Good DV Deck for capturing?

I dont won't to wear out the heads on the PAN GS500. Great camera by the way.
-Brian

A second PAN GS500, Then you can shoot a second angle without the expense of a deck only investment. If you are worried about needing to replace this camera do to over use on the heads then replace it now and use it as a deck and camera.
Good Luck
Z1&V1user

Similar Messages

  • Need a good GUI app for capturing a watching TV

    kdetv and tvtime are very good for watching TV, but both can't capture in the broadcast.
    do you know a good app or frontend for capturing?

    i tried XDTV, but i didn't like it, it has an ugly interface (and was wery wery slow on my A64 too!), crashed sometimes...
    I tried then G4vl, its a GUI frontent to transcode, and uses the config files of xawtv, so you have to generate the channels with xawtv, then here you go...
    You have to recompille transcode with --enable-v4l option in order to work with Gv4l. It much better then xdtv imho, worked pretty good 4 me.
    I submitted a pkg in AUR, try it, vote for it
    http://gv4l.sourceforge.net/

  • Best DV deck for capturing Panasonic 24p footage

    Hi everyone,
    I'm working with 24p footage from Panasonic DVX-100A and HVX-200 cameras. I've always found the tapes tricky to capture with Advanced Pulldown Removal, and now I'm unhappy with my Sony DSR-11 VTR.
    I'm finding that some equipment plays nicer with 24p footage than others.
    Some of my editing colleagues have suggested that I should use Panasonic equipment - and they do have an equivalent low-end DV deck, the AG-DV2500.
    Any suggestions from the field? My budget does not permit buying a full-blown studio DVCam machine, unfortunately.
    Joe

    I put this question to Larry Jordan, of newsletter fame, and he feels that I'll be better off with a Panasonic VTR - so I'm gonna give that a try.

  • Anyone use the Sony GV-HD700 deck for their HD mini-Dv tapes?

    Hi, I've been filming on a Canon XH-A1 in HD and I can't get my tapes to play in the deck. It recognizes the timecode, it will fastforward and rewind just fine, I've got the setting set to HD, the iLink Conversion is off, and I've been through every menu option I can find, but when I hit play I get an error message that says "Change to correct tape format."
    Anyone know what I'm doing wrong?
    Incidentally, I can capture the footage into FCP through my camera, but obviously the whole point of getting the deck is to not wear out my camera's playheads...
    thanks much!
    -Sarah

    Hmmm....
    So before when I was shooting in SD, I thought I was shooting in 30F then too, and the deck plays back that just fine - am I missing a difference in SD vs HD types of 30F?
    I shoot documentary-style projects for artists, organic farmers, sustainable energy efforts... do you think there would be a noticeable negative change if I just switched to shooting 60i so I could use the deck for capture and playback when I'm in the field? I'm also intermixing footage I shoot with the Canon 5D mark II SLR, any input on that combo?
    Thanks so much, sorry if I'm asking dumb questions, I'm trying to figure all of this out but it's a bit overwhelming...
    -Sarah

  • Good camcorder for capturing

    hello, i am interested in doing editing work but cannot afford the $1500 decks to capture footage - at least for now. if i can make decent money i will upgrade to a prof. deck. but for now i was curious if anyone can recommend a good consumer camera i can get so i can capture footage. a friend told me he uses a sony handycam and it cost him $300. what are some essentials i should have on a camera, etc?
    thx

    If you are using mac with iLife '06 and older, then you should follow Da Nam advise for getting camera with iLink or firewire interface, but if you using iMovie from iLife suite '08, you can also consider tapeless camcorder that record movie to flash memory / Hard Disk / DVD.
    And here is the link to the compatibility list:
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=306171
    I think camcorder below $500 will served you well to begin with, but if you really need a good clarity footage captured, I would say you stick with mini DV camcorder for tapeless camcorder do more "compression" to the movie and therefor less quality (even thought the quality is not bad).
    Good Luck

  • What is a good video converter for iMac?  Premiere 6 will not capture from the Canon VIXIA HF G20.

