Having DW CS3 update lib items to XHTML strict

Question

I created 2 .lib files in fireworks but now I am trying to
update the code so that it will it can be validated to xhtml strict
(such as the <img>, <a> tags being closed properly ...
/>). So is there a way to automatically have DW do that or must
I do it manually?
And similarly, I need to convert all the pages I already
created to the strict standard, so is there an auto way to do that
across the whole site.
No I am not lazy, just like to stream-line the work. :)
thanks.

Answer 1

> it was stricter - i.e. it demanded that I closed tags
such as <li>
> and all those things
<ahem> - the <li> tag already has a proper
closing tag (</li>)!
> and using validators - I at least found it helped find
my errors more
> easily with xhtml.
How so?
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
==================
"Malcolm _" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:55:50 +0200, Michael Fesser
<[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>If you deliver your XHTML as text/html, which almost
every site does,
>>then you're in fact delivering HTML, just with a
fancy syntax. In order
>>to make that work you can't write "real" XHTML, but
have to follow the
>>HTML compatibility guidelines and have to deliver
your markup as HTML to
>>make the browsers parse and render it as HTML. In
short: Your documents
>>are still much more HTML than XHTML! So what's left
from the nice and
>>clean XHTML in the end? Almost nothing.
>
> Yes I know that :-)
>
> We will never resolve this debate I fear -
>
> I have read many books, websites etc on this subject and
as a humble
> amateur - albeit with software training in the past - I
got awfully
> confused.
>
> But I tried both html / and xhtml ( ok, ok rendered
using html not xml
> :-)) )
>
> What I found was that I preferred xhtml because -
>
> it was stricter - i.e. it demanded that I closed tags
such as <li>
> and all those things
>
> and using validators - I at least found it helped find
my errors more
> easily with xhtml.
>
> I'm a simple pragmatic sort of guy - I just found xhtml
easier.
>
> If one day html 5 eventually arrives :-)
> I am 95% sure that browsers will be slow to adapt and in
the meantime
> people like Adobe and the vast open source movement will
produce
> converters that will change my code from xhtml 1.0 to
html 5 :-))
>
>
>
> --
>
> ~Malcolm~*...
> ~*