Goods Issue after STO warning "Price change of % in month / for mater"

Dear all,
This is my process for Inter-co plant stock transfer:
1. Create STO via ME21N
2. Raise Goods Issue from source plant via MIGO_GI
3. I get this warning message "Price change of % in month / for mater", details as below:
Price change of % in month / for material
Message no. M7306
Due to action taken the quantity and value of the material are changed. This leads to calculation of a new moving average price: The new price deviates from the old one by .
Procedure
Before you carry out the posting, you should determine the reason for this difference.
You could check the material line items to find out which postings have led to the current moving average price. If the action taken refers to a purchase order, you could contact Purchasing to find out whether a mistake was made when entering the order price.
Has anyone seen this before and what should be the cause of action? Well, I was still able to proceed with the GI successfully but I'd like to know what has caused the message?
Thanks.
Steven

Hi Manohar,
My previous stock was 0.
So i received material 100 qty at 20 INR.
Total stock value = 2000
Now as per you:
2000 / ( 0 *6) * 100 = 33.33
I am not getting 390,17 %
Utsav

Similar Messages

Need Bapi Names for Post Goods Reciept and Post Goods issue to STO in MIGO

Hi All..
I need to post goods receipt using input data in MIGO. Is there any BAPI that i can use.
Also once STO (Stock Transport order) is created, i also need to Post goods issue to STO in MIGO transaction. I do need a bapi for this too...
Appreciate your help and will reward any helpful answers.
Thanks..

Hi,
ata : gm_header type bapi2017_gm_head_01.
data : gm_code    type bapi2017_gm_code.
data : gm_headret type bapi2017_gm_head_ret.
data : gm_item    type table of
        bapi2017_gm_item_create with header line.
data : gm_return type bapiret2 occurs 0 with header line.
data : gm_retmtd type bapi2017_gm_head_ret-mat_doc.
clear : gm_return, gm_retmtd. refresh gm_return.
gm_code-gm_code      = '03'.
gm_header-header_txt = firstscreen-bktxt.
    gm_header-pstng_date = sy-datum.
    gm_header-doc_date   = sy-datum.
    gm_header-ver_gr_gi_slip = ' '. "print
    gm_code-gm_code      = '03'.
move lineitem1-bwartwa to gm_item-move_type     .
      move lineitem1-matnr to gm_item-material.
      move lineitem1-erfmg     to gm_item-entry_qnt.
      move 'EA'    to gm_item-entry_uom.
      move lineitem1-werks to gm_item-plant.
      move lineitem1-lgort to gm_item-stge_loc.
      move lineitem1-kostl to gm_item-costcenter.
      while gm_item-costcenter+9(1) = ' '.
        shift gm_item-costcenter right.
      endwhile.
      overlay gm_item-costcenter with '0000000000'.
      append gm_item.
call function 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE'
       exporting
            goodsmvt_header = gm_header
            goodsmvt_code    = gm_code
       importing
            goodsmvt_headret = gm_headret
            materialdocument = gm_retmtd
       tables
            goodsmvt_item    = gm_item
            return           = gm_return.
Thanks
venki

Post Goods issue after clicking on Load Starting push button

Hi All,
Post goods issue for deliveries, suppose if the shipment document is created for XXXX country do the post goods issue after clicking the push button loading start on. and if the shipment is created other than the XXXX Country do the post goods issue after clicking the shipment start button(Done by Standard SAP).
There will be validation table in background to identify which shipping point to allow Post Goods Issue before shipment completion. This will require enhancement of Delivery User Exit to incorporate above check based on below mentioned Z Table.
Z-Table
- Shipping Point.
- Delivery Type
Any body please suggest the user exit or any function module and how to start code for this particular requirement.
Thanks & Regards,
Narasimha

Hi,
You can write your own vaalidation on click of loading start button.
Go to include MV56AI_IS_ENHANCEMENT of program SAPMV56A.
Click on the circular button(Enhance).
Then Edit --> Enhancement Operation --> Create.
Create your enhancement giving it a Z name.
Then in this enhancement you can write your code.
For loading start you can write your code in the following fashion.
IF fcode = 'MM_ST03'.
business logic.....
ENDIF.
Regards,
Firoz.

Serial Number not suitable for movement when doing goods issue or sto ?