    What is a good video converter for iMac?  Premiere 6 will not capture from the Canon VIXIA HF G20.

    Rather than convert, you'd be better off capturing with a more current version of the program -- one that supports AVCHD video. Otherwise, you're in for a lot of headache. A converter isn't going to solve your problems.
    BTW, when you say Premiere 6, do you mean Premiere 6 -- which is over 10 years old? (There was no Premiere Elements 6.)
    Trust me on this: Capture with a Mac version of Premiere Elements 11 or 12 and your video will be perfectly compatible with any Mac program.

  • A good miniDV camera for footage capture for FC6?

    I've got a Macbook Pro and FC6 and I'm looking to buy a miniDV camera just for the purpose of capturing my footage. I'm looking for a cheap camera, like the Samsung SC-D382, but don't know what sort of specifications to look for. Can I use a USB cable to capture footage, or does it need to be a 6 pin firewire cable? Also, does anyone have any recommendations regarding cheap but good cameras for capturing? Thanks!

    look for a camera that also has A/V inputs and will pass them through to firewire. That way, if the need arises, you can capture from an analog source such as a VCR (archiving, perhaps). This is a great budget solution, as dedicated D/A converters can cost as much as or more than a cheap miniDV camera.

  • 8mm and Canopus or Digital 8 for capturing 8mm tapes?

    I have a Canopus 300 that I've been using for capturing VHS tapes. I also have an 8mm camcorder. Will that camcorder + Canopus do as good a job as a Digital 8 camcorder or Digital 8 playback deck?
    Thanks!
    MikeR

    Probably only a side-by-side comparison using the same test footage would provide a definitive answer as to which path produced the better result.
    The data stream on a Digital8 tape is the same DV stream that is on a miniDV tape. The data is identical, it's just the physical tape that is different. You can only get 1 hour of DV onto a 2-hour Hi-8 tape, because the Digital8 camcorder runs the tape at approximately twice the speed.
    My Sony DCR-TRV460 is smart enough to recognize the signal and switch between modes. I even have a few tapes which have regular analog 8mm video on part of the tape and Digital8 on a later part of the same tape. When it reaches one of these changes, the camera automatically stops and switches mode, then starts rolling again.
    Not all DV is exactly identical, I have found out. There is a small discrepancy between the way Panasonic cameras record DV and the way Sony cameras record DV. I found this out when a colleague sent me a miniDV tape recorded on a Panasonic camera. I took it to a video shop to have it copied over to a Digital8 tape, which should have been a direct digital copy. But at the shop they told me Panasonic records DV in a slightly different way. The result is that there were some glitches and artifacts on the copy, and some audio problems as well. If you stick with all one manufacturer you should probably not run into that problem.
    The downside is that I have found Sony camcorders to suddenly fail to operate at the worst possible moments, and for no apparent reason. This has happened to me several times, in fact my TRV460 died a couple of weeks ago. It is always wise to have an expert repairman who is knowlegeable about Sony available at all times.
    I think that the Sony deck (GV-D200) might be exactly what you need for your project, but at $500 for a new one (or maybe $250-$300 for a used one on eBay) that would be a significant cost.
    Message was edited by: Bob Weaver

  • Settings for capture excise invoice in MIGO and other settings

    Hi,
      For excise invoice capture and post procedure which we are following is as follow
    1 : For Local Excise invoice
         After receving goods from Vendor  first we are Doing J1IEX Part 1,  Capture excise invoice  after saving this we are getting part 1 number,  then we are making GR with MB01 ref. to part 1 number , then qyuality inspection then updating material in Unrestricted stock from quality  afetr that we are doing J1IEX  poat  PART 2  here we are getting part 2 number  then invoice verification,
    2 : For import PO
          First MIRO for custom delivery cost we are getting MIRO number,  then J1IEX part 1 ref. to MIRO number and year  then MB01, ref. to part 1 of J1IEX then quality quality to store then J1IEX Part 2 then MIRO for vendor.
    now in many thread i read about capture invoice in MIGO   so i want to know the detail settings which required to be made so that we can perform our ruoutin in short time.
    regards,
      zafar

