GR Non-valuated indicator

In case of multiple account assignment, why GR is always non-valuated?

hi
it is std SAP behaviour , u have to create different line items for different account assingments
Please kindly check your release, the functionality for GR valuated was not provided if you are using
multiple account assignment. Therefore you don't have any accounting document generated.
It was not develop yet even for release ECC 6 at earlier support package but recently EHP 4 you
may have this functionality.
regards
kunal

Similar Messages

  • GR non valuated indicator not appearing in PO

    Dear Experts,
    The PR and PO has been created in R/3 system from shopping cart for a AAC. For this AAC the GR non valuated indicator is checked in R/3.
    In PR it came correctly but in PO its not checked.
    Can you please suggest what went wrong, is there any settings missing?
    Thank you.
    Regards,
    Abhishek

    Hi Abhishek,
    Also, please check the supplier setting in ECC (XK03).
    Hope this helps
    Cheers,
    Yateesh

  • GR non-valuated indicator controlled by the Account Assignment Category

    Dear Gurus,
    In standard customizing, is it possible to do a configuration so that the GR non-valuated indicator in the PO  is controlled by the Account Assignment Category. For example:
    1. For Acct Assignment Category = A (Asset), the GR non-valuated indicator is disabled (grey out)
    2. All other Acct Assignment Categories, the GR non-valuated indicator is enabled (not grey out)
    Appreciate your kind feedback.

    Which checkbox or radio button specifically ?
    It's not the 'GR non-valuated' checkbox or the 'GR non-val binding' checkbox right ?
    I can't find any radio button for 'GR non-valuated' so that I can set it to 'display' or 'hide' either.
    Perhaps I should elaborate a bit more:
    Disabled = Box is grey out = Non Modifiable = Cannot tick even if you wanted to, Cannot untick even if you wanted to
    Enabled = Box not grey out = Modifiable = Can tick if you wanted to, Can untick if you wanted to

  • Production order--GR-Non valuated indicator

    Dear All.
    In which condition the system automatically tick the GR-Non valudated indicator of  the good receipt view for  the production order .
    Best reagrds
    Fanny

    Prasobh
    We use make-to-order and sale order stock nonvaluated,and each production order have relative sale order.but when plan production order thansfer production order,the GR-non valuated indicator for the goods receipts view is ticked automatically. Then the sale order stock is non-valuated and the production order will settle to sale order. I check all the configuration but  all is ok, so I change the sale order in the production order. then is ok.
    It is a strange thing!
    my english is bad,maybe the descreption isn't clear.
    Best regards
    Fanny

  • Use of GR receipt , IR receipt and GR - non valuated options in PO

    I want to know what is the use and effect of GR receipt , IR receipt and GR - non valuated options in PO.
    Pls help.

    Hi
    GR-Non valuated:
    Set the indicator if goods receipts involving this material are not to be valuated. The valuation of the purchase order item will then take place at the time of invoice verification.
    This indicator must be set in the case of multiple account assignment for example.
    IR receipt:
    Specifies whether an invoice receipt is linked to the purchase order item.
    You can not do LIV if this indicator is set.
    If the indicator is not set, the goods are to be delivered free of charge.
    Goods Receipt;
    Specifies whether a goods receipt is linked to the purchase order item.
    You can not do GR if you set this indicator.
    If GR indicator is set, GR-non valuated Indicator also need to be set.
    Cheers!
    ***reward If Useful (RIU)

  • GR non-valuated box automatically set in backend PO

    Hi ...
    I am doing extended classic scenario with SRM 5.0 and ECC 6.0 system,
    When I create a purchase order with multiple account assignments in SRM then the "GR non-valuated" box is set automatically in backend PO when the PO is replicated in SAP. From other SDN threads, I could see that this is a standard design. But couldn't accept that as business might want to have valuated goods receipt with cost distribution.
    Are there any solution to fix this issue? Please suggest. Thanks.