Dear all ,
I have a issue , when doing sto or goods issue ,
i have a material code serial number profile is off physical quantity is laying 20 and my requirement is active the serial no
and assign to serial number for the material ,
Tcode is iq01 put the material , serial number and category after save when i am doing ma1a putting material ,quantity
and that serial number click on save , geting error like
Stock data of serial number 1234 not suitable for movement
when i am checking iq02 serial number is showing but checking in MMbe there is not showing
Regards
Shiv

hello,
to activate the serial numbers you first have to clear all the stock for this material (MVT 562 / 502 or other)
Than activate the serial in the material muster.
in your situation (if i understood correctly) what you need is:
1. disable the serial numbers for the material (move them to another material)
2. deactivate the serial number in the material master
3. get rid of all the stack - post it with 562 or 502
4. activate serial numbers
5. post the material back to stock - 561 / 501 - than the system will require a serial number for each unit

HU error when Reversing the goods issue in STO process

Hello Gurus,
I will explain the whole process we follow for STO:
1. Create sales order ->Based on PR in sales order schedule lines, PO will be created -> outbound delivery -> Pack in HU -> PGI -> based on output type Idoc will be triggered -> this outbound IDOC will create the Inbound IDOC and Inbound delivery -> Here HU will copied from Outbound delivery (Means both in inbound delivery and outbound delivery HU is same)-> then do the Good receipt in Inbound delivery.
Now when user doing the goods receipt he is getting error MSSA-SATRA exceeded by 1PCE The reason is someone deleted the item from the sales order. Hence when user trying to post the GR it is checking for the open sales order item in MSSA table. Since it has been deleted from the sales order he cant able post GR.
Now user does not wants to receive this item, hence we wants to reverse the process.
So we followed the below process:
1. Unassigned the HU in Inbound delivery and then deleted the Inbound delivery.
2. Then used VL09 transaction to reverse the goods issue. But system giving error saying that HU is already assigned to object.
I cant able to reverse the Goods issue since the HU is same in Inbound delivery and outbound delivery.
Kindly suggest the reversal process for the above case. Many thanks for your help in advance.
Awating for your valuable replies.
Br,

Insted of deleting the handling units you should have un assign the handling units from inbound delivery.You have deleted the handling units and the same handling units will not be available in outbound delivery Pack icon.
Do one thing are you able to enter line item in sales order ?.If yes then create inbound delivery manually and create new handling units for the qty and do GR.
Currently where is the stock is it transit ?.If yes then above option may work.
If nothing is possible only an option to write a SAP oss note they will correct your outbound delivery and inbound delivery.

Goods issue against STO (plant authorization)

Dear All
I have an authorization issue when doing goods issue from Plant 1, against an STO raised for Plant 2.
User has MIGO authorization for 351mvt with authorization object M_MSEG_BWA;
Also he has authorization for all storage locations of Plant 1 and 351mvt with object M_MSEG_LGO; And plant authorization of migo is given for Plant 1 with authorization object M_MSEG_WWA
To issue goods from plant 1 to Plant 2 against the STO raised at Plant 2, what authorization does he require? At the same time he should not able to do GR for POs of plant 2 etc.
Thanks in advance

Hi
I was also in same impression but the SU53 screenshot is showing authorization problem with object M_MSEG_WWA for Plant 2.
User has been given the same for plant 1 (own plant)

Automatic Goods Issue after Outbound delivery and shipment.

Hi,
I am working on LES part.
Could you please explain me how to do Automatic post goods issue for shipments.
(in our scenario where after outbound delivery, picking, packing shipment takes place.)
Can we use VL23 for automatic goods issue for shipments? (or igoods issue is only for outbound deliveries?)
If so what is the selection criteria for background scheduling-Variants?
Please explain me in detail
Thanks a lot.

Anil,
Not sure if I understand your question, Goods Issue is posted for the delivery and not the shipment. In a shipment you can update the actual values for Planned, Check-In, Load Start, Load End etc values. A shipment can have single/multiple deliveries, you can use VL23 for scheduling a background job to do the PGI automatically, use either the standard variants or define your own variant and use that variant to schedule the job.
hith
Sunil Achyut

Good Issue after delivery and packing is done and reversal of goods Issue

Hi All,
I have a below requirment.
1) How we will do the goods Issue using the code. as manuvally we can do it in VL09. I have a delivery number I need to Issue goods Issue for that delivery?
2)If I have a delivery I need to reverse the goods Issue using the abap code. How we will do that is there any function module or BAPI available to reversal of goods Issue.
Basically I need function module or BAPI to do the Goods Issues as well as reversal of goods Issue.
Thanks for your help on this.
Thanks,
Antony.