    hi
    >is there will be any effect in our existing procedure We want to follow both for some time , after that we will do only in MIGO,
    yes u can use both simultniously
    but in MIGO if u capture,  the step of updation J1i5 will be ommited (it will take palce automatically)
    like currently ur doing capture >update >post
    in migo only capture and then post
    >second think is that now while posting the capture excise invoice in J1IEX we rae entering part 1 number, so can we do woth >this while capturing it thorugh migo or we have to post with vendor excise invoice number only.
    You can do capture and post simultaniously in migo only
    the separate transaction is given as persons or users  may be diffrent for GR and excise
    if the same user want to do the GR and cap and posting then yes he can
    for capture and posting u also have to tick Post Excise Invoice Captured in MIGO in excise grp settings
    regards
    kunal

  • How can I use an external hard drive for capturing? I don't have enough mem

    I'm new at this...I have a Powerbook G4 and not nearly enough memory for capturing a full size video. Is there some way to send it to an external hard drive- for capturing, then burn it in my laptop? Would that external hard drive have to have IDVD loaded on it?

    Hi artdrake
    Just to add to the already good advice posted above.
    Another possible approach which works for me, assuming the ext. FireWire HD is large and fast enough (I recommend at least 120GB and 7200rpm) is to format the the ext. HD as stated above (journaled) and then clone your existing startup volume (using Carbon Copy Cloner) to the ext. Hard Drive. This will circumvent installing a fresh OS as well as all the iLife apps to the ext. device. You will simply make an exact copy of your laptops HD to the ext. volume. It takes me all of 30-40 mins. on my G4 system to do this procedure whereas installing everything from scratch may take several hours.
    Click Here for example/s:
    Once this is completed and assuming the ext. drive is connected securely via Firewire, Restart the computer while holding down the option key. Select the ext. FW HD. Once your G4 laptop is booted to external drive, use it as you would the primary drive. The only difference is that you now have plenty of room to capture to or to burn a DVD. This saves you from consuming much needed HD space on the G4 laptop plus it also serves as a fully operative backup hard drive for your G4.
    Hope this suggestion works as well for you as it does for me. Feel free to post back with additional questions/concerns.
    (3) G4 PM's/(3) S-Drives/Sony TRV900/Nikons/6FWHD's/PS7/iLife06/FCPHD/DVDSP/etc. Mac OS X (10.4.8) My ichatav AIM account is: SDMacuser1 (Please use Text chat prior to video)

  • No longer able to mute or change playback output device for capture.

    I have no preview button to turn off in my capture window and have instead gone into the FCP preferences to change the playback output device to something other then my Fireface800 IO device, such as the built in output so that what's being captured only comes out the little speaker in the tower.
    Thus I am free to work on other stuff. (8 core mac pro, gobs of ram, multitasking has never been a problem, even while capturing HD.)
    But as of the latest update (I keep all my apps up to date), capture plays through the System default device no mater what the FCP setting. So with out a mute button for the capture, I'm screwed.
    I'm screwed because I have to Mix down an EP while I capture 26 hours of conference footage at the same time. Obviously, I can't mix properly with that chatter playing loudly over it.
    Apple said I have to reinstall because there's no preview button and there should be but I am curious if there's any other way (because it's a huge pain in the *** and tends to screw up other things) and I would like to know if the way I usually do it is broken for other people, so I know if I can upgrade to the latest version again because it was some goofball problem with the framework that reinstalling fixed or if not because that's a bug in 7.0.3
    1. Choose one audio output (say, Built in Line Output or your default sound card) everywhere that matters in the Final Cut preferences for Audio output, including Audio Playback Output which is what I've been using to switch this for, gosh, years probably just out of habit.
    2. Log and Capture, capture some footage from tape. (I happen to be working with a basic HDV firewire profile.) What device do you hear output from?
    3. Stop capturing... and, if you wish, for good measure, close the capture window.
    4. Go back to FCP preferences, now choose a DIFFERENT audio output, say, Built In Speaker Output.
    5. Try to capture some footage. Is the sound coming out of the built in speaker now?
    IS THERE ANY OTHER WAY TO QUICKLY SILENCE THE AUDIO FROM FCP DURING CAPTURE?
    Thank you.

