Global Object Differences

Does anyone know where I can read up on the differences between Acrobat 9 and X on the global object?

Under Changes for 10.1.1, XP system I created the following path below and even reboot the computer and still get the same error message. I am trying to get 3 computers up and running 1 in the same building and 2 oversea in Czech Republic. I had one of the Czech Republic computers rolled back to Reader 9.0 and had them place the script in the C:\Program Files\Adobe\Reader 9.0\Reader\JavaScript folder, again same error message. Could there be an issue with my code being written in the USA and there using a Reader made for Czech Republic?
C:\Documents and Settings\JoeUser\Application Data\Adobe\Acrobat\Privileged\10.0\JavaScripts

Similar Messages

Cs3 bug - global objects and frame labels

Just found a bug that took me an hour to figure out.
A strange problem occurred when I had a global object and a
frame label named the same.
Example:
_global.discussion = new Object();
//lots of functions here
I was directing the timeline of a movieClip to the frame
label "discussion". On this frame there were a number of actions
involving the discussion object. However, flash was treating the
object as if it didn't exist. All variables / functions residing in
this object were completely gone. Has anyone seen this problem. If
not, watch out for it.
james

that's coder bug, not a flash bug.

Global Object Services (GOS) Attachments Deleted from Maintenance Task List

We use the Global Object Services (GOS) Attachments function to attach Word and Excel Documents to Maintenance Task Lists (transactions IA02, IA09). Recently we noted that more than 300+ Attachments had been deleted/removed from the GOS list visible via IA03/IA09. We are at a loss for explaining how this occurred- all Attachments appear to have been deleted at once/instantaneously. We can see the underlying tables (SGOSHIST and others) still contain entries, but we do not understand why the Attachments are no longer visible in the GOS list via Maintenance Task Lists, or how the ability to access these via GOS can be restored. This is not occurring with other PM Object Attachments - only Task Lists. Any help or suggestions appreciated.

Is it possible that there was some authorisation change in a role associated with task lists? That would be consistent with the immediate loss - but only in the task list area. Another thought - has anyone been doing any programming in the Generic Object Services Business Add-Ins (perhaps for another module?) - They might have inadvertently clobbered your use?
Do you use the GOS notes functionality? Does that still work?

Global object Services ( GOS ) in WD4A

Hi Gurus,
does anybody know if the former Global object Services ( GOS ) are availabel in WD4A?
Any planning for transforming them to the new UI-technology?
Best regards
Andreas

