Guest users issue??

Hello,
I am expieriencing a weird behavior in the WLAN for guest users.
I can create tipical guest users and it redirects me to the sign in web page (there is no web auth server, it's done by the WLC itself) and it works normally. But I am having several domain users getting logged with their domain username and passwords eventhough they are not registered as guestusers.
How can I avoid this situation?
Thanks in advance!

Hello,
What you are seeing may be due in fact to the WLAN's usage of the Radius servers from the global list, even if not directly specified under the WLAN's configuration:
Radius Servers
Authentication................................ Global Servers
Accounting.................................... Global Servers
A very quick test to confirm this would be to uncheck the option "Network User" for all the Radius servers, under
SECURITY > RADIUS > Authentication
WLC 4.2 was not yet allowing to select which method to use to authenticate web auth users (local, Radius, or LDAP).
Starting from later versions such as 6.0 we have further features that allow us to do that (see attached screenshot).
In your case, on the Radius server, you may want to filter Radius access-requests coming from users connecting through the SSID "visitas".
In ACS 4.2 for example, this can be done through NAPs:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_secure_access_control_server_for_windows/4.2/user/guide/NAPs.html#wp1128143
In the Radius access-request, the WLC is including the following attributes (among others):
Called-Station-Id: this should come in the form of "WLC mac:BSSID:SSID name)
Airespace-WLAN-Id: this is the index of the WLAN through which the user is connecting
So you could build a NAP in ACS that checks whether the Radius attribute Airespace-WLAN-Id has the same index as the "visitas" SSID (or the Called-Station-Id contains the string "visitas") and, if so, fail the authentication.
Hope this helps,
Fede
If this helps you and/or answers your question please mark the question as "answered" and/or rate it, so other users can easily find it.

Similar Messages

GUEST user issue in the workflow

Some of our users want to have the GUEST user profile option enabled to check the Workflow notifications so that they
don't have to login to approve the workflow notifications but they can be able
to approve notifications from the link they receive in the workflow email
notifications.
Everything looks ok but some custom workflows are unable to retrieve the details of the persons who approve or reject the notifications. It
returns the approver as GUEST and the rejector as GUEST.
Is there anyway we can remove the link which says "Please Click here to respond" from specific
workflows in the email notifiication?
Is there anyway to retrieve the approvers or the rejectors username or email address even though the GUEST user is enabled?
Please advice.
Thank You
--Pavan K

You can change it :
1) Login to Oracle Applications
2) Select Workflow Administrator Web Application responsibility
3) Then select Workflow Manager
4) Then Notification Mailer
Now edit the Notification Mailer Component's parameters. On 4th or 5th page , you will see some template configuration.
Open Mail Template : OPEN_MAIL ( "Workflow Open Mail (Templated)" )
Bounce Workflow Mailer Service and check it.

Wireless Guest Users DHCP issue

Dear all
We have 2 wism as well as Anchor controller
Guest users are getting ip address from anchor controller.
We had created DHCP scope on anchor controller itself.
We had opened particular ports to communicate between guest controller and inside controller for EOIP tunneling to take place.
Issue is that some times user is getting IP address in the range of AP management vlan.
Do we require to open ports for bootpc and bootps as well or do we need to create dhcp scope in the switch.
If any one has faced the above issue pls reply me at the earliest.
Regards
-Danish

If the anchor goes down, or mobility fails, the user should never egress from the Foreign WLC (in my opinion). However, if you are saying that the user gets an IP from the MGMT Interface of the Foreign WLC (not the Anchor), then it is doing exactly what it shouldn't.
What version of code is this?
I've seen a lot of deployments implement a "dummy interface" on the Foreign WLC. So a fake vlan/subnet is created on the WLC and mapped as the default interface for the Foreign's Guest WLAN. In the event anchoring does fail and the client sticks to the foreign WLC this dummy interface would actually prevent the user from having network access.
Are you seeing this often?

Guest User Log In Issue

Hello, I hope this is an easy fix...I would like to add a guest user account on my macbook. I did everything correctly in the step by step support page. When I power up it shows two login options, myself (admin) and guest. When I click on guest the screen just shakes, assuming it's telling me that I cannot log in as a guest.
Everything thing works fine when I log in as my user.
Any suggestions? I think it might be some kind of security setting or something that I did.
Thank you, JJ

Thank you for your reply and yes I tried that several times. I ended up disabling the guest account and just created a new user named "guest user"...quick fix.
And yes it sure does seem very simple, just click the box to enable guest...not in my case tho :-D

Why does GarageBand audio work for guest user but not my account?