    excuse me, not linksystem, its a verizon FIOS wireless router & modem as part of the package. i was thinking my old setup.
    new system...cant edit my posts....?

  • Can I use a Bluetooth headphone/microphone for capture sound instead of normal iPhone mic when shooting video?

    Can I use a Bluetooth headphone/microphone for capture sound instead of normal iPhone mic when shooting video?
    The sound when I record video is not so good, so I'm trying to use the Bluetooth headphone/microphone to capture a person voice but not know which setting to use.

    Hi Robert
    Thanks for answering. I didn't know where to post other than the bluetooth forum which is relatively quiet and had no answers forthcoming.
    Yes the voice isn't reaching the amp although it is registering on the input bar in the Sound System Prefs, just won't "play through" as it were. I can't see how it could be done I was just hoping someone might see something I am missing.
    It seems a shame that you can't do it as iTunes on an old iBook makes a good juke box for DJ'ing and with everything becoming wireless these days it seems sensible that you could cut that one last wire.
    Mike

  • HQ vs standard pro res 422 for capture Help!

    This is my last question (I think).
    Would standard printed out on hdsr essentially look the same in this situation that I shouldn't bother with the HQ?
    A gentleman made a comment that I don't need HQ for capture but I am reading a lot of commentary on this.
    My feature film has a lot of effects, it is prepared for conversion from a 10bit digibeta sd file that was rendered out from an sd file.
    My end delivery is going to be cable broadcast and hdsr master, (though I know just for hdcam standard would be ok).
    I read different comments on here and on the web...and some of it comments if your end goal is broadcast you should have an HQ file if it comes from a 10-bit source and as well that more compression will happen down the road and taking that into consideration, as I'll be doing another render, I'd like this verified.
    And NOWHERE does it differentiate if that source is the file it's being converted from or the original footage it came from.
    And I will be effecting this last capture pro res file before another render to a final QT.
    I just want verification that standard will be ok as the individual who commented that it is I hadn't stated for sure what my delivery and end use would be and may have assumed I'd only be concerned with hdcam.
    Thanks.