    Hi
    GR Non Valuated indicator comes from account assignment
    Please check account assignment configuration
    SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Account Assignment>maintain Acc Assignment
    Select your Acc Assginment and go to details and check whether the GR Non Valuated is ticked or not
    Regards
    Trinath

  • PO Item : Delivery Tab - Goods Receipt and GR Non-Valuated

    Dear all,
    User highlighted for a PO which she was not able to do GR. When checked, we found that the line item, with account assignment "K" - the Goods Receipt and GR Non Valuated indicator is unticked. User further claim that, she did not untick both of these checkbox.
    These were the steps which i have done:
    1. Checked the config: IMG > MM > Purchasing > Account Assignment > Maintain Account Assignment Categories.
    Here i have confirmed that Goods Receipt, GR Non Valuated are already pre selected.
    2. Scanned thru the whole list of User Exit found under ME21N. No enhancement related to these two fields were found.
    3. Manually create a PO, with similar data in test server -- both the checkbox are pre selected by default.
    Given the checking done above: If user did not manually untick the checkbox -- where else / how else can Good Receipt and GR Non Valuated indicator be unticked ?
    Please .. appreciate it if someone could shed some lights on this area.
    Thanks in advance.

    Dear All,
    Many thanks for the prompt reply.
    Siva,
    In this case, the PO line item doesn't involve a material number. Therefore PIR is eliminated.
    Jurgen,
    Yes, i did actually simulate from scratch, the creation of this PO. Both the goods receipt and gr non valuated checkbox were actually ticked. It didn't jive with user's feedback which claim the boxes were originally unticked already.
    Sudhir,
    Yup, as material number is not involved, therefore PIR and material master is eliminated.
    Thru out the day, am quite glad to make some discovery. The PO was actually converted from a PR. And guess what ?
    In the PR itself, these two checkbox were already unticked ! I then simulated this scenario - create PR with untick checkbox and convert it to PO. And voila ! in the PO, both checkbox were untick as well.
    Now am in the midst of finding out -- why in the PR, at the very first place, goods indicator and gr non valuated are unticked. Checking with the process owner, as the PR was generated automatically.
    Thank you very much !

  • GR non valuated ticker in account assignment category

    Dear Experts,
    A customer have set up their own account assignment category. In this they have both the "GR non valuated" and "GR non valuated firm" ticker set.
    I cannot see that this makes any difference to having only the GR non valuated firm ticker set?
    If the "GR non valuated firm" ticker is set, you always have to have GR and also always non vaulated GR
    With "GR non vaulated", you have to have non valuated every time to do GR (but it is optional to do GR)
    So, if you have set the first, setting the second makes no difference?
    Am I right?
    rgds
    GAR

    Hi,
    They are completely different setting (for different purpose).  Once both indicators are set in OME9 for your related AAC, then when you are maintaining PO with such AAC, the GR-non-valuated indicator will be set defaulted and greyed out (i.e. you can't be able to deactivate).  If only GR-non-valuated indicator is set, then this indicator checkbox will be defaulted (but not greyed out) and therefore, you can change if you wish to.  Yet, these settings are not relevant to the case of raising multi account assigned PO as in this particular case, SAP will automatically set the GR-non-valuated indicator checkbox regardless of if you have made any settings in OME9.
    Cheers,
    HT

  • Creating accruals for GR non-valuated

    Hi Guys,
    By using the multiple account assignment feature in PO, it activates the GR non-valuated indicator that prevent the MIGO from creating its intermidiary transaction:
    <b>Acc/DR Expenses accounts
    Acc/CR GI/IR Account 400301</b>
    Is there possibility to create accruals for the GR non-valuated received goods automatically in case the invoice was not received before the month closing??
    If not so from were I can get a report of the opened balances to perform the accrual process manually???
    Your reply is highly appreciated

    Thanks for your replies,
    But what report can I generate to give the list of Gr non-valuated received goods
    I want a report that can show the total value of the received goods (related only to the non-valuated PO), the PO number, the internal order/Cost center, etc.....
    Please this report is very important for me and I don't think it doesn't exists.
    <b>Yor reply is highly appreciated</b>

  • ERROR-With non-valuated GR, please also enter GR indicator

    Hi,
    We are on SRM 5.0 SP12,Extended Classic scenario.
    For all PO's which have no follow on docs created,whenever the
    Confirmation-Related Invoice Verification (GR_BASEDIV) and Confirm
    Performance of Service/Goods Receipt(GR_IND) fields are changed,the
    changes are not transferred to ECC backend .The SRM PO status is set
    to "ERROR IN PROCESS" and in RZ20 we see the folling messages:
    PurchOrder 5000012063: Purchase order still contains faulty items
    PO 5000012063: With non-valuated GR, please also enter GR indicat or
    PO 5000012063: Instance 5000012063 of object type PurchaseOrder c ould
    not be changed
    Has anybody come across such an issue?