Even i am looking for a standard web dynpro interface for the same.
there are no Non Dialog services for Attachments to Business objects.
Currently i am using my custom code.
Get the folder ID
CALL FUNCTION 'SO_FOLDER_ROOT_ID_GET'
   EXPORTING
OWNER                       = ' '
     region                      = 'B'
   IMPORTING
     folder_id                   = ls_fold
   EXCEPTIONS
     communication_failure       = 1
     owner_not_exist             = 2
     system_failure              = 3
     x_error                     = 4
     OTHERS                      = 5
CALL FUNCTION 'SCMS_XSTRING_TO_BINARY'
EXPORTING
    BUFFER                = CS_ATTACH-FILE_CONTENT
APPEND_TO_TABLE       = ' '
IMPORTING
   OUTPUT_LENGTH         = LV_SIZE
TABLES
    BINARY_TAB            = LT_CONTENT
DESCRIBE TABLE LT_CONTENT LINES LV_LINES.
LOOP AT LT_CONTENT INTO LS_CONTENT.
LS_BIN-LINE = LS_CONTENT-LINE.
APPEND LS_BIN TO LT_BIN.
ENDLOOP.
CALL FUNCTION 'SO_LOIO_PHIO_CREATE'
IMPORTING
   LOIO_OBJECT            = LS_LOIO
   PHIO_OBJECT            = LS_PHIO
EXCEPTIONS
KPRO_MODEL_ERROR       = 1
X_ERROR                = 2
OTHERS                 = 3
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
        WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
LS_ACCESS-COMP_ID = CS_ATTACH-FILE_NAME.
LS_ACCESS-COMP_SIZE = LV_SIZE.
LS_ACCESS-BINARY_FLG = 'X'.
LS_ACCESS-FIRST_LINE = 1.
LS_ACCESS-LAST_LINE = LV_LINES.
APPEND LS_ACCESS TO LT_ACCESS.
CALL FUNCTION 'SCMS_R3DB_EXPORT'
EXPORTING
MANDT                 = SY-MANDT
    CREP_ID               = 'SOFFDB'
   DOC_ID                = LS_PHIO-OBJID
PHIO_ID               =
DOC_PROT              = ' '
OVERWRITE             = '-'
CREA_TIME             =
IMPORTING
DOC_ID_OUT            =
TABLES
   ACCESS_INFO           = LT_ACCESS
CONTENT_TXT           =
   CONTENT_BIN           = LT_BIN
EXCEPTIONS
ERROR_EXPORT          = 1
ERROR_IMPORT          = 2
ERROR_PARAMETER       = 3
FORBIDDEN             = 4
OTHERS                = 5
SPLIT CS_ATTACH-FILE_NAME AT '.' INTO TABLE LT_FILE_NAME.
READ TABLE LT_FILE_NAME INTO LS_HD_CHANGE-OBJDES INDEX 1.
READ TABLE LT_FILE_NAME INTO LS_HD_CHANGE-FILE_EXT INDEX 2.
LS_HD_CHANGE-OBJLEN = LV_SIZE.
LS_HD_CHANGE-OBJPRI = '5'.
ls_hD_CHANGE-extct = 'K'.
CONCATENATE '&SO_FILENAME=' LS_HD_CHANGE-OBJDES '.'
            LS_HD_CHANGE-FILE_EXT INTO LS_OBJHD.
APPEND LS_OBJHD TO LT_OBJHD.
CLEAR LS_OBJHD.
CONCATENATE '&SO_FORMAT=BIN' LS_OBJHD INTO LS_OBJHD.
APPEND LS_OBJHD TO LT_OBJHD.
CONCATENATE '&SO_KProObjectID=' LS_LOIO INTO LS_OBJCONT-LINE.
APPEND LS_OBJCONT TO LT_OBJCONT.
CALL FUNCTION 'SO_OBJECT_INSERT'
EXPORTING
    FOLDER_ID                        = LS_FOLD
OBJECT_FL_CHANGE                 = ' '
   OBJECT_HD_CHANGE                 = ls_hD_CHANGE
    OBJECT_TYPE                      = 'EXT'
ORIGINATOR_ID                    = ' '
OWNER                            = ' '
IMPORTING
OBJECT_FL_DISPLAY                =
   OBJECT_HD_DISPLAY                = LS_HD_DISP
   OBJECT_ID                        = LS_OBJECT
TABLES
    OBJCONT                          = LT_OBJCONT
    OBJHEAD                          = LT_OBJHD
OBJPARA                          =
OBJPARB                          =
EXCEPTIONS
ACTIVE_USER_NOT_EXIST            = 1
COMMUNICATION_FAILURE            = 2
COMPONENT_NOT_AVAILABLE          = 3
DL_NAME_EXIST                    = 4
FOLDER_NOT_EXIST                 = 5
FOLDER_NO_AUTHORIZATION          = 6
OBJECT_TYPE_NOT_EXIST            = 7
OPERATION_NO_AUTHORIZATION       = 8
OWNER_NOT_EXIST                  = 9
PARAMETER_ERROR                  = 10
SUBSTITUTE_NOT_ACTIVE            = 11
SUBSTITUTE_NOT_DEFINED           = 12
SYSTEM_FAILURE                   = 13
X_ERROR                          = 14
OTHERS                           = 15
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
        WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
LS_OBJ_A-OBJKEY = IM_VBELN.
LS_OBJ_A-OBJTYPE = '/IRM/GCR'.
LS_OBJ_B-OBJKEY = LS_FOLD.
LS_OBJ_B-OBJKEY+17(17) = LS_OBJECT.
LS_OBJ_B-OBJTYPE = 'MESSAGE'.
CALL FUNCTION 'BINARY_RELATION_CREATE'
EXPORTING
    OBJ_ROLEA            = LS_OBJ_A
    OBJ_ROLEB            = LS_OBJ_B
    RELATIONTYPE         = 'ATTA'
FIRE_EVENTS          = 'X'
IMPORTING
BINREL               =
TABLES
BINREL_ATTRIB        =
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
        WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
EXPORTING
WAIT          =
IMPORTING
RETURN        =
Abhi

