Has anyone used LabView to control a Lumonics JK701H Laser?

I don't want to reinvent anything and was wondering if anyone has interfaced to a Lumonics JK701H laser via LabView. I haven't been able to find any drivers or shared source for this device yet.
Appreciate any pointers to finding information that would help LabView work with this device.

Unfortunately, I was unable to find a driver for this instrument either. It may be possible to modify an existing driver to work with the Lumonics JK701H laser. Otherwise, http://www.ni.com/devzone/idnet/other.htm states a few options to obtaining a driver. Drivers are developed based on demand and popularity so the more requests, the greater the possibility that one will be developed. It would also be beneficial to notify the instrument manufacturer. I hope this information helps.
A. Lynes
Applications Engineer
National Instruments

Similar Messages

HAS ANYONE USED SMC FAN CONTROL

Has anyone used this program it sets your fan to any rpm speed and it could cool down your system for about 50 percent of its normal temp.

If you plan on increasing your fan speeds then what I recommend is to monitor your temps for a few days before you go changing anything. Take note of your temps during idle times and light loads then also note the temps under heavy loads. There may be no reason for you to even adjust the fan speeds. You can install either iStat pro widget or Temperature Monitor: http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/19994
You might also find this topic useful:
http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=6412431#6412431
George

Has anyone used Labview to drive a Geckodrive, or similar step and direction servo/stepper drive? Thanks! -Kyle

I am running Labview 7 with a 1200 DAQ card.

KBClark,
It is indeed possible. You can find out more information by checking out this link: �Motion Control Software�. Perhaps someone in the community has specific experience and can be of more assistance. Good luck!
Craig H.
National Instruments

Has anyone used switch control and siri at the same time?

Has anyone used accessibility switch control and siri at the same time?

Using Xmarks and Sync simultaneously will create a mess.
You can create a new profile, import the bookmarks from your main profile, and set up Sync for the new profile.
The flip side is, bookmarks from your main profile would not get synced with your new profile.
Alternatively, Xmarks is also available for Android.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.xmarks.android&hl=en

Has anyone used Grid Control to implement DataGuard?

Has anyone used Grid Control to implement DataGuard?

Hi,
You are right, without the B&K software there is not much I can load. However this is usefull information. The VIs that you have are a wraper for the calls to the ActiveX pulse control. If those VIs do not provide the functionality for the Intensity Module there are 2 options:
+The developer did not develop VIs for the module
+The Pulse ActiveX control does not exposes the functionality of the Intensity Module.
To find this out, you can create a new VI that opens a reference to the Pulse ActiveX object and start looking for some property that gives you a reference to the Sound Intensity Module, or a a function that allows you to run any methods from the module. There are a bunch of examples that ship with LabVIEW on calling Ac
tiveX modules.
You can also try to get the documentation for the ActiveX interface for Pulse to find out whether the Module is exported or not.
There is also the option to use Native LabVIEW functions for the Sound Intensuty measurements; the Sound and Vibration Toolset can take sound intensity measurements that are compliant with industry standards.
Let me know how this goes.
Regards,
Juan Carlos

Has anyone used CORBA with LabVIEW?

Has anyone used CORBA with LabVIEW?

Did you have any success with this? I'm about to attempt the same thing and would rather not write intermediate functions in other other languages to do so...

Has anyone used the QuickUSB module (Bitswise Systems) to interface to a USB Camera via IMAQ for USB?

Has anyone used the QuickUSB module made by Bitwise Systems with LabVIEW for image acquisition. I have a USB camera and I'm trying to use the IMAQ for USB controls to no avail. Any input is appreciated.

Are you using the NI-IMAQ for USB functions or are you calling the QuickUSB libraries from LabVIEW? Unless the USB camera is DirectShow compliant, then it will not work with the NI-IMAQ for USB driver. You can use the Code Interface Node in LabVIEW to call external dll's, and it looks like from QuickUSB's website that is the best way to go. Hope this helps.
Jason N

Has anyone used a USB device server with a DAQmx or NI-VISA USB device?

