Greater than 90 Days

Hi ,
   I have a characteristic ZMANUDATE.
   Basically, I need to provide a query whereby only materials which have been manufactured greater than 90 days ago
   Please advice

Cheers Arun,
     My concern is if I was to offset by -90 , would this result
     1) show me all the machines which were produced at exactly 90 days ago
     2) show me all the machines which were produced from CURRENT DATE to 90 days ago.
      Option (2) is my requirement.
      Please advice if your proposition will still hold.

Similar Messages

Aprroval for Invoice have due date greater than 100 days

Hi all!
I would like to create query to approve for Invoice have due date greater than 100 days.
SELECT 'true' from OINV where max(datediff(day, OINV.docduedate, getdate()))>100 and OINV.docstatus ='O' and cardcode = $[$4.0.0] group by cardcode
It's not working. Can you help me!
Thanks!

Hi Tien,
Hopefully not trying to teach you how to suck eggs here, but it looks like the query is doing too much. There shouldn't be a need to perform a "GROUP BY" in a query to dictate if an approval is to be triggered or not, only the criterai to make it happen.
For examle, the following code will send a transaction for approval if the customers code equals a specific reference.....
SELECT 'TRUE' FROM ORDR T0 WHERE ${ORDR.CardCode} = 'ABC001'
If you're wanting a query to just return a boolean answer based on the date criteria, you might want to try adapting your query to something like.......
SELECT 'true' from OINV where max(datediff(day, ${OINV.docduedate}, getdate()))>100 and ${OINV.docstatus} ='O' and cardcode = ${$4.0.0}
(As an additional tip, in order to test a query that you're wanting to use as either a formatted search or approval type selection, when in the transaction, if you locate the relevant saved query under "Tools > Queries > User Queries" etc, where you have references to specific fields e.g. ${ORDR.CardCode}, this will pick up the values from the current record and give you a what if scenario. I tend to have just a "Temp" query I use for WIP type queries of this nature.)
Note - You need to replace the bracket's "{}" with square ones, I've used the others as the forum posts as a http reference.
Hope this helps!
Julian

Report data showing a date 1 day greater than selection formula end date

Hi All,
   I have a report that contains the following selection:
date(dateadd("h",-{Calendar.EstUTCOffset}, {tbl.TimeStamp})) >= date(minimum({?Date})) and date(dateadd("h",-{Calendar.EstUTCOffset}, {tbl.TimeStamp})) <= date(maximum({?Date})) and dayofweek(dateadd("h",-{Calendar.EstUTCOffset}, {tbl.TimeStamp})) in {?DayOfWeek} and
    time(dateadd("h",-{Calendar.EstUTCOffset}, {tbl.TimeStamp})) >= time({?Start Time}) and
    time(dateadd("h",-{Calendar.EstUTCOffset}, {tbl.TimeStamp})) < time({?End Time})
When I view the report, if my date(maximum({?Date})) is 5/1/2011, the report shows data for 5/2/2011. I can't seem to figure out why my report is generating data for a date that is 1 day greater than my end date.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thank you in advance,

No need to send SQL as dates are not in WHERE clause.
It someting to do with the way crystal handles datetimes
If you want to see dates up to an including 6/2/2011 if its a date time crystal will create a where caluse
Datetimefield <= 6/3/2011 00:00:00
Looks like when this is converted to date its stayin as 6/3/2011
Sorry can't think of any solutions, also I live in UK so just about to leave, hopefully some one else may be able to offer a solution.
Ian

Need to create a workflow after Date Modified is greater than 7 days

I'm using SharePoint Deisnger 2010 and attempting to create a workflow to generate an email after the Date Modified is greater than 7 days. Checking to see if there is a way to create this workflow without creating a "calculated" field with a date.
Have:
If Current Item:Modified is greater than Today
But would like to have 7 days not today or a set date.
What's the best way to do this?

Hello,
In addition to Bistech, here is link to set date in WF context variable.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17082455/sharepoint-designer-2010-set-variable-today-x-days
Hemendra:Yesterday is just a memory,Tomorrow we may never see
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help

Unit Testing - Results greater than 0

I am unit testing a PL/SQL function. The function has no inputs and one output (Interval Day to Second) . The output is the time it takes to run a query therefore a valid value for the output would be greater than 0.
When I setup the test the result only takes a Interval Day to Second value. I want to be able to say any result greater than 0 is a success.
How can I do this?
tom

I am unit testing a PL/SQL function. The function has no inputs and one output (Interval Day to Second) . The output is the time it takes to run a query therefore a valid value for the output would be greater than 0.
When I setup the test the result only takes a Interval Day to Second value. I want to be able to say any result greater than 0 is a success.
How can I do this?
tom

Greater Than &gt in Hana?