Hello, I have a 15-inch MacBook Pro (2.2 GHz Intel Core i7, 4GB 1333 MHz DDR3) from late 2011 that I bought brand new in 2012. I'm running OS X Mavericks 10.9.4 and my MacBook has 500 GB of storage.
About a month or two ago I tried to download the new GarageBand (10.0.2) but I had trouble completing the loops download. The download would stop halfway through because of a network error. So last week I decided to try to download it again, and I was able to do so after reading some discussions about the issue. I successfully completed the download in safety mode and then I restarted my MacBook. At this point I was able to open GarageBand 10.0.2 and create a new project. Unfortunately, there was no audio coming through the output and sound bar for the various audio components in GarageBand. I had no audio when previewing the loops or playing it back in an audio track. I didn't really test anything else out because I figured I needed to fix this problem first. I have read many discussion boards about audio problems with GarageBand. I have already made sure everything is set properly in the GarageBand preferences and the audio preferences in system preferences. I've tried restarting GarageBand and restarting the computer.
This evening I found a discussion from the username icewhatice and they seemed to have had my exact problem. I'm not sure that I found the answer on this discussion though. For reference, this is what icewhatice posted: "I have no audio coming from Garageband 10.0.2. Downloaded it on Saturday and have spent the last two days trying to figure out why it won't work. I'm using a macbook pro with an Alesis QX49. GB registers keyboard when I plug it in but no sound whatsoever, not even from the onscreen keyboard. It seems to read the keyboard as if I play a C chord, it appears in the display. I've done all the obvious stuff like check preferences, restart, I've deleted and downloaded new GB several times and always with same result. Actually, it took me about four attempts to download it in the first place as I was getting an internet connection error message right at the end of the download, and I see others have had that problem. Managed to solve that by downloading in safe mode but now the no sound thing is driving me absolutely crazy because I can't play my keyboard!!!!! Also, worth noting that there is no audio level being read anywhere, I believe in the new version this appears in the volume control at the top. I've also looked into it potentially being a problem with my keyboard and it possibly needing an update but can't find any difinitive answer for that anywhere. I've stopped looking into that because the on screen keyboard doesn't even work - if that worked then I would know at least GB works and it's something to do with the keyboard. So, I am at a complete loss. If anyone has any ideas about why this is happening or what I could do to solve then I would be very grateful."
After reading this, I realized that I am unable to create new tracks, and I realized that I have the same problems with old projects saved from the last version of GarageBand I had. I have not tried to download GarageBand again since it did not work for icewhatice. léonie ended this post by saying: "Something is certainly wrong - either the current project, some settings in your user account, or the downloaded GarageBand version. Or incompatible software may be interfering. If a new project does not work, try to test by logging into a different user account, for example the "Guest User" account. Create a new project using this account. Does GarageBand work better from this account? Then we will need to troubleshoot your preferences."
I have tried this and started a new GarageBand project in the "Guest User" account. GarageBand was working fine in the "Guest User" account and all of the audio was working properly. Does anyone know how I should troubleshoot my preferences?

If an application is working in a different account, but not in your regular account,try t find out, what you configured differently in your own account, for example start-up items or preference panes you are using, applications and other helper tools, that are only installed for your regular account. As a first guess, remove GarageBands preference files from the user library in your Home folder.
But you will have to reset all settings you did in the GarageBand preferences dialog. And GarageBand will not remember the last project. You'll have to find the file manually.
Remove these files from your User Library to a folder on your Desktop:
~/Library/Containers/com.apple.garageband10/
~/Library/Preferences/com.apple.garageband.plist
~/Library/Caches/garageband
Quit GarageBand, then remove the files to a folder on the Desktop and restart the computer, before trying again to open GarageBand.
You user library may still be hidden, as is the default in Mavericks: To open your hidden user library:
Select the "Home" folder icon (the little house) in the Finder's sidebar and press the key combination ⌘J to open the "view options".
Enable "Show Library Folder".
Then open the Home folder and open the Library folder inside and navigate to the Preferences, Caches, or Containers folder. Remove these folders completely - don't leave anything inside: ~/Library/Containers/com.apple.garageband10/,
~/Library/Caches/garageband .

