Get response & slow performance

Internal authenticate method when the RSA 2K RSA key is used returns 256 bytes. The applet does not support the extended length. Because of it, the internal authenticate method returns 255 in the first launch. After the get response is called and the rest (1 byte) is returned. Get response function lasts unexpectedly slow. More than 300 ms. This code handle get response:
if (apdu.getCurrentState() != APDU.STATE_OUTGOING) {
                    apdu.setOutgoing();
               apdu.setOutgoingLength(length);
               apdu.sendBytesLong(tmpBuffer.data, remainingDataOffset, length);I am aware that in order to return the rest of the message, the array has to be iterated on the appropriate position (255). Is there any way how this can be optimized under the prerequisite that the extended length is not used?

This is just the extract of my code. There is a part of code in which I am checking if the command is GET RESPONSE.
Can you see in this code what makes the get response acts slow. In the second launch, only one bate is resturned. This
byte is at the offset 255 of the tmpBuffer.data variable
Extract from the process method:
The instance variables:
private static final byte INS_GET_RESPONSE = (byte) 0xC0;
private byte[] remainingDataLength;
     private byte[] remainingDataOffset;
     The constructor:
remainingDataLength = JCSystem.makeTransientByteArray((short) 2,
                    JCSystem.CLEAR_ON_DESELECT);
          remainingDataOffset = JCSystem.makeTransientByteArray((short) 2,
                    JCSystem.CLEAR_ON_DESELECT);
byte[] buffer = apdu.getBuffer();
          byte ins = buffer[OFFSET_INS];
          if (ins == INS_GET_RESPONSE) {
               if (Util.getShort(remainingDataLength, (short) 0) <= 0) {
                    ISOException.throwIt(SW_CONDITIONS_NOT_SATISFIED);
               sendData(apdu, Util.getShort(remainingDataLength, (short) 0));
               return;
          else {
               Util.setShort(remainingDataOffset, (short) 0, (short) 0);
               Util.setShort(remainingDataLength, (short) 0, (short) 0);
          }The called sendData method:
private void sendData(APDU apdu, short length) {
          short remainingDataOffsetTmp = Util.getShort(remainingDataOffset, (short) 0);
          short remainingDataLengthTemp = Util.getShort(remainingDataLength, (short) 0);
          if (length > RESPONSE_LENGTH) {
               if (apdu.getCurrentState() != APDU.STATE_OUTGOING) {
                    apdu.setOutgoing();
               apdu.setOutgoingLength(RESPONSE_LENGTH);
               apdu.sendBytesLong(tmpBuffer.data, remainingDataOffsetTmp, RESPONSE_LENGTH);
               remainingDataOffsetTmp += RESPONSE_LENGTH;
               remainingDataLengthTemp = (short) (length - RESPONSE_LENGTH);
               Util.setShort(remainingDataOffset, (short) 0, remainingDataOffsetTmp);
               Util.setShort(remainingDataLength, (short) 0, remainingDataLengthTemp);
               ISOException
                         .throwIt((short) (ISO7816Ext.SW_MORE_DATA + ((remainingDataLengthTemp > RESPONSE_LENGTH) ? RESPONSE_LENGTH
                                   : remainingDataLengthTemp)));
          else if (length > 0 && length <= RESPONSE_LENGTH) {
               if (apdu.getCurrentState() != APDU.STATE_OUTGOING) {
                    apdu.setOutgoing();
               apdu.setOutgoingLength(length);
               apdu.sendBytesLong(tmpBuffer.data, remainingDataOffsetTmp, length);
               Util.setShort(remainingDataOffset, (short) 0, (short) 0);
               Util.setShort(remainingDataLength, (short) 0, (short) 0);
     }

Similar Messages

  • ABAP-HR GET-PERAS , SlOW PERFORMANCE

    Hi All,
    I am using PNPCE LDB and while fetching records it takes lot of time .As per ST05 , time is taken by standard select statements inside GET PERAS.
    Can any one advice , what should we do so that performance increases .
    Should I use normal select statement.Will that help

    Hi Ravi,
    There is no macro which can retrieve the record based on AEDTM. One more thing to say is statement provide ...endprovide statement can be used and there would be no performance issue if i am not wrong. Anyway try this code.
    tables: pa0001, pernr.
    infotypes : 0001.
    data : begin of itab occurs 0,
           pernr like pa0001-pernr,
           aedtm like pa0001-aedtm,
           end of itab.
    data : v_aedtm type pa0001-aedtm.
    start-of-selection.
    v_aedtm = sy-datum - 1.
    get pernr.
    provide * from p0001 between pn-begda and pn-endda.
    if p0001-aedtm = v_aedtm.
    move : p0001-pernr to itab-pernr,
           p0001-aedtm to itab-aedtm.
           append itab.
    endif.
    endprovide.
    end-of-selection.
    loop at itab.
    write :/ itab-pernr, itab-aedtm.
    endloop.
    Regards,
    Kranthi

  • I am getting very slow performance from my i7, 27" iMac and it is very hot to the touch. Is this a sign of an imminent failure coming?