Context:
I have a Ms Sql Statement inside a xml file and I have a conditional with a "Greater Than" comparison, so because this within a XML File I can't use the regular syntax for "Greater Than" ( > ) then I use the (>)
Ms Sql Server Statement
<Query ID="some_query">
if ( DATEDIFF(day,@fechaVencimiento, getdate() ) > 0 OR @Consecutivo_Inicial > @Consecutivo)
       begin
          set @Consecutivo= @Consecutivo_Inicial
          set @seReinicio = 2
       end
</Query>
Question:
What would be the equivalent syntax for ( > ) in Hana?
Thanks in advance.
Message was edited by: Tom Flanagan

Hi there,
Was '>' or '<' not working from XML? I used a > operator in a calculated column and then exported the HANA model to see the XML file of it. It has something like this below:
<formula>IF("EMP NO " >=3,"EMPLOYEE NAME","GENDER")</formula>
Regards,
Krishna Tangudu

Greater than or equal to

Hi everyone. I have what I think is a simple query (see
below) that pulls date information from a table. As you can see
from the query, I want it to pull dates for anything greater than
and equal to today's date and anything less than and equal to a
date one week from today's date.
This works, however, CF does not output any events on today's
date; it begins outputting tomorrow's events. Can someone point me
in the right direction as how to fix this so dates for today are
output as well? Thanks!

For the "up through day" portion, I truncate the time component off of now(), add a day, and then use only the less than comparison. Example:
     <cfset variables.dt1 = dateAdd("d",1,int(now())) />
     <cfset variables.dt2 = dateAdd("d",-8,variables.dt1) />
     <p>dt1 = #variables.dt1# / dt2 = #variables.dt2#</p>
This results into:
     dt1 = {ts '2013-09-28 00:00:00'} / dt2 = {ts '2013-09-20 00:00:00'}
Lastly, use the results in your query comparison:
     where
          [someDateField] < <cfqueryparam value="#variables.dt1#" cfsqltype="CF_SQL_DATE" />
          and [someDateField] >= <cfqueryparam value="#variables.dt2#" cfsqltype="CF_SQL_DATE" />
Also, the cfsqltype of CF_SQL_DATE seems to truncate the time component off the date for you in CF9 & CF10, but I don't like dependencies like that as I've been burned in the past. If you don't mind the risk, you can simplify the logic by removing the int() function from the above.

Greater than or equal to problem.

