Handling "combined" identifying relationships from same root entity

I'm using ODM to do some documentation of our application, and running into difficulties handling this scenario:
E3 has relationship from E2 which has identifying relationship from E1, and which also has another attribute include in its key.
E3 also has an identifying relationship from E1.
See attached.
As I'm not really doing anything with this other than documentation, I'm OK with just hiding the "SCHEDULER_ID1" attribute that comes from the JOB --> EXECUTED_JOB relationship.  I can do this in the UI, and it looks fine.  However, as soon as I re-open the model, its hidden state does not stick.
Is there a configuration, or any workaround that anyone knows of?

Hi,
thanks for reporting the problem and for provided example. I logged  bugs for reappearing hidden FK attribute and for generated wrong name for PK identifier (in provided design).
Philip

Similar Messages

  • Combine 2 Queries (from SAME table) into a SINGLE query

    I have this two queries (from SAME table), and want to combine into one SINGLE query, how?
    How can we use CASE WHEN THEN for such situation? 
    Query1:
    SELECT t_inner.*,
    Floor(t_inner.ProductiveTime/ 3600) || 'hr:' || LPAD(Floor(Mod(t_inner.ProductiveTime,3600) / 60),2,0) || 'min:' AS Productive_Time,
    Floor(t_inner.OperatorDownTime/ 3600) || 'hr:' || LPAD(Floor(Mod(t_inner.OperatorDownTime,3600) / 60),2,0) || 'min:' AS OperatorDown_Time
    FROM
    (SELECT SYSTEMTYPE,
    sum(TIME_TEST + TIME_STEP) AS ProductiveTime,
    sum(TIME_IDLE) AS OperatorDownTime
    FROM PFODS.PPL_TESTSYSTEMS_UTILISATION
    WHERE (SYSTEMTYPE = '0005-072')
    AND (TS_START >= to_date('13/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY'))
    AND TS_End <= to_date('17/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY') + 1 + (1/1440) +(59/86400)
    AND MONO != '9999999999'
    GROUP BY SYSTEMTYPE ) t_inner
    Query 2:
    SELECT t_inner.*,
    Floor(t_inner.MachineDownTime/ 3600) || 'hr ' || LPAD(Floor(Mod(t_inner.MachineDownTime,3600) / 60),2,0) || 'min' AS MachineDown_Time
    FROM
    (SELECT SYSTEMTYPE,
    sum(TIME_IDLE) AS MachineDownTime
    FROM PFODS.PPL_TESTSYSTEMS_UTILISATION
    WHERE (SYSTEMTYPE = '0005-072')
    AND (TS_START >= to_date('13/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY'))
    AND TS_End <= to_date('17/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY') + 1 + (1/1440) +(59/86400)
    AND MONO = '9999999999'
    GROUP BY SYSTEMTYPE) t_inner
    see http://postimg.org/image/koq87iyyz/  and
    http://postimg.org/image/fv3zxa38n

    with the first query, 
    SELECT t_inner.*,
    Floor(t_inner.ProductiveTime/ 3600) || 'hr:' || LPAD(Floor(Mod(t_inner.ProductiveTime,3600) / 60),2,0) || 'min' AS Productive_Time
    FROM
    (SELECT SYSTEMTYPE,
    --sum(TIME_TEST) AS TIME_TEST,
    --sum(TIME_SYSTEM) AS TIME_SYSTEM,
    --sum(TIME_STEP) AS TIME_STEP,
    --sum(TIME_IDLE) AS TIME_IDLE,
    sum(TIME_TEST + TIME_STEP) AS ProductiveTime
    FROM PFODS.PPL_TESTSYSTEMS_UTILISATION
    WHERE (SYSTEMTYPE = '0005-072')
    AND (TS_START >= to_date('13/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY'))
    AND TS_End <= to_date('17/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY') + 1 + (1/1440) +(59/86400)
    AND MONO != '9999999999'
    GROUP BY SYSTEMTYPE) t_inner
    it gives output as from 
    http://postimg.org/image/koq87iyyz/
    with the second query,
    SELECT t_inner.*,
    Floor(t_inner.MachineDownTime/ 3600) || 'hr ' || LPAD(Floor(Mod(t_inner.MachineDownTime,3600) / 60),2,0) || 'min' AS MachineDown_Time
    FROM
    (SELECT SYSTEMTYPE,
    sum(TIME_IDLE) AS MachineDownTime
    FROM PFODS.PPL_TESTSYSTEMS_UTILISATION
    WHERE (SYSTEMTYPE = '0005-072')
    AND (TS_START >= to_date('13/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY'))
    AND TS_End <= to_date('17/01/2014', 'DD/MM/YYYY') + 1 + (1/1440) +(59/86400)
    AND MONO = '9999999999'
    GROUP BY SYSTEMTYPE) t_inner
    it gives output as from 
    http://postimg.org/image/fv3zxa38n/
    I want to come those 2 queries into a single query, such that it gives both outputs as above. Let me know if you need any other information. thanks.

  • How to handle an update of the same record from two different user JSP

    how do you handle an update of the same record from two different users in JSP... if one person updates the record from one drop downs should be updated as well.. is the possible.

    I'm not sure whether I understand your question. If one user changes a record then you would like other users to see those changes. Normally those changes will be visible to other users when they refresh their browser, after the first user has committed changes to the record. I you want to be sure that the same row isn't updated at the same time by to different user, you need to configure some locking (pessimistic locking) - this depends of what technology you use. In EJB3 pessimistic locking is performed by adding a version to every entity object. If you are using ADF, the framework is able to handle either pessimistic or even optimistic locking.
    If you want the changed row to be updated in other users browsers without any user interaction by these users, you should take a look at Reverse Ajax (ex. DWR http://ajaxian.com/archives/reverse-ajax-with-dwr) - or Ajax in general. But you will never get a realtime solution, where changes is visible in other users browsers right after each record update.

