HCP: host header for xs application

Hi,
Can anyone point me to the configuration we need to setup in order to use ours ISP registered CNAME pointed to HCP dns?
e.g. we have HCP dns name like "<account name>.hana.ondemand.com" we want it to be resolved to our url like "mycompany.com"
for that we have "mycompany.com" cname registered and pointed it to "<account name>.hana.ondemand.com"
But it looks like HCP does not accept an all catch host header (*) and we are not sure where this can be configured , so that we only get "Service Unavailable" error. Pinging "mycompany.com" shows that its correctly resolved to "<account name>.hana.ondemand.com", but then HCP rejects that
Thanks!
Artem

use this powershell to create it, if the problem still exists let me know
$ap = New-SPAuthenticationProvider
New-SPWebApplication -Name "Contoso Internet Site" -Port 80 -HostHeader sharepoint.contoso.com -URL "http://www.contoso.com" -ApplicationPool "ContosoAppPool" -ApplicationPoolAccount (Get-SPManagedAccount "DOMAIN\jdoe") -AuthenticationProvider $ap -SecureSocketsLayer
also check that you adjusted the proxy settings in web.configs
Kind Regards, John Naguib Technical Consultant/Architect MCITP, MCPD, MCTS, MCT, TOGAF 9 Foundation

Similar Messages

Hosting Services for Forms6i Applications

Is Oracle providing application hosting services for forms6i applications.
we are Desperately looking for these services
and with services charges
Thanks in advance
Shahid

Thanks for sharing the info, Im sure its useful to the community
K

Custom host-name for web application SharePoint 2010

I am facing a weird behavior. Can anyone help me regarding this?
Steps performed:
1. Created a web application using custom host name.
2. Created a site collection using "Blank" site template. Nothing issues.
3. Created another site collection using "Publishing" site template. Authentication prompt came multiple times. IIS logs/Fiddler/HTTP Watch are full with 401 entries.
4. Added the custom host-name with web server IP in local desktop hosts file(which is in intranet domain). Prompt issue fixed.
5. Authentication mode set as NTLM.

Hi DDasgupta,
After you created a web application with a custom host name, if you got a prompt for the user and you may face the following issues:
There is continuous prompt for the credentials
HTTP 401.1 error
This shows that there is a problem with the Loopback configuration. This situation should occur only when we access the application from the server machine.
For fixing the problem, we have to disable the Loopback value inside the registry.Open the Registry Editor (regedit.exe) and locate the following key:HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa, and create a new Key Value of type DWORD inside
it and set the value to 1.
More information, please refer to the link:
http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/UploadFile/40e97e/sharepoint-2010-creating-host-name-for-web-application/
I hope this helps.
Thanks,
Wendy
Wendy Li
TechNet Community Support

What to look for in a web hosting company for Flex applications

Hello,
I am trying to figure out what I need to look for in a web
hosting company if I want to deploy my own Flex applications? I
don't anticipate having any special requirements other than the
ability to interact with databases and XML files. Can someone help
me figure out what the server-side requirements are?
Thanks in advance!
Matt

then almost 99.9% hosting will work.
if you want a Flexx app with compiler then oo thats different
but as you say "I don't anticipate having any special requirements
other than the ability to interact with databases and XML files"
then you can go with pretty much any hosting, as long as they have
apache, Database serve and I think thats it.

Web hosting service for Sun Application Server

Can anyone tell me if there is any webhostingf service that uses Sun Applications Server...pls pls pls....

Yeah, I can understand the pain. I don't know about anybody else, but I'd like to work with you 1 on 1 via email to help ease the tomcat deployment issues, if that's something you'd like to give another shot at?
Please drop me a line at, if interested:
raveqa-testapps AT SUN DOT COM
I found the thread below to be of help in most tomcat deployment issues, but let's see what we can do to get you up and running with the absolute minimal effort needed in configuration.
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5101183
/sqad

Crawl issue - warning: "This URL is part of a host header SharePoint deployment and the search application is not configured to crawl individual host header sites. This will be crawled as a part of ....a start address"

