Get-ChildItem on version 2.0 vs 3.0

Not sure if this has been discussed or is known, but I found an interesting issue when running Get-ChildItem on version 2.0 vs 3.0
So I have the simple command of
$files = Get-ChildItem -Path $Source -Recurse -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue -ErrorVariable myError
If $Source only contains 1 file, then $files is of type System.IO.FileInfo, whereas, if there are more than one, it would be of type Syste.Array. I actually thought $files would always be a collection, no mater if there was one or multiple files, but obviously
I was wrong.
So with thinking it will always be a collection, I used $files.Count for my Write-Progress
Write-Progress -Activity "Backing up Files" -Status "File: $src-->$dest" -PercentComplete ($counter / $files.Count*100)
Everything on my machine worked and I am running version 3.0, so I put the script on a machine that was running 2.0 and the Write-Progress failed with cannot divide by zero..hmmmmm
So doing a little testing, I ran the Get-ChildItem command on version 2.0 and then did $files.Count which returned nothing due to $files being System.IO.FileInfo, and it doesn't have a property of Count, but if you run it on version 3.0 and then do $files.Count,
even though $files doesn't have a Count property when it is of type Syste.IO.FileInfo or System.IO.DirectoryInfo, it will return 1
If you find that my post has answered your question, please mark it as the answer. If you find my post to be helpful in anyway, please click vote as helpful.
Don't Retire Technet

In PowerShell 3.0 or later, you can check a .Count property on any value (even $null.Count); it was added along with the Member Enumeration feature.  This works for .Length as well.  If no property / field named Count or Length exists on the object,
PowerShell will enumerate it for you and return the number of objects
When you're needing to support PowerShell 2.0, you need to be more careful.
On a side note, use the syntax in Boe's last post, with the @() operator around the command that you ran.  There's a subtle difference between these two:
$files = @(dir DoesNotExist.txt -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue)
$temp = dir DoesNotExist.txt -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
$files2 = @($temp)
$files.Count # 0
$files2.Count # In PowerShell 2.0, this will be 1. In 3.0 or later, it's 0.
This is because there are technically two different kinds of Null values that the PowerShell engine recognizes:  actual null references, and a value called AutomationNull, which is used to represent a command which didn't output anything.  In PowerShell
2.0, when you assign the result of a command to a variable, it didn't keep track of whether the result was AutomationNull or not, resulting in this weird behavior.  3.0 and later correct this.
Here are a couple of other demonstrations of this in action:
$array1 = @($null)
$array2 = @([System.Management.Automation.Internal.AutomationNull]::Value)
$array1.Count # 1
$array2.Count # 0
function ReturnsNull { return $null }
function ReturnsNothing { }
$array1 = @(ReturnsNull)
$array2 = @(ReturnsNothing)
$array1.Count # 1
$array2.Count # 0

Similar Messages

  • Get-ChildItem Issue With Variable

    I hope some very clever person out there can resolve this without even thinking, however my brain seems to be blocked.
    $FileVersion
    = (Get-ChildItem
    C:\Windows\System32\drivers\somedriver.SYS).VersionInfo
    |
    Select-Object
    FileVersion
    If ($FileVersion
    -eq
    "2, 0, 0, 1") {Copy-Item
    -Force
    "C:\local\somedriver.SYS","C:\Windows\System32\drivers\somedriver.SYS"} 
    I have verified this and $FileVersion does in fact equal 2, 0, 0, 1 however starts as a formatted table.
    FileVersion
    2, 0, 0, 1
    I think it must be passing the variable as the whole table, I also tried adding in my if statement the value @{FileVersion=2, 0, 0, 1 however that also failed.
    Any ideas what I'm missing here?
    Many Thanks

