Group By with condition

Hi, my problem is that i want to group Cars under when Total = 50
This is my XML:
<ROW>
<Car>BMW</Car>
<Total>100</Total>
</ROW>
<ROW>
<ROW>
<Car>Audi</Car>
<Total>90</Total>
</ROW>
<ROW>
<Car>Porche</Car>
<Total>40</Total>
</ROW>
<ROW>
<Car>Toyota</Car>
<Total>10</Total>
</ROW>
<ROW>
<Car>Daewo</Car>
<Total>48</Total>
</ROW>
I want to show this:
BMW - 100
Audi - 90
Others - 98
I tried this:
<?for-each-group:ROW;./Nacio?>
<?Car?>
<?xdoxslt:ifelse(.//Total>50, Car,'Others')?>
<?Total?>
<?end for-each-group?>
BUT this show bad:
BMW - 100
Audi - 90
Others - 48
Others - 40
Others - 10
Do you understand me?
thanks

many ways to do :)
let me give you idea
Simple, if you know the names fixed to 3 types.
option1:
BMW = <?sum(/ROOT/ROW[./Car=’BMW’]/Total)?>
Audi = <?sum(/ROOT/ROW[./Car=’Audi’]/Total)?>
Others = <?sum(/ROOT/ROW[(./Car!=’BMW’) and (./Car!=’Audi’)]/Total)?>option2:
<?for-each-group:/ROOT/ROW; xdoxslt:ifelse((./Car!=’BMW’) and (./Car!=’Audi’),’Others’,./Car)?>
<?current-grouping-key()?> = <?sum(current-group()/Total)?>
<?end for-each?>

Similar Messages

How to prevent duplication on a column with condition

Hello everyone,
I need some advice here. At work, we have an Oracle APEX app that allow user to add new records with the automatic increment decision number based on year and group name.
Says if they add the first record , group name AA, for year 2012, they get decision number AA 1 2013 as their displayed record casein the report page.
The second record of AA in 2013 will be AA 2 2013.
If they add about 20 records , it will be AA 20 2013.
The first record for 2014 will be AA 1 2014.
However, recently , we get a user complaint about two records from the same group name have the same decision number.
When I looked into the history table, and find that the time gap between 2 record is just about 0.1 seconds.
Besides, we have lookup table that allows admin user to update the Start Sequence number with the restraint that it has to be larger than the max number of the current group name of the current year.
This Start sequence number and group name is stored together in a table.
And in some other special case,user can add a duplicate decision number for related record. (this is a new function)
The current procedure logic to add new record on the application are
_Get max(decision_number) from record table with chosen Group Name and current year.
_insert into the record table the new entered record with decision number + 1
_ update sequence number to the just added decision number.
So rather than utitlising APEX built-in automatic table modification process, I write a procedure that combine all the three process.
I run some for loop to continuously execute this procedure, and it seems it can autotically generate new unique decision number with time gap about 0.1 second.
However, when I increase the number of entry to 200, and let two users run 100 each.
If the time gap is about 0.01 second, Duplicate decision numbers appear.
What can I do to prevent the duplication ?
I cannot just apply a unique constraint here even for all three columns with condition, as it can have duplicate value in some special condition. I don't know much about using lock and its impact.
This is the content of my procedure
create or replace
PROCEDURE        add_new_case(
--ID just use the trigger
p_case_title IN varchar2,
p_year IN varchar2,
p_group_name IN VARCHAR2,
--decisionnumber here
p_case_file_number IN VARCHAR2,
--active
p_user IN VARCHAR2
AS
default_value NUMBER;
    caseCount NUMBER;
seqNumber NUMBER;
previousDecisionNumber NUMBER;
BEGIN
--execute immediate q'[alter session set nls_date_format='dd/mm/yyyy']';
SELECT count(*)
        INTO caseCount
        FROM CASE_RECORD
        WHERE GROUP_ABBR = p_group_name
        AND to_number(to_char(create_date, 'yyyy')) = to_number(to_char(date_utils.get_current_date, 'yyyy'));
        SELECT max(decision_number)
        INTO previousDecisionNumber
        FROM CASE_RECORD
        WHERE GROUP_ABBR = p_group_name
        AND to_number(to_char(create_date, 'yyyy')) = to_number(to_char(date_utils.get_current_date, 'yyyy'));
        IF p_group_name IS NULL
        THEN seqNumber := 0;
        ELSE
        SELECT seq_number INTO seqNumber FROM GROUP_LOOKUP WHERE ABBREVATION = p_group_name;
        END IF;
    IF caseCount > 0 THEN
           default_value := greatest(seqNumber, previousdecisionnumber)+1;
    ELSE
           default_value := 1;
    END IF;
INSERT INTO CASE_RECORD(case_title, decision_year, GROUP_ABBR, decision_number, case_file_number, active_yn, created_by, create_date)
VALUES(p_case_title, p_year, p_group_name, default_value, p_case_file_number, 'Y', p_user, sysdate );
--Need to update sequence here also
UPDATE GROUP_LOOKUP
SET SEQ_NUMBER = default_value
WHERE ABBREVATION = p_group_name;
COMMIT;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
    logger.error(p_message_text => SQLERRM
                ,p_message_code => SQLCODE
                ,p_stack_trace => dbms_utility.format_error_backtrace
    RAISE;
END;
Many thanks in advance,
Ann