Hello all,
I have a multi-tenant environment in SharePoint 2010 server. Different tenants are hosted by one web app.
One content source has been created to crawl the all shared environment. (the only URL added in the content source settings = URL of the
web app)
Crawl everything under the hostname for each start address has been selected when creating this content source.
Now I have created a new tenant hosted by the same web app. For this new tenant I want to have a different crawl schedule. Simple , I just create a new content source and add the host URL of this tenant. With the same settings has the other content source.
After having started a full crawl I get 0 success and 1 warning : “This URL is part of a host header SharePoint deployment and the search application is not configured to crawl
individual host header sites. This will be crawled as a part of the host header Web application if configured as a start address.”
The first content source is well crawling the new tenant freshly created. Could you tell me where I’m wrong?
Thanks in advance
Regards
Baldo

Baldo,
In the configuration that you described you now have 2 content sources set to crawl the same content. If you have a content source with a start address of http://servername/ then it is going to crawl everything past that address. If you are now changing
the crawl schedule based on the individual site collections, you will need to move your start addresses further down the URL.
For Example:
1st Content Source:
http://servername/ as a start address would now become
http://servername/site1
http://servername/site2
2nd Content Source:
http://servername/site3
Also remember that all crawling must happen on the default zone. If you are trying to crawl a zone that the web application has been extended into, that will not work.
ScottC - Microsoft SharePoint Support

Best application hosting scenario for weblogic servers

Frankly speaking, it depends on the company interest, if you have a multi
environment, it is always better to standardize a single J2EE platform
server, Weblogic could be your choice, it can almost runs every type of
applications in this world. Check out some customers for BEA at BEA website
for different types of business from ViSA to AirFlight company.
"Vinay S" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
>
Greetings...
What is the best/optimum application hosting scenario for weblogic serversat
an organization level? Assuming there are many applications to bedeployed, wd
the best solution be to create a managed server for each such applicationand
deploy the application on it?
What factors are critical to detemine the number of applications that canbe hosted
on a admin/managed server? Are any stats available?
Please also consider the monitoring view point for the servers.
Thanks...

ACE ; probe for host header-value

Hi,
we have following probe setup. sometimes this probe fails because server resets the connection but server team claims there aren't any issues with server.
probe https probe1.abc.com:10456
port 10456
interval 34
passdetect interval 17
ssl version all
expect status 200 200
header Host header-value "probe1.abc.com"
open 1
is there a way to validate able probe using linux/linux servers? i.e. using unix/linux server is there a way to send that host header-value to the servers and see if servers are responding with 200 OK status? if not from Unix/Linux servers than if there any otherway to validate it apart from validating it from ACE?
Thanks...

or can we do it using window? maybe using firefox on windows machine?
please advise.

Host Header Site Collection and Web App Setup - Thoughts

I am trying to understand relation between AAM and web app extension .Please share your expert opinion. I have not seen any TechNet article talking about it clearly.
Here it goes: in 2010 it was recommended Not to use AAM with IIS bindings without extending the web application. This was mentioned in several TechNet articles also its a known “Mistake #4” on TechNet articles.
So question is, is that still the same case in 2013?
Most of the times it is recommended to remove web app host header from IIS if you are using this web app for HHSC, otherwise sites will not be accessible. I have find no issues by leaving web app host header and adding more bindings for host header site
collections any thoughts on this ?
Thanks.

Hi,
I found some articles for helping understand Extend web application and
Alternate access mappings.
“If you want to expose the same content in a Web application to different types of users by using additional URLs or authentication methods, you can extend an existing Web application into a new zone. When you extend the Web application into a new zone,
you create a separate Internet Information Services (IIS) Web site to serve the same content, but with a unique URL and authentication type. An extended Web application can use up to five network zones (Default, Intranet, Internet, Custom, and Extranet). For
example, if you want to extend a Web application so that customers can access content from the Internet, you select the Internet zone and choose to allow anonymous access and grant anonymous users read-only permissions. Customers can then access the same Web
application as internal users, but through different URLs and authentication settings..”
After you extend web application, there is a new site created in IIS but the content are the same. We extend it to a new zone for different authentication methods, so that we could support different security between Internet site, Intranet site and Extranet
site.
“Alternate access mappings direct users to the correct URLs during their interaction with SharePoint 2013. Alternate access mappings enable SharePoint 2013 to map web requests to the correct web applications and sites, and they enable SharePoint 2013 to
serve the correct content back to the user.”
AAM is to offer different urls to users to access one site. Sometimes the url of a site is not easy to remember , we could use AAM to create simple url.
Regards,
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected] .
Rebecca Tu
TechNet Community Support