    If the strings are not in the same format then the files are not the same.  Simple logic.  IF they are in the same format and compare exactly then the strings are identical.  Who cares what is in them?
    Comparing to equal will always work.  If they do not compare as equal you know the files are different.
    That is all. That is all I said.  No need to make more of it.
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    You never answered how you're getting this string. Again, as I've said in more than one post now, if you're using .VersionInfo.FileVersion, that string is not accurate for a significant number of files (especially Microsoft files).
    You are correct when you say that if the strings don't match they're not the same. But you're forgetting that the strings may be the same and yet the file isn't the same. To me, that's a big deal. If you're cataloging file versions, your information could
    be incorrect.
    Here's a scenario:
    1. I check the 'mshtml.dll' VersionInfo.FileVersion today. It reports back that it is '11.00.9600.16410 (winblue_gdr.130923-1706)'.
    It is actually at version '11.0.9600.16476' (which can be confirmed by using Explorer or by combining the File*Part
    properties as in previous posts).
    2. An Internet Explorer patch comes along that updates the file to '11.0.9600.16482' (something higher than 16476)
    3. I check the version of the file again using the VersionInfo.FileVersion property. It reports back '11.00.9600.16410
    (winblue_gdr.130923-1706)', which is the same thing it showed before the patch. The file is obviously different, but the FileVersion property is reporting that it hasn't changed.
    So, if you're using that property, you will miss file changes on a significant number of files. 'mshtml.dll' is just one example. Go back and read my example to get a list of DLLs
    from system32 that are affected by this (remember, you will get some false positives).
    If you're combining the File*Part properties (which is what both Bill and I do), then the version will always be in a known format, and then all of the stuff you said about not being
    able to compare them is simply not correct.
    So, how are you proposing that someone gets a file's version from PowerShell?

  • Get-ChildItem with -LiteralPath is throwing "The specified wildcard character pattern is not valid" when filenames contain brackets

    I'm trying to get a list of folders in a hierarchy that don't contain any mp3 files. (The goal here is to eventually clean up all the "empty" folders that only have album art, thumbs.db, desktop.ini, etc. files left). So I wrote a quick PowerShell
    command to try to do this. But it doesn't seem to be working.
    I already checked out this thread <Get-ChildItem
    SomeFile[].txt occurs error because of the [brackets]: "specified wildcard pattern not valid"> and I think I'm using LiteralPath correctly. Any other hints for troubleshooting this problem? Here's the command I'm using.
    Get-ChildItem -Recurse -Directory | ?{
    @( @(Get-ChildItem -LiteralPath $_.FullName -Recurse) | ?{
    $_.Extension -eq ".mp3"}).Count -eq 0 }
    This is on the latest version of PowerShell found in Windows Technical Preview.

    Fair enough, but it still doesn't answer the original question- why isn't this working with -LiteralPath when the path contains brackets? 
    Get-ChildItem -Recurse -Directory | ?{
    @( @(Get-ChildItem -LiteralPath $_.FullName -Recurse) | ?{
    $_.Extension -eq ".mp3"}).Count -eq 0 }
    Thanks,
    Ben

  • Get-Childitem with Get-FileHash Info

    Hello,
    I have been able run the following script to get File names in a Recurse folders, although I'm looking to use Get-Filehast too, although I'm not sure or unable to tag this on the end of this script File-filehast info.  could you advise.
    my current Get-Childitem script
    get-childitem'\\folder1\folder2\folder3'-recurse|
    Add-Member
    -MemberTypeScriptProperty-NameVersion-Value{
    $this
    .VersionInfo.ProductVersion
    -PassThru|
    select-object
    DirectoryName,Name,Version,LastWriteTime,Length|where{
    $_.DirectoryName
    -ne$NULL}

    Hi I'm outputting to a text file, which I'm then importing into a database, although I have the following objects
    of which I looking to get also hash (Algorithm SHA256) file values as well.  Thanks
    ( DirectoryName,Name,Version,LastWriteTime,Length
    my code is this & screen print from PowerShell
    get-childitem'\\ServerShare\Folder1\Folder2\FolderData'-recurse|
    Add-Member
    -MemberTypeScriptProperty-NameVersion-Value{
    $this
    .VersionInfo.ProductVersion
    -PassThru|
    select-object
    DirectoryName,Name,Version,LastWriteTime,Length|where{
    $_.DirectoryName
    -ne$NULL}
    |Export-Csv-PathC:\folder0\data1.txt
     

