Gcc 4.2.1(gccfss)  Solaris x86 c++

I build executable successfully, but when I run it, it does not work, and produce error message " invalid argument".
I am just wondering if x86 can run executable produced from gccfss.
Thanks

You are referencing with gccfss 4.2.1 cross compiler. The executable files are supposed to run on sparc targets. Thanks,
-- Lijuan

Similar Messages

  • Gcc 4.2.1 sun solaris x86

    We installed gcc 4.2.1 on sun solaris x86, but it does give me thousand of errors related to error lib and including. It used to be working under old version 3.4.3 compiler.
    Here is an sample error(even the basic string function" strcmp" is not recongnized):
    /lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/bits/c++locale.h: error: strcmp is not a member of std"
    It turns out all the stand libraries are not compiled correctly.
    Please help
    Thanks ahead

    fq_wjx wrote:
    The info on Sun gcc download page is really confusing, the gcc will work on solaris x86 and the compiled executable can ONLY be executed on SPARC server. What a frustrating experience!Could you please let us know which page is that? Because the one I found - called "Product Downloads GCC For SPARC Systems" has SPARC written all over it:
    http://www.sun.com/download/products.xml?id=43fb4c75

  • Error compiling GCC 4.3.1 on Solaris 10 x86 (Update 5)

    I am getting error when building GCC 4.3.1 on Solaris 10 x86.
    Have any of you built GCC 4.3.1 on Sol 10 x86?
    Here's the background:
    $ cat /etc/release
    Solaris 10 5/08 s10x_u5wos_10 X86
    Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    Use is subject to license terms.
    Assembled 24 March 2008
    $ isainfo -x
    amd64: cx16 mon sse3 sse2 sse fxsr mmx cmov amd_sysc cx8 tsc fpu
    i386: cx16 mon sse3 sse2 sse fxsr mmx cmov sep cx8 tsc fpu
    $ isalist
    amd64 pentium_pro+mmx pentium_pro pentium+mmx pentium i486 i386 i86
    $ echo $PATH
    /usr/sfw/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X/bin:/etc:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/bin
    $ ../gcc-4.3.1/configure program-suffix=-4.3.1 enable-languages=c,c++
    with-mpfr=/usr/local with-gmp=/usr/local
    with-gnu-as with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas
    without-gnu-ld with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld
    And here's the failure:
    /usr/local/src/gcc-4.3.1/s10i/./gcc/xgcc
    -B/usr/local/src/gcc-4.3.1/s10i/./gcc/
    -B/usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/bin/
    -B/usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/lib/
    -isystem /usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/include
    -isystem /usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/sys-include
    -O2 -O2 -g -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall
    -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
    -Wold-style-definition -isystem ./include -fPIC -g
    -DHAVE_GTHR_DEFAULT -DIN_LIBGCC2
    -D__GCC_FLOAT_NOT_NEEDED -shared
    -nodefaultlibs -Wl,-h,libgcc_s.so.1
    -Wl,-z,text -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-M,libgcc.map
    -o amd64/libgcc_s.so.1.tmp -g -fkeep-inline-functions
    -m64 -B./ muldi3s.o negdi2s.o lshrdi3s.o ashldi3s.o
    ashrdi3s.o
    cmpdi2s.o ucmpdi2s.o clearcache_s.o enableexecute_stack_s.o
    trampolines.o __main_s.o absvsi2s.o absvdi2s.o addvsi3s.o
    addvdi3s.o subvsi3s.o subvdi3s.o mulvsi3s.o mulvdi3s.o negvsi2s.o
    negvdi2s.o ctorss.o ffssi2s.o ffsdi2s.o clzs.o clzsi2s.o clzdi2s.o
    ctzsi2s.o ctzdi2s.o popcounttab_s.o popcountsi2s.o popcountdi2s.o
    paritysi2s.o paritydi2s.o powisf2s.o powidf2s.o powixf2s.o powitf2s.o
    mulsc3s.o muldc3s.o mulxc3s.o multc3s.o divsc3s.o divdc3s.o
    divxc3s.o divtc3s.o bswapsi2s.o bswapdi2s.o fixunssfsis.o
    fixunsdfsis.o fixunsxfsis.o fixsfdis.o fixdfdis.o fixxfdis.o fixtfdis.o
    fixunssfdis.o fixunsdfdis.o fixunsxfdis.o fixunstfdis.o floatdisfs.o
    floatdidfs.o floatdixfs.o floatditfs.o floatundisfs.o floatundidfs.o
    floatundixfs.o floatunditfs.o divdi3s.o moddi3s.o udivdi3s.o umoddi3s.o
    udivw_sdiv_s.o udivmoddi4s.o unwind-dw2_s.o unwind-dw2-fde_s.o unwind-sjlj_s.o
    gthr-gnat_s.o unwind-c_s.o emutls_s.o -lc && rm -f amd64/libgcc_s.so
    && if [ -f amd64/libgcc_s.so.1 ]; then mv -f amd64/libgcc_s.so.1 amd64/libgcc_s.so.1.backup; else true; fi
    && mv amd64/libgcc_s.so.1.tmp amd64/libgcc_s.so.1
    && ln -s libgcc_s.so.1 amd64/libgcc_s.so
    ld: fatal: unwind table: file /usr/local/src/gcc-4.3.1/s10i/./gcc/amd64/crtend.o: section .eh_frame:
    bad cie version 0: offset 0xfffffd7fffdfb700
    How do I build GCC 4.3.1 on Solaris x86?
    Thanks