Host Header Flash Forms Problems

Hello,
I'm running CFMX 7.01 on IIS 6, Windows 2003 Server....
I've created an intranet application that uses several flash
forms. The site is located in the folder of
C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\CorpComWeb. This can be referenced from the
Default website by
http://sandy/corpcomweb/ OR
http://CorpComm (after adding an
internal DNS host header and then referencing it in Website -
Advanced - Host header value). This works great for every page
EXCEPT the two pages that contain CF Flash Forms. When I try to
access these pages using
http://CorpComm/flashformpage.cfm it spins into infinity (no
error just never loads). If I access the page by
http://sandy/corpcomweb/ the
page loads fine.
Any ideas as to why this would be?
Thanks in advance!

Ok, stupid mistake on my part.
When creating the new site in IIS, I forgot to add a virtual
directory pointing to CFIDE...

Flow chart for FPGA application

This is a general question but important: how should I setup the strategy to develop a LabView FPGA/RT/Windows application? In text-based programming languages flowcharts become useful to sort out where to start and where to end, but when I am developing Labview VIs in three spaces, FPGA VI, RT host VI, and Windows host VI which one would be the head and tail? Should one VI be completed then the next one started or develop small portions of every VI at a time? I am using the later method which is not always efficient especially for large applications.
I am wondering if any one has come across with those questions and can share his/er experiences.
Thanks.

I think the perfect place for you to start is the NI CompactRIO Developers Guide. This can also be helpful if its a non-CompactRIO application but uses Windows, RT and FPGA.
Personally I like the idea of writing your FPGA VI first, and get it acquiring the data you need. Then you can write the RT VI that accesses the data from the FPGA VI and does the processing. Once you have this processing done, you can finish off in the Windows VI for User interface. Of course as you go along you will have to go backwards to add modifications to the lower code to make communication possible, but it usually works out pretty good for me..
David_L | Certified LabVIEW Architect
LabVIEW Tools Network | LabVIEW Tools Network Developer Center

How sharepoint understand when user requests for web applications by their DNS names

HI
I configured Alternate access mapping in my sharepoint farm for default ,intranet zones
and spt farm has two web front end servers and they load balancing by F5 device
in WFE servers there are different web applications are running on different ports
so here I want to know how load balancing works, load balancing configured in F5 device.
when users request a webapplication from browser (ex http://cms) where this request will go
1)when I ping cms and other web applicaations it returns me a loadbalancer server IP for all web applications;
ping cms : it returns 10.xxx.0.80 , same ip returns when I ping for other web app
but ex CMS web application run on the 10.xxx.1.26:81 port in sharepoint server
2) and these sharepoint web applications running on different ports in sharepoint web servers , so here how sharepoint understand when user requests for web applications by their DNS names
http://cms and http://products etc
adil

I'm not sure if the F5 can add a port number (I'm not an expert on load balancers). But in general if you design the SharePoint site to run on port 81 then you need to have port 81 appended to the request or it won't work. http://cms in your
example would take you to http://cms:80 not http://cms:81. But in general DNS will resolve the address back to the F5 load balancer. The load balancer will look at the header of the HTTP request (which contains the original address you requested)
and forward the request to the appropriate web front end IP address. If your web front end is using one IP address for multiple sites then those sites need to be differntiated by using a custom port like 81 (which must be included in the original request)
or because a host header was bound to the web application when it was created. If they are running on different port numbers then the request must include the port number by the time it gets to the SharePoint server.
Paul Stork SharePoint Server MVP
Principal Architect: Blue Chip Consulting Group
Blog: http://dontpapanic.com/blog
Twitter: Follow @pstork
Please remember to mark your question as "answered" if this solves your problem.

