Help with Greater Than Gatsby presets

I have been using these presets without any problem until recently. Half will work and half won't. Also, none of my regular photoshop brushes work. Like the dodge and burn or spot healing. Anyone know how to fix this?

I have been using these presets without any problem until recently. Half will work and half won't.
You may want to discuss that with the people who have provided those presets.
Like the dodge and burn or spot healing. Anyone know how to fix this?
With the information you have provided?
Please read these (restoring Preferences after making sure all customized presets like Actions, Patterns, Brushes etc. have been saved might be of special interest):
http://blogs.adobe.com/crawlspace/2012/07/photoshop-basic-troubleshooting-steps-to-fix-mos t-issues.html
http://forums.adobe.com/docs/DOC-2325

Similar Messages

User input formula variable with greater than/less than operators for KFG

Hello all,
I have used a formula in my query that is a difference of two key figures .For e.g:
Difference = tax from system A - tax from system B.
Now when the users run the report they should be prompted for the 'Difference' threshold for seeing the report say where difference is greater 100 or equal to 10 and so on.Currrently I have created a formula variable with 'user input' and created a 'condition' to display 'Difference' greater than the user entered value.
However,it is required to have various selection options for setting the threshold of difference.For e.g User should be able to set say 'equal to'/'greater than/less than/not equal to operator for 'difference' in the initial selection screen of the report.
With the current user-input formula variable I am not getting these 'greater than' etc operators.Any ideas on how to achieve this?

Ya know, that's all well and good ... BUT ... WHAT IF you do want to sort text type columns with Greater Than and Less Than operatiors??
SQL does it just Fine ... so WHY does APEX have the limit??? This is an Oracle BUG ... it SHOULD NOT limit the operators ... I realize "they" may be trying to be helpful with proper constraints to field searches ... but ... if SQL can do it, then ... no need for a limit.
EG ...
Show the records where
the "Begin_Year-Wk" data is less than or equal to "2009-09" AND
the "End_Year-Wk" data is greater than or equal to "2009-04"
... to give everything that was running in that 5 week period whether or not it starts within that time frame
I can run this query perfectly fine via SQL ... but not in APEX ... unless I reconvert a lot of strings back to numbers, and for sorting / formatting / explain-to-user purposes, I really don't want them to be numbers.
So ... there's gotta be a hidden tweak for operators somewhere ...

Filtering Interactive Reports with Greater Than Less Than Operators

The available filter operators in the interactive reports do not include greater than or less than. How is it possible to enable an application user to filter records where greater than or less then logic is needed?
For example the user wants to query records where sysdate falls between a start and end date.
Regards,
Todd

Ya know, that's all well and good ... BUT ... WHAT IF you do want to sort text type columns with Greater Than and Less Than operatiors??
SQL does it just Fine ... so WHY does APEX have the limit??? This is an Oracle BUG ... it SHOULD NOT limit the operators ... I realize "they" may be trying to be helpful with proper constraints to field searches ... but ... if SQL can do it, then ... no need for a limit.
EG ...
Show the records where
the "Begin_Year-Wk" data is less than or equal to "2009-09" AND
the "End_Year-Wk" data is greater than or equal to "2009-04"
... to give everything that was running in that 5 week period whether or not it starts within that time frame
I can run this query perfectly fine via SQL ... but not in APEX ... unless I reconvert a lot of strings back to numbers, and for sorting / formatting / explain-to-user purposes, I really don't want them to be numbers.
So ... there's gotta be a hidden tweak for operators somewhere ...

ROWNUM with Greater than symbol..!

Hi
Can any one explain why ">" greater than operator not working with ROWNUM.
FOR EXAMPLE:
SELECT * FROM EMP where rownum > 2;
But the less than operator is working.
SELECT * FROM EMP where rownum < 2;
Please clarify this.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Sathya

Hello,
" … since something like a rownumber actually doesn't exist …"I’m pretty sure the OP is referring to the pseudo-column ROWNUM, which generated automatically by the db systems, for every query. This value, starting with 1, is being attached to every record which satisfy the where clause condition. Hence, for the first record to be assigned a rownum, the where clause must consider rownum=1 as a valid condition.
" Rownum needs to be "generated" in a subquery first "I don't see any problem with the following code (with no subquery):
select * from emp
where rownum <=3;This query will display the first 3 fetched (not sorted) records from the emp table.
Regards,
Arie.

Can someone help with Premiere CS6 Export Presets?