    I get the colour wheel constantly after most clicks of the mouse and the unit is very hot causing the fan to start running for simple operations like checking email. Just wondering if anybody had any suggestions.
    Thanks...

    If you have more than ten or so files or folders on your Desktop, move them, temporarily at least, somewhere else in your home folder.
    Disconnect all wired peripherals except keyboard, mouse, and monitor, if applicable. Launch the usual set of applications you use when you notice the slowdown.
    Step 1
    Launch the Activity Monitor application in any of the following ways:
    ☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
    ☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
    ☞ If you’re running Mac OS X 10.7 or later, open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Activity Monitor in the page that opens.
    Select the CPU tab.
    Select All Processes from the menu in the toolbar, if not already selected.
    Click the heading of the % CPU column in the process table to sort the entries by CPU usage. You may have to click it twice to get the highest value at the top. What is it, and what is the process? Also post the values for % User, % System, and % Idle at the bottom of the window.
    Select the System Memory tab. What values are shown in the bottom part of the window for Page outs and Swap used?
    Step 2
    Launch the Console application in the same way as above, and select “kernel.log” from the file list. Post the dozen or so most recent messages in the log — the text, please, not a screenshot.
    If there are runs of repeated messages, please post only one example of each. Do not post many repetitions of the same message.

  • Sudden extreme slow performance

    I have run Tiger on this machine for about 6 months with no problems. In the last few weeks everything has started slowing down noticably. The hard disk is running ragged, constantly reading/writing, from looking at the cpu monitor it seems like the computer is not actually using it's ram and is just reading and writing. I tried clearing caches and that worked for a few hours but the machine now seems to lock up after a few hours use. I get to the point where i cannot open menus, switch programs, or even force quit or restart. Everything locks up - spinning beachball - and the hard disk is left constantly writing. I have 9 -15Gb free out of 40Gb on the disk - i assume this is enough. Playing music and safari is no problem. But I am using iphoto and photoshop as well as other programs in the background. This was never previously a problem and ran smoothly. I know it's fairly vague but if anyone can help..

    Hi, Ben.
    Thanks. However, it would help to see some of the specific data points from the instructions in those FAQs. Specifically:
    1. You wrote: "(the pageins/outs are about equal) but i'm getting REALLY slow performance across the board. "It still sounds like it is "thrashing."1.1. Did you check the pagesin/pageouts per second as described in my "Problems from insufficient RAM and free hard disk space" FAQ? The per-second values can only be found using top as described therein.
    1.2. Did you check for a runaway process in Activity Monitor per the "Troubleshooting" section in my "Tuning Mac OS X Performance" FAQ?.
    The activity you describe (beach ball, heavy disk writing) has to be coming from somewhere, so checking Activity Monitor as I describe in that FAQ should tell you. Find the process consuming the most %CPU as instructed in the FAQ. Post back the result, i.e. the process name.2. You wrote: "It seems to lock itself up with the hard disk clicking and crunching. Is it possible the hard disk is giving up and so is writing at a very slow speed??? "To check this, see my "Resolving Disk, Permission, and Cache Corruption" FAQ:2.1. Perform at least Steps 1-3 of the Procedure section therein in the order specified.
    2.2. Also, review the section therein on "Bad Sectors" to see if the "clicking and crunching" sounds you are hearing are similar to those that generally indicate bad sectors.3. If the disk checks out OK per point 2 above, and depending on what you find in point 1.2 above, the process may be an errant Startup or Login Item. My "Troubleshooting Startup and Login Items" FAQ can help you pin that down if such an item is causing the problem.
    Good luck!
    Dr. Smoke
    Author: Troubleshooting Mac® OS X
    Note: The information provided in the link(s) above is freely available. However, because I own The X Lab™, a commercial Web site to which some of these links point, the Apple Discussions Terms of Use require I include the following disclosure statement with this post:
    I may receive some form of compensation, financial or otherwise, from my recommendation or link.