Why can I not disable the guest user in the 10.8.2 update? I have never enabled the guest user, but after the update, it was automatically enabled with a "managed" tag. It is not selectable even after entering my admin password to unlock the options.

Why can I not disable the guest user in the 10.8.2 update? I have never enabled the guest user, but after the update, it was automatically enabled with a "managed" tag. It is not selectable even after entering my admin password to unlock the options. I was able to select the account under "parental controls", but again, could not delete it. Why Apple? Why?!!????

SOLVED Ok. I actually was able to disable it. I had to actually log in as the guest user to make it accessible in the preference window. Then I disabled it and logged out. Apologies if this was obvious for some people, but I have had some sort of issue with something every update since Snow Leopard.

Guest user account logged into while away from house/computer!!!

Warning: I am not a tech-pro!
Okay, I have a 2011 Mac Book Pro running OS X LION 10.75 (11G63) unsure what those last numbers mean but they were there so I thought perhaps it might be helpful to add them.
Recently I moved into a granny flat and pay $10 a week to use their unlimited internet wifi. I log into my wifi through this device called a WiFi Repeater? It's plugged into the wall in my unit, as I warned I am not incredibly tech savvy so I am only guessing when I say I suppose this extends the main wifi signal from the actual home owners upstairs big modem? Any who.... A few times I have seen in the Finder Memu ot says 'Shared' and under that 'Wendys PC' (Wendy is the homeowner) then if you click on it it tries to connect but won't or there is a 'Connect As' option which brings up a little screen saying - connect as wendy, which requires a password or connect as guest which doesn't look like it requires a password- I'm not certain because I've never tried to connect any further, I only pressed that initial connect button when I had mentioned to Wendy I could see her PC & she asked me to press connect & prove I could not in fact connect (I'm starting to despise the word 'connect' since having to type this post about connection). So... We just kind of let it go. It did really worry me that Wendy (who worked in the tech field for years in particular with an Internet provider, could possibly connect to my computer and nosey through all my files- and to be honest, that would not actually suprise me. She is incredibly 'inquisitive'... And that's putting it mildly. I do have a password on my Mac Book Pro but I don't think that would be that hard to break through/hack if you have the knowledge/software. And yes, I do have confidential files on there! Banking/business/private photos (I'm trying to lose weight so take one nude photo per day to do a time lapse of myself in a year or two- obviously for myself not for others eyes lol and I would literally die in the *** if someone ever saw these). So basically I have good reason to protect my privacy. As does everyone! Anyway my first question is - Could she log in and how could I tell if she had? Now, the second part of this ridiculously long question (my apologies) is I was logged into my personal account all last night & this morning. As I stated- it IS password protected. The user account is not. Before I went out (and I can't actually recall if I closed the lid or not when I rushed out today... Usually I do but maybe I didnt... Whatevs) So, I get home and activate the screen by moving my finger on the touch pad and lo & behold I'm straight away looking at a totally different screen? It took me a few seconds to realise why my desktop looked completely different with none of my files etc... It was - as you've probably guessed- because I was in fact in the guest user account. Now, I didn't even have to click ON 'Guest User' as I normally have to. When you turn my Mac on it always comes up with - 'My Full Name' (one account login) and then 'Guest User' (the second account login option).... So you HAVE to choose which one you want! But my screen was straight away logged into the Guest Users desktop! I did NOT do this guys! So, of course now I'm extremely concerned that either she, her husband or their son whom is visiting for the weekend - have either a) logged in remotely on one of their computers or b) have come into my home and tried logging in & then forgot to log out of the guest account. I want to know if there is any way to find out what they did, what they opened if they did, how to stop it from both happening at all or if my suspicions are in fact happeninh AGAIN And I guess on a more personal, less tech involved note - how would you all deal with such a situation? Let it go? Or be upfront about the fears/concerns I am experiencing since moving in just over a month ago. AND most importantly - IS there any other reason -other than someone physically logging into my guest user account & failing/forgetting to log back out so that when I got home & activated my screen I was actually looking at the guest user desktop's account instead of the Mail application screen in the 'My Full Name' password protected user account where I had actually left it before rushing out.... Like, is there ANY other possibly explanation for my user account being logged into when I'd left it on my own account t before I left that doesn't include someone in the house hacking/breaking into/snooping through my Mac? Also- you should understand that when I leave my Mac for just a few minutes I have it set up so that the computer screen 'sleeps' (I'm assuming that's the correct term) so that if for instance -exactly like this morning- I have to rush out and don't want to/don't have time to save work/quit applications/shut down etc... I can walk away leaving the laptop as is knowing within a few minutes the screen saver comes up (and if that's ledr for long enough it goes into sleep mode) and no one can actually enter my private account without my password. I feel safe knowing that.
Sorry.... I FELT safe.
I'm truly sorry for how long-winded this question has become, I simply wanted to give anyone possibly willing to help me sort out this issue, as much information as possible. I think I have actually only posted here once before (I find these sort of forums quite intimidating) and I often see people getting bashed for not providing enough information. So, I'm pretty sure I'll get picked on for too many words if anything!!?! Lol
Thank you, in advance for your help!
Olivia;-).