Hey All,
I'm building a script for Final Cut Pro (7) this is a small part of the entire script and I am having some difficulties getting this to work. So, the objective is to get a number from the user, then to have the number escalate as it repeats. I also need to make this number "Paste" in. However I cannot use the cliboard functions at all because they will be in use in a different part of the script.
What this part was designed to do, (but doesn't do all the time ) is take the number submitted by the user, and break it down by digit and spit it back out in the form of a variable key code. Another part of the script would do the escalation of the number. But what I really need is to find out why the greater than or equal to/ less than or equal to are correctly segmentig the numbers, so the script doesn't try to do the input number more than once.
set start_value to text returned of (display dialog "Start number?: " default answer "") as number
if start_value is greater than or equal to 0 then
    if start_value is less than or equal to 9 then
        set start_value to start_value as string
        set start_value01 to 0
        set start_value02 to 0
        set start_value03 to the first item of start_value as number
    end if
end if
if start_value is greater than or equal to 10 then
    if start_value is less than or equal to 99 then
        set start_value to start_value as string
        set start_value01 to 0
        set start_value02 to the first item of start_value as number
        set start_value03 to the second item of start_value as number
    end if
end if
if start_value is greater than or equal to 100 then
    if start_value is less than or equal to 999 then
        set start_value to start_value as string
        set start_value01 to the first item of start_value as number
        set start_value02 to the second item of start_value as number
        set start_value03 to the third item of start_value as number
    end if
end if
if start_value01 is 1 then set O1 to 18
if start_value01 is 2 then set O1 to 19
if start_value01 is 3 then set O1 to 20
if start_value01 is 4 then set O1 to 21
if start_value01 is 5 then set O1 to 23
if start_value01 is 6 then set O1 to 22
if start_value01 is 7 then set O1 to 26
if start_value01 is 8 then set O1 to 28
if start_value01 is 9 then set O1 to 25
if start_value01 is 0 then set O1 to 29
if start_value02 is 1 then set O2 to 18
if start_value02 is 2 then set O2 to 19
if start_value02 is 3 then set O2 to 20
if start_value02 is 4 then set O2 to 21
if start_value02 is 5 then set O2 to 23
if start_value02 is 6 then set O2 to 22
if start_value02 is 7 then set O2 to 26
if start_value02 is 8 then set O2 to 28
if start_value02 is 9 then set O2 to 25
if start_value02 is 0 then set O2 to 29
if start_value03 is 1 then set O3 to 18
if start_value03 is 2 then set O3 to 19
if start_value03 is 3 then set O3 to 20
if start_value03 is 4 then set O3 to 21
if start_value03 is 5 then set O3 to 23
if start_value03 is 6 then set O3 to 22
if start_value03 is 7 then set O3 to 26
if start_value03 is 8 then set O3 to 28
if start_value03 is 9 then set O3 to 25
if start_value03 is 0 then set O3 to 29
tell application "TextEdit"
    activate
    tell application "System Events"
        tell process "TextEdit"
            key code O1
            delay 0.1
            key code O2
            delay 0.1
            key code O3
        end tell
    end tell
end tell
Text Edit being my test dummy for this part of the operation. I am on 10.8, a couple others will be on 10.7.
Thanks for any help on this!
Gabe

The answer is clear when you step through the code.
It starts off OK...
set start_value to text returned of (display dialog "Start number?: " default answer "") as number
Let's use the hypothetical value of 44 as the input.
Your code progresses to the block:
if start_value is greater than or equal to 10 then
which evaluates to true (44 is greater than 10), so we proceed:
          if start_value is less than or equal to 99 then
It is less than 99, so we're still good here...
                    set start_value to start_value as string
Well, now you've coerced start_value back to a string object "44", it is no longer a number. That's OK for the purposes of this block, however, when you continue:
if start_value is greater than or equal to 100 then
here's where the problem reveals itself - you're now comparing start_value (the string value "44") against the number 100. Comparing strings to numbers is inherently dangerous - as you're seeing. The string value "44" is, indeed greater (in AppleScript's terms) than the number 100 (technically, the second operand (number 100) gets coerced to the type of the first operand (string "44") before the comparison is performed, so you're really comparing the strings "44" and "100" and a string that starts with '4' will always be greater than a string that starts with '1')
The simplest solution is to not change the start_value variable mid-stream. So instead of:
                    set start_value to start_value as string
                    set start_value01 to 0
                    set start_value02 to the first item of start_value as number
                    set start_value03 to the second item of start_value as number
do something like:
                    set start_value_string to start_value as string
                    set start_value01 to 0
                    set start_value02 to the first item of start_value_string as number
                    set start_value03 to the second item of start_value_string as number
In this way you're making a text copy of your start_value, so the type doesn't change as your script progresses.
There are other ways of solving this, of course - changing the type back, or reversing the operands in your greater than statements (so the string "44" gets silently coerced back to a number), but at the end of the day I recommend not changing the class/type of your variables.

Greater Than Less Than

Dear all,
I am Using oracle 10g R2 database on windows.
I have a doubt that,
If I have a 'Date' datatype column suppose a and want to (select Less than sysdate and greater than Sysdate-31(One Month).
e.i.
select a,b,c from T where a Less Than Sysdate-31(One month.);How can i do this.
Thanks,
Chanchal Wankhade.