  • Slow performance from Premiere Elements 10

    Hi guys,
    I recently purchased Premiere Elements and Photoshop Elements 10 to edit some wedding video.  I am experiencing some slow performance with the software (and random lockups for that matter).  My CPU usage shows nearly nil when using the program and with IE with multiple tabs open at the moment and the Premiere Elements open, I am showing that I still have about 5GB of RAM free.  However, I am still getting some slow performance from the software with random lockups.  The video came from a sony HDR-CX700V camera, it is all 1080P video and there is about 3 hours worth of footage added to my current project.  I imported the footage by just dragging and dropping the video folder contents into the "Project" tab within the program.
    An example of the slow performance I get is this.  I added a Title card to start before the video.  When I hit play to see how it looks, the preview screen shows nothing, but you can see the time scrolling, then the video suddenly starts, but the video is really choppy.  I also had a heck of a time just adding that title card, as when I did it the program crashed once and locked up a couple of times.  Any ideas how I can fix this?  What other information would you need to help me further troubleshoot the problem?
    My system is has an i7-720 with 8GB of RAM and an NVIDIA GTX260M with the latest driver from NVIDIA. 
    TIA guys!

    One - your project must match your video... if you have a red line over the timeline immediately after importing the video, your project is wrong
    Read Bill Hunt on a file type as WRAPPER http://forums.adobe.com/thread/440037
    What is a CODEC... a Primer http://forums.adobe.com/thread/546811
    What CODEC is INSIDE that file? http://forums.adobe.com/thread/440037
    Report back with the codec details of your file, use the programs below... a screen shot works well to SHOW people what you are doing
    For PC http://www.headbands.com/gspot/ or http://mediainfo.sourceforge.net/en
    For Mac http://mediainspector.massanti.com/
    http://blogs.adobe.com/premiereprotraining/2011/02/red-yellow-and-green-render-bars.html
    If you have a red line over the timeline after importing a video and before adding any effects... your project is wrong for your video... read above about codecs
    Once you know exactly what it is you are editing, report back with that information... and your project setting, and if there is a red line above the video in the timeline, which indicates a mismatch between video and project
    Two - how many hard drives do you have, and how is your project configured?
    My 3 hard drives to edit AVCHD are configured as...
    1 - 320Gig Boot for Win7 64bit Pro and all program installs
    2 - 320Gig data for Win7 paging swap file and video project files
    When I create a project on #2 drive, the various work files follow,
    so my boot drive is not used for the media cache folder and files
    3 - 1Terabyte data for all video files... input & output files (*)
    (*) for 4 drives, drive 3 all source files & drive 4 all output files
    Search Microsoft to find out how to redirect your Windows paging swap file
    http://search.microsoft.com/search.aspx?mkt=en-US&setlang=en-US

  • Slow performance on 11g

    Hi ,
    Recently we have migrated our database from 10g to 11.2.0.2 enterprise edition .
    Comparing with 10g , we are getting very slow performance on 11g .
    can anyone suggest me how to to tune this migrated database.
    Also Please suggest me the version of TOMCAT server compatible with 11g
    Thanx in advance....

    Start looking at your top N SQL.
    Even if there are a number of statements whose performance has degraded thanks to the upgrade, you might as well start with the worst performing SQL.
    If you have some performance reports from the period before upgrade then these could be used as comparison.
    If you preserved any execution plans from before the upgrade, these might come in useful as quick fixes to any specific statement issues.
    If you still have plans in AWR from before the upgrade, then
    "Read by other session" is a typical symptom of inefficient execution plan issues where multiple query executions are requesting the same data and it is not in the cache.
    "db file parallel read" is often a symptom of index prefetching - from your top SQL check statements doing an index full scan, particularly if they didn't use to.
    See threads following threads for SQL tuning:
    [url https://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=863295]How to post a sql tuning request
    [url https://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=1812597]When your query takes too long
    So, in summary, check out your top N SQL, check which queries are doing most "read by other sessions", double check plans with "db file parallel read".
    You might find a common cause affecting a number of statments or you might just find a couple of queries who are stressing you out and whose execution plan needs some post-upgrade TLC (which is normal).