Ouch.
Not easily. You could try data recovery software... maybe SubRosaSoft's File Salvage or the like.

Multiple guest users plus wierd behavior

Hello,
I'm having strange behavior in my afp logins - home folder house icon disappears, some users launch a file - it bounces and then it never launches, some share-points come up without mounting (only alias shows), sometimes a user takes 10 minutes to log-in, very long beachballs when opening a folder, etc. These behaviors are intermittent...
I see that in my AFP connections the following:
Name Status Address Connected Idle For
<Guest> Normal machine.name.private 04:57 00:15
<Guest> Normal machine.name.private 03:21 00:15
username Normal machine.name.private 00:15 00.00
The number of <Guest> users from the same machine varies. when I log out of the machine, the <Guest> users are still in the AFP list on the server as being logged in from that machine.
I don't know whether the behavior is related to the <Guest> issue or not, so I have the following questions: is the above status for APF normal? If not, how do I correct? If not, what else may be causing my unreliable behavior?
The server is 10.4.7 and the database is fully kerberized. Services running include: AFP DHCP, DNS, FTP, NFS, Open Directory, and Web.
Thanks,
Dave

I just noticed the same behavior on a client's new dual 2ghz G5 Xserve.
The AFP process spikes the CPU near 80% or so from time to time, though the server's not swapping out too much at all. It has 2 gb of RAM.
AFP looks like it hangs out at a reasonable load most of the time, but it does show a high number of threads in use. I tried setting the maxThreads key from 200 to 300 in /Library/Preferences/com.apple.AppleFileServer.plist. My client is going to restart AFP to see if that helps at all.
Regardless, what might cause the multiple authenticated/guest logins per IP? Has anyone else seen this?
Thanks for any tips you may have.

Wireless guest users are getting limited connectivity.

Could anyone help please, I have a wireless guest solution consist of :
WLC located internal in the network – all the AP are associated with that WLC-.
Anchor WLC located in the DMZ . the guest SSID are tunneled from the internal WLC to the Anchor WLC, the DHCP service for guest users is on the Anchor WLC.
NAC guest server to authenticate the guest users.
The solution was working properly but now we have a problem that if any one tried to connect to the guest SSID if he is authorized or not , the user will get IP address from the DHCP pool and now as you know most of people has smart phones and they try to get internet access. Now only 5 or 6 people authenticated with NAC gest server and the DHCP pool become full because too many people tried to connect even they do not authenticate.
so if any user trys to cnnect he will not get IP address from the anchor controller and getting limited connectivity.
if I add static IP address on my Laptop , I will be redirected to the authentication page and can access normally.
I am working in big environment 7,000 users so I can’t go with increasing the DHCP pool because the problem will not be solved.
I hope if anyone can help in this case.
Thanks in advance.

This is a pitfall and raising the eyebrows.. currently we do not have anyother option other than using a WPA-PSK + WEB AUTH
that is..
PSK will block the users to just grab an IP and sit!! , if the user enters a valid PSK, he will get the IP address and followed by the Web auth process!! this may help u as of now.. or just a work around.. to overcome the IP exhaustion..
Please rasie a PER with your accounts team to raise the severity on this issue if u have the contract n all with us!!
Please dont forget to rate the usefull posts!!
Regards
Surendra

Guest user available after lion 10.7.2 update

I yesterday installed the 10.7.2 update.
I now find that on the login screen I have a guest account that wasn't there (and which I don't want). Also the picture of my user was changed.
I fixed the picture in the address book (was also changed) and on the user page in system prefs.
Also I verified that the guest account is disabled in the system prefs! BUT it still shows in the login screen.
How can I fix this?