Moving host header site collections to a different URL

Background:
We have a SharePoint 2010 farm with a single web app. Within this web app, we have over 40 site collections. Unfortunately when they were created, they were all put under their own explicit managed path. So now we have over 40 managed paths
and the recommended number of managed paths is 20. We are planning to create wildcard managed paths and move site collections from
https://servername/sitename to
https://servername/U/sitename to reduce the number of managed paths.
The implications of this are clear for site collections that are not host header site collections. Site collection admins will have to adjust any URLs that refer to items in the site collection. It is less clear for host header site collections.
From the user's point of view, the host header URL itself will not change.
1. Will internal links in the host header site collections need to be adjusted like in regular site collections?
2. Will the e-mail address of e-mail enabled lists and libraries change?
I would be grateful if anybody has an answer to this.
Sheila

If you moved http://sitename.webapplication.domain.com (ie. a host named site collection) to http://webapplication.domain.com/managedPath/sitename then it would obviously have a different URL.
That is not what you were describing in your first post, the terminiology is a little specific and I think you're getting it a bit wrong. A web application (often) has a host header, that will not change moving a site from an explicit path to a wilcard path.
A host named site collection is very different and more complicated
If you are planing on converting
http://webapplication.domain.com/site1
http://webapplication.domain.com/site2
http://webapplication.domain.com/site3
to
http://webapplication.domain.com/sites/site1
http://webapplication.domain.com/sites/site2
http://webapplication.domain.com/sites/site3
Then you are not using Host Named (or host header) Site Collections, those are bog standard managed path site collection addresses.
Now to answer your question: for users to access the sites after the move they must use the /sites/siteX version, if they use an old link then it will not work.
There is a trick in SharePoint that will keep links that exist within the site collection consistent so that some URLs will be maintained. This is called a relative URL and means that URLs that are within the same Site Collection will automatically work
with the new URLs.

APEX 3.0 with Single Sign On for single application

Hi All,
I have been playing around with SSO (IAS 10.1.2) and an APEX application for the past couple of days and am still having problems.
I have followed the instructions word for word in the various how to documents named in this forum and am now at the point where I successfully redirect to SSO login page > login using a username created in OID (which is the same username/password in my application) > then get redirected back to "http://<MY_SSO_HOST>:7777/sso/auth"..
Some things about my instance:
1. Oracle DB > 10g 10.1.2
2. Oracle IAS > 10g 10.1.2 (different server to above)
3. APEX 3.0 > trying to run SSO authentication against a single application rather than the whole APEX instance.
4. I have (after a lot of grief - figured out that the DAD MUST be /pls/somedad and that the port number 80 must be defined in the SSO token regardless - those two little gems got me as far as I am..
Now I know very little about SSO and am trying to evaluate it for my application (which uses a DB login/password and has to continue to do so for other reasons which I do not control). I am assuming there is some method of synchronizing the OID/SSO repository with my db accounts but haven't yet figured that one out.
I cannot for the life of me see what's wrong here. Any ideas??