Why not using a sequence for populating the decision_number column ?
Sequence values are guaranteed to be unique so there's no need to lock anything.
You'll inevitably have gaps and no different groups will have the same decision_number in common.
Having to deal with consecutive numbers fixations you can proceed as
with
case_record as
(select 2012 decision_year,'AA' group_abbr,1 decision_number from dual union all
select 2012,'BB',2 from dual union all
select 2012,'AA',21 from dual union all
select 2012,'AA',22 from dual union all
select 2012,'BB',25 from dual union all
select 2013,'CC',33 from dual union all
select 2013,'CC',34 from dual union all
select 2013,'CC',36 from dual union all
select 2013,'BB',37 from dual union all
select 2013,'AA',38 from dual union all
select 2013,'AA',39 from dual union all
select 2013,'BB',41 from dual union all
select 2013,'AA',42 from dual union all
select 2013,'AA',43 from dual union all
select 2013,'BB',45 from dual
select decision_year,
       group_abbr,
       row_number() over (partition by decision_year,group_abbr order by decision_number) decision_number,
       decision_number sequence_number -- not shown (noone needs to know you're using a sequence)
from case_record
order by decision_year,group_abbr,decision_number
DECISION_YEAR
GROUP_ABBR
DECISION_NUMBER
SEQUENCE_NUMBER
2012
AA
1
1
2012
AA
2
21
2012
AA
3
22
2012
BB
1
2
2012
BB
2
25
2013
AA
1
38
2013
AA
2
39
2013
AA
3
42
2013
AA
4
43
2013
BB
1
37
2013
BB
2
41
2013
BB
3
45
2013
CC
1
33
2013
CC
2
34
2013
CC
3
36
for retrieval (assuming decision_year,group_abbr,decision_number as being the key):
select decision_year,group_abbr,decision_number -- the rest of columns
from (select decision_year,
               group_abbr,
-- the rest of columns
               row_number() over (partition by decision_year,group_abbr order by decision_number) decision_number
          from case_record
         where decision_year = :decision_year
           and group_abbr = :group_abbr
where decision_number = :decision_number
DECISION_YEAR
GROUP_ABBR
DECISION_NUMBER
2013
AA
4
if that's acceptable
Regards
Etbin