  • Slow Performance On Mac Pro 12-Core

    Hello Everyone,
    I just recently purchased a 2012 Mac pro 12-Core and i have been getting unbelievabley slow performance with it. I am using Premiere Pro CS6 and it seems that the footage can sometimes get a bit laggy at times and not play back smoothly, sometimes rendering can take a bit of time as well. However here are the specs of my system:
    Mac Pro 12-Core 2.4GHz (2.67GHz Turbo Boost)
    40GB of Ram
    ATI 5770 Graphics Card
    1TB scratch disk (with a user on the drive that i can boot into)
    OCZ 120GB Vertex 3 SSD OS/APPS drive
    First question i would like to get answered once and for all.. Did i make a bad decision by purchasing a computer with such a slow clock speed (2.4GHz)?? I figured since The new editing software is switching to 64bit it shouldn't depend on clock speed anymore? (i just want to be sure that i purchased a more than capable machine) However i will be buying a Samsung 840 Pro Series 256GB SSD Drive for Scratch within the month. (I dont have the budget to buy a Raid controller yet to utilize 6GB/s transfer speeds, so 1 Fast SSD drive will have to do for now)
    I should mention the current SSD drive im on right now only has 13GB remaining, would that affect performance? Also, my 1Tb media drive is filled up with CRAP from my previous computer (Migration transferred EVERYTHING to that drive, only 120GB remains) would that drive with the media im working with affect performance too? Also just as a test, i took some footage from my GoPro Hero 3 camera and put it on my SSD to see if that would eliminate the lag, but still lag was present in Premiere.. (the footage was in a crappy .M4P format, so that may have affected it, but I dont know)
    Any suggestions are greatly appreciated!
    -Thanks in Advance!

    The new editing software is switching to 64bit it shouldn't depend on clock speed anymore?
    Wrong, clock speed is everything.
    I should mention the current SSD drive im on right now only has 13GB remaining, would that affect performance?
    No, not really.
    Also, my 1Tb media drive is filled up with CRAP from my previous computer (Migration transferred EVERYTHING to that drive, only 120GB remains) would that drive with the media im working with affect performance too?
    When fill rates go up, performance goes down. With almost 90% fill rate, the disk performs only at around 50% of a new disk.
    Two disks is absolute bare minimum, and your cores will constantly be waiting for the disks to read or write data, sitting idle most of the time.
    Also just as a test, i took some footage from my GoPro Hero 3 camera and put it on my SSD to see if that would eliminate the lag, but still lag was present in Premiere..
    GoPro material requires a very fast computer, which yours is not with the low clock speed, outdated E5620 CPU's, only two disks, and a non-CUDA capable video card.
    Take a look at the PPBM5 Benchmark and look at the system at rank # 854, which is a MacPro, very similar to your system, dual E5620, AMD video card, less memory but uses three disks.
    So, your system would be around the same rank as the one above, among the slowest 25% of all systems and something like 10 - 15 times slower than a fast system. You tax your system to the extreme with the GoPro Hero3 material, and the consequence is the slow performance you see.
    Sorry, not much you can do, other than get a new system. If you sell it now, it may get you a price, good enough to get a much faster Windows system and maybe even keep the change.  Simply said, you bought a MacPro for € 3.5 K, sell it for € 3 K, buy a PC for € 2.5 K that is around 5-6 times faster and your loss is recovered.
    However i will be buying a Samsung 840 Pro Series 256GB SSD Drive for Scratch within the month
    What a pity the MacPro does not have SATA 6G ports, only SATA 3G, because then that SSD will run at almost half speed.

  • Massively Slow Performance

    When using the QueueBrowser I am getting massively slow performance. This is happening in two ways - with a selector and without.
    When no selector is used to get a list of all messages currently on the Queue (depth = 3000) it can take over a minute to go through the enumeration. When using a selector with the message id as the criteria the performance barely improves over the time taken to enumerate over the entire queue
    Does anyone know how I can improve his performance or what causes it to be so slow?
    Thanks in advance,
    Ian

    Try repair your permissions, and while you are at it, do a disk verify.
    Also you may want to upgrade to 1 or 2 GB of RAM, it helps big time.
    I have had my Macbook for 2 years and its still as fast as day one.

  • Getting slow performance with -webkit-box-shadow [2.5.1]

    Hello, I just updated to the lastest Air version and I'm getting slow performance on my app when using this new css3 property just added, anyone else has the same problem?

    Thanks for your reply. I have actually found a way to fix the problem and it had nothing to do with the subvi's in my application (well almost nothing . The first thing I tried doing was taking out the display local variables which displayed lockin data on 3 screens of my application into 1 separate while loop and replacing the Lockin driver code with global variables which had only the data I wanted to display. This helped a little bit but here's what fixed my problem completely.
    When I created 2 lockin SubVIs I forgot to go into File->VI Properties->Execution and there select Time critical priority and in the other option drop down list: data acquisition.
    As soon as I did that in the 2 subvi's the lockins actually began performing in real time and now it takes milliseconds to detect the signal and to update the displays.
    I hope this helps. I'm surprised the NI Tech rep I spoke with, hasn't recommended this even though I asked if there are perhaps some sort of compiling or priority options in LabView.
    Well I'm happy since my problem is now fixed, I just need to get a little more RAM now.