  • Inconsistency between get-childitem -include and -exclude parameters

    Hi,
    Powershell 2.0
    Does anyone else consider this a minor design bug in the Get-ChildItem command?  
    # create dummy files
    "a","b","c" | % {$null | out-file "c:\temp\$_.txt"}
    # this "fails", returns nothing
    get-childitem c:\temp -include a*,b*
    # this "works", returns desired files
    get-childitem c:\temp\* -include a*,b*
    # this "works", excludes undesired files
    get-childitem c:\temp -exclude a*,b*
    # this "fails", excludes undesired files BUT RECURSES sub-directories
    get-childitem c:\temp\* -exclude a*,b*
    I'm writing a wrapper script around the GCI cmdlet, but the inconsistency between the two parameters is problematic.  My end user will surely just type a path for the path parameter, then wonder why -include returned nothing.  I can't unconditionally
    add an asterisk to the path parameter, since that messes up the exclude output.
    I'm just wondering why Microsoft didn't make the parameter interaction consistent???  
    # includes desired files in the specified path
    get-childitem -path c:\temp -include a*,b*
    # excludes undesired files in the specified path
    get-childitem -path c:\temp -exclude a*,b*
    # combine both options
    get-childitem -path c:\temp -include a*,b* -exclude *.log,*.tmp
    # same as above, the asterisk doesn't matter
    get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -include a*,b*
    get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -exclude a*,b*
    get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -include a*,b* -exclude *.log,*.tmp
    # same as above, but explicitly recurse if that's what you want
    get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -include a*,b* -recurse
    get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -exclude a*,b* -recurse
    get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -include a*,b* -exclude *.log,*tmp -recurse
    If I execute the "naked" get-childitem command, the asterisk doesn't matter...
    # same results
    get-childitem c:\temp
    get-chileitem c:\temp\*
    If this isn't considered a bug, can you explain why the inconsistency between the two parameters when combined with the -path parameter?
    Thanks,
    Scott

    The Get-ChildItem cmdlet syntax is horrific for advanced use. It's not a bug in the classic sense, so you shouldn't call it that. However, feel free to call it awful, ugly, disastrous, or any other deprecatory adjective you like - it really is
    nasty.
    Get-ChildItem's unusual behavior is rooted in one of the more 'intense' dialogues between developers and users in the beta period. Here's how I recall it working out; some details are a bit fuzzy for me at this point.
    Get-ChildItem's original design was as a tool for enumerating items in a namespace -
    similar to but not equivalent to dir and
    ls. The syntax and usage was going to conform to standard PowerShell (Monad at the time) guidelines.
    In a nutshell, what this means is that the Path parameter would have truly just meant Path - it would not have been usable as a combination path specification and result filter, which it is now. In other words
    (1) dir c:\temp
    means you wanted to return children of the container c:\temp
    (2) dir c:\temp\*
    means you wanted to return children of all containers inside
    c:\temp. With (2), you would never get c:\tmp\a.txt returned, since a.txt is not a container.
    There are reasons that this was a good idea. The parameter names and filtering behavior was consistent with the evolving PowerShell design standards, and best of all the tool would be straightforward to stub in for use by namespace
    providers consistently.
    However, this produced a lot of heated discussion. A rational, orthogonal tool would not allow the convenience we get with the dir command for doing things like this:
    (3) dir c:\tmp\a*.txt
    Possibly more important was the "crash" factor.  It's so instinctive for admins to do things like (3) that our fingers do the typing when we list directories, and the instant failure or worse, weird, dissonant output we would get with a more pure Path
    parameter is exactly like slamming into a brick wall.
    At this point, I get a little fuzzy about the details, but I believe the Get-ChildItem syntax was settled on as a compromise that wouldn't derail people expecting files when they do (3), but would still allow more complex use.  I think that this
    is done essentially by treating all files as though they are containers for themselves. This saves a lot of pain in basic use, but introduces other pain for advanced use.
    This may shed some light on why the tool is a bit twisted, but it doesn't do a lot to help with your particular wrapping problem. You'll almost certainly need to do some more complicated things in attempting to wrap up Get-ChildItem. Can you describe some
    details of what your intent is with the wrapper? What kind of searches by what kind of users, maybe? With those details, it's likely people can point out some specific approaches that can give more consistent results.

  • How to get all previous versions page contents of a publishing page using SharePoint Client Object Model 2010

    How to get all previous versions page contents and other field values of a publishing page using SharePoint Client Object Model 2010?
    Thanks,
    Osmita

    Hi Osmita,
    Greetings.
    Here are the links that helps you. It has code attached to it.
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/a0d2ab40-99ba-4368-8505-1dc559ef6469/get-content-of-previous-version-of-page-sharepoint-2010?forum=sharepointgeneralprevious
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/faaf419f-997e-4150-9911-48cc375c3b46/how-to-get-previous-published-versions-of-publishing-pages-in-sharepoint-2010?forum=sharepointdevelopmentprevious
    Please remember to click 'Mark as Answer' on the answer if it helps you

  • My ITunes got corrupted and I kept getting a message when updating iTunes64msi missing so I uninstalled all files and I thought I removed all registry values but  when reinstalling I get an older version is installed and cannot be removed. I need a soluti

    My ITunes got corrupted and I kept getting a message when updating iTunes64msi missing so I uninstalled all files and I thought I removed all registry values but  when reinstalling I get an older version is installed and cannot be removed. I need a solution.

