Goods Issue  link with SD

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement to extract data from goods issue (MSEG, MKPF). However there's a need to determine fields like Sold-Tos and Ship-Tos which can only be found in sales document. Are there any means in connecting/linking Goods issue to SD? Thanks!
Best Regards,
Kurtt

Hi,
Check in MKPF Table, Material Documents with Field Trans./Ev. Type having value as WL i.e. Goods Issue for Delivery will be for SD Delivery. Also you can have field Transaction Code having value as VL01N, VL10B, VL10D, etc... if for SD Delivery.
Also in table MKPF, in field "XBLNR" (i.e. Reference Document Number), it populates the Delivery Document No ( VBELN ), get this No and then pass this to tables LIKP and LIPS and get the necessary details.

Similar Messages

  • MB26 ,CO27 - goods issue components with serial number?

    Hi ,everyone!
    I know CO27 and MB26 can do goods issue to production order very easily and quickly!
    But It seems CO27 and MB26 can not work well with the component with serial number.
    I aslo know MB1A and MB1B can post goods issue for component with serial number.But in MB1A and MB11 , it is very difficult to can material by material number quickly while doing more then 100 components issue to one production order.
    And for authorization purpose we restrict MIGO not to use goods issue for production order.
    So I want to ask how CO27 and MB26 do goods issue for the component with serial number?
    Or there is another ways to goods issue component with serial number to production order easily,exclude MB1A,MB11 and MIGO?
    Thanks for any reply!

    Hi Vivek     
    We use CO27 for goods issue to production order ,just like MB1A goods issue to production order.
    But in the BOM components of the production orders ,some semi finished products are with  with serial numbers ,so we can not use CO27 or MB26 to issue these components with serial numbers to production orders!

  • Goods Issue reversal with 262

    Dear Friends,
    Is there any exit to have the same batch number while reversing GI for partial quantity with 262 movement in MB1A which was used in case of 261 movement for Goods Issue against the process order.
    Kindly share your valuable viewpoints for the issue.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Tejas

    Hi,
    Thanks for your prompt reply.But is it feasible to bring same batch no in 262 which was used in 261? See that constraint is already there when multiple batches are issued. But I just wanted to know whether it is possible atleast in case of single batch issued which we can fetch from material document of 261.I have tried but I am unable to find any exit which can work for this purpose.
    If any exit is there then I can further think about multiple batch issue case because at this stage, without knowing exit also I cant go ahead for the same.
    Further material document reversal will not work since user's requirement is for partial reversal  because they are not fully reversing the full GI qty. They are always reversing partial qty mainly.
    Hope you understand my problem.
    Regards,
    Tejas
    Edited by: Tejas  Pujara on Oct 7, 2009 12:55 PM

  • Goods Issue Stock with serial number to asset

    Hi xperts,
    When i GI a stock with serial number to asset (mvmt 241), the serial number is not updated in the asset master. I believe it's due to the asset number has been created before the GI. Is there any way (BADI or user exit) that would allow the serial number to  be updated in the asset master after/during GI postings.
    Thanks in advance.

    HI,
    The serial number is not updated in the asset master & there is no user exit for updating the same . You need to maintain it manually in the Asset master through Tcode AS02. Then after that do the GI,then the serial number would get updated automatically when you manually enter Asset code under  account assignment tab.
    Regards
    Manish Joshi

  • Goods Issues done with Purchase Price and not MAP

    I would like to know on the inventory valuation from moving average price (MAP)/ average the inventory value to First In First Out (FIFO) basis.
    FIFO basis is where assumption made that inventory being sold is based on first come first serve basis i.e.
    For example you have 1 pc of pen valued at RM 1 and then you buy another pen valued at RM 1.50, your total inventory value would be RM 2.50.
    In FIFO basis, if you sold 1 pc of pen then the product cost will be RM 1.00 (i.e. purchase price) as it deemed that the first pen make a way first.
    However, in MAP basis, if you sold 1 pc of pen, the product cost would be RM 1.25 as it average cost of both pen.
    I have tried using the FIFO rules but it will only take the purchase price if the issuance/sales were done within the same posting period as the GR. If I were to make a GI in the current period, it will not take the purchase price but instead it will be MAP. And then there will be concern if the stocks were available across periods.
    Really appreciate any ideas that you may be it standard customizing or enhancements required.