    The bootstrap compiler is GCC 3.4.3.
    I tried Sun's assembler (/usr/ccs/bin/as) too and got another error (below)
    I also tried bootstrapping with Sun's Studio 12 compiler but that too failed.
    *$ pkginfo -x SUNWbinutils SMCbinut*
    SMCbinut binutils
    (x86) 2.17
    SUNWbinutils binutils - GNU binutils
    (i386) 11.10.0,REV=2005.01.08.01.09
    *$ whence gcc*
    /usr/sfw/bin/gcc
    *$ gcc -v*
    Reading specs from /usr/sfw/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/3.4.3/specs
    Configured with: /builds/sfw10-gate/usr/src/cmd/gcc/gcc-3.4.3/configure prefix=/usr/sfw with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas with-gnu-as with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld without-gnu-ld enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-shared
    Thread model: posix
    gcc version 3.4.3 (csl-sol210-3_4-branch+sol_rpath)
    The error this time is:
    /big1/usr.local.src/gcc-4.3.1/s10i/./gcc/xgcc -B/big1/usr.local.src/gcc-4.3.1/s10i/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/bin/ -B/usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/include -isystem /usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/sys-include -g -fkeep-inline-functions -m64 -O2 -O2 -g -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -isystem ./include -fPIC -g -DHAVE_GTHR_DEFAULT -DIN_LIBGCC2 -D__GCC_FLOAT_NOT_NEEDED -I. -I. -I../../.././gcc -I../../../../gcc-4.3.1/libgcc -I../../../../gcc-4.3.1/libgcc/. -I../../../../gcc-4.3.1/libgcc/../gcc -I../../../../gcc-4.3.1/libgcc/../include -DHAVE_CC_TLS -o gcov.o -MT gcov.o -MD -MP -MF gcov.dep -DLgcov -c ../../../../gcc-4.3.1/libgcc/../gcc/libgcov.c
    Assembler: libgcov.c
    "/var/tmp//ccYcw90K.s", line 1936 : Syntax error
    Near line: " repz cmpsb"

  • How about gccfss for Solaris x86/x64 platforms?

    Subject says it all... it could make compiling a lot of code out there a whole lot easier!
    Bob