Hello,
I guess you made some typo error as VL09 is for reverse of goods issue and not for doing goods issue.
Anyways, I suppose you are dealing with Outbound delivery.
Goods issue, VL02n OR WS_DELIVERY_UPDATE.
Reverse Goods issue VL09 OR 'WS_REVERSE_GOODS_ISSUE'
BR,
Diwakar

Allow goods issue after TECO

Dear all,
i have one production order which is technicaly completed. But i want to do material issue as material reservation is pending for that order.Please give focus on issue and explain in detail on TECO and status of production order.
Regards,
Atul

Dear Atul,
In my understanding it is not possible to issue the materials using MB1A for an order that is set with TECO even after making
the settings in BS22.
1.Only confirmations can be made by CO11N/CO15.
2.261/101 movement will be happening if backflush indicator is set and auto GR is allowed.
3.In case if 261 is to be performed using MB1A means in my understanding the only is undo the TECO and then post the
components against the reservation no in MB1A and then change the status once again.
Please check and confirm the same.
Regards
Mangalraj.S
Edited by: Mangalraj.S on Dec 8, 2009 3:01 PM

XCode 3.2.4 - issue after filename or path change

steps to reproduce:
this code use to work, it is designed to display a random image in a UIImage field in my app.
Trying to troubleshoot an issue where I was getting "all black" displaying occasionally, instead of a random.jpg type image, I changed the filenames to make a folder full of random image's filenames even shorter, and changed the relative code to reflect the change: now it NEVER works, although either version builds with no errors. The arc4random number (in blue) matches the item count in my folder full of random images.
Is XCode having trouble clearning out the cruft or perhaps this is a bug ?
-(IBAction)RANDOMPRINT
     //this is the old code which used to work
          int randomInt = (arc4random()%89) +1;
//convert INT to string
          NSString *fileName = [NSString stringWithFormat: @"fingerprint%d.jpg", randomInt];
//load UIImage from the filename
          UIImage *image = [UIImage imageNamed:fileName];
//display UIImage in UIImageView
          [imageView2 setImage:image];
-(IBAction)RANDOMPRINT
     //this is the new code which never works
int randomInt = (arc4random()%89) +1;
//convert INT to string
NSString *fileName = [NSString stringWithFormat: @"print%d.jpg", randomInt];
//load UIImage from the filename
UIImage *image = [UIImage imageNamed:fileName];
//display UIImage in UIImageView
[imageView2 setImage:image];
Tried:
1. I checked the IB file and even rebuilt the "wiring", its done correctly, same way my other image fields work and they are operating correctly.
2. tried doing the "clean all targets" thing but that didnt get it
3. tried restarting laptop
4. ran Repair Permissions ....
Any other suggestion would be most welcome. Perhaps this is a bug ?

ok circling back to my original issue, I may have figured out the problem:
my folder full of images had 3 char padding, ie:
filename001.jpg
filename002.jpg
filename003.jpg
filename061.jpg
and as you can see from my code below that was not reflected in the code statement ala:
(arc4random()%61) +1;
//convert INT to string
          NSString *fileName = [NSString stringWithFormat: @"print%d.jpg", randomInt3];
apparently you have to have it like this:@"print0%d.jpg"
This doesnt strictly make sense to me since the "d" should just be a wildcard for anything that follows.
But somehow adding a zero makes my code work again.
As far as the renaming of Actions and Outlets it would appear under certain circumstances this is a known issue. Research it yourself, if you dont believe it.
In my case, renaming an Action in my code, saving the Project, then renaming it back, disabled the Action. The expected result is that it would "work" again. That didnt happen. This was a rename of one action in the .h file, nothing more.