  • JPA: trouble removing a 1:M cascade ALL relationship from entity

    I have an entity A, with a OneToMany relationship to entity B, and cascade set to ALL.  Entity B has a ManyToOne relationship to A.  In my scenario I create a new instance of B to a detached instance of A, and I add it to the 1:M of A and set the M:1 on B.
    Then I'd like to merge the changes on A using EntityManager.merge(A).  However, before I do that I need to remove a different (old) instance of B from A, and then merge my changes so that my new instance of B is persisted.
    I've tried a couple different scenarios and get different results (none favorable):
    1.  First lookup the instance of B I want to remove via EntityManager.find(id), and then call EM.remove(B).  And then I call EM.merge(A) on the instance of A with my new B.  I get the following IllegalArgumentException during the merge:
    java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Cannot fulfill merge operation: Relationship >>outputElementInstances<< of the target entity {com.sap.eventus.wire.entity.EvtWireInstance(id=85e83543-45d1-49cd-bb90-8688699ca0d4)} has been modified
    The relationship it's talking about is actually a different (but related) one that was affected when the old instance of B was removed.  It seems reasonable that JPA has determined that my instance of A with the new B is no longer in sync with the database and is complaining that a relationship has been changed.
    Any ways around that?
    2. I also tried simply removing B from A's 1:M, and setting B's M:1 to null, and then merging in hopes that would trigger a delete on the old B.  However the old B is not removed.
    I was expecting this to trigger a delete, however, I realize that there are other relationships from B to other objects (such as a 1:M cascade ALL) that I did not remove which I suspect might cause JPA to not delete the old B.  Is this true?
    3. And finally I tried 1 & 2 together, first calling EM.remove(old B), and then removing the old B from A and then merging, which yields the following IllegalStateException:
    java.lang.IllegalStateException: Relationship >>wireInstance<< of entity {com.sap.eventus.wire.entity.EvtElementInstance(id=08ca6253-1385-45dd-9173-978ee298b55f)} contains the new entity {com.sap.eventus.wire.entity.EvtWireInstance(id=c9fbd4e7-5575-4cc9-9b7d-2a8549c43574)}
    Which is another different (but related) relationship off of object B.
    Basically, after all this, my question is: what is the correct way to remove a 1:M relationship and add a new one?  Simple enough, however I do not want to remove the old 1:M, re-query to get the new updated parent object and then add the new 1:M, as it's a fairly involved in creating and adding the new 1:M and it must be done BEFORE removing the old 1:M.
    Thanks!

    Hi Derek,
    I understand your task as follows:
    You are having three entities A, B_old and B_new. Within one transaction you want to do the following:
    - remove B_old from the database
    - remove B_old from the 1:n relationship A.bs
    - persist the B_new
    - add B_new to the 1:n relationship A.bs
    - set the n:1 relationship B_new.a to refer to A
    well, I suggest that you do this without a merge:
    - em.remove(B_old)  // you have to do this explicitly as JPA 1 does not have automatic orphan removal
    - A.bs.remove(B_old)
    - em.persist(B_new) // also, you have to make sure that the entities related to B_new are managed upon commit
    - A.bs.add(B_new)
    - B_new.a = A
    I hope this works.
    Regarding your observations:
    1. The error message is not self-explaining. We have got to improve it ;-).
    2. You have to remove the B_old explicitly as JPA 1 does not have automatic orphan removal. 
    3. This message should be self-explaining. Maybe there is one of the relationships EvtOutputElementInstance.wireInstance or EvtInputElementInstance.wireInstance still referring B_new. You'll surely find out.
    Regards,
    Adrian

  • How to handle an update of the same record from two different user  in JSP

    how to handle an update of the same record from two different user
    how do you handle an update of the same record from two different users in JSP... if one person updates the record from one drop downs should be updated as well.. is the possible.

    Usually, if two users try to update the same row at the same time, you want the first to commit to succeed, and when the second commits, they should fail with the error that the row was being concurrently updated. They you may want to show them the new row values and give them the opportunity to merge their values with the new row values...
    How can you achieve this? Google optimistic locking.

  • How to join two parallel identifying relationships?

    I have four entities A, B, C and D with the following identifying relationships:
    A <-- B
    A <-- C
    B <-- D
    C <-- D
    A has a single primary key AID. B and C have their own primary keys BID and CID and primary foreign keys to the primary key of A. So the primary keys of B and C are (BID, AID) and (CID, AID). D has his own primary key DID and the primary foreign keys to B and C. So the primary key of D is (DID, (BID, AID), (CID, AID)). As you can see the primary key of A occurs twice in the primary key of D, because of the two parallel identifying relationships.
    Now I want the two AIDs in the primary key of D to be identical. The primary key of D should be a four tuple (DID, BID, CID, AID).
    How can I express this in the logical model of the Data Modeler?
    What I tried so far: I engineered the logical model into a physical model and changed there one of the parallel relationships. I changed the associated child column of the redundant AID reference to the other one. After that Data Modeler asked me to remove the automatically created column, which does not have a reference any more. This seems to be a solution for the physical model.
    But: it seems to be neither possible to model this in the logical model directly nor is possible engineer the changes from the physical model back to the logical mode.
    So what can I do?
    I asked this question with some more concrete variable names at stackoverflow:
    http://stackoverflow.com/q/13027950/402322
    And this is the physical model after the modification explained above:
    https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/TCeW1Si0UOybltn34oIWj9MTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0

    Hi,
    you need to play with overlapping/folding attributes. Open properties dialog of entity D, go to "Overlapping attributes" page - you should see aid-aid1 pair listed. Check "fold" check box. Aid1 attribute will remain in entity but there will be no related column in relational model after forward engineering to it. You can change your decision during forward engineering - Data Modeler detects existence of overlapping keys and position engineering dialog on related tab.
    Philip

  • Update BP relationship from a user-exit in the BP

    Hi Everyone,
    Is it possible to update the BP relationship from within the BP, when a new BP is saved? I have a requirement to automatically create a new relationship when a BP is created. I am using BP events.
    Thanks,
    Margaret Brooker.