    Nobody calls me a gentleman and gets away with it!
    There are many resources to heop you decide on a ProRes codec appropriate for your task. However, youmust weigh the processing cost of inadequate hardware against the possibly indiscernible difference in the HUGE difference in file sizes and heavy lifting.
    http://16x9cinema.com/blog/2009/7/31/sorting-out-the-apple-prores-family.html
    ProRes 422 (HQ)
    Visually lossless - highest-quality professional HD video that a (single-link) HD-SDI signal can carry.
    Supports full-width, 4:2:2 video sources at 10-bit pixel depths, while retaining its visually lossless characteristic through many generations of decoding and re-encoding.
    Apple ProRes 422 (HQ) can be used both as an intermediate codec to accelerate workflows for complex, compressed video sources and as an affordable, high-performance alternative to uncompressed 4:2:2 video.
    Has some subsampling of chroma, but retains very high quality.
    Supports 4:2:2 sources like DCVPRO HD, AVC-Intra,/100, XDCAM HD422/50.
    Data rate about 220 Mbps.
    ProRes 422
    Visually lossless, full-width 10-bit, 4:2:2 at lower data rate than ProRes (HQ)
    Offers better multi-stream RT editing performance. For most video applications, 422 is "good enough."
    Data rate about 147 Mbps
    The comparison in data density between HQ and vanilla 422 is 220/147.
    If you have the chops to KNOW you need to maintain this kind of image integrity then you have the hardware to accommodate the chore. If you have the chops but not the rig, forget it, you can't afford the time. If you have the rig but not the knowledge, forget it, you can't realize the benefits. It's a pretty simple decision matrix and, while you will get some recommendations, you're the only one who can pull this trigger. It's going to cost you time or money or both.
    Types of Apple ProRes Codecs
    The Apple ProRes format comes in five versions: Apple ProRes 4444, Apple ProRes 422 (HQ), Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 (LT), and Apple ProRes 422 (Proxy). The following list describes the features of each version. For a complete comparison of the relative data rates of the Apple ProRes codecs, see Apple ProRes Format Specifications.
    Apple ProRes 4444 
    The Apple ProRes 4444 codec offers the utmost possible quality for 4:4:4 sources and for workflows involving alpha channels. It includes the following features:
    Full-resolution, mastering-quality 4:4:4:4 RGBA color (an online-quality codec for editing and finishing 4:4:4 material, such as that originating from Sony HDCAM SR or digital cinema cameras such as RED ONE, Thomson Viper FilmStream, and Panavision Genesis cameras). The R, G, and B channels are lightly compressed, with an emphasis on being perceptually indistinguishable from the original material.
    Lossless alpha channel with real-time playback
    High-quality solution for storing and exchanging motion graphics and composites
    For 4:4:4 sources, a data rate that is roughly 50 percent higher than the data rate of Apple ProRes 422 (HQ)
    Direct encoding of, and decoding to, RGB pixel formats
    Support for any resolution, including SD, HD, 2K, 4K, and other resolutions
    A Gamma Correction setting in the codec’s advanced compression settings pane, which allows you to disable the 1.8 to 2.2 gamma adjustment that can occur if RGB material at 2.2 gamma is misinterpreted as 1.8. This setting is also available with the Apple ProRes 422 codec.
    Apple ProRes 422 (HQ)The Apple ProRes 422 (HQ) codec offers the utmost possible quality for 4:2:2 or 4:2:0 sources (without an alpha channel) and provides the following:
    Target data rate of approximately 220 Mbps (1920 x 1080 at 60i)
    Higher quality than Apple ProRes 422
    Apple ProRes 422The Apple ProRes 422 codec provides the following:
    Target data rate of approximately 145 Mbps (1920 x 1080 at 60i)
    Higher quality than Apple ProRes 422 (LT)
    Apple ProRes 422 (LT)The Apple ProRes 422 (LT) codec provides the following:
    Roughly 70 percent of the data rate of Apple ProRes 422 (thus, smaller file sizes than Apple ProRes 422)
    Higher quality than Apple ProRes 422 (Proxy)
    bogiesan

  • Suggestions for capturing video from HD source needed

    I'm wanting to capture video from my PS3 (using component or HDMI) and I have no idea what device is good. I'm not looking to spend a large sum of money but it has to be a USB or Firewire external device as I don't have a Mac Pro tower to install PCI cards... yet.
    I was looking at the Hauppauge HD PVR. Noticed it's not compatible with Mac's but saw if I purchase the elgato EyeTV software that it would work. I'm worried about compatibility and skeptical of trusting two products from two companies to work together without issue.
    So I was hoping people on here would have some suggestions.
    Thanks!

    Hope its not too late of a reply but the Hauppauge HD PVR is awesome! (that is, if you don't pick up a defective unit).
    I currently use one myself for capturing xbox 360 gaming clips on my hackintosh and have just figured out what the best settings are for native editing in FCP. You can read my reply in this thread for details:
    http://discussions.apple.com/click.jspa?searchID=-1&messageID=9485446
    I've found 2 apps (one of which is EyeTV 3) that allow you to capture to a Mac via USB2 cable. There's EyeTV 3 and then there's HDPVR Capture which can be found here:
    http://www.steventoth.net/blog/products/hdpvr-capture/
    I used HDPVR Capture first then got my hands on EyeTV 3 and I'll tell ya that EyeTV 3 has better export options. HDVPR-C outputs to M2TS or MP4. MP4 can be problematic when editing in FCP as I found out. But with EyeTV 3 you can export into a 100% native format for Final Cut Pro editing. HDPVR is cool though for a quick app to capture your clips. There's a free trial version that will only capture up to 2min. of footage.
    Btw, if you go with EyeTV 3 make sure you perform a software update after you install it because it doesn't support the Hauppauge HD PVR right off the bat in version 3.0 ..you need version 3.1.1 which you get free when you check for updates.
    hope this helps!