I'm exporting video using a Mac, OS X 10.8.2 and I want to be sure Windows users will be able to play the video on their desktop, most likely using Windows Media player.
I didn't see a preset for .WMV format and I don't have a windows machine to test various presets.
Thanks for your help.
~Paul

Use H.264 .MP4 video - plays in webbrowser plays with quicktime plays with windows media player...

Help with more than one apple id on same computer

When my husband tries to do anything in his itunes library he gets the following error message,
"This computer is already associated with an apple id You can download past purchases on this computer with just one apple id every 90 days. This computer can be used with a different Apple id in 11 days"
I HAS been approx 3 months (90 days) since we purchased a new computer-but we have always had different itunes libraries. HELP!!

Only one account can be signed in at a time (via Settings > Store), and if you turn on automatic downloads and/or download past purchases from an account then you risk tying the iPad to that account for 90 days : http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4627

Help with a simple book preset

Hi I am trying to save a simple preset with a caption field and a file name field under the image.
With a single image per page and same page left and right.
When i run Auto Layout either it shows the caption or it shows the file name and then i have to manually select all text cells and apply a preset text field with name and caption.
No matter how many times i try and recreate a basic preset it just does not work
ANy one can supply or tell me what i need to do so when i click auto layout i get a medium size image with file name and caption under it without having to do any more layout
Thanks

Hi I am trying to save a simple preset with a caption field and a file name field under the image.
With a single image per page and same page left and right.
When i run Auto Layout either it shows the caption or it shows the file name and then i have to manually select all text cells and apply a preset text field with name and caption.
No matter how many times i try and recreate a basic preset it just does not work
ANy one can supply or tell me what i need to do so when i click auto layout i get a medium size image with file name and caption under it without having to do any more layout
Thanks

Search Help with more than one value back

Dear Experts,
We added two customer fields to the SC.
For the first customer field we created Search Help.
When picking any option from the search help we need TWO values back u2013 one value to the first customer (the field with the search help) and the second value to the second customer field (the field without the search help).
Can you please advice how can we have TWO values back from the search help?
Thanks in advance,
Keren

Hello Keren,
See if the below thread answers your question..
How to create a search help
Thanks
Arshad

Entry in KOMV-KBETR feild with greater than 11 digits.

Hi Experts
Error related to entry too long is given by standard SAP as Amount field i.e Rate (condition amount or percentage) is defined as KOMV-KBETR which is of length 11. How can i enter more than 11 digits??

Hi,
These are standard structures technically i dont know if its possible to append those standard fields
but functionally there are two alternatives
You can increase the per unit Quantity to accomdate the value for e.g.
Condition amount is 100000000000 per 1 EA you can make it
1000000000 per 1000 EA so that the field length is kept below 12 digits
If its increasing in only decimals for e.g.1.0000000000 then please change your decimal settings in user id SU01
Thanks
Diwakar

Terrible customer service, and no help with defective camera

Madams and Sirs,
This camera (see below) was a Christmas present, and we discovered first last week that it had a manufacturing defect. (one of the small tabs holding the case half together got installed in a pinched way.)
Best Buy has always had fantastic customer service, and we have been very happy. We have spend many thousand dollars in your store every year. So we were sure the store would have a solution.
We took it in to your store #1423 on Curtner in San Jose to try to exchange or replace under warranty.
I understand you sometimes you are not able to help a customer, but this email is first about the shock I got when I spoke with Megan in customer service.
As many customers in Silicon Valley, I am an engineering manager, and we have performed destructive testing on many of our own products. The defect on this camera is obviously a manufacturing defect, and not possible to be caused by poor handling. This is very obvious.
Megan told me with other employees as well as my son listening next to me that I was a liar, and that the damage was caused by abuse, and not a defect. I tried to explain that was not possible, and she interrupted me, and again said that i was not telling the truth, and that the assembly error was caused by us.
I then asked if it was possible to have the matter reviewed by the store manager, and she responded she was the store manager.
I left with the camera, and the matter unresolved, and had to explain to my son that I was not a liar, and that Megan must be wrong and "some people just have a bad day sometimes".
I will not be spoken to with insults like that, and I can no longer go to your store with my kids, and if my employees treated any customer the way Megan did, I would make sure she received training to correct this. If the store manager have this attitude to customers, the entire organisation usually follows, and I will not be a customer in a store like that.
1. Please help resolve this issue.Order number: {removed per forum guidelines}