    Hi
    If you want to apply FIFO rules in real-time basis (day to day operation), then my advice is you should use Batch Management and Batch Valuation features in SAP
    If you activate Batch Management with Valuation, then every GR will be valuated differently
    For example,
    GR 1 on July 01, 2011 - 100 pcs @RM1.00 (batch 001)
    GR 2 on July 03, 2011 - 100 pcs @RM1.50 (batch 002)
    Then there is GI happening, for example :
    GI 1 on July 04, 2011 - 10 pcs
    In normal circumstances (without Batch Management), SAP will take the MAP (which is RM1.25) as the price of GI
    But if you activate Batch Management with valuation, then you need to specify that you will do GI for batch 001, and SAP will take the price of RM1.00 as the GI price
    To ensure FIFO principle, you can also use Batch Determination feature, and make SAP to propose the oldest batch when doing GI transaction in MIGO
    Hope that helps
    rgds

  • Goods Issue - SQL Query will not sum

    I have 3 Goods Issue documents with Document Total for each document 10,000 / 20,000 / 30,000 subsequently.
    I want to make query so that it will display like below - where it shows BOTH each of 3 document value (10000/2000/30000) AND the sum of the 3 documents (60000) like below.
    Doc 1 - 10,000
    Doc 2 - 20,000
    Doc 3 - 30,000
    Total = 60,000
    In addition, I would like the ability to choose date range. Basically, something like
    SELECT Document_Total
    FROM Goods_Issue table
    WHERE the_document_date is between 1-SEP-2011 and 31-SEP-2011
    AND the_reference_is _________________
    I have tried many SQL queries, but it displayed either:
    Doc 1 - 10,000
    Doc 2 - 20,000
    Doc 3 - 30,000
    OR
    Total = 60,000
    Please help.

    @Hendry Wijaya      @GordonDu   @malhaar
    Thanks for helps. The SQL query you provided solved 99% of the problem. I just need to make a tweak on the SQL so that it could display the total on the footer. See screenshot below - I uploaded the pics at imageshack as I don't find a way to attach pics in here.
    [See here - Total_at_Footer|http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p213/whitesnowbear/AAAA/Untitled-2.jpg]
    Thanks a bunch.

  • Goods Issue ./ Serial Number Report

    Guys,
    I want to create a report which gives me the Goods Issue details with the items in the goods issue and Serial Numbers processed in those particular goods issues.
    The problem is that with the following coding, it is returning all the Serial Numbers related to the particular item available in SAP and not only those relating to that particular Goods Issue.  So if I have a quantity of 2 Serial Numbers for one item, it is not returning to Serial Numbers for that Goods Issue, but it is returning all Serial Numbers of the System under that Item.
    I suspect that it is a JOIN problem, what do you think?
    Coding is:
    Select
                        T0.DocDate as 'Goods Issue Date'
    ,                    T0.DocNum as 'Goods Issue Reference'
    ,                    T1.ItemCode as 'Item Code'
    ,                    T1.Dscription as 'Item Description'
    ,                    T2.IntrSerial as 'Serial Number'
    ,                    T1.OcrCode as 'Cost Centre'
    ,                    T1.LineTotal as 'Total Cost'
    ,                    T1.U_eReasonCode as 'Reason Code'
    ,                    T0.Comments as 'Remarks'
    From
                        OIGE T0 JOIN IGE1 T1 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry
                                  LEFT OUTER JOIN OSRI T2 ON T1.ItemCode = T2.ItemCode
    Order By
                        T0.DocNum
    Many thanks for your work everyone.
    Regards,
    Vankri

    Hi,
    You can go to Inventory >>> Inventory Report >>> Serial Number Transaction Report. There are a lot of criteria you can choose to generate your own report.
    In your case, choose Dates and Documents tab and then enter your criteria.
    Hope this helps,
    Son.

  • Line item does not exists for Good issue

    Dear All,
    User have created a outbound delivery and perform Post good issue.No billing document has been created yet. Somehow lineitem does not exists in the delivery document however Material Document for Good issue exists with reference to Delivery Document. I tried to reverse the delivery document with reference . No error was occured but still no reversal was updated on Delivery document. I know it is not possible to delete line item without reversal of PGI but system is showing me the status as described
    Prompt response in this regard is highly appreciable
    Thank you,
    Nomi

    Solution has been identified, If goods has been issued then Returns Process wrt Sales Order  solved the problem for my rare process. Goods have been transfered to unristricted stock.
    Thank you all for your support
    Best Regards,
    NoMi