    Hi,
    Here is what you should do.
    Before calling BUR_BUPR_MEMORY_FILL, call FM BUP_BUPA_BUT000_GET. this gets you BUT000 data from current buffer. Here, the partner number shall be something like ##1 (as partner no is not yet determined). This is some kind of handle.
    Use this same value for partner1.
    This should work.
    Regards
    Kaushal

  • Allocating Costs from Variables giving Entity to Variables receiving Entity

    Hi everybody,
    I'm creating a Planning application (Classic Application 11.1.2 with Calculation Manager) and i'm a bit in trouble with a business rule. The issue is that i need to allocate some costs from some entities to other ones, assuming that both can vary according to what the user select, by using a driver selected in a SmartList
    In particular the requirement is:
    the giving Entities are identified by selecting a value in a SmartLIst in a dataform (every value you choose, in this way you identify a giving entities the entity are in the rows)
    the receiving Entities are identified by inserting a value for the driver selected in the smartlist in another data form (the entity are in the rows)
    So, I need to allocate some costs among entities within the same level and don't know which are the giving and the receiving entities. My outline is approximately like this (don't take care about the member names i'm using here):
    ENTITY: ent1,ent2....
    YEAR: fy12
    PERIOD begbalance
    ACCOUNT: acc1,acc2,acc3....
    VERSION: version allocated, version giving, version input
    SCENARIO: Scenario1
    I could use a runtime prompt variable letting the user select the giving entities but in this case the user could only select one entity at a time and there are more than 40 entities. In fact i set a replacement variable with type "member" named "PROVA" and the rule results as follow:
    The member "Driver" in the rule below identifies an Account member that refers the value that user can select in Smart List (i.e. if he choose 1 -> account is Salary, if he choose 2 -> account is Marketing costs and so on...). i don't tell about the IF condition (it inserts within second the FIX) to simplify the question.
    Fix("FY12","Scenario1,"BegBalance",@Levmbrs("Entity",0))
    Fix(@LEVMBRS("Account",0))
    "Version_allocated"="Version_allocated"+("Version_Giving"->{Prova}) * ("Driver"->"Versione_Input") / ("Drive"->"Versione_Input"->"Tot_Entity");
    endfix
    endfix
    I tried setting variable type on "Members" instead of "member" but it doesn't work (gives error), and i think it's right. I think the rule expects a single value for the variable PROVA. Obviously i can't use functions like @Descendants in place of the variable Prova. Maybe i could use a Loop that changes the value of the variable but i don't know how to do it.
    I'm reaching the conclusion that there's no feasible way. :(
    Wow, thanks in adavnce to anyone will spend his time trying to give me an hint and i hope i described the issue clearly.... any suggest is very appreciated.
    Thanks All
    Bye
    Maurizio

    Hi John,
    Thank you very much for your advice. The log does not say anything special. Just that user logs in but no other action (my changing values for user variables) because i suppose the save button is not working.
    But yes, if i go through workspace everything is working fine. But when going directly to planning (issue above always appears). Can you tell me why?
    thanks again

  • Sharepoint 2013: Problem / Error when creating Variation Hierarchy for French and German Languages from Variation root EN

    Hi,
    I have a website with English and Arabic Language Packs installed. I have the corresponding Variation heirachies created and the whole site collection is published.
    Recently the client asked for french and german languages to be accomodated as well. So I followed the same approach I did for English and arabic (installed the language packs) for foundation, ran ocnfiguration wizard, installed server language pack &
    ran configuration wizard.
    But after creating the variation label, when i try to create the variation heirarchy, I am getting the following error.
    "Unknown failure when creating a variation of page http://server:port/en/pages/default.aspx in label /fr/Pages/default.aspx.
    The Variations Create Hierarchies job failed with the following error message&  Unknown failure when creating a variation of site
    http://server:port/en in label fr."
    Am not sure what is going wrong. Appreciate a feedback.
    Thanks,
    SSP
    SSP

    Hi,
    According to your description, my understanding is that the error occurred when you created the Variation Hierarchy for French and German Languages from Variation root EN.
    I recommend to check the Resources folder located at C:\Program Files\Common Files\microsoft shared\Web Server Extensions\15 to see if the file core.fr-FR.resx exists in the folder.
    Here is a similar thread for you to take a look:
    http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/611575b2-d129-44c6-814b-2e5782178850/unknow-failure-when-creating-variations-in-sharepoint-2013-is-this-a-bug-in-sharepoint-2013-rtm?forum=sharepointadmin
    Best regards.
    Thanks
    Victoria Xia
    TechNet Community Support

  • Facing problem in creating socket in a method from an already deployed application exe while same method is working from another exe from same environment from same location.

    Dll Created In: - MFC VC
    6.0
    Application Exe Developed In:
    - VC 6.0, C# and VB.net (Applications which are using dll)
    OS: - Windows XP sp2 32bit
    / Windows Server 2008 64 bit
    Problem: - Facing problem in creating socket
    in a method from an already deployed application exe while same method is working from another exe from same environment from same location.
    Description: - We have product component which
    has an exe component and from exe we invoke a method, which is defining in dll, and that dll is developed in MFC VC6.0. In the dll we have a method which downloads images from another system after making socket connection. But every time we are getting Error
    code 7, it is not giving desire result while same method is working from another exe from same environment from same location. And also me dll is deployed on many systems and giving proper output from same application.
    Already Attempt: - Because error is coming on
    client side so what we did, we created a driver in C# which invokes same method from same environment(on client machine) using same dll and we are astonished because it worked fine there.
    Kindly Suggest: -
    We are not able to figure out root cause because nothing is coming in windows event logs but what I did, for finding the problem line, I wrote logs on each line and found the exact line in application exe which is not working,
    actually  it is not executing Create () method,
    I will give snippet of the code for understanding the problem because we are not finding any kind solution for it.
    Kindly assist us in understanding and fixing this problem.
    Code Snippet: -
    Int Initialize (LPTSTR SiteAddress, short PortId)
    try
    CClientTSSocket *m_pJtsSockto;
    m_pJtsSockto = new CClientTSSocket;
    LONG lErr = m_pJtsSockto->ConnectTS(csIPAddress,PortId);
    ErrorLog (0, 0, "--------ConnectTS has been called ------------","" );
    catch(...)
    DWORD errorCode = GetLastError();
    CString errorMessage ;
    errorMessage.Format("%lu",errorCode);
    ErrorLog (0, 0, "Image System", (LPTSTR)(LPCTSTR)errorMessage);
    return  IS_ERR_WINDOWS;
    Note: -
    CClientTSSocket extends CAsyncSocket
     IS_ERR_WINDOWS is a macro error code which value I found 7.
    LONG ConnectTS(CString strIP, UINT n_Port)
    ErrorLog(0,0,"ConnectTS is calling Create [is going to call]","");
    if(!Create())
    ErrorLog(0,0,"ConnectTS is calling [Create not called successfully] ","");
     n_Err = GetLastError();
     ErrorLog(n_Err,0,"ConnectTS is calling1111111111111111Erorrrrrrrrrrrrr","");
    return NET_INIT;
    ErrorLog(0,0,"ConnectTS is calling2222222222222222222","");
    if(!AsyncSelect(0))
    n_Err = GetLastError();
    return NET_INIT;
    if(!Connect(strIP,n_Port))
    n_Err = GetLastError();
    ErrorLog(n_Err,0,"ConnectTS","");
    return SERVER_NOT_CONNECTED;
    Code description: -
    From
    int GETImage_MT() method we call Initialize() method and pass client machine IP and Port and there we call
    ConnectTS() method, In this method we Create() method and finally it returns the error code as mention in macro 7.
    Logs after running the program: -
    --------ConnectTS has been called ------------
    ConnectTS is calling Create [is going to call]
    Image System 
    0
    Note: - According to logs, problem is coming in Create method().
    Here 0 is errorMessage received in catch block. And from catch block it returns macro value 7. And when we run same method individually from same machine, same environment through same dll
    from different exe, it is working fine and we are facing any kind of problem. While same problem application was working properly earlier but now continuously it showing problem.
     Kindly assist us to resolve the issue.