    I also desire gccfss for Solaris x86/x64 platforms .
    In the interim I have downloaded the source and am attempting to create such a beast.
    It is slow progress to fix the unexpected script breakage, but it seems to be going OK:
    Problems:
    1.): Issues like "-mtune=v9" and an "embeded spec" in gcc and cpp (from files
    gccfss_src/build/gcc/gccspec.o and gccfss_src/build/gcc/cppspec.o).
    2.): Use of OPTTABLE_H = $(srcdir)/config/target-option-table.h with SPARC specific
    options throughout
    EG:
    #ifdef CROSS_COMPILE
    #define NATIVE \
    { "-native", "-xtarget=generic" }, \
    { "-xarch=native64", "-Zarch=v9 -Zarchm64=v9 -Zm=64" },\
    { "-xarch=native", "-Zarch=v8plus -Zarchm32=v8plus -Zarchm64=v9 -Zm=32" },\
    { "-xtarget=native64", "-Zarch=generic -Zarchm32=generic -Zarchm64=v9 -xchip=generic -xcache=generic -Zm=64"}, \
    { "-xtarget=native", "-Zarch=generic -Zarchm32=generic -Zarchm64=v9 -xchip=generic -xcache=generic -Zm=32"}
    #else
    #define NATIVE \
    { "-native", "-xtarget=native" }, \
    { "-xarch=native64", "-xarch=native64 -Zm=64"}, \
    { "-xarch=native", "-xarch=native -Zm=32"}, \
    { "-xtarget=native64", "-xtarget=native64 -Zm=64"}, \
    { "-xtarget=native", "-xtarget=native -Zm=32"}
    #endif
    Thus, one would need to change:
    { "-xarch=native64", "-Zarch=v9 -Zarchm64=v9 -Zm=64" },\
    to something like:
    { "-xarch=native64", "-xarch=386 -m64" },\
    3.): Copy the "sparc_output_scratch_registers()" function from file
    "gccfss_src/src/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.c" to "gccfss_src/src/gcc/tree-ir.c".
    4.): Use the undocumented command line option "-frtl-backend" when this error
    occurs during the build (a simple Makefile change):
    `-mcpu=' is deprecated. Use `-mtune=' or '-march=' instead.
    xgcc: SUNW0scgfss 4.2.0 has not been installed. Either install it or use -frtl-backend.
    5.): More ...
    All these issues occur because the scripts expect "--build=sparc-pc-solaris2.11" but
    I configured using "--build=i386-pc-solaris2.11" . It seems like it is going to work
    but I am yet to finish stage1 of the build (I do have a working "xgcc").
    Rob

  • Mounting a Solaris x86 CD/DVD from a remote Windows CD/DVD-ROM drive

    Greetings, all.
    Is it possible to mount a remote Windows CD/DVD-ROM drive? I have the Solaris 10x86 Companion Software DVD sitting in a CD/DVD-ROM drive that's installed on a Windows server on my network. It is shared-out (F:) and the two servers can ping each other. I've also confirmed the NFS services/daemons are running on the Solaris x86 machine. I've tried the following variations but, all have failed to produce successful results:
    # mount -F nfs x.x.x.x:/f /mnt
    nfs mount: x.x.x.x: : RPC: Program not registered
    nfs mount: retrying: /mnt
    # mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/f /mnt
    mount: No such device
    mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/f
    # mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/F /mnt
    mount: No such device
    mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/F
    [FYI: S10_106_SOFTWARE is the DVD's label as reported by Windows Explorer.]
    # mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/S10_106_SOFTWARE /mnt
    mount: No such device
    mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/S10_106_SOFTWARE
    # mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/s10_106_software /mnt
    mount: No such device
    mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/s10_106_software
    # mount -F nfs x.x.x.x:/S10_106_SOFTWARE /mnt
    nfs mount: x.x.x.x: : RPC: Program not registered
    nfs mount: retrying: /mnt
    # mount -F nfs x.x.x.x:/s10_106_software /mnt
    nfs mount: x.x.x.x: : RPC: Program not registered
    nfs mount: retrying: /mnt
    # mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/f/s10_106_software /mnt
    mount: No such device
    mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/f/s10_106_software
    # mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/F/s10_106_software /mnt
    mount: No such device
    mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/F/s10_106_software
    # mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/f/S10_106_SOFTWARE /mnt
    mount: No such device
    mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/f/S10_106_SOFTWARE
    # mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/F/S10_106_SOFTWARE /mnt
    mount: No such device
    mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/F/S10_106_SOFTWARE
    I've also tried mounting it at bootup by adding the appropriate entry in the /etc/vfstab file but, this does not work as well. I've tried Google'ing for an answer to my issue but, I haven't been able to find anything that applies directly to what I'm reporting. It's usually chatter about mounting from one UNIX server to another. Any advice from the community would be greatly appreciated.

