Handle exception and finish procedure

Hi everybody,
I have a Store Procedure and I have some exceptions handling but when my procedure catches an exception, it finish abruptly. Is there a way to catch the exceptions and let the procedure continue with the next part until the very end of the procedure? (if there are many exceptions handle them but never finish the procedure abruptly)
Thanks for any advice you can give,
Federico

This is the forum for SQL Developer (Not for general SQL/PLSQL questions), your question would be better asked in the SQL and PL/SQL forum.
You may be catching the exceptions, but you are not handling them if your procedure terminates.
begin
-- some query
exception
-- handle no_data_found
when no_data_found then
    nodata:=true;
-- don't handle anything else
   when others then
     raise;
end;
-- more code

Similar Messages

How to handle exceptions / errors in LiveCycle

Hello All ,
I want to handle some exception / errors that may arise while the user is filling the form so that the JavaScript console should not show any error rather we can simply show an alert / message .
Say I got a dynamic table where the user can add / delete row at run time . There is a minimum count for the no.of rows . Suppose the user clicks the delete button without adding a new row then the JavaScript console will show error . I know we can handle this by using if else statements where depending on the instance manager count the deletion of rows are permitted . I want to know is it possible here to write a code to handle exception considering this thing as an exception without using the If-else statement ?? Just a thought.
Thanks.
Bibhu.

What you're looking for is the javascript:
try{
// code
} catch (err) {
// fail code
However, this is not the right way to solve your problem: Exception handling is for handling exceptions, and a scenario that you know can come to pass (such as the user clicking the removeInstance button when there are none to remove) is not an exception.
Don't misunderstand me - putting code inside try/catch is 'good developer manners' (I do it myself all the time), and I strongly encourage you to do the same. Although only for handling exception sprung from code that you think should work just as fine without them.
A better way of solving your particular problem is to remove the minus-button if there are no instances to remove.

OWB Mapping handle Exception

Hi folks,
Is There a way to handle exeption of a OWB 11r2 mapping in SQLPLUS shell?
I need run few mapping in sqlplus script, but I need that if the mapping faild for any reason mapping must handle exceptoin, and exit from sqlplus.
Now if a mapping faild, it dosen't handle exception and the next mapping start..... this is a problem for me...
thanks
Emilio

Hi Thomas,
thanks for reply, but I just do it...... but this workaround it's not very good for me.......
I wrote this script:
qlplus -s $1 << EOF
VARIABLE p_status VARCHAR2(100);
whenever sqlerror exit 1;
ALTER SESSION SET NLS_NUMERIC_CHARACTERS = '. ' ;
set timing on;
declare
begin
MAP_FACT_INTERVENTO.MAIN(:p_status);
if :p_status <> 'OK' then
raise INVALID_NUMBER;
end if;
MAP_FACT_INTERVENTO_P2.MAIN(:p_status);
if :p_status <> 'OK' then
raise INVALID_NUMBER;
end if;
I raise a generec INVALID_NUMBER exception when p_status is <> 'OK', Is there a way to raise the real exception!?!?
thanks
Emilio

RAISING EXCEPTION AND SHOWING TO USERS IN FORM BASED ON STORED PROCEDURE

I have a form based on stored procedure.
I want to handle exceptions in the stored procedure and show it to users.
Here is what i want to do.
I have a sku# field in the form and i want to validate it(against the database
table) in the procedure before inserting into the database.
I want to give a message to users when the validation fails.
How is this possible with the forms based on stored procedure?
Can i use javascript to do the same?
Thanks in Advance

I have a form based on stored procedure.
I want to handle exceptions in the stored procedure and show it to users.
Here is what i want to do.
I have a sku# field in the form and i want to validate it(against the database
table) in the procedure before inserting into the database.
I want to give a message to users when the validation fails.
How is this possible with the forms based on stored procedure?
Can i use javascript to do the same?
Thanks in Advance

Exception Handling Standards -The exception Exception should never been thrown. Always Subclass Exception and throw the subclassed Classes.