Has the Global Object Security changed

We have a form that uses a global object to work. Since Acrobat 9 and the introduction of the GOSP we have had to remind users to uncheck the "enable global object security policy" in the Javascript section of preferences.
Recently this has stopped working, the code still fails with a "InvalidSetError: Set not possible, invalid or unknown."
what;s going on?
can I re-enable the global objects maybe with a registry hack?

Thanks for getting back to me, I have sorted the issue (hopefully)
there are three sets of fields that form a date selector they all end in the same two digit number to identify them (which set on which page) this two digit ident is saved to a global variable so that the scripts that then make the day, month and year selector fields un-hide etc
anyway, it turned out that the first set was the one that failed, the other two on the page worked fine. So I deleted set 1 and copied set 2 and placed them where set 1 was, it all worked fine so I just renamed the fields back to set 1 and all was still ok.
The odd thing is that this issue has been there since the first version of the form in 2010 but has only now chosen to surface.
this is the code that the button uses
var fieldExtension = event.target.name.substring(event.target.name.length -2, event.target.name.length)
global.dateField = "date" + fieldExtension
if (this.getField("day" + fieldExtension).display == display.hidden){
showDate()
}else{
hideDate()
Anyway, all sorted

RE: Global Object -- the last word

Chris,
You are correct. My apologies for not testing my reply sooner. The
OLM.RegisterObject method does touch the NameService, but OLM caches
registrations and therefor OLM.BindObject is a local call. So there is one
network call, but that's all (unless the cache entries are aged out).
Andrew,
After testing all of the proposed solutions, using task.part.apptitle seems
the easiest one to implement. Subclass from TextNullable and add an
attribute to hold the reference to LocalCache. Remember, TextNullable can
not be anchored.
Caveat, you are relying on a Forte feature which may not be guaranteed to
work the same way in the future.
At 01:59 PM 10/17/97 -0500, you wrote:
Where would the network traffic come in? The object location manager
is local, and if you assume the cache object is also local (there is
one on each partition), I don't see where the network hit would be.
Would you please enlighten me?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chris Johnson
BORN Information Services Group
Forte National Practice
Direct: 612-404-4409
Fax: 612-404-4441
http://www.born.com
mailto:[email protected]
From: David Vydra[SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 1997 12:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Global Object
Guy,
At 11:35 AM 10/17/97 -0500, you wrote:
Another approach would be to use the partition's object locationmanager
(task.part.objectLocationMgr) to register the partition's local cachecontainer object (LOCache) under a name based on the
partition's name. Tasks needing the cache container can use the"bindObject" method to get the reference back.
I believe this would generate network traffic for each bind, and if
the
objects in need of the local service are transient the overhead may be
considerable.
========================================
David Vydra
Education Consultant
Forte Software, Inc.
[email protected]; phone: (510)986.3593

