Group Policy item for Security Center

What's the easiest way to do this?
I want to disable the security center popup.Windows XP Pro SP2, zen 3.2sp2
Roaming profiles (for students, a single volatile profile is in use).
I've attempted a few things to get this screen from showing up. I run
fortres, but the security center screen comes up before fortres has
initialized on the machine. I've tried wiping out the wscntfy.exe, but it's
self-repairing.
I tried to build an adm to add to the user extensible policies in the
package, but it's either being ignored or I've got the wrong key
(HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Security Center\FirstRun=dword:00000001).
I noticed that if I turn off the notification on the workstation, it appears
to be in the LM hive and sticks around for subsequent users. But the next
user to use the machine has the thing pop up everytime (because the
notification that they have seen the screen once disappears when their
profile is wiped out).
I guessed that this is the time that I would truly have to switch over to
Windows Group Policies rather than relying on the unsupported user
extensible policies (which have been working fine for me for quite some
time).
But when I tried to get the security center in the group policy editor
(launched from console 1), it isn't there at all. How do I add the proper
snapin to this editor so that I can apply security center settings?
Chris Denby
IT Coordinator
Rainy River District School Board
Fort Frances, Ontario
Canada

Chris,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Do a search of our knowledgebase at http://support.novell.com/search/kb_index.jsp
- Check all of the other support tools and options available at
http://support.novell.com.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://support.novell.com/forums)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://support.novell.com/forums/faq_general.html
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://support.novell.com/forums/

Similar Messages

Group Policy design for Terminal Server

Hi, I am mixed about group policy design for Terminal server
My Infrastructure is so;
Zone
      ->Department
                   ->User
                   ->Computers
      ->Department
                   ->User
                   ->Computers
      ->Department
                   ->User
                   ->Computers
Server
       ->OtherServer
        ->TerminalServer (TerminalComputersGPO)
I create two group policy for user and for terminal server computers (security filtered for Terminal_Users)
I want to use terminal server user policy but it must effect
just in terminal computers. not TS user's computers. what i must do? where i must locate it?
Please click "Vote As Helpful" if it is helpful for you and "Propose as Answer"

Hi Davut EREN - TAT,
According to your description, you would like
terminal server user policy applying to users which log on to terminal computers. Right?
As MuhammadUmar's suggestion, you can use Loopback in replace mode. The GPO list for the user is replaced in its entirety by the GPO list that is already obtained for the computer at computer startup.
In the real work environment Loopback processing of Group Policy is usually used on Terminal Servers. For example we have users with enabled folder redirection settings, but we do not want these folder redirection to work when the users log on to the
Terminal Server, in this case we enable Loopback processing of Group s Computer account and do not enable the folder redirection settings.
For more information about this policy, please refer to the following articles:
Loopback processing with merge or replace
Loopback processing of Group Policy
Regards,
Lany Zhang

Re:- How to see customer/vendor open items for profit center wise

any one help me regarding : How to see customer/vendor open items for profit center wise. That is possiable or not please suggest to me. I am using 4.6c version .

Run the report from Tcode FBL1N for vendor open item and from FBL5N fron Customer open items.
When you get the report, click on Change Layout icon ( or press Control + F8 from keyboard), search Profit Center fron the Table of Hidden fields on the right hand side. Move that field to the Left hand side table. Click ok, now you should be able to see the Profit Center column in your report.
You can save this layout by clicking on the Save Layout icon ( or press Control + F12 from keyboard)
Next time you can choose the saved layout by clicking on the Select Layout icon ( or press Control + F9 from keyboard)
Regards
Dharmveer

Extractor of Line Items for Profit center

Hi
I am trying to find an Business Content Extractor of Line Items for profit center.
Under Controling I could fined a data store for Cost Center, But could not fined the same for Profit Center.
It has to be part of Co and not of FI
Regards

For profit center delta line items use 0EC_PCA_3. Periodic transfer use 0EC_PCA_4.
pls assign points to say thanks.

Group policy template for Novell Client for Windows 7

Does anyone know if there is a group policy template for the Novell Client for Windows 7? I find it really hard to believe that Novell has not yet released one, but I cannot find one anywhere. We use ZCM 11.2, and I really need to be able to send out settings for the client via a group policy.
By the way, I am also posting this on the Novell Client forum, but since this is also a ZCM thing, I am hoping I might get some feedback here.
Rick P

Two recent/new resources are available for the Novell Client 2 SP3 for Windows:
Cool Solutions AppNote: Novell Client 2 SP3 for Windows: Registry Settings
Novell Client 2 SP3 for Windows: Registry Settings | Novell User Communities
Cool Solutions Tool: Group Policy Administrative Template for Novell Client 2 SP3 for Windows
Group Policy Administrative Template for Novell Client 2 SP3 for Windows | Novell User Communities

