with the other, but is there any other way i can keep the two in just one device?? If i don't use i-could would anything change? This is really making me mad, and is the first time i have thought of moving our of mac products into samsung or others and buy my music and movies somewhere else where stupid restrictions like this one do not exist. Please help with a solution!

OK, but in my ipad, the apple id i have in itues is already the one iwant to have, but th one i used to sin in for i-coud is the other one. Any tip as to how to change the apple id for icloud and any idea how to know what apps i bought with the other apple id so as to delete them from my ipad to avoid being asked to enter another apple id every time they get updated? thanks!

GAU2 Condition caluculation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for