Graphic design & choice of display

Hidy,
I'm a novice graphic designer and seeking advice from designers. I would like to know what your vision is on the choice of a display for graphic design purposes. I heard a rumor that the LED-backlit displays aren't really useful for graphic design since they wouldn't represent true image, is this correct? Would you go back and use a Mac like the iMac 24" Core 2 Duo 2.16 just because its display is LCD? Or would you go with the future and buy those new iMacs with LED backlit displays? What could be the advantage or disadvantage? Any real life situation experiences? Any suggestions?
Cheerio !

I suppose the best answer, if you are a novice graphic designer, is to ask if you intend to do color matching with a calibrated measurement device. If not, you choice of display really doesn't matter.
You cannot do simple visual color matching with any LCD or LED-backlit driven panel, whether matter or glossy, as none produce sufficiently accurate color. You must instead use specialized tools like the Pantone matching system and calibrate or set your display for optimum accuracy, while clearly understanding that you must trust the software, and not your eyes.
I do a great deal of graphics work, and find glossy—as opposed to matte—screens difficult to work with. While their highly saturated color makes them good wide-screen DVD playback platforms, the reflective glare from ambient light is annoying. If you choose a glossy display, which is pretty much all you can these days, be sure to set up your environment so as to minimize reflective light sources such as lamps and windows in your workspace.
For the most part, backlighting is backlighting. Backlights driven by light emitting diodes were introduced almost solely to eliminate the undesirable component parts of cold cathode fluorescent lamps and make displays ultimately easier to recycle, lowering their adverse impact upon the environment.

Similar Messages

  • I've got a MacBook pro 15' running 10.6.6. I want to use an external monitor for my graphic design work running Adobe software and thought I'd try an HD TV. I ran a Mini Display to HDMI lead to the TV but the picture quality was disappointing.

    I've got a MacBook Pro 15' running 10.6.6. I want to use an external monitor for my graphic design work using Adobe software and thought I'd try an HD TV. I ran a Mini Display to HDMI lead to the TV but the picture quality was disappointing. I also tried a Mini Display to VGA lead and that wasn't much better. I tried all variations of resolutions in System prefs - Displays but nothing helped. Am I getting something wrong? Thanks all.

    In addition to pixel density, you are up against the translation driver card in the TV.
    If you read the fine print of computer-resolution-capability in the TV user guide, you will see a chart as tall as the manual page.  At the top is the smallest resolution capable, at the bottom is the full use of the 1080p in the TV.
    Mac falls into the top 25% of the page, maxing out at 1366x768 often.  This is because the TV control card is expected to do too much of the work, but is not designed for computer-monitor processing.
    I looked at the resolution charts on 2 TVs before deciding to buy a 1080p LCD monitor that has a TV interface/connector.  Computer monitor first, TV second.  But the thing is only 27 in.  Good thing TV is not as important to me as it is to others.

  • As a graphic designer, I am creating ePubs that will be seen on iPads running, ios5, ios6 and ios7.  Each version displays the page differently.  Is there a way to make the display consistent on all systems?

    As a graphic designer, I am creating ePubs that will be seen on iPads running, ios5, ios6 and ios7.  Each version displays the page differently.  Is there a way to make the display consistent on all systems?

    As a graphic designer, I am creating ePubs that will be seen on iPads running, ios5, ios6 and ios7.  Each version displays the page differently.  Is there a way to make the display consistent on all systems?

  • Display for graphic design application

    Hi every body,
    Today i'm going searching my new iMac 20" Dual Core and i want to know if you think the 20" display is a good stuff to make graphic design application.
    We work now on 19" ViewSonic CRT flat screen.
    Thanks all.
    Excuse my english, i'm a french canadian...

    Bonjour Wayne99,
    I use my iMac for Photoshop and Illustrator all the time, and the 20" monitor is PERFECT!
    My only beef with it is the color setting, I changed mine to Adobe RGB 1998, because the default 'iMac color' setting is way too...bright/faded looking.

