General Design Structure Advice

I'm looking for a general strategy for my current project.
I have a Module class with several sub classes. These modules
are connected to each other with a Connection class. And I need to
dynamically create and destroy these connections. For now, each
parent module contains an array of all it's child modules. Each
instance of the Connection class contains an array of the 2 modules
it is connecting.
Is this the best way of going about this? or should I be
creating a global list of all the connections and all the
modules?

The nice thing about this upgrade is that we are moving from a system that has less storage to a system with more storage.
This database isn't very large, and all the files on the entire system are under 200GB in total size. The data takes probably near 60GB, while the backup space is somewhere in the 80-90GB ballpark.
My main goal with this disk configuration is to try and achieve the highest reliability possible to prevent future failures.
Instead of trying to micro-manage the storage I thought an area for the FRA and the rest for the data on different disks and controllers would be a good approach because it keeps space available and reduces the possibility of volume space pressure.
If you need anything else please let me know.
Thanks!

Similar Messages

Bad performance when deleting report column in webi(with "Design – Structure only")

Hi all,
One of our customer has recently upgraded from BO XI to BO4.1. In the new BO 4.1, they encountered a bad performance issue when they were deleting a column in Webi(using "Design – Structure only" mode).
With “Design – Structure only" mode, it took webi about 10 seconds to complete after the customer right-clicked a report column and clicked the "delete". The customer said that they only need to wait for less than 1 second when they did the same in BO XI old version.
The new BO version used is 4.1SP02, installed in Windows Server 2008 R2. (Server with 32 core CPU, 32G memory)
This bad performance happened in both Webi web and Rich Client. (in Webi Rich Client, the performance is a little bit better. The 'delete column' action takes about 8 seconds to complete).
Do anyone know how to tune this performance in webi? Thank you.
Besides, it seems that each time we are making change in the webi report structure in IE or Rich Client, webi need to interact with Server site to upload the changes. Is there any option to change this behavior? Say, do not upload change to Server for when 'deleting report column', only trigger the upload after a set of actions(e.g. trigger when click the "Save" button).
Thank you.
Regards,
Eton.

Hi all,
Could anyone help me on this? Thanks!
What customer concerns now is that when they did the same 'column editing' action in BO XI R2 for the same report, they did not need to wait. And they need to wait for at least 7-8 second in the BO 4.1SP02 environment for this action to complete.(data already purged, in structure-only mode)
One more information about the webi report being editing is: there are many sheets in the report(about 6~10 sheets in one report). Customer don't want to separate these sheet into different reports as it will increase the effort of their end users to locate similar report sheets.
Regards,
Eton.

General database structure

Can you Please explain about the general database structure(Conventional one).
Thanks
Govind

The best thing is to read oracle documentation. You can download documentation from otn site. Read the documentation and then come to the forum for any kind of help.
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/index.htm

General tree structure

Is there still no general tree structure in Java? I'd like something along the likes of TreeSet or TreeMap, but without the compare part, and where each node can hold 0..n children.
I know this is easy to implement, having done quite a few during my student years, but if any of the API classes are able to handle it directly, I'd sure like to know.
Does anyone know of any fitting classes?

Maybe you can use DefaultMutableTreeNode. It's a general tree class of Swing.
Or why not encode the tree structure in a key. Say you have up to 10 mother companies each having up to 10 daugthers. You can code these 100 companies as numbers between 0 and 99. For example 52 would be the second daughter of the fifth mother, etcetera. Then you just keep the objects sorted on key in an ArrayList or maybe use a HashMap depending on your searching needs.

Best design structure for 4710's

We are implementing 4710's in our core network..
what could be the best design structure from a simplicity point
one interface vlan for for vips---connected front end to the core..and backend for servers (routed mode)
should you have more than one interface vlan for servers and or clients?
at which point would u need multi context.......besides an Admin context
should you put a management interface on each context?