Hi,
I have an application where I need to communicate with USB devices (some through DAQmx, others through NI-VISA) that will be more than 15 feet away from the controlling PC. I could use USB-ethernet-USB dongles, but I also see that there are USB-over-ethernet device servers available (like this one: http://www.usbgear.com/computer_cable_details.cfm?sku=USBNET-400&cats=104&catid=187%2C188%2C104%2C65...). Has anyone used these or similar USB device servers successfully with LabVIEW?
Thanks,
JasonP

http://forums.ni.com/t5/Multifunction-DAQ/Does-NI-offer-USB-extension-solutions/td-p/381873
http://forums.ni.com/t5/Dynamic-Signal-Acquisition/Using-a-quot-USB-2-0-extender-over-Cat-5-quot-to-...
http://forums.ni.com/t5/Multifunction-DAQ/Can-I-use-a-USB-Extender-with-USB-6008-or-cDAQ/td-p/920361
Let me know if you have any more questions.
Product Support Engineer
National Instruments

Use Labview to control two Picomotor actuators successively through Model 8753 iPico driver

Hello All,
I want to use Labview to control two Picomotor actuators(belong to channel A ,C) successively through Model 8753 iPico driver.Since the example VI's
(Application.vi) from Newport's website just control one actuator at one time, so I copied the example code, thus there are two repetitive sections (see the attachment) in
the while loop structure. The test result was that two Picomotor actuators moved to respective target position circularly. And I found the test was correct when two Picomotor actuators belonged to different address. Can anyone tell why ,what should I do? Any assistance with this matter is greatly appreciated.
Best Regards,
Attachments:
control two picomotor actuators.vi ‏90 KB

BRox,
I had a look at the examples and obviously all it does is to communicate to the drive through RS232 with a proprietary protocol. With the documentation in the block diagram and the documentation of the protocol it shouldn't be too hard to understand what's going on, but on the other side NewFocus has obviously missed a chance to provide a high level and easy to use API for their product...
I can't dive too deeply into the features of this drive, but before you spend too much time on understanding their command language, you should check with NewFocus, if it is possible at all to meet your requirements with their hardware. The main reason why I doubt that is the slow communication speed provided by RS232. The only way to reach a sinusoidal motion profile of 30 to 70 Hz with this type of communication is running the complete trajectory generation and interpolation onboard. If you have planned to generate the motion profile in LabVIEW and send setpoint commands to the drive this will probably not work.
If the drive provides another command input (e. g. an analog +/- 10 V input for torque or velocity command signals), we can talk about alternative approaches.
Regards,
Jochen Klier
National Instruments

Has anyone used JAAS with WebLogic?