    Pointer variable was already initialized; I have mention in code; kindly assist us.
    Dll Created In: - MFC VC 6.0
    Application Exe Developed In: - VC 6.0, C# and VB.net (Applications which are using dll)
    OS: - Windows XP sp2 32bit / Windows Server 2008 64 bit
    Problem: - Facing problem in creating socket
    in a method from an already deployed application exe while same method is working from another exe from same environment from same location.
    Description: - We have product component
    which has an exe component and from exe we invoke a method, which is defining in dll, and that dll is developed in MFC VC6.0. In the dll we have a method which downloads images from another system after making socket connection. But every time we are getting
    Error code 7, it is not giving desire result while same method is working from another exe from same environment from same location. And also me dll is deployed on many systems and giving proper output from same application.
    Already Attempt: - Because error is coming
    on client side so what we did, we created a driver in C# which invokes same method from same environment (on client machine) using same dll and we are astonished because it worked fine there.
    Kindly Suggest:
    - We are not able to figure out root cause because nothing is coming in windows event logs but what I did, for finding the problem line, I wrote logs on each line and found the exact line in application exe which is not
    working, actually it is not executing Create () method, I will give snippet of the code for understanding
    the problem because we are not finding any kind solution for it. Kindly assist us in understanding and fixing this problem.
    Code Snippet: -
    Int Initialize (LPTSTR SiteAddress, short PortId)
    try
    CClientTSSocket *m_pJtsSockto;
    m_pJtsSockto = new CClientTSSocket;
    LONG lErr = m_pJtsSockto->ConnectTS(csIPAddress,PortId);
    ErrorLog (0, 0, "--------ConnectTS has been called ------------","" );
    catch(...)
                       DWORD errorCode = GetLastError();
                       CString errorMessage ;
                       errorMessage.Format("%lu",errorCode);
                       ErrorLog (0, 0, "Image System", (LPTSTR)(LPCTSTR)errorMessage);
                       return  IS_ERR_WINDOWS;
    Note: - CClientTSSocket extends CAsyncSocket
     IS_ERR_WINDOWS is a macro error code which value I found 7.
    LONG ConnectTS(CString strIP, UINT n_Port)
              ErrorLog(0,0,"ConnectTS is calling Create [is going to call]","");
              if(!Create())
                       ErrorLog(0,0,"ConnectTS is calling [Create not called successfully] ","");
              n_Err = GetLastError();
              ErrorLog(n_Err,0,"ConnectTS is calling1111111111111111Erorrrrrrrrrrrrr","");
                      return NET_INIT;
              ErrorLog(0,0,"ConnectTS is calling2222222222222222222","");
              if(!AsyncSelect(0))
                       n_Err = GetLastError();
                       return NET_INIT;
              if(!Connect(strIP,n_Port))
                       n_Err = GetLastError();
                       ErrorLog(n_Err,0,"ConnectTS","");
                       return SERVER_NOT_CONNECTED;
    Code description: - From int GETImage_MT() method
    we call Initialize() method and pass client machine IP and Port and there we call ConnectTS() method, In
    this method we Create() method and finally it returns the error code as mention in macro 7.
    Logs after running the program: -
    --------ConnectTS has been called ------------
    ConnectTS is calling Create [is going to call]
    Image System  0
    Note: - According to logs, problem is coming in Create method(). Here
    0 is errorMessage received in catch block. And from catch block it returns macro value 7. And when we run same method individually from same machine, same environment through same dll from different exe, it is working fine and we are facing any kind of problem.
    While same problem application was working properly earlier but now continuously it showing problem.
     Kindly assist us to resolve the issue.

  • Why do the file extensions (.jpg .gif .png) no longer appear when I click on a previously saved image to use that image's file name (particularly important when saving a series of images using the same root name)?

    I save a lot of images using firefox, often times from a large batch or series of images. It used to be that I would click on a previously saved image and the entire file name including the file extension (i.e. image_example.jpg) would appear in the "save as" line. Now when I click on a previously saved file, the file name appears without the file extension (i.e. image_example). Which means I have to manually type .jpg every time. For a large collection of images that I am hoping to use the same root file name and then add chronological numbers at the end, this has become incredibly frustrating, especially as it is a previously unnecessary task.
    I am using a new Macbook Pro and maybe there's something Apple related to this...? It did not happen on my old PowerBook G4. I have file extensions turned on in System Preferences.
    It should be noted that I have searched high and low and have even gone into the Apple Genius Bar where they were just confused as I was and of course ended by urging me to use Safari (shocker!) as it has all kinds of new extensions and bells and whistles. I seriously feel alone on an island with this dumb, hard to google problem. Thanks so much for any help anyone out there might have.
    I mean: is this as simple as changing a setting in about:config?
    Your assistance is greatly appreciated.