We are implementing 4710's in our core network..
--what could be the best design structure from a simplicity point
Design would vary based on specific requirements. To connect it to a specific layer on the network (core/agg) you would have to check the traffic flow to decide what suits you best.
In terms of ACE design, if source IP visibility is not a requirement, One-arm mode with Source NAT provides the ability for non load balanced traffic to bypass the ACE. If it is a requirement you can use PBRs but that complicates things a little because you have to now manage the routers for changes on the ACE. With routed mode, the design is simple and servers point to the ACE as their default gateway. Need to weigh the pros and cons of each of the options based on the specific requirements.
--one interface vlan for for vips---connected front end to the core..and backend for servers (routed mode)
Yes - for routed mode that would be the way to do it. In this case, in addition to load balancing, the ACE routes non-loadbalanced traffic to/from the servers.
should you have more than one interface vlan for servers and or clients?
- Depends in your subnets. If you have separate subnets for your web/app/db servers then it is a good idea to have different subnets. Also, you may want to think about separate contexts if you want complete isolation between the layers.
--at which point would u need multi context.......besides an Admin context
As far as possible, try to keep the Admin context only for administration. Make a separate context(s) for load balancing and manage the resources to it.
--should you put a management interface on each context?
Yes - that would give you the ability to have different users manage only their contexts.
Hope that helps .

Topic Design/Structure = Speed of updating content in project

1. Yes, we do incorporate screen captures in our topics, and
I have streamlined as much as I can, stripping out all duplicates
and linking to the source.
2. I do realize that by use of the pop-up images, which I use
a lot, it does impact the speed simply by virtue of the image size.
3. MY question is this: I was hired to maintain a system that
already exists and have taught myself a lot of streamlining
features but am sure there are others I'm not aware of. I was just
wondering if maybe there was a better design structure I could
apply to improve the efficiency of the topics. Here is our current
structure:
1 Main project under which all other projects (CHM) are
linked as Merged Topics.
300+ Topics - each one creating a separate CHM that is then
merged into the main project
Some of these individual topics are quite large (we have 1
topic per screen/feature). I have broken out as much as I can into
common topics and link to those rather than repeating information;
but even with that, I still have some huge ones such as the one I'm
working today.
It is taking like 1 minute at times from clicking "Insert
hyperlink" till I get the dialog to select the bookmark and several
minutes just for the topic to open or compile.
I've come across terms such as "Page" "Topic" "Book" "Pane"
etc, and was just wondering if maybe we need to tweak our
underlying structure to improve in this area. Any suggestions?
Thanks a heap!

Welcome to our community
Sounds like RoboHelp would certainly fit the bill for what you are seeking. Basically it works as follows:
You maintain all the content on your local PC.
You then Generate a Web Based output such as WebHelp, FlashHelp or AIR Help (Web Based).
Once the output has been created, you publish it to the Web location.
So perhaps you add a few pages and change some others.
You make those changes in your local copy of RoboHelp and Generate the Web Based output again.
You then publish the output to the Web location to populate the updates.
The first time you publish output ALL the content has to be copied across. But at that time, RoboHelp makes a list of what files were copied.
Subsequent publish operations only copy the files that need to be copied. So the first time through it may take a few minutes to copy all the content. But subsequent publish cycles should take just a brief while. Often, just a few seconds.
Cheers... Rick
Helpful and Handy Links
RoboHelp Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
Begin learning RoboHelp HTML 7 or 8 moments from now - $24.95!
Adobe Certified RoboHelp HTML Training
SorcererStone Blog
RoboHelp eBooks

Application Structure Advice - preplanning

Hi all -
Thought I would get some advice from you before starting up a new project. Not really how to do it, just which structure to use...
Originally I took over a project at my work that is very unresponsive and the way its coded it cannot accurately do what we are going to want it to do down the road. I've tried to tell myself it wasn't needed, but I'm going to have to just recode the whole thing.
After just going to the labview intermediate classes, i'm a bit confused as to which scheme would work out better for the application...producer consumer w/events or producer consumer w/data...
Basically the program is a final test that is completely automated on one side. So the user interacts by inputting serial numbers, models etc. that change the procedure of the test cycle. Communications are at a slow 1200 baud over serial and the test per unit takes about 2-3 days. Slow speed monitoring is required on few indicators. Thats about it on that end. Also though there is an entire manual test capability, that tries to give real time results back about what's going on with our test unit. Currently it allows for us to change settings on the test hardware programatically...again through the serial port.
Later on down the road we will need to start using DAQ equipment to enhance the testing. At present there is about a 7-8 second delay from when you hit a control and something happens. Granted the communications are extremely slow, but still c'mon now thats just rediculus lol.
Any recommendations on the kind of structure that should be used to control this? Currently its being implemented as a huge state machine with 8 or so states.
LV7.1, LV8.5