Count(*) , group by with multiple columns from multiple tables involved

Hi all,
I am relatively new to SQL.
Currently I have these few requirements, to display quite a number of fields from 3 tables for display of report.
In my query I need to:
1.) count(*)
2.) select quite a number of fields from table 1,2,3
However when count(*) is used, grouped by has to be used to.
How do I actually use group by with so many columns to be selected?
I have actually used the query below, but the count(*) returns 1, the correct output should be 3 instead.
select count(*), table1.col1, table1.col2, table1.col3, table2.col3, table2.col4, table2.col6, table3.col1, table3.col4, table3.col5
from table1, table2, table3
where
<conditions>........................
group by table1.col1, table1.col2, table1.col3, table2.col3, table2.col4, table2.col6, table3.col1, table3.col4, table3.col5
I know this group by statement looks very unrefined. How can I select multiple fields from different tables, and yet get the count(*) correctly?
Thank you so much for your time.

Hmm yes it actually does return count as 1 for each row. But there are 3 rows returned. E.g.
ctr table1.col1 table1.col2 ..........
1 value1 value1
1 value2 value3
1 value3 value4
If I put the count(*) outside, it returns 3 , the correct output
ctr
3
select count(*) from
select table1.col1, table1.col2, table1.col3, table2.col3, table2.col4, table2.col6, table3.col1, table3.col4, table3.col5
from table1, table2, table3
where
<conditions>
group by table1.col1, table1.col2, table1.col3, table2.col3, table2.col4, table2.col6, table3.col1, table3.col4, table3.col5
Thus I was wondering if it was the group by of multiple colns that resulted in the count stucked at value 1.

SUM function with condition in RTF template

Hi All,
I have a problem in calculating the SUM in RTF template with condition,
Here is the XML
- <LIST_G_LINE_NOTES>
- <G_LINE_NOTES>
<LINE_TRX_ID>1567856</LINE_TRX_ID>
<LINE_ID />
- <LIST_G_TRX_LINE>
- <G_TRX_LINE>
<CF_ITEM_NO>SDCN1144B</CF_ITEM_NO>
</G_TRX_LINE>
</LIST_G_TRX_LINE>
- <LIST_G_LINE_EQUIVALENT_UNIT_PRICE>
- <G_LINE_EQUIVALENT_UNIT_PRICE>
<LINE_EQUIVALENT_UNIT_PRICE>-15.99</LINE_EQUIVALENT_UNIT_PRICE>
<LINE_EXCHANGE_EXTENDED_AMOUNT>-223.86</LINE_EXCHANGE_EXTENDED_AMOUNT>
<CUSTOMER_TRX_LINE_ID>1567856</CUSTOMER_TRX_LINE_ID>
</G_LINE_EQUIVALENT_UNIT_PRICE>
</LIST_G_LINE_EQUIVALENT_UNIT_PRICE>
- <LIST_G_TRX_LINE>
- <G_TRX_LINE>
<CF_ITEM_NO></CF_ITEM_NO>
</G_TRX_LINE>
</LIST_G_TRX_LINE>
I need the summation of field LINE_EXCHANGE_EXTENDED_AMOUNT with the condition CF_ITEM_NO!=''
can anybody help me with the solution.
Thanks in Advance

Kavipriya,
Here is the XML
<LIST_G_LINE_NOTES>
<G_LINE_NOTES>
<LINE_TRX_ID>1567856</LINE_TRX_ID>
<LINE_ID />
<LIST_G_TRX_LINE>
<G_TRX_LINE>
<LINE_DELIVERY_ID />
<DISCOUNT>0</DISCOUNT>
<CP_LN_TAX_AMT />
<CF_ITEM_NO>SDCN1144B</CF_ITEM_NO>
</G_TRX_LINE>
</LIST_G_TRX_LINE>
<LIST_G_LINE_EQUIVALENT_UNIT_PRICE>
<G_LINE_EQUIVALENT_UNIT_PRICE>
<LINE_EXCHANGE_EXTENDED_AMOUNT>-223.86</LINE_EXCHANGE_EXTENDED_AMOUNT>
</G_LINE_EQUIVALENT_UNIT_PRICE>
</LIST_G_LINE_EQUIVALENT_UNIT_PRICE>
</G_LINE_NOTES>
Edited by: user13012317 on Mar 10, 2011 11:00 PM

In a group text with two phones that use Imessage and one that does not. The person that does not, does not get my message when its sent in group text. How do i fix this?