  • Best way (folio/bounding) to display a printed portfolio? (Graphic Design question)

    Hi all,
    Apologies if this isnt posted in the correct forum (but I wasnt able to find any mainstream graphic design forums, I know there is ultrashock but that's more flash based, if anyone could point me to some would be great.)
    Any how my question is what is the best portfolio type (paper/binded folder/display sheets) to display printed graphic design work in to potential clients or employers etc?
    I had been using protective sheets, but then a client of mine showed me what someone else had done for them and it was displayed in a huge thick A3 bound portfolio (you couldnt see or tell how each peice of paper was bound to the edge). I'm thinking that's what I really need and really professional type looking folio presented like that, but I don't know of what you would call that type of folio/bounding etc.
    Any help would be great

    I prefer to do wire-o because you can change the pages out as your portfolio changes. I also like to have vellum slip sheets in-between because it looks more professional as well has assure that the prints do not stick together. I prefer to go with printed plastic transparent covers with an emboss as well as foil stampings with double hit blacks consisted of gloss UV coatings in patterns of textiles, but that gets costly.
    Other then that, I think you will have more success creating an on line portfolio. Most people don't have the time to look at hard copies, but it's good to have a back up hard copy for face to face situations.

  • Graphic design with the MBP (no retina display)

    im a graphic design student and was wondering if the macbook pro (non retina display) would be good enough for everyday designing.  I would upgrade to the i7 and 8 gb of ram.

    Yes - it would work just fine: and if you ever wanted to add a larger monitor for your home studio, you could do that as well.
    Assuming that you'll be using the Adobe CC suite for students?
    Clinton

  • Graphic Design? Would imac 24" be good choice?

    I am a Graphic Designer, currently using Creative Suite 2 (soon to be upgraded to CS3) and I need a new Mac for home. A Powermac takes up too much space, so I'm thinking about an imac with a 24" monitor and I have a few questions for the experts:)
    Which imac would work best for graphics?
    Is the monitor acurate for Pantone color matching?
    Is the 24"monitor on the imac clear and bright?
    Is Leopard a stable OS?
    I also need an (inexpensive) color laser printer. Any suggestions?
    Thanks a bunch!
    Suzi (Machead since the beginning of Mac history)

    Suzi,
    1. All of howwow's points were spot on.
    2. I have the 24-inch iMac and the screen is brilliant. Bright and sharp. I personally bought a BTO machine with just the CPU upgrade to 2.8GHz. I use Illustrator and Photoshop everyday in building websites, but I am not a color freak like some people (http://www.kokias.com) I know.
    3. For serious color calibration look at:
    a. http://www.colorvision.com - Spyder
    b. http://pantone.com/pages/products/product.aspx?pid=79&ca=2&s=0 - Huey and its upgrades
    4. Backup software. SuperDuper! is great and is expected to be Leopard-compatible within a few weeks.
    5. External hard drive. Buy the largest you can afford. Get one with a quad (USB, FW400, FW800, eSATA) interface. You need one large enough to backup your internal drive and then even more capacity for Time Machine. Take a look at drives from OWC at http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/firewire/1394/USB/EliteAL/400+USB2/
    6. Memory. The iMac now supports up to 4GB of RAM. Buy the minimum configuration from Apple and then buy a 4GB kit from a 3rd party. It costs only $96 USD for 4GB from (for example) http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Other%20World%20Computing/53IM2DDR4GBK/
    7. Printer. I really like our new Brother HL-4070CDW. Color, laser, duplex, wireless. More at http://www.brother-usa.com/printer/ModelDetail.aspx?ProductID=HL4070CDW and only $473 from Amazon at http://tinyurl.com/2nd5wz
    8. Adobe and Leopard. More at http://www.adobe.com/support/products/pdfs/leopardsupport.pdf

  • How much ram and processing power in my imac will meet my graphic design needs?

    Hi,
    I'm in the market for a new imac. I'm trying to figure out how much ram I'll need and which processor will be sufficient for my graphic design needs.
    I'm gonna need it to be robust enough to have InDesign, Photoshop, and Illustrator open at once along with spotify, safari with many tabs open, and a couple other apps including evernote and game from time to time. Also, I'm gonna be managing a good deal of fonts in font explorer. How much ram and processing power will I need in my imac to keep everything snappy with all these apps going at the same time?
    Any advice on this would be much appreciated. Feel free to include any other relevant information you think I should know.
    Thanks, Nick

    Computers are out of date when you open the box
    Ok, getting serious, that iMac should be a viable workhorse for what you want for a good five years, and taht depends on how much ram you put in it, add really fast external storage, and so on.
    Didn't throw this in earlier so as to not influence the discussion: my daughter is the senior art director, VP, at a graphics design firm in NYC.  Has been in the business for a number of years.  When she changed out her Mac at work, bought, or company bought, the 27" iMac model just before the latest, with maxed out CPU/GPU, and storage.  They maxed the memory to 32 GB for her, then added a 30" Apple cinema display so she has almost 5' of display in front of her.  There is nothing she cannot have open all spread across that display area.  She works almost exclusively in print media, occassionally condescends to do web stuff.  And has a massive array of RAID drives hanging on it.  But that is a setup an individual would be hard pressed to go with.
    At home she uses a MacBook Pro with top cpu and display but that is all.
    The point, just how massive do you want to go depends on how fast you have to work; in the office where time is money you need tons of horsepower.  At home, you scale it to your abilitty to juggle other tasks at the same time.
    I think your choices have been great, the discussion has focused on what is important and especially what can and cannot be changed in the future.
    Best of luck setting this up.