Something I believe in is that the hardest part of any new job is figuring out how to think about it. So I like to start by getting as much as possible on paper before I start coding. To begin with, you need to know what the desired User Interface is like. How do the operators want to use it? What will be the desired workflow for the tool? What are the response time requirements.
At the same time consider the system from the standpoint of the physical process that you're interacting with. What are the operational constraints? What are your users going to want to do in the future? What are the inputs and outputs? What is the instrumentation like? What sorts of errors can occur and how fast do you need to be able to respond to them? How do you recover from errors?
Finally, what data are you going to be collecting? How fast? What are you going to do with it? Is the customer expecting a report of some kind? What is the data's lifespan? How will results be archived and managed?
The reasons for asking these questions up front are two-fold: First, the answers to these questions (and a bunch more) will provide the nucleus of a document that will tell your customer exactly what they will get and you exactly what you need to do. Second, it should be obvious that there is no "best" universal system architecture. Each possibility has its own advantages and disadvantages. Knowing the answers to these questions will help you understand your problem and the best architecture for that particular problem. The biggest messes I have ever had to deal with (and in 20 years I've encountered some real architectural train wrecks) resulted from people deciding ahead of time what the system architecture was going to be and then trying to force-fit an application into a structure that didn't suit it.
Most important you need to sit down and have a heart-to-heart talk with your boss to set their expectations. If you do this right you may not develop any code at all for a couple weeks and if your boss is the type that "wants to see results" you need to educate them on what the results will look like. Sometimes its code, sometimes its documentation - but in either case it will be moving the project forward. And if your boss should acknowledge that "theoretically" working in this way is best, but then goes on to say, "...we don't have time to do it the right way..." Save yourself some time and start polishing up your resume now... it won't be long before you'll be needing it.
Mike...
Certified Professional Instructor
Certified LabVIEW Architect
LabVIEW Champion
"... after all, He's not a tame lion..."
Be thinking ahead and mark your dance card for NI Week 2015 now: TS 6139 - Object Oriented First Steps

Design/pitfall advice

HI.
First a disclaimer: I am VERY new to JAVA.
I'd like to describe to you what I have done and to ask
for general advice on style, methodology, etc..
There are two databases DB1,DB2.
There are three tables, ta,tb,tc in each DB.
where DB1.ta should = DB2.ta.
The program has three classes, one for each kind of table.
It brings down the data for each table.
The program checks the data between these sets of tables and
presents the differences to the user in modifiable Jtables.
there are one connection and 6 recordsets (one for each table)
existing at any one time.
The differences between DB1.ta and DB2.ta are presented in one JTable on its on JTabbedPanel, DB1.tb & DB2.tb are on their own, etc.
The user can see the differences and update the table of choice.
This all seems to work fine. What I am after here is any advice on style, possible pitfalls, etc.
If this sounds like a bad plan, can you describe a different approach?
thanks for your thoughts.

Hi,
You might want to post this at the JDBC forum:
http://forum.java.sun.com/forum.jspa?forumID=48

Basic XML/DTD design/structure validity.

I would like some clarification on valid XML structure - is it valid to have an XML element content both CDATA & other elements? I noticed that by using the keyword ANY in my DTD, that the SAX parser that I'm using seems to accept the following -
<firstElement att="1">
Some character values.
<secondElement att="2"/>
</firstElement>
However, is this a poor design choice? I have made several attempts to read up on DTD/XML structure and have not found anything which explains whether that structure/approach is valid or not.
Many thanks!
~ RomT

Yes, you can do that. It's called "mixed content" in the markup biz. And as you suspect, it's not the greatest design choice. No doubt there are uses for it -- for example if you have a text string and you want to mark off pieces of it as being bold or italic -- but you should probably try to avoid it if possible.