    (1) Download the Windows Installer CleanUp utility installer file (msicuu2.exe) from the following Major Geeks page (use one of the links under the "DOWNLOAD LOCATIONS" thingy on the Major Geeks page):
    http://majorgeeks.com/download.php?det=4459
    (2) Doubleclick the msicuu2.exe file and follow the prompts to install the Windows Installer CleanUp utility. (If you're on a Windows Vista or Windows 7 system and you get a Code 800A0046 error message when doubleclicking the msicuu2.exe file, try instead right-clicking on the msicuu2.exe file and selecting "Run as administrator".)
    (3) In your Start menu click All Programs and then click Windows Install Clean Up. The Windows Installer CleanUp utility window appears, listing software that is currently installed on your computer.
    (4) In the list of programs that appears in CleanUp, select any Bonjour entries and click "Remove", as per the following screenshot:
    (5) Quit out of CleanUp, restart the PC and try another iTunes install. Does it go through properly this time?

  • How to get the last version of flash in MSI format automatically?

    How to get the last version of flash in MSI format automatically?
    Roberto Neigenfind
    Bravo Tecnologia
    www.bravotecnologia.com.br

    Hi Barbara,
    Flash Professional CS5.5 is a 32-bit application which can be installed on computers with either 32-bit or 64-bit operating systems.
    You can purchase this by Adobe's backward Licensing policy :
    " Adobe allows program members to order a current-version license but use a prior version. These members can contact Adobe Customer Service to request a serial number for the earlier version if they do not already have one. Prior-version software is available via ESD and can be purchased through standard resellers. The program member must follow all guidelines of the current-version EULA. "
    Please check the doc : http://www.adobe.com/volume-licensing/policies.html

  • It's happened twice in the last month- I suddenly can't open my Pages documents unless I get the new version (for $20!) What is going on??!!

    Some documents, but not others, that I've created/edited/printed and worked with JUST RECENTLY suddenly won't open UNLESS I get the new version of Pages (for $20!!) I just edited some of these a couple of days ago! I edited one, printed it, etc. Now I need to look at it again and it WON'T open! I "need the new version of Pages??! What if I don't want to suddenly shell out $20 to work with documents I made on the version I already have? And why do SOME documents now look different (in a new style) while others look like they always have, and function normally?

    You have 2 versions of Pages on your Mac.
    Pages 5.2 is in your Applications folder.
    Pages '09/'08 is in your Applications/iWork folder.
    You are alternately opening the wrong versions.
    Pages '09/'08 can not open Pages 5 files and you will get the warning that you need a newer version.
    Pages 5.2 can open Pages '09 files but may damage/alter them. It can not open Pages '08 files at all.
    Older versions of Pages 5 can not open files from later versions of Pages 5.
    Once opened and saved in Pages 5 the Pages '09 files can not be opened in Pages '09.
    Anything that is saved to iCloud and opened in a newer version of Pages is also converted to Pages 5 files.
    All Pages files no matter what version and incompatibility have the same extension .pages.
    Pages 5 files are now only compatible with themselves on a very restricted set of hardware, software and Operating Systems and will not transfer correctly on any other server software than iCloud.
    Apple has removed almost 100 features from Pages 5 and added many bugs:
    http://www.freeforum101.com/iworktipsntrick/viewforum.php?f=22&sid=3527487677f0c 6fa05b6297cd00f8eb9&mforum=iworktipsntrick
    Peter

  • I downloaded a Firefox notice and now I get Error:Platform version 1.9.2.3 is not compatible with MinVersion =1.9.2.4 MaxVersion

    I downloaded a Firefox notice and now I get Error:Platform version 1.9.2.3 is not compatible with MinVersion>=1.9.2.4 MaxVersion

    Do a clean reinstall and download a fresh Firefox copy from http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/all.html and save the file to the desktop.
    Uninstall your current Firefox version and remove the Firefox program folder before installing that copy of the Firefox installer.
    It is important to delete the Firefox program folder to remove all the files and make sure that there are no problems with files that were leftover after uninstalling.
    You can skip the step to create a new profile, that is not necessary for this issue.
    See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Standard_diagnostic_-_Firefox#Clean_reinstall

  • After installing Firefox 5.0 and attempting to open the browser I get: Error: Platform Version '2.0.1' is not compatible with MinVersion = 5.0 MaxVersion = 5.0 At the top of the message is Yul Runner