  • Video size issues/slow performance after update to CC 2014

    Hello everyone,
    I'm not an editor by trade, so please bear with me here. I've spent the last few days searching around for an answer and haven't been able to come up with much.
    I'm on a late 2011 Macbook Pro, 2.2 GHz Intel Core i7, 4 GB 1333 MHz DDR3, AMD Radeon HD 6750M 512 MB, Mac OS X Lion 10.7.5 (11G63b).
    I spent a month cutting my first little experimental feature which the assistant editor set up for me (and who is currently away).
    My computer isn't rocket fast, but I was able to complete the first few passes on Premiere CC (7.2.2?) with few major issues.
    About a week ago, I upgraded to Premiere CC 2014 8.0.
    I immediately noticed that my footage went from this:
    To this:
    (The specifics of the footage:
    As you might be able to tell, we shot very old school VHS to help sell the 90's setting. It was a nightmare to find the best way to export it all. I'm still not sure if we did this entirely properly -- and hopefully it's not the cause of these issues. Also, I know VHS is only SD -- we chose to import at the utmost quality, i.e. 1920x1440 and ProRes 422, because more of the image detail was present in low-light.)
    I found that I had to select all the clips in each timeline, right click, and select the 'Set to Frame Size' to have the video full frame once again. Then I had to render everything.
    As I tried to resume my edit, the performance was much slower. Playback is a nightmare. I get the beach ball of death constantly. It would take several minutes to save the project. And it started to crash about once an hour on top of everything.
    But I continued to work for the last eight days, hoping that I'd be able to rectify this somehow.
    I cleared the cache with no luck.
    I read that I could uncheck 'Composite in Linear Color' to make it faster, but that wasn't an issue in the last build.
    My playback and paused resolution is 1/4.
    I read that I should update my OS to OS X Mavericks, but that keeps crashing too! Haha.
    I understand that my system isn't the best, but I just want my project to perform as well as it did on Premiere CC before the update.
    I just spoke to an Adobe tech who basically told me that there wasn't a solution here besides reverting back to Premiere CC from CC 2014 -- or buying a new Macbook.
    But there has to be a way that I can get the same performance that I did before the upgrade, right? I have a feeling something happened to how CC 2014 is using the existing footage.
    (Also, I noticed that clips where I increased the zoom, i.e. 100% to 110%, were back at their original size. And instead of saying 100%, it was now saying 300%. I'm assuming this is because of the 'Set to Frame Size' setting, but this wasn't the case on Premiere CC.)
    Does anyone have any ideas what I can do here?
    Here's my sequence settings on CC 2014:
    And on CC:
    For some reason, portions of this window are grayed out, and not in CC 2014. Not sure if this has anything to do with the issue.
    Thanks a ton in advance everyone! I really can't afford to lose 8 days worth of work, so any help would be greatly greatly appreciated!
    I'll be more than happy to provide additional info.
    I'm really looking to find out, definitively, if my only two options are: a) go back to Premiere CC and lose my recent work, or b) buy a new laptop, which I can't afford.
    (As a side question, is there any way I can transfer my recent work from CC 2014 to CC? I understand it's not backwards-compatible, but there has to be at least a partial solution.)
    Best,
    Jon

    Thanks for the quick response!
    So just this right (to DV):
    I scrubbed through really quick, seems like it just may have worked.

  • ITunes 10.1 (64-bit) slow performance

    Hello all,
    I have recently bought a new pc, a very fast machine (see details below), but I'm experiencing bad performance with iTunes 10.1 (64-bit) for windows.
    I don't have a lot of stuff in iTunes, I have about 120 apps, 500 songs, 1200 photos, couple of ringtones and 0 videos in my library. The whole iTunes interface responds slowly. Like clicking on Music, Videos, my iPhone in the side menu makes iTunes freeze for a couple of seconds and then switches to the screen. Even after loading a screen iTunes is freezed for a seconds before it's responsive.
    I've googled around for a while, and got some tips to disable some options in the preference window, so I've set all unnecessary things off, like: crossfadings songs, automatic update checking, looking for devices, automatic organizing, ping, genius, shared libraries, etc. but it doesn't speed up iTunes much.
    It gets even worse whenever I connect my iPhone 3G (Fw 4.2.1, 16GB, Black). iTunes simply freezes for like half a minute and the pc makes a few beeping noises because of connecting an usb-device. Even Windows 7 slows down a lot while connecting. iTunes gets responsive once my iPhone appears under devices in the side menu.
    Software I have constantly running in the backround are: AVG anti-virus free edition, SQL Server 2008, Steam and Skype. Turning off these softwares doesn't make a difference as well. There are no virusses or whatever on my pc. I let AVG anti-virus do a complete scan like once a week.
    Taskmanager shows iTunes using about 240,000K of memory, followed by steam with 70,000k of memory and skype with 30,000k of memory.
    Anyone else experiencing slow performance or know how to resolve this ?
    System details:
    Windows 7 64-bit
    Intel i7 950 @ 3.06GHz quad core processor
    6gigs of ddr3 (1600mhz) memory
    Ocz vertex2 ssd (The O/S and all music, photos, apps are on this disk)
    nvidia graphics card gtx460
    Message was edited by: Leon49

