Gross weight getting cleared

There is a issue with Material Master loading.for an already created material, if you reload as Alternative UoM same as the Base UoM it is erasing the gross weight.But when we load the same material (Alternative uom is same as of base uom) in another system but plant is different it is not erasing the gross weight.Is there any customizing we have to do to prevent this issue.

Wrong structure, this field is not used for many years. you have to have the gross weight in E1MARMM
If you create a material manually, then the gross weight from basic data view is just copied over into the alternative unit screen to the base unit., which is table MARM.
With the IDOC you have to do it the other way around. you need to provide the weight in the E1MARMM structure and the weight will appear in MARA and your basic data view too.
If you made the field in basic data view mandatory, then you should load the gross weight in both structures.

Similar Messages

Wrong Gross Weight for Material in Sales Order at Item Level (Shipping Tab)

Dear All,
Except MMR, where we maintain gross weight for material?
Or, from where Gross weight gets detrmined in Sales Order at item level (Shipping Tab)?
Details,
I've 2 Materials in Sales Order, Mat1 and Mat2.
In both the MMRs, Gross weight is 1.080 Kg
In sales Order Mat1 has Qty 18,000 Kg and gross weight is 19,440 Kg --> which is right.
Mat2 has Qty 2,160 Kg and gross weight is 2,332,800 Kg --> which is wrong.
I tried with maintaing another line item with Mat2 in Sales Order, for which again wrong gross weight is calculated.
I also tried with creating another Sales Order with Mat2, and again the same problem.
Thanks for your help, in advance.
Regds,
Yogi.

Hi,
Thanks. That has already been checked by me, in Basic data1 --> Additional Data --> Unit of measurements
everything is maintained correctly.
What I have noticed is:
Instead of obtaining Gross weight as 1.080 (which is maintained), somehow system is picking 1,080 (don't know why and from where)?
Regds,
yogi

Gross weight and net weight not getting copied from Inquiry to quotation

Hai Gurus
Could anyone tell me why gross weight & net weight for the particular quantity of goods are not getting copied to quotation and order from an inquiry. All other details that I maintain in an inquiry (shipping type, receiving point etc) are getting copied to quotation.
regards
John
Edited by: Gino12 on Nov 11, 2010 12:49 PM

Dear
Did you maintain in MM02-MMR-Sales/Plant view Gross weight and Net wirght ??
System calculates the net weight based on the order quantity for the item and the net weight proposed from the material master record. If the item has more than one schedule line, the system uses the total order quantity of all schedule lines to calculate the net weight. In sales documents where schedule lines are not allowed (contracts, for example), the system calculates the net weight using the target quantity.
Regards
JH

How to get the gross weight of the material after packing in delivery ?

Hello,
We need to print the gross weight of the material after packing which includes packing material weight and target quantity weight for each material in the delivery.
From which table the gross weight of the material after packing can be retrieved.
Regards,
Mohan

Hi Mohan,
You can go through the thread it may help you.
Pls help me in Packing
Regards,
V Srinivasan

Badi for updating Item Gross Weight (VL01N)

Hi All
I am using interface CHANGE_DELIVERY_ITEM and
FILL_DELIVERY_ITEM of defination name LE_SHP_DELIVERY_PROC to change the gross weight of delivery item. System is allowing me to change the gross weight in interface CHANGE_DELIVERY_ITEM but is not getting saved in the database.
Please Advice.
Ravindra Suvarna

Hi!
I have not seen any hint, that this is not possible. But this is difficult to say without own test data, so you have to make some more checks.
Just place a break-point in your coding and debug a little bit starting with your new gross weight. Look, where it is overwritten again. Maybe it's very soon / easy to find. Think about watch points, too (but there can be a lot of different tables involved).
Regards,
Christian

BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA Gross weight BRGEW

Hello,
searched the forum and found older entries regarding transfer of the gross weight with BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA.
But all adivises I read do not help.
I am aware how to use the BAPI and the tables.
So here the facts:
Base unit of measure and net weight are passed with CLIENTDATA and corresponding CLIENTDATAX.
As gross weight BRGEW is required field the error message appears.
Logical until now.
Now there is the table UNITSOFMEASURE and UNITSOFMEASUREX.
They are for alternative unit of measures.
Some posted to use that to fill gross weight.
Ok. I fill the tables:   lw_MARM = UNITSOFMEASURE
    MOVE p_lw_data-meins TO lw_marm-alt_unit.
    MOVE p_lw_data-ntgew TO lw_marm-gross_wt.
    MOVE p_lw_data-gewei TO lw_marm-unit_of_wt.
    APPEND lw_marm TO p_lt_marm.
    MOVE p_lw_data-meins TO lw_marmx-alt_unit.
    MOVE c_charx TO lw_marmx-gross_wt.
    MOVE c_charx TO lw_marmx-unit_of_wt.
    APPEND lw_marmx TO p_lt_marmx.
==> Now the message M3332 appears.
The alternative unit of measure is the same as the base unit of measure
And yes it is of course the same. I do not want to enter an alternative one.
Could the ISO code help?
But it should not be the key really.
I would be glad to get some answers on this.
BR