    After three weeks, you deserve a reply. Windoze does
    not natively support NFS.Also deserves a decent answer...
    There are two ways to do this:
    Install Microsoft's free "Windows Services for UNIX," which includes a Windows NFS server; or
    Install the 'sharity' package (google for it); it provides Solaris systems the ability to mount Windows shares

  • Install oracle 8.1.7 on Solaris(x86) 10 b72

    Has anyone Installed oracle 8.1.7 on Solaris(x86) 10 b72???
    When I run runInstaller I have
    135$ Initializing Java Virtual Machine from ../stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/jre. Please wait...
    ld.so.1: /ora_inst/stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/i386/native_threads/jre: fatal: relocation error: file /ora_inst/install/../stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/../lib/i386/native_threads/libawt.so: symbol XShmQueryExtension: referenced symbol not found (/ora_inst/install/../stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/../lib/i386/native_threads/libawt.so)
    ld.so.1: /ora_inst/stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/i386/native_threads/jre: fatal: relocation error: file /ora_inst/install/../stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/../lib/i386/native_threads/libawt.so: symbol XShmQueryExtension: referenced symbol not found (/ora_inst/install/../stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/../lib/i386/native_threads/libawt.so)
    java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:

    try this:
    LD_PRELOAD="libX11.so libXext.so" ; export LD_PRELOAD
    ./runInstaller

  • Oracle 8.1.5 Client/WLS/Solaris x86

    has anyone been able to get Oracle's client 8.1.5 running on Solaris x86 in conjunction with WLS to talk to back-end Oracle? Any help would be greatly appreciated.thanks.

    This will not work. We have not built the native libraries to work with
    Solaris on Intel..
    I suggest trying the platform independent type 4 JDBC driver available for
    free from Oracle. It is supported (as is any JDBC driver) with WebLogic
    Server. To download it:
    Go to http://www.oracle.com and select the "Download" option.
    From the resulting page, use the "Select Utility or Driver" dropdown to
    select Oracle JDBC drivers
    From the resulting page, scroll down a little (since SQLJ stuff appears at
    the top).
    Or, to go directly there:
    http://technet.oracle.com/software/tech/java/sqlj_jdbc/software_index.htm
    Thanks,
    Michael
    Michael Girdley
    BEA Systems Inc
    "Dean Davis" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:3a267487$[email protected]..
    has anyone been able to get Oracle's client 8.1.5 running on Solaris x86in conjunction with WLS to talk to back-end Oracle? Any help would be
    greatly appreciated.thanks.