DataGridColumn renderer issues after headerShift and state change

I have an mx:DataGrid component that is exhibiting some odd behavior. I have defined two states in the containing parent. I have also defined itemRenderers and text values for each of the DataGridColumns based on the state of the parent container, as follows:
<s:Panel>
     <s:states>
          <s:State name="state1"/>
          <s:State name="state2"/>
          </s:states>
     <mx:DataGrid id="myGrid" width="100%" height="100%">
          <mx:columns>
               <mx:DataGridColumn id="dgc1"
                  dataField="value1"
                  headerText="Static Header Text"
                  itemRenderer="com.renderers.StaticRenderer"/>
               <mx:DataGridColumn id="dgc2"
                  dataField="value2"
                  headerText.state1="DGC2 State1 Header Text"
                 headerText.state2="DGC2 State2 Header Text"
                  itemRenderer.state1="com.renderers.value2.State1Renderer"
                 itemRenderer.state2="com.renderers.value2.State2Renderer"
                 excludeFrom="state1"/>
               <mx:DataGridColumn id="dgc3"
                  dataField="value3"
                  headerText.state1="DGC3 State1 Header Text"
                 headerText.state2="DGC3 State2 Header Text"
                  itemRenderer.state1="com.renderers.value3.State1Renderer"
                 itemRenderer.state2="com.renderers.value3.State2Renderer"/>
               <mx:DataGridColumn id="dgc4"
                  dataField="value4"
                  headerText.state1="DGC4 State1 Header Text"
                 headerText.state2="DGC4 State2 Header Text"
                  itemRenderer.state1="com.renderers.value4.State1Renderer"
                 itemRenderer.state2="com.renderers.value4.State2Renderer"
                 excludeFrom="state1"/>
          </mx:columns>
     </mx:DataGrid>
</s:Panel>
This all seems to work fine. As the parent's 'currentState' property changes, the proper columns are included in the layout and the proper text and items are rendered properly.
The issues seem to come in once the user starts to shuffle the columns around. More specifically when the user is in state2 (which has more columns visible) and begins to mix things up. Once the user re-arranges the columns (by dragging) and THEN tries to start flipping back and forth between states, odd things happen:
1. columns that should be excluded seem to be visible (at least the header text would lead you to believe this)
2. empty columns appear (header text value and no item data)
3. columns header text values dissappear (no header values displayed)
4. even columns (like dgc1) which have 'static' values are affected by this (blank values, not visible, etc).
Has anyone experienced this problem, or does anyone have feedback on using this technique to hide/unhide columns in a DataGrid based on a components 'state' property?
Thanks,
Muad'Dib

I have an mx:DataGrid component that is exhibiting some odd behavior. I have defined two states in the containing parent. I have also defined itemRenderers and text values for each of the DataGridColumns based on the state of the parent container, as follows:
<s:Panel>
     <s:states>
          <s:State name="state1"/>
          <s:State name="state2"/>
          </s:states>
     <mx:DataGrid id="myGrid" width="100%" height="100%">
          <mx:columns>
               <mx:DataGridColumn id="dgc1"
                  dataField="value1"
                  headerText="Static Header Text"
                  itemRenderer="com.renderers.StaticRenderer"/>
               <mx:DataGridColumn id="dgc2"
                  dataField="value2"
                  headerText.state1="DGC2 State1 Header Text"
                 headerText.state2="DGC2 State2 Header Text"
                  itemRenderer.state1="com.renderers.value2.State1Renderer"
                 itemRenderer.state2="com.renderers.value2.State2Renderer"
                 excludeFrom="state1"/>
               <mx:DataGridColumn id="dgc3"
                  dataField="value3"
                  headerText.state1="DGC3 State1 Header Text"
                 headerText.state2="DGC3 State2 Header Text"
                  itemRenderer.state1="com.renderers.value3.State1Renderer"
                 itemRenderer.state2="com.renderers.value3.State2Renderer"/>
               <mx:DataGridColumn id="dgc4"
                  dataField="value4"
                  headerText.state1="DGC4 State1 Header Text"
                 headerText.state2="DGC4 State2 Header Text"
                  itemRenderer.state1="com.renderers.value4.State1Renderer"
                 itemRenderer.state2="com.renderers.value4.State2Renderer"
                 excludeFrom="state1"/>
          </mx:columns>
     </mx:DataGrid>
</s:Panel>
This all seems to work fine. As the parent's 'currentState' property changes, the proper columns are included in the layout and the proper text and items are rendered properly.
The issues seem to come in once the user starts to shuffle the columns around. More specifically when the user is in state2 (which has more columns visible) and begins to mix things up. Once the user re-arranges the columns (by dragging) and THEN tries to start flipping back and forth between states, odd things happen:
1. columns that should be excluded seem to be visible (at least the header text would lead you to believe this)
2. empty columns appear (header text value and no item data)
3. columns header text values dissappear (no header values displayed)
4. even columns (like dgc1) which have 'static' values are affected by this (blank values, not visible, etc).
Has anyone experienced this problem, or does anyone have feedback on using this technique to hide/unhide columns in a DataGrid based on a components 'state' property?
Thanks,
Muad'Dib