Possible problems with using task.part.appTitle.
1) Isn't appTitle part of the task? If it is, what happens when the
task goes across a partition boundary? Does the appTitle get serialized
and deserialized by Forte? As long as the cache itself is anchored this
reference held in the appTitle is only a proxy. (But a TextNullable
cannot be anchored.) If the cache is not anchored, won't the entire
cache get serialized and deserialized at each partition boundary?
2) If the appTitle goes with the Task when it crosses a partition
boundary, what happens when some piece of code in the other partition
attempts to use the cache? If the cache was able to be anchored,
wouldn't there a network hit at this point? Also, haven't you just lost
the 'local'ness of the local cache.
3) What about serialization problems when you enter a partition that
does not know about the cache object. Won't you get a deserialization
error when you enter a non-application partition such as the Node
Manager or Forte's run-time compiler?
4) Version 3 provides appContext which can be used to hold any Object.
This should probably only be used for very small objects or anchored
object that are used infrequently on a different partition. Since
appTitle cannot be anchored, why would you use it rather than
appContext (Version 2 is a different story)? AppContext appears to be a
more generic solution to the global object problem, one that Forte will
support. Neither AppContext nor appTitle appear to be solutions to a
local cache problem.
John G. Bielejeski
Born Information Services Group (http://www.born.com)
Forte National Practice
Voice: (612) 404-4116
Fax: (612) 404-4440
mailto:[email protected]
From: David Vydra[SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 1997 7:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Global Object -- the last word
Chris,
You are correct. My apologies for not testing my reply sooner. The
OLM.RegisterObject method does touch the NameService, but OLM caches
registrations and therefor OLM.BindObject is a local call. So there is
one
network call, but that's all (unless the cache entries are aged out).
Andrew,
After testing all of the proposed solutions, using task.part.apptitle
seems
the easiest one to implement. Subclass from TextNullable and add an
attribute to hold the reference to LocalCache. Remember, TextNullable
can
not be anchored.
Caveat, you are relying on a Forte feature which may not be guaranteed
to
work the same way in the future.
At 01:59 PM 10/17/97 -0500, you wrote:
Where would the network traffic come in? The object locationmanager
is local, and if you assume the cache object is also local (thereis
one on each partition), I don't see where the network hit would be.
Would you please enlighten me?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chris Johnson
BORN Information Services Group
Forte National Practice
Direct: 612-404-4409
Fax: 612-404-4441
http://www.born.com
mailto:[email protected]
From: David Vydra[SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 1997 12:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Global Object
Guy,
At 11:35 AM 10/17/97 -0500, you wrote:
Another approach would be to use the partition's object locationmanager
(task.part.objectLocationMgr) to register the partition's local
cache
container object (LOCache) under a name based on the
partition's name. Tasks needing the cache container can use the"bindObject" method to get the reference back.
I believe this would generate network traffic for each bind, and if
the
objects in need of the local service are transient the overhead maybe
considerable.
========================================
David Vydra
Education Consultant
Forte Software, Inc.
[email protected]; phone: (510)986.3593

Global object Services ( GOS ) for service users

Hi,
It is possible to have GOS ( Global object services ) ability for Service user type?
As far as I know only Dialog users has that ability.
Thanks,
Krishna.

it is not possible for service-users. never was.

Need one global object constructed ahead of others

We are working on porting an application from a Lynx
environment to Solaris using the Forte 6 development
tools. We're having a problem when a constructor for
one object tries to use a global object created in a
library file. The application uses an SLogFile class
to write warning messages to a particular destination.
This is specified in a source file called config.cpp like
so:
SLogFile _slog(fileno(stderr), SLogFile::warn);
SLogFile &slog = _slog;
config.cpp is compiled into config.o, which is then
stored in libclass.a.
In program testprog.cpp, we define a new class
whose constructor wants to use slog to write
output. I think the following simplification explains
what the application is trying to do.
extern SLogFile &slog;
class test {
public:
test(int val);
~test();
private:
int prival;
test::test(int val)
prival=val;
slog << "Initial value set to " << prival << "\n";
test testcritter;
int main(int argc, char** argv)
slog << "Count of arguments to main = " << argc << "\n";
return 0;
Through dbx, I can stop the program when it enters
test::test. slog points to slog, but slog is not
initialized. According to the documentation, this
can be resolved in g++ by the use of the load command
to get config.o loaded first (apparently getting _slog
constructed). Is there anyway to get this to happen
in the Solaris/Forte C++ environment?
Any help would be appreciated...