    Thanks for your response Mylenium, however like I mentioned multiple times, I did change all of my trackpad/scrolling settings in system preferences.  And if I wanted to use a normal mouse (or a tablet), I would've gotten an iMac instead of a MacBook Pro.  I travel often and work all over the place, not always with access to a decently sized workspace that would be required for using a mouse or tablet.

  • Is it possible to delete a relationship from the BP ?

    Hello experts,
    I'd would like to replace a function partner SH (having the same number as the DO) by another  from R3 to CRM5.
    At the begining i have in R3 this partner
    AG 3901007
    RE 3901007
    RG 3901007
    WE 3901007
    In R3 by the transaction VD02, I replace the partner SH by another
    After the modify i have in R3.
    AG 3901007
    RE 3901007
    RG 3901007
    WE 5000000
    When the replication is done in CRM using BDOC, i can see, by the transaction BP
    the new ship to party partner(5000000) .
    The trouble is :
    When customer access to ISA (standard version) to order product, he can select the partner 3901007 as shipping adress.
    By ISA, he should have the partner 5000000 only.
    Is it standard or is it a sap trouble ?
    Is it possible to delete a relationship from the BP ?
    I don't want to delete the BP partner, i just want to delete the relationship when then BDOC arrive in CRM.
    i have found the oss note 596334 497146 757955 too but it doesn't bring me a solution.
    Best regards
    Christophe

    Hello
    When you delete a Partner Function in R/3 the corresponding relationshipdoesn't get deleted in CRM. This is standard SAP behavior and not a
    bug. Reason for this behavior has been explained in Note 490454.
    You can change this behavior by implementing Note 497146. Also check
    the note 682427 which will help you in clearing old data.

  • Double Cost A/c impact of brrow & lent and Intrcompany in same legal entity

    Hello Experts / Dina,
    Could someone please explain me the double cost accounting impact on borrowed and lent process and inter-company accounting in same legal entity scenario?
    Example – Lets say US company X-star running the project on Mobile Apps development in US consulting division (Project Organization) and the resources from marketing division (Expenditure organization) are working on it on developing marketing campaign and decided to share the cost 100%.
    Using Borrow and Lent:-Assume MIS cost is charge of USD 100 on Project Mobile Apps Development. A/c is
    Debit- US Company-Marketing (Expenditure Org)-MIS Cost A/c (Expense A/c)-100 USD.
    Then if you use borrowed and lent accounting method the accounting entries will be generated as
    Debit- cost to US Company –US Consulting (Project Org) – MIS Cost A/c (Expense A/c)-100 USD
    Credit- cost to US Company-Marketing (Expenditure Org)-MIS Cost A/c (Expense A/c)-100 USD.
    In this case cost on Expenditure organization is totally reverse and cost is only charge to provider organization.
    In Inter-company scenario:- But let say if you are trying to implement the same scenario using inter-company accounting.
    Then MIS cost charge of USD 100 on project will derive the same accounting as mentioned above.
    Debit- US Company-Marketing (Expenditure Org)-MIS Cost A/c (Expense A/c)-100 USD.
    Revenue will generate below accounting.
    Credit- US Company-Marketing (Expenditure Org)-MIS Revenue A/c (Revenue A/c)-100 USD.
    And payables intercompany invoice in provider organization will generate below accounting.
    Debit- cost to US Company –US Consulting (Project Org) – MIS Intercompany Cost A/c (Expense A/c)-100 USD.
    Now the question is why in Inter-company scenario (2nd case example ) the cost of expenditure organization is not reverse similar like in borrow and lent scenario? I guess implementation of intercompany scenario results in double costing for same company (within legal entity).
    But this might look properly when you implement inter-company approach across legal entity as company can report separate expense and (internal-external) revenue across company.
    Similarly like inter-company scenario when you use inter project billing, you end up in creating double costing. Am I right?
    Please let me know whether my understanding is correct?
    Your reply on this will be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    :-)

    Hi
    Here are my responses along side your questions:
    1.With borrow and lent you cannot only cross charge within the same operating unit but also cross charge across operating unit only within same legal entity. Am I right?
    No. Borrow and Lent works only within the same operating unit. This functionality does not involve supplier and customer invoices, only accounting entries. When you cross operating units you must use the intercompany billing process.
    2.On the below example explained below sec 2.1; this perfectly works fine in scenario where organization within legal entities are agree to share the revenue.
    But what if the organizations agreed to share the cost? In that case it should generates the accounting mentioned below in section 2.2. Am I right.?
    2.1>; (Example provided by you- share revenue)
    Debit org B on "Internally Purchased Cost" account
    Credit org A on "internal Revenue" account
    2.2>;(same Example used by me with diff scenario of sharing the cost)
    Debit org B on "Internally Purchased Cost" account
    Credit org A on "Labor Cost A/c" account
    If so then isn't it nullifying the cost generated by Org A previously.
    2.2.1>;
    Debit Org A on "Labor Cost A/c"
    after generating borrow & lent
    Debit org B on "Internally Purchased Cost" account
    Credit org A on "Labor Cost A/c" account
    Resulting in general ledger module showing the cost on Org B "Internally purchase cost"
    Am I right?
    In my example the credit of the provider organization is on account - Internal revenue. This is not considered as revenue share, since the revenue of org A from its customer agreement is not decreased.
    Internal revenue and internal purchased costs are two accounts that are different from the norma business accounts. When you report in GL for the organization A you will get external revenue of 1000, labor cost of A of 300, and internal purchased cost of 400.  So margin of org A is 1000-300-400 = 300.
    When you report in GL for the organization B you will get internal revenue of 400, labor cost of 370, and org B margin is 400 - 370 = 30.
    When you report in GL for the entire company (summary of bot organizations) you will have - External revenue of 1000, labor cost of 670, and total margin of 330.
    Note the margin of the company is shared by org A -300, and org b - 30.
    To get the report of the total company I did not included the internal trading accounts - the internal purchased cost and the internal revenue.
    In the approach you provided you credited the cost of org B, rather than credit an internal revenue account.  That is also a legitimate approach. However for audit use I could suggest to use a separate account for crediting the costs o org B, and not the same original account of labor A/C.
    3.But lets say now if organization are agreed to share the cost but instead of using borrow and lent, they are agreed to use inter-company functionality then
    accounting entries will result mentioned below.Am I right?
    3.1>;
    Cost - Debit Org A on "Labor Cost A/c" account
    Inter-comp Invoice - Debit Org A on "Inter Receivable A/c" account
    Credit Org A on "Inter-revenue A/c" account
    Payables inter invoice - Debit Org B on "internally purchase a/c" account
    The accounting results of both processes could be the same. The difference is the introducing of AP & AR invoices and the need to run payments on both sides. In any case on org A you always debit an account which means internally purchase, cost purchased from another organization.  On org B you always credit an account that could be named internal revenue or cost reimbursement or cost reduction, etc.
    Now my worries are if both the process agrees on same principle of sharing the cost design for
    same purpose then why results in different accounting by finally creating double costing on Org A and Org B as well. Am I not sure whether my understanding is correct. Please help.
    Also mentioned by you earlier..
    "In GL you may want to offset both the internal trade accounts on a balancing value of cost center. So the internal revenue credit will offset the internally purchased cost debit."
    I am not sure how you can offset the internal revenue and cost account for Org A in GL. (is this done manually??) Could you please explain in detail if possible?
    My note about the need to offset in GL is related to the method of reporting. As explained in the example above, when reporting on the entire company you need to omit the internal trade accounts.  The method I use is to set up additional cost center value in GL which is not related to any real organization. This cost center is used for offset entries.
    I take the balance of internal purchased cost from of organizations and create a journal entry of the same amount but negative for the offset cost center.  The same is done for the balance of internal revenue of all cost center. As a result  the total internal purchased cost and the total of internal revenue at company level (accross all cost centers) is zero.  Now you can report on the entire company without the affect of the internal trade.  Those journal entries may be created automatically by allocation rules set up in GL.
    Dina