Goods Issues done with Purchase Price and not MAP

I would like to know on the inventory valuation from moving average price (MAP)/ average the inventory value to First In First Out (FIFO) basis.
FIFO basis is where assumption made that inventory being sold is based on first come first serve basis i.e.
For example you have 1 pc of pen valued at RM 1 and then you buy another pen valued at RM 1.50, your total inventory value would be RM 2.50.
In FIFO basis, if you sold 1 pc of pen then the product cost will be RM 1.00 (i.e. purchase price) as it deemed that the first pen make a way first.
However, in MAP basis, if you sold 1 pc of pen, the product cost would be RM 1.25 as it average cost of both pen.
I have tried using the FIFO rules but it will only take the purchase price if the issuance/sales were done within the same posting period as the GR. If I were to make a GI in the current period, it will not take the purchase price but instead it will be MAP. And then there will be concern if the stocks were available across periods.
Really appreciate any ideas that you may be it standard customizing or enhancements required.

Hi
If you want to apply FIFO rules in real-time basis (day to day operation), then my advice is you should use Batch Management and Batch Valuation features in SAP
If you activate Batch Management with Valuation, then every GR will be valuated differently
For example,
GR 1 on July 01, 2011 - 100 pcs @RM1.00 (batch 001)
GR 2 on July 03, 2011 - 100 pcs @RM1.50 (batch 002)
Then there is GI happening, for example :
GI 1 on July 04, 2011 - 10 pcs
In normal circumstances (without Batch Management), SAP will take the MAP (which is RM1.25) as the price of GI
But if you activate Batch Management with valuation, then you need to specify that you will do GI for batch 001, and SAP will take the price of RM1.00 as the GI price
To ensure FIFO principle, you can also use Batch Determination feature, and make SAP to propose the oldest batch when doing GI transaction in MIGO
Hope that helps
rgds

Goods issue after PO confirmation

Hi, expert
After the production order being confirmed, can production line still staging materail from warehouse to PSA with referende to the same order?

Wang,
Do you mean to say that can the GR be done on the order which is already confirmed with CO11N? or the confirmation more than the order quantity.
GR & confirmation are two separate processes.
But GR as well as confirmation can be done more than the order quantity.
You can have extra GR against the order with T code MB31.
For confirmation more than the order quantity, you need to do settings in confirmation parameters in OPK4. If you set over & underdelivery toleranceis not checked in 'Generally valid setting' tab page.
If you do this then it will enable you to do confirmation more than the order quantity.
Hope this helps you.
SmanS

Price Change in Framework Order for services, with Invoicing Plan

Hi All,
I create a F.O for a single item with Acct assignment"K" and Item Cat"D". The FO has two service masters with a common cost centre, with different tax codes. E.g.One with N2(19%) and the other with V0(0%). This FO is created with a periodic Invoicing plan.
When I run MRIS for the first month, the invoice is posted with the correct values.For the second month when I change the prices randomly for the services at the service level, the invoice is posted with wrong values.
But when I change the prices proportionately,e.g. for Serv1. from 100 to 200,300,400.. and for Serv.2. from 10 to 20,30,40.. respectively, the Invoices are calculated correctly.
Could you please reply the reason for such a system behaviour and also the possible solution or the OSS notes for this issue. I am working in version 4.7.
Thanks,
Suresh Natarajan.

Hi Steve,
1) The invoice is calculated at a random value and I couldn't make out the proportions.
2) Yes, the invoicing plan is Periodic with the Invoicing date as the last day of the month.The order is valid for 2 years(01.01.2007 TO 31.12.2009) and therefore in the invoicing plan of the PO, there will be invoices till 31.12.2009 with the Invoice Block. At the end of everymonth, the block will be removed for processing the Invoice(MRIS).During this time, if there is any change in the prices, we can change it and remove the Invoice Block and save the PO. Here when we change the prices randomly and execute the MRIS, it is throwing wrong values(i.e.the tax calculated is wrong)
Thanks,
Suresh.

Adobe Cloud Price changes from $14.99 for student edition to $19.99 at checkout

http://www.adobe.com/au/education.html - Clearly says $14.99 for student subscription but changes to $19.99 when I go to checkout. I have an edu account and Adobe ID with same address. Can I checkout with the $14.99 price.

Notice the au in the link and also notice the price is A$ 14.99. Is your Adobe ID billing address and credit card for Austrlia or for the United States?

Goods Issue after STO warning "Price change of % in month / for mater"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for