I have a group text with two of my friends. here's each person break down
person 1 ATT network, using imessage
person 2 verzion network, using imessage
person 3 verzion network, using SMS
All three of us are in a group chat. When person 1 sends a message, person 2 recieves it, but person 3 does not. Then when person 3 sends a message, both person 1 and 2 get it. When person 2 sends an Imessage, person 1 and 3 get it
so the problem is when person 1 sends an imessage, it doesnt change to sms and person 3 doesnt get it, but person 2's automatilly switches it to green.
How can person one get their phone to automaticlly switch it to green in group message while keeping on imessage?

The quote below from http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5760 indicates that it in the situation you describe it should be going as MMS to everyone -- which is not what you are seeing actually happen (and also not what you want to happen if I understand correctly). There may be something else helpful in the link.
Group messages will be sent using iMessage if all recipients have iMessage enabled. If not, the conversation will be sent as MMS. Group messages use MMS even if the content is text only.

Is it possible to create a Column with Conditional Mandatory with another Column?

Is it possible to create a Column with Conditional Mandatory with another Column?
For example
In a Table we have column A, B, C.
A is Primary Column.
B is Optional
C is Conditional Mandatory.
A B
C
12345 ABC
OK
12346 NULL
NULL
12347 ABC
OK
Only if the B Column has the value then only C column should be mandatory

I guess you can't create a condtional mandatory column directly. However, you can use check constraint to on the column
create table YourTable
A int primary key,
B char(3),
C int,
constraint ch_con check(
B
is not null
or C is null

How to restrict users working on Windows 7 clients from accessing Windows Explorer and other systems in the network through Group Policy with a domain controller running on Windows Server 2008 r2

Dear All,
We are having an infrastructure setup of around 500 client computers managed through group policy.
Recently the domain controllers have been migrated from Windows Server 2003 to Server 2008 R2.
Since this account requires extremely strict environment, we need to figure the solution for restricting the users from access anything locally.
It would be great if you can assist me with the following query.
How to restrict users logged on Windows 7 clients from accessing Windows Explorer and browsing other systems in the network through Group Policy with a domain controller running on Windows Server 2008 r2 ?
Can we disable Network Tab on the left hand pane ?
explorer.exe is blocked already, but users are able to enter the Windows Explorer by clicking on the name which is visible on the Start Menu.

>   * explorer.exe is blocked already, but users are able to enter the
>    Windows Explorer by clicking on the name which is visible on the
>    Start Menu.
You cannot block explorer.exe when you do not replace the shell - the
desktop you see effectively IS explorer.exe...
Your requirement sounds like you need a custom shell:
http://gpsearch.azurewebsites.net/#2812
Martin
Mal ein
GUTES Buch über GPOs lesen?
NO THEY ARE NOT EVIL, if you know what you are doing:
Good or bad GPOs?
And if IT bothers me - coke bottle design refreshment :))

Scheduling Agreement With Condition Type Calc.

Hi All,
Can i have Scheduling Agreement With Condition Type Calc. as in PO Conditions as there are some calculation need to be made based on Excise.
Thanks in advance
Sapuser

Hi,
Condition in scheduling agreeement are time dependent where as condition in purchase order time independent so it's not possible to use.
Regards
Ravi Shankar.