Designer Install Advice Needed

Hi,
It has been a number of years since I used designer (6years in fact) but I want to try and get back into it.
What is the simplest way to get a working designer implementation going. I don't have any oracle database (or any other products) installed at the moment.
I have looked at the download section and the number of different versions of designer and databases is a bit daunting - a bit of help on what versions to download, install and in what order so as I don't jump down any blind alleys.
I have a couple of computers running XP with a GB of Ram in each and many GB of free disk space. I would prefer to run the whole thing on one box if possible.
Any advice greatly appreciated,
Cheers
JP

JP,
I would suggest that you pick the latest version; Designer 10gR2 (10.1.2.0.2). The complete certification information for Designer is on metalink (metalink.oracle.com, click on the Certify tab), but Designer 10gR2 is certified with 10.1.0.4 and 10.2.0.1 Oracle database versions.
If you are running Windows XP, you can install both the DB and the Designer client on the same machine (in different Oracle Homes). But with 1GB of RAM, it might be a bit slow.
- Suresh

General Design Questions

Hello,
I am developing a web application and could use some architectural advice. I've done lots of reading already, but could use some direction from those who have more experience in multi-tier development and administration than I. You'll find my proposed solution listed below and then I have some questions at the bottom. I think my architecture is fairly standard and simple to understand--I probably wrote more than necessary for you to understand it. I'd really appreciate some feedback and practical insights. Here is a description of the system:
Presentation Layer
So far, the presentation tier consists of an Apache Tomcat Server to run Servlets and generate one HTML page. The HTML page contains an embedded MDI style Applet with inner frames, etc.; hence, the solution is Applet-centric rather than HTML-centric. The low volume of HTML is why I decided against JSPs for now.
Business Tier
I am planning to use the J2EE 1.4 Application Server that is included with the J2EE distribution. All database transactions would be handled by Entity Beans and for computations I'll use Session Beans. The most resource intensive computational process will be a linear optimization program that can compute large matrices.
Enterprise Tier
I?ll probably use MySql, although we have an Oracle 8 database at our disposal. Disadvantage of MySql is that it won't have triggers until next release, but maybe I can find a work-around for now. Advantage is that an eventual migration to Linux will be easier on the wallet.
Additional Information
We plan to use the system within our company at first, with probably about 5 or less simultaneous users. Our field engineer will also have access from his laptop. That means he'll download the Applet-embedded HTML page from our server via the Internet. Once loaded, all navigation will be Applet-centered. Data transfer from the Applet to Servlet will be via standard HTTP.
Eventually we would like to give access of our system to a client firm. In other words, we would be acting as an application service provider and they would access our application via the Internet. The Applet-embedded HTML page would load onto their system. The volume would be low--5 simultaneous users max. All users are well-defined in advance. Again, low volume HTML generation--Applet-centric.
My Questions
1). Is the J2EE 1.4 Application Server a good production solution for the conditions that I described above? Or is it better to invest in a commercial product like Sun Java System Application Server 7 ? Or should I forget the application server concept completely?
2). If I use the J2EE Application Server, is this a good platform for running computational programs (via Session Beans)? Or is it too slow for that? How would it compare with using a standalone Java application--perhaps accessed from the Servlet via RMI? I guess using JNI with C++ in a standalone application would be the fastest, though a bit more complex to develop. I know it is a difficult question, but what is the most practical solution that strikes a balance between ease-of-programming and speed?
3). Can the J2EE 1.4 Application Server be used for running the presentation tier (Servlets and HTML) internally on our intranet? According to my testing, it seems to work, but is it a practical solution to use it this way?
4). I am running Tomcat between our inner and outer firewalls. The database would of course be completely inside both firewalls. Should the J2EE (or other) Application Server also be in the so-called 'dmz' with Tomcat? Should it be on the same physical server machine as Tomcat?
5). Can Tomcat be used externally without the Apache Web Server? Remember, our solution is based on Servlets and a single Applet-embedded HTML page, so high volume HTML generation isn't necessary. Are there any pros/cons or security issues with running a standalone Tomcat?
So far I've got Tomcat and the J2EE Application Server running and have tested my small Servlet /Applet test solution on both. Both servers work fine, although I haven't tested any Enterprise Beans on the application server yet. I'd really appreciate if anyone more experienced than I can comment on my design, answer some of my questions, and/or give me some advice or insights before I start full-scale development. Thanks for your help,
Regards,
Itchy