Hello,
searched the forum and found older entries regarding transfer of the gross weight with BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA.
But all adivises I read do not help.
I am aware how to use the BAPI and the tables.
So here the facts:
Base unit of measure and net weight are passed with CLIENTDATA and corresponding CLIENTDATAX.
As gross weight BRGEW is required field the error message appears.
Logical until now.
Now there is the table UNITSOFMEASURE and UNITSOFMEASUREX.
They are for alternative unit of measures.
Some posted to use that to fill gross weight.
Ok. I fill the tables:   lw_MARM = UNITSOFMEASURE
    MOVE p_lw_data-meins TO lw_marm-alt_unit.
    MOVE p_lw_data-ntgew TO lw_marm-gross_wt.
    MOVE p_lw_data-gewei TO lw_marm-unit_of_wt.
    APPEND lw_marm TO p_lt_marm.
    MOVE p_lw_data-meins TO lw_marmx-alt_unit.
    MOVE c_charx TO lw_marmx-gross_wt.
    MOVE c_charx TO lw_marmx-unit_of_wt.
    APPEND lw_marmx TO p_lt_marmx.
==> Now the message M3332 appears.
The alternative unit of measure is the same as the base unit of measure
And yes it is of course the same. I do not want to enter an alternative one.
Could the ISO code help?
But it should not be the key really.
I would be glad to get some answers on this.
BR

Overwriting the Gross-Weight (E1VPDLI-BRGEW) from inbound idoc sdpiid01

Hi All,
We are creating document to update confirmation quatities in SAP with inbound idoc SDPICK.SDPIID01 from 3rd party system using XI. We have the correct Gross-Weight(E1VPDLI-BRGEW) in the Idoc, but while posting into SAP, the value getting over-write with I guess net weight. Does anybody know how to stop this Gross wt thing to overwtrie?? Any userexit that I could use for the same???
Regards
Navin

.

Open Item not getting Cleared automatically

Dear Sir,
For a GL "Cenvat Clearing" , we have ticked the option "open Item Management" in FS00 .
Our business scenario is as below :
After MIGO , we do excise posting using J1IEX and here in the posted Fi document the GL "Cenvat Clearing" gets Credited . Subsequently during the MIRO this GL i.e "Cenvat Claering" gets Debited .
My problem is that when I see in FBL3n for this GL the relevant transaction still appear under the open Items . Pl guide me , as what is the reason for this entry not getting cleared automatically .
Regards
B Mittal
Regar

PO number cannot be taken as sort feild hence the value is in blank always.
You need to identify some value for this feild and as a process you need to tell your users to incorporate the same at the time of doing MIRO.
Or other wise you can take out the assignment of sort key to this GL account, and as a process you can instruct your user to use reference feild and input a value. If you fell that this is a tedious process,
the Identify another feild that is common for both debit and credit line items and try to post with a common valuie using, one ABAP program which will update this feild. Mind that this feild need to be in the OB74.
reward if useful
sarma

GR/IR Clearing a/c not getting cleared..

Dear All,
My GR/IR clearing account is not getting cleared automatically after Invoice posting..is it the standard behavior or anything
missing?
For example- GR/IR Clearing a/c is 13110100,when GRN is done it is getting credited and once invoice is posted it gets
debited so it should show cleared when we run FS10N / FBL3N
please let me know whether it is needed to clear manually?
Naren

Hi
F.13 is for executing the setting configured under Financial Accounting -> General Ledger Account -> Business Transactions ->Open item clearing - > Prepare Automatic clearing. In this place, the GL account needs to be updated with the relevant criteria like, what are the fields to be matched for clearing like Reference field, assignment, etc.
After that, if F.13 is executed for this GL account then it will clear based on the criteria specified above.
Hope it clarifies
Regards
Lakshmanan Krishnan

How to get CLEAR photos on the Touch?