In the current project my exception handling implementation is as follows :
Exception Handling Layer wise :
DL layer :
catch (Exception ex)
bool rethrow = ExceptionPolicy.HandleException(ex, "Ui Policy");
if (rethrow)
throw;
BL Layer
catch (Exception ex)
bool rethrow = ExceptionPolicy.HandleException(ex, "Ui Policy");
if (rethrow)
throw;
UI Layer
catch (Exception ex)
bool rethrow = ExceptionPolicy.HandleException(ex, "Ui Policy");
if (rethrow)
Response.Redirect("ErrorPage.aspx", false);
We have a tool to check the standards. And tool output is as follows :
The exception Exception should never been thrown. Always Subclass Exception and throw the subclassed Classes.
I need suggestions on how to implement the same according to standards.

Your tool is wrong if it says to never throw Exception. This was a common recommendation back in the .NET v1 days but has long since been thrown out. It is perfectly fine to use Exception when you have a general exception that provides no information
that an application can use to make an informed opinion.
The general rules of exception throwing is to throw the most specific exception that makes sense. If there is no specific exception that applies and it would be useful for the caller to handle the exception differently than other exceptions then creating
a custom exception type is warranted. Otherwise throwing Exception is reasonable. As an example you might have an application that pulls back product data given an ID. There is no built in exception that says the ID is invalid. However an invalid ID
is something that an application may want to handle differently than, say, an exception about the product being discontinued. Therefore it might make sense to create an ItemNotFoundException exception that the application can react to.
Conversely there is no benefit in having different exception types for disk full and disk quota met. The application will respond the same in either case.
Michael Taylor
http://blogs.msmvps.com/p3net

4 Types of exception and the code to handle them

Dear all,
I would like to know wheter runtime exception, errors exception, unchecked exception and checked exception are classified as the 4 types of exception.
What are the java coding of them? please help.

There are two main families of exception in Java: checked and unchecked.
The base class for all exceptions is Throwable. Java provides Exception and Error that extend Throwable. RuntimeException (and many others) extend Exception.
RuntimeException and its descendants, and Error and its descendants, are called unchecked exceptions. Everything else is a checked exception.
If your method, or any method it calls, can throw a checked exception, then your method must either catch that exception, or declare that your method throws that exception. This way, when I call your method, I know at compile time what can possibly go wrong and I can decide whether to handle it or just bubble it up to my caller. Catching a given exception also catches all that exception's descendants. Declaring that you throw a given exception means that you might throw that exception or any of its descendants.
Unchecked exceptions (RuntimeException, Error, and their descendants) are not subject to those restrictions. Any method can throw any unchecked exception at any time without declaring it. This is because unchecked exceptions are either the sign of a coding error (RuntimeException), which is totally preventable and should be fixed rather than handled by the code that encounters it, or a problem in the VM, which in general can not be predicted or handled.
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/essential/exceptions/index.html

Do SQL pros write seperate stored procedures to handle Save and update operations?

hi friends,
Currently i'm bit confused with the industry standard of writing store procedures for save and update operations. I have sees people write separate stored procedure to handle save and update operations even they have to write complex queries. Also I have
seen people writing one store procedure to handle both Save and Update operations even when the queries are complicated. when I asked them why they do it, they said why should waste time on writing another query to update instead write one save store procedure
to handle all.
In here there are SQL Pros, Gurus, what would say about this?
what is the actual industry standard with stored procedure to perform save and update operations, do you write separate ones or do both in one?
thanks
I use Visual studio 2012 Ultimate and SQL server 2008 developer edition!

>what is the actual industry standard with stored procedure to perform save and update operations
There is no industry standard. Guideline though you want to be happy with the sp-s; same for your peers.
As noted above the MERGE command is like a Swiss Army knife; it can perform INSERT, UPDATE & DELETE
in one (huge) statement.
Make sure you pick good names for the sp-s, document the parameters and comment the logic if any.
Format the stored procedure for readability:
http://www.sqlusa.com/sqlformat/
Kalman Toth Database & OLAP Architect
SELECT Query Video Tutorial 4 Hours
New Book / Kindle: Exam 70-461 Bootcamp: Querying Microsoft SQL Server 2012

Can we handle exceptions for the expressions in select query?

Hi all,
Can we handle exceptions for the expressions in select query.
I created a view, there I am extracting a substring from a character data and expected that as a number.
For example consider the following query.
SQL> select to_number( substr('r01',2,2) ) from dual;
TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR('R01',2,2))
1
Here we got the value as "1".
Consider the following query.
SQL> select to_number( substr('rr1',2,2) ) from dual;
select to_number( substr('rr1',2,2) ) from dual
ORA-01722: invalid number
For this I got error. Because the substr returns "r1" which is expected to be as number. So it returns "Invalid number".
So, without using procedures or functions can we handle these type of exceptions?
I am using Oracle 10 G.
Thanks in advance.
Thank you,
Regards,
Gowtham Sen.