  • Install error for Oracle 10g on Solaris x86 64-bit.  NETCA won't run

    Hi All,
    I'm installing Oracle 10.2.0.1 on Solaris x86 64-bit. I run the Oracle installer and all runs well until the NETCA portion of the install. It then errors (error file below). When i attempt to run NETCA outside of the installer i'm getting the same error output. I have verified my OS version and that all dependent packages are installed. I'm not sure what is causing this. Any help would be greatly appriciated.
    thanks, dave
    ERROR FILE:
    An unexpected exception has been detected in native code outside the VM.
    Unexpected Signal : 11 occurred at PC=0xFEEF24E8
    Function=strchr+0x8
    Library=/lib/libc.so.1
    Current Java thread:
         at oracle.net.common.NetGetEnv.getDNSDomain(Native Method)
         at oracle.net.ca.ConfigureProfile.setDefaultProfileParams(Unknown Source)
         at oracle.net.ca.InitialSetup.setupConfigObjects(Unknown Source)
         at oracle.net.ca.InitialSetup.<init>(Unknown Source)
         at oracle.net.ca.NetCA.main(Unknown Source)
    Dynamic libraries:
    0x8050000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/bin/java
    0xfefc0000      /lib/libthread.so.1
    0xfefd0000      /lib/libdl.so.1
    0xfeed0000      /lib/libc.so.1
    0xfea00000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so
    0xfee80000      /usr/lib/libCrun.so.1
    0xfee50000      /lib/libsocket.so.1
    0xfedc0000      /lib/libnsl.so.1
    0xfeda0000      /lib/libm.so.1
    0xfeeb0000      /usr/lib/libsched.so.1
    0xfe9a0000      /lib/libm.so.2
    0xfed50000      /lib/libscf.so.1
    0xfe980000      /lib/libdoor.so.1
    0xfe960000      /lib/libuutil.so.1
    0xfe940000      /lib/libmd5.so.1
    0xfe920000      /lib/libmp.so.2
    0xfe8e0000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/native_threads/libhpi.so
    0xfe890000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libverify.so
    0xfe850000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so
    0xfe830000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libzip.so
    0xf1a00000      /usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8.so.3
    0xfc780000      /usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8/methods_en_US.UTF-8.so.3
    0xf13c0000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libawt.so
    0xf0f90000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libmlib_image.so
    0xf0f30000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/motif21/libmawt.so
    0xf0d50000      /usr/dt/lib/libXm.so.4
    0xf0cf0000      /usr/openwin/lib/libXt.so.4
    0xf0cc0000      /usr/openwin/lib/libXext.so.0
    0xf1890000      /usr/openwin/lib/libXtst.so.1
    0xf0c30000      /usr/openwin/lib/libX11.so.4
    0xf0be0000      /usr/openwin/lib/libdps.so.5
    0xf0a90000      /usr/openwin/lib/libSM.so.6
    0xf0a70000      /usr/openwin/lib/libICE.so.6
    0xf0a30000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libnjni10.so
    0xefe00000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libclntsh.so.10.1
    0xefc60000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libnnz10.so
    0xf0a10000      /lib/libkstat.so.1
    0xefc40000      /lib/libgen.so.1
    0xefc20000      /lib/librt.so.1
    0xefbf0000      /lib/libaio.so.1
    0xefbd0000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libldapjclnt10.so
    Heap at VM Abort:
    Heap
    def new generation total 576K, used 343K [0xf1e00000, 0xf1ea0000, 0xf22e0000)
    eden space 512K, 55% used [0xf1e00000, 0xf1e467f8, 0xf1e80000)
    from space 64K, 96% used [0xf1e80000, 0xf1e8f798, 0xf1e90000)
    to space 64K, 0% used [0xf1e90000, 0xf1e90000, 0xf1ea0000)
    tenured generation total 1408K, used 338K [0xf22e0000, 0xf2440000, 0xf5e00000)
    the space 1408K, 24% used [0xf22e0000, 0xf2334ab8, 0xf2334c00, 0xf2440000)
    compacting perm gen total 4096K, used 3580K [0xf5e00000, 0xf6200000, 0xf9e00000)
    the space 4096K, 87% used [0xf5e00000, 0xf617f170, 0xf617f200, 0xf6200000)
    Local Time = Tue Aug 29 13:49:22 2006
    Elapsed Time = 225
    # The exception above was detected in native code outside the VM
    # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.4.2_05-b04 mixed mode)
    #

    I have the same problem on Linux Debian 3.0.
    My /etc/hosts looks like:
    127.0.0.1     localhost.localdomain     localhost
    #192.168.100.1     bt.lan.home     bt
    #192.168.100.5     jacek.lan.home     jacek
    # The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
    ::1     ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
    fe00::0 ip6-localnet
    ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix
    ff02::1 ip6-allnodes
    ff02::2 ip6-allrouters
    ff02::3 ip6-allhostsPlease help.

  • How to upgrade oracle 32 to 64 bit on sun solaris x86 64 bit OS?

    Hi,
    I want to upgrade/convert 32 bit Oracle Database 10.2.0.2 to 64 bit database. Existing 32 bit database is RAC and it is running on Sun Solaris X86 64 bit OS.
    First, I want to know is it possible?
    If yes, then what are the exact steps?

    Hi,
    Such a migration can be done, just follow the steps in Metalink note 62290.1
    It is important to remember that 64-bit database requires more shared pool memory so you should increase your shared pool size.
    Liron Amitzi
    Senior DBA consultant
    [www.dbsnaps.com]
    [www.orbiumsoftware.com]
    Edited by: Liron Amitzi on Jul 1, 2009 3:08 PM

  • How to integrate a Solaris x86 server on Sun Management Center ?

    Hello people,
    I want to integrate a Solaris x86 server on Sun Management Center platform.
    If I'm not wrong, SunMC doesn't run for Solaris x86, server and client only as console with Java.
    In speat of it, I try to install Sun Management Center 3.0 Agent for Solaris x86.
    It seems to be ok, install packages, but when execute es-setup script, intents to create the following directory:
    /opt/SUNWsymon/base/bin/sparc-sun-solaris2.8
    I supose that in this directory, SunMC will install sparc binary files
    At this point, I can't follow the installation and abort it.
    Can anybody give me ideas to install and integrate my solaris x86 server on SunMC ?
    Thanks

    Hi Hisham,
    hishooooo wrote:
    Dear Gents,
    I have one X86 Solaris Server configured and installed to be Sun Management Center Server.
    successfully i could monitor the Sun Solaris Servers after i have installed the SMC agent on them.
    my problem is that i could not install the SMC agent on Red Hat Linux. as i could not find an easy document or steps to do so.
    could you guide please?If you still have a copy of your SunMC media around, the same ["es-inst"|http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-2215/command-line-1?l=en&a=view] program you use to install Solaris Agents should work on Linux as well. It autodetects OS type and will install Solaris packages or RPMs as appropriate.
    Regards,
    [email protected]
    http://www.HalcyonInc.com

  • How to integrate Solaris x86 server on Sun Management Center ?