    Hi,
    We also faced similar issues. In such cases, do minor changes to line item of the PO quantity / price or other fields which are relevent for creation of the new versions of the PO.
    Then use Function module BBP_PO_EXE_TRANSFER to push all the changes along with GR Indicator of the PO in to ECC.
    In you case, the changes to PO is not triggerig the new Version of the PO. Hence it is not updating in back end.
    Thanks
    Giri

  • GR and GR Non Val indicator in R/3 PO for multiple account assigned SC's

    Hi,
    We are on SRM 3.0(EBP 4.0) and R/3 4.7.
    We have implemented the BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK badi for setting or clearing the GR and IR indicators under certian conditions.
    But for Multiple account assigned SC's we get an error message "06181 With non-valuated GR, please also enter GR i ndicator ".
    We have tried implementing note# 872000, but this has not solved the issue.
    The PO's get created only if we force the GR indicator when transferring the data into R/3.
    It seems clear that while creating the PO the system is encountering the GR Non Val indicator but not the GR indicator, so its throwing the error message (we get the same error message when we create the PO from R/3 with GRnon val indicator checked and GR ind unchecked).
    The proposed solution is that in the same BADI, along with clearing the GR indicator, we will also clear the GR non val indicator.
    This can solve the issue if the indicators are transferred as it is from EBP.
    But can anyone tell me if these indicators are also checked/changed in any FM/program in R/3 before the PO is created?
    Is there any customizing setting which is affecting this particular behaviour?
    Regards,
    Srivatsan

    Hi Srivatsan ?
    In ECC, you have a configuration point :
    Materials Management->Account Assignment->Maintain Account Assignment Categories
    Here you can untick the indicator you want by account assignment category;
    Kind regards,
    Yann

  • Stock Transport for Non Valuated Account Assigned Material

    Hi Experts,
    I have to satisfy some unique requirement from my demanding FICO team to make certain process work our way.
    Following is the scenario...
    1. Plant A and plant B belongs to the same company.
    2. Plant A makes material X (non valuated, ind/coll indicator = 1).
    3. X calls for sub-assembly Y (non valuated, ind/coll indicator = 1) which is a make item in plant B. <b>X and Y belongs to different Profit Centers</b>
    4. Sales order placed at plant A for material X.
    5. MRP runs and creates a stock transport order in plant A to buy the non valuated material Y from plant B. STO is account assigned to the sales order.
    6. Plant B makes the material Y by creating a production order that is account assigned to the same sales order and does PGI to ships it out to plant A.
    7. Plant A GRs the material Y and this puts it in sales order stock. No value move, just qty move. Also no FI document created.
    8. Plant A issues component Y to the production order created for material X. Cost of Y doesn't show up in the production order as it is non valuated.
    9. Upon settlement of the production order in Plant B, the <b>ACTUAL</b> cost gets settled to the sales order in plant A. So at the time of settlement the <b>profit center switch happens for Y (i.e. the profit center for Y changes to match X's profit center)</b>
    This is a beautiful process from logistics point of view. BUT, my FICO has unique requirement for inter company sales for our organization. For them to consider a process as inter company sales, the following constraints has to be met...
    <b>1. Ownership of material remains with producing profit center until consumption by the receiving object. (with the above mentioned process the profit center switch happens during prod. order settlement)
    2. Cost for the consuming profit center will be moving average, standard cost or planned cost. (we are dealing with non-valuated materials and the settlement happens at actual cost)</b>
    I need your expertise to help me define a work aroud. I am thinking about a lot of options to somehow make it work but can't seem to get solutions. Following are my thoughts...
    1. Is it possible to possible to make the settlement with planned cost instead of actual cost?
    2. Is it possible to make a profit center switch during consumption rather during settlement?
    3. Is it somehow possible to create an underlying FI document during GR at plant A? (I know SAP does not create a FI doc. for non valuated materials).
    4. Or can plant B send an invoice to plant A for the STO? (I believe this can be done for cross-company STO) I am thinking doing an Invoice Receipt at plant A instead of doing a settlement might show up the cost for Y in the production order for X.
    An IR with the planned cost would be an awesome solution to get the buy-in from FICO. Can this be done?
    I hope you don't mind my lengthy message... Waiting for some positive response.
    Thanks.

    Anyone??? This is kinda urgent?