Shinegar wrote:
I had not considered the effect on an index with TRUNC. Thank you for pointing that out.
TRUNC doesn't actually remove time as you can see below
SELECT TO_CHAR(TRUNC(SYSDATE),'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MM:SS AM') "Today's Date and Time" from DUAL;
Today's Date and Time
01/19/2012 12:01:00 AMLet's say sysdate = Jan 19, 2012 11:00:00 AM
As shown above, trunc(sysdate) = Jan 19, 2012 12:01:00 AM
So, trunc(sysdate) -1 = Jan 18, 2012 12:01:00 AM
Removing the trunc from column a
select a,b,c
from T
where a between trunc(sysdate)-1 and trunc(sysdate);will also remove all data that is greater than Jan 19, 2012, 12:01:00 AM so you would only see data from one day -- Jan 18th.
Adding the trunc to column a returns all the data from Jan 18th and 19th.
It is my experience that users will ask for a date range, but then will ask for just one day. If Column a is not truncated, then no rows would be returned when between trunc(sysdate) and trunc(sysdate).
Most programmers will not use trunc(sysdate) in the where clause, but would use a variable with value assigned of sysdate or trunc(sysdate) as it provides more flexibility.
If you do not want to use trunc on column a, then the where clause should be BETWEEN trunc(sysdate) - 31 AND sysdate.
Edited by: Shinegar on Jan 19, 2012 12:40 PMThe trunc function does not remove the time portion, but it does set it to midnight. Or at least i would if you used the correct format mask in your TO_CHAR. The mask for minutes is MI not MM.
SQL> SELECT TO_CHAR(TRUNC(SYSDATE),'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM') am_pm,
2 TO_CHAR(TRUNC(SYSDATE),'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS') mil_time
3 from dual;
AM_PM MIL_TIME
01/19/2012 12:00:00 AM 01/19/2012 00:00:00John

Planning for Sales orders for quantities greater than forecast in APO SNP

Hi All,
We have a requirement in which planning in SNP is done based on the forecast quantity transferred from DP . Demand from Sales orders is not taken into consideration for planning . The PO's are created based on the forecast quantity only SO's consume forecast . Now a situation arises where we have the sales orders quantity ( say 400) is more than that of the forecast( say 300 ) , this means for quantity of 100 no planning is being done by SNP.
We want to know are there any ways of getting the remaining quantity being planned by SNP
The planning strategy used is 40 in ECC
Thanks in advance
Regards
Surendra

Hi Surendra,
For better control, the forecast quantity should match the sales order quantity for plg strategy 40. If there are cases when sales order quantity is greater than forecast, you can create a control check in ECC to inform the users who creates the sales orders to get a popup message to create a sales order with rush order type or any other type to track the excess sales orders received against forecast.
In SNP, once this rush order is entered, upon subsequent net change heuristic plan which runs day night, it considers those excess quantities and puts up purchase requisitions and procurement & production can be planned based using those PRs in SNP.
Please confirm
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

V$UNDOSTAT BEGIN)TIME GREATER THAN SYSDATE

I have 18 rows in V$UNDOSTAT with begin_time greater than sysdate.
what could have caused that?
I noticed this anomaly when i was looking for some undo information.
All that has happened recently is, I have restored the db (9.2.0.1 on REHL 3)
on a different server as the original server had a bad disk (RAID5 rebuild was taking too long). So i shutdown the db and copied all files from the last cold backup to the new server(same config)and restored all the archlogs. Everything has been going fine since than.
Would a db bounce reset the date anoamly??
Any ideas !!!
Thankyou

Hello,
Yes you are right, the MAXQUERYLEN of the query *60mwzy51cs6sx* is very high (213380 seconde = 2,5 day) :
07-21-2010 16:48:2010 213380 60mwzy51cs6sx
07-21-2010 20:07:2010 225213 60mwzy51cs6sxAnd more over, it seems that the same query repeat several time and the MAXQUERYLEN is higher and higher.
You may get the offending query as follow:
Select sql_text from v$sqltext where sql_id = '60mwzy51cs6sx' /* MAXQUERYID value */It seems that the MAXQUERYLEN is never resetted for this query.
If you are sure that this query is not still running for almost 3 days so, I don't know why there's this kind of behaviour and, if I were you, I'll ask to the support.
Best regards,
Jean-Valentin

WAP121 Buggy firmware : crash with firmware greater than 1.0.0.3

Hello,
I have more than 10 WAP121 devices and everything was fine before I upgrade a few of them to firmware greater than 1.0.0.3.
After 2-3 days the upgraded devices just crash and doesn't respond to ping. I have to reboot them each time. I'm using POE catalyst to power them.
It would be nice to sort this out or to give us the possibility to download the factory firmware 1.0.0.3 not available on the download section.
Best regards,
Mathieu