I love my iPod touch, but there's one thing that has always bothered my - photos sync'd through iPhoto-->iTunes are grainy and have bad color. Until now, I've been unable to prove this - but finally I've found a way to prove that it's not just in my head. So, I'm wondering if anyone knows a way to get clear photos on the Touch ... ?
First of all, after using the app "PhoneView" to download my sync'd pictures from my iPod BACK to my Mac, I've noticed that the resolutions are different for pictures, depending on whether their orientation is portrait or landscape. For portrait 4x6 images, the resolution is indeed 480x320. However, for landscape orientation, the resolution is consistently 640x426. I think it's kind of odd that iTunes would be sizing photos differently depending on their orientation ... I usually have my full-resolution pictures in iPhoto and sync those images through iTunes, but today I also tried manually resizing my pictures to 640x426 (landscape) and 480x320 (portrait) and then syncing them as a folder, rather than through iPhoto. The results were the same as doing it through iPhoto: disappointing. I've put together a sample, below:
!http://www.mavisxp.com/ipod/iTunes_compression.png!
and another example here.
As you can see, even the manually resized images are turning out horribly grainy. What's even more disappointing than the image quality, however, is the file size: my original JPG is 84KB, but the iTunes' "optimized" JPG is five times as large (456KB) with inaccurate color and awful grain to boot. I mean, it looks like someone dribbled a basketball all over a glossy print (seriously, that grain's pattern is an exact match with the grain on a basketball) ... Is it supposed to look like that?
+After examining the EXIF data for both pictures, I've noticed another oddity which explains the bad color at least - when iTunes 'optimizes' pictures for the iPod, it apparently assigns them your monitor's color profile! Was this just an oversight that has yet to be corrected? When I export my pictures from Lightroom to iPhoto, I always use the sRGB profile because it's the most standard profile to use when sharing pictures (posting online, emailing, etc) ... My iMac's color profile is a custom Spyder2Pro profile, but that profile is only accurate for THIS MONITOR - certainly not my iPod! Anyway, I've uploaded the original pictures if anyone is interested in checking them out - you can download them in a zip archive here.+
This is the second iPod I've noticed grainy pictures with, so I know it's not just defective hardware. So I guess my question is simple: does anyone know of ANY way to get clear photos sync'd with the iPod Touch or iPhone? I've poked through plists in iTunes.app and preferences, etc - but I haven't found anything. Any ideas?

Thanks for the reply, Duddo.
I guess you're right, Apple probably just wanted to simplify the syncing process and make it consistent for all users. And no, most users probably won't notice that awful grain and poor color reproduction.
That said, I think it's a real shame to waste the capabilities of the iPhone/Touch like this. Wasting storage space is asinine (increasing file size 5X when 'optimizing'?!) not only due to the limited storage space available in the first place, but also due to the fact that smaller files are quicker and easier to load and manipulate. Overwriting color profiles is just sloppy coding, an oversight - hopefully one they'll soon fix. But the biggest problem for me is that the pinch/zoom functionality is USELESS because if you zoom in at all, the grain is so blatantly obvious. I found an old discussion thread on another forum which mentions this problem, according to several posters there, the grain problem was introduced AFTER the iPhone launched (meaning it can likely be corrected in a firmware update or an iTunes update) ... You can check out that discussion here, if you're interested:
http://www.everythingicafe.com/forum/iphone/not-optimize-photos-8264.html
Anyway thanks again for your reply. I'll keep my eye on this thread and if I hear anything about this issue (or a workaround) I'll be sure to post it!

SSRS Parameters using SSAS Tabular model get cleared

I have an SSRS report that uses data from a SSAS Tabular model. In the query designer, from the calendar dimension I choose a "Date Inclusive" filter and make it a parameter. I also choose to add another filter using and Organisation Unit
dimension and also make this a parameter. The report is written and deployed to a SharePoint 2013 library.
Most of the time, the report runs as expected with the parameters cascading off each other as expected. However, occasionally, parameters get cleared (either after changing a single value such as the Org Unit selection or sometime whilst the report
is being rendered). Sometimes you cannot select a value from the available values - you need to navigate somewhere else and then start over.
I changed the data source for the parameters to use SQL queries that return the same values as the MDX queries and the probably seems to have gone (time will tell)
This report has a child (detail) report that has one extract parameter. This parameter happens to have over 1,000 values. With the change of the parent report, you are now able to get to the child report. However, the child report seems
to exhibit the same problem with the parameters being cleared - and with a much higher frequency.
So, that leaves me wondering whether
anyone else has experienced this ?
is this an issue with SSRS 2012 and SSAS Tabular models (I have not seen this behaviour before and I have been using SSRS (since version 1) and SSAS Multi-dimensional (from when it was called "OLAP Services") ?

We applied SQL Server 2012 Service Pack 2 to the SharePoint farm (the SP Admin needed to re-create the service applications) and the problem is fixed

Assignment Field Get Cleared(blank) During Automatic Payment Run(F110)

Hi all,
We have a senario that during the creation of AP invoice, the Profit Center is entered in Assignment field ( BSEG-ZUONR) in FB01.In the invoice document the assignment field value correctly copied into Profit center (BSEG-PRCTR) based on a subsititution rule.
But during the payment document run (F110) the assignment field is get cleared (Blank).and in REGUP table, the Assignment field get populated correctly.
By displaying the payment document using transaction code FB03, the assingment fields is empty.ie field BSEG-ZUONR is empty. .
We have checked all the subsititution rules defined in the system and none of these causing the problem. We suspect there are some hidden subsititution or configurations in SAP that affect the assignment. We also checked the sort key is not the cause of it.
Have anyone encounter the same scenario why the Assignment field get cleared(blank) in Payment document. Please kindly share.
Regards
Riaz