We are working on porting an application from a Lynx
environment to Solaris using the Forte 6 development
tools. We're having a problem when a constructor for
one object tries to use a global object created in a
library file. The application uses an SLogFile class
to write warning messages to a particular destination.
This is specified in a source file called config.cpp like
so:
SLogFile _slog(fileno(stderr), SLogFile::warn);
SLogFile &slog = _slog;
config.cpp is compiled into config.o, which is then
stored in libclass.a.
In program testprog.cpp, we define a new class
whose constructor wants to use slog to write
output. I think the following simplification explains
what the application is trying to do.
extern SLogFile &slog;
class test {
public:
test(int val);
~test();
private:
int prival;
test::test(int val)
prival=val;
slog << "Initial value set to " << prival << "\n";
test testcritter;
int main(int argc, char** argv)
slog << "Count of arguments to main = " << argc << "\n";
return 0;
Through dbx, I can stop the program when it enters
test::test. slog points to slog, but slog is not
initialized. According to the documentation, this
can be resolved in g++ by the use of the load command
to get config.o loaded first (apparently getting _slog
constructed). Is there anyway to get this to happen
in the Solaris/Forte C++ environment?
Any help would be appreciated...

Urgent - Global Objects

Hi All,
Actually I am in a big trouble , I began my first project in java and I need an answer for the following q.
1) - I need a global object to be seen from other objects
for the same user in the runtime for specific object??.
2)- I need a global object to be seen from other objects for all users in the runtime . I am trying to catch users to not enter in different sessions.
thanx in advance, your help is deeply appreciated.

I am sorry, I didn't read your original post as carefully as I should have. Using the Singleton pattern will work for objects that must be seen by multiple objects running within a single instance of a JVM.
For "global" objects to be reached from several instances of a JVM -- your second question -- there are a few techniques that you can use. It really does depend on the solution you are trying to create, however.
Are you attempting to expose just a single object, or want to expose many different objects, all of which will be globally accessible to other cliens? J2EE provides the solution and mechanisms to do either of the above; for a single object, I would suggest using JNDI, wheras the second would warrant using EJBs perhaps. (EJBs actually do use JNDI, but is a bit less manual and is a better solution if you have a need to expose multiple objects.)
Providing an overview of either of the aforementioned technologies would be overkill for a single post. Check out http://java.sun.com/j2ee for more information on them.

Why does diadem intellisense not work when using scriptinclude or for global object

I have a script with a different classes in it (scripted 1). When I create an object of a class in the script 1 intellisense works. Intellisense is when you type name of the object created from a class it shows all the possible variables and functions contained in that object. But when I write another script and use scriptinclude(scripted 1) the intellisense does not work. I also tried a global object and intesllisense does not work. Is there a way to get intellisense to work when using scriptinclude? I am working with version 2012.

Here is more information on the issue.
I have a script with a different classes in it (scripted 1). When I create an object of a class in the script 1 intellisense works. Intellisense is when you type name of the object created from a class it shows all the possible variables and functions contained in that object. But when I write another script and use scriptinclude(scripted 1) the intellisense does not work. I also tried a global object and intesllisense does not work. Is there a way to get intellisense to work when using scriptinclude? I am working with version 2012.
'Test.vbs
class test
    public function test1()
         msgbox("test1")
    end function
    public function test2()
         msgbox("test2")
    end function
end class
'now create a object of the class
dim oTest
set oTest=new Test
'now when you type oTest. you get the following functions to choose from
oTest.test1
        .test2
Now if you remove the object from Test.vbs and create a main program with scriptinclude(Test.vbs) it will not show the two functions
'Main.vbs
Option Explicit 'Forces the explicit declaration of all the variables in a script.
call scriptinclude("c:\1atmp\Test.vbs")
dim oTest
set oTest=new test
'now when you type oTest. it shows none of the functions in the object oTest
oTest.