  • Handling Planned order created from Demand planning and Sales order in MTO

    Hi all
    In MTO\ Repetitive we genrate Dependent requirement from demand planning (PIR) after running MRP which finally planned order created but on the other hand in short term we have Sales order which generate planned order after running MRP(In MTO), How we should handle planned order generated from Demand planning and the ones generated from sales order.(both after MRP Running).
    Regards
    Babak Bolourchi

    Dear,
    You can combine the planning strategy also main as 56 and second as 65 and in demand managment MD61 you have the option select requirement type.
    Then while creating sales order use MTO strategy and take MRP run through MD50 and then MD02.
    and if you want to assign the stock to sales order then you and do it through MB1b with 412 E movement type.
    As per my knowledge, generally 56 strategy only takes Sales Order Stock into consideration.
    Consider setting the Individual/Collective indicator to 2.
    Mark those characteristics that should have a usage probability in demand management as Relevant for planning.
    Hope clear to you.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Failed to handle capwap control message from controller

    Hello,
    I am struggling in associating a 1242 AP's with WLC's.
    Show version of the AP:
    Cisco IOS Software, C1240 Software (C1240-K9W8-M), Version 12.4(25e)JAM2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
    Copyright (c) 1986-2013 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
    Compiled Mon 29-Jul-13 11:32 by prod_rel_team
    ROM: Bootstrap program is C1240 boot loader
    BOOTLDR: C1240 Boot Loader (C1240-BOOT-M) Version 12.3(7)JA1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    AP0019.56b0.855e uptime is 9 minutes
    System returned to ROM by power-on
    System image file is "flash:/c1240-k9w8-mx.124-25e.JAM2/c1240-k9w8-mx.124-25e.JAM2"
    Show inventory of the AP:
    AME: "AP1240", DESCR: "Cisco Aironet 1240 Series (IEEE 802.11a/g) Access Point"
    PID: AIR-LAP1242AG-E-K9, VID: V01, SN: FCZ10408384
    When trying to attach it to a WLC 5508 running 6.0.199.4, the AP keeps on downloading image and power cycling.
    When trying to attach it to a WLC 5508 running 7.4.110.0, the AP shows the following message :
    Jan 30 08:24:56.372: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: GOING BACK TO DISCOVER MODE
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.373: %DTLS-5-SEND_ALERT: Send FATAL : Close notify Alert to 10.71.142.7:5246
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.427: %LWAPP-3-CLIENTERRORLOG: LWAPP LED Init: incorrect led state 255
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.445: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to administratively down
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.445: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to administratively down
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.447: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.484: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:24:57.445: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to down
    *Jan 30 08:24:57.473: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to down
    *Jan 30 08:24:57.478: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to reset
    *Jan 30 08:24:58.466: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:24:58.473: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to down
    *Jan 30 08:24:58.503: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:24:58.508: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to down
    *Jan 30 08:24:58.513: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to reset
    *Jan 30 08:24:59.503: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:24:59.508: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to down
    *Jan 30 08:24:59.532: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:25:00.532: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:25:06.483: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Go join a capwap controller
    *Jan 30 08:25:07.000: %CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSEND: DTLS connection request sent peer_ip: 10.71.142.7 peer_port: 5246
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.565: %CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSUCC: DTLS connection created sucessfully peer_ip: 10.71.142.7 peer_port: 5246
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.567: %CAPWAP-5-SENDJOIN: sending Join Request to 10.71.142.7
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.598: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Invalid event 10 & state 5 combination.
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.599: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: CAPWAP SM handler: Failed to process message type 10 state 5.
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.599: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Failed to handle capwap control message from controller
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.599: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Failed to process encrypted capwap packet from 10.71.142.7 Jan 30 08:24:56.372: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: GOING BACK TO DISCOVER MODE
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.373: %DTLS-5-SEND_ALERT: Send FATAL : Close notify Alert to 10.71.142.7:5246
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.427: %LWAPP-3-CLIENTERRORLOG: LWAPP LED Init: incorrect led state 255
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.445: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to administratively down
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.445: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to administratively down
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.447: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:24:56.484: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:24:57.445: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to down
    *Jan 30 08:24:57.473: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to down
    *Jan 30 08:24:57.478: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to reset
    *Jan 30 08:24:58.466: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:24:58.473: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to down
    *Jan 30 08:24:58.503: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:24:58.508: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to down
    *Jan 30 08:24:58.513: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to reset
    *Jan 30 08:24:59.503: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:24:59.508: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to down
    *Jan 30 08:24:59.532: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:25:00.532: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
    *Jan 30 08:25:06.483: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Go join a capwap controller
    *Jan 30 08:25:07.000: %CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSEND: DTLS connection request sent peer_ip: 10.71.142.7 peer_port: 5246
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.565: %CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSUCC: DTLS connection created sucessfully peer_ip: 10.71.142.7 peer_port: 5246
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.567: %CAPWAP-5-SENDJOIN: sending Join Request to 10.71.142.7
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.598: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Invalid event 10 & state 5 combination.
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.599: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: CAPWAP SM handler: Failed to process message type 10 state 5.
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.599: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Failed to handle capwap control message from controller
    *Jan 30 08:25:08.599: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Failed to process encrypted capwap packet from 10.71.142.7
    Any idea ?
    Many thanks !