  • EDI/ALE output Post Goods Issue from ME2O

    Dear experts,
    I have to create an outbound IDoc (I assume MBGMCR03) of a Goods issue done with ME2O (mvt type 541).
    So far I have read through:
    http://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=88113280
    http://scn.sap.com/thread/3146742
    http://scn.sap.com/thread/2056081
    but they all talk about printing the message - I need to create an IDoc.
    In NACE:
    - Application "ME"
    - but which condition record can I choose?
    - output types are all set up with print parameters - no EDI/ALE as far as I can see. Do I have to create new ones?
    Can you please help on how to set this up in NACE?
    Next step would be MN21 for the output condition record I assume,
    WE20 to define output for logical system.
    Thank you for your help.
    Best regards,
    Peter

    Dear experts,
    I am a little further now.
    I used output condition WA01 which is already set up in NACE and in MN23 I set up:
    In SP01 I can see the created Spool entries after creating the Good issue with ME2O. So the print out would work. But I need an EDI output....
    I created a new output condition ZWA1 in NACE and set "Processing routines" to EDI.
    I set "Partner functions" to EDI and LS - logical system.
    In MN23 I have:
    I set Event Type to "WA" because when I look at a material document in MB03 it also shows WA:
    In WE20 I have my LS - logicals system and set up the output for MBGMCR03:
    What confuses me is: I have to send the EDI output to a LS - logical system. But in MN23 I can't set the LS - it gives error: "You cannot enter a partner function for output ZWA1"
    No IDoc is created so far - please help. Thank you.
    Best regarsd,
    Peter

  • Goods issue for Reservation

    Hi Gurus,
    I have a question in Material Reservation.Can any expert guide me on below reuirement?
    (i)Can we restrict the goods issue for a material when there is Material reservation exists for material on that day.For Ex.
    Stock-100pcs,reservation on that day -70pcs,
    Goods issue of 40pcs before issuing for reservation should throw me Error.
    (ii)Any Message number for this process?
    (iii)Any user parameter to assign to user for Goods issue only with reference to Reservation?
    Points will be rewarded.
    Regards,
    Khasim

    Hi,
    I had the same requirement at a client where we were implementing. This is how I solved it:
    1) I activated the user exit (not sure now since it was about 6 years back, I think it was MBCF0002) and it would check whether the goods issue was against a reservation or not. If yes, then it would go through. If no, it would check the open reservations which were due for the day and compare quantities. If the remaining stock was not enough to satisfy the reservations, it would give a warning. This was originally made error, then changed to warning when we found that the system prevented emergency issues. Also, people made reservation for higher quantity than required - by mistake in some case and for safety in most cases - just to ensure that they got the required stock even if someone issued out of turn.
    2) Answered in 1. No standard message
    3) No standard parameter. However you can create your own (your ABAP person will know) and check it in the above issue.
    Lakshman

  • Goods issue in Background

    Hi all,
    i would like to do GI to reservation through MB1A in background.
    Here as soon as the system finds the stock, then it should get issued to that reservation in a batch job.
    could anyone provide me some inputs on how to make it happen?
    Thanks
    Diva

    Only thing you can do is to use USER-EXIT for background job for goods issue. With this you can schedule the job for which stock is available with the help of ABAPer.
    Regards
    Amol

  • Fields to be considered in cancellation of goods issue

    hi SAP gurus,
    What are the fields to be considerd for reference while cancelling issued goods in stk transfer with movement type  352.

    HI RAMESH
    i am cancelling goods issue through 352 which is issued using 351 . I want to know what r the fields that u take for reference for a particular goods issue cancellation with 352 mvt type.
    am developing a report in which i have to show 'CANCEL' status when quantities issued thro 351 are cancelled with 352.

  • Very imp planning and goods issue

    i have two questions to ask .
    1)for what purpose cbp is used .that is will it used for any other purpose apart from procurement. what is the full form of mrp1,mrp2,mrp3,mrp4
    2)can a goods issue happens with respect to purcahse requistions/.
    please answer my queries i will appreciate u.