  • It's the Mac book air good for graphic design and video editing ?

    I'm into graphic design for clothing logos etc. and I'm a photographer my question is, is the Mac book air good for these things?

    ideally a 15" would be best for same, as referring to the 15" macbook Pro.
    For a photographer, which I used to be long ago, either the Air or Pro are close in form factor for travel with only one moving part, and SSD.
    The retina display in combination with the 15" would be idea as best choice for photo editing and graphic design.
    http://www.apple.com/macbook-pro/features-retina/

  • IMAC + Graphic Design

    Are any professional graphic designers using the new Imacs. I graduated earlier this year and have been thinking about getting a mac for a while now. My PC just crapped out about a week ago, so it is definitely time to buy a new comp. I know that getting a Mac Pro would be the best choice, but I can't really afford that option right now. I will be running Photoshop, Illustrator and Indesign mostly.

    I agree with some of the comments below regarding the graphic design apps. I actually have the CS3 Master collection on my iMac and it runs all of them fine although the video editing is a bit slow. For static 2d design Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign, Flash and Dreamweaver all run pretty smooth. I also have Vista installed via Bootcamp with CS3 Design suite and again they all run pretty smooth although a bit faster running on the Mac end. I Also use Spyder2 to calibrate the display and have a second 20" display as well.  the 24" iMac will suit your needs just fine, and don't bother with the 2.8 GHZ you won't notice any increase in speed with any of these apps unless you do video editing, you'll just pay more. One thing I do recommend you do is buy more RAM, not through Apple because they charge to much, I have 4 gigs of Mushkin RAM installed on mine for about $200. It's very easy to install on your own. Buy your iMac with 1 gig and upgrade on your own.
    --Brian

  • Mac Pro buying advice for Graphic Design

    I am going to be purchasing a Mac Pro and was hoping I could get some advice on the right set-up for what I do. I use CS4 heavily on the Mac for graphic design spending a good amount of time in Photoshop working with files that can easily go over a few gigs (when working on convention booth displays, etc.). I also use my Mac for casual video editing in iMovie, and use Apple's other great offerings like iWeb, iPhoto, etc.
    My main questions are:
    - I'm leaning towards the Quad. I keep my Macs for at least 5 years. Is that a good decision?
    - If I do go with the Quad should I opt for the 2.66 or 2.93?
    - At the moment I am running 8 Gig on my current Mac, should I configure this new one with 8 Gig?
    - Is the Radeon the correct card choice for a heavy Photoshop user?
    I hope these questions aren't ones that have been asked a thousand times. It's a lot of money to spend (especially right now) and I want to make sure I configure it correctly for what I do.
    Thank you in advance for your input.

    Hi hatter,
    Thank you again for your responses. That really helps clear up the RAM situation. I think that is part of what swayed me towards the 8-Core as opposed to the Quad. Please correct me if I am wrong, but looking at prices of RAM on Crucial I see that if I wanted today to put 16 Gigs of RAM in a Quad-Core it would cost me $1200 (for 4 4-Gig chips using all slots). However if I was going to put 16 in the 8-Core I could do it for $400 (8 2-Gig chips using all slots. Actually it would only be $200 more since I configured my Mac with 4 2-Gig chips from Apple for an extra $100). Seems like having more slots open will save me money when I want to upgrade ram since I don't have to go for the 4-Gig chips. That coupled with the theory that Snow Leopard is around the corner and will take advantage of the 8-Core it seems like opting for a low end 8-Core vs a high end Quad is worth the $300 difference.
    Side note: Are there any reports that say running more 2GB chips is worse than running fewer 4GB chips? Just curious.
    Even though I understand that the processor speed makes a difference I am hoping that the advantages of more RAM slots and future benefits of Snow Leopard, CS5 and other apps that will take advantage of the 8-Core in the near future will make it the right decision. If I could afford a faster 8-Core obviously I would opt for that but with a jump of $1,400 to the next processor speed I am afraid it is out of my reach.
    Regardless I'm sure I will feel very spoiled as soon as I unwrap this beast and get it up and running. Then in a year I'll give into the temptation of slipping a SSD in for the boot drive and I'll have to find a way to contain my excitement. I have a SSD on my laptop and WOW what an amazing difference it really is.
    Wow, these forums are great. I can't believe how helpful all of your responses have been. I feel much more informed and was able to order my Mac today not feeling like I was shopping in the dark.
    Thank you all again!