    Hello people,
    I want to integrate a Solaris x86 server on Sun Management Center platform.
    If I'm not wrong, SunMC doesn't run for Solaris x86, server and client only as console with Java.
    In speat of it, I try to install Sun Management Center 3.0 Agent for Solaris x86.
    It seems to be ok, install packages, but when execute es-setup script, intents to create the following directory:
    /opt/SUNWsymon/base/bin/sparc-sun-solaris2.8
    I supose that in this directory, SunMC will install sparc binary files
    At this point, I can't follow the installation and abort it.
    Can anybody give me ideas to install and integrate my solaris x86 server on SunMC ?
    Thanks

    Hi
    From the Unix prompt enter oemapp console(for v9.x). If you are using earlier versions it is oemapp console (for starting the console) and oemapp dbastudio(for starting dba studio)
    For starting OMS enter: oemctrl start oms.
    Hope this helps
    sarath

  • From 7.3 on NT to 8 on Solaris x86?

    Has Oracle ported Oracle8 for Solaris x86?

    Hi,
    usually I expect people to do a little research and I do not give everything chewed.
    Point 4:
    go to the
    <b>Oracle9i Database Migration Release 2 (9.2)</b>
    go to the chapter 3
    <b>Upgrading a Database to the New Oracle9i Release</b>
    go to the point:
    <b>Upgrade the Database Manually</b>
    Exactly from here:
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96530/upgrade.htm#1009200
    Keep in mind
    1) that the <i>EXACT </i>procedure you are following it is not indicated in this manual
    2) you have to think a little ( do you have all the windows services created on the destination system? if not, you have to create them ... )
    3) this procedure is not supported by SAP. It is a valid option but not supported by them. You have to practice until you get all the points correctly

  • Oracle RAC 10g on Solaris x86 using vmware

    Guys,
    I am practising 10g RAC installation on my laptop, wherein I have vmware workstation and
    solaris-x86 version 10 installed on it.
    I am trying to install Oracle 10g clusterware.
    I have followed the steps for clusterware installation.
    I am facing an errror on one of the node while running root.sh.
    On the first node, the root.sh runs fine.
    The following is the log.
    bash-3.00# ./root.sh
    WARNING: directory '/u01/app/oracle/product' is not owned by root
    WARNING: directory '/u01/app/oracle' is not owned by root
    WARNING: directory '/u01/app' is not owned by root
    WARNING: directory '/u01' is not owned by root
    Checking to see if Oracle CRS stack is already configured
    Setting the permissions on OCR backup directory
    Setting up NS directories
    Oracle Cluster Registry configuration upgraded successfully
    WARNING: directory '/u01/app/oracle/product' is not owned by root
    WARNING: directory '/u01/app/oracle' is not owned by root
    WARNING: directory '/u01/app' is not owned by root
    WARNING: directory '/u01' is not owned by root
    Successfully accumulated necessary OCR keys.
    Using ports: CSS=49895 CRS=49896 EVMC=49898 and EVMR=49897.
    node <nodenumber>: <nodename> <private interconnect name> <hostname>
    node 1: xsan001 xsan001-priv xsan001
    node 2: xsan002 xsan002-priv xsan002
    Creating OCR keys for user 'root', privgrp 'root'..
    Operation successful.
    Now formatting voting device: /dev/rdsk/c0d0s4
    Format of 1 voting devices complete.
    Startup will be queued to init within 30 seconds.
    Adding daemons to inittab
    Expecting the CRS daemons to be up within 600 seconds.
    CSS is active on these nodes.
    xsan001
    CSS is inactive on these nodes.
    xsan002
    Local node checking complete.
    Run root.sh on remaining nodes to start CRS daemons.
    =============================
    On the second node, the root.sh gives error.
    bash-3.00# ./root.sh
    WARNING: directory '/u01/app/oracle/product' is not owned by root
    WARNING: directory '/u01/app/oracle' is not owned by root
    WARNING: directory '/u01/app' is not owned by root
    WARNING: directory '/u01' is not owned by root
    Checking to see if Oracle CRS stack is already configured
    Setting the permissions on OCR backup directory
    Setting up NS directories
    Oracle Cluster Registry configuration upgraded successfully
    WARNING: directory '/u01/app/oracle/product' is not owned by root
    WARNING: directory '/u01/app/oracle' is not owned by root
    WARNING: directory '/u01/app' is not owned by root
    WARNING: directory '/u01' is not owned by root
    Successfully accumulated necessary OCR keys.
    Using ports: CSS=49895 CRS=49896 EVMC=49898 and EVMR=49897.
    node <nodenumber>: <nodename> <private interconnect name> <hostname>
    node 1: xsan001 xsan001-priv xsan001
    node 2: xsan002 xsan002-priv xsan002
    Creating OCR keys for user 'root', privgrp 'root'..
    Operation successful.
    Now formatting voting device: /dev/rdsk/c0d0s4
    Format of 1 voting devices complete.
    Startup will be queued to init within 30 seconds.
    Adding daemons to inittab
    Expecting the CRS daemons to be up within 600 seconds.
    Failure at final check of Oracle CRS stack.
    10
    Can you provide some sort of clue what could be done to resolve the above error?