  • Monitoring sound for capture

    Hello -
    I have read through a few posts with similar dilemmas regarding how to monitor sound while capturing/logging. I now know I'm not going deaf.
    I have a Sony DSR-20 deck and will be soon changing that to a DSR-11 deck, and was planning to log shot-by-shot and then batch dig each tape. Obviously during interview footage I need to hear the sound.
    I also have temporary use of an NTSC monitor on loan, but I can't figure out how to hook up speakers to that. I don't have the right speakers, obviously, just my old ones with those red/white wires that I have on my ANCIENT stereo system.
    Should I invest in new speakers or just hook up my television to the deck? I know it's not perfect (that's ancient too). I am going crazy not being able to start this process since I only have this deck for a week or so.
    As a side note, I know that can instead import each full tape one by one and then go back and make subclips, hearing the sound at that point after the media has been captured. I'm not entirely clear on that process, whether you delete the original media and recapture based on your subclips, but that's for another post.
    I sound muddled and I am muddled. Any help will be so appreciated.
    15" Powerbook G4   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   1 GHz, 1 GB SDRAM, 60 GB HD

    thank you.
    I had read in an earlier post about it being better to listen to the audio off the VTR, not the computer, but I will try your suggestion as well. I just don't want to overtax my Powerbook G4 as I log and capture.
    Any other input?
    (quoted below, submitted last January by Studio X)
    When you download a video file from your camera, FCP and, more to the point, Quicktime is working furiously to split the muxed DV stream into distinct audio and video components. Though they stay within the same file wrapper, they are transcoded into unique components.
    The point of this is to explain that the computer (CPU, RAM, ect) are working very hard to do this conversion. Now, to ask the computer to figure out and play the audio while you are converting it just simply adds more CPU/RAM overhead to A VERY TIME SENSITIVE process. The conversion MUST happen in real time or frames are dropped.
    This is why it is highly recommended that you monitor your audio on speakers attached to your VTR not through your computer. It is also why FCP gives such a low res and slow refresh on the video component.

Maybe you are looking for

  • The Wi-Fi on my Ipod is not working.

    I can connect just fine, but after it wont let my open anything up saying, "cannot connect to the server".  This has happened several times with several different Wi-Fi points.

  • Upgrade 10.1.3.4 to 10.1.3.5 before running the R12 upgrade driver.

    Hi Everyone, Is it OK to upgrade the 10.1.3.4 OH to 10.1.3.5 after we install the R12.1.1 file system but before running the R12.1.1 upgrade driver, so that we could complete the techstack related steps before the actual downtime to save time during

  • Your favorite resources about effective learning in Captivate?

    Hi, I'm just getting started with Captivate, though I've been working in instructional design in digital publishing for education for a while. Now I'm going for my master's, and I'm planning on doing some hands-on action research about effective ways

  • Remove Hyper link from UWL ITems

    Hi All, How to remove Hyperlink from the UWL items list? Is that possible? I have list of tasks in UWL and I do not want to give hyper link to the end users since they already ahve "View Detail"  Button on UWL, Please help how to hide or remove hyper

  • WM not detecting user login

    Hello, I face a strange issue in a ZFD3.2/NW6 environment, on some specific PCs (for the moment HP Vectra VL800, may be others) all policies that should run at user login are not running, ie Printer Policy is listed but as "Never executed" and if you