  • 24" iMac for Graphic Design studio workstation?

    Hi there, I've been using macs since the early 90s for graphic design and have always bought their "professional" models, ie towers. These days it seems the line between iMacs and towers is getting a bit blurred... iMacs are pretty darn powerful. So I need to add a workstation to the design studio and am considering just getting a 24" iMac instead of a tower + apple display. I use Adobe CS2 apps (photoshop, indesign, illustrator, etc.) Rarely, I deal with 500meg layered photoshop images, but I don't do any sound/video stuff.
    So my big question... is the iMac good enough for a full time graphic designer's workstation or should I stick with a tower? The difference is over a $grand.
    G5 tower Mac OS X (10.4.8)

    The 24" iMac is a perfect match for a graphic designer.
    On the plus side, the large screen is actually 4 inches larger than the smallest Cinema Display (20"), meaning great value. Secondly, you have the small form factor and the conveinience of an all-in-one unit, and the RAM is extremely easy to upgrade, with a ceiling of 3GB; plenty to run Photoshop or Aperture. The Nvidia graphics card is very potent as well; a must for people working with high-res images.
    On the downside, you still won't get the sheer performance that a tower such as the Mac Pro will offer. You also won't get the expandability. You can't upgrade the graphics card in the iMac. You also can't upgrade the hard drive easily, and USB and firewire card upgrades (necessary to keep up with todays latest connection methods for digital cameras) are out of the question.
    The 24" iMac is superb. It will give you the horsepower to run even a small graphics design business. But if you are serious about graphic design as a career, still go for a tower. You will be glad you did. I wouldn't be surprised if you found yourself selling the iMac and upgrading your system 3 or 4 years from now. However, if you expect to upgrade in that time anyway, the iMac is a better value.
    Good Luck with your decision. I know you will be happy no matter which machine you choose!

  • Hi! I'm a Windows XP convert... switched to an imac about 4 months ago and am LOVIN' it  As a graphics designer I did use a feature on my Windows machine which I really miss on my mac... beaing able to see a preview of one of the images in a folder on top

    Hi! I'm a Windows XP convert... switched to an imac about 4 months ago and am LOVIN' it As a graphics designer I did use a feature on my Windows machine which I really miss on my mac... beaing able to see a preview of one of the images in a folder on top of the folder icon. In other words, in Windows, you can see the first image that is inside the folder as an icon on the folder itself. Is there a way to do this on the mac? Maybe some software program that will do it? Thanks for you help!

    It would be brilliant if Apple could make picture folders behave like events in iPhoto. You could see a photo on the folder, and also mouse over it to change pictures.
    But no, there's not an application I'm aware of that does this. You can manually make a picture the folder icon, but it's a tedious process.
    Unfortunately this is another example of how dated and worn out the Mac's interface is. The concept of using a file folder as the icon for a directory of images is so 80's. You could use coverflow, but that only helps once you're in the directory itself. Or use iPhoto or Aperture, although they just do photos. Or try Lyn as an alternative: it has a sort of iTunes-like interface, and makes it easy to organize photos without having to put them in iPhoto. And it can display photos that are already in Libraries.
    But you'd probably need a Finder alternative. I use Leap, which displays any type of document. It also does tagging, which is another huge omission in the Finder. More like Windows Explorer (although still no photo on folder icons).
    Another very stylish Finder alternative, especially useful for pictures, is FileBrowse. I don't know why it hasn't gotten more attention. It DOES put photo previews on the folders it shows. And allows one-click expansion to show the photo enlarged. It's super fast, and even allow you to group/sort by camera or flash! It really has to be seen to be appreciated. It works in Lion, although it doesn't seem to be have been updated lately. http://www.filebrowse.com/index.html
    Rob

  • Which imac would work best for Graphic Design?