    here is the debug output:
    login as: groupwls
    (Cisco Controller)
    User: groupwls
    Password:************
    Your password does not meet the strong password requirements.For added security,                                                                              set a new password that meets these requirements. To prevent this message from                                                                              showing again, disable the strong password feature.
    (Cisco Controller) >debug pm pki enable
    (Cisco Controller) >debug capwap events enable
    (Cisco Controller) >*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.639: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 DTLS connection not found, creating new connection for 10:64:94:52 (2134) 10:71:142:8 (5246)
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: called to evaluate
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 0, CA cert >bsnOldDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 1, CA cert >bsnDefaultRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 2, CA cert >bsnDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 3, CA cert >bsnDefaultBuildCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 4, CA cert >cscoDefaultNewRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 5, CA cert >cscoDefaultMfgCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 0, ID cert >bsnOldDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 1, ID cert >bsnDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 2, ID cert >cscoDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCertFromCID: called to get cert for CID 155224fa
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 0, certname >bsnOldDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 1, certname >bsnDefaultRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 2, certname >bsnDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 3, certname >bsnDefaultBuildCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 4, certname >cscoDefaultNewRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 5, certname >cscoDefaultMfgCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 0, certname >bsnOldDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 1, certname >bsnDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 2, certname >cscoDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: called to evaluate
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 0, CA cert >bsnOldDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 1, CA cert >bsnDefaultRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 2, CA cert >bsnDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 3, CA cert >bsnDefaultBuildCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 4, CA cert >cscoDefaultNewRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 5, CA cert >cscoDefaultMfgCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 0, ID cert >bsnOldDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 1, ID cert >bsnDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 2, ID cert >cscoDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetSshPrivateKeyFromCID: called to get key for CID 155224fa
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetSshPrivateKeyFromCID: comparing to row 0, certname >bsnOldDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetSshPrivateKeyFromCID: comparing to row 1, certname >bsnDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetSshPrivateKeyFromCID: comparing to row 2, certname >cscoDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetSshPrivateKeyFromCID: match in row 2
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.883: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: locking ca cert table
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.883: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: calling x509_alloc() for user cert
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.883: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: calling x509_decode()
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: C=US, ST=California, L=San Jose, O=Cisco Systems, CN=C1240-001956b0855e, [email protected]
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetIssuerHandles:   O=Cisco Systems, CN=Cisco Manufacturing CA
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: Mac Address in subject is 00:19:56:b0:85:5e
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: Cert Name in subject is C1240-001956b0855e
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: Cert is issued by Cisco Systems.
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCID: called to evaluate
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 0, CA cert >bsnOldDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 1, CA cert >bsnDefaultRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 2, CA cert >bsnDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 3, CA cert >bsnDefaultBuildCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 4, CA cert >cscoDefaultNewRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 5, CA cert >cscoDefaultMfgCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCertFromCID: called to get cert for CID 2f6d981f
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 0, certname >bsnOldDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 1, certname >bsnDefaultRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 2, certname >bsnDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 3, certname >bsnDefaultBuildCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 4, certname >cscoDefaultNewRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 5, certname >cscoDefaultMfgCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: ssphmUserCertVerify: calling x509_decode()
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: ssphmUserCertVerify: user cert verfied using >cscoDefaultMfgCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: ValidityString (current): 2014/01/30/09:46:38
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: ValidityString (NotBefore): 2006/10/05/13:05:43
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: ValidityString (NotAfter): 2016/10/05/13:15:43
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: getting cisco ID cert handle...
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: called to evaluate
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 0, CA cert >bsnOldDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 1, CA cert >bsnDefaultRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 2, CA cert >bsnDefaultCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 3, CA cert >bsnDefaultBuildCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 4, CA cert >cscoDefaultNewRootCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 5, CA cert >cscoDefaultMfgCaCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 0, ID cert >bsnOldDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 1, ID cert >bsnDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 2, ID cert >cscoDefaultIdCert<
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.906: sshpmFreePublicKeyHandle: called with 0x2c058e50
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.906: sshpmFreePublicKeyHandle: freeing public key
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.169: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Allocated index from main list, Index: 312
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.169: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 DTLS keys for Control Plane are plumbed successfully for AP 10.64.94.52. Index 313
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.169: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 DTLS Session established server (10.71.142.8:5246), client (10.64.94.52:2134)
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.169: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Starting wait join timer for AP: 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.199: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Join Request from 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.200: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Deleting AP entry 10.64.94.52:2134 from temporary database.
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.201: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Join Version: = 117730816
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.201: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Join resp: CAPWAP Maximum Msg element len = 87
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.201: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Join Response sent to 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.201: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 CAPWAP State: Join
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.201: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 capwap_ac_platform.c:1225 - Operation State 0 ===> 4
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.201: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Register LWAPP event for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 slot 0
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.201: WARP IEs: (12)
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.202:      [0000] dd 0a 00 c0 b9 01 00 00 00 08 01 01
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.202: WARP IEs: (12)
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.202:      [0000] dd 0a 00 c0 b9 01 00 00 00 08 01 01
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.202: WARP IEs: (12)
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.202:      [0000] dd 0a 00 c0 b9 01 00 00 00 08 01 01
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.203: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Register LWAPP event for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 slot 1
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.203: WARP IEs: (12)
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.203:      [0000] dd 0a 00 c0 b9 01 00 00 00 08 01 01
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.203: WARP IEs: (12)
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.203:      [0000] dd 0a 00 c0 b9 01 00 00 00 08 01 01
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.203: WARP IEs: (12)
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.203:      [0000] dd 0a 00 c0 b9 01 00 00 00 08 01 01