Global Object Access Auditing test question

Hello!
There's a test question (N4) I'd like to have clearified:
http://exam.test4actual.com/70-411.pdf
Yes, D and F will enable auditing with no extra replication traffic, but enabling Global Object Acces Auditing will lead to auditing not only SYSVOL shares but to any others as well (http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2011/03/10/global-object-access-auditing-is-magic.aspx)
- is this replication traffic worth it???
Thank you in advance,
Michael

Hi,
For this question, the correct answer is DF, but we do not need to use Global Object Acces Auditing policy to audit SYSVOL shares.
About the replication traffic, please refer to:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb742457.aspx
Meanwhile, any changes made to SYSVOL are automatically replicated to the other domain controllers in the domain. If the files stored in SYSVOL change frequently, the replication increases the input and output for the volume where SYSVOL is located. For
example, editing a GPO can potentially force a GPO-level replication. If the volume is also host to other system files, such as the directory database or the pagefile, then the increased input and output for the volume can impact the performance of the server.
More detail information:
Introduction to Administering SYSVOL
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc778037(v=WS.10).aspx
Regards.

Global Object Building

I am using flash MX and looked in the actionscript dictionary
and it came with that example:
function Book(name, price){
this.name = name;
this.price = price;
book1 = new Book("Confederacy of Dunces", 19.95);
book2 = new Book("The Floating Opera", 10.95);
Now the problem is I want my object to be globaly usable by
other movieclips
I tried
function _global.Book(name, price)
and it wouldn't accept it
I tried:
_global.Book = new function (name, price)
but obviously it wasn,t an object that it gave...
So my qustion is how do I make global objects or
classes

You're second try was very close. Check F1 reference:
Learning ActionsScript 2.0 in Flash > Functions and
Methods > About functions and methods > About types of
methods and functions > Writing anonymous and callback functions
----------[ From F1 reference ]----------
To write an anonymous function:
Create a movie clip on the Stage, and then select the clip.
Open the Property inspector, and type my_mc into the Instance
Name text box.
Select Frame 1 of the Timeline, and type the following code
into the Actions panel:
var myWidth = function () {
trace(my_mc._width);
//later in code you can add
myWidth();
Select Control > Test Movie.
The width of the movie clip is displayed in the Output
panel.

World leaks were detected. 7 JavaScript global objects, 1 WKView object, 1 WKPageRef object, 1 WKFrameRef object.

Ok, I'm aware that the world leaks thing is probably nothing but what is going on with the other stuff? What is all of this other junk and how do I get rid of it? it happens when I close a Safari window and it tells me to report it.
The following world leaks were detected (the check is done when all browser windows are closed):
7 JavaScript global objects, 1 WKView object, 1 WKPageRef object, 1 WKFrameRef object.

If you have Safari's debug menu enabled (to the right of Help), then click that & de-select 'Always Check For World Leaks'.
If no debug menu, select all of the line below, then use Edit-Copy (or Command C) to copy it, then quit Safari.
defaults delete com.apple.Safari AlwaysCheckForWorldLeaks
Next, open Terminal from Applications/Utilities & paste in what you copied (Edit - Paste or Command V) & press enter

Testing global objects for undefined

I have two forms that ask for similar information. I have set up global objects so when form #2 is opened, it will grab the info from form #1.
But if form #1 is not opened (and therefore the global object is not created) I just want the fields in form #2 to be blank rather than display "Empty" for text fields and zeros for numeric fields.
I tried testing for undefined the following way but it is not working.
if (typeof global.testtext.rawValue != "undefined") {
this.rawValue = global.testtext;
In the above case, the condition always tests as false so the global variable is never set, even when it exists.

Found a solution. I don't test for undefined. I go ahead and set the field to the global variable and then test for "Empty" if it's a text field and 0 if it is a nummeric field. If the global variable doesn't yet exist, the fields are left blank rather than displaying "Empty" or a zero.
// For Text Field
this.rawValue = global.TextField1;
if (this.rawValue == "Empty") {
this.rawValue = "";
// For Numeric Field
this.rawValue = global.NumericField1;
if (this.rawValue == 0) {
this.rawValue = "";

Global objects

Is it possible to have global objects that can be accessed by any other class in Java

Take it from me: you don't want that many global objects in your programs
besides a few final Strings and such, but here is the mechanism:public class Globals {
   public static String globString= "I'm a global String";
   public static Integer finalAnswer= new Integer(42);
   // etc. etc. etc.
}kind regards,
Jos

Global Object Differences

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for