SQL> select decode(ltrim(rtrim(translate(substr('r21', 2, 2), '0123456789', ' ' ), ' '), ' '), null, (substr('r21', 2, 2)), null) from dual;
DE
21
SQL> ed a
SQL> select decode(ltrim(rtrim(translate(substr('rr1', 2, 2), '0123456789', ' ' ), ' '), ' '), null, (substr('rr1', 2, 2)), null) from dual;
D
-

Handling log messages in procedure

Hi All,
Which is the best way to handle log messages in procedures or packages.When I run a procedure it is taking long time and getting cunfuse it is running or not.Please let me know how to handle log messages other than dbms_ouput and inserting values to log table.
Thanks & Regards,
Rajasekhar

It really depends on what you want.
If you want to see what stage of a procedure you are at, then DBMS_application_info is the way to go.
You set the name and text in the package and the current state seT can be seen in v$SESSION
Of course it helps if you remember to set it to finished before it ends.
The other alternative I like is to have an autonomous procedure which logs the steps.
You just pass a call to the procedure.
The benefit of this is that the commits are effectively in another session, so won't affect your existing procedure.
You can also code this in such a way that it is off by default but you can turn it on eg by changing a value in a db column.
If I did this, I would have it so that each individual procedure/function within a package could be turned on as necessary.
This means that you can turn your tracing on just for a specific problem even for a production system without affecting the vast majority of users.
Edited by: Keith Jamieson on Jan 6, 2009 11:10 AM
FIXED TYPO:

Exceptions in stored procedure

Hello,
Consider a situation where a java class is executing a PL/SQL stored procedure. What happens if an error occurs in a stored procedure. Its obvious that the error is converted into SQLException in Java, and this is taken care of JDBC drivers.
Is there a case where any kind of exception is not converted into SQLException or is ignored by the JDBC driver? and..
Is it a good practice to handle Exceptions both in PL/SQL stored procedures and in Java?
or
Is it enough to handle just in Java?
Thanks
-Rao

Thanks damorgan,
I understand how exceptions work, but my question is specifially about how exception has to be defined when there are 2 "begins" in the procedure and the exception is caught in the internal begin. to elaborate of What I am tring to say, consider this
procedure finderror is
BEGIN
no_emp_found EXCEPTION;
begin
(SOME SELECT STATEMENT)
WHEN NO_DATA_FOUND THEN
RAISE no_emp_found
end;
EXCEPTION
WHEN no_emp_found
dbms.putline ('CAUGHT IT')
end finderror;
will the above code work, I mean conceptually (ignore the syntax). Or do I have to define the following part inside the internal (begin...end)
EXCEPTION
WHEN no_emp_found
dbms.putline ('CAUGHT IT')
Thanks

FRM-40735: Do_Proc trigger raised un-handled exception ORA-06502

Hi Guys
i'm trying to upload a csv file and i'm getting this error.I have checked the Do_Proc1 trigger and i couldn't find the source of the problem
pls help!

It must be because of the following reasons:
1, Expecting a numeric value but got string
2. Value coming into the field is too large than the datatype can accomodate.
Modify the do_proc procedure and catch the exception and find the value which causes the error. Then it would be easier to handle.

Consuming a web service in ABAP exception and error

Hi experts,
I have succesfully implemented this example web service http://www.webservicex.net/airport.asmx?WSDL from http://www.webservicex.net/airport.asmx and everything works perfect so I know it is possible.
But my requirement is to implement the following web service: http://ws1.webservices.nl/business/soap_doclit?wsdl it is a document/literal soap web service and WS-I Basic Profile 1.0 compliant. When I try to create a proxy object I get the following errors:
- Exception occurred in library handler
- Incorrect value: Unknown Namespace http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl
I already found that library handler exception might have something to do with http bindings, I found note 1403271 but as my system is running on release 702 level 0008 this note is obsolete.
Now 2nd error, incorrect value I don't really understand.. I also think the web service is SOAP 1.1 and not 1.2 because that should also give problems according to this topic: Proxy object to consume web service - can anyone verify to be sure? I'm not that familiar with WSDL files but does anyone know what I can test and what I can remove from the web service?
The web service documentation is found here: https://webview.webservices.nl/documentation/files/interfaces/soap/soap-txt.html#SOAP_Interface.Differences_between_SOAP_interfaces
There are also other versions such as RPC/Encoded and one without a header but ALL versions give the exact same error.
Thx!

check the beginning of your WSDL file
just after the first line <xml> you should have
<wsdl:definitions xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"
followed by the namespaces related to your web service if required.
SAP does all the job (generate the web service client) but any very little error in the file (or element not recognized) leads to this message "exception occurred in library handler" and it is not easy to know exactly what is the error...