    Dear Meena,
    CBP : It is known as consumption Based planning used for planning procurement of external purchasing material ie. supplied by vendor..
    MRP 1/2/3/4 : MRP stands for Material Requirment planning & 1 to 4 are different views maintained to plan requirement through MRP by system itself.If you do all necessary configuration & update master data for all MRP view you can get direct schedule lines generated after MRP run which will be sent to vendor for delivery of material.In short its automatic procurement process.
    Through Purchase requisition u cannot issue material .This is document to inform about the requirement of material which will be converted into Purchase order ort production order.
    Consumption-Based Planning 
    Purpose
    The central role of MRP is to monitor stocks and in particular, to automatically create procurement proposals for purchasing and production (planned orders, purchase requisitions or delivery schedules). This target is achieved by using various materials planning methods which each cover different procedures.
    Consumption-based planning is based on past consumption values and uses the forecast or other statistical procedures to determine future requirements. The procedures in consumption-based planning do not refer to the master production schedule. That is, the net requirements calculation is not triggered either by planned independent requirements or dependent requirement. Instead, it is triggered when stock levels fall below a predefined reorder point or by forecast requirements calculated using past consumption values.
    MRP Procedures
    In consumption-based planning, the following MRP procedures are available:
    u2022     Reorder point procedure
    u2022     Forecast-based planning
    u2022     Time-phased materials planning
    I hope this will be useful to you.
    Vivek

  • Goods Issue with reference to Purchase Order

    Hi MM Gurus,
    Is there any settings to do Goods Issue with reference to Purchase order?
    I want to capture the material price in purchase order during goods issue instead of standard price or moving average price.
    Thanks in advance
    Dinesh

    Hello Dinesh,
    Batch valuation is similar to split valuation. Here is the link on how batch valuation works.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/25/283db54f7811d18a150000e816ae6e/content.htm
    Please check in sandbox environment before using.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards
    Arif Mansuri

  • Goods Issue with Purchase Account Management

    Hi,
    in one of our foreign subsidiaries we have to run the MM-Purchase Account Management. These subsidiaries will be delivered by Cross-Company Replenishment deliveries with intercompany-invoicing. Every Goods receipt for such an replenishment delivery will be posted in the receiving subsidiary, besides the normal bookings on the u2018Goods/Invoice Received clearing accountu2019 and u2018Stock accountsu2019, on additional purchasing accounts. Now itu2019s possible that the goods have to be returned to the delivering plant due to any problems. To send back the goods we use again a SD-delivery (triggered also by an MM-IC-Purchase order) and with this SD-delivery we want also to post the goods issue in the subsidiary. But as the goods receipt has been posted on these special additional purchasing accounts, the goods issue has also to be posted on these special additional purchasing accounts (The target is to correct these purchasing accounts to the ammount of the returned goods). But it seems that this is not possible because of the MM-Account determination which doesnu2019t allow to post on these special purchasing accounts with an SD-transaction. Iu2019m no MM-expert but is there any possibility to post on this purchase accounts also when posting a goods issue in SD? If not in standard, are there any User-Exits in the account determination?
    Regards
    Stephan
    Edited by: Stephan Nadler on Aug 12, 2008 1:20 PM

    Hello Dinesh,
    Batch valuation is similar to split valuation. Here is the link on how batch valuation works.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/25/283db54f7811d18a150000e816ae6e/content.htm
    Please check in sandbox environment before using.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards
    Arif Mansuri

Maybe you are looking for

  • URGENT: Folder disappeared. No trace what so ever...

    Ladt night, I was working on files belonging to a web project I've been on the past 8-10 days. The software used was Photoshop CS3, Dreamweaver CS4, BBEdit and perhaps I had Transmit running too. Eventually, I shut the computer down as I've done ever

  • What is used in place of skeleton interface?

    So in Java 2 SDK, Standard Edition, v 1.2 the skeleton interface was deprecated - i.e. should not be used since it will eventually be removed. So what on the server side allows for the marshalling and unmarshalling of objects? Is it RemoteObject or R

  • Java Pet Store Deployathon - wls 6.1 deplyment problem

    Hi All, I get following exception when i run build.bat on step 6 for building petstore.ear file. I have checked all the required resources for compiling the ejb classes are there in the required structure. EXCEPTION org.xml.sax.SAXException: Could no

  • Import PMI from SolidWorks  to PDF 3D

    Hi all , I have noticed that PDF 3D (V9 Pro extended)did not import PMI data from Solidworks 2008 is this issue resolved in the new Solidworks's 2009 release (if available)? Thanks Regards

  • My Router Access Rule is getting deleted

    Hello, I set up an xbox360 with a static IP address on my home network.  My firewall is set to maximum and I need to set up some access rules for xbox live.  This was not difficult but what I've found is that after a few days the access rule is sudde