    Same with me! I recently bought a new laptop, and iTunes 9 was working just fine. It takes like 5 seconds to scroll down one line. Clicking on different tabs and things takes forever as well. I am not sure what is causing it yet, but like you, I have disabled all sorts of iTunes settings which has not helped yet. Hopefully Apple will fix this problem soon! Let me know if you find a way to solve this.
    My PC Specs which are well above the minimum requirements:
    Asus UL80Jt
    Windows 7 64-Bit
    Intel i3 330UM Dual Core Processor @ 1.2GHz (ASUS Overclocking to 1.7 GHz)
    4GB RAM
    1.3 GB Dedicated Video RAM
    128 SSD

  • Very slow performance; external boot drive the cause?

    Greetings.
    I bought a 500 GB Hitachi drive for my iMac intending to install it myself. But, alas, I have an iSight iMac and I think it's beyond my ability to do the job. A Mac dealer nearby can do it for me, but wants the computer for two or three days, even thought the installation takes about an hour. They will not make an appointment for me to come in with it and wait.
    So I installed it the drive in an OWC Mercury Elite case, cloned the original drive, and have been booting from the Hitachi via Firewire 400. Just about everything is running at well under previous speeds. Lightroom now takes as much as two to five minutes to spool a large file for printing and sometimes does not even send the file to the printer (in fairness, the latter issue happened sometimes with the internal drive – I wrote about it here before – but at least it didn't take a long time to spool the file, which has to happen each time I click "print" until at last it actually goes to the printer).
    I'm getting slow performance from Safari (4.1.3), Mail (2.1.3), Lighroom 2, Photoshop (CS3). I can't say I've noticed problems elsewhere, but I rarely use other applications.
    I have done all the usual maintenance tasks, besides those the computer does automatically. Repaired permissions. Emptied caches. Burned sage. Etc.
    If this is the inevitable result of running from an external disk, then I'll have to brave the installation or pay someone to do it (which I would do immediately if I knew someone who would do it "while-u-wait").
    If, however, this sounds like booting from the external drive should not be the problem, and there is something I might do to speed things up, I'd be grateful for your suggestions.
    As always, thank you.
    Leonard B.

    Too bad about the site redesign. I had a draft of this message started, then got busy. Now I have no idea where to look for it. (And what happened to the Preview function?)
    ANYWAY…  I talked to a tech person at Other World Computing about the problem. He was of the opinion that the iMac SHOULD be showing some slower response if booted from the external drive, but that maybe the sluggishness in this case was excessive. He had me run a hardware scan to see whether there were any bad blocks. After 24 hours, Speed Tools reported no problems. So now I have run every diagnostic and repair tool I know of and every one that was suggested (every one that I own, that is), and the computer is still hesitating so much that I just have to get up and walk away from it sometimes in order to stay sane.
    I am booting from the original hard drive when I have to do extended internet research (Safari being the biggest speed offender), but run the iMac from the external drive when I have to do photo editing, since all my preferences, Lightroom libraries, etc., are located there. If I had the time to figure out just where the essential, and relevant, system and application files are located, I suppose that I could copy them and move them onto the internal drive. Then I could just use the external for storage of the image files (can't do that on the internal; there's not enough space). However, if what is going on (slowness issue) is indicative of a faulty drive, I'd rather not use it at all, even as a storage or backup drive.
    Any thoughts? Do you suppose this might be a problem with the computer, not with the new drive? I'd hate to ask OWC to exchange it (even if they would do that) and then find out I've got the same trouble.
    Thanks again in advance.
    Leonard