I can give my opinion on some of these questions and a resource for the others.
<question>
1). Is the J2EE 1.4 Application Server a good production solution for the conditions that I described
Or is it better to invest in a commercial product like Sun Java System Application Server 7 ? Or should I forget the application server concept completely?
</question>
Yes, the J2EE 1.4 app server is a good solution for these conditions. Specifically, I would use SJSAS PE 8.0 version or the J2EE SDK. They are free version that will meet your needs. You get the latest J2EE 1.4 platform features. As your needs grow you can transition to an enterprise version of the appserver (SE/EE). If you choose to go commercial please note that SJSAS 7.0 is a J2EE 1.3 platform.
<question>
2). If I use the J2EE Application Server, is this a good platform for running computational programs (via Session Beans)? Or is it too slow for that? How would it compare with using a standalone Java application--perhaps accessed from the Servlet via RMI? I guess using JNI with C++ in a standalone application would be the fastest, though a bit more complex to develop. I know it is a difficult question, but
what is the most practical solution that strikes a balance between ease-of-programming and speed?
</question>
I guess you will not know for sure unless you perform some bench mark tests. But my opinion is the ease of development features you gain by using an app server far out weigh any performance increases you may get using a native soluton. Also, it is not clear that a native solution would actually be faster, with the latest JIT compilers Java performance is comparable to C++, your milage may vary depending on your application.
<question>
3). Can the J2EE 1.4 Application Server be used for running the presentation tier (Servlets and HTML) internally on our intranet? According to my testing, it seems to work, but is it a practical solution to use it this way?
</question>
Yes I would use the app server for both your presentation tier and business tier.
As for the other issues you may want to look at the Java Enterprise Blue Prints located at: http://java.sun.com/j2ee/1.4/download.html#blueprints

SCCM 2012 Design Consideration / Advice

I have been tasked with a SCCM 2012 Design. We will be starting a fresh so I want to get this design right the first time and looking to you all on advice / Considerations I need to look at. Any help/feedback is appreciated.
Company Layout:
1 Main Office (Corporate Headquarters)
15+ Remote Locations with T1 Connections back to Main Office
3 Remote Locations with 100MB Connection to Main Office
2 Remote Locations with 10MB Connection to Main Office
2 Remote Locations with T3 Connections back to Main Office
300+ Remote Sales Rep (Work From home, coffee shops, etc...)
Approxamitly 3500 Clients throughout the organization
What we want to accomplish with SCCM:
Hardware/Software Inventory
Computer Imaging & Users State Migration
Deploy Packages / Applications
Application Portal (Self Service)
Windows/Software Updates (Even to Remote Sales Reps)
Manage Mobile Devices
What are your thoughts on the design? Do we run SQL on the CAS/Primary Site Servers or do we run it on a separate server?
Main Office = CAS (Probably Don't need), & Primary Site, & a Distribution Point for Internet Based Clients.
Primary Site Roles:
Site Server
Component Server
SMS Provider
Site System
Site Database Server
Application Catalog Web Service Point
Application Catalog Website Point
Distribution Point
Management Point
Software Update Point
State Migration Point
Fallback Status Point
Remote Offices do I do all Secondary Sites or Mix and match DP or do I make some of them Primary Sites?
Secondary Site Roles:
Site Server
Component Server
SMS Provider
Site System
Site Database Server
Management Point
Distribution Point
Software Update Service
State Migration Point
Fallback Status Point
Also do you agree with the specs I am thinking for each server role?
CAS
8 cores (Intel Xeon 5504 or comparable CPU)
32 GB of RAM
500 GB of disk space
Primary
4 cores (Intel Xeon 5140 or comparable CPU)
16 GB of RAM
500 GB of hard disk space
Secondary Site
4 cores (Intel Xeon 5140 or comparable CPU)
8 GB of RAM
200 GB of hard disk space
Distribution Points
2 cores (Intel Xeon 5140 or comparable CPU)
8 GB of RAM
200 GB of hard disk space

Based on that you'll have a total of approx. 3500 clients in your organization I do not see the immediate requirements of secondary sites but if you have sites with approx. 500 users a secondary site is a good idea.
IOPS is the most important thing when looking at hardware requirements for a site server due to it being SQL intensive. And it is actually only the database file storage that requires high IOPS. Due to that measuring IOPS is more of an art than science I
cant give you any numbers but SSD drives is nice to have :)
Based on your list of hardware I guess you've found
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh846235.aspx and
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg682077.aspx#BKMK_SupConfigClientNumbers
As you wrote and that other has written, do not use a CAS for this scenario.
If you can pull of some SSDs I would say something like
120 GB non-SSD for OS (remember, that pagefile needs some room too!)
80 GB non-SSD for Program Files
64 GB SSD for Database's
64 GB non-SSD for logs
500 GB non-SSD for Content Source
500 GB non-SSD for Content Library
Figures above is an estimate for your Primary Site Server based on the information you've given. I can not guarantee these figures due to forum post. The point of this post is to show you where you need SSD/lots of IOPS for good performance.
I usually recommend you to run your system as virtual machines due to the fact that you can use snapshots while performing upgrades and other maintenance tasks.
Tim Nilimaa | Blog: http://infoworks.tv | Twitter: @timnilimaa