Has anyone used JAAS with Weblogic? I was looking at their example, and I have a bunch of questions about it. Here goes:
Basically the problem is this: the plug-in LoginModule model of JAAS used in WebLogic (with EJB Servers) seems to allow clients to falsely authenticate.
Let me give you a little background on what brought me to this. You can find the WebLogic JAAS example (to which I refer below) in the pdf: http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs61/pdf/security.pdf . (I believe you want pages 64-74) WebLogic, I believe goes about this all wrong. They allow the client to use their own LoginModules, as well as CallBackHandlers. This is dangerous, as it allows them to get a reference (in the module) to the LoginContext's Subject and authenticate themselves (i.e. associate a Principal with the subject). As we know from JAAS, the way AccessController checks permissions is by looking at the Principal in the Subject and seeing if that Principal is granted the permission in the "policy" file (or by checking with the Policy class). What it does NOT do, is see if that Subject
has the right to hold that Principal. Rather, it assumes the Subject is authenticated.
So a user who is allowed to use their own Module (as WebLogic's example shows) could do something like:
//THEIR LOGIN MODULE (SOME CODE CUT-OUT FOR BREVITY)
public class BasicModule implements LoginModule
private NameCallback strName;
private PasswordCallback strPass;
private CallbackHandler myCB;
private Subject subj;
         //INITIALIZE THIS MODULE
           public void initialize(Subject subject, CallbackHandler callbackHandler, Map sharedState, Map options)
                  try
                       //SET SUBJECT
                         subj = subject; //NOTE: THIS GIVES YOU REFERENCE
TO LOGIN CONTEXT'S SUBJECT
                                                 // AND ALLOWS YOU TO PASS
IT BACK TO THE LOGIN CONTEXT
                       //SET CALLBACKHANDLERS
                         strName = new NameCallback("Your Name: ");
                         strPass = new PasswordCallback("Password:", false);
                         Callback[] cb = { strName, strPass };
                       //HANDLE THE CALLBACKS
                         callbackHandler.handle(cb);
                  } catch (Exception e) { System.out.println(e); }
     //LOG THE USER IN
       public boolean login() throws LoginException
          //TEST TO SEE IF SUBJECT HOLDS ANYTHING YET
          System.out.println( "PRIOR TO AUTHENTICATION, SUBJECT HOLDS: " +
subj.getPrincipals().size() + " Principals");
          //SUBJECT AUTHENTICATED - BECAUSE SUBJECT NOW HOLDS THE PRINCIPAL
           MyPrincipal m = new MyPrincipal("Admin");
           subj.getPrincipals().add(m);
           return true;
         public boolean commit() throws LoginException
               return true;
    }(Sorry for all that code)
I tested the above code, and it fully associates the Subject (and its principal) with the LoginContext. So my question is, where in the process (and code) can we put the LoginContext and Modules so that a client cannot
do this? With the above example, there is no Security. (a call to: myLoginContext.getSubject().doAs(...) will work)
I think the key here is to understand JAAS's plug-in security model to mean:
(Below are my words)
The point of JAAS is to allow an application to use different ways of authenticating without changing the application's code, but NOT to allow the user to authenticate however they want.
In WebLogic's example, they unfortunately seem to have used the latter understanding, i.e. "allow the user to authenticate however they want."
That, as I think I've shown, is not security. So how do we solve this? We need to put JAAS on the server side (with no direct JAAS client-side), and that includes the LoginModules as well as LoginContext. So for an EJB Server this means that the same internal permission
checking code can be used regardless of whether a client connects through
RMI/RMI-IIOP/JEREMIE (etc). It does NOT mean that the client gets to choose
how they authenticate (except by choosing YOUR set ways).
Before we even deal with a serialized subject, we need to see how JAAS can
even be used on the back-end of an RMI (RMI-IIOP/JEREMIE) application.
I think what needs to be done, is the client needs to have the stubs for our
LoginModule, LoginContext, CallBackHandler, CallBacks. Then they can put
their info into those, and everything is handled server-side. So they may
not even need to send a Subject across anyways (but they may want to as
well).
Please let me know if anyone sees this problem too, or if I am just completely
off track with this one. I think figuring out how to do JAAS as though
everything were local, and then putting RMI (or whatever) on top is the
first thing to tackle.

Send this to:
newsgroups.bea.com / security-group.

Has anyone used a Dell 1908FPb with a MacBook Pro OSX 10.6.8? What do I need to get/do? thanks

Has anyone used a Dell 1908FPb with a MacBook Pro OSX 10.6.8? What do I need to get/do? thanks

Hi 4judy,
If you are looking to use an external display with your MacBook Pro, you may find the following articles helpful:
Apple Mini DisplayPort adapters: Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht3382
OS X: How to use multiple displays with your Mac in Mountain Lion and earlier
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht5019
Regards,
- Brenden

Has anyone used reMIDI as a plug-in for GarageBand. I downloaded a trial version of reMIDI, which enables MIDI instruments to be strummed or arpegiated, but can't get it to work in Garageband. How do I set it up?