Group Policy Item level targeting LDAP Query for specific AD Sites

Hi Everyone,
I'm looking to try and take advantage of Group Policy Preference Item Level Targeting to publish user Proxy settings based on what AD Site a user is located in.
The company I work for has multiple proxies (for multiple regions). We have hundreds of AD Sites listed within our AD S and S setup. I know that I could potentially list every AD Site that requires a particular proxy, but this would generate additional admin
overhead each time a new site is commissioned, as well as each time a site is decommissioned (this is a construction company, so may "sites" can fluctuate rapidly).
Due to this, I would like to know if it is possible to filter by LDAP query, and filter for each proxy, based on a portion of the text/name of the AD Sites (as we use a specific naming convention for our sites, this could be dynamic enough for us to not
have to add or remove additional AD sites).
Is this possible, and, if so, how would I write the LDAP Filter/Query??
Right now I would assume I would do it in the following manner:
(&(objectCategory=site)(objectClass=site)(cn=AU-*)
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers,
Simon

> Right now I would assume I would do it in the following manner:
>
> (&(objectCategory=site)(objectClass=site)(cn=AU-*)
Sites do NOT reside in the domain partition, but in the configuration
partition... You can verify your LDAP filter with
dsquery * -filter "(your filter here)"
This query will return all matching objects' distinguished names (DN).
But why don't you use the "Sites" ILT instead? This ILT supports ? and *
as wildcards, so it might be sufficient.
Martin
Mal ein
GUTES Buch über GPOs lesen?
NO THEY ARE NOT EVIL, if you know what you are doing:
Good or bad GPOs?
And if IT bothers me - coke bottle design refreshment :))

Question on a specific Group Policy setting for SCCM Updates

Hello,
This may not exactly be the correct forum for this question but in looking around I didn't come up with an immediate answer and was hoping someone else had this issue.
I have a WSUS server and am moving over to SCCM for updates. I've actually had success in getting 2 sets of patches installed after some very frustrating days thanks to people here.
I've noticed that when I switch workstations to my AD folder that has the SCCM Updates GPO instead of our standard WSUS GPO that we get action center errors "Set up Windows Update", "Windows Update is not set up". When we click
the flag it tells us to "Choose an Update Option".
In my new GPO I do have Configure Automatic Updates Enabled for "Auto Download and notify for install" but we still get this warning. Is there a differnet setting that controls this action that anyone is aware of in their experience? I looked
through the other settings but didn't se anything obvious.
Thanks for any help!

Hi Dustin,
I'd read a number of different things trying to solve the problem. That article looked a little familiar but I re-read it carefully.
I do have "specify intranet Microsoft Update service location" set to Not Configured as someone had correctly pointed me to that as the reason I was not getting updates.
I did not have "Allow signed updates from an Intranet Micorsoft update server" enabled so that shoudl help some.
"Configure Automatic Updates" was enabled because I, incorectly, thoguth that's all that might be needed since Ihad to make sure I'd Not Configured the first setting.
I had "Turn on Recommended Updates" Enabled so I put it back to not configured.
I understand that turning things to Not Configured doesn't necessarily change any previous group policy settings so I may be getting some fallout from having a WSUS server on these systems before. I'd just like to aviod having to have everyone go into the
action center and manually click to configure updates.
I'll see if my one setting change has any effect.
UPDATE: I forced a gpupdate and the red flag in the action center has not disappeared.

Group policy preference for creating printers setting the wrong printer as default

Hi
We have a a group policy preference applied to users. At the moment we create a shared printer and set it as default for all users in a specific OU. Now we need to add another shared printer. I have updated the policy and set it to create
the new shared printer and have set item level targeting to the same OU as the first printer. I want to keep the existing printer as the default, however when the policy runs, the new printer is created fine but it is set as the default
printer. Is this because it has been added last ? There doesn't seem to be a way of changing the order that the printers are applied.
Both printers are Shared printers and are set to Create
The existing printer (printer A) is set as the default printer. It is targeted at the London OU.
The new printer (printer B) has NOT been set as default. It is targeted at the London OU.
No other options have been set.
When the policy is applied both printers are added but printer B is being set as the default.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
G

Hi G,
>>however when the policy runs, the new printer is created fine but it is set as the default printer. Is this because it has been added last ? There doesn't seem to be a way of changing the order that the printers are applied.
Before going further, what's the operating systems of our clients? Here, I need to double confirm that the checkbox of
Set this printer as the default printer... is not selected in the new GPP Printer item. Besides, we can change the orders of the printer items. To do this, select the printer item, right click, click All Tasks, and choose Move Up or Move
Down to change the order.
Best regards,
Frank Shen
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