Hello erikev,
Cameras are nice to have, especially with young children, so I can imagine how frustrating it can be to find yourself with a pinched casing. When something goes wrong, it’s never a fun situation, and while it may not be something we can necessarily help with, great customer service should still be provided. It sounds like this didn’t happen the way we hoped, and I’m sorry this was at your expense.
As this situation is definitely concerning, I looked into your account to see how I might be able to assist. However, I have found your concerns have reached Terrance with our executive support team. He is currently looking into your situation and should contact you once more information is available. From here, Terrance will be your first point of contact.
Hopefully he can find a good resolution for you,
Alex|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
Private Message

Slide show greater than 200

I have Photoshop Elements 6.0 and Premier Elements 4.0. I would like to create a slide show with greater than 200 slides and then burn that show to a DVD. Photosho Elements will not let me work with greater than 200 images. How do you get around this problem?

Create two projects intead of one and export the slide show in to PRE then burn a DVD.

Rownum greater than query

Hi all,
first of all, what I am aware about...
I am aware about the fact, that ROWNUM filters, inside the query which is to be filtered by rownum, are incorrect. That is this is incorrect:
select * from <table> where rownum < 20;
Also I am aware, that the following will never return a result:
select * from <table> where rownum > 20;
That is clear. The correct version of the "less than" query is:
select * from (select * from <table> order by a) where rownum < 20;
Now the question: what does the last example still not work with "greater than" queries:
Take e.g. following example:
select * from (
select * from dba_objects order by object_name
) where rownum > 5
;

I ckeck it again. It's working for me !
Any way I'll quote it.
How ROWNUM Works
ROWNUM is a pseudocolumn (not a real column) that is available in a query. ROWNUM will be assigned the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, ... N, where N is the number of rows in the set ROWNUM is used with. A ROWNUM value is not assigned permanently to a row (this is a common misconception). A row in a table does not have a number; you cannot ask for row 5 from a table—there is no such thing.
Also confusing to many people is when a ROWNUM value is actually assigned. A ROWNUM value is assigned to a row after it passes the predicate phase of the query but before the query does any sorting or aggregation. Also, a ROWNUM value is incremented only after it is assigned, which is why the following query will never return a row:
select *
from t
where ROWNUM > 1;
Because ROWNUM > 1 is not true for the first row, ROWNUM does not advance to 2. Hence, no ROWNUM value ever gets to be greater than 1. Consider a query with this structure:
select ..., ROWNUM
from t
where <where clause>
group by <columns>
having <having clause>
order by <columns>;
Think of it as being processed in this order:
1. The FROM/WHERE clause goes first.
2. ROWNUM is assigned and incremented to each output row from the FROM/WHERE clause.
3. SELECT is applied.
4. GROUP BY is applied.
5. HAVING is applied.
6. ORDER BY is applied.
That is why a query in the following form is almost certainly an error:
select *
from emp
where ROWNUM <= 5
order by sal desc;
The intention was most likely to get the five highest-paid people—a top-N query. What the query will return is five random records (the first five the query happens to hit), sorted by salary. The procedural pseudocode for this query is as follows:
ROWNUM = 1
for x in
( select * from emp )
loop
exit when NOT(ROWNUM <= 5)
OUTPUT record to temp
ROWNUM = ROWNUM+1
end loop
SORT TEMP
It gets the first five records and then sorts them. A query with WHERE ROWNUM = 5 or WHERE ROWNUM > 5 doesn't make sense. This is because a ROWNUM value is assigned to a row during the predicate evaluation and gets incremented only after a row passes the WHERE clause.
Here is the correct version of this query:
select *
from
( select *
from emp
order by sal desc )
where ROWNUM <= 5;
This version will sort EMP by salary descending and then return the first five records it encounters (the top-five records). As you'll see in the top-N discussion coming up shortly, Oracle Database doesn't really sort the entire result set—it is smarter than that—but conceptually that is what takes place.

Auto adjustment of page orientation causes printing issues with documents that have a page width greater than its page height.