  • Field "GR Non-valuated" in tab "Goods receipt" of the production order

    Hi,
    When creating a production order, the field "GR Non-valuated" in tab "Goods receipt" is checked by default, due to my assessment customizing.
    This field indicates to the system that it should not create any accounting document, whereas I would like to create one. Does anyone know how to withdraw this automatically check?
    FYI, I do not use COPA and the very basic of CO-PC and I would like to create automatically a default assessment rule (cost center).
    Thanks for your help.
    Ronan

    Hi,
    please note that this is not an MM, but a PP-SCF related issue. It does not belong to the forum ERP MM.
    The indicator AFPOD-WEUNB is set automatically as soon                  
    as you do not settle your production order to category 'MAT' (see                    
    settlement rule). If the order is not settled to a material, then the                
    Goods Receipt will not be valuated and the flag G/R Non-valuated (WEUNB)             
    is set. Only when you settle to a Material is the G/R Non-valuated not              
    set, and you will  receive FI postings in the case of such a movement.               
    This is standard system behaviour.                                                   
    Please review the following notes relating to settlement rules: 518496,              
    400400.                                                                               
    To make sure that the GR-Nonvaluated flag is not set in the                          
    production order, field KZBWS must already be filled with 'M' in the                 
    customer requirement. For that, please set the field KZBWS='M' for the               
    requirement class that is used (see 'General Customizing' in note                    
    459734). PLAF-KZBWS (indicator:valuation of special stock).  
    Regards,
    Edit

  • In PO screen -GR Non valuated

    Dear experts
    GR- Non valuated  Tick box in u201Cdisable modeu201D in the item level (delivery tab). How can I change as the editable mode ?
    And what is the actual purpose?
    Regards
    Amsi

    hi
    plz check that If ur using multiple account ssignment for the asset
    then this indicator will be in disply mode
    plz corect me if i am worng on following statement
    in 4.7 version if u select multiple acct assignment then this tick will be there and it will e in didply mode
    i think in ECC 6.0 there are some corrections or some settings for this
    regards
    KI

  • Non valuated material and free materials

    hi,
    friends
    pl provide me the difference between non valuated and free materials.
    thanks
    durga prasd

    Hi Durga Prasad
    Free material: These materials are valuated ,but we procure it free of charge.So while creating a PO for free materials then in the PO we can check the Free of charge indicator.Then if you do a GR aganist this PO,there are 2 scenarios ie
        If the material is valuated at moving average price,then there will not be any accounting documents at the time of GR.But the moving average price gets recalculated since your stock level increases.
    If the material is valuated at Standard price,then accounting documents gets generated at the time of GR even if its frree of charge delivery.
    If we dont have a PO,then also if we want to do GR for free material,then this can be donr using the movement type 511.Transaction code is MIGO.Goods receipt with reference to others
    Non -Valuated Material:This type of material is not valuated in any valaution areas.
    (But if you are refering to non valuated material type(UNBW) then its different scenario)
    Hope this will help you
    Reward if useful
    Thanks and Regards
    SHYAM.R

Maybe you are looking for

  • ACR and Mac

    Have Adobe Photoshop CS5 and having a problem installing the new RC of ACR 6.3 so I can use my Nikon D7000. Error says "Update is not applicable". Any help?

  • Colour a line in so10

    hello,      I have created a standard text in SO10 which I Include in Smartform.  Is it possible to colour one of the lines in RED.      The command FONT COLOR = 'RED' does not work.      Please help me with this problem. thank you, <MOVED BY MODERAT

  • How do I uninstall 'Apple Mobile Device Support'?

    I tried to uninstall all Apple software as I was having difficulty with the latest upgrade but I stupidly did it in a random order. I now can't get rid of this last piece of software or download the new verison of itunes. Can anybody help?

  • Calling a class/function in a view

    Hi , I want to instantiate a external class in a view, how to achieve that ?... For say ... Need to call/instantiate function /SAPSRM/IF_PDO_DO_PARTNER_BASE~UPDATE_ITEM_PARTNERS (public) of class /SAPSRM/CL_PDO_BO_SC in the view of Webdynpro componen

  • DEBMAS text mapping

    Hi all, we send DEBMAS-IDocs out of a SAP 4.7 system to XI. The target is a MS SQL db (connected via JDBC), where the segments are mapped into several tables. I have difficulties to map texts from IDoc to SQL-table. In the SQL-DB there is only one ta