Proxy details keep deleting from field in Group Policy Preferences for IE 10 on windows 7 and 8

We have a lot of users who on the last update and have seemed to manage to install IE 10 onto their windows 7 machines as now causing all sorts of issues. I know that IEM has been replaced in favour of Group Policy Preferences and I have build a windows
8 machine just to create a group policy preference as you are unable to create the preferences from windows 7, thank you Microsoft!
I have created a test OU and got a win 7 and a win 8 machine both with IE 10 for testing. I have created the preference settings, home page etc and disabled using the F keys the advanced features that we do not require as from reading in other post even
if it is not ticked, if it is green then it will apply it, kinda defeats the using the tick but it is what it is!
When we do a gpupdate it picks up the default homepage as well as other settings but the proxy settings is blank. I then went back into the preferences I created for IE 10 and checked the connections, LAN settings and the proxy server name is missing but
both ticks are showing for the proxy settings and when you click on advanced it shows the proxy server and port details fine. I have been working on this now for 4 days and getting no where to a point were we just roll back any users on IE 10 back to IE 9.
I have also unlinked any other gpo relating to Internet settings on the test OU just in case there are conflicts. Any ideas as where to go from here?

In the end to get around the proxy settings I had to create a registry key preference with proxy and port details which seemed to have done the trick and now IE 10 is picking up the proxy details and displaying webpages

I purchased an item for 1 cent and the shipping was 7.80 $. What can I do?

The cost of shipping has no relationship to the price or value of the item purchased. The weight, and the distance it travels determine shipping cost. The shipping cost is usually listed on the item's auction page. You are expected to read the entire auction listing before you bid. By bidding, you are agreeing to the shipping charge. If it is coming from outside your country of residence, free shipping usually only applies to the country where the seller resides. Basically, you bid, you pay. If you do not pay, the seller may file an unpaid item complaint against you. 2 of those in one year usually results in triggering an automatic block in most sellers who will not accept bids from buyers with 2 or more unpaid items.

The item you purchased has a value of $7.81.Part of that was for the item. Part of that was for the shipping.Which is cheapest?A penny item with $7.80 shipping?A $7.80 item with one cent shipping?A $7.81 item with 'free' shipping? What do you do? You pay for the purchase. It was this sort of insulting listing, pretending that an item was cheap and then piling on the shipping, that encouraged eBay some years ago to charge sellers a fee on the cost of shipping.It used to be that a smartalec seller would only be paying fees on the penny sale, nothing on the shipping, which was the real cost of the item.That has to the great annoyance of honest sellers, not been the case for several years. You have up to 60 days to leave feedback. The most effective feedback is calm and factual. 'Inflates shipping to avoid fees Unaware of FVF changes.' for example.At the same time you will be asked to leave Detailed Seller Ratings, which are much more important.A normal transaction gets 5 Stars. The lowest Rating is ONE STAR. No stars are a free pass.If a seller's DSRs drop below 4.3, his ability to list and sell on eBay are restricted. His fees may rise. Or he may be removed from the site.Leave Detailed Seller Ratings. And in future.Read the whole listing including the shipping fees to CanadaIf there are not fees listed for Canada, contact the seller for a firm quote. If he refuses or the quote is too high, don't bid.If you are shopping on a mobile device, cross check the listing on a laptop or desktop before bidding. Mobiles have limited information for the shopper.

Configuration issue on two items for system center 2012 config manager

My first issue was at the beginning of the install trying to extend the AD schema for system center 2012 config manager version 7.5.1561.0. The
path is missing for SMSSetup\Bin\x64\ to execute
Extadsch.exe is not on my disc. There is only a x86 and 64 bit folder with no bin.
Second issue when creating configuration manager connector. Error connecting to the database. So i went to my sqlserver and checked the permissions on the account I did notice that there are no smsdbrole_extract role permissions. Did I miss a step somewhere
along the way? On a side not that this is an instance and not under the default place. Also, i am using sql 2008 R2 version.

OK, nothing wrong with that per se, but it has nothing to do with ConfigMgr. Also, ConfigMgr is not a "module", it's a distinct product unto itself with its own unique requirements and dependencies that is also architecturally completely different. So,
there's nothing to uninstall to install ConfigMgr. Also, I hope you're not trying to install these products on the same server. That is OK for a small lab environment, but nothing more. Even then, I wouldn't do it since its never something you'd do in production.
As mentioned, each product has its own unique dependencies with no true overlap.
Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com

Table to see the line items for cost center-ECC 6.0

Hi,
Which is the table to get the line items in controlling with cost center & WBS information.
Regards,
Vipin

Check with below tables :
COSS, COSPP, COSSP, COSL, COSR ,COSP.
Check with below link
http://www.sap-img.com/financial/important-tables-in-sap-co.htm
Thanks
Seshu

Report KSB2 - CO Committment line item for Cost center

When the report is executed, system provides the Fiscal year as next year data.
Can some body help me in understanding why system behave like this.
regards
ARvind

I got the solution from COEP table.