  • BC_MSG slow performance

    I experience slow performance in a SAP PI 7.1EHP1 SP05 installation. The BC_MSG table contains about 550.000 messages. I archive and delete message that are 10 days old. The environment is Redhat Linux 5.5 64bit with 16GB RAM and oracle 10.2.0.4.<br>
    <br>
    The problem is when I want to query all message containg error in the last 7 days or more. It needs about 5 minutes to respond and sometimes more that ends with request timeout from ICM. I shrink the tables, rebuild the indexes, restart the system many times, apply latest service pack (SP06) but the performance remains unchanged.<br>
    <br>
    The query that is executed is the following:<br>
    <br>
    <pre>
    SELECT "MSG_ID","DIRECTION","REF_TO_MSG_ID","CORRELATION_ID","SEQUENCE_ID",
      "SEQUENCE_NBR","CONN_NAME","MSG_TYPE","STATUS","TO_PARTY_NAME",
      "TO_PARTY_TYPE","FROM_PARTY_NAME","FROM_PARTY_TYPE","TO_SERVICE_NAME",
      "TO_SERVICE_TYPE","FROM_SERVICE_NAME","FROM_SERVICE_TYPE","ACTION_NAME",
      "ACTION_TYPE","DELIVERY_SEMANTICS","SENT_RECV_TIME","TRAN_DELV_TIME",
      "SCHEDULE_TIME","PERSIST_UNTIL","TIMES_FAILED","RETRIES","RETRY_INTERVAL",
      "MSG_PROTOCOL","TRANSPORT","ADDRESS","CREDENTIAL","TRAN_HEADER",
      "VALID_UNTIL","NODE","ERROR_CODE","ERROR_CATEGORY","PP_USER","PP_HASH",
      "VERS_NBR","VERS_WAS_EDITED","PRIORITY_TYPE","PRIORITY"
    FROM
    "BC_MSG" WHERE "BC_MSG"."MSG_ID" IS NOT NULL AND ("STATUS" = :1 OR "STATUS" =
       :2) AND "SENT_RECV_TIME" >= :3 AND "SENT_RECV_TIME" <= :4 ORDER BY 21 DESC
    </pre>
    <br>
    Parameters:<br>
    :1 = 'FAIL'<br>
    :2 = 'NDLV'<br>
    :3 = 2011-03-01 08:06:02.34 (example)<br>
    :4 = 2011-03-02 08:06:02.34 (example)<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    This statement is executed for each day for the time interval I specify (e.g. 7 days of the week if the interval is 'Last 7 Days'). I don't know why they don't use one SQL for the specified interval.<br>
    <br>
    When I enable trace in the Open SQL monitor the execution time I see is very disappointing, about 22 - 46 seconds for each query. I also enable SQL trace in Oracle database and the results I get are the following:<br>
    <br>
    <pre>
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      2      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Fetch        2     10.74      79.70      50473      62752          0           6
    total        4     10.74      79.70      50473      62752          0           6
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 32
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
       Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait  Total Waited
       Waited  -
      db file sequential read                     50473        0.15         72.90
      SQL*Net message to client                       2        0.00          0.00
      SQL*Net more data to client                     1        0.00          0.00
      SQL*Net message from client                     2        0.00          0.00
    </pre>
    <br>
    The 'db file sequential read' is what worries me but I don't know what to do.<br>
    <br>
    Also I tried the same query using Db Visualizer and the jdbc jar file. The response was much better and the execution plan was different as you can see in sql trace results:<br>
    <br>
    <pre>
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.01       0.01          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Fetch        1      0.00       0.00          0          7          0           0
    total        3      0.01       0.01          0          7          0           0
    Misses in library cache during parse: 1
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 32
    Rows     Row Source Operation
          0  SORT ORDER BY (cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=636 us)
          0   INLIST ITERATOR  (cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=487 us)
          0    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID BC_MSG (cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=459 us)
          0     INDEX RANGE SCAN I_BC_MSG_STATUS_SENT (cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=347 us)(object id 96079)
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
       Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait  Total Waited
       Waited  -
      SQL*Net message to client                       2        0.00          0.00
      SQL*Net message from client                     2        0.18          0.19
    </pre>
    <br>
    The I_BC_MSG_STATUS_SENT index that scans is the index using the columns STATUS, SENT_RECV_TIME I created to see if performance is better.<br>
    <br>
    Generally the system works fine. I handles 50.000 messages per day with no delays. But the monitoring performance is annoying. I need your expertise on that.<br>

    You, also, have waaaay too many user startup/Login items.
    You need to pare these down to the apps you really need to have launched at startup and running in the background.
    Add or remove automatic items
    Choose Apple menu > System Preferences, then click Users & Groups.
    Select your user account, then click Login Items.
    Do one of the following:
    Click Add below the list on the right, select an app, document, folder, or disk, then click Add.If you don’t want an item’s windows to be visible after login, select Hide. (Hide does not apply to servers, which always appear in the Finder after login.)
    Select the name of the item you want to prevent from opening automatically, then click Delete below the list on the right.
    You need to make sure to update all of your third party software if there are OS X Mavericks updates that can be applied.
    You may need to go the third party developers' websites if there are no updates through the Mac App Store.
    Make sure all of your Web browser Internet plugins, extensions and add-ons are updated to recent versions, also.

  • Dreamweaver CS3 (9) maxed CPU slow performance and FTP issues.