    I am a Graphic Designer, currently using Creative Suite 2 (soon to be upgraded to CS3) and I need a new Mac for home. A Powermac takes up too much space, so I'm thinking about an imac with a 24" monitor and I have a few questions for the experts:)
    Which imac would work best for graphics?
    Is the monitor acurate for Pantone color matching?
    Is the 24"monitor on the imac clear and bright?
    Is Leopard a stable OS?
    I also need an (inexpensive) color laser printer. Any suggestions?
    Thanks a bunch!
    Suzi (Machead since the beginning of Mac history)

    Hello and Welcome to Apple Discussions. 
    The 24" iMac uses a superior LCD panel to the 20" model and so is certainly better suited to your purposes. I don't know how badly having a piece of glass in front of the display would affect you as a designer though.
    The display certainly is clear and bright. I use it on it's lowest brightness setting.
    Leopard is stable but it's worth checking that drivers for any devices that you currently rely on are available. For example I have to go back to my 10.4.11 iMac G4 to use my scanner. Personally I can't get iCal to alarm in Leopard but that's a fairly minor gripe.
    As this is the forum for much older iMacs I'd suggest re-posting in the Intel iMac forum and even Mac OS 10.5 Printing forums for better informed opinion:
    <hr width="200">
    G4 (aka Flat Panel): Intel:
    Click image to go to correct forum.
    cheers
    mrtotes

  • Design Choices and is LiveCycle needed? best practices for using RTMP/AMF over HTTP/XML communicatio

    Hi,
    I am new to flex/RIA. I am exploring different design choices especially in client server communication. On client side we will be using Flash based RIA (using Actions scripts).
    There will be some simple forms (like for login, registration, payments etc) and some simple reports including with several graphs and charts. Each chart might have 1000 to 1500 data points etc. There are not video or audio content as such. On server side we have Servlets, java API and some EJBs to provide the business logic and real time prices/content (price update is usually every 10 seconds) /data. Some of the content will be static as well.
    I have following questions in my mind. Is it worth it to use RTMP/AMF channels for the followings?
    1. For simple forms processing (Mapping Actions scripts classes to Java classes). Like to display/retrieve/update data for/from registration forms.
    a. If yes, why? Am I going to be stuck with LCDS? Is it worth it? What could be the cons for heavy usage/traffic scenarios
    b. If not what are the alternates? Should I create the web services? Or only servlets are sufficient (ie. Only HTTP+Java based server side with no LCDS+RTMP+AMF)? All forms need to communicate on secure channel.
    2. For pushing the real time prices/content which we may need to update every 15 seconds on user interface using graphs and charts. Can I do it with some standard J2EE/JMS way with RIA (Flex) on front-end? i.e. Flash application will keep pulling data from some topic. Data can be updated after few secs or few minutes which cant be predicted.
    3. Are there any scalability issues for using RTMP? What happens if concurrent users increase 10 times within a year?
    4. What are the real advantages of using RTMP/AMF instead of simple HTTP/HTTPS probably using xml based objects
    5. Do I need to use LCDS if I am using AMF only on client side? Basically I mean if I am sending an object in form of xml from a servlet. Can some technology in Flash (probably AMF) in client side map it an Action script object?
    6. What are the primary advantages of using LCDS in a system? Is there any alternate solutions? Can I use some standard solutions for data push technologies?
    I would like that my server side implementation can be used by multiple types of clients e.g. RIA browser based, mobile based, third party software (any technology) etc.
    I appreciate if you can kindly refer me to some reading materials which can help me deciding the above. If this is not the right place to post this message then please do refer me to the place where I can post such questions.
    Thanks and Kind regards,
    Jalal

    Hi Jalal,
    Let me see if I can help with some of your questions
    1. Yes, you can use LCDS for simple forms processing. Any time you want to
    move data between the Flex client and the server, LCDS (or its free Open
    source cousin BlazeDS) is going to help. I would expect you would use the
    mx:RemoteObject MXML tag to invoke server side code, passing it the form
    data input by the application user.
    2. If you need to push near real-time data, LCDS gives you the RTMP channel
    which can scale quite nicely. You can then use the mx:Consumer MXML tag to
    subscribe the clients to the messages, which can come from almost anywhere,
    include JMS topics or queues.
    3. RTMP (included in LCDS) is the best option for scaling to tens of
    thousands of users and the LCDS servers can be clustered to proved better
    scaling.
    4. The AMF3 protocol used over the RTMP channels performs much faster than
    simple XML over HTTP. See this blog posting for some tests:
    http://www.jamesward.org/census/.
    5. If you are sending a Flex application XML, then I would recommend using
    the E4X API to work with the XML. This is a pretty nice and powerful way to
    work with XML. If you want Actionscript objects (and probably better
    performance), then using AMF serialization to Actionscript objects is the
    way to go.
    6. Primary advantages? There are many, but mainly you can avoid thinking
    about the plumbing and concentrate on solving your application and business
    logic problems.
    Hope this helps you a little
    Tom Jordahl
    Adobe

Maybe you are looking for