[Forum FAQ] Group Policy Preferences Scheduled Tasks Item not working when the option Run whether user is logged on or not is selected

Scenario:
We use one of the following Group Policy Preferences Scheduled Tasks item to deploy a task to clients:
Computer Configuration -> Control Panel Settings -> Scheduled Tasks -> New -> Scheduled Task (At least Windows 7)
Computer Configuration -> Control Panel Settings -> Scheduled Tasks -> New -> Immediate Task (At least Windows 7)
User Configuration -> Control Panel Settings -> Scheduled Tasks -> New -> Scheduled Task (At least Windows 7)
User Configuration -> Control Panel Settings -> Scheduled Tasks -> New -> Immediate Task (At least Windows 7)
(Note that on some platforms, "At least Windows 7" is replaced with "Windows Vista and later.")
After designating a user account to run the task, we select “Run whether user is logged on or not” option, and “The Do not store password…”
check box is automatically grayed out (See Figure 1).
Figure 1
After finishing configuring the task item, on a client, we run command
gpupdate/force to forcefully update group policy. However, on the client, when we check if the task is listed in Task Scheduler snap-in, the task is not displayed, and when we run
gpresult/h report.html to collect group policy result for troubleshooting, we see an error as similar as shown in the following figure (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Cause:
To make the scheduled task run whether the user is logged on or not, we need to store the password of the designated user account. However, for the content of the scheduled
task item is stored in Sysvol where it’s not safe to store passwords, this function has been deprecated.
Workaround:
We can run the task with system account
NT Authority\System, or we can use specific user accounts to run the task when the given user is logged on. (See Figure 3)
Figure 3
Reference:
MS14-025: Vulnerability in Group Policy Preferences could allow elevation of privilege: May 13, 2014
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2962486
Please click to vote if the post helps you. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Hello Everyone,
Succeeded !!!!!!!
Even i was struggling with this same Problem to execute a batch via Window scheduler and set the setting to "Run whether the user is logged in or not".
I tried many time but the batch runs with " Run
whether user is logged on" and not with "Run
whether user is logged on or not".
what i discovered is that there was one mapped drive
path in my batch file which was not the complete path like y:/AR.qvw actually what i did i changed that map path to the complete path like \\servnamename\d$\AR.qvw and the batch executed successfully with the setting "Run
whether user is logged on or not"
The
conclusion is that check the dependency of the script on external resources because when you check this option "Run
whether user is logged on or not" It actually conflicts. This my discovery.
If
you have any question write me on [email protected]
Thanks
& Regards,
Arun

Group Policy - Security Templates?

Evening all,
I hope someone would be able to give me some advice on the best way of setting this group policy up for a production system.
1. I have a group called 'Team Users' - this group is a global security group and the members of this group are in the companys HR department.
2. We have just set some brand new servers up with Windows Servers 2012 R2 installed and the application has been installed correctly on to the D:. - We like to keep it so that the C: is strictly Operating System only.
3. On the D: we have the following folder structure:
- Install
- Application
- Program Files
What I want to do is set it up so that this group 'Team Users' can log on to the server but only be able to modify anything in the Application folder. We don't want them to have any modify access to any other folders on the D:
This team have a previous history of having access to the C: and dragging and dropping files / folders on to the C: in certain locations. I don't want this to happen again. What is the best way of stopping the users from doing this without stopping the drive
from working or affecting the Application?
Are there any Microsoft guides or recommendations in regards to giving end users access to log on to servers etc?

this doesn't seem to be a GP specific question, in that you seem to want to restrict the user-level access to volumes/folders/files, either by access permissions or by quota ? (neither of which are really possible using GP)
you might use GP to perform folder redirection, i.e. to redirect the users "my documents" etc away from storing on C:, and instead store them on D:, perhaps D:\userdata ?
by default, user account would not be added into the Administrators group of the server, which will natively restrict those accounts from placing files into System folders.
you would also take steps to ensure that these users are not granted nor would they inherit permissions to create folders/files on D:\ (except for the explicit folders you mentioned above.
if you grant these users read/write/modify permissions to D:\Application, that won't stop those users from filling up D: with content in the D:\Application folder, so you might want to consider quotas.
The FSRM feature might be useful to you for that.
Don
(Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer", where applicable.
This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognises useful contributions. Thanks!)

Group Policy item for Security Center

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for