    Dreamweaver CS3 (9) maxed CPU slow performance and FTP
    issues.
    Never mind...I found it.
    Of course I have all the firewall, worm, scanning, phishing
    filtering, full time protect, and everything else turned off when I
    am working on a remote/testing site however I found the Symantec
    antivirus email scan being enabled (doesn't it just interact with
    my email program?) was getting in the way of DW9 ftp operations,
    causing some lagging that was putting DW9 into an unstable mode
    during and immediately after (10 seconds) ftp operations.
    The CPU still spikes to 99% during ftp functions but DW9
    works even though it's likely taxed to the max but when I turn off
    email scan DW9 returned to a functioning state during ftp and
    remote file view. Whatever it takes huh?
    PS: email scanning only never effected DW8.02
    My System Info: properly configured (as in: everything works
    or I fix it) Toshiba - XP pro SP2 – Pentium 4 - 2.3GHz
    – 1.5 GB ram – Intel extreme graphics card 64 MB ram
    – Apache 2.2 server – PHP 5 – MySQL 5 -
    phpMyAdmin – Dreamweaver 8.02 – Interakt Kollection
    3.7.1 – Dreamwweaver 9 - DeVtoolbox – Flash –
    GoLive - Photoshop - ImageReady – Illustrator – Acrobat
    – CuteFTP – Putty SSH - blabla...)

    Thanks for the response. I managed to Google the 'nobody' account and found the explanation.
    As you say, I assumed the 'syslogd' process had to do with system logs. I did check the console and couldn't find anything of particular interest in the logs.
    I'll continue to monitor but if anyone has any further suggestions please post.
    One thing that might also have an impact... my available drive space is now down to less than 5gb (runs anywhere between 1gb and 5gb free depending on what I'm running). I know this causes problems for Parallels as it keeps moaning at me, but would it cause any problems with OSX?
    Thanks again,
    Tom

  • Laggy and Slow Performance

    We are an architectural company, and we use photoshop to create masterplanning, arhitectural, landscape plans. So keep in mind that theres a bunch of layers with drop shadow, textures, bevel & emboss etc in it.
    We recently upgraded to CS6, our PC's are installed with Windows 7 64-bit, 16 Gb or RAM, 1 Gb NVIDIA Quadro 2000D Graphics cards. 
    As Graphics Support, I make sure that updates, fixes are installed and all that stuff. But still, we experience some laggy and slow performance from Photoshop. The file is 660 MB, and is set to 150 Resolution. Takes a while to open, I can understand that it might be reading all those details, but once opened  you wont get a realtime response from Photoshop. This happend before but was able to fix with the update that Adobe had released.
    With our PC build, I cant find any reason why would still we get this kind of performance.
    Please let me know if you have some solution to this.
    Thanks.

    CUDA is (and always will be) NVIDIA Proprietary.
    Apple has made a strong commitment to OpenCL (not to be confused with OpenGL) to harness the power of every manufacturer's GPU. OpenCL will work with NVIDIA/CUDA or AMD cards.
    Adobe has committed to OpenCL for the newest versions of their Premiere PRO CC software.
    http://blogs.adobe.com/premierepro/2013/06/adobe-premiere-pro-cc-and-gpu-support .html
    In my opinion it is only a matter of time before most production software supports OpenCL.
    Gaming, on the other hand, may not feel that same pressure. Those guys tend to do what they want.
    Any thoughts on how dramatically a second display would affect performance?
    A second display does not seem to affect these cards in any sort of perceptible way.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Variables in Bex Analyser

    Hi, I am trying to include two variables (ZCS_TDAT - User Entry/Default Value ,Selection Option,Ready for Input and ZCS_DDAT - Customer Exit,Selection Option , Not Ready for Input) both under 0CALMONTH. While trying to move them in Rows it is giving

  • Adobe Captivate 6 trial - installation failure

    I just downloaded the CP 6 demo and when I went to run the installer I got this message: "Installation failed The product you are trying to install is not an Adobe Genuine Software and appears to be counterfeit. Please report piracy or contact custom

  • SAP Basis and Seurity

    Hi Friends, Good day. We have SU3 for all the Employees. Now we need to restrict for some employees but as it is change tcode there is no any display option to restrict. So please give me any heads up where we can also have display in SU3, so that we

  • FME audio drop down list issue

    Currently FME only lists my recording devices (microphone, line in etc... I do not have stereo mix) and none of my playback devices (Default audio devices or any other), was it intentional that the only way to stream audio from my PC is via use of st

  • Will mountain lion upgrade be available for all my computers

    when i upgrade to mountain lion on one computer, can I download to all my other macs?