Thanks Scott..
Okay let me go through the responses here..
...login using a username created in OID (which is the same username/password in my application)
My application overlays another Oracle application (old client server) which relies on physical database user accounts to perform its own internal grants etc. i.e. it uses where USER = blah all over the place.
Therefore my application is currently using the internal authentication scheme DATABASE (using DAD to resolve the credentials). In attempting to use SSO I am assuming that SSO must in some way be synched with my database (otherwise how does it pass any password changes applied in SSO to the database?)
Given that it's a base install (SSO) the only login I have there is the default orcladmin account. So I am trying to figure out how to get SSO to pass an acceptable login name/password to my application. My first attempt has been to create a user in OID that matches the DB login to see if SSO passes these on login - maybe I'm completely missing the point here??
...After login you get redirected to "http://<MY_SSO_HOST>:7777/sso/auth"? That's not right..
I have created/registered the application as per the how to guide using <my app name>.<my host>:<port> and setting the success URL to http://<my host>:<port>/pls/<mydad>/<my schema>.<custom success proc>
When I fire up my browser and go to http://<my host>/pls/<mydad>/f?p=9900:1 it sends me to the SSO login page. After entering my username and password I then end up with a HTTP 404 - not found page with the URL "http://<MY_SSO_HOST>:7777/sso/auth".
..You should think about getting to 10.2 at least, ..
Agreed but when I tried to upgrade the other day it fell in a big heap - so I backed it out to 10.1 again.
..I think I know what you mean. You installed the SSO SDK in a schema local to one workspace..
That is correct - had to do it as my instance has multiple applications and I want to check it works on this one before breaking anything else!
..No, that's not always the case. If you find that putting '80' in works in your configuration and leaving it out doesn't work then put it in..
I tried initially without the 80 but it threw errors whenever I tried to connect (these errors were APEX ones not SSO). On an off chance I put the 80 in there and presto it worked (in the sense that it redirected me to SSO anyway).
..Your application's use of a DB login/password is incongruous with using a different authentication method -- SSO or any other...
Given the constraints mentioned earlier (answer to first question above) I don't really have much choice. I have an Oracle application that uses DB accounts to authenticate users and authorize thier use of the app modules. What I need to do is 'wrap' and APEX application around this Oracle application to make it SOX compliant (it does not currently enforce password aging/structure etc.) So.. I was thinking that SSO might be the answer.
If SSO (used with OID) can enforce password aging and policies my intent is to have SSO 'manage' the user passwords for my APEX app (and it's underlying Oracle application). Hence the question about synching SSO with the underlying DB accounts. I thought the whole point of SSO/OID was to allow various enterprise apps to have thier authentication layers 'managed' by SSO - again maybe I'm misinterpreting this..
..if your application is working now with a non-SSO authentication scheme, then it should continue to work the same with SSO because after authentication, APP_USER is FRED in both cases..
Agreed - but how does SSO "know" to let a given user have access to that particular application?
Paul

Host: Unable to load application configuration + wrong install version on download

i am using 64 bit windows 7 ... when unable to playing video, it redirects me to the adobe download pages to get flash player ... the page says i am about to download flashplayer for win7 64 bit, of 9MB approximately, but the file i get has name "install_flashplayer11x32_mssd_aih.exe" (NOTE THE NUMBER 32) and this file just wont install it ends with error message: HOST: Unable to load application configuration ...
By google i found also file install_flashplayer11x64_mssd_aih.exe (NOTE THE NUMBER 64) ... this file runs the install, i get the final screen saying "installation completed" but after clicking the "finish" button i get an error message saying "an error occured while sending a command to the program" ...
I am just getting mad ... its 3 days i am trying to figure aout this problem ...
i also tryed files as "install_flash_player_11_plugin.exe" , "install_flash_player_11_plugin.msi" , "install_flash_player_11_active_x.exe" and "install_flash_player_11_active_x.msi" ... those files actually proceeds with the install, but at the end, the videos are still not displaying ...
When i am checking the plugins statuses in my firefox addons manager, it says Shockwave Flash is all right ...
The precedent version of flash player was working just fine, i do not understand why you must make such a mess every 2 months ...
How do i get work this?

yes, the pages is http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/
the page says:
Adobe Flash Player 11.3.300.257 (9.36 MB)
Your system: Windows 64-bit , English, Firefox
but when i click the "Download now" button i get the file named "install_flashplayer11x32_mssd_aih.exe" (NOTE THE NUMBER 32) which wont start and after few seconds i get the message "HOST: Unable to load application configuration"
but finaly i solved the problem ... i just installed the file found by google on some private page "install_flashplayer11x64_mssd_aih.exe" (NOTE THE NUMBER 64)
(the page is here: http://www.ziddu.com/download/16693235/install_flashplayer11x64_mssd_aih.exe.html)
and after that i disabled the protected mode of flashplayer by adding a line in the cfg file
the howto is here: http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1018071
i must say its quite shameful one must get this torture to have movies playing on websites ... this cant happen at open source stuf, at least not for 3 days ...
and being already here and complaining, i must say also (i hope some adobe emploee will read this) i am quite disgusted (and i believe not only me) by adobes bad habit to provide other software than flashplayer, when they include mcafee antivir into the install ...
it is literally taking the user as a stupid one ...
if i will need an antivir, i will look for it ...
i just hate when some society tries to infiltrete in my comp some crap software counting on possibility that at the download i will not pay enough attention
its just ridiculous and shameful behavior

HCP: host header for xs application

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for