Depends on hardware i think.. i dont really know why. i have cases that, using FW 1.0.3.4 AP has been up since 17days without issues, but in this case using 1.0.3.4 too wont last more than 5 hours using it.
I´ve crash logs from an ap using 1.0.2.3:
/mnt/etc/crashdump # cat *
4
Software Version: 1.0.2.3
Crash Log:
Uptime of the AP: 0 Days, 5 Hours, 37 Minutes and 21 Seconds
CPU Unable to handle kernel paging request for process = swapper and pid = 0
epc == c0516fe0, ra == c054b564
Stack Trace:
[<00000000c054b564>] - wlc_scbfree+0xe8/0x3b4 [wl]
[<00000000c054c030>] - wlc_userscb_alloc+0x2c8/0x2d0 [wl]
[<00000000c054c7dc>] - wlc_scblookup+0x11c/0x1c0 [wl]
[<00000000c0579c44>] - wlc_ap_authresp+0x68c/0x9d0 [wl]
[<00000000c053325c>] - wlc_recvctl+0x1158/0x28b8 [wl]
[<00000000c0674644>] - wlc_recv+0x5f8/0x808 [wl]
[<00000000c067d358>] - wlc_dpc+0x6c8/0xb30 [wl]
[<00000000c0677020>] - wl_dpc+0x50/0x164 [wl]
[<000000008002effc>] - tasklet_action+0x70/0xf4
[<000000008002e980>] - __do_softirq+0x80/0x110
[<000000008002ea78>] - do_softirq+0x68/0x70
Software Version: 1.0.2.3
Crash Log:
Uptime of the AP: 0 Days, 5 Hours, 39 Minutes and 35 Seconds
CPU Unable to handle kernel paging request for process = swapper and pid = 0
epc == c0516fe0, ra == c054b564
Stack Trace:
[<00000000c054b564>] - wlc_scbfree+0xe8/0x3b4 [wl]
[<00000000c054c030>] - wlc_userscb_alloc+0x2c8/0x2d0 [wl]
[<00000000c054c7dc>] - wlc_scblookup+0x11c/0x1c0 [wl]
[<00000000c0579c44>] - wlc_ap_authresp+0x68c/0x9d0 [wl]
[<00000000c053325c>] - wlc_recvctl+0x1158/0x28b8 [wl]
[<00000000c0674644>] - wlc_recv+0x5f8/0x808 [wl]
[<00000000c067d358>] - wlc_dpc+0x6c8/0xb30 [wl]
[<00000000c0677020>] - wl_dpc+0x50/0x164 [wl]
[<000000008002effc>] - tasklet_action+0x70/0xf4
[<000000008002e980>] - __do_softirq+0x80/0x110
[<000000008002ea78>] - do_softirq+0x68/0x70
Software Version: 1.0.2.3
Crash Log:
Uptime of the AP: 0 Days, 5 Hours, 43 Minutes and 17 Seconds
CPU Unable to handle kernel paging request for process = swapper and pid = 0
epc == 80076930, ra == c0517000
Stack Trace:
[<00000000c0517000>] - wlc_txc_scb_free+0x50/0x8c [wl]
[<00000000c0518ffc>] - wlc_txc_scb_init+0xcc/0xd4 [wl]
[<00000000c054a3e4>] - wlc_scbinit+0x98/0xcc [wl]
[<00000000c054be28>] - wlc_userscb_alloc+0xc0/0x2d0 [wl]
[<00000000c054c7dc>] - wlc_scblookup+0x11c/0x1c0 [wl]
[<00000000c0579c44>] - wlc_ap_authresp+0x68c/0x9d0 [wl]
[<00000000c053325c>] - wlc_recvctl+0x1158/0x28b8 [wl]
[<00000000c0674644>] - wlc_recv+0x5f8/0x808 [wl]
[<00000000c067d358>] - wlc_dpc+0x6c8/0xb30 [wl]
[<00000000c0677020>] - wl_dpc+0x50/0x164 [wl]
[<000000008002effc>] - tasklet_action+0x70/0xf4
[<000000008002e980>] - __do_softirq+0x80/0x110
[<000000008002ea78>] - do_softirq+0x68/0x70
Software Version: 1.0.2.3
Crash Log:
Uptime of the AP: 0 Days, 5 Hours, 40 Minutes and 18 Seconds
CPU Unable to handle kernel paging request for process = swapper and pid = 0
epc == 80076930, ra == c0517000
Stack Trace:
[<00000000c0517000>] - wlc_txc_scb_free+0x50/0x8c [wl]
[<00000000c0518ffc>] - wlc_txc_scb_init+0xcc/0xd4 [wl]
[<00000000c054a3e4>] - wlc_scbinit+0x98/0xcc [wl]
[<00000000c054be28>] - wlc_userscb_alloc+0xc0/0x2d0 [wl]
[<00000000c054c7dc>] - wlc_scblookup+0x11c/0x1c0 [wl]
[<00000000c0579c44>] - wlc_ap_authresp+0x68c/0x9d0 [wl]
[<00000000c053325c>] - wlc_recvctl+0x1158/0x28b8 [wl]
[<00000000c0674644>] - wlc_recv+0x5f8/0x808 [wl]
[<00000000c067d358>] - wlc_dpc+0x6c8/0xb30 [wl]
[<00000000c0677020>] - wl_dpc+0x50/0x164 [wl]
[<000000008002effc>] - tasklet_action+0x70/0xf4
[<000000008002e980>] - __do_softirq+0x80/0x110
[<000000008002ea78>] - do_softirq+0x68/0x70
868: /usr/sbin/dman
RC = 0 PC Location = 0x2ac3a40c
RA Location = 0x42da50
SP Location = 0x7fd13b20
Current frame at 0x7FD13B20, size 88 bytes, retaddr offset 80 bytes
PC = 0x42da50
Current frame at 0x7FD13B78, size 232 bytes, retaddr offset 228 bytes
PC = 0x407b04
Current frame at 0x7FD13C60, size 440 bytes, retaddr offset 436 bytes
PC = 0x2ac6e328
Current frame at 0x7FD13E18, size 184 bytes, retaddr offset 176 bytes
PC = 0x4063e4
Current frame at 0x7FD13ED0, size 32 bytes, retaddr offset 60 bytes
That return address doesn't look like userspace code-space. Giving up.
/mnt/etc/crashdump #
as you can see, AP max uptime was 5 hours.
and as a personal opinion i don agree with removing SSH access, and grater versions of FW than 1.0.0.3 wont allow that anymore due to "security concerns".