Has anyone used reMIDI as a plug-in for Garageband ('08)? The program allows MIDI instruments to be strummed or arpegiated. I have a trial version, but can't get it to work in Garageband. Wonder how to set it up.
Thanks, Doctor Mark

Port Forwarding.....or Port Mapping....as Apple calls it is a difficult and complex configuration method for most users. Because there are so many variables involved in this type of setup, it is not possible to provide a step by step guide that will work for everyone with all devices.
It is possible that a setup guide exists for the the WD drive and AirPort Extreme, but you will have to go looking for it on the Internet. Even if you find one, it may not be tailored to your specific situation or needs.
Sometimes, you can do everything right....at least according to someone's article or "how to" guide, and things still will not work correctly.
In situations like this, when you really don't know what to do, you need to enlist the aid of an IT pro, who will know what to do based on your particular products and unique circumstances. Sometimes....they won't be able to get things working either due to particular circumstances.
But, before you do this, I would strongly recommend that you use a Static IP address for your Internet connection with your ISP. If you do not have this now, contact them to ask them if they offer this type of connection. Expect to pay more for this type of service, of course.

I need to program a Hittite Fractional-N Synthesizer Evaluation Kit with a HMC702LP6CE an external YIG oscillator. Not sure how to use Labview to control the PLL.

I need to program a Hittite Fractional-N Synthesizer Evaluation Kit with a HMC702LP6CE an external YIG oscillator. Not sure how to use Labview to control the PLL.

Here is how to use the PLL. But I don't know of how to interact with that device
http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/3781
And for thouse who don't know what a PLL is a free bonus link is here:
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/07BC8D77D4E9AE258625708B007CE74F?OpenDocument
and a second one on what that device is: http://www.hittite.com/products/view.html/view/HMC702LP6CE
Now we are all caught up to speed.
Sam S
Applications Engineer
National Instruments

Has anyone used Aperture 2.0 with 8800GT?

Has anyone used Aperture 2.0 with the new 8800GT? I'm about to order a new Mac Pro and wonder if Aperture will get a speed boost with the 8800GT over the HD 2600XT. I've read many times that Aperture is very GPU dependent, but then I've also read, on Barefeats.com for example, that the graphics card really doesn't do that much of a difference after all.
For me, on my dual 2.0 G5 with 4.5GB and a X800XT, what's been most annoying with Aperture 1.5 has been the slow load times for raw images (15-20MB). But now with the quick preview mode in Aperture 2.0, that really isn't an issue any more.
Is the 8800GT worth waiting for, or should I just get the Mac Pro now with the HD 2600XT?

Hi Don
I'm using Aperture 2.0 with the 8800GT. My system is the new MacPro 8 core 2.8GH with 10GB RAM. I'm shooting Nikon D3 lossless compressed RAW files. Approximately 12-14MB each.
I do not need to use the quick preview mode. Images open instantaneously,either fit to screen or 100%. All the image adjustments are shown with no time lag. My D2X uncompressed raw files,19MB, display in approximately one second with quick preview turned off.
I'm no MAC hardware expert so I don't know how much the speed is the result of the 8800GT but I'm just one happy camper.
Hope this helps
John Blake

Has anyone used Thunderbolt or USB 3.0?

In the not too distant future I am intending to upgrade from my 2008 24" 2.8GHz iMac.
The new models appear to have gone down the Thunderbolt route which appears to be not very popular with HDs being few and far between and very expensive.
USB 3.0 whilst theoretically only half the speed seems to be taking off and reasonably cheap, and appears to be more universally adopted.
Could Apple have backed the wrong horse on this occasion?
Sorry, I was just thinking aloud, definitely not speculating.
So has anyone used Thunderbolt and got anything good or bad to say about it?

Not personally:
The german computer-magazine c't tested the Promise Pegasus R6 Thunderbolt and found it speedwise way ahead of USB 3.0 and eSATA.
As a RAID-Level 0 with 6 x Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 (7.200 U/min, 1TB each) and MBP 13" 2011 OSX 10.6.8:
Write - 693 MByte/s
Read - 721 MByte/s
Read AND Write - 323 MByte/s
Time Machine -capable and OS X Bootable.
0.8 Sone when active
61.6 W active - 48 W when not used.
Sadly the article is not avaibale other than Printed.
Stefan

Has anyone used LabView to control a Lumonics JK701H Laser?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for