Handling exception logging in a Java task scheduler program?

I need to design a Task Scheduler Where
1) User should be able to schedule multiple task at the same time.
2) There should be proper error handling on failure of any task and should not affect the other running tasks.
I found the related programme at http://www.roseindia.net/java/example/java/util/CertainAndRepeatTime.shtml
My concern is about handling of point 2 in program provided at above link. Say I schedule a recurring mail send process in above program which will be run first time on 12 september 2011 at 2 am, and will be repeated after every 2 hours Say a one process fais at 8 am. I want to log it in log file with task name and time details. Now if I look at above programme i.e CertainAndRepeatTime.java. This program will exit once it schedules all the tasks. Where and how should handle the logging?
Posted at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7377204/handling-exception-logging-in-a-java-task-scheduler-program but folks suggesting Quartz scheduler . My Limitation is that i can't for quartz because my project allows me to use only standard java library. Is there any way we can handle logging in the same programme in case of exception.

Well, first of all I wouldn't trust any code from roseindia. So you might want to look for more reliable advice.
As for your logging, you can add it for example to the TimerTask itself. I don't recommend adding logging to that roseindia cr*p though.

How to handle exceptions in a Service

Hi,
I'm trying to get the new Service (background thread) stuff working and am close but I have a problem with handling exceptions that are thrown in my Task. Below is my code, does anyone know if I am doing something wrong, or is this just a flaw in the system at the moment:
Here is my service:
public class TestService extends Service<String>
    protected Task<String> createTask()
        return new Task<String>()
            protected String call() throws Exception
               System.out.println("About to throw exception from inside task");
               throw new Exception("Test failure");
}Here is my code using this service:
public void doTest()
    final TestService test = new TestService();
    test.stateProperty().addListener(new ChangeListener<Worker.State>()
        public void changed(ObservableValue<? extends Worker.State> source, Worker.State oldValue, Worker.State newValue)
            System.out.println("State changed from " + oldValue + " to " + newValue);
    test.start();
}When the task throws its exception I was hoping to get a state change to FAILED but the callback is never triggered. I've tried listening for invalidation of the state and also tried listening to all the other properties on Service (running, progress, exception, etc). There doesn't seem to be any feedback after the exception has been thrown.
Am I using this wrong, or is it a bug?
Cheers for you help,
zonski

Hi,
This was working in the build #32. I updated the JavaFX to build #36 and it stopped working.
I checked in the latest build #37 as well which was released last week and this doesn't work here as well.
If the task is succeeding the state is getting changed to SUCCEEDED but in case of an exception there is no change in the state
Edited by: user12995677 on Aug 3, 2011 2:07 AM

How can I handle exception? - to give user more friendly notification

Hi!
User gets an error:
'Error in mru internal routine: ORA-20001: Error in MRU: row= 1, ORA-20001: ORA-20001: Current version of data in database has changed since user initiated update process. current checksum =...'
How can I handle this exception (when two users want to modify the same set of data at the same time)? I would like to hide the above error message and give user more friendly notification.
Thanks in advance,
Tom

Thanks Vikas for your answer.
These workarounds are really creative and I want to use one of them. BUT my problem is to 'catch' the exception/error when two users want to modify the same set of data at the same time.
Those solutions which we can read about in this link you gave me describe handling exceptions in pl/sql processes. How can I catch the error I am talking about in pl/sql code?
Code would be like this:
DECLARE
two_users EXCEPTION;
BEGIN
IF --catch the error
THEN RAISE two_users;
END IF;
EXCEPTION WHEN two_users
THEN :HIDDEN_ITEM := 'Error Message';
END;
What should I put in a place where there is '--catch the error' ??
Thanks in advance,
Tom

Handle exception and finish procedure

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for