How to activate Approval in Sales Order for the UDF with condition

Dear Expert,
                   I have created the UDF field Rebate(type amount) in Sales Order.I want to activate the approval procedure for this UDF with condition where Rebate is greater then Zero.I had applied the query and Activate it in approval procedure.--
SELECT (Case When IsNull(count(T0.[DocEntry]),0) <>0 Then 'True' Else 'False' End) AS TF
FROM Ordr T0   where DocType='I' AND t0.U_rebate >0 and convert(Varchar(20),T0.[CreateDate],103) =(select convert(Varchar(20),Getdate(),103))
But I found that the approval procedure activate every time inspite the Rebate field is Zero.
Plaese suggest some soloution for it.
regards,
PankajK

Hi Pankaj......
Try this.......
Select Distinct 'True' From ORDR T0 Where T0.U_Rebate>0 and T0.DocType='I' And T0.DocNum=$[ORDR.DocNum.0]
Hope this will help you.......
Regards,
Rahul

Group Text with Android Doesn't Work

Hi- I had been using an iPhone for a few years, and decided to switch over to Android. It took some time to get my phone number disassociated from iMessage/iCloud, but I was eventually able to get that done. Since iOS8 came out, though, I'm starting to experience problems again. Specifically, whenever I group text with multiple iPhone users, everything works fine -- until my wife (an iPhone 6 user) is added into the group. When this happens, everything automatically switches back to iMessage and I stop receiving any messages.
Has anyone else experienced this? Are there any fixes?
Thanks

Just in case other people found my post by Googling, here is my fix I added to my post on the OpenOffice forum.
Re: Text to speech only reads the document title
by Trish8 » Sat Feb 14, 2015 9:58 am
I tried as many suggestions as I could from the plethora of suggestions above. I'm sure you are correct, it must be the Mac's problem. I took a chance and downloaded LibreOffice; Text to Speech now works the same as it does on TextEdit, the internet, and PdF. Thanks for all the help, I mean that sincerely. OpenOffice is a really fine product.
Patt

Merge text file with condition

I have two text files (report1.txt and report2.txt) that I want to merge with conditions:
- Matching rows that have same "ID" and same "TranVal", will keep only one instance
- Mismatching rows that have same "ID" both rows from 2 file, but column "TranVal" has different value, then the row from report2.txt will replace row in report1.txt
- Any "ID" that exists in one textfile but not the other one, will be copied to the final merged file
report1.txt:
TranDate,ID,TranVal,Comment
061211,9840,40,done
061211,9841,30,done
061211,9842,28,done
report2.txt:
TranDate,ID,TranVal,Comment
061211,9840,40,done
061211,9841,89,done
061211,9843,25,done
Final result should be:
merge.txt:
TranDate,ID,TranVal,Comment
061211,9840,40,done
061211,9841,89,done
061211,9842,28,done
061211,9843,25,done

Hi,
I just checked Import-Csv option. I will be able to manage this problem if i can get it in CSV format and work with objects, BUT the problem is in my real file
the file-format is different which is not comma-separated, instead have "-" as seperator. To simplify the problem i used comma in my question.
TranDate,ID,TranVal,Comment
061211-9840-40-done
Could
you suggest me if there is any way to convert "-" separators to CSV?

Can I group charts with objects in Numbers 3.0?

In Numbers 2.1 I could group charts with objects and text. I can't get this to work in Numbers 3.0. The objects will group but not the charts.
I used this to create marked-up charts in Numbers and paste them into a Pages document.
(I just purchased a new iMac and don't have the old Numbers on it.)

The only way around this is to print to PDF and open in preview, then use the rectangular selection tool to select the are you want to add to pages, then copy, then paste into Pages.
You can post feedback to Apple using the menu item "Numbers > Provide Numbers Feedback"
There are several features that were dropped and may be added back in... see this link:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT6049?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US