Time values that add up to greater than 24 hours

Hi Apple SUpport Community,
I am trying to get a cell in Numbers to return a TIME value when the sum of two time values are greater than 24.
For example, if a worker has a shift that starts at 8pm and works for 6 hours and 15 minutes, the shift ends at ((20:00+06:15=26:15)-24:00)=02:15am the next day.
If I formulate a cell in numbers to add to time values, it comes return the nasty red triangle saying "The Formula's arguments can only contain one date value"
Thanks in advance for any help!
ST

a duration can be obtained by subtracting two time values (which are technically the date and the time). durations are specified as:
weeks, days, hours, minutes, seconds and milliseconds.
I do not know what you are trying to figure out...
- how long did the worker work? or
- when did the shift end?
can you state a question (without regard for the solution) so we can assist? Also a screen shot of what you enter and what you want as output would be helpful.
All that said you can subtract two times to get a duration. You can add durations to get another duration. You cannot add times. To specify that an entry is a time you enter in the format "0w 0d 30h 14m 22s 0ms" any of the entries with 0 may be omitted.
you can add durations in cells by using the "+" or "-" operator
as in A1-B1
where A1 contains "3h 45m" and B1 contains "1h 15m"
the result will be "2h 30m"

What can I do to increase battery usage time to greater than 6 hours?

What can I do to increase battery usage time to greater than 6 hours? I have a New iPad purchased 03/23/2012 64K-WiFi. I recharge it and get another 6 hours usage. I am using it primarily for reading books. Are there any applications I can turn off to get back to 10 hours?

@Ralph9430 The changes you recommended were implemented. This afternoon approximately at the same time and with similar usage all day The New iPad had 36% left on battery. This is a gain of 30% battery life. Thank you. Your suggestions resolved the issues.

Key combo for Greater Than or Equal To?

Hi all,
The key combination for the Greater Than or Equal To sign is option+>, and for Less Than or Equal To is option+>. When I use these combos I get ligatures, ffl and ffi respectively. I need the mathematical symbols. How do I make the symbols and not the ligatures appear?
Thanks--feeling kinda dumb these days, with the new CS4 and all...
--d

Never mind. If I use the EXPERT set of my font, I get exactly what I need. DOH!

Greater than 90 Days

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for