So is this a find my Mac issue then? It's one of the new adds this latest update brought (along with the iCloud).
I thought maybe it was iCloud related...
Anyway.....very annoying.
I want the services (find my Mac, iCloud and so on) but I don't want to see the guest on my login screen. And it is disabled in SysPrefs so there is no way to remove it even if you do manage to login to your Mac.
I wish someone from Apple would at least explain to us why the Guest user is now there?
So bumping this discussion to see if more answers come up....
thx for the Find My Mac as probable cause tip.

Cisco WLC 5508 with 3702APs - mobile hotspot for 2000 Guest users

Cisco WLC 5508 with 3702APs - mobile hotspot for 2000 Guest users
I've been given a fantastic "opportunity" by my boss to use our existing wireless infrastructure to provide internet access to potentially upto 2000 VIP guests arriving with BYOD devices, in a very densely populated area for a 3 day event. We are talking an area of approx 200m x 15m. Think of it as an awards ceremony/concert. The solution will also be mobile so we will be using internet breakout from different telcos as it will move to approx 20 countries. The area is also incredibly densely populated with other wifi APs. I did a brief site survey and AirMagnet could detect over 2500 other 'rogue' APs from where I was stood! I hope CleanAir works!
We need a simple authentication method for them to connect with zero admin from our side. We don't want to just offer up a rolling daily PSK as that's a bit amateur and we don't really want the VIP guests sharing the PSK with others during their stay. Ideally they could self-provision by providing an email address.
I know the WLC can handle webauth for local users but I don't think it scales very well. ie I don't think I can offer the account to several hundred people.
Cisco ISE looks a very expansive (and expensive) product but I don't think we need all it's capabilities (do I?). It would be nice to just ask a potential user for their email address and grant them access and email them next year. I've seen Cisco NAC but that looks over the top too for just guest users who will only be accessing a shared internet connection.
I've seen 3rd party supposed software solutions from Kiosk Antamedia etc do they work with Cisco Enterprise WLC solutions?
We'd like to limit users to a certain (low) bandwidth and block (say) torrent traffic to keep the general user experience worthwhile.
Does anybody have any case study documents or experience of such a project? As well as the authentication it's how well the APs will handle the dense potential number of clients trying to connect in such a confined space.
Any suggestions would be gratefully appreciated from the knowledgeable community.
Cheers,
Mike

Hi Rasika,
We are having WLC 5508 model with software version running 7.4.121.0. AP Models are AIR-CAP2602I.
Normally our WAN links are good even while the issue pertains. We are connected to remote offices over ipsec site to site vpn for WAN. The link latency in WLC between the AP and the controller shows <1ms.
currently the Guest network is using WPA2-PSK auth given in the controller. we are trying to find a option to make the Guest wireless auth local to the office, and see if this solves the problem.
any suggestions,
Thank you,
Arjun

Allowing Airwatch MDM access to the Captive-Portal guest users in pre-auth role for android and BB?

Requirement:
How to allow Airwatch MDM access to the Captive-Portal guest users in pre-authentication role for Android and Blackberry devices?
What is Airwatch MDM?
Airwatch MDM is Mobile Device Management. The Airwatch is an enterprise which helps to manage and secure data traveling through the mobile devices like Laptops, Tablets, Android, iPhones, iPads etc.
Solution:
Why we need to allow access to Airwatch MDM?
The network administrator can force the guest users to register to Airwatch MDM before they get authenticated and access the internet. So that the network administrator could manage the guest devices through Airwatch Management tool. This can be achieved by CPPM server. To download the Airwatch MDM app and register with the Airwatch MDM server certain domains should be permitted in the captive portal pre-authentication role. This KB provides the configuration steps to allow the guest users to download the Airwatch MDM app and register with the Airwatch MDM server.
Configuration:
Below is the configuration
Configuration steps:
1. Create the following netdestinations
netdestination Airwatch
name *.awagent.com
name *.awmdm.com
name air-watch.com
netdestination Google-Play
name android.clients.google.com
name .ggpht.com
name gstatic.com
name accounts.google.com
name clients1.google.com
name clients2.google.com
name clients3.google.com
name clients4.google.com
name i.ytimg.com
name google-analytics.com
name .1e100.net
name android.l.google.com
name mtalk.google.com
name clients.l.google.com
name googleapis.com
name gvt1.com
netdestination BlackBerry
name *.blackberry.com
2. Now define the rules in the session acl and map it to the pre-authentication Role of the captive portal.
ip access-list session Airwatch_Access
any   alias Airwatch svc-http permit
any   alias Airwatch svc-https permit
ip access-list session Google-Play-Store
               any   alias Google-Play any permit
ip access-list session BlackBerry-Access
               any   alias BlackBerry any permit
3. Now map the session ACLs to captive-portal pre-authentication Role as follows
user-role Guest-Pre-Auth-Role
access-list session Airwatch_Access
access-list session Google-Play-Store
access-list session BlackBerry-Access
access-list session logon-control
access-list session captiveportal
4. Now whitelist the list of domain names in the Captive Portal profle
aaa authentication captive-portal Airwatch-Captive-Portal-Profile
white-list Airwatch
white-list Google-Play                                                                                ------------>Netdestinations where you defined the Domains.
white-list BlackBerry
Verification
Now the user will be placed under the "Guest-Pre-Auth-Role" before the authentication. The user can now go the Google Play-Store or BlackBerry Appworld to download the Airwatch MDM and register to Airwatch Management Server.