Set "peoples or groups" field with current user "login name" in sharepoint list form using javascript

hi friends
i am trying to set peoples or groups field in sharepoint list form with current user login name
here my code
<script src="http://ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jquery/jquery-1.9.0.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function NewItemView () {
var currentUser;
   if (SP.ClientContext != null) {
      SP.SOD.executeOrDelayUntilScriptLoaded(getCurrentUser, 'SP.js');
   else {
      SP.SOD.executeFunc('sp.js', null, getCurrentUser);
   function getCurrentUser() {
      var context = new SP.ClientContext.get_current();
      var web = context.get_web();
      currentUser = web.get_currentUser();
      context.load(currentUser);
      context.executeQueryAsync(onSuccessMethod, onRequestFail);
   function onSuccessMethod(sender, args) {
      var account = currentUser.get_loginName();
      var accountEmail = currentUser.get_email();
      var currentUserAccount = account.substring(account.indexOf("|") + 1);
   SetAndResolvePeoplePicker("requester",account);
// This function runs if the executeQueryAsync call fails.
   function onRequestFail(sender, args) {
      alert('request failed' + args.get_message() + '\n' + args.get_stackTrace());
function SetAndResolvePeoplePicker(fieldName, userAccountName) {
   var controlName = fieldName;
    var peoplePickerDiv = $("[id$='ClientPeoplePicker'][title='" + controlName + "']");
    var peoplePickerEditor = peoplePickerDiv.find("[title='" + controlName + "']");
    var spPeoplePicker = SPClientPeoplePicker.SPClientPeoplePickerDict[peoplePickerDiv[0].id];
    peoplePickerEditor.val(userAccountName);
    spPeoplePicker.AddUnresolvedUserFromEditor(true);
</script>
but it is not working
please help me

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that you wanted to set "peoples or groups" field with current user "login name" in SharePoint list form using JavaScript.
To set "peoples or groups" field with current user "login name”, you can use the below code:
<script src="http://ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jquery/jquery-1.9.0.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
function SetPickerValue(pickerid, key, dispval) {
var xml = '<Entities Append="False" Error="" Separator=";" MaxHeight="3">';
xml = xml + PreparePickerEntityXml(key, dispval);
xml = xml + '</Entities>';
EntityEditorCallback(xml, pickerid, true);
function PreparePickerEntityXml(key, dispval) {
return '<Entity Key="' + key + '" DisplayText="' + dispval + '" IsResolved="True" Description="' + key + '"><MultipleMatches /></Entity>';
function GetCurrentUserAndInsertIntoUserField() {
var context = new SP.ClientContext.get_current();
var web = context.get_web();
this._currentUser = web.get_currentUser();
context.load(this._currentUser);
context.executeQueryAsync(Function.createDelegate(this, this.onSuccess),
Function.createDelegate(this, this.onFailure));
function onSuccess(sender, args) {
SetPickerValue('ctl00_m_g_99f3303a_dffa_4436_8bfa_3511d9ffddc0_ctl00_ctl05_ctl01_ctl00_ctl00_ctl04_ctl00_ctl00_UserField', this._currentUser.get_loginName(),
this._currentUser.get_title());
function onFaiure(sender, args) {
alert(args.get_message() + ' ' + args.get_stackTrace());
ExecuteOrDelayUntilScriptLoaded(GetCurrentUserAndInsertIntoUserField, "sp.js");
</script>
More information:
http://alexeybbb.blogspot.com/2012/10/sharepoint-set-peoplepicker-via-js.html
Best Regards,
Linda Li
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

TS3276 how to send a group email with iPhone 5

how to send a group email with iPhone 5

I have a new OSX 27" iMac that is running Maverick.
RE: group emails, I am trying to omit individual recients and have tried the following options without success.
1) Mail- Composing- checked "Automatically- Bcc"
2) Mail- Composing- unchecked "when sending to a group, show all member addresses"
The result is that all names continue to show up with email addresses for group emails.
HELP! HELP! HELP!
Lynn

How to send an group email with text and photo with out having google trash it

how to send a group email with imac 21.5 8.1 Yosemite gmail without having it trashed automatically

Check the settings on the machine(s) that are trashing it.

Group By with condition

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for