    Refer to http://www.oracleracsig.org/ Under documents section select OS=Solaris. You will find a document on Oracle RAC on Solaris10 using Vmware.

  • Help with evaluation for Solaris x86

    Hello,
    I would like to evaluate Oracle Identity Manager and Access Manager products at the latest version possible -- the host system(s) are Solaris x86 (SunOS .5.10) Unfortunately, I am having a bit of trouble compiling the list of packages/versions to achieve this for this platform. For instance, on the downloads page it appears that OIM is not available for Solaris x86, not even in older versions(?)
    Thank you in advance,
    Scott

    Hi Scott,
    I'm pretty sure that x86 Solaris is not yet certified to run the Identity Management suite. I've been involved in an evaluation process and we ran it all on RedHat Enterprise Server Release 4 Update 5, without too many problems.
    cheers,
    James

  • Core 2 Duo and solaris x86 11/06 works for me

    This is FYI, since I seen (and posted) problems, but I haven't seen the solution posted.
    I have successfully gotten solaris x86 11/06 to install and run on my core 2 duo machine. I had tried solaris x86 06/06, but I could only run in 32bit mode until patch 118855-19 was installed. It looks like 118855-33 is the baseline for 11/06.
    With 06/06 I had to edit the grub command and add " kernel/unix" to the end of the 2nd line. This would force 32 bit mode rather than 64 bit. If I tried 64 bit, it would enter an endless reboot cycle. Once I installed the patch to 118855-19 I could run solaris 10 06/06 in 64 bit mode without issue.
    Again, since solaris 10 11/06 is at 118855-33, it runs on my core2 machine straight from the install.
    Hope this helps

    On a laptop there is little point with running a 64-bit operating system unless it physically has more than 4gb of ram, or if you are processing datasets exceeding 4GB of ram. Unless you're into assembly or use Solaris for some reason to manipulate media, little is to be gained by using 64-bit versions if anything. The increased pointer, integer, and padding causes more memory to use for the same software, most software on 64-bit operating systems runs in 32-bit mode because there is no need to have 16 exabyte memory addressing capability for anything but media encoders, giant databases, or extremely bloated single-threaded software. Sun Java Creator takes a heck of a lot of ram, but even at peak it's still under 4GB. If you move files bigger than 4GB, the ability to memory map all 4096MB might have less overhead on a 64-bit operating system, but generally from an end-user perspective, especially on a fast Intel or Opteron system, you won't notice the difference much. Solaris is bi-arch, a large chunk of Windows Vista and XP x64 is bi-arch, and most of FreeBSD and Linux are bi-arch in 64-bit versions, as I said, no point in making everything 64-bit. 64-bit device drivers is an issue for every OS, you should stick with 32-bit on a laptop, and hold off on desktops unless you need extended assembly registers available only in 64-bit mode.

Maybe you are looking for