    While installing Firefox 5.0 and attempting to open the browser I get: Error: Platform Version '2.0.1' is not compatible with MinVersion > = 5.0 MaxVersion < = 5.0
    Above the message in the border was XULRunner

    That can happen if the updater wasn't able to update (replace) all the files in the Firefox program folder (C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\).
    Download a fresh Firefox copy and save the file to the desktop.
    * Firefox 5.0.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
    * Uninstall your current Firefox version.
    * Do not remove personal data when you uninstall the current version.
    Remove the Firefox program folder before installing that newly downloaded copy of the Firefox installer.
    * It is important to delete the Firefox program folder to remove all the files and make sure that there are no problems with files that were leftover after uninstalling.
    Your bookmarks and other profile data are stored elsewhere in the [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox Firefox Profile Folder] and won't be affected by a reinstall, but make sure that you do not select to remove personal data if you uninstall Firefox.

  • Where can I get an older version of iMovie?

    I recently upgraded to Leopard and after the first attempt some of the programs didn't perform properly. Long story short, the Geniuses at the Mac store told me to do an archive install but I was unable to (not enough hard drive space) and had to do a clean install. I had backed up all of my documents and files but lost all of my programs. Not a big deal as most were old and needed to be upgraded anyway.
    The problem: I bought iLife 08 from the Mac store and installed it. Everything installed properly except for iMovie. It wouldn't install because my video card isn't sufficient to run iMovie 08 (or something like that).
    I don't remember what version was on previously, but it worked great with Tiger. I have a 15 month old and we are constantly making camcorder movies and I really need an operable version of iMovie.
    Since I bought iLife 08 I don't feel like I should have to buy any more software. I should be able to get an older version under the 08 license, IMO.
    Anyone have any suggestions as to how to solve this problem? Thanks in advance!
    Don Cash
    Hardware Overview:
    Model Name: iBook G4
    Model Identifier: PowerBook6,5
    Processor Name: PowerPC G4 (1.1)
    Processor Speed: 1.07 GHz
    Number Of CPUs: 1
    L2 Cache (per CPU): 512 KB
    Memory: 512 MB
    Bus Speed: 133 MHz
    Boot ROM Version: 4.8.5f0

    AS an iLife 08 owner, you can get a free download of iMovie 6 here.
    http://www.apple.com/support/imovie/
    See bottom right of page for iMovie HD download.

  • Get an older version of GarageBand iOS?

    How do I get an older version of GarageBand for iOS (pre 2.0.1)? Other than this method :
    https://sites.google.com/site/appleclubfhs/support/advice-and-articles/app-store -downloading-older-versions-of-apps-ios
    I have been all over that article trying to figure this issue out. The problem for me is, my app store, my wife's app store, my friend's app stores, etc. all have updated versions of GarageBand iOS and we have updated iOS to 7. I can't downgrade to iOS 6 any longer. I've asked a friend to trade me his old iPad for my newer one! And on and on to no avail.
    Is there a way I can download a pre - 2.0.1 version of GarageBand iOS from a 3rd party? Can the file be placed somewhere and then onto my Mac via iTunes? I have contacted app store support about this. They offered to refund my $4.99, but cannot give me my also purchased (on a different account and updated there as well) old version of GB iOS.
    I have a compatibility issue between the latest GB for iOS and Logic Pro 9 on the Mac. LP 9 will not open the latest version of GB iOS. I cannot download LP 10 bc my 2007 MP is 32-bit EFI. I'm not comfortable w/ the hacks for getting Mavericks, etc. as I'm not computer savvy. I'm a songwriter who wants to write and record as simply as possible. My current set-up runs like a tank. GB iOS is great for getting ideas down when on the road. Then I flesh things out on the Mac in LP and add the audio tracks there as well.
    Anyone know a workaround for opening GB iOS in LP9? I don't want the audio BTW, just the MIDI. I can find the audio by show package contents, etc. but I can't see the MIDI info in the folder. Maybe my OSX won't recognize as I could possibly do this manually? When I unpack a pre-2.0.1 GB file on the Mac, I can see both the audio and the MIDI, but not on the new GB ".band" file. Any thoughts or ideas are welcomed. Thank you!
    Mac Pro 1,1 June 2007
    2x Quad Core 2.66 Ghz Intel Xeon
    16 GB RAM
    2 HD's
    Logic Pro 9.1.8
    Snow Leopard 10.6.8

    Thank you! Can you please explain? Can I still record in GB iOS and then use the MIDI synth app? Where is the MIDI synth app - on the iPad or Mac?  How do I get the MIDI info to the Mac - by iRig MIDI or USB? Please break down the process if you can and I will try it. Looks like great idea, I just need a little more info. Thanks!