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:41.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Configuration Status from 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:41.022: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 CAPWAP State: Configure
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:41.022: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP info for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 -- static 0, 10.64.94.52/255.255.255.0, gtw 10.64.94.254
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:41.022: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP 10.64.94.52 ===> 10.64.94.52 for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:41.023: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Setting MTU to 1485
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:44.028: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Configuration Status from 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:44.028: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 CAPWAP State: Configure
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:44.028: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP info for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 -- static 0, 10.64.94.52/255.255.255.0, gtw 10.64.94.254
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:44.028: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP 10.64.94.52 ===> 10.64.94.52 for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:44.029: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Setting MTU to 1485
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:47.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Configuration Status from 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:47.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 CAPWAP State: Configure
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:47.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP info for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 -- static 0, 10.64.94.52/255.255.255.0, gtw 10.64.94.254
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:47.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP 10.64.94.52 ===> 10.64.94.52 for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:47.022: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Setting MTU to 1485
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:50.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Configuration Status from 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:50.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 CAPWAP State: Configure
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:50.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP info for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 -- static 0, 10.64.94.52/255.255.255.0, gtw 10.64.94.254
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:50.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP 10.64.94.52 ===> 10.64.94.52 for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:50.022: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Setting MTU to 1485
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:53.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Configuration Status from 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:53.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 CAPWAP State: Configure
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:53.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP info for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 -- static 0, 10.64.94.52/255.255.255.0, gtw 10.64.94.254
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:53.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP 10.64.94.52 ===> 10.64.94.52 for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:53.022: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Setting MTU to 1485
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:56.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Configuration Status from 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:56.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 CAPWAP State: Configure
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:56.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP info for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 -- static 0, 10.64.94.52/255.255.255.0, gtw 10.64.94.254
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:56.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP 10.64.94.52 ===> 10.64.94.52 for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:56.022: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Setting MTU to 1485
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:59.019: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 DTLS keys for Control Plane deleted successfully for AP 10.64.94.52
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:59.026: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 DTLS connection closed event receivedserver (10:71:142:8/5246) client (10:64:94:52/2134)
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:59.026: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Entry exists for AP (10:64:94:52/2134)
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:59.026: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 apfSpamProcessStateChangeInSpamContext: Deregister LWAPP event for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 slot 0
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:59.026: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Deregister LWAPP event for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 slot 0
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:59.027: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 apfSpamProcessStateChangeInSpamContext: Deregister LWAPP event for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 slot 1
    *apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:59.027: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Deregister LWAPP event for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 slot 1
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:59.028: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 No AP entry exist in temporary database for 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask0: Jan 30 09:46:59.127: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Received LWAPP DISCOVERY REQUEST to 44:2b:03:b4:39:cf on port '13'
    *spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:46:59.128: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Request from 10.64.94.52:2135
    *spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:46:59.128: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Join Priority Processing status = 0, Incoming Ap's Priority 1, MaxLrads = 50, joined Aps =0
    *spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:46:59.128: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Response sent to 10.64.94.52:2135
    *spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:46:59.129: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Response sent to 10.64.94.52:2135
    *spamApTask0: Jan 30 09:46:59.129: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discarding discovery request in LWAPP from AP supporting CAPWAP
    *spamApTask0: Jan 30 09:47:28.995: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Received LWAPP DISCOVERY REQUEST to 44:2b:03:b4:39:cf on port '13'
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:47:28.996: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Request from 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:47:28.996: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Join Priority Processing status = 0, Incoming Ap's Priority 1, MaxLrads = 50, joined Aps =0
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:47:28.996: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Response sent to 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:47:28.996: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Response sent to 10.64.94.52:2134
    *spamApTask0: Jan 30 09:47:28.996: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discarding discovery request in LWAPP from AP supporting CAPWAP
    *spamApTask0: Jan 30 09:47:58.856: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Received LWAPP DISCOVERY REQUEST to 44:2b:03:b4:39:cf on port '13'
    *spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:47:58.857: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Request from 10.64.94.52:2135
    *spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:47:58.857: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Join Priority Processing status = 0, Incoming Ap's Priority 1, MaxLrads = 50, joined Aps =0
    *spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:47:58.857: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Response sent to 10.64.94.52:2135
    *spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:47:58.857: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Response sent to 10.64.94.52:2135
    *spamApTask0: Jan 30 09:47:58.857: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discarding discovery request in LWAPP from AP supporting CAPWAP
    *sshpmLscTask: Jan 30 09:48:10.688: sshpmLscTask: LSC Task received a message 4

Maybe you are looking for

  • Can I add a Hyperlink to Launchpad?

    I recently added a hyperlink from Safari to my desktop. Is there a way to move this to Launchpad? I tried dragging it over to Launchpad but it didn't work. I don't want to clutter my desktop which is why I want to put it in Launchpad and I don't want

  • Content delivery - using JSP

    I am trying to render content stored in BEA default repository using a JSP. Can you someone please provide some info on what JSP tags to use? Thanks in advance, VJ

  • Problems syncing what i want

    i tried to put my 250ish pictures onto my ipod touch and it says that one of the pictures was not added because it was not able to be viewed on my ipod... well when i get on my ipod's photo album there are only 3 pictures and they have shading proble

  • How to reset admin or power on password on Envy

    Hi, I have a envy laptop with admin or power on password protected. However, I forgot the password and it gave me 53791281 after 3 attempts . Please help! This question was solved. View Solution.

  • Problem In Tabular Data Block

    Hi, I have to two blocks on a form (1) CONTROL----------------------------------------->CONTROL BLOCK (2) DETAIL-------------------------------------------->DATA BLOCK DETAIL BLOCK has four items referencing DETAIL TABLE COLUMNS namely ROWNUMBER, ITE