Hi,
I think you are trying to Run Automatic Payment Programme with Check Management and you want to Print check and payment summary.
Kindly check if you have defined SAP Scripts in FBZP Payment Method in Company Code.Select a Co Code and double click on payment method eg C-Cheque, their is a section called FORM DATA you need to input Scripts for the same so that the Payment Programme prints output as defined in the SAP Script for Checks and payment advice
Regards
Rahul

Gross Weight Unit of Measure (MARA-GEWEI) SAP ECC 6.0

Hi There,
We use something called IPC for sales over the Internet. IPC is showing the customers our materials from the material master in KG and we need to show them in LB. The reason this is happening is because the materials are created in Europe and there is an automatic creation of the material to our system in the US. We would like to know if there is something we can do in our system to convert the Gross Weight Unit from KG to LB in an automatic way using some kind of conversion rule? What does T006 has to do with this if there is any relationship?
Thanks for your help.
Luis.

KG and LB belong both to dimesion MASS
KG is the SI unit.
in any unit belonging to dimension MASS you can enter a fix conversion rate to the SI unit KG.
this conversion will then automatically pulled if you enter the LB as alternative unit in your materials.
Further you can call a function module UNIT_CONVERSION_SIMPLE to convert from one unit to the other

JSF page values are getting cleared with validation errors

Using Jdev 10.1.3.4, JSF and ADF BC
I have 2 jspx pages - 1 input page(with bindings to VO) and a lookup page bound to a read-only VO.
page1: I am entering values to all the fields and then saving the form. Now if I had entered an invalid value for one of the fields and try to save - I am checking if value is valid in page1's managed bean and returning error message.
After I get this error message I clear out the invalid value and use the lookup & navigate to the 2nd page fetch a valid value and when I return to my 1st page I am loosing values for some of the fields in my 1st page. Not sure how and this is my first issue! I dont see this behavior if I use the lookup option directly(instead of entering an invalid value, clearing the value after seeing the error message and then going to the lookup page)
Next I am reentering values that I have lost and when I try to save again this time the value I had set from the lookup page is cleared and since this field is required I am getting an exception again. So, basically once there is an error for a field any new value I set gets cleared on commit and i get a required message for the field. Thanks for any clarifications/help with these strange issues.

Fair enough :)
Actually what I was meaning was could I use a collection to repopulate the tabular form when I receive errors. It appears as if it may work. However, I am hitting one snag.
I have created a PL/SQL Process that runs On Submit and Before Computations/Validations. In this process, I have saving the values in the tabular form to a collection.
I was then hoping to create another process that ran after any errors occur. However, it does not appear as if any processes run when the screen redraws after a validation issue. Is there a process that runs after validations when the screen is redrawing? Will I need to do this using javascript?
Thanks

One field gets cleared from ALV to internal table

I have an ALV grid in a view in which i append a row and add some data. This is giving me a very strange problem.
I appended a row in the ALV and then filled up the data in the row. I filled three fields, two of them dates and one a decimal field. Then i saved this data. No problems here.
Now the next time i come on this ALV grid view, i see the previously saved row. I now append another row and fill in some data again. This is where the surprise comes. Out of the two date fields, the first date field is losing its value and is getting cleared when i get the ALV data in an internal table...(using the following code)
node_et_indices_1->get_static_attributes_table( IMPORTING table = lt_indice ).
the lt_indice has the following structure...
field           type
MANDT     MANDT
BUKRS     BUKRS
ZZINDICE     ZEAGR_INDICE
ZZITEM     CHAR3
ZZDESC    CHAR40
ZZINVAL    DATS 8
ZZFIMVAL DATS 8
ZZVATR     DEC
ZZUATR     DEC
ERNAM     ERNAM
AEDAT     AEDAT
ZCORRIG CHAR1
WAERS     WAERS
out of these, the fields zzinval, zzfimval and zzvatr are being populated from webdynpro and the rest of the fields (including the key fields) are populated in the internal table later and then saved to the database.
After executing the above statement, the value in ZZINVAL is 00000000, while on the screen i have entered 01.02.2007. The same does not apply to ZZFIMVAL which holds the value 28.02.2007 as entered on the screen. ZZVATR also holds the correct value entered.
Any ideas why only one of the fields might be getting cleared like this?
The problem does not occur when i am saving only a single row from the ALV.
Please help!!
regards,
Priyank

I have checked that the node itself is not containing the value.
How and what can i check for this. I have mapped the ALV in different views similarly and they are working?
Any ideas on where can i check ??
regards,
Priyank

Gross weight getting cleared

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for