Hi,
Since an upgrade from Word 2003 to Word 2010, we are experiencing printing issues with certain
documents that have a page width greater than its page height.
In Word 2003, it was no problem to set the page width greater than the page height while setting the page orientation to "portrait".
In Word 2010, this seems impossible: despite leaving the page orientation to "portrait", if one changes the page width/height as stated,
Word 2010 automatically adjusts the orientation to "landscape". Resetting the orientation to "portrait" will flip the page's width/heigth settings.
This behaviour causes printing problems: the page prints out 90° rotated.
I do not believe this is a printer driver issue: I tried several different printer drivers, and all give the same (bad) result. Setting the printer driver's page orientation settings (before printing) makes no difference, as
Word 2010 seems to force the page orientation settings.
Inserting the documents 90° rotated is not an option, since it causes problems with the printing margins.
This is very annoying, since we have to print official documents of a municipality (driver's licences).
Is there a workaround for this issue?
Regards,
Laurent Grandgaignage
Sysadmin Gemeentebestuur Stabroek, Belgium

Hi
Thank you for using
Microsoft Office for IT Professionals Forums.
From your description, we can follow these steps to test this issue
Step 1: Repair Office 2010
1.
Click
Start, and then click Control Panel.
2.
Click
Programs and Features.
3.
Click the
Office 2010 program that you want to repair, and then click
Change.
4.
Click
Repair, and then click Continue. You might need to restart your computer after the repair is complete.
Step 2:
Rename the global template (Normal.dotm)Follow the steps for the operating system that you are using:
Windows Vista and Windows 7
a)
Exit Word 2010
b)
Click
Start.
c)
In the
Start Search box, type the following text, and then press
ENTER:
1.
%userprofile%\appdata\roaming\microsoft\templates
d)
Right-click
Normal.dotm, and then click Rename.
e)
Type
Oldword.old, and then press ENTER.
Microsoft Windows XP
a)
Exit Word 2010
b)
Click
Start, and then click Run.
c)
In the
Open box, type the following text, and then press ENTER:
%userprofile%\Application Data\Microsoft\Templates
d)
Right-click
Normal.dotm, and then click Rename.
e)
Type
Oldword.old, and then press ENTER.
f)
Close Windows Explorer.
How to troubleshoot print failures in Word 2010, Word 2007, and Word 2003
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/826845
Please take your time to try the suggestions and let me know the results at your earliest convenience. If anything is unclear or if there is anything
I can do for you, please feel free to let me know.
Hope that helps.
Sincerely
William Zhou CHNPlease remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.

In Exchange 2013 i cannot open mails with attachments greater than 19.6 MB in EWS or OWA

Hello,
i have in Exchange 2013 CU3 on Windows 2012 the following problem :
When backup mails using EWS i get the message " EWS Error Code : ErrorMessageSizeExceeded." in mails with attachments greater than 20.137 KB ( 19.6 MB).
Then I checked all the settings of the EWS , but the defaults are already significantly higher than these 19.6 MB (Base64 approximately 26.5 MB)
web.config ( maxAllowedContentLength = " 85000000 ").
Settings of the MaxSendSize and ReceiveSize are 300MB .
All requestfiltering settings in IIS are set to 85MB.
When i access via EMS or OWA , file attachments over 19.6 MB can not be opened .
However, the preview shows in OWA the correct mail including attachment and it can be saved from the preview up to the set maximum size.
By double clicking on an email in OWA bigger than 19.6 MB i get the following error message:
"Error : Your request can not be completed right now Please try again later . . "
Send and receive mail can also be up to maxsize .
When accessing via Outlook , this problem does not occur.
i hope anyone here can help me
Thanks in advance

Hi,
To change the maximum message size for Outlook Web App clients, you need to change the value of
maxAllowedContentLength, maxRequestLength and both instances of
maxReceivedMessageSize by editing %ExchangeInstallPath%ClientAccess\Owa\web.config in notepad.
To change the maximum message size for Exchange Web Services clients, you need to change the value of
maxAllowedContentLength and all instances of maxReceivedMessageSize="67108864" in %ExchangeInstallPath%ClientAccess\exchweb\ews\web.config.
When you are finished, save and close the Web.config file. Also need to restart IIS by running the following command:
IISReset /noforce
For more information about Configure Client-Specific Message Size Limits on Client Access Servers, please refer to:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh529949(v=exchg.150).aspx
Thanks,
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support

Sending Emails with Attachments greater than 255 chars in 4.6C

Hi,
I have a requirement in which i have to send mails with attachments greater than 255 characters. The attachment would be a tab-delimited .TXT file. Since i am working on 4.6C, i don't have the luxury of using the FM 'SCMS_STRING_TO_FTEXT'.
It's very urgent. So any help in this regards would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
Balaji

Hi,
Internal table to be passed to SOLIST1 type int, table and then compress this table using fm "table_compress" with the compressed table then call fm "table_decompress" and pass this to function module SO_NEW_DOCUMENT_ATT_SEND_API1.
Keep in mind the following variable
i_packing_list-transf_bin = 'X'.
aRs

Help with Greater Than Gatsby presets

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for