  • Get an older version of GarageBand for iOS (pre 2.0.1)?

    How do I get an older version of GarageBand for iOS (pre 2.0.1)? Other than this method :
    https://sites.google.com/site/appleclubfhs/support/advice-and-articles/app-store -downloading-older-versions-of-apps-ios
    I have been all over that article trying to figure this issue out. The problem for me is, my app store, my wife's app store, my friend's app stores, etc. all have updated versions of GarageBand iOS and we have updated iOS to 7. I can't downgrade to iOS 6 any longer. I've asked a friend to trade me his old iPad for my newer one! And on and on to no avail.
    Is there a way I can download a pre - 2.0.1 version of GarageBand iOS from a 3rd party? Can the file be placed somewhere and then onto my Mac via iTunes? I have contacted app store support about this. They offered to refund my $4.99, but cannot give me my also purchased (on a different account and updated there as well) old version of GB iOS.
    I have a compatibility issue between the latest GB for iOS and Logic Pro 9 on the Mac. LP 9 will not open the latest version of GB iOS. I cannot download LP 10 bc my 2007 MP is 32-bit EFI. I'm not comfortable w/ the hacks for getting Mavericks, etc. as I'm not computer savvy. I'm a songwriter who wants to write and record as simply as possible. My current set-up runs like a tank. GB iOS is great for getting ideas down when on the road. Then I flesh things out on the Mac in LP and add the audio tracks there as well.
    Anyone know a workaround for opening GB 2.0.1 iOS in LP9? I don't want the audio BTW, just the MIDI. I can find the audio by show package contents, etc. but I can't see the MIDI info in the folder. Maybe my OSX won't recognize as I could possibly do this manually? When I unpack a pre-2.0.1 GB file on the Mac, I can see both the audio and the MIDI, but not on the new GB ".band" file. Any thoughts or ideas are welcomed. Thank you!
    Mac Pro 1,1 June 2007
    2x Quad Core 2.66 Ghz Intel Xeon
    16 GB RAM
    2 HD's
    Logic Pro 9.1.8
    Snow Leopard 10.6.8

    Thank you! Can you please explain? Can I still record in GB iOS and then use the MIDI synth app? Where is the MIDI synth app - on the iPad or Mac?  How do I get the MIDI info to the Mac - by iRig MIDI or USB? Please break down the process if you can and I will try it. Looks like great idea, I just need a little more info. Thanks!

  • I have a problem with my Internet Security and the new Firefox, where can I get the previous version which I had before my system crashed?

    Hi I use CA Internet Security Suite which checks ALL pages and searches, but it does not work with this version, also I wish to use Goggle Toolbar which ALSO does not work with this version where can I get the previous version? As my harddrive crashed I have had to install windows 7 and this version doesn't seem to allow me to change my homepage, why is this? Cheers Ernest

    You can get the latest version of Firefox 3.6 from http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html
    Mozilla are working to prevent Mac users with non-compatible systems from getting the notification about Firefox 4, and also not displaying the "Download Firefox 4" button on http://www.mozilla.com

Maybe you are looking for

  • Changing from 24"imac to MacBook Pro 17"

    Now I have ceased my wedding video business to concentrate on bringing up my 7 month old son would some kind soul please help. To make more space in our small house and reclaim the dining room table I am selling my 24" Imac and replacing it with a Ma

  • Path and JTree?

    Hi everybody !!! I would like to know how I can get the complete path of the JTree. I use the getLastSelectedPathComponent()) but it display only the folder. Do you know a method that can display the path of the folder? tree.addMouseListener(new Mous

  • How do I password secure some of my files

    How can I password protect my files

  • LWF getting deducted every month

    Hi, I am facing an issue in LWF. I have done the necessary configurations mentioned below V_T7INU1: Univ. Type: TLMH Univ. Grp: 11 Univ. Grp Text: LWF MAHARASHTRA Region: 13 Start date: 01/04/2010 End date: 31/12/9999 V_T7INU3: Univ. Type: TLMH Regio

  • Flex SDK 4.5 MPL download corrupt?

    I was downloading Flex SDK 4.5 MPL, the open source version, but the downloaded file was only about 13M bytes and not a valid zip archive. Anyone can check that? P.S. Where can I find MD5/SHA1 checksums to check the integrity?