Thanks so much getting these names listed out. I have been working on this very issue for a few weeks and was basing my firewall rules on IP's. It was not going well. Now access is working and testing can commence!  Thanks,Chris

Guest users in Portal Activity Report

Hi All,
We have implemented Portal Activity Report in our portal. We are tracking only the pages and we have set the property Authentication Scheme to default for all the pages.
The reports are working fine except for the fact that the reports are showing up large number of anonymous users logging in as Guest for e.g. Guest 1, Guest 2, Guest 3 etc. Our landscape has no Anonymous users.
Can anyone tell me why the report is showing up large number of Guest users (Type - Anonymous Users) though we donu2019t have any anonymous Users?
How to get rid of these Anonymous Guest users in the Portal Activity Report?
Kindly help me to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Adren D'Souza

Hi Adren,
The AR shows what it gets.
The first posibility, is somewhere anonymous users do have access to content or some operations are being considered as anonymous.
I suggest to check all the properties which should disable the anonymous, whether there is any content which is exposed as anonymous:
1)Search the roles which are assigned to Guest user.
2)Make sure that the "Guest" user is disabled.
The second possibility u2013 there is an old data in DB tables.
What type of report are we discussing? Is this the "Details about the users who logged on" report?
If it is, check the WCR_* DB tables whether there any u2018au2019 type users.
If there is, I would recommend you to delete those entries ("WHERE USERTYPE = 'a'), it could be the old data, before you have applied the note.
Best Regards,
Victoria Gur
| Installed Base Development Engineer
| NetWeaver Portal Platform
| SAP Labs Israel

Guest users in EP.

Hello friends,
I have EP 7.0 SP13. Whenever I restart J2EE engine, I see guest users gets logged in on each server node.Could you please provide me with details what this guest users? How can I prevent guest users from loggin into all the nodes.
Thanks
Suman

Hi,
Dear friend guest users are critical for restart. This is no unique situation and you can be happy with this.
The system uses guest user to do basic restart. I dont see any security issues. If you disable guest user , your Portal will not start up.

WCS 4.1.91 Guest User creation error

When I try to add a guest user using my LobbyAmbassador operator account, I consistently get an error stating "End date can not be older than start date".
The user is a limited life time, and we are trying to set end time using calendar, setting life to 48 hours basically. Just this week I upgraded to WCS4.1.91 and WLC4400's wo 4.1.185.0.
Thanks in advance for your help.

Hi Darcy,
It looks like you are hitting this bug;
CSCsi79726 Bug
Creating scheduled user - message confusing -end date
Symptom:Cannot create scheduled guest users with the lobby ambassador because of error "the end date cannot be older than the start date"
Conditions:version 4.1.83.0
Workaround:Upgrade to version 4.1.91.0
Further Problem Description:The creation is failing because
of the difference between the server and the client times. Initially user UI's
are populated by considering server times and user selections are evaluated
against client timings. The lifetime calculated is invalid because of
difference between client and the server timings.
It looks like WCS 4.1.91 was supposed to fix this issue, so if it is still happening you should really open a TAC case :(
Hope this helps!
Rob

Guest users issue??

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for