DMS Designing structure

Hi Friends,
We are implementing DMS in our organization. Our file storing system is explained below.
1st level - Vendor name (like Nyro / Hydraulics / techno or code : A112 , A113, A114 etc...)
2nd level - Project name (like 1130 / 1131 / 1132 )
3rd level - Dept. (like Civil / electric/ admin)
4th levl - Incoming / Out going docs.
5th level - Type (like Drawings / docs / memos)
We want to give authorization to one group combination of levels like in 1st level - Nyro, 2nd level- A2, 3rd level -3rd level - admin, so on...our requirement is to store documents at various levels along with authorization.
our requirement is not to have individual doc. authorization, which we can do on each document on authorization tab assigning user / user group.
We need to send the work flow item to different set of persons on storage of document on each level on each status. Like if we store doc. for Nyro - 1130 - civil - incoming - Drawings (considering livels of above example) work flow should go to A1 goup other wise with to another group.
We can do this with classification (by creating characteristics / class and attaching to doc. type) but I can't have authorization at individual class or characteristic , i.e. I can control at doc. type only. Since we have three characters for doc. type code we need to make many doc. types considering above scenario.
If we use three characters of doc. type, lab office or authorization group can be used for other levels but we can't send work flow item.
By using Document structure we can make BOM by linking the two or more docs. with qty.
Is there any best way using SAP DMS ? Now we are implementing SAP R/3, not plans to invest in another software.
Regards,
Sai Krishna

Hi Sai,
It's definate that the reuirement not get addressed in standard environment. Better way write a abap programe with workflow with user gropu or levels predefined and irrespective of status the group will be intimated or communicated.
Discuss with abap person who knows workflow very well.
I hope this will be helpful one.
Regards,
Ravindra

Unable to see any content in NWBC even after designing structure through PFCG Menu

Hello Everyone
As this is abit new for me , It would be helpful if you can share your valuble inputs on this particular issue.
Even after the role is designed in PFCG, When trying to check the same through NWBC, there is no content that is visible.Only the webdynpro added are visible.
Can I know what is difference between adding a T-code and adding a Service( authorization default values ) in PFCG Role Menu ?
Will adding only Service wont server this purpose ?
Is it mandatory to Add T-code in role menu inorder to fetch data through NWBC or is there an alternate way available ?
Regards
Sunil

Hi Sunil,
I'd suggest you take a look at the help guide here Navigation Tree - SAP NetWeaver Business Client - SAP Library note the section:
For NWBC, you can insert the following objects in the menu tree:
Transaction code
Web Dynpro ABAP application
BSP application
Web address or file
Generic Web address (URL template)
Web client UI applications
So if you want something to be visible in the menu in NWBC you need it to be one of the above. In your screenshot you have added a Service Authorization (I think)... that won't show you anything in the menu.
Hth,
Simon

Query Designer - Structure - Sub-totals display

Hi
I am currently creating a structure with different levels and I woul like to have the subtotal I calculate in the various formulas in the structure below the data and not above like it is now.
For example now :
lvl1Total Net Sales
***lvl2Gross Sales
***lvl2Discounts
What I would like :
***lvl2Gross Sales
***lvl2Discounts
lvl1Total Net Sales
I tried in the query properties/ Row & Colums to change 'result position' but it does not work.
Anyone has a clue ?
Thank you very mucn
Edited by: Nico0 on Mar 4, 2009 4:39 PM

Your requirement is not clear how ever you can try this
Right click on the characterustic and select display tab in that select Supress result rows -> Never
It will give you the subtotals.
If that does not work out follow the link and see if that is what you want. If none is helpful please elaborate your requirement with some numbers.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/03/17f13a2f160f28e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Hope this helps.
~Abhijit

General Design Structure Advice

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for